Godzilla Minus One is currently a Film good article nominee. Nominated by Eiga-Kevin2 ( talk) at 07:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: 2023 Japanese film by Takashi Yamazaki |
Godzilla Minus One received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Godzilla Minus One article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
Godzilla.com and other Japan-leaning sources are referring to the current 11/3/23 release as Godzilla’s 70th anniversary, probably due to the way Japan counts ages.
Is the wiki standard to default to a western understanding of ages/anniversaries where something starts at 0 instead of 1? 71.193.203.242 ( talk) 19:29, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Robot's official webpage for the film, along with this and this site credits Toho as 製作, which has been called "Presenter" by official English sources in the past (an example of this being Shin Ultraman). It appears English-language sites are erroneously crediting Toho as the producer of the film instead of Robot. Eiga-Kevin2 ( talk) 03:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Also claims the film is set in the same world as Shin Godzilla.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/robsalkowitz/2023/07/11/godzilla-spotted-approaching-america-toho-international-announces-new-creature-feature/ giftheck ( talk) 16:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
So I recently made an edit that was reverted and I believe it should be on the page. The edit was about the design of this Godzilla, but it does not seem to have a designated section. So I was wondering if we could make a section related to the design of this particular Godzilla. Thank you for your time!! 24.121.69.2 ( talk) 23:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Please note WP:FILMAUDIENCE and WP:UGC which state that user voted web polls are not reliable and should generally not be used in Wikipedia film articles in most cases. In this article the review aggregators ja:Filmarks and ja:Eiga.com both appear to be aggregators of only user votes (like IMDB votes, which are not allowed) not reputable film critics (unlike Metacritic or Allocine [fr], which are allowed). These kinds of user votes are not normally allowed, but sometimes exceptions are made when these types of scores are reported by other reputable sources or if there is a WP:LOCALCONSENSUS among editors. -- 109.76.135.251 ( talk) 15:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Can someone fact check the freon being used to aerate the water?
Then English dub states the freon creates a membrane around godzilla making it sink.
freon is also denser than water, so if you aerate the water with it the water itself becomes more bouyant.
I think the idea was to create a dense pocket that envelops godzilla and makes it sink, not to aerate the water and change the buoyancy? Lios959 ( talk) 12:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The assertment of universal critical acclaim seems like an editorializing overstatement. The many sources establishing critical acclaim do not support "universal". It seems like a case of citation overkill, and the phrase "Attributed to multiple references" seems confused.
I suggest making the sentence read "Godzilla Minus One has received critical acclaim", supported by one or two references. — St.Nerol ( talk, contribs) 00:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Reverted whatever happened here per MOS:ACCLAIMED and WP:EXCEPTIONAL. "A few" sources are not sufficient to support claims such as "critical acclaim". See also related discussions at Talk:The Dark Knight#"Attributed to multiple references" and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#"Attributed to multiple references", also started by this user. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 04:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
I noticed every other source I could find in Japan and overseas seems to say the film received critical acclaim and Shūkan Gendai (which I'm told isn't the most reliable Japanese source) is the only one saying Japan had a mixed response based on the comments of one critic they interviewed. Should we just go by this one source or stand by what everyone else is saying in this case? Eiga-Kevin2 ( talk) 21:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Japanese and Western aggregates have both collected an overwhelming majority of positive reviews as detailed under the sources. Two articles claiming otherwise are not considered reliable sources. I will be removing them. Bigbossbalrog ( talk) 01:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Currently there is no description of the contents of the film in the opening section. There should be a brief description of what the film is about. I haven't seen it, so I can't add it myself. Perhaps just say that it gives Godzilla's backstory or something, if that's what it did. Uchiha Itachi 25 ( talk) 08:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Godzilla Minus One is currently a Film good article nominee. Nominated by Eiga-Kevin2 ( talk) at 07:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: 2023 Japanese film by Takashi Yamazaki |
Godzilla Minus One received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Godzilla Minus One article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
Godzilla.com and other Japan-leaning sources are referring to the current 11/3/23 release as Godzilla’s 70th anniversary, probably due to the way Japan counts ages.
Is the wiki standard to default to a western understanding of ages/anniversaries where something starts at 0 instead of 1? 71.193.203.242 ( talk) 19:29, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Robot's official webpage for the film, along with this and this site credits Toho as 製作, which has been called "Presenter" by official English sources in the past (an example of this being Shin Ultraman). It appears English-language sites are erroneously crediting Toho as the producer of the film instead of Robot. Eiga-Kevin2 ( talk) 03:20, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Also claims the film is set in the same world as Shin Godzilla.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/robsalkowitz/2023/07/11/godzilla-spotted-approaching-america-toho-international-announces-new-creature-feature/ giftheck ( talk) 16:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
So I recently made an edit that was reverted and I believe it should be on the page. The edit was about the design of this Godzilla, but it does not seem to have a designated section. So I was wondering if we could make a section related to the design of this particular Godzilla. Thank you for your time!! 24.121.69.2 ( talk) 23:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Please note WP:FILMAUDIENCE and WP:UGC which state that user voted web polls are not reliable and should generally not be used in Wikipedia film articles in most cases. In this article the review aggregators ja:Filmarks and ja:Eiga.com both appear to be aggregators of only user votes (like IMDB votes, which are not allowed) not reputable film critics (unlike Metacritic or Allocine [fr], which are allowed). These kinds of user votes are not normally allowed, but sometimes exceptions are made when these types of scores are reported by other reputable sources or if there is a WP:LOCALCONSENSUS among editors. -- 109.76.135.251 ( talk) 15:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Can someone fact check the freon being used to aerate the water?
Then English dub states the freon creates a membrane around godzilla making it sink.
freon is also denser than water, so if you aerate the water with it the water itself becomes more bouyant.
I think the idea was to create a dense pocket that envelops godzilla and makes it sink, not to aerate the water and change the buoyancy? Lios959 ( talk) 12:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The assertment of universal critical acclaim seems like an editorializing overstatement. The many sources establishing critical acclaim do not support "universal". It seems like a case of citation overkill, and the phrase "Attributed to multiple references" seems confused.
I suggest making the sentence read "Godzilla Minus One has received critical acclaim", supported by one or two references. — St.Nerol ( talk, contribs) 00:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Reverted whatever happened here per MOS:ACCLAIMED and WP:EXCEPTIONAL. "A few" sources are not sufficient to support claims such as "critical acclaim". See also related discussions at Talk:The Dark Knight#"Attributed to multiple references" and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#"Attributed to multiple references", also started by this user. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 04:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
I noticed every other source I could find in Japan and overseas seems to say the film received critical acclaim and Shūkan Gendai (which I'm told isn't the most reliable Japanese source) is the only one saying Japan had a mixed response based on the comments of one critic they interviewed. Should we just go by this one source or stand by what everyone else is saying in this case? Eiga-Kevin2 ( talk) 21:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Japanese and Western aggregates have both collected an overwhelming majority of positive reviews as detailed under the sources. Two articles claiming otherwise are not considered reliable sources. I will be removing them. Bigbossbalrog ( talk) 01:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Currently there is no description of the contents of the film in the opening section. There should be a brief description of what the film is about. I haven't seen it, so I can't add it myself. Perhaps just say that it gives Godzilla's backstory or something, if that's what it did. Uchiha Itachi 25 ( talk) 08:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)