This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs about your comment of my topic ban. Do you really believe 9 days is long enough to see if a partial topic ban is working? For that is the length of time Martin Hogbin give it before claiming the even discussing things at the talk page is a COI editing, and then set up a vote for a full topic ban. Please read RegentsPark's view on the main case page and evidence page as they address this issue there. Blackash have a chat 05:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
All editors' behavior should be looked and going by Elen of the Roads comment that due to family trouble she has been unable study this properly. Elen quote "I have the sense that there have been other people who have been problematic, but not the time to look at it deeper. It's unfortunate" Will you please come and comment here about this. Blackash have a chat 08:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
– MuZemike 14:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
What is the difference between infobox and sidbar? Swmmr1928 talk 16:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! And no worries; you're at 43 and I'm at 5, I'm not going to catch up for years, if ever! -- Pres N 19:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. You closed File:Caylee anthony.jpg as delete, but did not actually delete it. Was this intentional? (Apologies if you were in the middle of doing so, but got sidetracked - I do that occasionally - get something half done while waiting for something to compile, then it finishes and I don't get back to it for a while.) -- B ( talk) 14:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
How?: mediation again? like Talk:War of the Pacific/Archive 7#Mediation of defensive/offensive issue.?, Best regrads, -- Keysanger ( what?) 20:58, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Archives of American Art Backstage Pass! - You are invited! | |
---|---|
The Smithsonian is hosting its first Backstage Pass at the Archives of American Art on Friday, July 29. 10 Wikimedians will experience the behind the scenes aspects of archiving the world's largest collection of documents and photographs related to American art. After a complimentary lunch, an edit-a-thon will take place and prizes will be awarded. Followed by an evening happy hour. We hope you'll participate! SarahStierch ( talk) 14:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
You are invited to the first Wikipedia Baltimore meetup on Saturday, July 23, 10:00am-12:30pm at the Walters Art Museum. Come meet Wikimedians, learn about GLAM-Wiki partnerships, get involved, and discuss future wiki outreach and activities in the Baltimore area!
There also is a Wikipedia & Cultural Heritage at the Young Preservationist Happy Hour on Friday, July 22, 6:30pm at the Midtown Yacht Club, an unpretentious neighborhood pub.
Note: You can remove your name from the Baltimore meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude
Hi! I saw, in Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_July_8#File:Caylee_anthony.jpg: "[...]or that she was a white girl and this was the reason for the coverage; but no secondary and reliable sources have been brought forth to support these assertions. The onus is on the defenders of non-free content to prove why it should remain, and no one in the discussion below did so. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 14:13, 15 July 2011 (UTC)"
In the case of Stephanie Kuhen there are RSes of people who did say "she's white, so that's why her case got focus" - So what I'll do is see if there are observers who distinctly say that in RSes related to Caylee Anthony. WhisperToMe ( talk) 02:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Way back in October '09 you took Goldfinger off the Good Articles list. A number of the issues you raised at the time have since been rectified, although some still need work done on them and there are probably a few new ones as well. I'd like to see the article get back on that list and I hoped you would be able to have a fresh look over it and provide some pointers as to where it could be further edited to reach the appropriate quality. Would you be able to do this, or would you know someone who could? I’ve just been through the same process with Dr No, which is now back on the GA list and Goldfinger would be a greatr way to follow this up. Many thanks! - Schrodinger's cat is alive ( talk) 08:38, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
It's not that I have a problem with those statements. Its that because they are uncited that there is an issue. Even the most lax members on citing plot would still require citations for vague or descriptive wording. This doesn't have to be secondary sources; it can include specific in-work citiations, but they need to be in-line. If they aren't its OR to say something is "enormous" or to say someone is still ignorant of the fact. 陣 内 Jinnai 15:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
GLAM Baltimore 2011 - You are invited! | |
---|---|
GLAM Baltimore 2011 is a series of GLAM related events that will take place July 22-23 in Baltimore. The weekend launches with a happy hour for emerging GLAM professionals and concludes the following day with a lively discussion and series of breakout sessions on the morning of the 23rd. Attendance to both is encouraged but not required. We do hope you'll participate for this exciting event! See you in Baltimore! SarahStierch ( talk) 13:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
You've been reverted. Thought you should know, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 21:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
The first ever WikiProject National Archives newsletter has been published. Please read on to find out what we're up to and how to help out! There are many opportunities for getting more involved. Dominic· t 21:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
|
I have to complaint. The account Jabbsworth is the 6 sockpuppet used by the known sockpuppeteer Ratel to evade his block [10] [11] and to edit disruptively and warring. I have been affected a lot of times because of this sockpuppeteer. Then I do not understand how Jabbsworth was recently unblocked, precisely just few day after he was blocked by Elockid due the same reason: sockpuppetry to evade a block and edit disruptively and warring. Why have not the affected users been heard? Will he be allowed to edit in the same topics and articles for he got his first blocks because of editing warring and disrputive?-- ClaudioSantos ¿? 00:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
DC Meetup 21 - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
---|---|
DC MEETUP 21 is July 29! This meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. See you Friday! SarahStierch ( talk) 16:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC) |
National Archives Backstage Pass - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
---|---|
On Saturday, August 6, the National Archives is hosting a Wikipedia meetup, backstage pass tour, and edit-a-thon in College Park, Maryland. Meet staff and fellow Wikipedians, go behind the scenes at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Dominic· t 21:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests#August 18 Dabomb87 ( talk) 17:30, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:24, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
JohnLloydScharf (
talk) 02:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
The hold on editing has been taken off without explanation, to my knowledge, as of this moment, without justification.
JohnLloydScharf (
talk) 00:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
The one who took this off the edit hold did so without reading the talk page.
JohnLloydScharf (
talk) 01:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
I refer to the article for J1c3d Y-DNA haplogroup as is indicated in the very first section of my User talk page.
Please see:
JohnLloydScharf (
talk) 01:51, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey David, now that things are heating up for Dota 2 and the page is edited more and more, with it becoming one of the most popular video game articles, I wrote some guide lines for recurring issues that have arisen during the page's history. As the main contributor for the original DotA, would you mind checking out my observations and commenting on their validity and what else might be needed? DarthBotto talk• cont 08:18, 03 August 2011 (UTC)
This is a reminder that the
National Archives Backstage Pass is tomorrow at 11 am. National Archives-themed chocolates and temporary tattoos await! Also, historical documents. :-) Please see the meetup page for updated information on transportation, security, and other other event details. Dominic· t 22:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC) |
Your undid reason is "src", but I don't know it's mean, could you explain it? Thanks!-- 铁铁的火大了 ( talk) 06:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Congratulations! | |
I know I'm a little late to the party, but... Thanks for all the work you did in making
Star Trek V: The Final Frontier a Featured Article! Your work is much appreciated.
In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to comment on another Featured article candidate... or perhaps review one of the Good Article nominees, as there is currently a backlog. Any help is appreciated! All the best, – Quadell ( talk) |
Red vs. Blue, a FA has a Refimprove tag - I imagine it'd be quite easy to fix, most of the tags are in the plot section - I'd fix, however I'm busy this whole month. Could you take a look? Thanks, Connormah ( talk) 22:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on August 18, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 18, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
" 200" is the sixth episode of the science fiction television series Stargate SG-1's tenth season, and the two-hundredth episode of the series overall. Unlike the more serious nature of the season's story arc, "200" is a light-hearted parody of both Stargate SG-1 and other sci-fi shows, as well as popular culture such as The Wizard of Oz. "200" won the 2007 Constellation Award for Best Overall 2006 Science Fiction Film or Television Script, and was nominated for the 2007 Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form. The episode also marks the first time original SG-1 member Jack O'Neill ( Richard Dean Anderson) is seen since the beginning of Season 9. The episode received a 1.9 average household rating, one of the few episodes of the season that surpassed the average rating of Stargate SG-1's previous season. "200" also received near-universal praise for its humor and writing. Despite the strong performance of the episode, the Sci-Fi Channel announced soon after the episode's airing it would not be renewing the series for another season. ( more...)
You may remember a recent Arbcom decision in which editors were requested to agree on an appropriate name for the article currently at Tree shaping. There has been a careful discussion on the subject, followed by an RfM which was hastily closed as 'No action' by involved administrator SilkTork. Was this what was envisaged by Arbcom? Perhaps you could take a look and give your opinion. Martin Hogbin ( talk) 22:48, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
The deletion of the Senkaku Islands mediation threads was unexpected. For me, the surprise was untimely. I hope that Feezo will be willing to explain this edit:
Regardless, please consider using your administrator's tools to provide me with a copy of the missing threads.
In order help make this possible, I have created a new sub-page. Please recreate copies of these useful diffs at User:Tenmei/Sandbox-Archive 1.
Nihonjoe suggested here that I may need to ask an arbitrator to do this. -- Tenmei ( talk) 23:06, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi David, this game (as discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.P.A.Z.) has indeed received relevant coverage now (GamePro, Rock Paper Shotgun, Atomic Gamer). I posted on Cirt's page, as they were the admin who closed the AFD, but they haven't been active for more than 3 weeks. Would you mind restoring the article so I can poke it with the sources? Someone another 11:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
i know...i just told him about it. I'll see what i can do. It doesn't seem like he's read the policies. Bread Ninja ( talk) 15:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Been invited to be part of the discussion to share your opinion whether List of LGBT characters in film, radio, and TV fiction should be deleted or not. this discussion is here here. Bread Ninja ( talk) 15:48, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I created a peer review for Dota 2 recently and I would very much like to hear your input for improvement. You don't need to worry about me stroking your ego, it only makes a reference to the fact that the original DotA is a FA and I'd like it to be the same for the sequel. DarthBotto talk• cont 17:01, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I corrected the "hot fix" patch info and tried to remove the redundant info from the characters section. I've addressed the rest. 陣 内 Jinnai 22:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
archieved, but I'd still like an answer to the last comment. You can post here or on the talk page. If you think it would be enough to be credible for the statement, I'll try and find a reassement of the PC game. If not, I'll not waste as much effort. 陣 内 Jinnai 19:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
-- Addi hockey 10 e-mail 03:42, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Just saw your comments there – where were you when I was arguing the same thing at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Wait Your Turn/1? ;) Two Hearted River ( paddle / fish) 18:49, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Pssst, remember my big project I was previously hinting of? After previously saying that you might have put too detail in your Star Trek movie articles, it is time for your revenge. Take a look at Conan the Barbarian (1982 film) and mosey along to Wikipedia:Peer review/Conan the Barbarian (1982 film)/archive1 to put your thoughts. Crom will thank thee for this. Jappalang ( talk) 01:37, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi David,
Just wondering what the reasons were for this revert?
It appears that OFLC is an antiquated body and that ACB is the correct organisation to reference for Australia.
Thanks, — Manti core 16:05, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey David, It seems as if I'm engaged in an edit war with an anonymous user who is using multiple proxy servers to make the same exact edit, (on Dota 2, he adds (Defense of the Ancients 2) to the intro and reverts all my edits), and there hasn't been action because apparently his main IP is a "stale" edit, considering he hasn't vandalized with it in a week. I've put in a request for administrator intervention, but somebody else is posting their comment, saying that the evidence is less-than-convincing, since the main IP I'm looking to indefinitely ban is stale.
What are your thoughts on this? If you should know, the IP addresses that have used this exact same edit are: 203.87.193.210, 64.255.164.95, 64.255.164.22 and 64.255.164.52. Now, bear in mind that several of the references in the article specifically state that it is not called "Defense of the Ancients 2", but "Dota 2", because Valve views it as a thing, rather than some acronym.
May you intervene with this? DarthBotto talk• cont 21:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, do you still intend to offer a new proposal or a change of wording? note - as he also commented along similar lines, I have asked the same question of Newyorkbrad. Off2riorob ( talk) 15:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
In response to your diff here, please acknowledge a question here. -- Tenmei ( talk) 18:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Cirt and Jayen466/Proposed decision#Proposed remedies
Hi - There appears to be a motion to close this case later today. In the case that you have not noticed - there are two new proposals predented by Newyorkbrad - 3.3.2.1 Cirt restricted from BLPs and 3.3.2.2 Cirt restricted from "political" biographies - that you have not voted in. Thank you for your attention to this. - Off2riorob ( talk) 01:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
I was just wondering if you were still planning to review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Anachronox/archive1? Another reviewer has also said they will be "doing" the review, but the peer review is about 25 days old and the bot archives things after 30 days, so it needs some feedback soon. If you cannot, I will try to review it tomorrow. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Fuchs:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Rainfall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Operation_Rainfall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crabbattler ( talk) 20:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
I sent you an email.
Atsme Atsme ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC).
hi.I need to help strongly. i have a question. you can check the users of other wikies?
thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.95.139.27 ( talk) 07:31, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
DC Meetup 23 & Annual Membership Meeting | |
---|---|
Wikimedia District of Columbia, the newest officially recognized chapter, is holding its Annual Membership Meeting at 1pm on Saturday, October 1, 2011 at the Tenley-Friendship Neighborhood Library. Agenda items include:
Candidate nominations are open until 11:59pm EDT on Saturday, September 24. We encourage you to consider being a candidate. (see see candidate instructions) The meeting is open to both the general public and members from within the DC-MD-VA-WV-DE region and beyond. We encourage everyone to attend! You may join the chapter at the meeting or online. |
Note: You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude
Thanks for the peer review. I'll let you know when it hits FAC. Feel free to give me an article you want copyedited or fixed up. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 01:20, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for posting the guidelines, and getting me started again. Here's to good editing.
Nelsondenis248 ( talk) 19:05, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
The article on the aspartame controversy does not address the controversy but instead promotes the industry’s side of the argument. ( or perhaps this is my bias) My efforts to add research that describes the other side of this controversy have met with failure. The article itself has 20 references to a paper paid for by the industry but presumedly written without knowledge of the sponsor. Do you have any ideas on making it a more NPV article. Or should i just give up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.172.214.170 ( talk) 14:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Part of the controversy is that many journal articles attest to the safety of aspartame but anyone who looks at consumer complaints sees a entirely different story. 75 % of all FDA complaints are due to aspartame. over 3000 complaints to CDC according to reference 8 in the article. Many many web sites ( including one I put up) attest to the harm done by aspartame.
But consumer complaints are not peer reviews. Thus they are ignored.
Perhaps I am a extremist but I tend to side more with actual cases of sick people instead of lab experiments. People do not get sick to verify lab experiments. The experiments are designed to prevent people from getting sick. In this case they may have failed.
Do you agree that it is OK to ignore the many testimonial accounts presented and only present the view of journal articles many of which are published by the industry. Or should the accounts of sick people be given equal creditability.
ps I hope it is ok to follow up at least once. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.172.214.170 ( talk) 13:33, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Very few days go by without me seeing edits by you to any number of Star Trek articles, which I always monitor. Whenever I see your name next to one, I know it's going to be an improvement of some kind! So - thanks for all your hard work! ῤerspeκὖlὖm in ænigmate (talk) (spy) 10:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hi David, was wondering the extent of images that the permission given in this ORTS ticket: [14] goes to. Just wondering because we're missing more photos of MLAs and there seem to be some in the same setting that haven't been uploaded, eg. [15], [16] [17] and [18]. Thanks in advance. – Connormah ( talk) 03:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
you sent me a message about editing wiki pages but the one on halo reach was a real fact not vandilism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude149 ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
At Tenmei banned for one year, you support a harsh sanction.
Please consider a less severe remedy in light of a wider contribution history which may have been overlooked -- see
In 2009, Roger Davies observed,
The Senkaku issues were not simple; but there you have it.
Even this diff does not alter your judgment in this instance, I hope it will influence your thinking in other cases which arise in the future? -- Tenmei ( talk) 04:26, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
National Archives Backstage Pass - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
---|---|
You are invited to the National Archives in College Park for a special backstage pass and scanathon meetup with Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, on Saturday, October 8. Go behind the scenes and into the stacks at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Free catered lunch provided! Dominic· t 16:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Dave. If it is not too much of a bother, could you take a quick look at Conan the Barbarian (1982 film) again? Yomangani had pruned and copy-edited it a great deal, and there were some other changes too. Do you think the current revision would stand a good chance at FAC? Jappalang ( talk) 01:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
english is not my fist language — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude149 ( talk • contribs) 12:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi.Please help me.Please tell me What I must do? I am new comer to wikipedia.I delete some mistakes and lies about Azerbaijan and Iran.But these two users User:Xooon and User:Alborz Fallah were plotting against me Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orartu to continue their lying about Iran and Azerbaijan.For example:When there is no valid source about Azerbaijani ancestry of a person, they insist to put them in category:Iranian people of Azerbaijani descent.This user User:Ebrahimi-amir and me are different users.But this user User:Xooon wants to intend we are same.They want to violate the neutrality of wikipedia.They want the deletion of this article Azerbaijani Genocide in Iran too.Please help me.In advance thanks a lot for your helps Orartu ( talk) 18:25, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I don't think you said what your try to say here (why would the fact that the old complaints cannot be validated speak against loosening the restrictions?). I also think what you try to say is dangerously wrong, but if it is your opinion, it should at least be clear. -- Stephan Schulz ( talk) 14:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Can you say which cases you have in mind? William M. Connolley ( talk) 20:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello there. I'm writing to tell you that the editors of the Signpost are making an effort to revive the long dormant Dispatches section. Your name is listed in the "Members" section, indicating that you have or had a willingness to help write or critique Dispatches.
Since the project was inactive for over a year, I have moved all of the names previously in the Members section to the "Inactive" subsection. If you no longer wish to participate in the capacity described above, you do not need to do anything, this will be the last time you hear from me on the matter of dispatches.
If you are, however, still interested in Dispatches, please go put your name back into the main members section. I will take that as an indication that it is okay to continue to send your way both Dispatch related messages and individuals seeking assistance with Dispatches in the areas you specified as being your specialties.
I personally am hoping to get at least one Dispatch out before 15 November, so that the section can avoid being officially inactive for a full year (the last dispatch was 15 November 2010). Cheers! Sven Manguard Wha? 08:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, you are listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Outreach as preferring the full contents of the latest WikiProject Film newsletter. There has been a transition in newsletter writing and distribution, so I wanted to ask if you still prefer the full contents (which may have been delivered with some inconsistency in the past) or if you are okay with a link to the newsletter page. Thanks, Erik ( talk | contribs) 19:49, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opened last weekend (10/28): Opening this weekend (11/4): Opening next weekend (11/11): Other November releases:
If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 11 – November 2011). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We couldn't do it without you! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
Wikipedia Loves Libraries DC & edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
Wikipedia Loves Libraries comes to DC on Saturday, November 5th, from 1-5pm, at the Martin Luther King Jr Memorial Library. We will be holding an edit-a-thon, working together to improve Wikipedia content related to DC history, arts, civil rights, or whatever suits your interests. There may also be opportunities to help with scanning historic photos plus some swag! You're invited and we hope to see you there! | |
Note: You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot ( talk) 18:41, 31 October 2011 (UTC), on behalf of User:Aude
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs about your comment of my topic ban. Do you really believe 9 days is long enough to see if a partial topic ban is working? For that is the length of time Martin Hogbin give it before claiming the even discussing things at the talk page is a COI editing, and then set up a vote for a full topic ban. Please read RegentsPark's view on the main case page and evidence page as they address this issue there. Blackash have a chat 05:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
All editors' behavior should be looked and going by Elen of the Roads comment that due to family trouble she has been unable study this properly. Elen quote "I have the sense that there have been other people who have been problematic, but not the time to look at it deeper. It's unfortunate" Will you please come and comment here about this. Blackash have a chat 08:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
– MuZemike 14:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
What is the difference between infobox and sidbar? Swmmr1928 talk 16:43, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! And no worries; you're at 43 and I'm at 5, I'm not going to catch up for years, if ever! -- Pres N 19:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. You closed File:Caylee anthony.jpg as delete, but did not actually delete it. Was this intentional? (Apologies if you were in the middle of doing so, but got sidetracked - I do that occasionally - get something half done while waiting for something to compile, then it finishes and I don't get back to it for a while.) -- B ( talk) 14:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
How?: mediation again? like Talk:War of the Pacific/Archive 7#Mediation of defensive/offensive issue.?, Best regrads, -- Keysanger ( what?) 20:58, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Archives of American Art Backstage Pass! - You are invited! | |
---|---|
The Smithsonian is hosting its first Backstage Pass at the Archives of American Art on Friday, July 29. 10 Wikimedians will experience the behind the scenes aspects of archiving the world's largest collection of documents and photographs related to American art. After a complimentary lunch, an edit-a-thon will take place and prizes will be awarded. Followed by an evening happy hour. We hope you'll participate! SarahStierch ( talk) 14:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
You are invited to the first Wikipedia Baltimore meetup on Saturday, July 23, 10:00am-12:30pm at the Walters Art Museum. Come meet Wikimedians, learn about GLAM-Wiki partnerships, get involved, and discuss future wiki outreach and activities in the Baltimore area!
There also is a Wikipedia & Cultural Heritage at the Young Preservationist Happy Hour on Friday, July 22, 6:30pm at the Midtown Yacht Club, an unpretentious neighborhood pub.
Note: You can remove your name from the Baltimore meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude
Hi! I saw, in Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2011_July_8#File:Caylee_anthony.jpg: "[...]or that she was a white girl and this was the reason for the coverage; but no secondary and reliable sources have been brought forth to support these assertions. The onus is on the defenders of non-free content to prove why it should remain, and no one in the discussion below did so. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 14:13, 15 July 2011 (UTC)"
In the case of Stephanie Kuhen there are RSes of people who did say "she's white, so that's why her case got focus" - So what I'll do is see if there are observers who distinctly say that in RSes related to Caylee Anthony. WhisperToMe ( talk) 02:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Way back in October '09 you took Goldfinger off the Good Articles list. A number of the issues you raised at the time have since been rectified, although some still need work done on them and there are probably a few new ones as well. I'd like to see the article get back on that list and I hoped you would be able to have a fresh look over it and provide some pointers as to where it could be further edited to reach the appropriate quality. Would you be able to do this, or would you know someone who could? I’ve just been through the same process with Dr No, which is now back on the GA list and Goldfinger would be a greatr way to follow this up. Many thanks! - Schrodinger's cat is alive ( talk) 08:38, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
It's not that I have a problem with those statements. Its that because they are uncited that there is an issue. Even the most lax members on citing plot would still require citations for vague or descriptive wording. This doesn't have to be secondary sources; it can include specific in-work citiations, but they need to be in-line. If they aren't its OR to say something is "enormous" or to say someone is still ignorant of the fact. 陣 内 Jinnai 15:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
GLAM Baltimore 2011 - You are invited! | |
---|---|
GLAM Baltimore 2011 is a series of GLAM related events that will take place July 22-23 in Baltimore. The weekend launches with a happy hour for emerging GLAM professionals and concludes the following day with a lively discussion and series of breakout sessions on the morning of the 23rd. Attendance to both is encouraged but not required. We do hope you'll participate for this exciting event! See you in Baltimore! SarahStierch ( talk) 13:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
You've been reverted. Thought you should know, -- Hammersoft ( talk) 21:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
The first ever WikiProject National Archives newsletter has been published. Please read on to find out what we're up to and how to help out! There are many opportunities for getting more involved. Dominic· t 21:20, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
|
I have to complaint. The account Jabbsworth is the 6 sockpuppet used by the known sockpuppeteer Ratel to evade his block [10] [11] and to edit disruptively and warring. I have been affected a lot of times because of this sockpuppeteer. Then I do not understand how Jabbsworth was recently unblocked, precisely just few day after he was blocked by Elockid due the same reason: sockpuppetry to evade a block and edit disruptively and warring. Why have not the affected users been heard? Will he be allowed to edit in the same topics and articles for he got his first blocks because of editing warring and disrputive?-- ClaudioSantos ¿? 00:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
DC Meetup 21 - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
---|---|
DC MEETUP 21 is July 29! This meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. See you Friday! SarahStierch ( talk) 16:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC) |
National Archives Backstage Pass - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
---|---|
On Saturday, August 6, the National Archives is hosting a Wikipedia meetup, backstage pass tour, and edit-a-thon in College Park, Maryland. Meet staff and fellow Wikipedians, go behind the scenes at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Dominic· t 21:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests#August 18 Dabomb87 ( talk) 17:30, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opened last weekend (7/29): Opening this weekend (8/5): Opening next weekend (8/12): Other August releases:
If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 8 – August 2011). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We couldn't do it without you! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:24, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
JohnLloydScharf (
talk) 02:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
The hold on editing has been taken off without explanation, to my knowledge, as of this moment, without justification.
JohnLloydScharf (
talk) 00:42, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
The one who took this off the edit hold did so without reading the talk page.
JohnLloydScharf (
talk) 01:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
I refer to the article for J1c3d Y-DNA haplogroup as is indicated in the very first section of my User talk page.
Please see:
JohnLloydScharf (
talk) 01:51, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey David, now that things are heating up for Dota 2 and the page is edited more and more, with it becoming one of the most popular video game articles, I wrote some guide lines for recurring issues that have arisen during the page's history. As the main contributor for the original DotA, would you mind checking out my observations and commenting on their validity and what else might be needed? DarthBotto talk• cont 08:18, 03 August 2011 (UTC)
This is a reminder that the
National Archives Backstage Pass is tomorrow at 11 am. National Archives-themed chocolates and temporary tattoos await! Also, historical documents. :-) Please see the meetup page for updated information on transportation, security, and other other event details. Dominic· t 22:25, 5 August 2011 (UTC) |
Your undid reason is "src", but I don't know it's mean, could you explain it? Thanks!-- 铁铁的火大了 ( talk) 06:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Congratulations! | |
I know I'm a little late to the party, but... Thanks for all the work you did in making
Star Trek V: The Final Frontier a Featured Article! Your work is much appreciated.
In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to comment on another Featured article candidate... or perhaps review one of the Good Article nominees, as there is currently a backlog. Any help is appreciated! All the best, – Quadell ( talk) |
Red vs. Blue, a FA has a Refimprove tag - I imagine it'd be quite easy to fix, most of the tags are in the plot section - I'd fix, however I'm busy this whole month. Could you take a look? Thanks, Connormah ( talk) 22:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on August 18, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 18, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
" 200" is the sixth episode of the science fiction television series Stargate SG-1's tenth season, and the two-hundredth episode of the series overall. Unlike the more serious nature of the season's story arc, "200" is a light-hearted parody of both Stargate SG-1 and other sci-fi shows, as well as popular culture such as The Wizard of Oz. "200" won the 2007 Constellation Award for Best Overall 2006 Science Fiction Film or Television Script, and was nominated for the 2007 Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form. The episode also marks the first time original SG-1 member Jack O'Neill ( Richard Dean Anderson) is seen since the beginning of Season 9. The episode received a 1.9 average household rating, one of the few episodes of the season that surpassed the average rating of Stargate SG-1's previous season. "200" also received near-universal praise for its humor and writing. Despite the strong performance of the episode, the Sci-Fi Channel announced soon after the episode's airing it would not be renewing the series for another season. ( more...)
You may remember a recent Arbcom decision in which editors were requested to agree on an appropriate name for the article currently at Tree shaping. There has been a careful discussion on the subject, followed by an RfM which was hastily closed as 'No action' by involved administrator SilkTork. Was this what was envisaged by Arbcom? Perhaps you could take a look and give your opinion. Martin Hogbin ( talk) 22:48, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
The deletion of the Senkaku Islands mediation threads was unexpected. For me, the surprise was untimely. I hope that Feezo will be willing to explain this edit:
Regardless, please consider using your administrator's tools to provide me with a copy of the missing threads.
In order help make this possible, I have created a new sub-page. Please recreate copies of these useful diffs at User:Tenmei/Sandbox-Archive 1.
Nihonjoe suggested here that I may need to ask an arbitrator to do this. -- Tenmei ( talk) 23:06, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi David, this game (as discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.P.A.Z.) has indeed received relevant coverage now (GamePro, Rock Paper Shotgun, Atomic Gamer). I posted on Cirt's page, as they were the admin who closed the AFD, but they haven't been active for more than 3 weeks. Would you mind restoring the article so I can poke it with the sources? Someone another 11:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
i know...i just told him about it. I'll see what i can do. It doesn't seem like he's read the policies. Bread Ninja ( talk) 15:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Been invited to be part of the discussion to share your opinion whether List of LGBT characters in film, radio, and TV fiction should be deleted or not. this discussion is here here. Bread Ninja ( talk) 15:48, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I created a peer review for Dota 2 recently and I would very much like to hear your input for improvement. You don't need to worry about me stroking your ego, it only makes a reference to the fact that the original DotA is a FA and I'd like it to be the same for the sequel. DarthBotto talk• cont 17:01, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
I corrected the "hot fix" patch info and tried to remove the redundant info from the characters section. I've addressed the rest. 陣 内 Jinnai 22:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
archieved, but I'd still like an answer to the last comment. You can post here or on the talk page. If you think it would be enough to be credible for the statement, I'll try and find a reassement of the PC game. If not, I'll not waste as much effort. 陣 内 Jinnai 19:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
-- Addi hockey 10 e-mail 03:42, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Just saw your comments there – where were you when I was arguing the same thing at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Wait Your Turn/1? ;) Two Hearted River ( paddle / fish) 18:49, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Pssst, remember my big project I was previously hinting of? After previously saying that you might have put too detail in your Star Trek movie articles, it is time for your revenge. Take a look at Conan the Barbarian (1982 film) and mosey along to Wikipedia:Peer review/Conan the Barbarian (1982 film)/archive1 to put your thoughts. Crom will thank thee for this. Jappalang ( talk) 01:37, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi David,
Just wondering what the reasons were for this revert?
It appears that OFLC is an antiquated body and that ACB is the correct organisation to reference for Australia.
Thanks, — Manti core 16:05, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hey David, It seems as if I'm engaged in an edit war with an anonymous user who is using multiple proxy servers to make the same exact edit, (on Dota 2, he adds (Defense of the Ancients 2) to the intro and reverts all my edits), and there hasn't been action because apparently his main IP is a "stale" edit, considering he hasn't vandalized with it in a week. I've put in a request for administrator intervention, but somebody else is posting their comment, saying that the evidence is less-than-convincing, since the main IP I'm looking to indefinitely ban is stale.
What are your thoughts on this? If you should know, the IP addresses that have used this exact same edit are: 203.87.193.210, 64.255.164.95, 64.255.164.22 and 64.255.164.52. Now, bear in mind that several of the references in the article specifically state that it is not called "Defense of the Ancients 2", but "Dota 2", because Valve views it as a thing, rather than some acronym.
May you intervene with this? DarthBotto talk• cont 21:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, do you still intend to offer a new proposal or a change of wording? note - as he also commented along similar lines, I have asked the same question of Newyorkbrad. Off2riorob ( talk) 15:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
In response to your diff here, please acknowledge a question here. -- Tenmei ( talk) 18:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Cirt and Jayen466/Proposed decision#Proposed remedies
Hi - There appears to be a motion to close this case later today. In the case that you have not noticed - there are two new proposals predented by Newyorkbrad - 3.3.2.1 Cirt restricted from BLPs and 3.3.2.2 Cirt restricted from "political" biographies - that you have not voted in. Thank you for your attention to this. - Off2riorob ( talk) 01:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
I was just wondering if you were still planning to review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Anachronox/archive1? Another reviewer has also said they will be "doing" the review, but the peer review is about 25 days old and the bot archives things after 30 days, so it needs some feedback soon. If you cannot, I will try to review it tomorrow. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Fuchs:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Rainfall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Operation_Rainfall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crabbattler ( talk) 20:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
I sent you an email.
Atsme Atsme ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC).
hi.I need to help strongly. i have a question. you can check the users of other wikies?
thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.95.139.27 ( talk) 07:31, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
DC Meetup 23 & Annual Membership Meeting | |
---|---|
Wikimedia District of Columbia, the newest officially recognized chapter, is holding its Annual Membership Meeting at 1pm on Saturday, October 1, 2011 at the Tenley-Friendship Neighborhood Library. Agenda items include:
Candidate nominations are open until 11:59pm EDT on Saturday, September 24. We encourage you to consider being a candidate. (see see candidate instructions) The meeting is open to both the general public and members from within the DC-MD-VA-WV-DE region and beyond. We encourage everyone to attend! You may join the chapter at the meeting or online. |
Note: You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude
Thanks for the peer review. I'll let you know when it hits FAC. Feel free to give me an article you want copyedited or fixed up. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 01:20, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for posting the guidelines, and getting me started again. Here's to good editing.
Nelsondenis248 ( talk) 19:05, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
The article on the aspartame controversy does not address the controversy but instead promotes the industry’s side of the argument. ( or perhaps this is my bias) My efforts to add research that describes the other side of this controversy have met with failure. The article itself has 20 references to a paper paid for by the industry but presumedly written without knowledge of the sponsor. Do you have any ideas on making it a more NPV article. Or should i just give up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.172.214.170 ( talk) 14:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Part of the controversy is that many journal articles attest to the safety of aspartame but anyone who looks at consumer complaints sees a entirely different story. 75 % of all FDA complaints are due to aspartame. over 3000 complaints to CDC according to reference 8 in the article. Many many web sites ( including one I put up) attest to the harm done by aspartame.
But consumer complaints are not peer reviews. Thus they are ignored.
Perhaps I am a extremist but I tend to side more with actual cases of sick people instead of lab experiments. People do not get sick to verify lab experiments. The experiments are designed to prevent people from getting sick. In this case they may have failed.
Do you agree that it is OK to ignore the many testimonial accounts presented and only present the view of journal articles many of which are published by the industry. Or should the accounts of sick people be given equal creditability.
ps I hope it is ok to follow up at least once. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.172.214.170 ( talk) 13:33, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Very few days go by without me seeing edits by you to any number of Star Trek articles, which I always monitor. Whenever I see your name next to one, I know it's going to be an improvement of some kind! So - thanks for all your hard work! ῤerspeκὖlὖm in ænigmate (talk) (spy) 10:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hi David, was wondering the extent of images that the permission given in this ORTS ticket: [14] goes to. Just wondering because we're missing more photos of MLAs and there seem to be some in the same setting that haven't been uploaded, eg. [15], [16] [17] and [18]. Thanks in advance. – Connormah ( talk) 03:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
you sent me a message about editing wiki pages but the one on halo reach was a real fact not vandilism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude149 ( talk • contribs) 15:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
At Tenmei banned for one year, you support a harsh sanction.
Please consider a less severe remedy in light of a wider contribution history which may have been overlooked -- see
In 2009, Roger Davies observed,
The Senkaku issues were not simple; but there you have it.
Even this diff does not alter your judgment in this instance, I hope it will influence your thinking in other cases which arise in the future? -- Tenmei ( talk) 04:26, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
National Archives Backstage Pass - Who should come? You should. Really. | |
---|---|
You are invited to the National Archives in College Park for a special backstage pass and scanathon meetup with Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, on Saturday, October 8. Go behind the scenes and into the stacks at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Free catered lunch provided! Dominic· t 16:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Dave. If it is not too much of a bother, could you take a quick look at Conan the Barbarian (1982 film) again? Yomangani had pruned and copy-edited it a great deal, and there were some other changes too. Do you think the current revision would stand a good chance at FAC? Jappalang ( talk) 01:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
english is not my fist language — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dude149 ( talk • contribs) 12:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi.Please help me.Please tell me What I must do? I am new comer to wikipedia.I delete some mistakes and lies about Azerbaijan and Iran.But these two users User:Xooon and User:Alborz Fallah were plotting against me Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orartu to continue their lying about Iran and Azerbaijan.For example:When there is no valid source about Azerbaijani ancestry of a person, they insist to put them in category:Iranian people of Azerbaijani descent.This user User:Ebrahimi-amir and me are different users.But this user User:Xooon wants to intend we are same.They want to violate the neutrality of wikipedia.They want the deletion of this article Azerbaijani Genocide in Iran too.Please help me.In advance thanks a lot for your helps Orartu ( talk) 18:25, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I don't think you said what your try to say here (why would the fact that the old complaints cannot be validated speak against loosening the restrictions?). I also think what you try to say is dangerously wrong, but if it is your opinion, it should at least be clear. -- Stephan Schulz ( talk) 14:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Can you say which cases you have in mind? William M. Connolley ( talk) 20:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello there. I'm writing to tell you that the editors of the Signpost are making an effort to revive the long dormant Dispatches section. Your name is listed in the "Members" section, indicating that you have or had a willingness to help write or critique Dispatches.
Since the project was inactive for over a year, I have moved all of the names previously in the Members section to the "Inactive" subsection. If you no longer wish to participate in the capacity described above, you do not need to do anything, this will be the last time you hear from me on the matter of dispatches.
If you are, however, still interested in Dispatches, please go put your name back into the main members section. I will take that as an indication that it is okay to continue to send your way both Dispatch related messages and individuals seeking assistance with Dispatches in the areas you specified as being your specialties.
I personally am hoping to get at least one Dispatch out before 15 November, so that the section can avoid being officially inactive for a full year (the last dispatch was 15 November 2010). Cheers! Sven Manguard Wha? 08:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, you are listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Outreach as preferring the full contents of the latest WikiProject Film newsletter. There has been a transition in newsletter writing and distribution, so I wanted to ask if you still prefer the full contents (which may have been delivered with some inconsistency in the past) or if you are okay with a link to the newsletter page. Thanks, Erik ( talk | contribs) 19:49, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opened last weekend (10/28): Opening this weekend (11/4): Opening next weekend (11/11): Other November releases:
If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 11 – November 2011). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We couldn't do it without you! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
Wikipedia Loves Libraries DC & edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
Wikipedia Loves Libraries comes to DC on Saturday, November 5th, from 1-5pm, at the Martin Luther King Jr Memorial Library. We will be holding an edit-a-thon, working together to improve Wikipedia content related to DC history, arts, civil rights, or whatever suits your interests. There may also be opportunities to help with scanning historic photos plus some swag! You're invited and we hope to see you there! | |
Note: You can remove your name from the DC meetup invite list here. -- Message delivered by AudeBot ( talk) 18:41, 31 October 2011 (UTC), on behalf of User:Aude