|
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/November 2008#Jw_193. SoxBot X ( talk) 00:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
You're very quick to delete. I thought that the world's first & only robotic Gamelan was worthy of having a wiki as this is the FIRST & ONLY instrument, or robot like it. I wrote a small piece on it & an being plagued with questions. Normally I push them toward the wiki, in this case you think it's not even worthy enough to have a wiki? Engineers, musicians, and fans of technology would find this of interest. If certain deep fried foods are worthy, I was sure that this would be. I had only just begun work on it & you deleted it 2 minutes after the first save. What a shame. Please take the time to research Mechanical Instruments & let me know how you distinguish which ones are worthy of keeping on wiki. -- Prettydigital ( talk) 18:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear that your Gamelatron article was deleted. I believe you meant to contact NawlinWiki ( talk). I did not see your article and certainly did not delete it.-- Jw 193 ( talk) 02:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Notability of Bartholomew Allerton
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Bartholomew Allerton, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Bartholomew Allerton seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Bartholomew Allerton, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk) 14:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bartholomew Allerton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bartholomew Allerton. Thank you. TM 19:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
BACKLOG OF THE WEEK Category:Pages with broken reference names
Hello - some editors fight off the vandal hordes, as I do repairing pages with citation errors. If I didn't - there would be a large backlog in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting and in Category:Pages with missing references list as in Category:Pages with broken reference names ( more than 1500 yesterday). But it is impossible to work it alone. Do you know how to do a " Blitz" (excuse the comparision) to find willing editors to work on it. It is much more easier to repair references if you do it one hour, one day or one week ago after the errors were made instead of months and years after the error was done. Very, very difficult to find these errors.
Only with WikiBlame Search it is possible to find and repair such errors.
Best wishes & thanks -- Frze > talk 09:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Backlog template made by User:TheJJJunk
| Category | Current status |
|---|---|
 Not done
| |
 Done
| |
| Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character ",". |
Best wishes -- Frze > talk 04:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
There is a suggestion on Wikipedia:Bot requests for a new REFBot working as DPL bot and BracketBot do. I beg politely for consideration. Please leave a comment if you wish. Thanks a lot in anticipation. -- Frze ( talk · contribs) 04:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Jw 193. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I have added my comments in the only talk I saw of this terminology at Talk:2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak#Casualties Table. I saw discussion about why the use of "Mainland China" was used there. The terminology is simple and should be followed by the same list that List of sovereign nations follows. There is no controversy there and the manual of style around the terminology of countries and dependencies there should be the standard. Krazytea( talk) 01:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
|
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/November 2008#Jw_193. SoxBot X ( talk) 00:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
You're very quick to delete. I thought that the world's first & only robotic Gamelan was worthy of having a wiki as this is the FIRST & ONLY instrument, or robot like it. I wrote a small piece on it & an being plagued with questions. Normally I push them toward the wiki, in this case you think it's not even worthy enough to have a wiki? Engineers, musicians, and fans of technology would find this of interest. If certain deep fried foods are worthy, I was sure that this would be. I had only just begun work on it & you deleted it 2 minutes after the first save. What a shame. Please take the time to research Mechanical Instruments & let me know how you distinguish which ones are worthy of keeping on wiki. -- Prettydigital ( talk) 18:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry to hear that your Gamelatron article was deleted. I believe you meant to contact NawlinWiki ( talk). I did not see your article and certainly did not delete it.-- Jw 193 ( talk) 02:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Notability of Bartholomew Allerton
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Bartholomew Allerton, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Bartholomew Allerton seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Bartholomew Allerton, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk) 14:50, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bartholomew Allerton, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bartholomew Allerton. Thank you. TM 19:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
BACKLOG OF THE WEEK Category:Pages with broken reference names
Hello - some editors fight off the vandal hordes, as I do repairing pages with citation errors. If I didn't - there would be a large backlog in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting and in Category:Pages with missing references list as in Category:Pages with broken reference names ( more than 1500 yesterday). But it is impossible to work it alone. Do you know how to do a " Blitz" (excuse the comparision) to find willing editors to work on it. It is much more easier to repair references if you do it one hour, one day or one week ago after the errors were made instead of months and years after the error was done. Very, very difficult to find these errors.
Only with WikiBlame Search it is possible to find and repair such errors.
Best wishes & thanks -- Frze > talk 09:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Backlog template made by User:TheJJJunk
| Category | Current status |
|---|---|
| Not done
| |
| Done
| |
| Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character ",". |
Best wishes -- Frze > talk 04:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
There is a suggestion on Wikipedia:Bot requests for a new REFBot working as DPL bot and BracketBot do. I beg politely for consideration. Please leave a comment if you wish. Thanks a lot in anticipation. -- Frze ( talk · contribs) 04:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
|
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Jw 193. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I have added my comments in the only talk I saw of this terminology at Talk:2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak#Casualties Table. I saw discussion about why the use of "Mainland China" was used there. The terminology is simple and should be followed by the same list that List of sovereign nations follows. There is no controversy there and the manual of style around the terminology of countries and dependencies there should be the standard. Krazytea( talk) 01:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |