- Paleface Jack ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
- Paleface Jack ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Shanamartin17". The reason given for Shanamartin17's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: user:Shanarenee17".
Accept reason: Autoblock lifted. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 17:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Paleface Jack ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The same IP address was used by another user, similar to the last time I was blocked. I always edit articles on this account and have never abused Wikipiedia's policies before. Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to exactly follow the instructions that appear when you attempt to edit, in order for us to find and lift the autoblock. Yamla ( talk) 18:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
 | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #79 |
|
November 4, 2015 — December 24, 2017 February 12, 2018 — June 13, 2018 June 30, 2018 — December 27, 2018 December 28, 2018 — August 5, 2019 November 6, 2019 — August 6, 2020 |
New Texas Chainsaw film incoming. Dark knight 2149 03:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Darkknight2149 Pretty exciting! Been working on a couple of articles in the mean time before going back to the old Leatherface article expansion. I have sort of been putting that off considering how big a scope that article is.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Greetings,
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Thank you once again for being part of this global event! -- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
 | Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi Jack; I'm really pleased to see you've brought this back to FAC. I'm not sure I'll have the time for a full review, but I'll try. It's definitely a worthy topic. Josh Milburn ( talk) 20:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- I do encourage you to go through the references with a fine-toothed comb... I'm still seeing lots of bizarre formatting. I fixed a few very quickly, but, for example: "Anon. (September 25, 2016). "Begotten & Shadow of the Vampire Double Feature with Director E. Elias Merhige in Person!". DO312.com. DO312.com. Retrieved July 15, 2017." The repetition really isn't needed! Josh Milburn ( talk) 20:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
J Milburn Thanks for the heads up. I did some looking over the sources and one of the websites I use as a source is down and was not archived and I do not know what to do about that.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 22:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- This is some of what I'm getting at. You may get some opposition based only on the source formatting, but I think you're going to get questions about the reliability of a lot of the sources you're citing. Just one example -- what is the Dennis Schwartz source? In fact, I think some of your formatting is going to lead people to question the reliability... Revolver is surely a perfectly reliable source when it comes to claims about Marilyn Manson's influences, but the formatting of the source -- Bennett, J (January 5, 2019). "Marilyn Manson's 'Antichrist Superstar': The Story Behind the Album Cover Art". RevolverMag.com. J. Bennett. Retrieved July 12, 2019. -- is a bit all over the place. I think it's going to be worth your while to sit down with this for an hour or two and try to tidy this all up. Josh Milburn ( talk) 20:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
J Milburn I went over the sources and removed the ones that had the listed issue. in terms of Author/Publisher issue, are you saying I should not do "Author first and last name" and just list them as the publisher when appropriate?-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 21:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- I am not. List the author as the author; the author is not (usually) the publisher. You don't need to include a publisher for periodicals (newspapers, magazines, academic journals, etc.) -- the periodical name is enough, especially if you can provide a wikilink. Meanwhile, there's no need to repeat the name of (say) a website as both the "work"/"website" and the "publisher". Josh Milburn ( talk) 17:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Okay, I think I understand what you mean now.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 18:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! |
|
Hello Paleface Jack, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
 | |
| One year! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt Thanks!-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 18:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
In 2016 you tagged the Critical response section of The Gift (film) with {{ Expand section}}. [1] I've expanded it with several reviews and removed the tag. Please do take a look. Article could still do with some Production information though. -- 109.79.172.81 ( talk) 04:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amsterdamned, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Point of view.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy (Black Christmas), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unsolved murder.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Jack. Just a small favour, please. Could I ask you to comment out the project banners in User talk:Paleface Jack/Judge Holden (Revision) as they create invalid entries in their various maintenance categories. We use these to track project status. Thanks and all the best. No Great Shaker ( talk) 07:29, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.-- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! -- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for uploading File:Billy, Black Christmas, 1974 film, screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Dee Richards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alias.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Paleface Jack: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ★Trekker ( talk) 18:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Possum (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Jones.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
|
| |
| Two years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Possum (2018 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Possum (2018 film) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Gerald Waldo Luis --
Gerald Waldo Luis (
talk) 15:40, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hey there, just wondering if you're still able to respond to the review. I've purposefully left it on the non-prose so you can work it out bit by bit.
Gerald
WL 01:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @ Gerald Waldo Luis: Yeah just a little busy at the moment. Been sort of quietly editing the article. Will be able to do more edits during the weekend.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 05:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Possum (2018 film)
The article
Possum (2018 film) you nominated as a
good article has passed 
; see
Talk:Possum (2018 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Gerald Waldo Luis --
Gerald Waldo Luis (
talk) 19:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Dee Richards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Newton.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
ım a fictional character pages lover too can you help me with /info/en/?search=Lawrence_Gordon_(character) page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volkan1881 ( talk • contribs) 14:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
-
@Volkan1881 I will take a look at it as soon as I can. I currently working on a massive expansion project on a major/influential horror character at the moment so that has been pretty much occupying my time. But i will look over this character you have been doing.---17:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)~
Paleface Jack (
talk) 17:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- thank you so much Volkan1881 ( talk) 04:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Dear Paleface Jack I understand you like horror movies so much that's why I have a request for you for the article
horror film on its history section can you split the 2010s to present content into two decade contents to restore the 2010s content and the 2020s content that why they can match other decades like this.
1930s
1940s
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
2020s
These are what the decades are supposed to be on there can you restore 2010s and 2020s?
ScarfaceJohnny (
talk) 05:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
-
@ScarfaceJohnny Hey mate, sorry for the late reply. Unfortunately I am currently swamped working on a massive expansion project on a horror character so I will most likely be unable to look over that article for you. I agree that the article really needs some attention but I think it will be a lot more in depth than anyone thinks.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Please be aware that user:ScarfaceJohnny is a sockpuppet of a banned user "Jinnifer" who haunts the horror film article and
badgers other users into making her
WP:OR vandalisms and otherwise edit-warring on her behalf.--
Mr Fink (
talk) 20:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Apokryltaros had a feeling thanks though Paleface Jack ( talk) 23:32, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Please be aware that user:ScarfaceJohnny is a sockpuppet of a banned user "Jinnifer" who haunts the horror film article and
badgers other users into making her
WP:OR vandalisms and otherwise edit-warring on her behalf.--
Mr Fink (
talk) 20:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
hello paleface jack ım doing tf2 soldier page ı learned making character pages on wiki but ı still not know how ı found not copyrighted photo for pages can you give me a advice? Volkan1881 ( talk) 12:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
-
@Volkan1881 usually with things like that they are always gonna be copyrighted. I would look at other images from either similar video game characters on Wikipiedia and see how they do theirs. there is something you can look up in our help search that shows how to properly use copyrighted images as long as their fair use.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- thanks Volkan1881 ( talk) 15:47, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry I haven't been as active as I should be. I'm stretched pretty thinned. However, I am going to have to force myself to make time pretty soon in order to finish the Hellraiser reboot draft, because Hulu just announced that it's coming out in October (which puts me on a times table). I'll try to put some more work into the Leatherface draft when I get to work on that. Dark knight 2149 19:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Darkknight2149 thats fine mate. If memory serves me correctly you dont need to work on the reboot draft since there is an article already created. i have been working on the leatherface article a lot and have not gotten to the newer films just yet so take your time. I can try to pitch in on the hellraiser reboot if you like. Paleface Jack ( talk) 19:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2023! |
|
Hello Paleface Jack, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2023. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
★Trekker ( talk) 00:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
When you say "yet to get" do you mean you're waiting for the DVD that has this feature? Is that what you're wanting assistance with, or something else? I think you have enough to just move the information to the article and finish the article from there. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 15:27, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
-
@Bignole There is a dvd that has that info. I have not found it in stores as of yet. It seems like it would be a big point of critique would be the missing info on the Leatherface film. Call me a completionist, my goal is to get this up to FA. Also I have ideas for alternate images that are gonna be used for the main infobox.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:45, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- that and I am just trying to figure out if there are any sources that I can use that tell who did the design of the character in that film. Paleface Jack ( talk) 16:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- If I have time, I'll check my copy to see if they cover it. Is it under a specific feature? As for the article, you can move it without it going up for FA review. Here's the catch, if you completely revamp the article, you will be automatically denied at an FA review if you have just recently moved it into the mainspace. One of the things they are going to look at is public access for peer reviews. Jason Voorhees went through peer reviews and a GA review before ever seeing the FA review after I rewrote the page. It had other editors fine tuning in the mainspace for a bit of time.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 17:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
-
@Bignole yeah I kinda figured. FA status is the end goal cause of the significance of the character. Did you know and GA status will be goals once stuff gets transfered but FA is final goal. As for the information i think its in the "Man Behind the Bloody mask" featurette, I have the exact name of the featurette that might have the info in the userspace draft I have in the design subsection ("crafting the mask" as its called). Anyways thanks for the help and advice man, really stoked to finally reveal all this hard work to the outside world.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 17:10, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Just to be sure, which film in question are you looking at for this featurette? There is technically more than one film with "Leatherface" as the title.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 14:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Bignole yeah. It's the 2017 prequel. Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Just to be sure, which film in question are you looking at for this featurette? There is technically more than one film with "Leatherface" as the title.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 14:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
-
@Bignole yeah I kinda figured. FA status is the end goal cause of the significance of the character. Did you know and GA status will be goals once stuff gets transfered but FA is final goal. As for the information i think its in the "Man Behind the Bloody mask" featurette, I have the exact name of the featurette that might have the info in the userspace draft I have in the design subsection ("crafting the mask" as its called). Anyways thanks for the help and advice man, really stoked to finally reveal all this hard work to the outside world.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 17:10, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- If I have time, I'll check my copy to see if they cover it. Is it under a specific feature? As for the article, you can move it without it going up for FA review. Here's the catch, if you completely revamp the article, you will be automatically denied at an FA review if you have just recently moved it into the mainspace. One of the things they are going to look at is public access for peer reviews. Jason Voorhees went through peer reviews and a GA review before ever seeing the FA review after I rewrote the page. It had other editors fine tuning in the mainspace for a bit of time.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 17:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
If I get a chance, I'll try to view the bluray featurette this weekend for you. In the meantime, is the "cancer" stuff from the most recent movie? I don't recall him ever having cancer? The same with superhuman strength. He's strong, but not any stronger than the average person his size. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Bignole: The 2022 entry has no mention of cancer, as that was a part of the remake timeline. As for Superhuman strength, he does display this on several occasions from some entries in the franchise but I dont really explain or explore that cause it is irrelevant to the article atm. Anyways, rn I am not only fixing citations and whatnot but also trying to colorize a black and white image of the original character cause I cant seem to find a color version of the image and I really want it as the main image for the infobox. Thanks for the help mate!-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 21:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- He's shown to be strong, but not superhuman. If it isn't identified that way, then the category could not be appropriate. As for the other, I see Wikipedia mentions "tumors", but I only recall the films identifying it as a basic skin disease that ate away part of his face.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 21:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole he is shown superhuman strenth in 2 entries and in the remake series he is said to have skin cancer and is mentioned to have it.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- i can always find a reference for that Paleface Jack ( talk) 21:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole If you are referring to the main article space then ye that wouldnt mention the cancer or the strength. The article I am referencing is my
revision draft. Looking over some pieces of information there are a couple mentions of Leatherface having superhuman strength. I might include those in the draft then tranfer all the info to the main article.--
Paleface Jack (
talk) 22:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Who mentions this? It isn't stated in the films themselves. As for the cancer, I don't recall that and would have to watch the prequel again. I recall them mentioning a skin diseasae. Cancer would have killed him, as his family wouldn't have had money for treatment.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 15:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole they mention it in the first remake and ans is published in multiple sources, filmmakers also mention this in interviews. its skin cancer for starters, and its also a movie so...
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- As for superhuman strength, only the third film and the 2022 film versions display superhuman strength.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- What are you referencing with the superhuman strength?
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 21:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole for now CBR but I am gonna look for more sources
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- What are you referencing in the film itself? Someone's interpretation that because he's so strong it must be superhuman doesn't mean that it was superhuman. CBR says some stupid shit all the time. If you use a category for a film character that is based around characteristics, then they need to be things established in the official lore and not interpretations.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 21:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole yeah thats why I am lookin around.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- btw did you find anything in that special feature of leatherface (2017)? Paleface Jack ( talk) 22:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole yeah thats why I am lookin around.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- What are you referencing in the film itself? Someone's interpretation that because he's so strong it must be superhuman doesn't mean that it was superhuman. CBR says some stupid shit all the time. If you use a category for a film character that is based around characteristics, then they need to be things established in the official lore and not interpretations.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 21:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole for now CBR but I am gonna look for more sources
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- What are you referencing with the superhuman strength?
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 21:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- As for superhuman strength, only the third film and the 2022 film versions display superhuman strength.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole they mention it in the first remake and ans is published in multiple sources, filmmakers also mention this in interviews. its skin cancer for starters, and its also a movie so...
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Who mentions this? It isn't stated in the films themselves. As for the cancer, I don't recall that and would have to watch the prequel again. I recall them mentioning a skin diseasae. Cancer would have killed him, as his family wouldn't have had money for treatment.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 15:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole he is shown superhuman strenth in 2 entries and in the remake series he is said to have skin cancer and is mentioned to have it.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leatherface, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Myers, Jigsaw and Comico.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
|
| |
| Three years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks mate, much appreciated. Happy editing yourself, you deserve just as much appreciation as I!-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 18:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:The McPherson Tape (UFO Abduction) 1989 film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
_1989_film_poster.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Lake Michigan Monster, 2018, release poster.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
Your GA nomination of Leatherface
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Leatherface you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Thebiguglyalien --
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 16:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Leatherface
The article
Leatherface you nominated as a
good article has failed 
; see
Talk:Leatherface for reasons why
the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Thebiguglyalien --
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 17:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I don't understand the "Quick Fail" and I've posted a note on the GA page to see what it's all about and for help in understanding how Leatherface meets criteria for it. I also still not sure why people suddenly dislike some of the section headers and how no one can actually provide direct guidelines on them having to be some basic title. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Bignole same. i mean I get some of the criticism to the length which is why I removed some things. But because of how complex leatherface is, it needs to be that length Paleface Jack ( talk) 21:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm about to go into a meeting, but I'll do a passover of the plot when I'm done. With the exception of the most recent film, I can go through the rest and trim them up. That should cut quite a bit of the length off. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Sounds good. you can always ask questions if need be.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 22:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I trimmed the plot outside of the new film. I'll try to go through it more when I have more time and look at the rest of the article. I was actually surprised that it has 3k more words than the Jason article. LOL.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 23:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Bignole well it took a year or more to do. that and the complexity of the character necessitated the length. Paleface Jack ( talk) 23:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think the complaint is that it isn't covering enough or that the character isn't complex, only that there's probably a lot of fluff within the writing. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 15:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, information that is best suited for individual film articles and whatnot.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 16:39, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- The best advice I could give you is to go join GA and FA reviews of articles you haven't worked on. Pay attention to the feedback given and requests for changes. While not all 100% is good feedback (i.e. subjective), you can learn a lot viewing from a neutral eye (i.e., you didn't contribute to the article and thus have no stake in the game).
- Next, go hang around the Guild of CopyEditors and the projects being worked on. You don't need to contribute, so much as you should see how they copyedit articles.
- As far as Leatherface goes. Re-read the article and if you read something that has nothing to do with Leatherface directly (e.g., discussion about changes to Erin in the novelization) then it should probably be removed. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:48, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Alright, sounds good. Will go back to that article a little later as I am working on creating one for a film.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:51, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Troika (1969 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Troika (1969 film) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vaticidalprophet --
Vaticidalprophet (
talk) 09:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Troika (1969 film)
The article
Troika (1969 film) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Troika (1969 film) and
Talk:Troika (1969 film)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vaticidalprophet --
Vaticidalprophet (
talk) 18:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Vaticidalprophet sounds good. I will get started on some edist tonight and the rest of the week. Paleface Jack ( talk) 18:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Troika (1969 film)
The article
Troika (1969 film) you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Troika (1969 film) for comments about the article, and
Talk:Troika (1969 film)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vaticidalprophet --
Vaticidalprophet (
talk) 17:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Please, can you help me with that request? Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.180.136.168 ( talk) 09:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
-
@80.180.136.168 I will see what I can do when I have the time. The Japanese wikipiedia article has over 50 citations, though it's a matter of sifting through reliable ones.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 14:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you very much. I wait for good news. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
193.207.152.8 (
talk) 15:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- @193.207.152.8 unfortunately the article is really poorly written and undersourced.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Have read well? My request is to create those five pages related with that incident, translating them from Japanese to English, not a revision of the "Sankebetsu brown bear incident". I've already edit their red links there.
- @193.207.152.8 unfortunately the article is really poorly written and undersourced.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you very much. I wait for good news. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
193.207.152.8 (
talk) 15:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
I am fully aware of that request. It would not make sense to leave the main article it is based on in such a poor state. But the one film article I will take a look at.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 23:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, but don't forget those five pages when you'll have time. Thank you very much.
Many of his manga series are only in Japanese Wikipedia: ja:おらが村, ja:新・おらが村, ja:マタギ (漫画), ja:かつみ, ja:ニッポン博物誌, ja:ふるさと (漫画), ja:激濤 Magnitude 7.7. Can you translate them in English, and maybe also expand his own page and Fisherman Sanpei? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.2.62.220 ( talk) 10:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Can you do it? 79.16.244.59 ( talk) 10:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Please, can you help me with these translations from Japanese to English: Kotanbetsu ( ja:古丹別駅), Onishika ( ja:鬼鹿村), Brown Bear Storm ( ja:羆嵐), Japan Hunting Friends Association ( ja:大日本猟友会), Hokkaido Government Police Department ( ja:北海道庁警察部), Haboro Police Station ( ja:羽幌警察署), 28th Infantry Regiment (Japan) ( ja:歩兵第28連隊), Japan Action Enterprise ( ja:ジャパンアクションエンタープライズ), Kaoru Takagi ( ja:高木薫), Hokkaido Wine ( ja:北海道ワイン), Karasumaru family ( ja:烏丸家), Taisha Station ( ja:大社駅), Motoko Baba ( ja:馬場元子), Maiasa Shinbun ( ja:毎朝新聞), Champion Futoshi ( ja:チャンピオン太)? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.207.113.11 ( talk) 22:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Can you do it? 79.16.244.59 ( talk) 10:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
- Tarticles such as these are not my specialty so, unfortionately, no.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 21:56, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Adapted from {{ Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page.
Hope to see a wonderful new year of great work from you on horror articles. ★Trekker ( talk) 13:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
|
| |
| Four years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Paleface Jack ( talk) 20:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Varan you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grungaloo --
Grungaloo (
talk) 02:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
The article
Varan you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Varan and
Talk:Varan/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grungaloo --
Grungaloo (
talk) 16:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
The article
Varan you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Varan for comments about the article, and
Talk:Varan/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grungaloo --
Grungaloo (
talk) 00:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Paleface Jack ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
- Paleface Jack ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Shanamartin17". The reason given for Shanamartin17's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: user:Shanarenee17".
Accept reason: Autoblock lifted. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 17:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Paleface Jack ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The same IP address was used by another user, similar to the last time I was blocked. I always edit articles on this account and have never abused Wikipiedia's policies before. Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to exactly follow the instructions that appear when you attempt to edit, in order for us to find and lift the autoblock. Yamla ( talk) 18:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
| |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #79 |
|
November 4, 2015 — December 24, 2017 February 12, 2018 — June 13, 2018 June 30, 2018 — December 27, 2018 December 28, 2018 — August 5, 2019 November 6, 2019 — August 6, 2020 |
New Texas Chainsaw film incoming. Dark knight 2149 03:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Darkknight2149 Pretty exciting! Been working on a couple of articles in the mean time before going back to the old Leatherface article expansion. I have sort of been putting that off considering how big a scope that article is.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:18, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Greetings,
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Thank you once again for being part of this global event! -- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hi Jack; I'm really pleased to see you've brought this back to FAC. I'm not sure I'll have the time for a full review, but I'll try. It's definitely a worthy topic. Josh Milburn ( talk) 20:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- I do encourage you to go through the references with a fine-toothed comb... I'm still seeing lots of bizarre formatting. I fixed a few very quickly, but, for example: "Anon. (September 25, 2016). "Begotten & Shadow of the Vampire Double Feature with Director E. Elias Merhige in Person!". DO312.com. DO312.com. Retrieved July 15, 2017." The repetition really isn't needed! Josh Milburn ( talk) 20:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
J Milburn Thanks for the heads up. I did some looking over the sources and one of the websites I use as a source is down and was not archived and I do not know what to do about that.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 22:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- This is some of what I'm getting at. You may get some opposition based only on the source formatting, but I think you're going to get questions about the reliability of a lot of the sources you're citing. Just one example -- what is the Dennis Schwartz source? In fact, I think some of your formatting is going to lead people to question the reliability... Revolver is surely a perfectly reliable source when it comes to claims about Marilyn Manson's influences, but the formatting of the source -- Bennett, J (January 5, 2019). "Marilyn Manson's 'Antichrist Superstar': The Story Behind the Album Cover Art". RevolverMag.com. J. Bennett. Retrieved July 12, 2019. -- is a bit all over the place. I think it's going to be worth your while to sit down with this for an hour or two and try to tidy this all up. Josh Milburn ( talk) 20:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
J Milburn I went over the sources and removed the ones that had the listed issue. in terms of Author/Publisher issue, are you saying I should not do "Author first and last name" and just list them as the publisher when appropriate?-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 21:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- I am not. List the author as the author; the author is not (usually) the publisher. You don't need to include a publisher for periodicals (newspapers, magazines, academic journals, etc.) -- the periodical name is enough, especially if you can provide a wikilink. Meanwhile, there's no need to repeat the name of (say) a website as both the "work"/"website" and the "publisher". Josh Milburn ( talk) 17:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Okay, I think I understand what you mean now.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 18:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! |
|
Hello Paleface Jack, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
|
| |
| One year! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt Thanks!-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 18:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
In 2016 you tagged the Critical response section of The Gift (film) with {{ Expand section}}. [1] I've expanded it with several reviews and removed the tag. Please do take a look. Article could still do with some Production information though. -- 109.79.172.81 ( talk) 04:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amsterdamned, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Point of view.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy (Black Christmas), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unsolved murder.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Jack. Just a small favour, please. Could I ask you to comment out the project banners in User talk:Paleface Jack/Judge Holden (Revision) as they create invalid entries in their various maintenance categories. We use these to track project status. Thanks and all the best. No Great Shaker ( talk) 07:29, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.-- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! -- Jamie Tubers ( talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Thanks for uploading File:Billy, Black Christmas, 1974 film, screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Dee Richards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alias.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Paleface Jack: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ★Trekker ( talk) 18:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Possum (2018 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Jones.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
|
| |
| Two years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:31, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Possum (2018 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Possum (2018 film) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Gerald Waldo Luis --
Gerald Waldo Luis (
talk) 15:40, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hey there, just wondering if you're still able to respond to the review. I've purposefully left it on the non-prose so you can work it out bit by bit.
Gerald
WL 01:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @ Gerald Waldo Luis: Yeah just a little busy at the moment. Been sort of quietly editing the article. Will be able to do more edits during the weekend.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 05:01, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Possum (2018 film)
The article
Possum (2018 film) you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Possum (2018 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Gerald Waldo Luis --
Gerald Waldo Luis (
talk) 19:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Dee Richards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Newton.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
ım a fictional character pages lover too can you help me with /info/en/?search=Lawrence_Gordon_(character) page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Volkan1881 ( talk • contribs) 14:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
-
@Volkan1881 I will take a look at it as soon as I can. I currently working on a massive expansion project on a major/influential horror character at the moment so that has been pretty much occupying my time. But i will look over this character you have been doing.---17:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)~
Paleface Jack (
talk) 17:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- thank you so much Volkan1881 ( talk) 04:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Dear Paleface Jack I understand you like horror movies so much that's why I have a request for you for the article
horror film on its history section can you split the 2010s to present content into two decade contents to restore the 2010s content and the 2020s content that why they can match other decades like this.
1930s
1940s
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
2020s
These are what the decades are supposed to be on there can you restore 2010s and 2020s?
ScarfaceJohnny (
talk) 05:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
-
@ScarfaceJohnny Hey mate, sorry for the late reply. Unfortunately I am currently swamped working on a massive expansion project on a horror character so I will most likely be unable to look over that article for you. I agree that the article really needs some attention but I think it will be a lot more in depth than anyone thinks.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Please be aware that user:ScarfaceJohnny is a sockpuppet of a banned user "Jinnifer" who haunts the horror film article and
badgers other users into making her
WP:OR vandalisms and otherwise edit-warring on her behalf.--
Mr Fink (
talk) 20:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Apokryltaros had a feeling thanks though Paleface Jack ( talk) 23:32, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Please be aware that user:ScarfaceJohnny is a sockpuppet of a banned user "Jinnifer" who haunts the horror film article and
badgers other users into making her
WP:OR vandalisms and otherwise edit-warring on her behalf.--
Mr Fink (
talk) 20:39, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
hello paleface jack ım doing tf2 soldier page ı learned making character pages on wiki but ı still not know how ı found not copyrighted photo for pages can you give me a advice? Volkan1881 ( talk) 12:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
-
@Volkan1881 usually with things like that they are always gonna be copyrighted. I would look at other images from either similar video game characters on Wikipiedia and see how they do theirs. there is something you can look up in our help search that shows how to properly use copyrighted images as long as their fair use.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- thanks Volkan1881 ( talk) 15:47, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry I haven't been as active as I should be. I'm stretched pretty thinned. However, I am going to have to force myself to make time pretty soon in order to finish the Hellraiser reboot draft, because Hulu just announced that it's coming out in October (which puts me on a times table). I'll try to put some more work into the Leatherface draft when I get to work on that. Dark knight 2149 19:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Darkknight2149 thats fine mate. If memory serves me correctly you dont need to work on the reboot draft since there is an article already created. i have been working on the leatherface article a lot and have not gotten to the newer films just yet so take your time. I can try to pitch in on the hellraiser reboot if you like. Paleface Jack ( talk) 19:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2023! |
|
Hello Paleface Jack, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2023. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
★Trekker ( talk) 00:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
When you say "yet to get" do you mean you're waiting for the DVD that has this feature? Is that what you're wanting assistance with, or something else? I think you have enough to just move the information to the article and finish the article from there. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 15:27, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
-
@Bignole There is a dvd that has that info. I have not found it in stores as of yet. It seems like it would be a big point of critique would be the missing info on the Leatherface film. Call me a completionist, my goal is to get this up to FA. Also I have ideas for alternate images that are gonna be used for the main infobox.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:45, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- that and I am just trying to figure out if there are any sources that I can use that tell who did the design of the character in that film. Paleface Jack ( talk) 16:25, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- If I have time, I'll check my copy to see if they cover it. Is it under a specific feature? As for the article, you can move it without it going up for FA review. Here's the catch, if you completely revamp the article, you will be automatically denied at an FA review if you have just recently moved it into the mainspace. One of the things they are going to look at is public access for peer reviews. Jason Voorhees went through peer reviews and a GA review before ever seeing the FA review after I rewrote the page. It had other editors fine tuning in the mainspace for a bit of time.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 17:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
-
@Bignole yeah I kinda figured. FA status is the end goal cause of the significance of the character. Did you know and GA status will be goals once stuff gets transfered but FA is final goal. As for the information i think its in the "Man Behind the Bloody mask" featurette, I have the exact name of the featurette that might have the info in the userspace draft I have in the design subsection ("crafting the mask" as its called). Anyways thanks for the help and advice man, really stoked to finally reveal all this hard work to the outside world.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 17:10, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Just to be sure, which film in question are you looking at for this featurette? There is technically more than one film with "Leatherface" as the title.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 14:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Bignole yeah. It's the 2017 prequel. Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Just to be sure, which film in question are you looking at for this featurette? There is technically more than one film with "Leatherface" as the title.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 14:54, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
-
@Bignole yeah I kinda figured. FA status is the end goal cause of the significance of the character. Did you know and GA status will be goals once stuff gets transfered but FA is final goal. As for the information i think its in the "Man Behind the Bloody mask" featurette, I have the exact name of the featurette that might have the info in the userspace draft I have in the design subsection ("crafting the mask" as its called). Anyways thanks for the help and advice man, really stoked to finally reveal all this hard work to the outside world.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 17:10, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- If I have time, I'll check my copy to see if they cover it. Is it under a specific feature? As for the article, you can move it without it going up for FA review. Here's the catch, if you completely revamp the article, you will be automatically denied at an FA review if you have just recently moved it into the mainspace. One of the things they are going to look at is public access for peer reviews. Jason Voorhees went through peer reviews and a GA review before ever seeing the FA review after I rewrote the page. It had other editors fine tuning in the mainspace for a bit of time.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 17:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
If I get a chance, I'll try to view the bluray featurette this weekend for you. In the meantime, is the "cancer" stuff from the most recent movie? I don't recall him ever having cancer? The same with superhuman strength. He's strong, but not any stronger than the average person his size. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Bignole: The 2022 entry has no mention of cancer, as that was a part of the remake timeline. As for Superhuman strength, he does display this on several occasions from some entries in the franchise but I dont really explain or explore that cause it is irrelevant to the article atm. Anyways, rn I am not only fixing citations and whatnot but also trying to colorize a black and white image of the original character cause I cant seem to find a color version of the image and I really want it as the main image for the infobox. Thanks for the help mate!-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 21:52, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- He's shown to be strong, but not superhuman. If it isn't identified that way, then the category could not be appropriate. As for the other, I see Wikipedia mentions "tumors", but I only recall the films identifying it as a basic skin disease that ate away part of his face.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 21:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole he is shown superhuman strenth in 2 entries and in the remake series he is said to have skin cancer and is mentioned to have it.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- i can always find a reference for that Paleface Jack ( talk) 21:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole If you are referring to the main article space then ye that wouldnt mention the cancer or the strength. The article I am referencing is my
revision draft. Looking over some pieces of information there are a couple mentions of Leatherface having superhuman strength. I might include those in the draft then tranfer all the info to the main article.--
Paleface Jack (
talk) 22:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Who mentions this? It isn't stated in the films themselves. As for the cancer, I don't recall that and would have to watch the prequel again. I recall them mentioning a skin diseasae. Cancer would have killed him, as his family wouldn't have had money for treatment.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 15:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole they mention it in the first remake and ans is published in multiple sources, filmmakers also mention this in interviews. its skin cancer for starters, and its also a movie so...
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- As for superhuman strength, only the third film and the 2022 film versions display superhuman strength.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- What are you referencing with the superhuman strength?
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 21:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole for now CBR but I am gonna look for more sources
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- What are you referencing in the film itself? Someone's interpretation that because he's so strong it must be superhuman doesn't mean that it was superhuman. CBR says some stupid shit all the time. If you use a category for a film character that is based around characteristics, then they need to be things established in the official lore and not interpretations.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 21:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole yeah thats why I am lookin around.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- btw did you find anything in that special feature of leatherface (2017)? Paleface Jack ( talk) 22:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole yeah thats why I am lookin around.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:59, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- What are you referencing in the film itself? Someone's interpretation that because he's so strong it must be superhuman doesn't mean that it was superhuman. CBR says some stupid shit all the time. If you use a category for a film character that is based around characteristics, then they need to be things established in the official lore and not interpretations.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 21:55, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole for now CBR but I am gonna look for more sources
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- What are you referencing with the superhuman strength?
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 21:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- As for superhuman strength, only the third film and the 2022 film versions display superhuman strength.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole they mention it in the first remake and ans is published in multiple sources, filmmakers also mention this in interviews. its skin cancer for starters, and its also a movie so...
Paleface Jack (
talk) 15:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Who mentions this? It isn't stated in the films themselves. As for the cancer, I don't recall that and would have to watch the prequel again. I recall them mentioning a skin diseasae. Cancer would have killed him, as his family wouldn't have had money for treatment.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 15:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
-
@Bignole he is shown superhuman strenth in 2 entries and in the remake series he is said to have skin cancer and is mentioned to have it.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:31, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leatherface, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Myers, Jigsaw and Comico.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
|
| |
| Three years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:39, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks mate, much appreciated. Happy editing yourself, you deserve just as much appreciation as I!-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 18:10, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:The McPherson Tape (UFO Abduction) 1989 film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Lake Michigan Monster, 2018, release poster.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
Your GA nomination of Leatherface
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Leatherface you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Thebiguglyalien --
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 16:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Leatherface
The article
Leatherface you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:Leatherface for reasons why
the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Thebiguglyalien --
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 17:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I don't understand the "Quick Fail" and I've posted a note on the GA page to see what it's all about and for help in understanding how Leatherface meets criteria for it. I also still not sure why people suddenly dislike some of the section headers and how no one can actually provide direct guidelines on them having to be some basic title. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Bignole same. i mean I get some of the criticism to the length which is why I removed some things. But because of how complex leatherface is, it needs to be that length Paleface Jack ( talk) 21:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm about to go into a meeting, but I'll do a passover of the plot when I'm done. With the exception of the most recent film, I can go through the rest and trim them up. That should cut quite a bit of the length off. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Sounds good. you can always ask questions if need be.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 22:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I trimmed the plot outside of the new film. I'll try to go through it more when I have more time and look at the rest of the article. I was actually surprised that it has 3k more words than the Jason article. LOL.
BIGNOLE
(Contact me) 23:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Bignole well it took a year or more to do. that and the complexity of the character necessitated the length. Paleface Jack ( talk) 23:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think the complaint is that it isn't covering enough or that the character isn't complex, only that there's probably a lot of fluff within the writing. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 15:58, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, information that is best suited for individual film articles and whatnot.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 16:39, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- The best advice I could give you is to go join GA and FA reviews of articles you haven't worked on. Pay attention to the feedback given and requests for changes. While not all 100% is good feedback (i.e. subjective), you can learn a lot viewing from a neutral eye (i.e., you didn't contribute to the article and thus have no stake in the game).
- Next, go hang around the Guild of CopyEditors and the projects being worked on. You don't need to contribute, so much as you should see how they copyedit articles.
- As far as Leatherface goes. Re-read the article and if you read something that has nothing to do with Leatherface directly (e.g., discussion about changes to Erin in the novelization) then it should probably be removed. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:48, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Alright, sounds good. Will go back to that article a little later as I am working on creating one for a film.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 17:51, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Troika (1969 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Troika (1969 film) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vaticidalprophet --
Vaticidalprophet (
talk) 09:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Troika (1969 film)
The article
Troika (1969 film) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Troika (1969 film) and
Talk:Troika (1969 film)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vaticidalprophet --
Vaticidalprophet (
talk) 18:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Vaticidalprophet sounds good. I will get started on some edist tonight and the rest of the week. Paleface Jack ( talk) 18:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Troika (1969 film)
The article
Troika (1969 film) you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Troika (1969 film) for comments about the article, and
Talk:Troika (1969 film)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Vaticidalprophet --
Vaticidalprophet (
talk) 17:22, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Please, can you help me with that request? Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.180.136.168 ( talk) 09:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
-
@80.180.136.168 I will see what I can do when I have the time. The Japanese wikipiedia article has over 50 citations, though it's a matter of sifting through reliable ones.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 14:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you very much. I wait for good news. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
193.207.152.8 (
talk) 15:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- @193.207.152.8 unfortunately the article is really poorly written and undersourced.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Have read well? My request is to create those five pages related with that incident, translating them from Japanese to English, not a revision of the "Sankebetsu brown bear incident". I've already edit their red links there.
- @193.207.152.8 unfortunately the article is really poorly written and undersourced.
Paleface Jack (
talk) 21:08, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you very much. I wait for good news. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
193.207.152.8 (
talk) 15:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
I am fully aware of that request. It would not make sense to leave the main article it is based on in such a poor state. But the one film article I will take a look at.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 23:18, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, but don't forget those five pages when you'll have time. Thank you very much.
Many of his manga series are only in Japanese Wikipedia: ja:おらが村, ja:新・おらが村, ja:マタギ (漫画), ja:かつみ, ja:ニッポン博物誌, ja:ふるさと (漫画), ja:激濤 Magnitude 7.7. Can you translate them in English, and maybe also expand his own page and Fisherman Sanpei? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.2.62.220 ( talk) 10:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
- Can you do it? 79.16.244.59 ( talk) 10:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Please, can you help me with these translations from Japanese to English: Kotanbetsu ( ja:古丹別駅), Onishika ( ja:鬼鹿村), Brown Bear Storm ( ja:羆嵐), Japan Hunting Friends Association ( ja:大日本猟友会), Hokkaido Government Police Department ( ja:北海道庁警察部), Haboro Police Station ( ja:羽幌警察署), 28th Infantry Regiment (Japan) ( ja:歩兵第28連隊), Japan Action Enterprise ( ja:ジャパンアクションエンタープライズ), Kaoru Takagi ( ja:高木薫), Hokkaido Wine ( ja:北海道ワイン), Karasumaru family ( ja:烏丸家), Taisha Station ( ja:大社駅), Motoko Baba ( ja:馬場元子), Maiasa Shinbun ( ja:毎朝新聞), Champion Futoshi ( ja:チャンピオン太)? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.207.113.11 ( talk) 22:33, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Can you do it? 79.16.244.59 ( talk) 10:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
- Tarticles such as these are not my specialty so, unfortionately, no.-- Paleface Jack ( talk) 21:56, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Adapted from {{ Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page.
Hope to see a wonderful new year of great work from you on horror articles. ★Trekker ( talk) 13:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
|
| |
| Four years! |
|---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:27, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Paleface Jack ( talk) 20:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
| Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Varan you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grungaloo --
Grungaloo (
talk) 02:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
The article
Varan you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Varan and
Talk:Varan/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grungaloo --
Grungaloo (
talk) 16:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
The article
Varan you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Varan for comments about the article, and
Talk:Varan/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grungaloo --
Grungaloo (
talk) 00:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)