![]() |
The result was delete. No arguments for this article's inclusion have been made. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable brewery. References provide a few passing mentions in the Los Angeles Times, nothing more. I could find no sources in a search. Sorry, I misstated. Actually the article references provide no independent reliable sources; in a search I found a couple of passing mentions in the LA Times. Declined prod.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the notability requirements for an academic as per Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Daesnsieatble ( talk) 22:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC)— Daesnsieatble ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Subject fails on WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Best known as the founder of a band, AntarDhvani, which seems non-notable itself and fails on general criteria of inclusion. References are dubious and unreliable consisting of trivial coverage, including facebook pages and youtube videos. The Times Of India, so far my guess is concerned, is a reliable source,is mentioned falsely in the references which redirects to a Facebook Page. Conclusively, an article about a musician which fails to establish notability. Hitro talk 22:23, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Fails on WP:BAND. References are from YouTube, Facebook and some unreliable sources which are mostly frivolous in nature. Edit History reflects that this article has been edited mostly by people related to this band. One YouTube video is non-english, other is just trivial. Altogether crashes on WP:GNG with zero encyclopedic value. Considering The Times of India to be a reliable source,it is mentioned in the reference list but it redirects to a Facebook page. Hitro talk 22:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 22:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
All information is either pulled directly from a product advertisement or is based on original research. I don't think secondary source material would be possible for something this specific. Even with prices removed it reads like a sales catalog. Some of this could possibly be moved into Waterfall chart, though I'm not sure how much without it being a blatant product advertisement. -- ElHef ( Meep?) 20:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The discussions reference some other, ostensibly similar, articles, but those should be dealt with as their own AfDs, if appropriate. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
No evidence of notability or WP:RS. It seems to be a family history piece and is totally original research. Brigade Piron ( talk) 20:55, 20 January 2014 (UTC) I fear the same is true for the other articles which I suspect to have been created by a sockpuppet of the same user:
Cyriel Camiel Lesage and Hector Alidor Lesage were brothers who were soldiers for Belgium during World War I. Both have excelled in bravery during the most decisive battles of World War I and received military distinctions. The suffering of their family is representative for the disaster of World War I in Flanders Fields. The eldest, Cyriel, has fought in the crucial battles at the beginning of the war to slow down the invading German troops and to halt them at the river Yser, therefore disrupting Germany’s Schliefen Plan. The youngest, Hector, has fought in the final battle to defeat the Germans after he had voluntarily joined the army to revenge the death of his brother Cyriel. Both have received the “Croix de Guerre” medal, Cyriel also received the Yser Medal, while Hector additionally received the Victory medal and the “Inter-Allied Victory Medal 1914–1918”. Cyriel is one of only a handful of soldiers who have been buried during WWI at the Paris’ world famous cemetery of Père Lachaise, while Hector has been buried at the military cemetery of Houthulst, not far from where he was killed. The brothers have two great-grandfathers who had earlier fought in Napoleon’s "Grande Armée". They are the granduncles of soprano and music composer Françoise Vanhecke and physicist and Georgia Tech Professor Nico Felicien Declercq. They are also blood-related to Belgium’s well-known music composer Peter Benoit. User:FlandersFieldsStory 12:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:38, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Article appears to be naked advertising WP:SPAM. No references are cited and no effort is made to establish notability in the article. Article's creator and various editors appear to be connected to or employees of the subject corporation. Article was previously cited for copyright violation, direct copy and paste from subject's Linked In page. Linked In page was subsequently deleted. Article was tagged for conflict of interest, no sources, advertisement, and lack of notability. Article was also tagged PROD. PROD tag & maintenance tags were all subsequently removed without explanation or any corrections to the article. A quick Google failed to turn up any WP:RS sources establishing notability. Am I missing something here? Let me know if I am pulling the trigger too quickly. Ad Orientem ( talk) 18:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | gossip _ 22:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
This does not establish notability independent of Macross through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details and in-depth product details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. I am also nominating these articles with the same issues:
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 22:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
No indication of significance and third party reference links. It promotes companies indirectly. Itsalleasy ( talk) 18:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:37, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was that the article Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a top fully pro professional league. Has only played in the Malaysia Premier League (the second tier) and not the Malaysia Super League (the top tier). This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:37, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:37, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Non notable band, fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. Prod declined by article creator without explanation. Article is in Portuguese. No sources. Safiel ( talk) 17:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | prattle _ 22:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Couln't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn ( talk) 20:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was Merge into Snapchat. As User:NinjaRobotPirate said, If it turns out to have lasting consequences, it can always be recreated. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:28, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:EVENT - just a minor blip in the history of snapchat - no evidence of last effect. Beerest 2 talk 15:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Aliens_(film) I don't actually see a real consensus here. If anything, the arguments lean towards delete, but leaving the redirect behind seems harmless, especially considering Carrie Henn already redirects there. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:46, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
The page only contains one sentence and does not explain fully why the person is notable enough to have an article. Makro ( talk) 15:23, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Article does not sufficiently indicate how the subject is notable by Wikipedia's criteria. Google search for "james hollands" songwriter does not result in significant discussion. References provided do not mention the subject. I'm not disputing that he's co-written the songs, only that in itself it doesn't establish notability. ... discospinster talk 15:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Article duplicates Master of Science with far too much specificity (being an individual course on an individual subject being offered by an individual university) for which no independent coverage in reliable sources has been presented. WP:COI possible but not definite. Barney the barney barney ( talk) 14:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:06, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable altcoin, fails WP:GNG and potentially WP:PROMO. Citation Needed | Talk 14:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/datacoin-dtc-features-blockchain-data-003900184.html http://www.kswo.com/story/24482545/datacoin-dtc-features-in-blockchain-data-storage-and-web-apps-embedded-in-blockchain http://news.silobreaker.com/datacoin-dtc-features-inblockchain-data-storage-and-web-apps-embedded-in-blockchain-5_2267672482729164844 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.139.192.199 ( talk) 23:59, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai actor and model. The only references there have ever been in the article, to a blog and another Wiki, have been removed for not being reliable sources, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. A later merger may also be appropriate, but that is not the purpose here at WP:AfD. Bearian ( talk) 18:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Completing nomination process for an unregistered user, who gave the following rationale: Article just duplicates or refers to content that already exists in Kelsey Smith-Briggs. It has been a stub tagged with "Unreferenced" and "Expert needed" tags for over four years and I cannot find anything substantial beyond what is already in this short article. This is one of the cases where separate articles for the murder victim and a law named after him/her is completely unnecessary like Kendra Webdale, Nixzmary Brown, Leandra's Law, or even Amber Hagerman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.139.6 ( talk) 15:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
I do not know if I can vote in this AfD since I am the one completing it, but I would say Delete because it has barely changed or expanded since its creation in June 2009 and I have been unable to find any other significant information about the law that can be added to this article either, probably because the law only applies to one state where as the cases where we do have separate articles for the law and the victims they're named after (e.g. Jessica's Law/ Jessica Lunsford and Laci and Conner's Law/ Laci Peterson), it applies to multiple states or an entire country. The first paragraph just duplicates Section 5 of Kelsey Smith-Briggs while the second paragraph just reiterates what happened to her, which is already explained in detail in her article. I removed a third paragraph while completing this process because it just duplicated the first and future expansion is highly unlikely. I do not think this is a plausable search time either since her name is already in the law's name, which is quite long anyway. However, I have no objections to redirecting to Kelsey Smith-Briggs if you believe that is a better choice. The Legendary Ranger ( talk) 14:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai actress and model. The only references there have ever been in the article, to a blog and another Wiki, have been removed for not being reliable sources, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:26, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai actor and model. The only reference there has ever been in the article, to another Wiki, has been removed for not being a reliable source, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai "actor, singer and model". The only reference there has ever been in the article, to another Wiki, has been removed for not being a reliable source, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai actress. The only reference there has ever been in the article, to another Wiki, has been removed for not being a reliable source, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Filipino "actor, singer and model". The only reference there was in the article, to a fanblog on Blogspot, has been removed for not being a reliable source, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai "actor, singer and model". The only reference there has ever been in the article, to another Wiki, has been removed for not being a reliable source, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 13:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Article on former wine merchant and broadcaster of borderline notability at best. Apparent autobiography, article was promotional. Unsourced claims and puffery were removed. Subject, after repeatedly blanking the text, now requests deletion [13], which should be granted per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Coretheapple ( talk) 13:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not clear how this meets notability guidelines. References provided are of unclear reliability and at least one if not more are self-published. Claims such as " 26 song hit compilation" and "smash single" without mention of charting position are more promotional than demonstrating notability. RadioFan ( talk) 04:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Non- notable website, no coverage. I speedied but an IP user removed the tag. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5, created by user evading block. Amalthea 14:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable radio show. Jeff Duran aka Jeff Joseph Dandurand aka Jeffrey Dandurand is not notable. Belligerence - The Journey of JJ Star, How Embarrassing, Defects of Character and Cursed Since Birth are not notable. His individual radio shows is not notable. Wikipedia is not here to promote Duran and it is not here to catalog the output of a non notable individual. Clips from the show and media releases are not independent sources. There is no coverage of this show in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
duffbeerforme since you have been doing such a fine job making sure my name or anything that is associated with me doesn't appear (Now be a good little nerd and stop with the ignorant commentary where you make it known how "not notable" I or whatever associated with me is.) You can tear my pathetic career to shreds but alluding that I was behind any of this amateurish horse shit in various posts is borderline slanderous. I am surprised people don't look into why you make such an effort to police any mention of my likeness or associations. Good job taking me off, bad job keeping your personal vendettas out of your un-paid writing gig. Justify your existence explaining why all those shitty indie bands/people from Australia nobody knows have Wikipedia pages - instead of pouring salt on my name. There should be no need for LAWSUITS -- instead require that statements by douche bags like duffbeerforme be investigated, along with a LINK to their website/blog/page with whatever supporting documents they wish to provide. While I respect you for keeping me off of Wikipedia, the ignorant shit that follows needs to stop asap. Something is not notable-erase it or whatever, no need to take shots when I had no intention for some of my past failures to be read or known by anybody. Thanks for making it public and worse.-- JeffDandurand ( talk) 03:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
A rather useless content fork of Taunting, and really adds nothing to the understanding of that topic ES &L 11:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Or, perhaps, stepover-armlock-camel-clutched into oblivion? Sandstein 20:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
This is effectively a "List of" except that only a couple of the moves actually have articles...and even those probably should not. As such, this is a non-notable list, and purely WP:OR ES &L 10:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Since the editor who originally contested the previous PROD has now !voted for deletion, and since this seems to be snowballing anyway, an early close seems warranted. Note that I was the admin who originally undeleted the article, and I've briefly discussed it with Gstridsigne; if anyone feels that I therefore shouldn't be closing this discussion and that it should run its full course, please contact me. Yunshui 雲 水 08:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable phobia - Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Contains massive original research and "if..." statements. Absolute failure in terms of medical references. This is in no way an appropriate topic for inclusion, and was deleted after PROD and should have stayed that way ES &L 09:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 19:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
This article is fundamentally unsound because it applies nebulous and debatable rules of spelling and grammar to proper names, which simply cannot stand. There is no evidence that these are "mistakes" rather than intentional style choices, and we cannot assert that companies must adhere to any particular person's idea of what is "proper" and "improper" spelling or grammar. Strunk and White is not holy writ.
PROD was contested by the article creator. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 08:30, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable book. Only source is amazon ( [21]). Vanjagenije ( talk) 13:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable adult film actor, does not meet WP:PORNBIO. While he has been nominated for adult film awards, he has not won any. Article has been the subject of repeated BLP violations, the most recent of which was directed at a person unrelated to the article subject and was in place for months. Risker ( talk) 03:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Pure press release, and the style indicates an almost certain copyvio DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was Speedied as copyvio by RHaworth. Peridon ( talk) 11:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
I am unable to find significant discussion of this book in multiple reliable sources per WP:NBOOK. Google search only brings up entries in book seller web sites. Proposed deletion contested. ... discospinster talk 04:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete, either a different Moore, or a hoax.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:17, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Tagged as hoax. Has an entry in IMDB but I've been unable to locate reliable sources to establish that this film actually exists, just listings on various third party filmographies. See also talk page comments: "Not listed on his website. No press about it. This may quite possibly have been a typo/hoax/something else that's been repeated often enough to be assumed to be true." Can anyone locate sources to establish this film exists? Muchness ( talk) 04:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep; consensus is that she scrapes by with an independent claim of notability. Mojo Hand ( talk) 04:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Though I am not a big fan of the WP:BLP1E argument, it seems clear to me that this woman is not notable outside of being married to Jack Black, and thus that this article is indeed a BLP1E. If there is any content here that cannot already be found at her husband's article, we should just merge it there (since it will almost certainly be about Black marrying her). Jinkinson talk to me 04:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Bigpoliticsfan ( talk) 02:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was merge to Ontario Highway 401. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
I hate to do this, because I was hoping to upgrade this article to be better. Unfortunately, I've been confounded by the absolute lack of sources on this topic. Aside from very brief mentions on Self-published roadgeek sites, a couple traffic camera names, and a label on a mapbook, there is no coverage of this. It's just a fancy highway transfer, variants of which appear on any local-express freeway setup.
So, with notability in question and few if any reliable sources to validate it, I'm nominating this for deletion. Floydian τ ¢ 02:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nationwide Building Society. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
This is an advert. Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
This is an advert. Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Article is an advert. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. No arguments for this article's inclusion have been made. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable brewery. References provide a few passing mentions in the Los Angeles Times, nothing more. I could find no sources in a search. Sorry, I misstated. Actually the article references provide no independent reliable sources; in a search I found a couple of passing mentions in the LA Times. Declined prod.
MelanieN (
talk)
23:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the notability requirements for an academic as per Wikipedia:Notability (academics). Daesnsieatble ( talk) 22:25, 20 January 2014 (UTC)— Daesnsieatble ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Subject fails on WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Best known as the founder of a band, AntarDhvani, which seems non-notable itself and fails on general criteria of inclusion. References are dubious and unreliable consisting of trivial coverage, including facebook pages and youtube videos. The Times Of India, so far my guess is concerned, is a reliable source,is mentioned falsely in the references which redirects to a Facebook Page. Conclusively, an article about a musician which fails to establish notability. Hitro talk 22:23, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Fails on WP:BAND. References are from YouTube, Facebook and some unreliable sources which are mostly frivolous in nature. Edit History reflects that this article has been edited mostly by people related to this band. One YouTube video is non-english, other is just trivial. Altogether crashes on WP:GNG with zero encyclopedic value. Considering The Times of India to be a reliable source,it is mentioned in the reference list but it redirects to a Facebook page. Hitro talk 22:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 22:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
All information is either pulled directly from a product advertisement or is based on original research. I don't think secondary source material would be possible for something this specific. Even with prices removed it reads like a sales catalog. Some of this could possibly be moved into Waterfall chart, though I'm not sure how much without it being a blatant product advertisement. -- ElHef ( Meep?) 20:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The discussions reference some other, ostensibly similar, articles, but those should be dealt with as their own AfDs, if appropriate. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
No evidence of notability or WP:RS. It seems to be a family history piece and is totally original research. Brigade Piron ( talk) 20:55, 20 January 2014 (UTC) I fear the same is true for the other articles which I suspect to have been created by a sockpuppet of the same user:
Cyriel Camiel Lesage and Hector Alidor Lesage were brothers who were soldiers for Belgium during World War I. Both have excelled in bravery during the most decisive battles of World War I and received military distinctions. The suffering of their family is representative for the disaster of World War I in Flanders Fields. The eldest, Cyriel, has fought in the crucial battles at the beginning of the war to slow down the invading German troops and to halt them at the river Yser, therefore disrupting Germany’s Schliefen Plan. The youngest, Hector, has fought in the final battle to defeat the Germans after he had voluntarily joined the army to revenge the death of his brother Cyriel. Both have received the “Croix de Guerre” medal, Cyriel also received the Yser Medal, while Hector additionally received the Victory medal and the “Inter-Allied Victory Medal 1914–1918”. Cyriel is one of only a handful of soldiers who have been buried during WWI at the Paris’ world famous cemetery of Père Lachaise, while Hector has been buried at the military cemetery of Houthulst, not far from where he was killed. The brothers have two great-grandfathers who had earlier fought in Napoleon’s "Grande Armée". They are the granduncles of soprano and music composer Françoise Vanhecke and physicist and Georgia Tech Professor Nico Felicien Declercq. They are also blood-related to Belgium’s well-known music composer Peter Benoit. User:FlandersFieldsStory 12:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:38, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Article appears to be naked advertising WP:SPAM. No references are cited and no effort is made to establish notability in the article. Article's creator and various editors appear to be connected to or employees of the subject corporation. Article was previously cited for copyright violation, direct copy and paste from subject's Linked In page. Linked In page was subsequently deleted. Article was tagged for conflict of interest, no sources, advertisement, and lack of notability. Article was also tagged PROD. PROD tag & maintenance tags were all subsequently removed without explanation or any corrections to the article. A quick Google failed to turn up any WP:RS sources establishing notability. Am I missing something here? Let me know if I am pulling the trigger too quickly. Ad Orientem ( talk) 18:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | gossip _ 22:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
This does not establish notability independent of Macross through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details and in-depth product details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. I am also nominating these articles with the same issues:
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 22:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
No indication of significance and third party reference links. It promotes companies indirectly. Itsalleasy ( talk) 18:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:37, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was that the article Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played in a top fully pro professional league. Has only played in the Malaysia Premier League (the second tier) and not the Malaysia Super League (the top tier). This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:37, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:37, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Non notable band, fails WP:NBAND and WP:GNG. Prod declined by article creator without explanation. Article is in Portuguese. No sources. Safiel ( talk) 17:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | prattle _ 22:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 17:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Couln't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn ( talk) 20:36, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was Merge into Snapchat. As User:NinjaRobotPirate said, If it turns out to have lasting consequences, it can always be recreated. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:28, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:EVENT - just a minor blip in the history of snapchat - no evidence of last effect. Beerest 2 talk 15:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Aliens_(film) I don't actually see a real consensus here. If anything, the arguments lean towards delete, but leaving the redirect behind seems harmless, especially considering Carrie Henn already redirects there. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:46, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
The page only contains one sentence and does not explain fully why the person is notable enough to have an article. Makro ( talk) 15:23, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Article does not sufficiently indicate how the subject is notable by Wikipedia's criteria. Google search for "james hollands" songwriter does not result in significant discussion. References provided do not mention the subject. I'm not disputing that he's co-written the songs, only that in itself it doesn't establish notability. ... discospinster talk 15:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Article duplicates Master of Science with far too much specificity (being an individual course on an individual subject being offered by an individual university) for which no independent coverage in reliable sources has been presented. WP:COI possible but not definite. Barney the barney barney ( talk) 14:50, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:06, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable altcoin, fails WP:GNG and potentially WP:PROMO. Citation Needed | Talk 14:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/datacoin-dtc-features-blockchain-data-003900184.html http://www.kswo.com/story/24482545/datacoin-dtc-features-in-blockchain-data-storage-and-web-apps-embedded-in-blockchain http://news.silobreaker.com/datacoin-dtc-features-inblockchain-data-storage-and-web-apps-embedded-in-blockchain-5_2267672482729164844 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.139.192.199 ( talk) 23:59, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:35, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai actor and model. The only references there have ever been in the article, to a blog and another Wiki, have been removed for not being reliable sources, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. A later merger may also be appropriate, but that is not the purpose here at WP:AfD. Bearian ( talk) 18:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Completing nomination process for an unregistered user, who gave the following rationale: Article just duplicates or refers to content that already exists in Kelsey Smith-Briggs. It has been a stub tagged with "Unreferenced" and "Expert needed" tags for over four years and I cannot find anything substantial beyond what is already in this short article. This is one of the cases where separate articles for the murder victim and a law named after him/her is completely unnecessary like Kendra Webdale, Nixzmary Brown, Leandra's Law, or even Amber Hagerman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.139.6 ( talk) 15:02, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
I do not know if I can vote in this AfD since I am the one completing it, but I would say Delete because it has barely changed or expanded since its creation in June 2009 and I have been unable to find any other significant information about the law that can be added to this article either, probably because the law only applies to one state where as the cases where we do have separate articles for the law and the victims they're named after (e.g. Jessica's Law/ Jessica Lunsford and Laci and Conner's Law/ Laci Peterson), it applies to multiple states or an entire country. The first paragraph just duplicates Section 5 of Kelsey Smith-Briggs while the second paragraph just reiterates what happened to her, which is already explained in detail in her article. I removed a third paragraph while completing this process because it just duplicated the first and future expansion is highly unlikely. I do not think this is a plausable search time either since her name is already in the law's name, which is quite long anyway. However, I have no objections to redirecting to Kelsey Smith-Briggs if you believe that is a better choice. The Legendary Ranger ( talk) 14:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai actress and model. The only references there have ever been in the article, to a blog and another Wiki, have been removed for not being reliable sources, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:26, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai actor and model. The only reference there has ever been in the article, to another Wiki, has been removed for not being a reliable source, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:08, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai "actor, singer and model". The only reference there has ever been in the article, to another Wiki, has been removed for not being a reliable source, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai actress. The only reference there has ever been in the article, to another Wiki, has been removed for not being a reliable source, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Filipino "actor, singer and model". The only reference there was in the article, to a fanblog on Blogspot, has been removed for not being a reliable source, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 14:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Totally unsourced BLP about Thai "actor, singer and model". The only reference there has ever been in the article, to another Wiki, has been removed for not being a reliable source, leaving the article without any source of any kind. Thomas.W talk to me 13:58, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Article on former wine merchant and broadcaster of borderline notability at best. Apparent autobiography, article was promotional. Unsourced claims and puffery were removed. Subject, after repeatedly blanking the text, now requests deletion [13], which should be granted per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. Coretheapple ( talk) 13:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:04, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not clear how this meets notability guidelines. References provided are of unclear reliability and at least one if not more are self-published. Claims such as " 26 song hit compilation" and "smash single" without mention of charting position are more promotional than demonstrating notability. RadioFan ( talk) 04:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:03, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Non- notable website, no coverage. I speedied but an IP user removed the tag. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5, created by user evading block. Amalthea 14:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable radio show. Jeff Duran aka Jeff Joseph Dandurand aka Jeffrey Dandurand is not notable. Belligerence - The Journey of JJ Star, How Embarrassing, Defects of Character and Cursed Since Birth are not notable. His individual radio shows is not notable. Wikipedia is not here to promote Duran and it is not here to catalog the output of a non notable individual. Clips from the show and media releases are not independent sources. There is no coverage of this show in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:40, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
duffbeerforme since you have been doing such a fine job making sure my name or anything that is associated with me doesn't appear (Now be a good little nerd and stop with the ignorant commentary where you make it known how "not notable" I or whatever associated with me is.) You can tear my pathetic career to shreds but alluding that I was behind any of this amateurish horse shit in various posts is borderline slanderous. I am surprised people don't look into why you make such an effort to police any mention of my likeness or associations. Good job taking me off, bad job keeping your personal vendettas out of your un-paid writing gig. Justify your existence explaining why all those shitty indie bands/people from Australia nobody knows have Wikipedia pages - instead of pouring salt on my name. There should be no need for LAWSUITS -- instead require that statements by douche bags like duffbeerforme be investigated, along with a LINK to their website/blog/page with whatever supporting documents they wish to provide. While I respect you for keeping me off of Wikipedia, the ignorant shit that follows needs to stop asap. Something is not notable-erase it or whatever, no need to take shots when I had no intention for some of my past failures to be read or known by anybody. Thanks for making it public and worse.-- JeffDandurand ( talk) 03:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
A rather useless content fork of Taunting, and really adds nothing to the understanding of that topic ES &L 11:10, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Or, perhaps, stepover-armlock-camel-clutched into oblivion? Sandstein 20:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
This is effectively a "List of" except that only a couple of the moves actually have articles...and even those probably should not. As such, this is a non-notable list, and purely WP:OR ES &L 10:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Since the editor who originally contested the previous PROD has now !voted for deletion, and since this seems to be snowballing anyway, an early close seems warranted. Note that I was the admin who originally undeleted the article, and I've briefly discussed it with Gstridsigne; if anyone feels that I therefore shouldn't be closing this discussion and that it should run its full course, please contact me. Yunshui 雲 水 08:12, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable phobia - Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Contains massive original research and "if..." statements. Absolute failure in terms of medical references. This is in no way an appropriate topic for inclusion, and was deleted after PROD and should have stayed that way ES &L 09:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. postdlf ( talk) 19:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
This article is fundamentally unsound because it applies nebulous and debatable rules of spelling and grammar to proper names, which simply cannot stand. There is no evidence that these are "mistakes" rather than intentional style choices, and we cannot assert that companies must adhere to any particular person's idea of what is "proper" and "improper" spelling or grammar. Strunk and White is not holy writ.
PROD was contested by the article creator. NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 08:30, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 21:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable book. Only source is amazon ( [21]). Vanjagenije ( talk) 13:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable adult film actor, does not meet WP:PORNBIO. While he has been nominated for adult film awards, he has not won any. Article has been the subject of repeated BLP violations, the most recent of which was directed at a person unrelated to the article subject and was in place for months. Risker ( talk) 03:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:21, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Pure press release, and the style indicates an almost certain copyvio DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was Speedied as copyvio by RHaworth. Peridon ( talk) 11:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
I am unable to find significant discussion of this book in multiple reliable sources per WP:NBOOK. Google search only brings up entries in book seller web sites. Proposed deletion contested. ... discospinster talk 04:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete, either a different Moore, or a hoax.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:17, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Tagged as hoax. Has an entry in IMDB but I've been unable to locate reliable sources to establish that this film actually exists, just listings on various third party filmographies. See also talk page comments: "Not listed on his website. No press about it. This may quite possibly have been a typo/hoax/something else that's been repeated often enough to be assumed to be true." Can anyone locate sources to establish this film exists? Muchness ( talk) 04:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep; consensus is that she scrapes by with an independent claim of notability. Mojo Hand ( talk) 04:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Though I am not a big fan of the WP:BLP1E argument, it seems clear to me that this woman is not notable outside of being married to Jack Black, and thus that this article is indeed a BLP1E. If there is any content here that cannot already be found at her husband's article, we should just merge it there (since it will almost certainly be about Black marrying her). Jinkinson talk to me 04:00, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:05, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Bigpoliticsfan ( talk) 02:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was merge to Ontario Highway 401. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 16:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
I hate to do this, because I was hoping to upgrade this article to be better. Unfortunately, I've been confounded by the absolute lack of sources on this topic. Aside from very brief mentions on Self-published roadgeek sites, a couple traffic camera names, and a label on a mapbook, there is no coverage of this. It's just a fancy highway transfer, variants of which appear on any local-express freeway setup.
So, with notability in question and few if any reliable sources to validate it, I'm nominating this for deletion. Floydian τ ¢ 02:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nationwide Building Society. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
This is an advert. Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:14, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
This is an advert. Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Article is an advert. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 00:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Not notable. Philafrenzy ( talk) 00:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)