This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

→

Archive 25

---

This seems to be a bunch of vandalizing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Big_bad_noose

Sorry to bother you. Bus stop ( talk) 11:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Please disregard -- it has been taken care of. Sorry to bother you. Bus stop ( talk) 12:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

I'd like to file a lawsuit about wikipedia not allowing free speech. Can you please help me to do this? I have noticed, since edits are being reverteed, this is impeding my right to free speech. Can you please give me some insight into this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.31.44 ( talk) 15:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Then What rights do I have??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.31.44 ( talk) 15:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

You sent me a message I was vandalising, but I am right. What I put there is true. The guy, Lauri Dalla Valle has not played football for the senior team, and for players like Buchtmann and Frimpong this was reason to delete their pages. Why not his? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.61.62.157 ( talk) 21:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey... you noticed that a lot of them schoolkids are creating problem using IPs from WSPIC? This is getting out of hand, something needs to be done soon. -- Dave1185 ( talk) 21:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Their (vandals) anger makes me laugh :) Maxis ftw ( talk) 23:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Not sure exactly what you are referring to, but you're welcome. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou for fixing my mistyping of the date of the Dissolution-period trial at Vale Royal Abbey. Don't know how I missed that. Best wishes, Soph ( talk) 01:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. Looking at this user's contributions, they don't seem to be blatant vandalism. Are you sure it warrants those strong warnings on their talk page? — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 11:39, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Are you kidding me?

A bun can be long and skinny, and a bun can be small and round or big and round, it depends how you make the bun. BUNFUZZ is a character I have in my childrens books. That was my reference, thanks for runing my students day. I hope you feel like a hero. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.75.68.254 ( talk) 13:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

hey there .. I got a message from you regarding that I was vandalizing an article namely checkmate marathi film.But the information I put there is true and not of a vandalizing nature.I ve added the producer name in the empty field.producer is kanchan satpute..article... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanchan_Satpute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enteritems123 ( talk • contribs) 18:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello. Your two week hard block of 72.95.217.34 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) has me rather ... surprised. Unless I missed something, I only show the IP as having received one warning in the past 50 days, with their previous block being in 2008. Perhaps you would consider making this a soft block a la {{ schoolblock}} or something similar? Thank you for your time, — Kralizec! ( talk) 19:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't remember why I did that, so I changed the block. Cheers. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:12, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't want to sound annoying, but we are supposed to give reasons for blocks, aren't we? [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], ... —  Aitias //  discussion 18:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

That is that "joker" idiot, but whatever. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but even in this case it's much more transparent and convenient for others to provide a reason. :) Best wishes, —  Aitias //  discussion 00:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Wow, you are incredibly fast. I went to tag this page for deletion and next thing I know, it's gone. :) t'shael ^mindmeld 01:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm watching an IRC channel, so I see it in pretty much real time. The really funny thing is, someone actually did get a CSD tag in there. I seriously couldn't believe that they were that fast. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

J.delanoy operates at a faster speed than most bots. Some doubt he is human. Meetare Shappy ^Cunkelfratz! 01:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

haha, I'm beginning to myself. ;) Who got the tag in there, if you don't mind my asking? t'shael ^mindmeld 01:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

User:PranksterTurtle tagged it. Oh, and Shappy: {{ fact}}... J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm sufficiently impressed. t'shael ^mindmeld 01:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

My name is Rudolfo Garcia. I am the founder and owner of the business named Graffiti Blasters® based in Chicago IL. This business was trademarked in 1985, in the State of Illinois. Graffiti Blasters® was granted Federal Trademark staus on June 11, 2002. The Federal Trademark number is Reg.No.2,578,343 this can be verified with the U.S.Patent and Trademark Office. Your posting of information about Graffiti Blasters ® on your site does not have the registered trademark symbol ® precededing the name Graffiti Blasters® . This is a notification to others who may try to use the name with out the consent of the owner. It is very important that the trademark be respected. Otherwise, it can cause infringement by others, lawsuits, legal fees etc. That is why the symbol is supposed to be displayed in accordance to the copyright and trademark rules. I have tried to edit and correct this error on the wiki page titled Graffiti Blasters you will see that the Federal Trademark is missing. I would greatly appreciate if you can get this error corrected. It will ward potential infringement and alert others the name Graffiti Blasters® is protected under the LAW.If, you would like visit my website www.graffitiblasters.net and it will help verify my claim.I have tried to edit information in the summary but, it only gets deleted. I do not want this to become a LEGAL issue since attorneys love this type of thing . It only means MONEY for them, and expenses for you and I. Can you help with this issue / Thanks Rudolfo Garcia , Pres. Graffiti Blasters® Chicago IL. 773)927-6500 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.3.150.129 ( talk) 16:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

You clearly misunderstand the rights that you hold under trademark law. Your rights are as follows:

(1) Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which—

(A) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person, or

(B) in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person’s goods, services, or commercial activities,

shall be liable in a civil action by any person who believes that he or she is or is likely to be damaged by such act.

From Title 15 Chapter 22 Subchapter III § 1125 of the U.S. Code.

You cannot trademark a word in the abstract form. You can trademark specific representations of words, such as Microsoft's logo, but a word in and of itself is merely a concrete representation of an abstract idea. No one can legally use Microsoft's logo without explicit approval from Microsoft, but merely writing or saying the word "Microsoft" when referring to the company is not covered by trademark law, nor does it require notice that the word is trademarked. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey, just noticed your title for you userboxes on you userpage says "Userboxen". Is that intentional or not? -- Airplaneman ( talk) 21:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it is intentional. But thanks for asking. I often seem to be the king of tyops ;-) J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

[6] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Earlypsychosis ( talk • contribs) 23:39, June 5, 2009

Don't know. I'd say just leave it. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Regarding this edit. You should know it's fine for any editor to remove messages from their talk page. - Porchcrop ^{( talk| contributions)} 01:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

At the time I made that edit, I was considering whether to block him, so as I usually do before leaving a block notice, I reverted his last edits so that the warnings would be visible. I then had to do something away from my computer, and when I got back 90 minutes later, he had already been blocked. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:43, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, okay. :) - Porchcrop ^{( talk| contributions)} 07:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which succeeded with 56 in support, 12 in opposition and 3 neutral votes. I am truly honored by the trust that the community has placed in me. Whether you supported me, opposed me, or if you only posted questions or commented om my RfA, I thank you for your input and I will be looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas :). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). All the Best, Mifter ( talk)

Mifter ( talk) 23:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		You've kept the vandals squatting at the fence. They drink their spit and are thirsty to vandalize. Their skin is dry because their flesh can't be soaked from doing Wikisinful things. Thank you. How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 01:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

um.. Thanks... J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:45, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

lol. That's the most original reason for a barnstar that I've ever seen. - t'shael ^mindmeld 01:46, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello and thanks for blocking User talk:32.172.120.128. You might also want to watch for User talk:32.173.192.204 who did almost identical vandalism at the same time. Thanks again. Loves Macs (talk) 14:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello, this same person is continuing to express their political views on my talk page and other pages, from different IP addresses. Observe: 1, 2. Could you please block those addresses too? You can semi-protect my page if you want. Thank you. Loves Macs (talk) 23:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello again, I suspect the same person is back at it. I've opened a sockpuppetry case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/166.191.71.105. Could you please block that IP too? I don't know if you wanted this message under the same heading or a new one. Thank you. Loves Macs (talk) 17:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Damnstraightm35a2. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

It was unnecessary to call me stupid. It was obviously a joke about notability, hence the :-) following the comment. Rosencomet ( talk) 03:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

... Um, I was calling WP:BLP1E stupid, not you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Please note that you did not have my specific reply. Please review the notice board. 96.27.38.63 ( talk) 23:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied there. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

The Sparky Barnstar For reverting vandalism at such a quick rate, that even TWINKLE can't keep up with you (are you sure you aren't a robot?)...I present to you the Sparky Barnstar. Congrats! - NeutralHomer • Talk • 03:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, the last time I checked, I was human. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey, J.delanoy, thanks for reverting that nonsense on my talk page. :) - t'shael ^mindmeld 04:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Just so you know, you don't have to thank me every time if you don't want to... J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:12, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I like acknowledging people when they do nice things for me. :) Though, if you'd rather I not thank you every time, then I won't. t'shael ^mindmeld 04:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

It's not a problem, I just didn't want you to feel like you had to say thank you every time. Cheers! J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I need to know who to type in different language on Wikipedia such a Japanese.-- 0Neosis ( talk) 19:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Many thanks indeed for your prompt reversal of the vandalism from IP: 69.128.152.185 on my user page. S/he appears to be a persistent vandal - I checked earlier edits made from that address after s/he had vandalised the Dan McLeod page and found that they all seemed to be a acts of vandalism. I don't know how you picked up this one so quickly, but I am very grateful. Do you have any suggestions about how we might be able to block this person - or, at least, their IP address?

Cheers and all best wishes, John Hill ( talk) 04:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

This is fantastic. :) - t'shael ^mindmeld 05:32, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi, yeah I saw him/her (funny how we always presume that vandals are males.... wonder if that's significant ;D) some other time, but this time I wasn't sure if I should build it up, or report straight away (after all, s/he isn't quite as famous as some of our other regulars... yet). But in future I'll just report :) - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 16:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Heh, you know, I wasn't sure what that was until I saw Kingpin's talk on that subject... Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 19:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

go here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kamen_Rider_Agito_(character) you find the source of the edit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.40.82.177 ( talk) 16:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Greetings, I am trying to obtain a copy of a deleted article. What information do you need? The entry was called Calysto Communications (to the best of my knowledge). If there is anything you need to fulfill this request, I am your willing servant. Thank you. PS - I made this request of another administrator, but his talk page suggested that he may not be active at this time. Then I thought to make it of you since you're online about twenty-seven hours a day, but my incomplete memory led me to J.Milburn instead, and I wonder if he's even an admin! Then I remembered who you really are . . . do you forgive me? -- otherl left ^{No, really, other way . . .} 19:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Is Pwnfag an acceptable username? See [7]-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 20:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

You warned VeraDushi ( talk · contribs) for disruptive editing a couple of days ago. Unfortunately s/he has been at it again - check the contribs. -- ChrisO ( talk) 20:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Blocked. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Please explain this. Without any talkpage discussion you have deleted vast amounts of verifiable material. Why do you dispute tha Mehersele was the eldest of 3 children? Paid To Terms ( talk) 23:22, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't even remember making that edit. It's possible that I accidentally pressed the wrong key in Huggle. Sorry. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Please revert yourself in the article or make a note of what you did on the article talkpage, thanks. Paid To Terms ( talk) 23:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Mapleowns23 is the same as Bambooowns24. Please stop similar names from being made. Thanks Andrewrp ^Tally-ho! 14:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

I edited the camp victory page that you reverted. the Colbert Report has taped a series of USO supported shows at CV. Is the MWR edit not the appropriate place for mentioning it. Or perhaps more information should have been included to give context for the edit. How would you suggest this event be documented? Cordially, Ebesch1 Ebesch1 ( talk) 21:11, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Colbert makes comments about practically everything. Not everything he does is notable. Perhaps you could create a project on Wikia to chronicle Colbert's antics. Or maybe there already is, I don't know. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the unblock. I thought "free" was as in free to edit, but now I see that I was wrong. There's better ways to get articles kept. Maybe I should improve them? lol. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.165.153.245 ( talk) 21:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpages earlier today. I'll say that the vandalized version gave me a laugh. ;) -- Patar knight - ^chat/ _{contributions} 01:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Looks like the same vandal you blocked for three days earlier this month. Enigma ^msg 02:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

this is one of the funniest things I have seen on Wikipedia for a while now.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 02:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I've been working on an article in my namespace for a while now, and I wanted to know if you could give me some input, and possibly tell me how much more work, if any, I would need to do before I could make it public. My mother was one of the members of this group, and I have a bunch of great photos, but they are all from the 40's and 50's and I could never tell you who the photographers were. Is there any chance I can post any of these photos? Anyway, here is my article. Thanks! -- Hatman1960 ( talk) 05:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, the first thing you should do is add some citations to back up what you are saying, and to prove that the group is notable. Beyond that, I don't do a lot of writing, so I'm probably not the best person to ask. You might try asking User:Wizardman. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 14:50, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi! You reverted an addition of mine to the article about superstition. I'd very much like to know why. Thanks /Carl —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbswe ( talk • contribs) 05:57, June 11, 2009

Edit: I just read that the addition was considered "unconstructive". I find this very subjective and unjustified since the addition are at least as interesting as the others in the list and definitely differs from the others. The addition is also one of the most annoying superstitions there is so I think it deserves a place on the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.227.136.241 ( talk) 13:57, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

That was a couple of daysago, so I don't know. You could probably add it back if you want. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 14:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for being quick on the draw to restore the AfD tag at Vampires in new york (book). Since there've been issues with the original editor deleting the tags, I didn't want him to get blamed for your inadvertent deletion of the wrong tag. Otherwise, I'd have left it for you to fix yourself.

And if you're like me, you probably just selected the wrong tag. I can't speak for you, but I know I have an edit or two like that a day. The worst is templates; if I had a dollar for everytime I typed {{foo}] or the like and hit save instead of preview... :) — C.Fred ( talk) 16:59, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

No worries. A user added a {{ hangon}}, so I tried to manually revert with Huggle, but it apparently went crazy, and I didn't immediately notice. Then I edit-conflicted you trying to fix it by hand from Firefox. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

I believe it is your move.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 19:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

meh. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

:/— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 19:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello J. - would it be possible to get a short term block for IP User:87.112.78.98? In his very short time here he has vandalised an article which you reverted and warned him for here, then bandied some legal threats about, then blanked my user page and called me a Nazi. Is it Friday yet? -- ponyo ( talk) 20:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

No worries, Garion96 has now blocked the IP. Cheers, -- ponyo ( talk) 20:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the page protection and the eyes on my user/talk pages :) ponyo ( talk) 20:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

J Delanoy I am not sure but it appears that there were deletions I made to the molecule ethylene glycol dimethacrylate? I added the uniform code to find this molecule (CAS 97-90-5) and also the original reference Beilstein 2, IV, p1523. Additionally I added the formula weight 198.22 This type of reference categories is standard in international Organic polymer chemistry. For students using Wikipedia it would be important. There is no subterfuge that I am aware of Also I added the accepted abbreviation of EGDMA which is the accepted name for the ethylene glycol substituted version. Thus when a student types in EGDMA he is quickly linked to the parent copmpound where the CAS number is geven. When I typed in EGDMA wiki had no match? Thus I thought I was adding information for completeness. I do not do this regularly so I did not open an account. I am a Chemist (MD,PhD) working in polymer biotecnology. What I added was routine but cetainly would make the site much more of a resource. If this is not really acceptable then I understand. Sincerely RHK.

Sorry, that was a mistake. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Any particular reason for reverting these edits by 139.48.25.60? They don't look particularly unkosher to me. (Just wondering.) -- RegentsPark ( My narrowboat) 20:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey J.delanoy! I planned to have a conversation with you. It will be considered a planned conversation because the conversation has been planned by me....PLANNED CONVERSATION! in this conversation we will talk about things that I planned for us to talk about in this planned conversation. This has been planned! So, let's have a conversation.-- Planned Conversation ( talk) 01:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

... J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Wow. This is epic. Kind of reminds me of Very serious editor- t'shael ^mindmeld 14:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey man. Do you mind if I reblock (or if you would) this user for a lot longer? Check back on the contribs... static IP, no productive edits at all, going back six months or longer. Entirely vandalism. Tan | 39 14:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Go ahead. I just started using a new script to block people, and I'm still getting the hang of it. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 14:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Andrewrp ^Tally-ho! 15:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

No problem :-) J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

I have noticed you are blocking vandals really quickly. How are you doing this? Within 5 seconds of reporting a user, he is blocked. I like it. Andrewrp ^Tally-ho! 15:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Heh. I'm using nav-popups and Animum's easy-block.js script. Apparently, combining scripts like that = extreme speed. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:13, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

I also hang out in an IRC channel that has a bot that reports whenever any edit is made to AIV. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Cool, good to know if I ever become an admin. Andrewrp ^Tally-ho! 16:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

		WikiMedal for Janitorial Services
		You've shown up on my watchlist too much. Here's a little warning. :) Abce2| Access Denied 18:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page!-- Abce2| Access Denied 22:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

yw. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

-- Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 20:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

-- Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 20:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Nom nom nom nom! Enjoy your cake for your very special birthday! Irunongames • play 20:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

How is it vandalism you admin clearly say I am vandalizing the article when it is who I gave it most of the information then ever, before were a few sentences and look at it now, it looks like a great article and you guys call that vandalism, I did what i had to do because you guys keep on saying that it resembles a fan site! I worked hard on the article, how does it make it a fan site?! Then you know what you should also put that for Selena's article too because it has the same type of media, music samples and pictures as Yukiko Okada's page does. 6:15 pm, 13 June 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by YukikoTV ( talk • contribs) 22:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello J.delanoy - I've noticed that about a couple of days ago you blocked this user as a sock. Do you know who he/she is a sock of? If this account is a sock it should be tagged with a {{ sockpuppet}} template. I've noticed that it made only two edits: one to Schweinchen Fick's talk page, and one to yours. So, I'm currently thinking it's a Schweinchen Fick sock, but I'd like to know who you think it is so I can tag it accurately. I found Schweinchen Fick because he was vandalizing JamesBurns' talk page (which I had recently turned into a redirect to his user page as JamesBurns is banned). That's also how I found Vördschin killa, when I saw Schweinchen Fick's talk page. By the way, keep up the good work: I've noticed your edits and I must say I'm impressed with how easily you deal with vandals (like as if your ten times better than ClueBot).-- Disturbed Nerd999 (Delete!) 23:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliments :-) You are correct that it's a SF sock. (I don't like saying it because it means something... unpleasant in another language) I don't tag socks, but you are free to go ahead if you want. Cheers. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

just wondering why my edits to the arc page are being removed. arc is a term in the dirt bike world for flipping a dirt bike... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quackyquack34 ( talk • contribs) 00:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't remember, sorry. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:28, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on the Ernest Emerson page yesterday. Looks like the vandal is back under another IP: User talk:65.25.138.239-- Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 04:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Is there a way to prevent creation of inappropriate user names? Specifically, anything with "on wheels" (or any variant thereof) in it? Thanks, - T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 07:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Not easily, and there is really no point, since he will just use different combinations that look like "wheels". J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

What if I sit down and figure out every combination of "on wheels" that there is? Or is that just a huge waste of my time? - T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 15:15, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Not just a waste of time, that is completely impossible. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

There has to be a finite amount of ways to make something look like "on wheels". Ah well, I don't have that much time anyway. Thanks, though. - T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 15:19, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Why'd you revert my edit? They get trapped inside Onyx just prior to Halo 2.. infact, i'm sure they get trapped during the events of Halo 2.. because Halsey piggybacks a message cortana sends back to Earth... Turton7 ( talk) 15:13, 13 June 2009 (UTC) Infact, it's impossible for the events on Onyx to have taken place just prior or during Halo:CE, because Fred & Kelly were still on Reach at that time, and Linda was floating in Space in a Cryopod over Installation 04. Turton7 ( talk) 15:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't know, I may have made a mistake. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. I hope you don't mind I corrected your Greek. Regards! -- Egmontaz♤ ^talk 17:14, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello J.delanoy, I hate to bother you about this, but I wonder if you would consider closing the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bones and Biscuits per WP:SNOW, I would wait out the entire period, except that I'd quite like to nom the article for DYK. If you believe that WP:SNOW does not apply then I will happily wait out the period of time. Also, I would ask NawlinWiki, as they are the admin who nommed it, except that their contribs show them as being offline at the moment, and I won't be editing tomorrow so I'd quite like to get this done tonight, if that's OK with you, in any case, don't feel obliged to close it just because I asked, thank you, and all the best Spitfire ^Tally-ho! 19:01, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't usually close AfDs, and I don't like snow closing ones that are not extremely obvious, like 6 votes one way and none the other. You might try asking User:Juliancolton. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Nah, I'll leave it now, like I said, I don't want to go around asking every admin until I find one who will do it, your judgement that SNOW is a bit hasty at the moment is enough for me, thanks a lot anyway :) All the best Spitfire ^Tally-ho! 19:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, you can do what you want, but this is an area where I have almost no experience, so getting someone else's opinion would probably be good. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

[ [8]] Look at what this user has been doing!-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 22:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Someone else blocked, and I moved all the pages back. Thank you very, very much. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:07, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

My pleasure. I would do just about anything to stop vandalism. I tried to simply "undo" thier edits but when that did nothing I figured the best thing to do was contact an admin. And YOU were the first person I thought of.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 22:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

I realize you already blocked this user indef, but I just wish to inquire, what do you think his deal is? And do you think he'll be coming back?— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 07:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

You undid my edit because it was "unconstructive". How? He was an ex-pupil, like everyone else on that list. He was taken off by someone else before so I put him back on like he should be and then you took him off again because it's "unconstructive". And I did an "edit summary". Why remove him from the list and not everyone else? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.203.78 ( talk) 09:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Saying that someone is a terrorist without providing a citation to a reliable source is not a light thing to do. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 14:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

The line was "suspected terrorist" as is made clear on his page. And that isn't a reason to remove the line. I've put it back with the source it originally had. If this is still isn't "light", why not write it light-er than just take out factual information? Contributions/82.25.203.78 ( talk) 09:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

timestamp for bot J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

This is a continuation of above. I really hate to say this, but WP appears to be crawling with sockpuppets nowadays. According to behavioral and CheckUser evidence, HexaChord (who recently claimed that he/she was retired on his/her master account) was the sockmaster behind "SF" and Vördschin killa, as well as a whole lot of other socks that were used for WP:POINTy behavior (including Juvenille Deletionist and Deletion Mutation). I am very disappointed with this, but I just thought I should let you know. You may want to see this [9]. I am also quite shocked that HexaChord was a sockpuppeteer, kind of like how I felt when I found out about JamesBurns being a disruptive sockpuppeteer. I guess this means that you can't really know someone around here until it's too late. My trust for others around here is now quite small, but you're still one of the people that I trust plenty around here (being a great admin). Basically, what I'm saying is that this is just depressing how easily others whom I've trusted had to use socks to change my mind.
The bottom line is: Watch out for more HexaChord socks.-- Disturbed Nerd999 (Delete!) 17:17, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw that. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Congrats, you've been approved by the arbitration committee as one of the uninvolved admins to help settle Macedonia naming issues. The centralized discussion is at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Macedonia. The arbitration case final decision is at WP:ARBMAC2. See especially this remedy. Admins User:Fritzpoll and User:Shell Kinney form the triumvirate with you. Thank you for your assistance. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Constant personal attacks here [10] and [11]. An example: this guy supports terrorist organisations such as PKK, ASALA and other anti-Turkish groups that makes crimes against humanity. this gus also attacks pages about Turkish and Turkic civilization. You can close credit to this user. because he/she/it is aganist humanity. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

It looks like he's stopped for now, but I'll keep an eye on him. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 02:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

He's back at it. Just get rid of this troll. -- Folantin ( talk) 16:09, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Tanthalas39 blocked him for 55 hours. - T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 17:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. I appreciate it! Icseaturtles ★ 04:34, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

No problem. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry Delanoy but I would really appreciate a comment on the "discussion" between me and ChrisO, even if you deem that I am to blame. I am really fed up with this kingly attitude of his and I think that he is actively searching to intimidate editors (including me), with his "legalistic" arguments and highly unwikilike proposals. He (and others) throw accusations here and there (I really don't know whether this discussion about this "unnamed" editor was about me, Shadowmorph or somebody else), the mentioning of emails personally sent, as though there is some personal discussion going on between you and Taivo (I have confidence in you and the other referees, but I hope you understand that such comments raise questions), the urge for me to go away, the deletion of my "ranting" as though he still was an admin and many more such actions, which clearly do not help. If I would start a topic about "someone" who did this and that, but did not name him, if I acted in such an aggressive way would you and the other referees tolerate that? I know that my words sometimes sound ironic, but at least I am very careful with my words and I consistently try to not accuse people and whenever I think that we do not act towards Wikipedia's interest (as was the case here) I always place myself among those who should rethink and improve. Please, do take a position, even if you think I am wrong in this. GK1973 ( talk) 20:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

All right, I will look at it. For the record, I did not ask Taivo to email me, and if I do reply, I will not reply to him off-wiki. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

hey Kyrenia is not city in Republic of Cyprus( 78.135.15.190 ( talk) 21:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC))

okay first there are 3 more people

David German 27 Has three kids and is married to a women who is 9 years older than him —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.156.53.224 ( talk) 03:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

I thought you were trying to test something, I didn't realize you had made so many edits to the page, and I only intended to undo one of them. Sorry. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:55, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Exuse me good sir but poeple from missouri are often called "rednecks". I know becaus i live there please look on the internet and you will see. "Redneck" means a rural white republican and if you look at the demographics the you will surly see why i use the term redneck. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pattond2 ( talk • contribs) 04:26, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

LOL if you were going to speedy delete it, not much point in giving me the notice with a red link! It may have been a public domain image which was incorrectly licensed as fair use under Template:PD-Finland50 but judging by her wrinkles in it I'd say it was made in the last twenty or so years. At least we have a free replacement anyhew. Saludos. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 08:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Hehe don't worry, you were right to delete it, just not much I can do about a no longer breathing image! Regards and happy editing! Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 16:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

I know my block is over, but can I get some help from the admins. The block was totally abusive and I have been on the receiving end of some harassment by an editor. here and here Can you help me out, please? Thanks so much -- DoyleCB ( talk) 20:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

You should probably go to WP:AN. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

I am new to Wikipedia and need help fixing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computalk. Yes, this article is about me and my company, but I figured since no one else wrote about it in the 9 years since it ended, I better start it myself, including 3rd party links. I would really appreciate any help possible. You can also email me at tom@tomking.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomkinghouston ( talk • contribs) 02:43, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't really do a lot of writing. Sorry. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank You, Per: this edit. The sad thing is, donut burger with eggs was actually one her recipes! ISTHnR | Knock Knock | Who's There? 04:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Jack griesel Somehow I created the page when I was trying to replace a mistaken speedy tag I had placed on it. Abce2| Access Denied 14:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Looks like someone else already got it. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 14:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I was about to say that but I got in an edit conflict with you. Well, thanks anyways! Abce2| Access Denied 14:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

My understanding was that old or alternative names for something go at the beginning of the articles, so why when the article admits that "The PUMA acronym as originally coined stood for "Party Unity My Ass";" and this is what I think most people who followed the election but not *that* closely know it as; should it not be put in that alternate name spot? At the very least, why is this vandalism rather than an edit dispute? 208.66.212.230 ( talk) 15:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi J. - Any chance of getting a block here? A group of us keep reverting this BLP violating IP and a notice has been up at WP:AIV for about 15 minutes with no action. ponyo ( talk) 18:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Ahhh, sweet relief, thank you kindly! ponyo ( talk) 18:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

You may already know this, but Candyapple49 ( talk · contribs) is probably a sock of banned user Tweety21. Same edit patterns, so far anyway. Thanks. Ward3001 ( talk) 18:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye on them. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Tweety21 has been a prolific puppeteer, for a long time wreaking havoc on several pages, including user pages, articles, Afds, and sock reports about her. Now she pops in with different usernames/IPs about once a month or so until she's caught. Ward3001 ( talk) 18:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Heh, thanks for the link. I was looking around for something similar before you closed it. But I stopped once you'd closed it. I'll have a read. Cheers - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 18:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Just came here to say thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page and for staying on top of that sort of thing in general...

...but now I must complement you on the interactive chess game section on this page. Your idea? If so, how cool. Another wikicookie is in order. - SoSaysChappy ( talk) 20:07, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

It would be cooler if he would move (hint, hint). It's been his move for ages. :) T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 21:36, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia_talk:Centralized_discussion/Macedonia#Page_protected ASAP. — Rlevse • Talk • 14:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Looking... J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 14:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes..sorry...my mistake, though once was from Tyrell corporation, the real company..anyway..i think i reverted anything before you do this, when i understood my mistake. sorry again.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psikxas ( talk • contribs) 22:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Why my change was reverted as vandalism? I set forth my argument down as requested. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vamosr7 ( talk • contribs) 22:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Usually, the first title listed in the lede of an article is the title of the page, and any other names for the subject are listed afterwards. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Is there any way to stop that guy's censorship crusade seeing that he is apparently editing from several different IPs some of which are public? ·Maunus·ƛ· 23:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Shouldn't the article be reverted first to its previous version then protected...not protected with the disputed (against previous consensus) material still in it! -- Xevorim ( talk) 03:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't look at what is on the page when I protect it, I look at the page's history to see if edit-warring has occurred. See also m:The Wrong Version. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:13, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

I was patrolling pages and I came upon this page which is a copy and paste of Jerry Rice. I wasn't able to find a CSD for copy and paste so I was wondering what to do. Whispe ring 03:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

I saw that your pinged me on IRC. I wasn't home, but sorry I missed you. Feel free to send me an email. :) hmwith τ 05:39, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting my userpage, I keep getting attacked by people who's vandalism edits I've reverted... -- Randor Xeus. 18:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

I said it was bad form to remove comments, not a policy violation. Removing comments is generally discouraged. 173.66.36.76 ( talk) 19:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

The anon IP has reported me to the 3RR noticeboard. I do not feel any compunction to reply as I was reverting what I define as vandalism. If posting a reply would serve me better I will do so. What's your advice? Thanks Tide rolls 19:49, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't know. You did technically violate 3RR. I won't personally block you, but I cannot say what the result of this will be. All I will say now is, unless you are ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN that something is vandalism, do not revert the fourth time! If it really is vandalism, someone else will revert it. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:51, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

I technically violate 3RR three or four times a day. I know that my reversions are open to scrutiny and that does not intimidate me. I will, of course, accept the outcome whatever form it takes. Point taken about "absolutely certain"...I've heard that one before. Thanks for your time. Tide rolls 19:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

His story about vandalism reversion on Shirley Phelps-Roper checks out, and it's an alternate account of User:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back, who's a user in good standing. Any objection to my unblocking? Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 02:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I see you've gone ahead and done so; good on you. Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 02:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, I wasn't sure if he was an impersonator, but the accidental vandalism convinced me. Sorry. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I've requested clarification on SQRT5P1D2's topic ban here. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 03:24, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Would be fine, thanks. — Jake Wartenberg 16:25, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

 Done (Does that page even exist? I'm going to get yelled at :S Oh well...) J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:28, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

		The Admin's Barnstar
		Thanks a lot for your great work (and protecting my talkpage)! I truly appreciate it. Cheers, Catgut ( talk) 22:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thanks for the barnstar :-) J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I did comment my edit on List of Syriac people. But you reverted without commenting why. Shmayo ( talk) 22:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Unilaterally redirecting pages like that is not a good idea. You should leave a note on the talk page, and then wait and see if people disagree with you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:54, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm trying to restore my user page, I'd appreciate it if you don't revert my edits. My account was hijacked, things are ok now.( Jack1755 ( talk) 01:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC))

ok, sorry. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Heads up for you J. An IP has registered a complaint against you here. -- VS ^talk 07:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

It looks like this article, which you deleted, appears to have been a valid article - I assume it had been vandalised. snigbrook ( talk) 17:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

heh, oops. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, really is there, though you have to wonder why they called it that. Perhaps the Pike County commissioners could rename it...Any wonder that this attracts more vandalism (although still not much) than virtually any other Ohio township article? Nyttend ( talk) 03:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey J.delanoy, s'been a while.

I've recently been on a break here for the past month due to exams, and I recall earlier this month having User:Spis Ikke Gul Snø leave a message on my talk page regarding User:Future Perfect at Sunrise. I just read of the indefinite ban you've placed on him, and I can't comment on the justification of that, but I'd just like to point you to the thread he left on my talk page in case you can draw any conclusions from it. The thread can be found here. Cheers, hope you're well. Regards, --— Cyclonenim |  Chat  18:14, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw that, thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

J., you might want to check that ban again cause it isn't showing up on the block log. Also, he was previously in discussion with Acroterion here about User:Future Perfect at Sunrise. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 18:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

I think it's clear he's been on Fut. Perf's back for a while... -- ChrisO ( talk) 19:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

I didn't ban him from the site entirely, so blocking him to enforce the ban is unnecessary. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

I've suggested a way to reduce the amount of clutter that we're likely to have in the envisaged public RfC on Macedonia naming issues. Please see Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/Macedonia#Winnowing proposals - grateful for comments. -- ChrisO ( talk) 19:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Seen here.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 20:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't know, but my I suggest a longer block. User is oviusly up to no good and will most likely come after us next.(The unblock requests you rverted)

Wouldn't a longer block help deter them from vandalising. Abce2| Free Lemonade Only 25 cents! 03:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Could you please delete The Merry Thoughts‎ so that I may complete a page move? Would appreciate it. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 03:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to bug you again, but could you also delete the talk page for the same page? I didn't know I needed a G6 tag on it as well. My mistake. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your help :) Both moves have been made. Take Care... NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

No problem. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:13, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi, J.D. Could you please take a look at this? (sroll up for more history) We've got three admins (at least) saying "Salt and block", but no apparent followup. I had an e-mail conversation with DGG about it yesterday; he was hesitant to do the actual salt & block since he had issued an opinion. Said he'd ping another admin, but he seems to be out today. I'm not interested in hounding Psikxas to the ends of the earth (or the ends of Wikipedia), but I find the lack of action a little troubling. Thanks either way. — Scheinwerfermann ^T· _C04:31, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Really? That doesn't look like his MO.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 06:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, it's not. I misunderstood the CU I'm talking to. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 06:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Either way, Volume Control ( talk · contribs) is the same person.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 06:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Dear J.Delanoy, you said you would do something about the situation in Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/Macedonia. The demeaning and intimidating attitude of ChrisO is as alive as always. His arrogance and offensive attitude are clearly a matter where you as a ref should step in. Please do something or just plainly state that I am wrong and his attitude is civil and according to Wiki policy. Thx GK1973 ( talk) 11:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Just got on, checking over pages. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay, you're going to have to be more specific. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

[12], [13], [14], [15] (I am not really sure about that, maybe it would be more proper to have notified an admin first?), [16], [17], [18], [19].

So..are profiling, characterizing editors hardcore nationalists, removing edits one does not like, urging editors to leave the discussion (actually this situation is the sole reason why my involvement lessened, a great victory of his I suppose...), calling for bans etc the way we should debate here? GK1973 ( talk) 12:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Actually, J.Delanoy, I was actually going to write to you about this myself. I would like you to remove all references to my alleged nationality by users BalkanFever and ChrisO. That would be the entire thread of comments that was initiated by [20] and would definitely include [21], [22] and [23]. I am also asking that oversight be used to permanently delete the edits, as I consider my nationality to be a matter of personal privacy. Further to that, I am requesting that you address BalkanFever's and ChrisO's incivility ( [24], [25]). Editors who do not support their POV have been blocked or banned for much less; allowing them to insult people with impunity is beginning to give the impression of two weights and two measures in conduct policy enforcement. Finally, I am now formally accusing ChrisO of attempted outing, in light of his most recent posting of off-wiki stuff in an attempt to speculate on my real-life identity and ethnicity. Please advise as to what further steps should be taken. -- Radjenef ( talk) 16:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't think you understand how the oversight tool works. Oversighting those edits would be impossible. Well, not impossible, but it would require that every single edit made to that page after the one in question also be oversighted, which is simply not going to happen. Also, while I do not think anything was gained by saying what he did, ChrisO did not out you. Anyone looking at your editing patterns and comments would come to the conclusion that you are Greek, or at the very least, that you are very sympathetic to the Greek side of this issue.

If you still think that ChrisO's comments relating to that are an issue, you should probably talk to him. Which, incidentally, is what both of you should have done in the first place. Why is it that anyone in a dispute immediately comes running to me (or whoever has "power") instead of just talking to the individual that you have a problem with. I don't get why that concept is so difficult to grasp. If you cannot get a satisfactory conclusion after talking to him, post to WP:ANI.

As far as the diffs you and GK1973 gave, once again, talk to the people you have a problem with, and ask them to tone it down. After I finish my current project, I will make a post to the main discussion page about decorum.

And finally, with regard to Radjenef's implied accusation that I am playing with two standards here, ("Editors who do not support their POV have been blocked or banned for much less.") please give me ONE example where I have been impartial. As far as I know, there have been only two people blocked and/or banned as a result of their edits to the discussion pages. One was wiki-lawyering to evade a topic ban imposed on him by the Arbitration Committee. The other was a sockpuppet of someone Future Perfect at Sunrise apparently disagreed with in the past, and was only contributing in order to harass him. In any case, the sock's response to my ban notification clearly shows what his intentions were. Are you seriously suggesting that what ChrisO and BalkanFever have said is comparable to sockpuppetry and overt evasion of an ArbCom-imposed ban? J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't referring to you, J.delanoy, I apologise if it sounded that way. I was referring to the way things were handled prior to the commencement of the generalized discussion. It goes without saying that we are all thankful for all the time and effort you (and the other referees) have put into overseeing the discussion. -- Radjenef ( talk) 17:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

As far as speculations concerning my nationality go... I understand why someone might deduce, after checking my editing patterns, that I am sympathetic to the Greek side of this issue (even though my views are always backed up by a policy rationale). But to speculate on nationality is a different thing, especially when people allege to track my off-wiki actions. Looking at people's editing patterns I could easily deduce that Future Perfect, ChrisO, Taivo and many others are sympathetic to the Republic's side of this issue. That wouldn't give me the right to claim that they have some connection to the Republic. These people have been asking that Greeks be excluded from the discussion because of bias. Now, I guess, they're asking the same thing, not for Greeks, but for people they deduce to be Greek? This is the ugly slippery slope I was referring to during arbitration: "Anyone who disagrees with us must be Greek, so they should be excluded from the discussion". I guess I'll go post at ANI if worse comes to worse. -- Radjenef ( talk) 17:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

No one, I repeat, no one is going to be banned/blocked for anything other than their own actions. Full stop. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I have clearly stated to him on many occasions that I find his attitude demeaning and offensive. He never denied it, he just pushed on. What else should I do? Writing here was not my first attempt to oppose his "style" of writing. GK1973 ( talk) 07:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

please give us a break on the editing it was funny right? :) we wont vandalize any more although you might find others that we vandalized earlier. we are sorrey but there is nothing we can do about the ones we already vandalized from: the people who vandalized chubby cox,stay out of my life,mark wood, and the adventures of tom sawyer. :(

First off, vandalism is not funny. It damages the hard work of other editors, and is some cases it is defamatory. Second, the vandalism to the other articles you vandalized has been removed...

Contributing constructively is better than vandalism... It helps the encyclopedia, it obviously doesn't result in punishment, and you can do it all you want :) Until It Sleeps ^{Wake me} 19:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

BTW you forgot to fix 6sn7 your welcome your vandalizing friends:)

Hello, I noticed you reverted one of his edits so you must know this guy and I thought I should probably ask you, if it's OK. If you can, could you please protect his page. He's only using it for further abuse and his last edit is just so off the wall. Per these [ 1], [ 2], [ 3], [ 4], and [ 5]. If possible please protect it thanks. -- Brad Polard ( talk) 20:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I was just about to request page protection, when I saw you'd got to it. There's something going on, I'm not sure what, but I've started Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vza.kurrodu.  pablo _hablo. 21:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I was disappointed to see this article get deleted, thanks to some hokey made-up policies and pseudo-technical jargon. This is why we can't have nice things. NIRVANA2764 ( talk) 05:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

YES! That was very upsetting - I don't see why the article was deleted. Crabcore was even recently referenced in an article in The Guardian, a large UK newspaper. Why did you vandalize the page? 76.112.235.92 ( talk) 11:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

If you want to appeal the decision, Deletion review is down the hall and to the left. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

You have banned user Spis Ikke Gul Snø. Personally, I would ban anyone using the term f*** when addressing fellow users. As an administrator, I now ask of you to find out this user's IP address and, if possible, whose shockpuppet he/she is. Politis ( talk) 12:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Simply being an administrator is not enough to find out what someone's IP address is. You have to be a checkuser to be able to do that, and I am not. Sorry. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

J.delanoy is right... a checkuser is needed, and those are rather sparse around here, due to the nature of the userright. Also, it's sockpuppet, not shockpuppet :) UntilItSleeps ^{Public PC} 17:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Although a "shockpuppet" if it existed would be a terrifying creature. It would be like Chucky meets Raiden! :D Shadowmorph ^{^"^} 20:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

You are not allowed to remove ISP headers. Spamming all the arbitrators' talk pages is not going to do anything. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I am allowed to keep my page as I see fit. I want no page.
I am not spamming arbitrators. It is called discussion. Go to the dictionary & lookup the word. & honestly, your opinion of what Im doing matters not. If the page owners have a problem they'll let me know. 173.79.58.33 ( talk) 18:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

See WP:BLANKING. By the way, that is exactly what the arbs will tell you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:08, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I read that long ago. My favourite part is this : Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred... Repeatedly restoring warnings does nothing but antagonize users, and can encourage further disruption; removal of template warnings is rarely an urgent or important matter, and it is often best to simply let the matter rest if other disruption stops. 173.79.58.33 ( talk) 18:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments yes, ISP headers no. You know this, and yet you have done it multiple times over the last few months. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments, isp headers,newsletters,wikilove, & any other thing posted that I dont want. Why? Bc it is my page.
There is no need for my ISP to be shown. This is not a shared ip. If you all will run the checks you claim you will do you will see this.
And the archives show all info it isnt neccessary for it to be posted. 173.79.58.33 ( talk) 18:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

User:ChildofMidnight has started a thread, which I believe is nothing but him looking for an arguement with anyone and everyone. I boldly closed it and archived it (with the archive top and bottom templates) and was reverted by CoM. Would you mind taking a look at the thread and see if it needs to be closed. If any admin closes it, CoM is less likely to revert. If you wish not to get in the middle of this mess, I will completely understand. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 02:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I disagree with your decision to delete the article on Crabcore as it was somewhat informative and provided good examples. Its stub-like articles like these that help people learn about the new emerging trends in music and the media. I remember this same thing happened back with Hollywood Undead, mods deleted their page claiming that they were not a real band even though they had an EP out and stated one of the reasons why as being "joke band in a joke genre". I think it would be unwise to make a similar mistake, please reconsider un-deleting the crabcore article.

Regards, ~GrinningDemon.

I think that the consensus was clear when you take away all the canvassed users. If you want to appeal, we do have a Deletion review. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello,

Michael Jackson converted to Islam in November 20, 2008 and changed his name to "Mikhaeel Jackson" in a cerenomy in Los Angeles. Also, I gave 2 relevant source. Why does not this information to Michael Jackson page of Wiki ? Thanks.-- Cemsentin1 ( talk) 13:16, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

What the heck are you yelling at me for? J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 13:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi J.delanoy, here when you prepared the page for RfC you removed proposal C. I'm not sure whether this was intentional or not. Could you please clarify? Thanks, Balkan Fever 08:41, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, it was intentional. On the main page, I described why I chose the proposals that I did. Specifically in this case, no one who chose Proposal C said that it was their "first choice". J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 13:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Please have a look at my comment regarding the removal of option G for C. I really think that, given the circumstances, both proposals should stay. -- Radjenef ( talk) 14:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied there. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 14:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting User talk:SeamenDrewPickles . Look at what he left on my talkpage [26]the reply I left on his talk page;) [27] Happy Editing Schnitzel MannGreek. 15:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Might I suggest that you take a look at Odin5000's contributions list? This looks very much like a sleeper sockpuppet account, probably of one of the many editors blocked for disruption in this topic area, possibly one of those sanctioned by the ArbCom. A checkuser probably wouldn't be inappropriate (though I know you can't do that yourself, of course). -- ChrisO ( talk) 16:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I asked a CU, and they said that there is no evidence of socking, although they did agree that it is clearly an SPA. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the clarification. -- ChrisO ( talk) 17:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

You do know that he has reported you to AIV. I don't belive him, but you may want to straighten it out. Abce2| Free Lemonade Only 25 cents! 16:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw, thatnks. I believe that I have the authority to do what I did, but if he wants to pursue it, he is of course welcome to do so. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Abce2| Free Lemonade Only 25 cents! 16:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

He's now started an AN/I discussion - WP:AN/I#Ban J.delanoy for Vote Rigging. -- ChrisO ( talk) 17:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Since you are involved in the discussion concerning the removal of Proposal G, I am informing you of the request for clarification I have put forth [28]. I am only doing this because I believe that the greater community should have a chance of seeing and evaluating the proposal by itself. I highly regard all of the effort that you have put in this discussion, so far, and wish to thank you for it. -- Radjenef ( talk) 17:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey J.delanoy. :) Just if that was not clear, my question was not at all intended to question your actions; I was just curious. Best wishes, —  Aitias //  discussion 18:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

That's perfectly fine. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

You've been sent one. Thanks. Acalamari 19:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Responded. I won't bug you here anymore with further replies. Thanks. Acalamari 19:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps time for unprotection? What are your thoughts? Enigma ^msg 19:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Done. I had assumed that he would unprotect it himself, but I guess he didn't notice. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:25, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the vandal revert on my user page (userpage?). - Eugene Krabs ( talk) 21:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Just a note to say I'm suspicious that the IP you blocked earlier is possibly an IP sock of User:ColScott, of whom I ran afoul because of repeated sock activities. I'm mostly basing that on what is essentially stalking of my contributions to revert and add the reference to my vision problem (which is misrepresented in the edit summary). I can't quite confirm the sock or I'd make another new report, but I did want to apprise you of this. Thanks. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 21:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you, but you're the first name I recognised on the OTRS lists and I'm unfamiliar with The Ways Of OTRS.

There's a book cover: File:LeapIntoLegend.JPG. It's in use on the artist's page, has been used on the author's page (then removed, the image deleted, now the article AfDed) and would be useful on the article for the book subject Bluebird K7, as there's seemingly nothing else available that isn't copyrighted. The image page seems to claim both OTRS permission by the artist for the artist's page (alone?) whilst retaining copyright, yet it's also tagged (correctly?) as being GFDL and CC-by-sa.

This puzzles me. If it's CC-by-sa, then it's free for use on any article, can't be restricted to one article, and why would there need to be an OTRS ticket at all? Is it really licensed under CC-by-sa?

Can you please either clarify this, or point to where I ought to be looking. Thanks. Andy Dingley ( talk) 22:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi again! Would you say that User:Grnch would be classified as a Macedonia-focused WP:SPA since all of his other edits were minor edits done two years ago [29]? If yes, then would the WP:SPA accounts do not get to !vote ruling apply to him too? -- Radjenef ( talk) 00:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Also, could we request for a Checkuser? This user's knowledge of wikipedia policies seems strange given their list of contributions. -- Radjenef ( talk) 01:54, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I am not an active editor, but still a regular reader and user of Wikipedia for several years, so it is natural that I have become familiar with WP policies and other WP lore over the years. Checkuser will reveal that I am logging on from my home cable connection which has a semi-static IP address that hasn't changed since last year.

I am disengaging that user for now as the situation seems hopeless. He has been reverting all my edits and responds to my talk page comments with personal attacks. For the love of God please enforce 1RR: [30], [31], [32]. Note that the last revert used a personal attack as a response to my policy rationale. -- Radjenef ( talk) 02:29, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Radjenef is making unilateral edits to proposal text without discussing them first ( [33] [34] [35]), even though we already entered the RfC phase. I reverted them with explanatory comments ( [36] [37] [38]). Could you please take a look at this and clarify whether such unilateral edits are allowed at this point?

It was not clear to me what is the status of proposals at this point. If reverting was the wrong thing to do, I apologize and I will accept any sanctions you deem appropriate. -- Grnch ( talk) 02:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I've posted an article yesterday about Paul Roche The man died in 2007 and was a very important Poet and writer, translated classic Greek tragedies that had never been before. Not to mention that he was part of one of the most important art group in England in the 20th century. He's a published author and still after his death has lot of followers and fans. Yesterday I tried to replace an article and it is just unfair that it was deleted. Paul Roche (the writer poet) is mentioned as a reference in several articles on Wikipedia but the results of that research is Paul Roche, young sportsman from Ireland with a text as small as his success and importance in the world.

This isn't great and makes the content on several articles irrelevant( Like the one about Duncan Grant). Also it is morally important to bring up the most important information first in an encyclopedia. If my cat was called Barrack Obama and had killed 50 mice I wonder if it would be great to have "Barrack hussein Obama president of the United States of America since 2009" as research keywords because my puss would be taking the space. Well it's a about the same thing Between Paul Roche, an amazing Poet, an acclaimed published writer who wrote a movie script "Oedipus the King" where Orson Welles played and an unknown young man from deep deep Ireland who won a few competition at an obscure sport in his local villages. I don't think the one that comes up first should be the sportsman. Also the content of his article is very poor like his career that still really hasn't taken off. I think Wikipedia should be culture orientated and not become a blogging platform for anyone who fancy's himself as part of an encyclopedia. Even if I might post this article in several blogs :)

Also, as an answer to your comment I wanted to say that the author of this article gave me full rights to publish her text. She actually wrote it for the telegraph not the opposite. She's a writer herself. There's no right violation and I can prove it.

My questions are. How do I make sure that this article won't be deleted after 5 minutes again and could we ask the sportsman to add "Paul Roche Hurling player" ? since his tiny career in hurling is not very important compared to the other Paul Roche's achievements over 91 years and that the nice article I'm trying to post might be important for lot of students in literature and classics. Also everytime someone will mention the important Paul Roche (people are unlikely to write in an article Paul Donald Roche (poet)) on Wikipedia he will find that unimportant person instead. It will be a bad thing for culture I think. I won't let go about this one, it just doesn't make any sense.

We know how to use range blocks but there is no problem at all. We apreciate a lot your help against vandalism in greek wikipedia.-- MARKELLOS ^{Leave me a message}

Apparently there was more than one contributor to this page (so G7 doesn't apply), and Scorpion0422 ( talk · contribs) requests that it be restored. Could you look into this? Thanks. – Juliancolton |  ^Talk 03:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. I was deleted as part of a deletion discussion in the past, so I don't know. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

It was deleted as the result of an afd, but since then the person has received several more directing credits and was nominated for an Emmy Award (it should be noted that I was the user that originally nominated it for deletion). -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 16:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

You just restored that article. Did _you_ read and understand it ? Could you explain why a text on the glassy state starts with a long section about the viscosity of simple liquids ? Could you tell me what the fifty-odd unsorted references are good for ? -- Paula Pilcher ( talk) 16:28, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

If you're still around I've come across this negative, unsourced BLP that is just begging for deletion. :) - T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 05:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah, please disregard. DMacks zapped it right after I posted this. Thanks anyway, though. - T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 05:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi J.delanoy,

Could you help me to find out why an image I like to embedd in my latest article 'Colin Lester' doesnt display? I uploaded it in wiki commons and the image is named: Colin_Lester.png but when addin it at this section

{{Infobox musical artist |Img = |Name = Colin Lester | Img = Colin Lester.png | Img_capt = Colin Lester | Img_size = 147

it only displays this: File: Colin Lester.png

would you know if there is a time delay between uploading to wiki commons and the image displaying in the article or did i miss anything here? One thing is that if I perform a search in commons, it also shows no search results... would you know why?

this is the image i try to add:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Colin_Lester.PNG

could you edit the article Colin Lester in wikipedia and add this image for me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knersi1 ( talk • contribs) 17:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

thanks for your help

Knersi 1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knersi1 ( talk • contribs) 17:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't believe it is necessary for this individual to speak to me in this manner. Here [39] and here [40]. I've asked for a reference and in response I get;

• ".. I mean for fuck's sake, don't you see the double standard here."
• "Tell me, what is there to reference? Your lack of knowledge of a basic English word? Your blatant dislike for me and obviously, my people?"

Followed by the deletion of a reference. [41]

And this statement [42];

• "To conclude, I've decided that I truly don't give a fuck, I won't revert the "results" on this page anymore. There you fucking go."

-- Kansas Bear ( talk) 20:50, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi...

I just arrived at wikipedia and discovered a message waiting for me. Apparently you reverted a change that had been made to a page on wikipedia (earl of something, I believe).

Just letting you know that I have never made a change to anything on wikipedia.

Keep up the earnest and unending patrol to weed out those confounders of truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.27.196 ( talk) 01:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Looks like one of Anonymous' best (worst?) is going to need his talk page blocked for the duration of his block. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I changed my username yesterday and not I'm not autoconfirmed. Is there anyway you as an admin can change this sts so I can use twinkle and edit semi protected pages? There is a Road, No Simple Highway ( talk) 17:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but there is no way for an administrator to grant autoconfirmed status to a user who does not already have it. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Is it because you are still logged in on your old account? - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 17:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I had it until yesterday, How long do I have to wait until it forwards my watchlist and contrib history to the new one? I don't want to lose 3000 contribs. How do I log out of the old one? it has a redirect. There is a Road, No Simple Highway ( talk) 17:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

It is because you are still logged in on your old account. You see, that edit to this talk page came from Special:Contributions/HellinaBucket. Your new user name is User:Hell in a Bucket, log in as that and you'll have autoconfirmed back, along with your watchlist and contribs - Kingpin ¹³ ( talk) 17:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

( edit conflict) Try logging out and logging back in as your new username. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You sir are a genius, thank you it worked! Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 17:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm not vandalising u idiot, i'm changing that bike racers statistics to what they actually are, this guy only joined Moto GP two races ago so he has no rave wins or fastest laps, all statistsics from other seasons(apart from all time points, race starts and chapionships) stop reporting people when u don't know anything about it yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.248.188 ( talk) 21:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. It's not really any of my business, but I was wondering why you made this reversion. I couldn't think of any reason, nor was there any explanation in the edit summary, but I've seen you around enough to know that you don't really go around vandalising talk pages. There's still plenty for me to learn about what's going on behind the scenes here, so I just wanted to see what was up. Thanks. — Bdb484 ( talk) 02:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

I blocked the user who made that edit, so afterwords, I went through and undid all his edits. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about the mistake on the abuse filter. I think I fixed the problem now and am monitoring the latest change a little more closely. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 05:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

It's not a problem. You know enough to actually do something about it, I only know enough to know that that particular change was the one I needed to undo :P J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 05:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

You did the right thing. =) The latest revision is better behaved. No false positives anymore, though I suspect that it will not be as effective in the long run. The change probably makes things a little more dense to read, but it is not going to trip over so much stuff now. -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 05:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

You have been nominated for cabalship of the Cabal of Established Cabalists The Cabal of Established Cabalists will be a kind of union of who have made substantial and enduring drama to the encyclopedia for any period of time . Information on this cabal can be found at here - suggestions welcome. If you wish to be absorbed into the cabal, please simply sign here. Acceptance is mandatory. By not signing, you If you know of someone else who may be eligible for cabalship, please nominate them by copying this template.

NW ( Talk) 17:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

I was just posting as TruthPrevailsAgain and you blocked me and I don't understand why. My edits weren't vandalism at all, they were made in good faith. For example: The BOOMj article should say it targets Boomers and Jonesers. The references that were there clearly show that it shoulod include Jonesers. The 'about us' section of their website specifically says they target Boomers and Jonesers. The GenY page should read Boomers and Jonesers, as many artilces on this topic indicate. Why did you think I was vandalising? And why did you immediately block me 20 seconds after warning me? I follow this topic, and saw that another editor was blocked yesterday, and I'd like to help make these pages accurate. Would you please lift this block? Thank you. Blonde field ( talk) 17:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Could you please respond to this request? I'd like to make some edits but am concerned that you may mistakenly think that I'm vandalising. The edits I'll make are in good faith, based on my knowledge of these topics. Blonde field ( talk) 19:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

I blocked this incarnation; you are clearly a functional reincarnation of blocked WP:SOCKPUPPET TreadingWater. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

You may request an unblock (under User:TruthPrevailsAgain) using the normal procedures. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

You might wanna have a look at the above IP's talk page. - Jeremy ^{( v^_^v Cardmaker)} 19:48, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.