Hello, Ratherous, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 13:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
I heard you know how to edit maps. I don't. The Kyoto protocol map has not been updated in over two years, and it's really getting on my nerves. Could you update it or tell me how to do it. Thank you for your time. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 19:04, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Scorpions13256, Which map are you referring to specifically, and what updates would you like to add? -- Ratherous ( talk) 02:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
I was reverting the IP. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 11:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, just a quick reminder to make sure you update the 'as of' date in the infobox when you update the map. — Smjg ( talk) 11:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Can you add a new color?
- 50000+ Confirmed cases
- 10000-49999 Confirmed cases
- 1000-9999 Confirmed cases
- 100-999 Confirmed cases
- 10-99 Confirmed cases
- 1-9 Confirmed cases
Now that 4 countries (China, Italy, USA, and Spain) have above 50,000 it makes sense to add a new color. Humiebees ( talk) 23:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Could you justify your addition of Gabon to the Africa map? You didn't say anything on the talk page, and according to our LGBT in Gabon article, there's no evidence the law has been applied, which would mean the country might should be yellow, not orange. — kwami ( talk) 09:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, the law is very new, so I think it would be inappropriate of us to automatically assume it was passed to simply be an inactive piece of legislation. I believe that until there is further evidence showing that the law has not been applied for a long period of time, then Gabon should definitely be coloured yellow instead of orange. -- Ratherous ( talk) 05:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Kwamikagami:, Hi I'm not sure if you saw my response, but I just saw that you changed Gabon to yellow anyway. Could you explain your reasoning for that? Do you have evidence that the new law was approved without the intention of being applied? -- Ratherous ( talk) 07:04, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ratherous. According to the latest refs in our article, the law hasn't been implemented yet. It would be CRYSTAL to assume it will be. (Though of course by now it very likely has been, if we can find a ref.) Also, we use yellow for countries that haven't imprisoned anyone in the past 3 years. That convention was based on existing laws, of course, not new ones, but has anyone even been charged yet? We could also leave the country grey until we have a RS that the law is actually in force. It's just a bit weird to color Gabon for imprisoning people when it hasn't happened and we don't even know that it would be legal to do so. — kwami ( talk) 07:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- @ Kwamikagami:, I think colouring it grey should definitely be out of the question as the law is already on the books, and after looking around I found this source saying two men have already been arrested [1]. Let me know what you think. -- Ratherous ( talk) 07:57, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
the criminal law against same-sexual activity is still enforced in Myanmar according to this article and this homosexuality map should reflect it. One enforcement of the law cited is from 2018. I'm also notifying User:Kwamikagami, User:Kaleetan and User:Fenetrejones by simple mentioning.
I also wonder whether the criminal law of Ethiopia against homosexuality is no longer enforced even though it was removed in March 2019 from the list of pardonable offenses, which points towards the opposite as I think. In this Medium article from 2020, the Ethiopian author states that the threat of imprisonment, which means the application of the law, still goes on or can be perceived. In another report from 2015, it said however that the law was generally not enforced.
Please review whether Antarctica can be removed from the map because it is not needed in any way.
Please reassess whether it is always found out correctly that there were no prosecutions. Some countries or regions of countries issue prosecution reports with the numbers of reports and likely subsequent prosecutions. Only for the reason that a prosecution has not become public, it does not mean at all that there had not been any prosecutions. I am currently not sure about editing SVG files and the topic can at times be in some ways difficult to deal with, considering such laws. HeliosX ( talk) 02:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- In yellow countries, people may live in fear of arrest or imprisonment -- the fact that a law hasn't been enforced for a while doesn't mean it can't be enforced tomorrow, and the police may use that fear to extort money from people. But orange means actual prison. I added stripes for cases where people are being arrested but not prosecuted. In the case of Burma, his employee changed him with assault. That's a different issue, even if the law involved is the same. We can't include every nuance of the law on a simple map. If people are not being arrested, prosecuted or imprisoned for consensual sex, then IMO the country should remain yellow.
- If you have any evidence for enforcement in Ethiopia, please let us know. — kwami ( talk) 04:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Until enough signatures are turned in to force a referendum, marriage equality is scheduled to occur on a specific day, which counts as being listed with an asterisk. If the referendum is guaranteed, then it should be removed from the template. Naraht ( talk) 11:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- It actually can't be confirmed because the legislation allows a period of 100 days where it becomes a question of whether or not the next step will be applicable, menaing the legislation process has not yet ended. The template shouldn't rush into predicting the turnout of the process per
WP:CRYSTAL. --
Ratherous (
talk) 23:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Also I was just curious what was the specific date? I just personally haven't seen any articles confirming a date. -- Ratherous ( talk) 23:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ITN recognition for Vladimir Zhirinovsky
On 9 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Vladimir Zhirinovsky, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 16:59, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Ratherous, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 13:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
I heard you know how to edit maps. I don't. The Kyoto protocol map has not been updated in over two years, and it's really getting on my nerves. Could you update it or tell me how to do it. Thank you for your time. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 19:04, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
- Scorpions13256, Which map are you referring to specifically, and what updates would you like to add? -- Ratherous ( talk) 02:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
I was reverting the IP. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 11:23, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi, just a quick reminder to make sure you update the 'as of' date in the infobox when you update the map. — Smjg ( talk) 11:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Can you add a new color?
- 50000+ Confirmed cases
- 10000-49999 Confirmed cases
- 1000-9999 Confirmed cases
- 100-999 Confirmed cases
- 10-99 Confirmed cases
- 1-9 Confirmed cases
Now that 4 countries (China, Italy, USA, and Spain) have above 50,000 it makes sense to add a new color. Humiebees ( talk) 23:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Could you justify your addition of Gabon to the Africa map? You didn't say anything on the talk page, and according to our LGBT in Gabon article, there's no evidence the law has been applied, which would mean the country might should be yellow, not orange. — kwami ( talk) 09:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, the law is very new, so I think it would be inappropriate of us to automatically assume it was passed to simply be an inactive piece of legislation. I believe that until there is further evidence showing that the law has not been applied for a long period of time, then Gabon should definitely be coloured yellow instead of orange. -- Ratherous ( talk) 05:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Kwamikagami:, Hi I'm not sure if you saw my response, but I just saw that you changed Gabon to yellow anyway. Could you explain your reasoning for that? Do you have evidence that the new law was approved without the intention of being applied? -- Ratherous ( talk) 07:04, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ratherous. According to the latest refs in our article, the law hasn't been implemented yet. It would be CRYSTAL to assume it will be. (Though of course by now it very likely has been, if we can find a ref.) Also, we use yellow for countries that haven't imprisoned anyone in the past 3 years. That convention was based on existing laws, of course, not new ones, but has anyone even been charged yet? We could also leave the country grey until we have a RS that the law is actually in force. It's just a bit weird to color Gabon for imprisoning people when it hasn't happened and we don't even know that it would be legal to do so. — kwami ( talk) 07:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- @ Kwamikagami:, I think colouring it grey should definitely be out of the question as the law is already on the books, and after looking around I found this source saying two men have already been arrested [1]. Let me know what you think. -- Ratherous ( talk) 07:57, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
the criminal law against same-sexual activity is still enforced in Myanmar according to this article and this homosexuality map should reflect it. One enforcement of the law cited is from 2018. I'm also notifying User:Kwamikagami, User:Kaleetan and User:Fenetrejones by simple mentioning.
I also wonder whether the criminal law of Ethiopia against homosexuality is no longer enforced even though it was removed in March 2019 from the list of pardonable offenses, which points towards the opposite as I think. In this Medium article from 2020, the Ethiopian author states that the threat of imprisonment, which means the application of the law, still goes on or can be perceived. In another report from 2015, it said however that the law was generally not enforced.
Please review whether Antarctica can be removed from the map because it is not needed in any way.
Please reassess whether it is always found out correctly that there were no prosecutions. Some countries or regions of countries issue prosecution reports with the numbers of reports and likely subsequent prosecutions. Only for the reason that a prosecution has not become public, it does not mean at all that there had not been any prosecutions. I am currently not sure about editing SVG files and the topic can at times be in some ways difficult to deal with, considering such laws. HeliosX ( talk) 02:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- In yellow countries, people may live in fear of arrest or imprisonment -- the fact that a law hasn't been enforced for a while doesn't mean it can't be enforced tomorrow, and the police may use that fear to extort money from people. But orange means actual prison. I added stripes for cases where people are being arrested but not prosecuted. In the case of Burma, his employee changed him with assault. That's a different issue, even if the law involved is the same. We can't include every nuance of the law on a simple map. If people are not being arrested, prosecuted or imprisoned for consensual sex, then IMO the country should remain yellow.
- If you have any evidence for enforcement in Ethiopia, please let us know. — kwami ( talk) 04:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Until enough signatures are turned in to force a referendum, marriage equality is scheduled to occur on a specific day, which counts as being listed with an asterisk. If the referendum is guaranteed, then it should be removed from the template. Naraht ( talk) 11:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- It actually can't be confirmed because the legislation allows a period of 100 days where it becomes a question of whether or not the next step will be applicable, menaing the legislation process has not yet ended. The template shouldn't rush into predicting the turnout of the process per
WP:CRYSTAL. --
Ratherous (
talk) 23:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- Also I was just curious what was the specific date? I just personally haven't seen any articles confirming a date. -- Ratherous ( talk) 23:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ITN recognition for Vladimir Zhirinovsky
On 9 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Vladimir Zhirinovsky, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 16:59, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)