Read how to nominate an article for deletion.
Former football player with 84 games, 71 at the semi-pro level, 13 in Switzerland's second-tier league. Sources are just roster listing sort of things. I don't think he meets WP:NSPORT. Here2rewrite ( talk) 16:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Article does not satisfy WP:GNG; no significant coverage on the school. N niyaz ( talk) 12:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
12:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
15:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and ENT. The claim to fame is that she appeared in a documentary about porn but isnt mentioned on the playbill for the film nor is she name checked in the Roger Ebert review of the film. Even if being un-named in a review and uncredited in the film counts, thats 1E territory. No objection to this being redirected to the film if deleted. Spartaz Humbug! 15:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
I was unable to find any WP:SIGCOV covering this team to meet the WP:GNG or WP:NTEAM, with only a few Facebook posts appearing in my BEFORE. The team does not appear to be ranked by the WBSC from what I can tell. Let'srun ( talk) 14:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NLIST due to a lack of coverage regarding these broadcasting teams. While individual broadcasters might be notable and they are covered in ESPN College Basketball, the teams themselves don't receive the same type of coverage. Let'srun ( talk) 13:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
This list is too broad in scope to ever be usefully complete. There are tens of thousands of archaeological sites in the world and most are notable. The current entries are a small fraction of just those sites we have articles on. We already have a list of archaeological sites by country (which is also very broad and should be split) to help people navigate by geography, as well as categories trees for Category:Archaeological sites by continent and Category:Archaeological sites by period, various templates and overview articles, etc. – Joe ( talk) 13:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. A supposed prime minister of a tiny island, not meeting WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Unsourced and no reliable sources were found online. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk • contribs) 11:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Lacking significant coverage per WP:NFF, draftify until receives more BOVINEBOY 2008 11:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Antálek played 90 minutes of professional football before being sent to lower leagues. I found nothing better than Teraz, a brief mention in squad list, but am not sure how reliable it is. Article fails WP:GNG without significant coverage overall. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBASKETBALL - was created in 2017 with heavy promotional material. The subject played primarily in an Australian second tier semi-professional league. There are no secondary or independent sources available. The subject is also basically an Orphan with it's only link being his father's page at Sedale Threatt. DaHuzyBru ( talk) 06:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The article has numerable issues, it relies on questionable sources, and as well as contains original research. But most of all, it seems to be a WP:POVFORK of Human rights abuses in Balochistan. It doesn’t have a really good verifiability argument. Any content that is reliable should be moved to the Human rights abuse page, as this page is better established and has more to say. This page just seems extremely unnecessary. VirtualVagabond ( talk) 05:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of meeting WP:NPRODUCT * Pppery * it has begun... 04:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:33, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This article has been edited a lot since its nomination. An assessment of new sources would be welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
I have been looking for third party references to support this article but can find none, especially on the exhibitions and grants and awards categories. In addition, there are no references, other than links to primary sources from the subject person. I believe this is not notable and falls under under WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE / WP:PRIMARY, and may violate WP:BASIC / WP:PHOTOGRAPHER / WP:AUTO. Maybe, if no references apply, the subject could be inserted into a relevant American photographer article. Shotgunheist 💬 04:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only primary sources provided. LibStar ( talk) 03:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable political candidate. Of the 4 sources cited on the page, 2 are his own website and 1 is Ballotpedia. No in-depth news coverage and no claim to notability. Holding a mid-level position in a union and serving on a state board does not entitle someone to a Wikipedia page. Page creator seems to have a personal connection to Kerr, judging by the fact that they uploaded several pictures of him on Commons and tagged them as "own work." BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 02:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Upon review of article and its sources, the person in question does not meet the notability guidelines in question: the person is not (1) cited by 3rd party sources other than websites that repeat his bio as an official founder of Samuel Adams beer (2) known for originating a new concept [see point #1] (3) become a significant monument, etc. (4) He is not cited as by peers and 3rd party sources for the work that is well-known or significant. The article was written by a blocked user and could primarily serve the purpose of self promotion as defined in WP:NOTADVERT. P3D7AQ09M6 ( talk)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We need to hear from more editors as the nominator states they didn't mean to nominate this article (so a withdrawal of sorts) but an editor is arguing for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable school does not satisfy WP:GNG, some editor decided to remove PROD with no improvements what so ever. N niyaz ( talk) 00:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
this is one of the few schools that predates the founding of Malaysia, and the request was fulfilled on July 17, restoring the article. The PROD tag was correctly removed by an admin as part of the undeletion process. Bsoyka ( t • c • g) 05:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
'one of the few schools that predates the founding of Malaysia'does not explain its failure in satisfying WP:GNG. For your information, there are thousands of schools that predates Malaysia's independence. And unless this school is a high achieving school which is rare, I don't see the school showing any significance. N niyaz ( talk) 11:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
I still stand by my earlier reasoning for this page to remain, being: historical and a pre-Malaysia school that has contributed to the early nation-building. C.M. Au Yong ( talk) 03:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need to hear more opinions. Also, editors, please sign all of your comments in an AFD discussion so that other editors know whose opinion they are. We shouldn't have to look at the page history to find this out.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The provided sources are mentions and stats pages. Nothing else is available in Google. Shinadamina ( talk) 01:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The subject doesn't appear to have significant coverage in reliable sources. The references presently being used don't establish notability. toweli ( talk) 01:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The subject doesn't appear to have significant coverage in reliable sources. The references presently being used don't establish notability. toweli ( talk) 01:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The term is indeed used in India. However, I don't think it has scope beyond a definition. It can be easily integrated in Fake news in India#Modes of distribution ( WP:CFORK). Although start-class, it pretty much looks like a future repository for dumping all fake news spread on WhatsApp. For serious cases, there is already Indian WhatsApp lynchings. Gan Favourite ( talk) 14:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we have a clearer discussion of the sources and whether they contain significant coverage of the topic? A source table would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
asilvering (
talk)
00:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
This doesn't meet WP:NLIST / WP:GNG. It has no assertion of notability or references. Boleyn ( talk) 22:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Again, this article is deceptively written, creating an initial impression that it meets the criteria of WP:NCORP unless scrutinized closely. Critically fails WP:ORGCRIT, There is not even a single source from the article or WP:BEFORE to establish any context of notability. Being a nominee of The Beatz Awards is not significant enough to make it presumptively notable. Over all, fails WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 22:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Promotional page for non-notable engineer and public speaker. I couldn't find any reliable sources via Google News or Newsbank Database (wider and deeper than Google). Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF, WP:AUTHOR. Cabrils ( talk) 00:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Not sure this person passes WP:NACTOR, mostly minor roles. Can't find any reliable sources discussing them apart from the cited nytimes source which isn't specifically about Intiraymi, but mentions him in passing in 3 paragraphs of a rather long piece about the state of the entertainment industry in LA in the late 1990s. Other sources I have been able to find are Star Trek fansites, which I wouldn't consider significant coverage. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 00:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Read how to nominate an article for deletion.
Former football player with 84 games, 71 at the semi-pro level, 13 in Switzerland's second-tier league. Sources are just roster listing sort of things. I don't think he meets WP:NSPORT. Here2rewrite ( talk) 16:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Article does not satisfy WP:GNG; no significant coverage on the school. N niyaz ( talk) 12:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
12:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
15:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails GNG and ENT. The claim to fame is that she appeared in a documentary about porn but isnt mentioned on the playbill for the film nor is she name checked in the Roger Ebert review of the film. Even if being un-named in a review and uncredited in the film counts, thats 1E territory. No objection to this being redirected to the film if deleted. Spartaz Humbug! 15:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
I was unable to find any WP:SIGCOV covering this team to meet the WP:GNG or WP:NTEAM, with only a few Facebook posts appearing in my BEFORE. The team does not appear to be ranked by the WBSC from what I can tell. Let'srun ( talk) 14:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Subject does not meet the WP:NLIST due to a lack of coverage regarding these broadcasting teams. While individual broadcasters might be notable and they are covered in ESPN College Basketball, the teams themselves don't receive the same type of coverage. Let'srun ( talk) 13:54, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
This list is too broad in scope to ever be usefully complete. There are tens of thousands of archaeological sites in the world and most are notable. The current entries are a small fraction of just those sites we have articles on. We already have a list of archaeological sites by country (which is also very broad and should be split) to help people navigate by geography, as well as categories trees for Category:Archaeological sites by continent and Category:Archaeological sites by period, various templates and overview articles, etc. – Joe ( talk) 13:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewed during NPP. A supposed prime minister of a tiny island, not meeting WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Unsourced and no reliable sources were found online. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk • contribs) 11:49, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Lacking significant coverage per WP:NFF, draftify until receives more BOVINEBOY 2008 11:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Antálek played 90 minutes of professional football before being sent to lower leagues. I found nothing better than Teraz, a brief mention in squad list, but am not sure how reliable it is. Article fails WP:GNG without significant coverage overall. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBASKETBALL - was created in 2017 with heavy promotional material. The subject played primarily in an Australian second tier semi-professional league. There are no secondary or independent sources available. The subject is also basically an Orphan with it's only link being his father's page at Sedale Threatt. DaHuzyBru ( talk) 06:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The article has numerable issues, it relies on questionable sources, and as well as contains original research. But most of all, it seems to be a WP:POVFORK of Human rights abuses in Balochistan. It doesn’t have a really good verifiability argument. Any content that is reliable should be moved to the Human rights abuse page, as this page is better established and has more to say. This page just seems extremely unnecessary. VirtualVagabond ( talk) 05:45, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
No evidence of meeting WP:NPRODUCT * Pppery * it has begun... 04:24, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
05:33, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This article has been edited a lot since its nomination. An assessment of new sources would be welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
04:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
I have been looking for third party references to support this article but can find none, especially on the exhibitions and grants and awards categories. In addition, there are no references, other than links to primary sources from the subject person. I believe this is not notable and falls under under WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE / WP:PRIMARY, and may violate WP:BASIC / WP:PHOTOGRAPHER / WP:AUTO. Maybe, if no references apply, the subject could be inserted into a relevant American photographer article. Shotgunheist 💬 04:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only primary sources provided. LibStar ( talk) 03:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Non-notable political candidate. Of the 4 sources cited on the page, 2 are his own website and 1 is Ballotpedia. No in-depth news coverage and no claim to notability. Holding a mid-level position in a union and serving on a state board does not entitle someone to a Wikipedia page. Page creator seems to have a personal connection to Kerr, judging by the fact that they uploaded several pictures of him on Commons and tagged them as "own work." BottleOfChocolateMilk ( talk) 02:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Upon review of article and its sources, the person in question does not meet the notability guidelines in question: the person is not (1) cited by 3rd party sources other than websites that repeat his bio as an official founder of Samuel Adams beer (2) known for originating a new concept [see point #1] (3) become a significant monument, etc. (4) He is not cited as by peers and 3rd party sources for the work that is well-known or significant. The article was written by a blocked user and could primarily serve the purpose of self promotion as defined in WP:NOTADVERT. P3D7AQ09M6 ( talk)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We need to hear from more editors as the nominator states they didn't mean to nominate this article (so a withdrawal of sorts) but an editor is arguing for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Unnotable school does not satisfy WP:GNG, some editor decided to remove PROD with no improvements what so ever. N niyaz ( talk) 00:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
this is one of the few schools that predates the founding of Malaysia, and the request was fulfilled on July 17, restoring the article. The PROD tag was correctly removed by an admin as part of the undeletion process. Bsoyka ( t • c • g) 05:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
'one of the few schools that predates the founding of Malaysia'does not explain its failure in satisfying WP:GNG. For your information, there are thousands of schools that predates Malaysia's independence. And unless this school is a high achieving school which is rare, I don't see the school showing any significance. N niyaz ( talk) 11:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
I still stand by my earlier reasoning for this page to remain, being: historical and a pre-Malaysia school that has contributed to the early nation-building. C.M. Au Yong ( talk) 03:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need to hear more opinions. Also, editors, please sign all of your comments in an AFD discussion so that other editors know whose opinion they are. We shouldn't have to look at the page history to find this out.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
01:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The provided sources are mentions and stats pages. Nothing else is available in Google. Shinadamina ( talk) 01:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The subject doesn't appear to have significant coverage in reliable sources. The references presently being used don't establish notability. toweli ( talk) 01:24, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The subject doesn't appear to have significant coverage in reliable sources. The references presently being used don't establish notability. toweli ( talk) 01:23, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
The term is indeed used in India. However, I don't think it has scope beyond a definition. It can be easily integrated in Fake news in India#Modes of distribution ( WP:CFORK). Although start-class, it pretty much looks like a future repository for dumping all fake news spread on WhatsApp. For serious cases, there is already Indian WhatsApp lynchings. Gan Favourite ( talk) 14:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Doczilla
Ohhhhhh, no!
20:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we have a clearer discussion of the sources and whether they contain significant coverage of the topic? A source table would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
asilvering (
talk)
00:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
This doesn't meet WP:NLIST / WP:GNG. It has no assertion of notability or references. Boleyn ( talk) 22:32, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Again, this article is deceptively written, creating an initial impression that it meets the criteria of WP:NCORP unless scrutinized closely. Critically fails WP:ORGCRIT, There is not even a single source from the article or WP:BEFORE to establish any context of notability. Being a nominee of The Beatz Awards is not significant enough to make it presumptively notable. Over all, fails WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 22:14, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
00:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Promotional page for non-notable engineer and public speaker. I couldn't find any reliable sources via Google News or Newsbank Database (wider and deeper than Google). Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF, WP:AUTHOR. Cabrils ( talk) 00:15, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Not sure this person passes WP:NACTOR, mostly minor roles. Can't find any reliable sources discussing them apart from the cited nytimes source which isn't specifically about Intiraymi, but mentions him in passing in 3 paragraphs of a rather long piece about the state of the entertainment industry in LA in the late 1990s. Other sources I have been able to find are Star Trek fansites, which I wouldn't consider significant coverage. Hemiauchenia ( talk) 00:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)