This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi, Bamboo Airways currently does not operate any Boeing 787. The first 787 leased from GECAS will be delivered this month. -- Tomasprg ( talk) 11:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

I don’t know anyting about this, could you provide some sources to confirm that? Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 17:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I have added a citation to the article, the Bamboo Airways official Press Release released on October 24, 2019 here. I reverted your editing. Can you prove that Bamboo Airways already operates a Boeing 787? -- Tomasprg ( talk) 18:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Please do not put incorrect information in the article Bamboo Airways. Bamboo Airways does not operate any Boeing 787 aircraft now. I have cited a source of information that is official and newer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomasprg ( talk • contribs) 00:25, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

???. What do you mean? You are the person giving false information, not me. You are new in here so read the rules before editing. Cheers :))) Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 04:53, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm adding a few more links: here, here, here. I have not seen any evidence from your side that Bamboo Airways has Boeing 787 in its fleet at the moment. -- Tomasprg ( talk) 10:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Ref 1 and 2 are not reliable, ref 3 said they are take deliveries for 2 Boeing 787-9 so those aircrafts are in their fleet. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 12:32, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Why did you undo my updated of the Lufthansa fleet that I made last night? (My IP Adress has changed since I made the edit) 2601:640:C002:9300:C858:2557:8DC9:60E3 ( talk) 21:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Reason on the summary. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 04:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

What part of it was unsourced? 2601:640:C002:9300:951E:55AF:4B1A:B1BA ( talk) 09:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

You didn’t give any source when editing so it’s unsourced. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 14:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

The source I used was already cited on the page, so all I did was change the the date in the reference. 2601:640:C002:9300:253E:F17A:ABD2:7691 ( talk) 22:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Why is Planespotters.net not a reliable source? 2601:640:C002:9300:1199:7276:7E8E:2B5A ( talk) 16:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Self-published source. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 17:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't understand what you mean? 2601:640:C002:9300:1199:7276:7E8E:2B5A ( talk) 17:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Planespotters.net is self-published source. Actually don’t usually use them when we have a better source 😅. Please read Wikipedia policy to know more. Thanks for asking! Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 18:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

What sites would be better sources? 2601:640:C002:9300:C955:3965:7706:8599 ( talk) 19:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, please advise why my edit was deemed "not related". It has been added into the section "Loyalty programme", explaining where its name comes from. Thanks Goodwillgames ( talk) 12:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Extensive information about the airline's frequent flyer program and amenities, etc should not be included. Remember that Wikipedia is not a travel guide so please focus on aircraft and airline destinations. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 12:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

By focusing on airline destinations we would make a travel guide; by focusing on etymology of the Air Line names and schemes we make an encyclopedia. Aircraft models and routes’ details are already well available in the company’s website, whilst additions such as mine give alternative information to the corporate ones. By removing my entry, you just made the explanation of the whole company’s product less comprehensive. I intend to revert your edit and bring it to the Talk page for others to comment Goodwillgames ( talk) 13:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok, go ahead Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 14:11, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

• Greetings, Nguyen QuocTrung. The reference in question about the TAP fleet is this one: https://www.dinheirovivo.pt/empresas/tap-ja-tem-uma-frota-com-100-avioes-estima-receber-mais-10-neste-ano/. It is in portuguese, the title being "TAP already has a fleet with 100 airplanes and expects to receive more then in this year.". In the corporate website of TAP, in english, there is an indication that the company has now more than 100 airplanes. Maybe we could put something such as "100+" in the fleet size, in the infobox? Thank you in advance and best regards, -- ajpvalente ( talk) 14:49, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

No, we need exact numbers of aircraft in the infobox, not "100+". And if you want to update the infobox, you have to update the fleet table as well. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 15:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Right, I understand. Considering this was the latest news report about this subject, can we at least update the fleet numbers based on this, to 100 or 110? Thank you, -- ajpvalente ( talk) 16:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Nope, I don’t think so, we need to update the number of aircraft in the fleet table. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 18:14, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. However, I am not sure what really is the problem. You need to know precisely the number of airplanes of each type and model? -- ajpvalente ( talk) 10:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello Nguyen QuocTrung, I just realized you removed my edit on Etihad Airways codeshare partners because I didn't provide a source for adding Avianca. Well, the source was already there on cite note number 58 (the general cite note, which takes you to https://www.etihad.com/en-ae/fly-etihad/our-partners (the airline's official site) and you can find Avianca over there.

It prolly was my mistake for having edited the list without pointing out cite number 58 as the source. Now that I have explained the reason, please do not revert the edit again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mekanos ( talk • contribs) 19:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for your explanation, next time please write the source on the summary section to minimize the risk of being reverted. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 06:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello Nguyen QuocTrung, I saw that you removed my edit on Logan International Airport citing the lack of a reliable source. So, you're telling me that the actual airline itself is only a "booking site" and not a reliable source despite the site showing the new routes?

Well, on other pages, such as Asheville Regional Airport, McGhee Tyson Airport, Northern Kentucky International Airport, Newark Liberty International Airport the same type of citation was prexisting and accepted. This one: Fort Walton Beach Airport has no citations at all Please go nitpick those edits as well if my citation is so unacceptable.

I have re-added the edit I made, with a more appropriate citation to the standard of the other citations on the page.

Well, those articles you listed is not on my watchlist so I can’t check them. Btw, thanks for re-edit on Logan International Airport. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 14:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Please do not revert my changes as they match the already cited source.

Who are you? Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 10:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm Tram2 I work for KLM as a Duty Director. The source I cite is an official KLM publication. So who are you? Why do you keep reverting my changes as I did cite them.

Wow, I’m appreciating your work but you’re editing unsourced and you need to stop that. Thanks. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 16:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

What is wrong with this source "Fleet". KLM. Retrieved 15 January 2020. as it is an official KLM publication? At least much more reliable than "KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Fleet Details and History". Planespotters.net. Retrieved 5 December 2019.{{ cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status ( link) ^{unreliable source?} which is just a site for hobbyists.

This source closely affiliated with the subject so it’s not a third party source, please read Examples section on WP:IS. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 08:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Well, at least it is accurate. And the numbers shown on the wikipage are not. KLM has 8 747's in the fleet. PH-BFH, PH-BFL, PH-BFN, PH-BFY are full pax. PH-BFS, PH-BFT, PH-BFV, PH-BFW are combined pax/cargo aircraft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tram2 ( talk • contribs) 08:44, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

But how can I know those numbers are accurate or not? Sorry, maybe your source published by KLM but we can’t use that here because it violated Wikipedia policy. Could you find any independent source which provides the right number? Thanks and keep supporting Wikipedia. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 08:56, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Well I'm tired of the discussion. Now I know how reliable Wikipedia is. It prefers a independent hobbyist site over a check-able company source. I'll stop donating and contributing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tram2 ( talk • contribs) 09:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Sadly but Wikipedia work like that. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 09:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Hey there, I saw you reverted my edit. I saw American Mainline service beginning in April on the Harrisburg Wikipedia page. Could you please look into that before closing this case? Thanks! -Fantech

I’m sorry, what Wikipedia page? Could you provide the link for me? Thanks. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 17:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I understand now but in Wikipedia, when you editing, you have to provide the source to prove you’re right. So I still have to reverting your edits. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 17:49, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

No problem. I understand to. Thanks! -Fantech

It was the same source cited originally. Yes, Twitter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.176.159.64 ( talk) 16:37, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Mole mole 2 ( talk) 12:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

I didn’t, actually you’re the person who vandalized it. I’ve been working for a long time and always follow Wikipedia rules. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 12:46, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

It is wrong. You don't know what "Gallery" is. Gallery means a state where many images are arranged. This is the only image I have added. Nevertheless, you removed this from here. This is too violent vandalism. I will request your post block soon. If you don't like it, answer the next question. Why did you remove only this image ? There are many other images on this page, why did you remove only this ?-- Mole mole 2 ( talk) 13:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

If you really want to add this image, don’t put that in fleet section, create your gallery in there. And you thinks you can block me? You could try it, I’ll wait. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 15:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

You said that my image should not put in "fleet" section. So, I put it "History" section. Is it OK ? If I put image in "History", Sentences and image become connect so will become more lucid.-- Mole mole 2 ( talk) 05:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

I thinks it’s okay for me. No problems. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 06:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

So sorry if you think my edits are wrong because I do not know the correct way of editing and publishing, and stating the correct reason for the edits. But, I can confidently say that my edits on the airlines and destinations do not need sources because I work in the airport itself and I am handling all the flights inbound and outbound of Singapore. Well I can also safely say that there are a few destinations that are not stated in the page. idboizz ( talk) 16:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Rookie mistake, I got mixed up and saw your comment in page history thinking that it was on the main article page (and I thus thought it was vandalism). Please be aware it was not intentional. My apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tezakhiago ( talk • contribs) 20:45, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

No problem, be careful next time. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 20:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

You don't understand because you didn't look at the news that the case in Canada has been confirmed https://3g.dxy.cn/newh5/view/pneumonia Eray08yigit ( talk) 06:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

See talk page

They just want a second lab to verify, however by the standards used by every other country both cases are confirmed. Maplesyrupcan ( talk) 17:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Has it not been confirmed now that the suspected case in Canada is real? Ask ehx udnd ( talk) 08:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Both are confirmed. Maplesyrupcan ( talk) 17:16, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Nguyen QuocTrung.

1) Please stop reverting other people's edits on the case total on China. Just because their number doesn't match the number on dxy.cn doesn't mean it's wrong. dxy.cn has made mistakes too. 2) If you're aware of some MOS thing that discourages footnotes, then take it to the discussion on the Talk page, and we'll have a group discussion. In the meantime, stop reverting my footnote. -- Jw 193 ( talk) 17:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Did you check https://ncov.dxy.cn/ncovh5/view/pneumonia

It does say 11,844 for China now. We should at least try to reflect the given sources. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 06:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Never mind, this number would include HongKong, Macau, and Taiwan... After subtraction it works out. Apologies. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 06:36, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Read this news and this. It is almost impossible to get an official figure statistics released through their government website when even their current population statistics is sourced from UN estimate. The censorship there is unlike in Vietnam and Mainland China government where statistics is readily available.  Ṉight Ḻantern  ^🏮 08:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Oh, just because you can’t provide the official information for NK infected people so you using not-reliable source South Korean newspaper writes about North Korean? Sorry but those sources you provide are not trustworthy so they cannot be adding into the table. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 09:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Okay then I'm letting you to find any official government links and sources from that country if you were able to find any. I'll stop at this right now.  Ṉight Ḻantern  ^🏮 09:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Haha, I know I can’t find anything from that country but at least you should use WHO or UN sources, not some not-trustworthy South Korean newspaper always writes bad things about NK. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 09:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Mmm, if we were going to talk about news outlet that doesn't have any connection with South Korea, there is one English language news headquartered in Pyongyang named The Pyongyang Times ( link). But I am really wondering why they don't even publish any single news regarding the virus outbreak in their country, that is why I said the censorship in that country are particularly too silly if they even hide health disasters related matters from the public. Since North Korea is already globally known as hermit kingdom..I don't think the WHO and UN were able to give exact data on that country more when the latter is already with lots of heavy issues with the organisation.  Ṉight Ḻantern  ^🏮 09:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, we could using this source. Because their headquarters located in Pyongyang, “The Pyongyang Times” is very reputable for many newspaper around the world when they want to writes about NK. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 10:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

There is more news outlet from that country from what I have checked here. I just read some of the links, but similarly like the South Korean news, the mostly featured are propagandas rather than other important issues. If you were able to translate and found some important contents on the virus in any of the North Korean news websites, feel free to add them on the table figures since I don't always have the time to update the table.  Ṉight Ḻantern  ^🏮 10:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

For now I only able to find two news on their counter-measures against the virus, one from Pyongyang Times and the other from Rodong.  Ṉight Ḻantern  ^🏮 10:20, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Rodong also OK, if you find any info about the infected person on those source, please add NK into the table. Thanks and have a nice day:))) Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 10:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sujeong-ro (Seongnam), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your edit warring on the 2019-20 Coronavirus Outbreak template is getting ridiculous. Ultimograph5 ( talk) 14:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Not related, I’m reverting Japan cases, not Iran. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 15:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I report you the first recovery case in Italy, here the source http://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/topnews/2020/02/21/coronavirusspallanzaniitaliano-guarito_eff4b3fa-ed87-4bcf-bc2a-9d27800cbd78.html. Please update the info in the template, thanks very much -- Samuele Madini ( talk) 15:21, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, but you should write that reference on the article talk page and someone will do that for you. I’m very busy so sometimes I can’t read your messages. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 15:51, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thanks again -- 37.119.153.138 ( talk) 16:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

In this edit, you updated the South Korean numbers without adding a reliable source. Please be reminded that this is against WP:V. You should place the source inside the article, not your edit summary. An edit summary is only used to provide a brief summary of an edit per H:ES. Hayman30 ( talk) 09:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Hi, I found that you updated the death of South Korea, and I am sure that the death of South Korea is 29 by now. Based on reliable Korean sources, it seems that BNO news made a mistake. They must have seen the number of recoveries as the number of deaths. Check out these sources(It's in Korean, but check out the numbers) - 28/29 is the number of deaths, and 34 is the number of recoveries. http://ncov.mohw.go.kr/tcmBoardView.do?brdId=&brdGubun=&dataGubun=&ncvContSeq=353300&contSeq=353300&board_id=&gubun=ALL https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=102&oid=020&aid=0003273070 Luke Kern Choi 5 ( talk) 05:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC) In conclusion, I'll fix the number in template! Luke Kern Choi 5 ( talk) 05:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree with you, seems like they make a mistake, thanks Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 05:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

The ref currently present for Germany does not support the number. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 18:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

BNO is no longer a core source per the talk page and is NOT the reference associated with the content in question. Stating a reference in the edit summary is not sufficient Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 18:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Hey, I saw that Guernsey had its own slot in the Coronavirus template. Jersey reported its first case soon after [1], so it should be added as well. -- Ratherous ( talk) 09:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I didn’t know that, will add this to the table right away. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 10:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Ratherous ( talk) 10:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

I see you removed Northern Cyprus from the table. Since you have a view on this you should join in the discussion here: Template talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data#RfC on countries/dependencies which also talks about the question of inclusion of this region. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 05:48, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Thanks Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 07:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

You have degraded the numbers of "Diamond Princess" twice by using by Ref.1. As the number is not updated, DO NOT use it and NEVER degrade again. Yasuo Miyakawa ( talk) 15:26, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Whoa, calm down buddy. Could you provided the source said Diamond Princess have 712 cases? Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 16:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

As is indicated, the other Ref.18 of Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is the authoritative source:新型コロナウイルス感染症について (in Japanese)
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000164708_00001.html
Although there is English page, it is not frequently updated. Therefore Japanese page is indicated as the source.
https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/newpage_00032.html
And Ref.1 is NOT updated at all. Never degrade. Yasuo Miyakawa ( talk) 21:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Nguyen QuocTrung. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Sujeong-ro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 22:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 ( COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

El_C 14:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. El_C 15:12, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Don’t you see ref 3? I’m contributing for Wikipedia for a long time and never editing unsourced. Thanks Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 15:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Can you substantiate that vnexpress.net is a reliable source, though? El_C 15:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Vnexpress is the most trusted online newspaper in Vietnam, and ref 3 is from Vietnam Ministry of Health Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 15:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for clarifying. El_C 15:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

I think next time you should see the reference others editor provide and have a talk rather than threatening to block them. Thanks. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 15:35, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

When there is no reference attributed, I issue stern warning. It's just the way it is. El_C 15:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, just saying. Many vandal out there and you have to be cautious. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 15:43, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

I don't understand what you're trying to say. El_C 15:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

So this is a false warning or not? Because I provided the source already. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 15:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Vietnam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lai Chau ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2019–20 outbreak of North East Respiratory Syndrome(NERS) (NERS-nCoV). Since you had some involvement with the 2019–20 outbreak of North East Respiratory Syndrome(NERS) (NERS-nCoV) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Carl Fredrik ^talk 05:53, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I see Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 07:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

52nd Infantry Division (South Korea) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Division

56th Infantry Division (South Korea) ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Division

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Your addition to COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 15:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, 75th Infantry Division (South Korea), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep ^Talk 20:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello,

Good afternoon, I am not sure about it. The travel for Delta Air Lines special seasonal nonstop from Seattle to Osaka-Kansai and I can't believe read check on the internet list the travel for the information and you for sure?

I am a deaf in the Seattle Area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmaryahJohnson1996 ( talk • contribs) 22:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry but I do not understand what you are saying? In Wikipedia, any information lacking a reliable source directly supporting it will be removed. This is the the reason why I reverted you edit. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 04:25, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

@ AmaryahJohnson1996 this service will not be resumed next year as per https://www.routesonline.com/news/38/airlineroute/293288/delta-ns21-long-haul-operation-changes-as-of-23aug20/. 172.223.6.230 ( talk) 15:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I see, but next time when editing you should add some sources into the article. Have a good weekend. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 17:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Your addition to COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 20:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Good night, Mr. Nguyen QuocTrung

I happen to see your revision for my addition in IZ*ONE's pages - DVD & Blu-ray section. I appreciate your concern to maintain the information quality in Wikipedia sites.

I just want to have a friendly conversation as I am still a beginner contributor in Wikipedia. You stated that the update about DVD & Blu-ray seemed like an Ad to you. I made that update because I found the same information regarding to DVD & Blu-ray in "Twice" and "Blackpink" pages. Those information appear to have been written down and lasts for a long time, up until now. So, why can't I do the same for IZ*ONE's pages? After reviewing this discussion, do you think I can write it back?

I purely ask for guidance since I am still confused about this issue.

Thank you very much for your attention, Sir. Alvin Kashiwagi ( talk) 12:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, about this issue, you should remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and those information you just added about DVD and Blu-ray are not notable and important enough to include them into the article. If you want to know more, read this WP:SUBNOT. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 12:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Miami International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 09:17, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, my mistake, the ref was added. Please check. -- Marcetw ( talk) 17:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Please note that the moving schedule for all airlines to the new Berlin Brandenburg Airport is widely published on its website and eurowings.com. Best regards.

I know but please add reference into the article Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 09:12, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Then how about not simply deleting everything at first? As the move is widely known additional citations are not really necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.174.161.101 ( talk) 09:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

You are too lazy that can’t added reference into the article for future checking? Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 09:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Bởi tổng số ca Covid19 ngày 19/12 là 1.411, 20/12 là 1.413 (tăng 2 ca), ngày 21/12 là 1.414 (tăng 1 ca), giảm 1 ca. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leorto95 ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Có nghĩa bạn tính theo tốc độ tăng ca nhiễm chứ ko phải tính tổng số lượng à? Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 17:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history " Military Historian of the Year" and " Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

The Timeline section of COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam is too long and will be even longer in the future. Can we consider split it under Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam? Westfan ( talk) 05:54, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

I couldn’t agree more, we should split this section. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 06:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Your edit to COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa ( talk) 13:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

@ Nguyen QuocTrung: Can you create a map like this based on the percentage shown here? I think it is more relevant than this map. Ltn12345 ( talk) 12:09, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

The label can be <1%, 1-2%, 2-5%, 5-10%, >10% Ltn12345 ( talk) 12:11, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

@ Ltn12345: What a coincidence, i received your request while creating vaccination percentage map, maybe in a few hours I will publish it. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 12:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Tigray War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi @ Nguyen QuocTrung: do you think you could help updating the statistical data of the COVID-19 pandemic in Cambodia page? The regular editor is no longer editing the page frequently. Thank you. Joplin201017 ( talk) 12:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, I can do that. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 13:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Joplin201017 ( talk) 13:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia which make articles less accurate. My edits to the Logan International Airport /* Passenger */ section were completely consistent with standard practice across airport Wikipedia articles: airlines often suspend or discontinue service, particularly during the pandemic, without making any formal announcement or without press coverage. The article for any large airport does not have references cited for each and every airline and destination. That is not standard practice. Your reversions seem more like territory marking through the selective application of guidance rather than creating the most accurate information in the article. As you would have it, the article reads like these airlines are all flying into Logan now, although they are not and in most cases have not been in over 18 months? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfiner ( talk • contribs) 16:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

But how can I know your edits are correct or not if you don't provide the source? Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 17:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas ( discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction ( discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 ( discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip ( discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 ( discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 ( discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors ( ?) ω = 250,600 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper ( discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A ( discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War ( discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps ( discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten ( discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection ( discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality ( discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality ( discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines ( discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation ( discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability ( discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability ( discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines ( discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack ( discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States ( discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways ( discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages ( discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon ( discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) ( discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 ( discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 ( discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International ( discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet ( discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations ( discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra ( discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy ( discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz ( discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll ( discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Template:COVID-19 pandemic in Vietnam statistics chart in 2020 and 2021 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

		COVID-19 Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to COVID-19. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 8 March 2022 (UTC)

• Wow, thank you very much for this barnstar. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 06:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Nguyen QuocTrung

Thank you for creating Malindo Air.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the redirect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I ( Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Dear Nguyen QuocTrung, hello!

I noticed that you understand Korean and edited the article Saemangeum Seawall in the past. Recently I expanded the Russian version of the article, but some information is missing and I cannot find it in English (unfortunately, I don't understand Korean). I am interested in technical information about the structure of the dam and the construction process. Can you find any sources in Korean with these details? It would help me a lot.

Thank you, Rijikk ( talk) 06:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Yes, just wait a while and I will provide some sources for you, did you try Google auto-translate on your device? It really helps a lot. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 11:43, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Here are few sources I found:

• History of Seamangeum area before the seawall was built: https://m.pressian.com/m/pages/articles/2021112720514921916#0DKW (ancient history, maybe you will like it)
• During the construction: http://weekly.chosun.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=742 (Environmental activists have organized protests to prevent the construction of the seawall according to a construction engineer at the end of the article)
• Composition of the seawall: https://www.gunsan.go.kr/main/m298 (government's website)
• How the seawall was made: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPIyEFg0RJs& (Korean Transportation Ministry's Youtube)

Hope you find some interesting info. Nguyen QuocTrung ( talk) 12:21, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you very much! The links look very good. I did try using Google auto-translate but the translations from Korean are quite poor, and anyway I consider it last resort after I try all the other options. Now I will try to bring the article to a Good article level using these sources. Thank you again, Rijikk ( talk) 16:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)