Note: This page pretty much covers all of 2018. There's stuff from most of 2016 and 2017 here, stuff from about July 2014 until mid-January 2016 here, and some even older stuff, from when I first started editing until about July 2014, here. But I often delete stuff from my talk, so none of these pages is complete.
I'm not ignore you i want to be agree Master Studio ( talk) 14:04, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm working on the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe page and I'm not sure why the content is being reverted to an outdated version. Yesterday, I added relevant footnotes and references and it has been reverted again. Please let me know how to proceed. Thank you. CIRad84 ( talk) 08:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Justlettersandnumbers, I've just edited "Fénix Awards" in order to rescue the page, maintaining part of your original information. I make the commitment to keep it updated. Following the Wikipedia advice, I'm letting you know this change, hoping that you won't mind and help me to improve the content of this page. Thank you. -- Lunaliu ( talk) 13:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
I wrote you because I thought, erroneously, that you were the creator of the page. My mistake. Anyway, neither do I copy the content of a page from another page. The information contained in Draft:Fénix Awards is all mine, as it's seen in the History of the page. It was I who put it in there and in Fénix Awards at the same time, because I thought that replacing the old draft was a previous requirement to make a new publication. In any case, the Draft:Fénix Awards is the one to repair, delete or reverse, not the other one. The work in Fénix Awards is new and original, not a copy-paste, (only from my sandbox, where it's still remaining), and has not a copyright violation. I'm not a relative with this stuff, only a fan who asked for some kind of help. It's for sure that the article may suffer from many issues but, as some user wrote: "it needs revision from a movie-spectacle expert". Sadly, again this article was "lost in translation", multiple mistakes, technicalities, and other obstacles that are placing it to a limbo, doing a small favor to casual readers, movie lovers, or general culture. The cry for help is still on the air for someone who has the faculties and the interest to serve and honor what should be the raison d'être of Wikipedia: accurate, reliable and verified information.-- Lunaliu ( talk) 21:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I saw you reverted my edit on Lombard Street (Baltimore). I placed the article in Category:Guardia Lombardi because, as it says in the article, the street is named after the town of Guardia Lombardi. I think this makes the article relevant to that category. Do you not agree? Ergo Sum 01:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Please attend to my request sir. THANK YOU Amosflash ( talk) 10:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
You seem to have reverted one of my edits...
...en route to deleting a pile of crap posted by a troll.
I approve. Narky Blert ( talk) 00:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. You requested a revdel for large parts of David Ostrowski a few weeks back per WP:COPYVIO. Lots of content has been readded to the article again, so I'm wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a peek to see if it's the same as the previously removed stuff. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 13:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. You requested a revdel for some parts of Baby Bootlegger. I tried to find the correct template for the article but could not find one, so I used what I found. I'm not a wikipedia expert but know about the topic of this page quite a lot. I will rewrite the article this week to remove the copyright violations. Thanks and sorry for the hassle. -- hki007 ( talk) 13:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. Thanks for your fast response and sorry for the similar copyright issues on both of the articles Baby Bootlegger and George Crouch I have recently written. I want to fix these problematic issues so that the accurate information remains. However, I remain somewhat confused with the Wikipedia policies, what is accepted and what is not. I know about the articles' substance but I'm not that much an expert when it comes to the Wikipedia process or technical details. Where could I find some layman intro to the Wikipedia policies, starting from very simple questions like "are cross-references inside Wikipedia good or bad?". As an example, I had a link in the George Crouch article to the APBA Gold Cup Wikipedia article, and after the latest revisions I notice that this cross-link has been removed. Is it a bad thing to refer to other Wikipedia articles? Is there something I can do to get the copyright violation notification removed from the George Crouch article? Big thanks. -- hki007 ( talk) 10:46, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. I'm a classic boat and historic ship aficionado. I wrote both the original Finnish wikipedia article https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/M/S_Wilhelm_Carpelan and the English article Finnish transport vessel Wilhelm Carpelan. The winter photo of the vessel in the Wikipedia articles is taken by me, I could see her for ten years from my office windows. I built the original Finnish article from information snippets from multiple sources, all in Finnish and Swedish, including printed military history magazines from the 1970s ( http://www.rannikonpuolustaja.fi/archive/1979_2.pdf) and early 2000s, and the obituary of the person who rebuilt the ship after the Finnish Navy decommissioned her. There's some later edits and additions to the pages by other Wikipedia contributors and I have not checked where all that information is coming from. I pretty much translated the English wikipedia article from my original Finnish article. One Finnish wikipedia editor did remove sections from my original wikipedia text saying that the information is not "relevant" which to me sounded a bit odd, especially now that I look at the sections that have been added by others, and tell about similar technical details of the vessel. -- hki007 ( talk) 17:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Please tell what one needs to do to get Wikipedia access to HighBeam and Newspapers.com? Thank you. -- Bbarmadillo ( talk) 20:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, JLAN - Kaldighi is back in the NPP queue. I saw where you redirected it back in Aug last year. Not seeing any improvement so I'm inclined to send it to Draft space until it's fixed. Your thoughts? Atsme 📞 📧 03:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm curious for your opinion on the Mariah Robertson page. Should only take about 2 seconds, specifically these unreferenced gallery exhibition lists. And of course she wants to add more, because these lists apparently aren't enough. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 18:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
You just reverted a set of edits I made to the Corriente article, because one of the three citations I added was to a magazine article that I wrote. I'm not clear on what was wrong with the citation. Generally speaking, a magazine article like that one is a perfectly valid Wikipedia cite. Is your issue that Acres U.S.A. doesn't have an archive of the article on their own website, or would it be a valid citation from someone else, but not from me? Thanks. Gary D Robson 20:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gary D Robson ( talk • contribs)
Hi. As requested by Robert McClenon I am notifying you that a Dispute resolution request has been raised for your edits to The National Memo article. Please share your point of view at the dispute's page. -- Bbarmadillo ( talk) 19:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: Hi, May I know why are you reverting my all edits from article Remy Blumenfeld. It takes two days for me to prepare the whole article with proper citations and formatting. And, It took only few seconds to revert the whole article. The article complies Wikipedia guidelines and all the information is verifiable. If you think my edits not complies Wikipedia rules, you are free to add maintenance tags or can resolve the issue as per WP:FIXIT. Also, I would request you to please refrain from reverting my edits. I am taking the issue to Wikipedia Helpdesk. If there is any problem in my edits, they will inform me. Thanks 223.189.17.142 ( talk) 09:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: Thank you for explaining reason. What you reverted that was my edit. As I am associated with the subject, I do declare my conflict of interest here. As you told the article does not meet the Wikipedia's neutrality guidelines. I'm again preparing it complying neutrality guidelines and would share it with you for approval. Do it need to register myself on Wikipedia to make further edits. As edit option is disabled now. 106.209.177.61 ( talk) 16:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: Hi, I have registered myself on Wikipedia. Can you please check my sandbox, I have reworked on the article, complying Wikipedia's policy. See /info/en/?search=User:MrDavies/sandbox. I have cited only reliable references, also have removed promotional wording as per Wikipedia:Neutrality. I would appreciate if you can do a favor and let me what more can be done. If you find any error or any kind of violation in article, please feel free to fix it. Thank you. -- MrDavies ( talk) 15:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Yes, As earlier I disclosed that I am associated with the subject and have WP:conflict of interest. I work for Blumenfeld, but not directly paid to edit the Wikipedia article. You can consider me paid, if Wikipedia policy says so. I do not have problem.
Also, Please let me know if current article violates any policy. Also would request you to accept the article if it meets for approval. Thanks-- MrDavies ( talk) 16:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
In the United States, 'liberal' has lost its original nineteenth-century meaning of referring to liberal democracy, partly because the original objective of liberal democracy has been considered achieved in the United States since the end of the eighteenth century. Liberal instead does mean either left-wing or progressive, and I mostly agree with Spintendo that left-wing and liberal are equivalent in context. In any case, it isn't worth volunteer editors spending a lot of time working to tweak the wording to provide a better advertisement for a paid editor. However, Spintendo is mostly correct in an American context, and that is the relevant context. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Would you care to let me know how the business deal between GNM and Fleet Street's Finest Ltd. be covered in this section without just deleting it. It seems to be acceptable to cover other means of income generation for the paper in the sub headed - "Membership" subscription scheme - and other business links to DigitalArchive for example. Is it just the outbound link that's an issue? Should it just go to the Guardian page? Best regards, Bret Painter ( talk) 23:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
I do appreciate the Reference changes, of which I did not know the correct way of adding them.
I am though upset of the major changes to my article without my notification or request. As I noted it was just my first published version being to a certain stranded but not my final. You watered it down to an absolute boring piece of pure information with more errors and inaccuracies than original noted. Taking out a lot of information that I had citations for. As Dury did very little teaching throughout his later career, as well with the incorrect version of emigrated and immigrated. As Dury did not leave the US to "emigrated" to the country. "emigrated" Is From, not to. (He immigrated to the US.) As well with removing his marriage which is the reason why he left Europe as well with the change in the caption of his self portrait. It is noted he's 18 on the back, therefor it is from 1835. As I am irritated to such major changes without just suggesting them privately. Of Which some are better, yes, but it still doesn't give you the grounds to change so much without my notice.
I do appreciate the References change, but it's even more inaccurate then before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin.P.L ( talk • contribs) 17:34, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Justlettersandnumbers I disagree completely, I see that as just a sad excuse... Articles are by people and are direct references of their work, they do not go out to the whole community but allow the community to improve errors or inaccuracies. Wikipida makes it clear that people's articles are their work. I could make the same claim to anything the you've made. It was ready, it was to a good stranded with correct information with nothing wrong with citation. Just because it was not to a layout of your approval does not mean it wasn't. Don't throw me in another forum for your own changes which I see are worse. The direct TN State Museum article I cited had the same information. Along with the citation from the white house itself on the first ladies portrait. (He Immigrated to The U.S. He did not Emigrate from the U.S, If you included that he did emigrate from Kingdom of Bavaria to the United States, that would work. But, that wasn't added.) Mr. Dury is one of the Finest artist from TN, doing portraits of presidents and kings, he is notable by Wikipedia's standards.. Not yours. (As there are articles on lesser figures even shorter and sadder than mine, so don't be unreasonable.)
The page comes under Wikipedia's Fictional characters portal. Kindly don't redirect, remove or try to delete the page. Instead help improving and expanding it. I am aman goyal ( talk) 18:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
At some XfD or other in the last month, I recall saying something like "This is just the same tendentious breed-moves pattern by someone making the same argument over and over again", about an objection you'd raised. In retrospect, that was cranky on my part, and hypocritical, since I'm as consistent as you are in the arguments I make about such things, and I was recently professing a desire for us to get along better. So, I'm sorry about that. I don't quite recall the context, but it was at the tail end of a lot of stressy stuff from various parties all day long, and I took it out on whoever was handy. I vented in a similar way in the direction of Pigsonthewing around the same time span. Kind of a more-than-momentary loss of temper. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 07:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the refs at George Dury I just couldn't figure out what was going on there! Theroadislong ( talk) 22:11, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
I'll be Glad to explain myself for the concerns you brought up.
I hadn't changed the References yet because I was in the process of adding more, especially for the "Other Notable Subjects" section. Like I noted, if people were Interested they could find them all on the Tennessee Portrait Project's website with little difficulty, while I was in the processes of adding the rest.
As well Explaining that Dury was a Tennessean and spent a longer art career in the state of TN rather then Europe. (That he was primarily a State painter rather than a national.) I was in the process of coming up with a better sentence then putting a State and Nation together.
Dury's Marriage is the reason he leaves Europe for the US. I understand it not being a strong Citation, But it's something simple that shows they were married, as "Mount Olivet Cemetery" has it cited being the Same George Dury.
If you read the Full citation from the "Memorials of Sarah Childress Polk" you would have noticed that the President and First lady paid for their official portraits out of Pocket when leaving the White House in 1849. (Allowing them to bring them Home to Nashville with them.) President Polk would not have a portrait in the White House till the Buchanan Administration, While Sarah till the Arthur administration. Dury Was commissioned by the Ladies Association of Nashville to copy Mrs Polk's official Portrait(GPA Healy's) the one she owned for the white house. As Sarah's White House Portrait is the copy by George Dury, not the the GPA Healy. (You can see the GPA Healy's at Polk's presidential museum.) As For Sarah's other Portrait it was a widowers portrait with no relation to the White House commission, that's why I left it out.( http://tnportraits.org/polk-sarah-childress-dury-1878.htm)
I'll be glad to Fix these problems in just a short Time, Including the References which I know are a mess. (So Excuse them for just the time being.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin.P.L ( talk • contribs) 02:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ida Kar by Mark Gerson, 1974, grayscale, cropped.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 23:55, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear Justlettersandnumbers,
I was wondering if you could help me out with the Artist biography of: AIX1 And i was also wondering if you could help me with the biography of Recordlabel: Akhadir Recordings Amsterdam Wiki Link AIX1: /info/en/?search=AIX1 Wiki Link Akhadir Recordings Amsterdam: /info/en/?search=Akhadir_Recordings_Amsterdam
These pages are not for commercial purpose endings but for independence for both the artist and the record label
Thanks for your Time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akesc ( talk • contribs) 12:27, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
How is indicating the influence that a church has over a school promotion? People are free to decide for themselves whether they want to choose that school, but they have a right to know who's influential in running it. I note that there are as many editors who categorize themselves as atheists and agnostics in Wikipedia as Catholics and Christians, so I have no fear that a religion-friendly thrust will impose itself in Wikipedia. Jzsj ( talk) 14:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. First, a small technical issue: the talk page of List of Americans by net worth wrongly redirects to Talk:List of members of the Forbes 400. Could you please change that? Secondly, how do you suggest that names be added to that list without copyright controversies? The fact that Forbes lists in their entirety are found on Wikipedia - for years now and with virtually no opposition - should be taken into consideration. Regards, Yambaram ( talk) 23:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
I fixed the first issue so you can disregard it... I'd also like to hear your opinion on whether the Richest american/ s redirects should redirect to 1) List of Americans by net worth, or 2) List of richest Americans in history (the latter is the current state). Yambaram ( talk) 00:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Please accept my late apologies for being rude and obnoxious during The National Memo discussion. You were right and I was wrong. Having 140% of my contribution deleted got me a bit off the track - this should never be the case again. Thank you for being patient and tolerant all the way through. I learned a lot about the concept of notability and depth of coverage from this discussion. -- Bbarmadillo ( talk) 17:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Nikkimaria ( talk) 23:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi justlettersandnumbers, I wanted to reach out to you and ask for your assistance on improving the Dr. Paolo Casali page. If I can offer assistance on helping the page be neutral and utilize Encyclopedic content, please let me know. I am not a paid editor and have no intention of making unwanted changes on this page. The COI was disclosed on the talk page as well. Again, any input from you will help enhance the page and make sure it is written with a neutral point of view. Burles104 ( talk) 16:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Burles104
I wasn't aware until you said something that a company with actual newspaper articles on its web site might be violating copyright. I went back to the web site a few years after using those as sources and they weren't there, but that was because an editor with a COI wanted to improve the article and I was helping him. I had to find the articles the proper way at that point.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
I've mentioned you at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Eyes_on_editor_Rusboot over our seemingly mutual concerns about User:Rusboot. Hope this is ok.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 01:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers! I would like to ask you for some advice. Recently, I have contributed for the page Natives (Éditions), but it was deleted. Maybe, Natives Éditions is not a huge company, but it is a very serious publisher and a really original music label. Do you think it is possible to do something in order to restore this page? I don't have now any access to its content on Wikipedia, the only link I could find is here: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Natives_(Éditions)
Thank you in advance for your advice! 1996Paris ( talk) 12:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
~ Amory ( u • t • c) 17:32, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
I see now ... I should have looked under Recent listings. Sorry for the extra work! And thanks. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 20:27, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, justlettersandnumbers, I have given you the only ticket number that I have. I can not confirm what you write, "that a copyright violation was found". On the contrary: no violation was found. A substantial contribution was deleted unjustified. Even if it was deleted unjustified, you write, 'it would not mean that the content will necessarily be restored to the article'. I am surprised that the administrative procedure does not respect contributions untill they are proven to be incorrect, imprecise or in any way improper. After all, we donate time, effort and money. (April 1, 2018)
Best regards, Pauline van de Ven Vandevenp ( talk) 00:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I've reverted one of your edits by adding back the background section in the Bojana Sentaler entry (your comment mentioned it was deleted due to a lack of references). The references were already listed in the previous paragraphs but I've now added them directly to the background section text so it's more clear. Thanks Abonzz ( talk) 14:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Battle of Poison Spring appears to be pretty much a straight copy-paste from here. You're my copyright-problem-go-to-person (aren't you thrilled?). Ealdgyth - Talk 11:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Good morning Justlettersandnumbers, With regards to the /info/en/?search=SillaJen page SillaJen, I have deleted the parts that contain the copyright information. Also, I have requested the company to give permission to use the material that they have published through the newsletter and their website and they sent me an email approving it. It appears that "An email has been received by the OTRS Team." I was wondering if you could review the issue and resolve the current Copyvio message. Thank you for your kind consideration and support :) Best, Oncolytics101 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oncolytics101 ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Dear 'Justlettersandnumbers'. In february, you deleted and blocked a large and rather valuable contribution to 'digital painting' that I made over a long time, because of an unfounded copyright issue. You were checking he matter with the help of the ticket number that I gave you. As you can see, the lemma now only offers very limited information, partly inaccurate, and certainly not without commercial influence. What did you find out about the assumed 'copyright infringement'? Please let me know how we proceed. Kind regards, Pauline van de Ven (26/4/2018). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vandevenp ( talk • contribs) 09:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I made a section in the Transportation about walking and biking in Florence, and was wondering why it was removed? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katieadeclue ( talk • contribs) 18:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
I do not know what is your role in deciding this matter but since you removed the comments last time around thus I am reaching out to you to request that this matter be decided with urgency before the discussion gets out of hand again. I have been trying to avoid commenting there since you removed the comments but it is hard to keep oneself at bay seeing the gross distortion of facts and personal attacks by OP. OP has provided the evidence and NadirAli has responded, there is no place for the last comment by OP. I request you to please remove that comment. Also, please know that this report has nothing to do with copyvios, this is all about the content disputes between OP and NadirAli. OP has no pain in his heart for copyvio rather their heartache is different, it is all about getting an opponent blocked to tilt the consensus building process on multiple pages. OP's grudge against NadirAli is shown in below diffs.
Capitals00 Feud with NadirAli
[5], [6], Deceptive edit summary when reverting the WP:STATUSQUO restored by NadirAli. After that Capitals00 goes on the talkpage to make WP:PERSONALATTACK (the one in number 2), [7], [8] Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 01:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse (3rd nomination). Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 10:52, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello mate. I was noticed that you eliminate the contribution I added in this article because I did not put citations to contrast the information. If is possible, I want to recover the article in order to indicate the site I searched the history of this association. Thanks for paying attention.
Irene Christian Manu Silvia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irene Christian Silvia Manu ( talk • contribs) 13:40, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
I was pointed to this page I was pointed to this page /info/en/?search=Vladimir_Krulj and I think the infobox is wrong and done for promotional purposes as most of the other information. Can you please fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.27.229.242 ( talk) 08:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
We are student of Aerospace engineering and we know a lot about this topic. Moreover, you could watch the information that I have put if you enter in EASA official web page.
Thank you for your contributions but I have to say that our information is not invented.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Irene Christian Silvia Manu ( talk • contribs) 19:22, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Just for your information, see this on my talk page:
"Fram, it's my idea to correct all past violations if I found them or I'm notified, and as I said, it's my idea not to "copy and paste" from sources in the future, even if they are in PD or CC0; therefore if I do not find a PAST violation, and I'm notified and allowed to correct it, and this does not count as new problems ("old violations which are only found after the unblock obviously don't count as new problems"), I understand than this is the last chance unblock. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Elisa.rolle&oldid=830041401)
The violation for Dorothy Caruso was in August 2017. As I said if I was notified I would have taken care of it (as I did). Moreover, as you can currently see on my talk page, I'm "semi-retired", I do not contributed anymore new content on Wikipedia, and I'm only correcting things as I found them (or I'm notified). KR, Elisa.rolle ( talk) 19:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Please respond to my response: User_talk:Dream_Focus#Puzzle_Puppers_moved_to_draftspace Dream Focus 11:49, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, amongst other edits you deleted the list of all extracurricular activities apart from sport, but made no reference to this in your edit notes. What is the thinking here? Rhanbury ( talk) 16:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I did read the edit summary. Throughout the rest of the article you have added the cn tag on unreferenced material, except in this one case where you deleted the sentence instead. I am trying to understand why the difference in treatment. I am not particularly attached to the sentence, which long predates my involvement, although there does need to be more than sports under the extracurricular heading so I shall seek out some references. On the COI point I have put full details on the talk page and would ask you to remove the COI tag at the top if you are satisfied. Thanks. Rhanbury ( talk) 07:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Zircon 2 ( talk) 16:25, 21 June 2018 (UTC) Justlettersandnumbers, thanks very much for taking the time to review the recent Geology of Uganda article! If you would like to consolidate the references to the Thomas Schluter Atlas of African Geology, that would be excellent. I am a comparative newcomer to Wikipedia, and I appreciate all the people who have reviewed the recent launch of geology of Africa articles. A technical question you may understand better than I do. From a category or SEO perspective, is there a reason why none of the African country geology articles are showing up in general search engine searches?
At Post-presidency of George Washington for lifted text and close paraphrase. I removed some and revdel and then did a second scan, and I suspect it has more close paraphrase and copying that I don't have the time this week to get to it and I don't want to send an article on a significant historical figure to CP unless absolutely necessary. If you don't have time, that's fine, but thought I'd reach out as you're great at this type of thing. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply on Talk:Paolo Casali. I left follow up questions and comments. Thanks again. -- Meriville ( talk) 03:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! You changed the entry for Töfrahöllin into a redirect to the entry for the author. I'm not sure why: the entry cited two reviews, which demonstrates that it is notable. Your edit summary mentioned that there were no citations, but we shouldn't expect citations in summaries. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it was a great entry, and lots more could be done with it, but maybe it would be more appropriate to mark it as a stub than remove it? I'd be interested to hear what you think. Thanks! Alarichall ( talk) 21:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi J-lan. I think you meant to say the content was copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20080731210843/http://www.toll.com.au:80/about.html and was added with this diff? Could you please fix the necessary pages (article, WP:CP entry, and user talk)? I would do it myself but I don't want to make assumptions about what you were trying to say. Thank you, — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 17:34, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Due diligence fail on my part... sorry... pours ashes on head -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 07:46, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
—SerialNumber54129 paranoia / cheap sh*t room 14:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
Since when do football stubs need more than two references that directly reference everything that's written on the stub itself? Maybe I'm still living in the past, when it was still acceptable. You put two of my articles into draftspace though, when 4 similar articles were reviewed. If you look across Wikipedia, you'll see hundreds, no - thousands of such articles with no fuss about them. -- Janisterzaj ( talk) 15:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | |
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 22:38, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your explanation on my Talk page. However, I'm confused about where to proceed with my work on the article. You provided a link [9] to create a temp, but the Draft:Richard_Moya is still out there, and it contains my work with its revision history. I would prefer to keep working at the original at the draft location, so the revision history is not lost. Can you somehow undo your mistake there? Mbcoats ( talk) 20:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
My article has been published as Richard A. Moya. Thanks for you help. Mbcoats ( talk) 18:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers I could use some advice. What do you make of List of artworks by John Middleton, given that you've created List of works by Giambattista Pittoni? I think it goes against guidance at WP:CSC. What's your view? Thanks, Vexations ( talk) 21:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Forgot to let you know, but sent you an email a few days ago. No need to reply if there's no need, just forgot to mention. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 12:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I saw that on July 9, you reverted the Marc J. Lane page to a previous version because of a paid editing violation. However, I have since updated my user page to fully disclose who I work for in accordance with Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, but please let me know if there is anything else I may be missing. Otherwise, please undo the revert as some of the information in this previous version is no longer accurate. Thanks so much. Mannpark ( talk) 15:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
FYI for when you return... Our old friend is back. See this "new" user and especially the global contributions. If not already there, put Carlo Bazzi, Ezio Moioli, and Ladislao de Gauss on watch. He also seems to be editing James Rivière (again) both here and cross-wiki as the IP 151.38.20.48. I'll be away in Italy August 2–September 3, but will check in once in a while. Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 06:45, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Sir, you moved an article related to Gadhawa Rural Municipality in draft because of publishing without references. I was quite busy while creating that article at that time.Now, I have mentioned reliable sources and references of contents on that draft.Would you mind to publish that draft? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharad87 ( talk • contribs) 16:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
I feel like the Sirens article you flagged for deletion is notable. Maybe you can add to the article? Plus look at my new signature — ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 21:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Surreal Barnstar |
You are a jerk ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 22:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC) |
Sir, Gadhawa rural municipality and koilabas are different regions. This rural municipality has been established since last two years by federal government of Nepal. I am a resident of Gadhawa Rural Municipality ward number 1. So,I would like to request you to publish Gadhawa Rural Municipality article.Many VDCs, including Gobardiya VDC has been merged to form Gadhawa Rural Municipality. Sincerely, Sharad87— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharad87 ( talk • contribs) 11:43, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
At least check the sources you're deleting before you blank an entire page. The archive source clearly stated "Usage Public Domain / creative commons & uncopyrighted" Just the fact that we have on Wikimedia a copy of the entire song should be evidence enough, but if it's not, then it's reinforced by how the sources very clearly stated that it's public domain. I don't think you're acting in bad faith, but I do think you're acting foolish. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 18:09, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
I work for Meetoo the organisation and created the article that you said is copyrighted via this wikipedia page /info/en/?search=Draft:Meetoo
How can I show you the evidence? I can change show you that I can login to that page and show you? That is also my author section https://www.meetoo.com/blog/2017/meetoo-a-brief-history.
Here is another one of my blogs on this website: https://www.meetoo.com/blog/2018/3-reasons-you-must-try-a-student-response-system-this-year
I also declared that I work for the company and that this page is completely taken from other independent sources and references. I am not sure why this is becoming such a challenge?
Many thanks, Ben.
I am undoing all of your redirects. You pissed me off. Thanks for ruining my birthday. Make sure to think about my feelings, as well as the fact that I am bisexual.
Plus, if Sirens can’t have a page, why can’t The shape of my heart song by nas have one?
ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 19:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, this was the first draft I moved to mainspace after being accepted at AfC earlier today and I noticed you tagged it with a few issues pretty quickly once I had moved it. It seemed like the subject would pass an AfD based on some searching, so I'm just checking to see if you thought I was too hasty with accepting it, just to ensure I'm on the right track? SportingFlyer talk 11:49, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Why do you have to assume that people who edit a webpage have a relation with the subject? So people cannot edit their favourite soccer players? or musicians?
I welcome your input on American Bucking Bull. Atsme 📞 📧 21:14, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
I've revdel'd the IP's edit; I think that is the one you were concerned was a copyvio. Let me know if this is not the case. Mjroots ( talk) 20:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Just a little recreational reading for you and Scope creep: Talk:Rodney Lough Jr.. Enjoy! -- Hoary ( talk) 23:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. I'm new to Wikipedia and still getting familiar with things. You flagged some updates made to Cabbagetown, Toronto that I made. Cabbagetown HCD Committee is a group that I am part of. My name is noted on the groups website. The page Cabbagetown, Toronto was updated with original content from our committee. Other revisions to some incorrect information was also amended on the page. If the changes haven't already been sourced, the content has been affirmed. I'm still trying to figure out how to reference my sources. My apologies if I missed something. I will ensure that updates and changes conform with the policies and guidelines of the Wikipedia community before edits are saved. If there is anything I can provide or assist with, please let me know. Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia. StudioLAND ( talk) 23:56, 17 August 2018 (UTC) |
Thank you for your prompt input into this page. I have just posted only the first two sentences and the discography as the content is not found at https://sydneyeisteddfod.com.au/articles/margaret-baker-genovesi/. I hope this will be an acceptable start. Spt.08 ( talk) 13:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Sorry again for the extra work. I had been granted use of the content and that image by the creator of the text and owner of the image for use (so it was not personally contentious) but was unaware it was from a printed article. I can definitely see the complexities for Wiki for any textual similarities. This is not a criticism of your actions or the policy of Wiki at all but I do wonder about the challenges of being able to present comprehensive biographical information re classical performers as
To this end, I have been reading through a number of biographies of this sort, especially of living artists, and a lot of the material is presented in a somewhat stilted manner and I wonder if this is as a result of the constraints for entirely original content. To me, this impoverishes the content somewhat viz: /info/en/?search=Taryn_Fiebig; /info/en/?search=No%C3%ABmi_Nadelmann; /info/en/?search=Susan_GrahamAnyhow thanks again Spt.08 ( talk) 20:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC) Hi again - did I do the wrong thing by posting the revised draft on your talk page? Thanks Spt.08 ( talk) 11:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I just wanted to let you know that I am not being paid by Jeff to edit his wikipedia page. He is a friend and I have been helping him with this. We took directly from his autobiography because it's comprehensive. Working with him to create an edited version of his autobio that's not self-aggrandizing, but just verifiable facts. Alaks Hovel 23:22, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Well there were several links to external sources corroborating the claims before the entirety biography was deleted, so. Alaks Hovel 15:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alakshovel ( talk • contribs)
You are an ignorant bully, who tires to impose his own understanding of the term "promotion"! Your actions are very alarming and are to be brought to the attention of the wiki community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avhahn ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Can the link be added under a new section "External Links"? The source is referenced in numerous articles (reliable or not) and is often the only source. I understand that the pages there have not been tended to or updated in years, however some information is still pertinent and may support other sources. Refiner ( talk) 15:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi
I have rewritten the Alex Sloley article in my own words. There should be no copyright issues now. I have put in the correct place as a temp sub page.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Disappearance_of_Alex_Sloley/Temp
I understand that I have to ask you to replace the old article with the revised one?
Nacentaeons ( talk) 17:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
In this edit, you said "oh, please, this is a UK English page, 'meet' is an ordinary transitive verb". In the US, if someone "meets" students, it means she's introduced to them, and that may be the entirety of the interaction, whereas if she "meets with" them, she spends time in a meeting with them. Is that different in UK English? MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 21:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
You have removed an edit that I made on the UAL page regarding the partnership schemes that they offer through several colleges outside London e.g. Buckinghamshire College Group. Please advise why you have removed this as the edit was correct; my daughter has completed and received her certificate for a UAL qualification there last year, and is enrolled for an extended version of her UAL Diploma for this coming academic year. Wordsworthnothing ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
~ Amory ( u • t • c) 12:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm fairly new to editing so please forgive my trail-and-error approach. I wrote the article on Jon Jashni. I've cited my conflict of interest as I am associated with the company he runs. I feel I have kept the article neutral in tone, though I'm unsure how to request a cleanup if one is required. So that I may improve the article, might you give me an example of what further secondary sources are needed to meet the notability criteria for creative professionals? Based on what I have learned on Wikipedia:Notability (people) I feel this article cites numerous reliable sources that are independent of the subject, in addition to citing the significant role he played in his body of work. And his membership with the AMPAS, AFI, and PGA certainly denotes he is an important figure in his professional field. Please let me know how I might improve this article. -- Xxxx7291 ( talk) 05:38, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Xxxx7291
Hi, I wasn't able find the copyvio quote you noted in the link you provided in the tag. Can you confirm the link is correct? Thanks - wolf 16:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
You added the notability tag to John Treviño Jr. recently. This page is under construction, as mentioned in the comments, 'Initial Stub'. Given how long ago the subject lived, online information is limited. In my opinion he is notable and I will continue to develop material to flesh out the article. Mbcoats ( talk) 02:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Moving above comment to John Trevino Jr. talk page.... Mbcoats ( talk) 01:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you don't mind me reverted the deletions for BAME Labour and Mike Grindley. I'll work on rewriting them over the weekend hopefully, if that's OK. RevertBob ( talk) 07:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. I wonder could you update me? Many thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 10:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Martinevans123, it's not actually obligatory to upload freely-licensed files to Commons rather than here, it's just where they should be; nor does it actually have to be the copyright holder who performs the upload, though that is usually the person who has the original version of the file with the EXIF data intact. This molehill has already developed into a decent-sized hill, so do please proceed however seems easiest to you, and someone will probably run around and fix it afterwards if necessary. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 10:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
I removed the COI template from Jon Jashni because 'X' has made a PAID disclosure on the Talk page. Left the notability template in place. Shortened the article. David notMD ( talk) 12:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. thanks for reverting my changes on the above article citing WP:COI. I'm a member of the Institution - trying to do research on the organisation in an attempt to one day pass the excruciating examination for full entry. Thought I'd update the wikipedia which is poorly formatted and woefully out of date - and lacking information - so that people in the future would have some sort of idea regarding the history. The Institution is a charity - and I'm not the owner or trustee of said charity.
Any indication as to what sort of Conflict of Interest I may have exactly, and how you came to that conclusion? Hakini ( talk) 22:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I am a little confused as to your action on Cautious Clay, of which there is now one version in the draft space. There had been two versions, in article space and in draft space, both with tags about possible conflict of interest editing. I had changed the draft into a redirect to the article. You reverted my edit, with a comment that there had been a copy-and-paste move. This leaves the version in draft space standing. You then converted the article into a redirect back to the draft. This leaves article space redirecting back to the draft. First, I see that the article was created as a copy of the draft, which strips attribution and so is technically plagiarism of the copyleft on the copied article. I hadn't understood what is meant by a copy-and-paste move, although I knew that it was not a good idea; now I know what it is. But, first, was the article draftified because it was improperly created? Second, there is now a redirect from article space into draft space. I thought that redirects from article space to draft space were not appropriate and were supposed to go R2. Is there a reason why there is now a redirect from article space to draft space, or is that a mistake? Also, what should I do in the future if I determine that both a draft and an article exist, but the article is a copy of the draft? Is there a way to report copy-and-paste moves? Robert McClenon ( talk) 19:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
You said that you would look at this situation when it came up. At least I think that is what you said.
I accepted Draft: Youngjae (South Korean singer), after moving the previous redirect entry, which was a redirect to Got7, to Youngjae (South Korean singer) (old version). The new draft is now the article. The problem is that the redirect now contains some history. Normally I would just have the redirect tagged for G6 deletion as housekeeping. Should I have this old version deleted, or does it need a history merge or what? Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, so I have added several reliable third-party sources pointing to Jeff Hunt as the founder of the Table of the Elements label. Can we move along with submitting this for review?
/info/en/?search=Draft:Jeff_Hunt_(music_producer)
Thank you! Alaks Hovel 14:36, 14 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alakshovel ( talk • contribs)
It seems like there is some asymmetrical moderation going on here. Did I do something particular to upset you guys? I've seen entire articles of people that rely on a single article (i.e. /info/en/?search=David_Haggerty_(tennis)) but were processed as submissions, even though labeled as a Stub. What exactly in the article do you think people will have substantial problem with? This biography? Because the biography at this time only states "Jeff Hunt is the owner and a co-founder of the label Table of the Elements, described by Pitchfork Media as "a national treasure."" both of which are claims easily corroborated by the seven sources listed as reference. Is it the discography that's causing the issue? I want to get to the bottom of this before I press "submit" because I'm not quite sure what the major issue is exactly, and I want to address it. Alaks Hovel 14:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Some red links to put on watch... Under the guise of the IPs 151.68.12.69 and 151.20.21.172, he has been busy creating numerous articles on numerous WPs on a chap called Gabriel Grego and sometimes Gabriele Grego. See here for more. There's a particularly fanciful one on the Esperanto WP [10]. Grego's apparently one of the partners of the now-deleted Quintessential Capital Management. I imagine what interests our friend is Grego's side interest in kickboxing and mixed martial arts. Meanwhile a new account, Saver68 has been merrily uploading loads of images of Carlo Biotti. Another new account QCM100 has been busily uploading images of Grego to Commons as "own work" which they clearly are not. There's another new account at Commons SandraPol23, who takes an uncommon interest in the ...er... Biotti's and Polli's. Also pinging AttoRenato. Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 15:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Let me know when you read it! ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 01:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
...but I need your copyvio expertise regarding what steps to take for this issue. I'd really rather turn it over to you as I suck at being an OP at noticeboards, so if you would be so kind as to take a look at this issue (which led to many more) it would be much appreciated. My original question was on the TP of Moonriddengirl who is currently very busy in RL. I saw that Amory posted on MRG's page, so that's where I went hoping to get the issue resolved. I can't figure out how the subject article was promoted to GA, much less passed GNG, and that doesn't count all the other copyvio issues involving that same editor, so I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed by it all. Atsme ✍🏻 📧 22:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
{{subst:copyvio|url= source(s) }}
(that generates instructions, and code to be left on the listing for the day and on the user's talk-page). I'll try to take a look tomorrow. 'Night,
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk)
23:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Here you replaced {{ snd}} with a raw spaced n-dash. Do you have any particular reason for disliking the template? The dangers of writing it literally as you probably know are (a) an possible line break before the ndash (admittedly would need an unusually narrow window in this case) (b) subsequent editors unable to see easily, in monospace, whether it's a dash or hyphen so have to take extra time to check, which I tend to do a lot. And of course " – " is even uglier. David Brooks ( talk) 19:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
I am making a new article, and can you help (I.e. by adding sources and details) me? The article is about Vengeance by Denzel Curry. The video DID recently drop. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 19:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Justlettersandnumbers. Do you intend to indefinitely block me for copyright violation? This is an obvious question in my mind and I think the best thing is just to ask it directly. Will it happen? I'm trying to cooperate on my talk page, only if you definitely do intend to block me and have made up your mind about this, that doesn't encourage me to continue. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 01:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Just to let You know I give You support for the RFA nomination. Looking at Your edit history, I think You make a good candidate. Eddie ( talk) 21:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Palazzo Pesaro Orfei at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
21:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
TheSandDoctor Talk 16:56, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
On 1 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Palazzo Pesaro Orfei, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the designer Mariano Fortuny established his studio in the Palazzo Pesaro Orfei in Venice, he was one of about 350 people using the building? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Palazzo Pesaro Orfei. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Palazzo Pesaro Orfei), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
(Early) congrats on its passing! 99% - an impressive feat. That means unless 29% or more change to oppose within 3 hours (highly unlikely
![]() ![]() |
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the Administrators' guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to get in touch on my talk page. WJBscribe (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful RFA! It's your turn to hear the words of wisdom I received from Katie after my RFA passed: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Congratulations on your highly successful RfA! We all know you'll be good with the mop! Semi Hypercube ✎ 00:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC) |
Yes, very well done, JLAN. Look..... I have dispensed with the usual rainbow-clad unicorns, boxes of kittens, strong beer and chocolate cakes, And I've gone for "just lettuce and Humbers"!! Enjoy! lolness Martinevans123 ( talk) 12:35, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
... to anyone and everyone who took part in this, whether with questions, corrections, support, advice or criticism. Thank you all for the trust and confidence you have – collectively – placed in me! Now I just need to live up to it ...
I most particularly want to thank MRG, Amory and Alex for their steady support, wise guidance ... and patience. Thank you so much! Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 16:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Congratulations on your RfA - take it slow, and ask for help if you're ever unsure. Good luck!
![]() |
Congratulations on your successful RfA. I hope you will wield the mop with care and that you will take to heart the concerns that were raised there about your tone and approach to new editors. I think you know that you may be the first voice that some people hear on wikipedia. Although policy is clear, it can be applied with a carrot and kind guidance as opposed to a bat. Sometimes the cluebat is needed, but now that you have some very powerful tools at your command, you need to be slow and cautious in their use. ( "With great power comes great responsibility".) I urge you to think about the interactions that you and I had in your early years here, where, sad to say, the tone of our respective written words led each of us to almost precisely the same (wrong) conclusions about the other. We desperately need to nurture content editors. Most people who make mistakes — including you and I — can learn and grow from them. Good luck. Montanabw (talk) 17:51, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
...on your RfA, you had a very impressive turn-out. I'm glad it didn't turn into a train-wreck like so many have as of late. But anyway, good luck to you with your new duties. Cheers - wolf (#61) 15:11, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
I've reverted this edit (and the two that followed) as they appeared to copy word-for-word from the cite linked. I'm not really familiar with copyvio policy, so what should happen next? A report somewhere? Rev/del? Something else? Thanks - wolf 15:26, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
I think I figured out what you meant by fixing the lack of attribution for the List of Fairy Tail Zero episodes, but I need confirmation. Is putting a {{ Copied}} template with the proper ID's at the top of each talk page for the list and Fairy Tail Zero all I have to do? I also don't understand what you mean by "our license". User:SubZeroSilver ( talk) 00:29, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Alec Smithson. Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 08:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Remember this Natoli? Well, his alleged son Amedeo died on the Simple, Italian, German, and French Wikipedias, but has risen from the dead on the Danish one where he is preposterously described (in apparently execrable Danish) as "having revolutionized the insurance and insurance reinsurance industry and defined the structure of modern philanthropy" and "having become the world's richest man and the first billionaire in US dollars and often considered the richest person in history". Not only that, according to Wikidata he was a practicioner of boxing and savate. Meanwhile I've now taken the Commons SPI findings to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems for blocking and tagging. We'll see what happens. So far no response. Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 12:59, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Justlettersandnumbers, I received the notice from you that edits to the Rex Ray have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material. I am the copyright holder for items that require a copyright ie photo, publishing attributions and authorship content. How is it that you remove these edits without knowing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runswithoutscissors ( talk • contribs) 22:29, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers, You observed some copyright problems with Cosmos-Maya. I had a look at the content in question and the related references/citations. I feel these were picked up as copyright violations because the content in question was the name of a technology or some numbers used to quantify something. E.g., "art and technology of Computer Animation & Digital VFX" and "600 minutes (30 half hours) of animation on a monthly basis." However, I do understand that some of these could have been avoided and therefore I have posted a new version of the article, as suggested, at this temporary page Thank you! Lukehaokip ( talk) 21:44, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi -
Thanks for letting me know re the potential copyvio on that article. Do let me know what needs reworking and I'll get to it. Vizjim ( talk) 06:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The odds are that the student(s) who worked on this will not care to fix stuff (the course has ended). So if you are interested in this issue, any copyediting you'd like to do to rescue any content would be much appreciated. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Please explain how I fix the article. Looking at the similarity identified they are mostly for official titles names and fields, I do not see how having the same title, book titles, and department and list of funders is copyright violation. I do not understand how I fix the issues given the statement not to remove the copyright warning. Could you please advise. And forgive me if this is the wrong way to raise this issue, but it is what I understand from the comments on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjushamillabakka ( talk • contribs) 12:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, I already have done a rewrite page at /info/en/?search=Talk:Frances_Westley/Temp Sjushamillabakka ( talk) 14:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thanks for your admin work Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 17:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC) |
Thine Antique Pen ( talk) 09:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
I created the Thorsborne Trail page, which was deleted due to copyright infringement. I am happy to rewrite with original content. How do I go about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kritik Dansaran ( talk • contribs) 10:06, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: So... you deleted Trovagene, but I already re-wrote the section that said "copyright infringed"... why? Abattoir666 ( talk) 13:01, 22 October 2018 (UTC) Apparently I was also the only individual to actually re-write it, or ask to have it checked (which no one seems to have done), why was it deleted? Check the edit that was auto-reverted by someone who didn't even look at it. Abattoir666 ( talk) 13:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
And yes, a viable re-write was proposed. Abattoir666 ( talk) 13:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: Did you check the edit that was reverted as I suggested before you deleted it? Abattoir666 ( talk) 18:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Also, why'd you delete the 'entire' page instead of just the bit surrounded by the brackets? Abattoir666 ( talk) 18:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Not in the slightest. I just think small companies and public laboratories focusing on curing cancer should have a larger presence on Wikipedia, you know, given the importance of the subject matter. The public 'wholly' neglects the field despite cancer being invariably one of the top ten causes of death worldwide. How are people going to know which companies to back, who to support, who to turn to, if the apparent gateway to popular understanding thinks that they are "not noteworthy?" Even CRISPR has a page, and it has 'no' bearing on the general public (except for that time the world got a laugh out of the fellow who tried to alter his own body's genetic structure, then promptly died). And you saw the version reverted by the other mod, because I could have sworn the passage cited for copyright infringement was effectually resolved. Abattoir666 ( talk) 21:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: Any news on bringing back cancer awareness to the masses? Abattoir666 ( talk) 14:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Justlettersandnumbers
I noticed that you have indicated a copyright issue on my the wikipedia page I created /info/en/?search=Josipa_Petrunic. This is my first Wikipedia article and it was approved a few months ago. I am the main author of this page. Each of the sentences included in the biography has been carefully referenced and summarized. The information that has been noted as being copied are from Dr. Petrunic's bio which is available in the public domain on multiple websites and I didn't copy it from any of the sites listed in the copyright notice given below. If there is an issue using it, I can remove those sentences.
"The previous content of this page or section has been identified as posing a potential copyright issue, as a copy or modification of the text from the source(s) below, and is now listed on Wikipedia:Copyright problems (listing):
https://www.bna.com/2017-Sustainable-Business-Summit-Toronto http://sogerman.ca/events/the-future-of-electric-mobility-economic-impacts-and-opportunities/ https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/canada-s-next-leaders-2018-top-40-under-40-1.1097343 (Duplication Detector report · Copyvios report)"
I would appreciate your help Thank you Parv Canada — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parv Canada ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Dear @Justlettersandnumbers -Thank you so much for replying. I would appreciate it if you could kindly clean up the page and I will work on it. Thank you so much for your help. Parv Canada
Hello justlettersandnumbers, Thank you for reviewing my page, I understand the reason for moving it back into the draft space, I have amended the quoted material, and am working on adding more relevant information for her. Could you please have another look at the page and let me know if this page is more acceptable for the wikipedia guidelines? I am working on this page for a university project and really would like for this page to be up on the main space. Fionarosewalters ( talk) 22:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing again, it has been surprisingly difficult for me to find information on her that isn't about her working for vogue, so this is why I have had to use that one source. Maybe this would be somewhere that someone else could improve upon if they have some other info on her. Either way thanks for your help! Fionarosewalters ( talk) 23:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
I just saw the changes you made to the William E. Lori article concerning a reported copyright violation. It is my opinion that you went way overboard. You deleted almost the entire article. Much of it was added by myself and I know that in most if not all of those additions there was absolutely no copyright infringement. I can't show you specific examples because the history has been erased. However, I urge you to be much more careful in the future. Display name 99 ( talk) 23:57, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Why are demons and ghouls always together?
What happens when you goose a ghost?
|
=I am a new editor, just finished being trained in a fellows (content specialists) class by WikiEd, not very experienced. I've been writing and editing mainly women in science articles and many of those I've improved have lists of works. Also, my content specialist in the fellowship class suggested that I add a list of important works to another article I was creating (Bette Korber). So I'd like to be consistent and keep Winzeler's selected works list in her article. Would you feel it was more appropriate if I cited fewer articles out of the many she's published? Or just ones with fewer authors? I'm pretty sure genomics research needs a big group but there are long lists of authors on some of her papers. I hope you can accept having this section reappear in some form. Thanks for considering this. LLMHoopes ( talk) 03:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Justlettersandnumbers,
Sorry, I'm fairly new to editing wikipedia, and have never had to deal with a copyvio/revdel issue before. I was hoping that you could give me some advice on the procedure for rewrites. An article I've been working on, Jim Towey, was apparently based on a foundational copyvio from 2010. The eight years of intermediate edits and my own extensive set of recent changes and additions have made it hard to tell, but I think I've managed to weed out all remaining traces of the original violation. I have a proposed rewrite up at Talk:Jim_Towey/Temp, and absolutely no idea what to do next.
Thank you, Genericusername57 ( talk) 04:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
On the page that I edited, you wrote the following, saying that there are copyright issues: "(copyvio blanking, foundational infringements of https://yellow.place/en/friends-of-tokai-park-cape-town-southafrica, https://www.pressreader.com/south-africa/cape-argus/20161128/281745563993432 and apparently some other source)" I don't even understand what any of this means, however there are no longer copyright issues. All I did was to update the links from the old ones to new ones. iSPOT migrated to iNaturalist. So why should this be a copyright problem? You didn't even give us a chance to fix the article according to Wikipedia's copyright rules, you simply blocked the page. Now I am a new user, and feel that this is a bit heavy handed. I'm also totally confused. Please see my talk page to show that all of the original articles now give access and allow external websites to use the content. If you are still not satisfied please explain clearly why. I would really appreciate an explanation (in simple English please, not Wiki jargon), and I would like to know if this issue can now be resolved please. Kind regards, Arebelo ( talk) 11:57, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For doing such a great job significantly cleaning up Elizabeth A. Winzeler, as well as the wonderful work you've been doing with your shiny new mop, dealing with copyright violations and deleting unwanted pages. SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 14:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hello Justletters and numbers. Could you take a look at my Edith Farmiloe page and tell me what I need to do to get it published. I have communicated as requested re my Lega Zambelli copyright issue but I have had no comeback. Regards etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adelphi14 ( talk • contribs) 12:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Could you take a glance at ticket:2018110210006552 ?
The good news is that there is a potential replacement article here: User:Ianwikramanayake/draft. The bad news is there is probably a conflict of interest so the replacement article would have to be reviewed enough so that you would feel comfortable with it. However, that might be easier than trying to tease out what needs to be cleaned out of the Problematic article,
Obviously, I could work on it as well but I noticed a jump in the backlog at OTRS and would prefer to work on the recent influx of requests.-- S Philbrick (Talk) 21:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
You may want to address this repeated violation. Regards -- Muhandes ( talk) 17:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I am sorry to bother you but I will need immediate semioprotection for my talkpage and Talk:DHX Media due to vandalism. Thank you. CLCStudent ( talk) 22:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
The offending copyrighted article was written by the same author as the editor who created the article. I've chatted with the author and they have agreed to release the text of the original source under CC. The original article ( http://www.ebritic.com/?p=703462) is now correctly licenced for use on wikipedia, and has a notice on the bottom of the article ("The text of this article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA), allowing anyone to share, distribute, transmit, and adapt it."). We should be good to go. Adding a note to that ref that it is CC would also be useful when restoring. Thanks very much. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 13:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
I know it's impatient of me to say this, and that you've said you wouldn't be the one to handle it, but it's been over a month since the copyright investigation for the summaries written in the List of Fairy Tail Zero episodes began. Since then, other editors have accepted and attributed it as "season 8" on related pages following my effort to retitle the page, improperly done as it was, which indirectly caused this whole debate. Not to mention, after the Japanese episode list template changed its coding weeks ago, all of the blanked material on the investigated article is displayed on the main List of Fairy Tail episodes article anyway. Because of the investigation notice, however, I've refrained from making any changes to the article to correct the display issue or rewrite any of the summaries. I've already provided attribution and made my case that the page has been subject to backwards copying, but I want to know if there's anything else I can do to resolve this. User:SubZeroSilver ( talk) 19:19, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
And we have WikiCommons for the Images. So shall I start to remove them? I love to... — Preceding unsigned comment added by FotoDutch ( talk • contribs) 16:07, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi ,is the Draft:Economic History of New Zealand still copyrighted?? I was considering accepting it but I see that the author added a big chunk of text into the draft after you cleaned out the copyright (12,000K text addition seems suspcious). I can't tell if he/she added copyrighted text to it (and I can't see the deleted revisions to compare the new text additions to the old text additions) can you tell me if it's still copyrighted?? Thanks JC7V -talk 03:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
New horse-related article: Gainsborough Stud. Looks like it needs some touch-ups; for instance, there was at least one date that wasn't verified and I just now had to add a citation that did. Any time you are able to spare would be appreciated. The article creator is a good-faith editor and a good researcher, however I'm not sure horses are at all his specialty. Thanks. Softlavender ( talk) 02:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. It is interesting for me, why you deleted the page "Eldaniz Elman oglu Mammadov"? He is one of the young and famous Library and information science specialist and scientist in Azerbaijan, and well known in Iran, Turkey and Russian with his scientific articles. Whith this page we are going to show scientific articles of Eldaniz Mammadov's, of course with the consent of doctor E.Mammadov's. We have listed a list of his scientific works. This page is also available in Azerbaijani. https://az.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eld%C9%99niz_M%C9%99mm%C9%99dov_(f%C9%99ls%C9%99f%C9%99_doktoru) Now we are preparing this page in English. So please help me recover this page and do not delete this page. Eldaniz Mammadov's students need this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gulnar Ibrahimova-Mammadova ( talk • contribs) 22:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Irish Bull Terrier - I reworked the article, proposed a merge. When you catch a break, I'm interested in knowing what you think... Atsme ✍🏻 📧 04:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Dear Justlettersandnumbers, This open official appeal
my name is Bohdan Rodyuk Chekan von Miller
I am an artist and industrial designer
The article on English Wikipedia Olena Chekan now set for deletion
Olena Chekan is my beloved Mother
OLENA CHEKAN – The Quest for a Free Ukraine - Bohdan Rodyuk Chekan (Ed.) http://derkonterfei.com/product/olena-chekan-bohdan-rodyuk-chekan-ed https://ukrainianweek.com/Columns/50/154401 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYnhrOGjrM8 http://titel-kulturmagazin.net/2016/03/25/schlaglichter-auf-die-ukraine/
OLENA CHEKAN - Hymns to Ukrainian Art – Bohdan Rodyuk Chekan (Ed.) http://derkonterfei.com/product/olena-chekan-hymns-to-ukrainian-art-bohdan-rodyuk-chekan-ed http://ukrainianweek.com/Culture/163918 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLcMRP4BxFM
She was the illustrious political journalist, a glorified Soviet and Ukrainian actress, prominent screenwriter and courageous person: for the extension of her life during Euromaidan all Ukraine fought, my mother died in my arms 21 December 2013, Kiev, Ukraine, from glioblastoma - brain cancer, the fourth stage of 18 months of life - a lot, you can see the statistics of this disease. And if we are talking about freedom of speech of the media in Ukraine, who did more than my Mom
http://gorbaniewska.zawolnosc.eu/ru/inne/1 http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~sarmatia/916/916morebooks.pdf
Therefore, in memory of Mom and Svetolik Skale Mitić, I started a new project:
/info/en/?search=List_of_journalists_murdered_in_Ukraine this article is the beginning of a photo exhibition for future elections in Ukraine My project is intended to bring democratic changes to a ruined country engulfed by war and Russian aggression.
• Svetolik Skale Mitić is my first husband of my Mother you know of course that Svetolik Skale Mitić was one of the founders of journalism in the countries of the former Yugoslavia, Svetolik Skale Mitić sent letters to my Mom even from Nicaraguan captivity. I still keep his love correspondence with my Mom. https://www.svoboda.org/a/26285034.html
• General Yevgeny Miller is the father of my grandfather's brother's wife: CHEKAN (née MILLER) Maria Evgenievna, 1897-1982. Brother of my grandfather (my Mom's Father Vasily Ivanovich Chekan) - Protopresbyter archpriest Alexander Chekan (Chekan Alexander Ivanovich) (1893 - 1982) https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/4077462?counter=1 He took part in the Russian Civil War: In the Volunteer Army and VSYUR Don Army in the 1st separate heavy howitzer division; since Aug. 28 1919 Second Lieutenant, since 30 Sep. (The Lieutenant). In the Russian Army before the evacuation of the Crimea - Siege of Perekop (1920). Staff-captain. He participated in the Gallipoli Campaign. Alexander Chekan was injured and dying from wounds, he was saved by a nurse - the future wife Maria Evgenievna, the daughter of the general Yevgeny Miller. Alexander Chekan continued to defend the Motherland on Dec. 18 1920 in the 1st battery of the 5th Artillery Battalion. He with his wife emigrated to Bulgaria (1921). He received his higher education in Sofia, where he was also the secretary of the branch of the Russian Student Christian Movement (RSCM). Chairman of the Union of Russian Students in Sofia and the Union of Russian Students in Bulgaria (1920s). Later they moved to France. Since 1947, Alexander Chekan the second priest, then the abbot of the Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Paris.
• my uncle - Jerzy Bogdanowićz Polish theoretical nuclear physics scientist, Prof.Bogdanowićz participated in the scientific activities of the Large Hadron Collider: http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/other/sissa-3-94-ep.pdf http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988NuPhA.479..323B project in CERN and was nominated for the Nobel Prize. Jerzy Bogdanowićz - in young age the hero of Warsaw Ghetto Uprising and was awarded with The Order of Polonia Restituta (Polish: Order Odrodzenia Polski, English: Order of the Rebirth of Poland) and The Cross of Merit (Polish: Krzyż Zasługi). at his funeral in 1999, which I attended with my Mother Olena Chekan there was the red white roses wreath from the President of Poland Aleksander Kwaśniewski.
• my mentor, a close friend of my Mother - Alex Moscovitch was a French politician and analyst. He was also an associate and companion of General Charles de Gaulle. We met in Moscow 1990, when my Mom was creating an interview book "The Star of Alex Moscovitch | Etoile d'Alex Moscovitch" based on regular tape recordings of conversations with Alex Moscovitch. The book-interview was published in Moscow at publishing house "NORD" 14 September 1992 with the autobiography of Alex Moscovitch "Le Temps Des Punaises" in Russian. Two years spent together with Alex Moscovitch became for me a school of life and experience that formed me. Alex Moscovitch photos on the Wikipedia page from my archive at home! I found this article and put it on his page too https://www.lemonde.fr/culture/article/2011/10/17/17-octobre-1961-toute-une-histoire_1587334_3246.html
The layout of the interview book "The Star of Alex Moscovitch | Etoile d'Alex Moscovitch" by Olena Chekan was created by my Father Stanyslas Rodyuk Master builder M.Arch. Ukrainian architect, founder of the principles of the use of fractal properties in the parametric architecture of postmodernism and urban planing in the USSR and Ukraine https://www.flickr.com/photos/155931501@N04/41187636625/in/album-72157691957163572/
• Stanyslas Rodyuk (born 24 November 1937; died 15 February 2003) was the author of the idea, creator of planning design and the developer of the architectural project of the building of The Druzhba Sanitarium in Yalta that is located on the Crimea peninsula, Ukraine, at present Russia in the Greater Yalta district. His aesthetic vision of planning was that of parametricism in urban architecture and embodied in the main promises of modernism: public space, light and a sense of opportunity.In connection with his political views, Stanyslas Rodyuk was suspended from completion of the building of The Druzhba Sanitarium in Yalta by the architect project leader Igor Vasilevsky - a son of a Marshal of the Soviet Union – Aleksandr Vasilevsky. Stanyslas Rodyuk died of left lung pneumonia caused by tumor load of sarcoma 15 February 2003. The Druzhba Sanitarium in Yalta [1] is recognized as the best architectural project in the history of all Soviet Modernist Urban planning [2] [3].
I knew these people personally! They are my family! at home I have a huge archive of their photos, letters and personal veshey
Yes, in creating these articles I acted as an amateur. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Your_first_article I independently learned and mastered the skills of working in HTML to create these articles in Wikipedia As I know one of the Wikipedia principles: make help this article better /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles
But by destroying and correcting with the lack of truth these articles (none of you personally knew them!), Wikipedia destroy the truth of history.. it is against the right to freedom of opinion and expression, AI and digital security could https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/OpinionIndex.aspx
https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G17/071/20/PDF/G1707120.pdf?OpenElement
https://news.un.org/en/audio/2018/10/1023932
I know that during a global catastrophe Wikipedia users will be encouraged to print all articles on available printers to preserve the history of Mankind, but what we will print if the historical truth of the Wikipedia articles will be lost forever? I please you not to turn Wikipedia into a copy-paste which is published under dictation «1984» Big Brother, it is unacceptable to turn Wikipedia into a fence with graffiti that is constantly being broken by anyone who wants.
We can join forces: the professional skills of all Wikipedia administrators and editing area Users with the historical documents archive, that I saved for these articles with documentary confirmed sources of external links.
I bid you, all Wikipedia administrators and editing area Users my hand of friendship and open heart! We can make these articles, about which I am writing in my appeal and the whole of Wikipedia better: Let`s do it! Together! T∴ A∴ F∴ Cordially, Bohdan Rodyuk Chekan von Miller Esq. Gauaren erregina ( talk) 16:32 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you reported the page Resham Dankh for speedy deletion due to copyright infringement. If you would kindly restore the page to the deleted version, or even move it to a Draft section, I'll rephrase everything in my own words. I was considerably busy and copied only a major part of ONE section. Everything else was proper. Thanks. SerTanmay ( talk) 17:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments on this article, but I would have thought that an article defining a general (financial) term was key to Wikipedia. I previously included numerous references to ACH Systems around the world ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Automated_Clearing_House#ACH_systems_around_the_world), but regrettably another editor removed those references. I will restore those references and add "see also's" for external information describing or making use of this generic term. Beyond that, if you can provide some advice, I'd appreciate it. Jedison brussels ( talk) 15:29, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
You have revdel’d content from The Scoots due to apparent RD1 violation from http://wiki.southparkstudios.co.uk/wiki/The_Scoots. This is blatantly false. The content of the site in question was copied from the WP article here, not the other way around. The article The Scoots was independently written by experienced editors including myself. Please immediately revert your deleted content and restore the page. Thank you. - SanAnMan ( talk) 15:51, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Regarding the deletion of the page for Penelope Trappes: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Penelope_Trappes&action=edit&redlink=1
The bio on Spotify that was cited as copyright infringement was written by me, manger of Penelope, with help from Penelope Trappes herself. We put the bio on Spotify and Wikipedia the same week (perhaps even the same day), as spotify allows managers to change their artists' bio. I am also the photographer who took the photos under the name Agnes Haus. I, and Penelope, are 100% ok with the bio being creative commons, copied, redistributed, changed, etc.. there is 100% no copyright infringement happening here.
Thank you! Flight005 ( talk) 18:44, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Agnes Haus is an alter ego of me, Stephen Hindman that i go under for art/management purposes (eg. photography/music management). I can refrain from editing The Golden Filter page. i didn't create it - but have in the past edited mostly discography bits so the page is more accurate - not sure if it's better to leave it as it was or keep it up to date (please advise?). As for paid disclosure, i don't get paid for this. Penelope and i are married and i haven't been paid to write bios. nor have i ever gotten a management fee, even though i "managge" aspects of the project. If it's possible to restore the skeleton of her page that would be great. perhaps someone else out there will fill in the information accurately. in an effort to prove i wrote the bio on spotify, and that i am Agnes Haus, i just put "-AH" at the end of the spotify bio:
https://open.spotify.com/artist/6shE4Y1z4lzRqoDp65XfzT/about . Either way, i completely respect keeping the integrity of Wikipedia, and really just kept the bio to the facts (no opinions). hope some of this helps, for better or worse. thanks!! --
Flight005 (
talk)
19:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Dear Justlettersandnumbers, thanks for cleaning up the Villa Romana Prize article today. I am relatively new in editing Wikipedia content, beginners mistakes ;-) Although I don’t get why you removed the added decade sub-categories in the receipient’s list? My opinion is, that the decade sub-categories would render the long list more legible. I also don’t understand your concerne regarding the three paragraphs of content (very skimpy) to be not neutral enough? It’s very descriptive, basic facts. Indeed, it could be improved grammatically, to much one-to-one translation from German. Thanks again dewilprj ( talk) 21:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Let me make this perfectly clear, as I thought I did in my edit summary, all I did was fix a list defined reference error that had been in the article since November 15. I have been working on clearing out a massive backlog at Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting, which is where this article - Maronesa - was listed at. All I did was comment the ref out, so if need be, it could be returned to the article if desired, as you apparently desire. I'm not involved in a content dispute on this article. However, if this article should ever appear in this category again in the near future, I will promptly ignore it. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 11:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm writing in regards to your report and subsequent deletion of the Gerovital Cosmetics draft.
You mentioned the issue was copyright violation, although I had no time to edit my draft regarding this, nor any indication as to which content was not appropriately reproduced. Furthermore, this issue was not reported initially by user theroadislong, with which I was working toward a final and complete version of the article. Since it was now deleted, I would like to know what steps I can take to rectify the issue, and if there is any way I could receive indications as to which content was infringing copyright.
Thanks! RazPalea ( talk) 11:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Please, be as kind as to let me know if you have an answer to my previous question. I would like to resume working on the article, and I need to know if you have any mentions regarding the copyvio you signaled.
Thanks! RazPalea ( talk) 11:30, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! RazPalea ( talk) 09:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for taking the time to review my COI edit request for Stash. Could you please clarify which parts of the request were objectionable so I can revise accordingly? Thanks! Mary Gaulke ( talk) 15:43, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
Elisa Rolle's articles". Thank you.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Please see Pure Storage - OTRS Ticket#2018110210006552 - Atsme ✍🏻 📧 00:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
I reversed your draftification of Sarah Binder. It was a bad decision: the article is adequately sourced, and very clearly meets WP:PROF (election to the American Academy is a selective honor of the type that meets #C3). — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:42, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi JLAN, thank you for your edits on this new article. I was reviewing its nomination for a DYK here and was concerned that there might be copyvios because some of the wording was too close to the original. Its seems I was right. I see it's been further edited since you removed visibility of copyright content. Could you take another look at that and let me know if you are content that it now okay. I really don't want to pass this for the front page if it breaches copyright. Bermicourt ( talk) 15:12, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
I voted at your (justified) Afd nomination of the above article, and quickly fixed a few things on the page. I think the main editor of the page has competency issues as a) they reverted my edits to create this version, and b) after I suggested they not edit until they learned how to, they contacted me directly with a cryptic email that began:
... but they have been editing since 2009. Just making a note of this as I saw your repeated requests for basic info on their page. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 16:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi JLAN, by coincidence I happened to be reviewing this one in the last couple of days and have not approved it because the images appear to violate copyright. Again, I'm no expert and would welcome a second opinion. Bermicourt ( talk) 17:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Can you take a look at this article, Pericle Fazzini, I noticed that you had reverted some earlier edits and it appears the same user has removed a large chunk of references (5 total), seen here. Apparently they prefer their own references. Article was, and still is, listed at Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting, where I ran across it. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 13:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
So, I guess Wikipedia is tougher about copyright issues than other issues? I ask because I've started other articles on Wikipedia that had problems for YEARS, yet u took 1 down for copyright issues, w/out even giving me 24 hours notice (article on George Grimm [Buddhist scholar])! If it's that important, then fine, I guess, but it seems pretty cold on this end. Put much more work into that than any article I've ever started on Wikipedia. Work I'll now have to do ALL OVER AGAIN, since the article is completely gone w/out a trace of it's ever having existed. Guess I should have saved it in a separate spot. Slarty1 ( talk) 21:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I would very much appreciate Any form of my article. I've put SO MUCH work into it. Most of my 2nd attempt was substantially different from other sources, IMNSHO. This is getting to b a heartbreak for me. I really think this guy deserves an English article. Pretty Please/thanx in advance. Slarty1 ( talk) 00:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for checking the Mount Potts page. It looked like there was a long history some of which might have been saveable, which is why I didn't simply delete it myself, but it definitely needed some expert attention! Grutness... wha? 12:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi JLAN. I don't think our paths crossed much before you became a sysop, but through your sysop interests (COPYVIO) and my maintenance interests (NPP) our paths have crossed since then. I admit to being a bit puzzled by your approach to copyright and was hoping I could gain more insight. I have noticed several times I have tagged something as G12 and where it seemed like there was a good to strong claim of notability rather than deleting it you placed the investigations template. I admit to not knowing a ton about that process, but do things get handled fast enough that this is truly better than performing the deletion? Since I could understand the logic of your actions there, even if it is out of step with other sysops, I hadn't asked questions before. However, your templating of Giovanni Parmigiani confuses me. I spent some real time to look for possible copyright issues and to remove those from the article. I also ensured that citations which were being used in the middle of the copied text were kept in the article and otherwise tagged both large problems (copyedit, an unreferenced section) and specific (more detailed claims which could use an in-line citation). Why was this not enough that you then felt the need to template the article? Should I, in your thinking, just be applying that template to places where I would be using G11 or requesting revdel when doing NPP? Thanks and Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:13, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. There seems to be an issue with the RevDel request function. I can no longer give the beginning and ending changes. Onel5969 TT me 16:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
{{copyvio-revdel
|url =
|start =
|end =
}}
.Hello, I did a rewrite to the David E Shaner article and place it at Talk:David E. Shaner/Temp. I also made a note on the David E Shaner talk page. Please let me know if there is anything else I should do to have the copyright concerns reviewed.
thank you
Ptarry ( talk) 00:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Where is my Briar Nolet Draft- It took me ages to write and now I can't find it. Please send it to me so I can edit it to perfection. DOnt let my hardwork go to waste — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danceawe ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, You deleted a photo I up loaded (Alina von Davier) for copyright violation, but I am the copyright holder. I set the copyright to CC w/ attribution, but the file was deleted anyway. I would like to use the photo you deleted fro her biographical entry. Please advise on how to replace photo. Cantineac ( talk) 18:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Saturnalia | |
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
Thank you for your notes on several of my additions yesterday - I'm a rookie at this and not yet 100% aware of the rules... no excuse, but it won't happen again... Lenny -- Lennycampello ( talk) 20:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas from London, JLAN ...
and a New Year filled with peace and happiness (and grapes, tangerines, panettone, ricciarelli, pan d'oro, and ciocolattini).
Best wishes, Voceditenore ( talk) 08:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
My very best wishes to all for the holiday season and for the New Year. For family reasons I will be on Wikipedia only infrequently – if at all – for several days from now. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 10:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I think the revision on the left here should be OK. I had reverted everything at that point, and added the tag in the next one. Home Lander ( talk) 22:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
Hello Justlettersandnumbers, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I saw you moved a page i created Osadolor Nate Asemota to Draft:Osadolor Nate Asemota because of a supposed copyright violation policy.
Kindly check https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Osadolor_Nate_Asemota For immediate considerations. Thanks Amosflash ( talk) 17:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 16:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
No personal connection sir, just doing a professional job as it deserve, I have publish couple of pages that meet the standard and guidelines of article creation.
Please help me and revert the page for review.
Thank you sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 18:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
I wasn't paid and can't be paid for it, I was able to reach out to their admin representative to initiate the process in other to be restored, I never wanted any of my created page being moved or deleted, this is almost 2 years I joined Wikipedia and have gain some experiences in page creation, the first thing I learned Is that the publisher must not relate or be a 3rd party to the person.
I simply contacted their admin team to send the process, maybe I didn't state it clearly initially, maybe because error in my sentences while explaining in details.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 19:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
The picture was taken by them, I just uploaded it on Wikimedia but didn't know how to fill the categories, that's why I ended up putting my name as the author, please I will edit it and add their team as the author
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 19:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
I hope you will attend to it as soon as possible sir,
Remain blessed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 03:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
I would like to protest your immediate deletion of Mark Biltz. Please it back either to the main article section or my user space and I will rewrite it. -- Omer Toledano ( talk) 05:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, PLease attend to my request, I will be grateful sir.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 17:41, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Let me also know if I can republish or you help me on bringing it back, the only issue it had has been resolve to verify the copyright holder, the article is well arranged....Thank you Amosflash ( talk) 17:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Justlettersandnumbers,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
SkyGazer 512
Oh no, what did I do this time?
23:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Dear Justlettersandnumbers You deleted my article "Andrzej Sztando". You said: "16:13, 1 January 2019 Justlettersandnumbers (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Andrzej Sztando (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.ue.wroc.pl/pracownicy/andrzej_sztando.html) " But have you found that there is statement on this page: "All the content of this page is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0" ? This text is written in 3 places on this page. Is it not enough? Preparation of this article (references) took many hours of my work... Can you explain this situation and help me please? Can you undelete this please. Thank you. Iszop63 ( talk) 18:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Note: This page pretty much covers all of 2018. There's stuff from most of 2016 and 2017 here, stuff from about July 2014 until mid-January 2016 here, and some even older stuff, from when I first started editing until about July 2014, here. But I often delete stuff from my talk, so none of these pages is complete.
I'm not ignore you i want to be agree Master Studio ( talk) 14:04, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm working on the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe page and I'm not sure why the content is being reverted to an outdated version. Yesterday, I added relevant footnotes and references and it has been reverted again. Please let me know how to proceed. Thank you. CIRad84 ( talk) 08:36, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Justlettersandnumbers, I've just edited "Fénix Awards" in order to rescue the page, maintaining part of your original information. I make the commitment to keep it updated. Following the Wikipedia advice, I'm letting you know this change, hoping that you won't mind and help me to improve the content of this page. Thank you. -- Lunaliu ( talk) 13:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
I wrote you because I thought, erroneously, that you were the creator of the page. My mistake. Anyway, neither do I copy the content of a page from another page. The information contained in Draft:Fénix Awards is all mine, as it's seen in the History of the page. It was I who put it in there and in Fénix Awards at the same time, because I thought that replacing the old draft was a previous requirement to make a new publication. In any case, the Draft:Fénix Awards is the one to repair, delete or reverse, not the other one. The work in Fénix Awards is new and original, not a copy-paste, (only from my sandbox, where it's still remaining), and has not a copyright violation. I'm not a relative with this stuff, only a fan who asked for some kind of help. It's for sure that the article may suffer from many issues but, as some user wrote: "it needs revision from a movie-spectacle expert". Sadly, again this article was "lost in translation", multiple mistakes, technicalities, and other obstacles that are placing it to a limbo, doing a small favor to casual readers, movie lovers, or general culture. The cry for help is still on the air for someone who has the faculties and the interest to serve and honor what should be the raison d'être of Wikipedia: accurate, reliable and verified information.-- Lunaliu ( talk) 21:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I saw you reverted my edit on Lombard Street (Baltimore). I placed the article in Category:Guardia Lombardi because, as it says in the article, the street is named after the town of Guardia Lombardi. I think this makes the article relevant to that category. Do you not agree? Ergo Sum 01:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Please attend to my request sir. THANK YOU Amosflash ( talk) 10:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
You seem to have reverted one of my edits...
...en route to deleting a pile of crap posted by a troll.
I approve. Narky Blert ( talk) 00:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. You requested a revdel for large parts of David Ostrowski a few weeks back per WP:COPYVIO. Lots of content has been readded to the article again, so I'm wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a peek to see if it's the same as the previously removed stuff. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 13:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. You requested a revdel for some parts of Baby Bootlegger. I tried to find the correct template for the article but could not find one, so I used what I found. I'm not a wikipedia expert but know about the topic of this page quite a lot. I will rewrite the article this week to remove the copyright violations. Thanks and sorry for the hassle. -- hki007 ( talk) 13:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. Thanks for your fast response and sorry for the similar copyright issues on both of the articles Baby Bootlegger and George Crouch I have recently written. I want to fix these problematic issues so that the accurate information remains. However, I remain somewhat confused with the Wikipedia policies, what is accepted and what is not. I know about the articles' substance but I'm not that much an expert when it comes to the Wikipedia process or technical details. Where could I find some layman intro to the Wikipedia policies, starting from very simple questions like "are cross-references inside Wikipedia good or bad?". As an example, I had a link in the George Crouch article to the APBA Gold Cup Wikipedia article, and after the latest revisions I notice that this cross-link has been removed. Is it a bad thing to refer to other Wikipedia articles? Is there something I can do to get the copyright violation notification removed from the George Crouch article? Big thanks. -- hki007 ( talk) 10:46, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. I'm a classic boat and historic ship aficionado. I wrote both the original Finnish wikipedia article https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/M/S_Wilhelm_Carpelan and the English article Finnish transport vessel Wilhelm Carpelan. The winter photo of the vessel in the Wikipedia articles is taken by me, I could see her for ten years from my office windows. I built the original Finnish article from information snippets from multiple sources, all in Finnish and Swedish, including printed military history magazines from the 1970s ( http://www.rannikonpuolustaja.fi/archive/1979_2.pdf) and early 2000s, and the obituary of the person who rebuilt the ship after the Finnish Navy decommissioned her. There's some later edits and additions to the pages by other Wikipedia contributors and I have not checked where all that information is coming from. I pretty much translated the English wikipedia article from my original Finnish article. One Finnish wikipedia editor did remove sections from my original wikipedia text saying that the information is not "relevant" which to me sounded a bit odd, especially now that I look at the sections that have been added by others, and tell about similar technical details of the vessel. -- hki007 ( talk) 17:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Please tell what one needs to do to get Wikipedia access to HighBeam and Newspapers.com? Thank you. -- Bbarmadillo ( talk) 20:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, JLAN - Kaldighi is back in the NPP queue. I saw where you redirected it back in Aug last year. Not seeing any improvement so I'm inclined to send it to Draft space until it's fixed. Your thoughts? Atsme 📞 📧 03:11, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
I'm curious for your opinion on the Mariah Robertson page. Should only take about 2 seconds, specifically these unreferenced gallery exhibition lists. And of course she wants to add more, because these lists apparently aren't enough. Spintendo ᔦᔭ 18:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
You just reverted a set of edits I made to the Corriente article, because one of the three citations I added was to a magazine article that I wrote. I'm not clear on what was wrong with the citation. Generally speaking, a magazine article like that one is a perfectly valid Wikipedia cite. Is your issue that Acres U.S.A. doesn't have an archive of the article on their own website, or would it be a valid citation from someone else, but not from me? Thanks. Gary D Robson 20:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gary D Robson ( talk • contribs)
Hi. As requested by Robert McClenon I am notifying you that a Dispute resolution request has been raised for your edits to The National Memo article. Please share your point of view at the dispute's page. -- Bbarmadillo ( talk) 19:32, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: Hi, May I know why are you reverting my all edits from article Remy Blumenfeld. It takes two days for me to prepare the whole article with proper citations and formatting. And, It took only few seconds to revert the whole article. The article complies Wikipedia guidelines and all the information is verifiable. If you think my edits not complies Wikipedia rules, you are free to add maintenance tags or can resolve the issue as per WP:FIXIT. Also, I would request you to please refrain from reverting my edits. I am taking the issue to Wikipedia Helpdesk. If there is any problem in my edits, they will inform me. Thanks 223.189.17.142 ( talk) 09:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: Thank you for explaining reason. What you reverted that was my edit. As I am associated with the subject, I do declare my conflict of interest here. As you told the article does not meet the Wikipedia's neutrality guidelines. I'm again preparing it complying neutrality guidelines and would share it with you for approval. Do it need to register myself on Wikipedia to make further edits. As edit option is disabled now. 106.209.177.61 ( talk) 16:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: Hi, I have registered myself on Wikipedia. Can you please check my sandbox, I have reworked on the article, complying Wikipedia's policy. See /info/en/?search=User:MrDavies/sandbox. I have cited only reliable references, also have removed promotional wording as per Wikipedia:Neutrality. I would appreciate if you can do a favor and let me what more can be done. If you find any error or any kind of violation in article, please feel free to fix it. Thank you. -- MrDavies ( talk) 15:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Yes, As earlier I disclosed that I am associated with the subject and have WP:conflict of interest. I work for Blumenfeld, but not directly paid to edit the Wikipedia article. You can consider me paid, if Wikipedia policy says so. I do not have problem.
Also, Please let me know if current article violates any policy. Also would request you to accept the article if it meets for approval. Thanks-- MrDavies ( talk) 16:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
In the United States, 'liberal' has lost its original nineteenth-century meaning of referring to liberal democracy, partly because the original objective of liberal democracy has been considered achieved in the United States since the end of the eighteenth century. Liberal instead does mean either left-wing or progressive, and I mostly agree with Spintendo that left-wing and liberal are equivalent in context. In any case, it isn't worth volunteer editors spending a lot of time working to tweak the wording to provide a better advertisement for a paid editor. However, Spintendo is mostly correct in an American context, and that is the relevant context. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Would you care to let me know how the business deal between GNM and Fleet Street's Finest Ltd. be covered in this section without just deleting it. It seems to be acceptable to cover other means of income generation for the paper in the sub headed - "Membership" subscription scheme - and other business links to DigitalArchive for example. Is it just the outbound link that's an issue? Should it just go to the Guardian page? Best regards, Bret Painter ( talk) 23:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
I do appreciate the Reference changes, of which I did not know the correct way of adding them.
I am though upset of the major changes to my article without my notification or request. As I noted it was just my first published version being to a certain stranded but not my final. You watered it down to an absolute boring piece of pure information with more errors and inaccuracies than original noted. Taking out a lot of information that I had citations for. As Dury did very little teaching throughout his later career, as well with the incorrect version of emigrated and immigrated. As Dury did not leave the US to "emigrated" to the country. "emigrated" Is From, not to. (He immigrated to the US.) As well with removing his marriage which is the reason why he left Europe as well with the change in the caption of his self portrait. It is noted he's 18 on the back, therefor it is from 1835. As I am irritated to such major changes without just suggesting them privately. Of Which some are better, yes, but it still doesn't give you the grounds to change so much without my notice.
I do appreciate the References change, but it's even more inaccurate then before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin.P.L ( talk • contribs) 17:34, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Justlettersandnumbers I disagree completely, I see that as just a sad excuse... Articles are by people and are direct references of their work, they do not go out to the whole community but allow the community to improve errors or inaccuracies. Wikipida makes it clear that people's articles are their work. I could make the same claim to anything the you've made. It was ready, it was to a good stranded with correct information with nothing wrong with citation. Just because it was not to a layout of your approval does not mean it wasn't. Don't throw me in another forum for your own changes which I see are worse. The direct TN State Museum article I cited had the same information. Along with the citation from the white house itself on the first ladies portrait. (He Immigrated to The U.S. He did not Emigrate from the U.S, If you included that he did emigrate from Kingdom of Bavaria to the United States, that would work. But, that wasn't added.) Mr. Dury is one of the Finest artist from TN, doing portraits of presidents and kings, he is notable by Wikipedia's standards.. Not yours. (As there are articles on lesser figures even shorter and sadder than mine, so don't be unreasonable.)
The page comes under Wikipedia's Fictional characters portal. Kindly don't redirect, remove or try to delete the page. Instead help improving and expanding it. I am aman goyal ( talk) 18:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
At some XfD or other in the last month, I recall saying something like "This is just the same tendentious breed-moves pattern by someone making the same argument over and over again", about an objection you'd raised. In retrospect, that was cranky on my part, and hypocritical, since I'm as consistent as you are in the arguments I make about such things, and I was recently professing a desire for us to get along better. So, I'm sorry about that. I don't quite recall the context, but it was at the tail end of a lot of stressy stuff from various parties all day long, and I took it out on whoever was handy. I vented in a similar way in the direction of Pigsonthewing around the same time span. Kind of a more-than-momentary loss of temper. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 07:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the refs at George Dury I just couldn't figure out what was going on there! Theroadislong ( talk) 22:11, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
I'll be Glad to explain myself for the concerns you brought up.
I hadn't changed the References yet because I was in the process of adding more, especially for the "Other Notable Subjects" section. Like I noted, if people were Interested they could find them all on the Tennessee Portrait Project's website with little difficulty, while I was in the processes of adding the rest.
As well Explaining that Dury was a Tennessean and spent a longer art career in the state of TN rather then Europe. (That he was primarily a State painter rather than a national.) I was in the process of coming up with a better sentence then putting a State and Nation together.
Dury's Marriage is the reason he leaves Europe for the US. I understand it not being a strong Citation, But it's something simple that shows they were married, as "Mount Olivet Cemetery" has it cited being the Same George Dury.
If you read the Full citation from the "Memorials of Sarah Childress Polk" you would have noticed that the President and First lady paid for their official portraits out of Pocket when leaving the White House in 1849. (Allowing them to bring them Home to Nashville with them.) President Polk would not have a portrait in the White House till the Buchanan Administration, While Sarah till the Arthur administration. Dury Was commissioned by the Ladies Association of Nashville to copy Mrs Polk's official Portrait(GPA Healy's) the one she owned for the white house. As Sarah's White House Portrait is the copy by George Dury, not the the GPA Healy. (You can see the GPA Healy's at Polk's presidential museum.) As For Sarah's other Portrait it was a widowers portrait with no relation to the White House commission, that's why I left it out.( http://tnportraits.org/polk-sarah-childress-dury-1878.htm)
I'll be glad to Fix these problems in just a short Time, Including the References which I know are a mess. (So Excuse them for just the time being.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin.P.L ( talk • contribs) 02:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ida Kar by Mark Gerson, 1974, grayscale, cropped.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 23:55, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Dear Justlettersandnumbers,
I was wondering if you could help me out with the Artist biography of: AIX1 And i was also wondering if you could help me with the biography of Recordlabel: Akhadir Recordings Amsterdam Wiki Link AIX1: /info/en/?search=AIX1 Wiki Link Akhadir Recordings Amsterdam: /info/en/?search=Akhadir_Recordings_Amsterdam
These pages are not for commercial purpose endings but for independence for both the artist and the record label
Thanks for your Time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akesc ( talk • contribs) 12:27, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
How is indicating the influence that a church has over a school promotion? People are free to decide for themselves whether they want to choose that school, but they have a right to know who's influential in running it. I note that there are as many editors who categorize themselves as atheists and agnostics in Wikipedia as Catholics and Christians, so I have no fear that a religion-friendly thrust will impose itself in Wikipedia. Jzsj ( talk) 14:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. First, a small technical issue: the talk page of List of Americans by net worth wrongly redirects to Talk:List of members of the Forbes 400. Could you please change that? Secondly, how do you suggest that names be added to that list without copyright controversies? The fact that Forbes lists in their entirety are found on Wikipedia - for years now and with virtually no opposition - should be taken into consideration. Regards, Yambaram ( talk) 23:49, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
I fixed the first issue so you can disregard it... I'd also like to hear your opinion on whether the Richest american/ s redirects should redirect to 1) List of Americans by net worth, or 2) List of richest Americans in history (the latter is the current state). Yambaram ( talk) 00:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Please accept my late apologies for being rude and obnoxious during The National Memo discussion. You were right and I was wrong. Having 140% of my contribution deleted got me a bit off the track - this should never be the case again. Thank you for being patient and tolerant all the way through. I learned a lot about the concept of notability and depth of coverage from this discussion. -- Bbarmadillo ( talk) 17:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Nikkimaria ( talk) 23:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi justlettersandnumbers, I wanted to reach out to you and ask for your assistance on improving the Dr. Paolo Casali page. If I can offer assistance on helping the page be neutral and utilize Encyclopedic content, please let me know. I am not a paid editor and have no intention of making unwanted changes on this page. The COI was disclosed on the talk page as well. Again, any input from you will help enhance the page and make sure it is written with a neutral point of view. Burles104 ( talk) 16:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Burles104
I wasn't aware until you said something that a company with actual newspaper articles on its web site might be violating copyright. I went back to the web site a few years after using those as sources and they weren't there, but that was because an editor with a COI wanted to improve the article and I was helping him. I had to find the articles the proper way at that point.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:50, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
I've mentioned you at Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Eyes_on_editor_Rusboot over our seemingly mutual concerns about User:Rusboot. Hope this is ok.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 01:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers! I would like to ask you for some advice. Recently, I have contributed for the page Natives (Éditions), but it was deleted. Maybe, Natives Éditions is not a huge company, but it is a very serious publisher and a really original music label. Do you think it is possible to do something in order to restore this page? I don't have now any access to its content on Wikipedia, the only link I could find is here: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Natives_(Éditions)
Thank you in advance for your advice! 1996Paris ( talk) 12:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
~ Amory ( u • t • c) 17:32, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
I see now ... I should have looked under Recent listings. Sorry for the extra work! And thanks. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 20:27, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi, justlettersandnumbers, I have given you the only ticket number that I have. I can not confirm what you write, "that a copyright violation was found". On the contrary: no violation was found. A substantial contribution was deleted unjustified. Even if it was deleted unjustified, you write, 'it would not mean that the content will necessarily be restored to the article'. I am surprised that the administrative procedure does not respect contributions untill they are proven to be incorrect, imprecise or in any way improper. After all, we donate time, effort and money. (April 1, 2018)
Best regards, Pauline van de Ven Vandevenp ( talk) 00:15, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I've reverted one of your edits by adding back the background section in the Bojana Sentaler entry (your comment mentioned it was deleted due to a lack of references). The references were already listed in the previous paragraphs but I've now added them directly to the background section text so it's more clear. Thanks Abonzz ( talk) 14:47, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Battle of Poison Spring appears to be pretty much a straight copy-paste from here. You're my copyright-problem-go-to-person (aren't you thrilled?). Ealdgyth - Talk 11:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Good morning Justlettersandnumbers, With regards to the /info/en/?search=SillaJen page SillaJen, I have deleted the parts that contain the copyright information. Also, I have requested the company to give permission to use the material that they have published through the newsletter and their website and they sent me an email approving it. It appears that "An email has been received by the OTRS Team." I was wondering if you could review the issue and resolve the current Copyvio message. Thank you for your kind consideration and support :) Best, Oncolytics101 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oncolytics101 ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Dear 'Justlettersandnumbers'. In february, you deleted and blocked a large and rather valuable contribution to 'digital painting' that I made over a long time, because of an unfounded copyright issue. You were checking he matter with the help of the ticket number that I gave you. As you can see, the lemma now only offers very limited information, partly inaccurate, and certainly not without commercial influence. What did you find out about the assumed 'copyright infringement'? Please let me know how we proceed. Kind regards, Pauline van de Ven (26/4/2018). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vandevenp ( talk • contribs) 09:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I made a section in the Transportation about walking and biking in Florence, and was wondering why it was removed? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katieadeclue ( talk • contribs) 18:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
I do not know what is your role in deciding this matter but since you removed the comments last time around thus I am reaching out to you to request that this matter be decided with urgency before the discussion gets out of hand again. I have been trying to avoid commenting there since you removed the comments but it is hard to keep oneself at bay seeing the gross distortion of facts and personal attacks by OP. OP has provided the evidence and NadirAli has responded, there is no place for the last comment by OP. I request you to please remove that comment. Also, please know that this report has nothing to do with copyvios, this is all about the content disputes between OP and NadirAli. OP has no pain in his heart for copyvio rather their heartache is different, it is all about getting an opponent blocked to tilt the consensus building process on multiple pages. OP's grudge against NadirAli is shown in below diffs.
Capitals00 Feud with NadirAli
[5], [6], Deceptive edit summary when reverting the WP:STATUSQUO restored by NadirAli. After that Capitals00 goes on the talkpage to make WP:PERSONALATTACK (the one in number 2), [7], [8] Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 01:53, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse (3rd nomination). Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 10:52, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello mate. I was noticed that you eliminate the contribution I added in this article because I did not put citations to contrast the information. If is possible, I want to recover the article in order to indicate the site I searched the history of this association. Thanks for paying attention.
Irene Christian Manu Silvia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irene Christian Silvia Manu ( talk • contribs) 13:40, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
I was pointed to this page I was pointed to this page /info/en/?search=Vladimir_Krulj and I think the infobox is wrong and done for promotional purposes as most of the other information. Can you please fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.27.229.242 ( talk) 08:07, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
We are student of Aerospace engineering and we know a lot about this topic. Moreover, you could watch the information that I have put if you enter in EASA official web page.
Thank you for your contributions but I have to say that our information is not invented.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Irene Christian Silvia Manu ( talk • contribs) 19:22, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Just for your information, see this on my talk page:
"Fram, it's my idea to correct all past violations if I found them or I'm notified, and as I said, it's my idea not to "copy and paste" from sources in the future, even if they are in PD or CC0; therefore if I do not find a PAST violation, and I'm notified and allowed to correct it, and this does not count as new problems ("old violations which are only found after the unblock obviously don't count as new problems"), I understand than this is the last chance unblock. --Elisa.rolle (talk) 11:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Elisa.rolle&oldid=830041401)
The violation for Dorothy Caruso was in August 2017. As I said if I was notified I would have taken care of it (as I did). Moreover, as you can currently see on my talk page, I'm "semi-retired", I do not contributed anymore new content on Wikipedia, and I'm only correcting things as I found them (or I'm notified). KR, Elisa.rolle ( talk) 19:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Please respond to my response: User_talk:Dream_Focus#Puzzle_Puppers_moved_to_draftspace Dream Focus 11:49, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, amongst other edits you deleted the list of all extracurricular activities apart from sport, but made no reference to this in your edit notes. What is the thinking here? Rhanbury ( talk) 16:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I did read the edit summary. Throughout the rest of the article you have added the cn tag on unreferenced material, except in this one case where you deleted the sentence instead. I am trying to understand why the difference in treatment. I am not particularly attached to the sentence, which long predates my involvement, although there does need to be more than sports under the extracurricular heading so I shall seek out some references. On the COI point I have put full details on the talk page and would ask you to remove the COI tag at the top if you are satisfied. Thanks. Rhanbury ( talk) 07:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Zircon 2 ( talk) 16:25, 21 June 2018 (UTC) Justlettersandnumbers, thanks very much for taking the time to review the recent Geology of Uganda article! If you would like to consolidate the references to the Thomas Schluter Atlas of African Geology, that would be excellent. I am a comparative newcomer to Wikipedia, and I appreciate all the people who have reviewed the recent launch of geology of Africa articles. A technical question you may understand better than I do. From a category or SEO perspective, is there a reason why none of the African country geology articles are showing up in general search engine searches?
At Post-presidency of George Washington for lifted text and close paraphrase. I removed some and revdel and then did a second scan, and I suspect it has more close paraphrase and copying that I don't have the time this week to get to it and I don't want to send an article on a significant historical figure to CP unless absolutely necessary. If you don't have time, that's fine, but thought I'd reach out as you're great at this type of thing. TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply on Talk:Paolo Casali. I left follow up questions and comments. Thanks again. -- Meriville ( talk) 03:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! You changed the entry for Töfrahöllin into a redirect to the entry for the author. I'm not sure why: the entry cited two reviews, which demonstrates that it is notable. Your edit summary mentioned that there were no citations, but we shouldn't expect citations in summaries. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it was a great entry, and lots more could be done with it, but maybe it would be more appropriate to mark it as a stub than remove it? I'd be interested to hear what you think. Thanks! Alarichall ( talk) 21:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi J-lan. I think you meant to say the content was copied from https://web.archive.org/web/20080731210843/http://www.toll.com.au:80/about.html and was added with this diff? Could you please fix the necessary pages (article, WP:CP entry, and user talk)? I would do it myself but I don't want to make assumptions about what you were trying to say. Thank you, — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 17:34, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Due diligence fail on my part... sorry... pours ashes on head -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 07:46, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
—SerialNumber54129 paranoia / cheap sh*t room 14:04, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
Since when do football stubs need more than two references that directly reference everything that's written on the stub itself? Maybe I'm still living in the past, when it was still acceptable. You put two of my articles into draftspace though, when 4 similar articles were reviewed. If you look across Wikipedia, you'll see hundreds, no - thousands of such articles with no fuss about them. -- Janisterzaj ( talk) 15:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | |
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 22:38, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your explanation on my Talk page. However, I'm confused about where to proceed with my work on the article. You provided a link [9] to create a temp, but the Draft:Richard_Moya is still out there, and it contains my work with its revision history. I would prefer to keep working at the original at the draft location, so the revision history is not lost. Can you somehow undo your mistake there? Mbcoats ( talk) 20:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
My article has been published as Richard A. Moya. Thanks for you help. Mbcoats ( talk) 18:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers I could use some advice. What do you make of List of artworks by John Middleton, given that you've created List of works by Giambattista Pittoni? I think it goes against guidance at WP:CSC. What's your view? Thanks, Vexations ( talk) 21:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Forgot to let you know, but sent you an email a few days ago. No need to reply if there's no need, just forgot to mention. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 12:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I saw that on July 9, you reverted the Marc J. Lane page to a previous version because of a paid editing violation. However, I have since updated my user page to fully disclose who I work for in accordance with Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, but please let me know if there is anything else I may be missing. Otherwise, please undo the revert as some of the information in this previous version is no longer accurate. Thanks so much. Mannpark ( talk) 15:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
FYI for when you return... Our old friend is back. See this "new" user and especially the global contributions. If not already there, put Carlo Bazzi, Ezio Moioli, and Ladislao de Gauss on watch. He also seems to be editing James Rivière (again) both here and cross-wiki as the IP 151.38.20.48. I'll be away in Italy August 2–September 3, but will check in once in a while. Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 06:45, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Sir, you moved an article related to Gadhawa Rural Municipality in draft because of publishing without references. I was quite busy while creating that article at that time.Now, I have mentioned reliable sources and references of contents on that draft.Would you mind to publish that draft? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharad87 ( talk • contribs) 16:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
I feel like the Sirens article you flagged for deletion is notable. Maybe you can add to the article? Plus look at my new signature — ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 21:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Surreal Barnstar |
You are a jerk ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 22:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC) |
Sir, Gadhawa rural municipality and koilabas are different regions. This rural municipality has been established since last two years by federal government of Nepal. I am a resident of Gadhawa Rural Municipality ward number 1. So,I would like to request you to publish Gadhawa Rural Municipality article.Many VDCs, including Gobardiya VDC has been merged to form Gadhawa Rural Municipality. Sincerely, Sharad87— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharad87 ( talk • contribs) 11:43, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
At least check the sources you're deleting before you blank an entire page. The archive source clearly stated "Usage Public Domain / creative commons & uncopyrighted" Just the fact that we have on Wikimedia a copy of the entire song should be evidence enough, but if it's not, then it's reinforced by how the sources very clearly stated that it's public domain. I don't think you're acting in bad faith, but I do think you're acting foolish. Brendon the Wizard ✉️ ✨ 18:09, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
I work for Meetoo the organisation and created the article that you said is copyrighted via this wikipedia page /info/en/?search=Draft:Meetoo
How can I show you the evidence? I can change show you that I can login to that page and show you? That is also my author section https://www.meetoo.com/blog/2017/meetoo-a-brief-history.
Here is another one of my blogs on this website: https://www.meetoo.com/blog/2018/3-reasons-you-must-try-a-student-response-system-this-year
I also declared that I work for the company and that this page is completely taken from other independent sources and references. I am not sure why this is becoming such a challenge?
Many thanks, Ben.
I am undoing all of your redirects. You pissed me off. Thanks for ruining my birthday. Make sure to think about my feelings, as well as the fact that I am bisexual.
Plus, if Sirens can’t have a page, why can’t The shape of my heart song by nas have one?
ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 19:10, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, this was the first draft I moved to mainspace after being accepted at AfC earlier today and I noticed you tagged it with a few issues pretty quickly once I had moved it. It seemed like the subject would pass an AfD based on some searching, so I'm just checking to see if you thought I was too hasty with accepting it, just to ensure I'm on the right track? SportingFlyer talk 11:49, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Why do you have to assume that people who edit a webpage have a relation with the subject? So people cannot edit their favourite soccer players? or musicians?
I welcome your input on American Bucking Bull. Atsme 📞 📧 21:14, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
I've revdel'd the IP's edit; I think that is the one you were concerned was a copyvio. Let me know if this is not the case. Mjroots ( talk) 20:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Just a little recreational reading for you and Scope creep: Talk:Rodney Lough Jr.. Enjoy! -- Hoary ( talk) 23:24, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. I'm new to Wikipedia and still getting familiar with things. You flagged some updates made to Cabbagetown, Toronto that I made. Cabbagetown HCD Committee is a group that I am part of. My name is noted on the groups website. The page Cabbagetown, Toronto was updated with original content from our committee. Other revisions to some incorrect information was also amended on the page. If the changes haven't already been sourced, the content has been affirmed. I'm still trying to figure out how to reference my sources. My apologies if I missed something. I will ensure that updates and changes conform with the policies and guidelines of the Wikipedia community before edits are saved. If there is anything I can provide or assist with, please let me know. Thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia. StudioLAND ( talk) 23:56, 17 August 2018 (UTC) |
Thank you for your prompt input into this page. I have just posted only the first two sentences and the discography as the content is not found at https://sydneyeisteddfod.com.au/articles/margaret-baker-genovesi/. I hope this will be an acceptable start. Spt.08 ( talk) 13:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for that. Sorry again for the extra work. I had been granted use of the content and that image by the creator of the text and owner of the image for use (so it was not personally contentious) but was unaware it was from a printed article. I can definitely see the complexities for Wiki for any textual similarities. This is not a criticism of your actions or the policy of Wiki at all but I do wonder about the challenges of being able to present comprehensive biographical information re classical performers as
To this end, I have been reading through a number of biographies of this sort, especially of living artists, and a lot of the material is presented in a somewhat stilted manner and I wonder if this is as a result of the constraints for entirely original content. To me, this impoverishes the content somewhat viz: /info/en/?search=Taryn_Fiebig; /info/en/?search=No%C3%ABmi_Nadelmann; /info/en/?search=Susan_GrahamAnyhow thanks again Spt.08 ( talk) 20:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC) Hi again - did I do the wrong thing by posting the revised draft on your talk page? Thanks Spt.08 ( talk) 11:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I just wanted to let you know that I am not being paid by Jeff to edit his wikipedia page. He is a friend and I have been helping him with this. We took directly from his autobiography because it's comprehensive. Working with him to create an edited version of his autobio that's not self-aggrandizing, but just verifiable facts. Alaks Hovel 23:22, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Well there were several links to external sources corroborating the claims before the entirety biography was deleted, so. Alaks Hovel 15:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alakshovel ( talk • contribs)
You are an ignorant bully, who tires to impose his own understanding of the term "promotion"! Your actions are very alarming and are to be brought to the attention of the wiki community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avhahn ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
Can the link be added under a new section "External Links"? The source is referenced in numerous articles (reliable or not) and is often the only source. I understand that the pages there have not been tended to or updated in years, however some information is still pertinent and may support other sources. Refiner ( talk) 15:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi
I have rewritten the Alex Sloley article in my own words. There should be no copyright issues now. I have put in the correct place as a temp sub page.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Disappearance_of_Alex_Sloley/Temp
I understand that I have to ask you to replace the old article with the revised one?
Nacentaeons ( talk) 17:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
In this edit, you said "oh, please, this is a UK English page, 'meet' is an ordinary transitive verb". In the US, if someone "meets" students, it means she's introduced to them, and that may be the entirety of the interaction, whereas if she "meets with" them, she spends time in a meeting with them. Is that different in UK English? MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 21:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
You have removed an edit that I made on the UAL page regarding the partnership schemes that they offer through several colleges outside London e.g. Buckinghamshire College Group. Please advise why you have removed this as the edit was correct; my daughter has completed and received her certificate for a UAL qualification there last year, and is enrolled for an extended version of her UAL Diploma for this coming academic year. Wordsworthnothing ( talk) 07:33, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
~ Amory ( u • t • c) 12:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm fairly new to editing so please forgive my trail-and-error approach. I wrote the article on Jon Jashni. I've cited my conflict of interest as I am associated with the company he runs. I feel I have kept the article neutral in tone, though I'm unsure how to request a cleanup if one is required. So that I may improve the article, might you give me an example of what further secondary sources are needed to meet the notability criteria for creative professionals? Based on what I have learned on Wikipedia:Notability (people) I feel this article cites numerous reliable sources that are independent of the subject, in addition to citing the significant role he played in his body of work. And his membership with the AMPAS, AFI, and PGA certainly denotes he is an important figure in his professional field. Please let me know how I might improve this article. -- Xxxx7291 ( talk) 05:38, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Xxxx7291
Hi, I wasn't able find the copyvio quote you noted in the link you provided in the tag. Can you confirm the link is correct? Thanks - wolf 16:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
You added the notability tag to John Treviño Jr. recently. This page is under construction, as mentioned in the comments, 'Initial Stub'. Given how long ago the subject lived, online information is limited. In my opinion he is notable and I will continue to develop material to flesh out the article. Mbcoats ( talk) 02:29, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Moving above comment to John Trevino Jr. talk page.... Mbcoats ( talk) 01:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you don't mind me reverted the deletions for BAME Labour and Mike Grindley. I'll work on rewriting them over the weekend hopefully, if that's OK. RevertBob ( talk) 07:52, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers. I wonder could you update me? Many thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 10:41, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Martinevans123, it's not actually obligatory to upload freely-licensed files to Commons rather than here, it's just where they should be; nor does it actually have to be the copyright holder who performs the upload, though that is usually the person who has the original version of the file with the EXIF data intact. This molehill has already developed into a decent-sized hill, so do please proceed however seems easiest to you, and someone will probably run around and fix it afterwards if necessary. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 10:19, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
I removed the COI template from Jon Jashni because 'X' has made a PAID disclosure on the Talk page. Left the notability template in place. Shortened the article. David notMD ( talk) 12:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi. thanks for reverting my changes on the above article citing WP:COI. I'm a member of the Institution - trying to do research on the organisation in an attempt to one day pass the excruciating examination for full entry. Thought I'd update the wikipedia which is poorly formatted and woefully out of date - and lacking information - so that people in the future would have some sort of idea regarding the history. The Institution is a charity - and I'm not the owner or trustee of said charity.
Any indication as to what sort of Conflict of Interest I may have exactly, and how you came to that conclusion? Hakini ( talk) 22:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
I am a little confused as to your action on Cautious Clay, of which there is now one version in the draft space. There had been two versions, in article space and in draft space, both with tags about possible conflict of interest editing. I had changed the draft into a redirect to the article. You reverted my edit, with a comment that there had been a copy-and-paste move. This leaves the version in draft space standing. You then converted the article into a redirect back to the draft. This leaves article space redirecting back to the draft. First, I see that the article was created as a copy of the draft, which strips attribution and so is technically plagiarism of the copyleft on the copied article. I hadn't understood what is meant by a copy-and-paste move, although I knew that it was not a good idea; now I know what it is. But, first, was the article draftified because it was improperly created? Second, there is now a redirect from article space into draft space. I thought that redirects from article space to draft space were not appropriate and were supposed to go R2. Is there a reason why there is now a redirect from article space to draft space, or is that a mistake? Also, what should I do in the future if I determine that both a draft and an article exist, but the article is a copy of the draft? Is there a way to report copy-and-paste moves? Robert McClenon ( talk) 19:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
You said that you would look at this situation when it came up. At least I think that is what you said.
I accepted Draft: Youngjae (South Korean singer), after moving the previous redirect entry, which was a redirect to Got7, to Youngjae (South Korean singer) (old version). The new draft is now the article. The problem is that the redirect now contains some history. Normally I would just have the redirect tagged for G6 deletion as housekeeping. Should I have this old version deleted, or does it need a history merge or what? Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:21, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi, so I have added several reliable third-party sources pointing to Jeff Hunt as the founder of the Table of the Elements label. Can we move along with submitting this for review?
/info/en/?search=Draft:Jeff_Hunt_(music_producer)
Thank you! Alaks Hovel 14:36, 14 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alakshovel ( talk • contribs)
It seems like there is some asymmetrical moderation going on here. Did I do something particular to upset you guys? I've seen entire articles of people that rely on a single article (i.e. /info/en/?search=David_Haggerty_(tennis)) but were processed as submissions, even though labeled as a Stub. What exactly in the article do you think people will have substantial problem with? This biography? Because the biography at this time only states "Jeff Hunt is the owner and a co-founder of the label Table of the Elements, described by Pitchfork Media as "a national treasure."" both of which are claims easily corroborated by the seven sources listed as reference. Is it the discography that's causing the issue? I want to get to the bottom of this before I press "submit" because I'm not quite sure what the major issue is exactly, and I want to address it. Alaks Hovel 14:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Some red links to put on watch... Under the guise of the IPs 151.68.12.69 and 151.20.21.172, he has been busy creating numerous articles on numerous WPs on a chap called Gabriel Grego and sometimes Gabriele Grego. See here for more. There's a particularly fanciful one on the Esperanto WP [10]. Grego's apparently one of the partners of the now-deleted Quintessential Capital Management. I imagine what interests our friend is Grego's side interest in kickboxing and mixed martial arts. Meanwhile a new account, Saver68 has been merrily uploading loads of images of Carlo Biotti. Another new account QCM100 has been busily uploading images of Grego to Commons as "own work" which they clearly are not. There's another new account at Commons SandraPol23, who takes an uncommon interest in the ...er... Biotti's and Polli's. Also pinging AttoRenato. Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 15:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Let me know when you read it! ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 01:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
...but I need your copyvio expertise regarding what steps to take for this issue. I'd really rather turn it over to you as I suck at being an OP at noticeboards, so if you would be so kind as to take a look at this issue (which led to many more) it would be much appreciated. My original question was on the TP of Moonriddengirl who is currently very busy in RL. I saw that Amory posted on MRG's page, so that's where I went hoping to get the issue resolved. I can't figure out how the subject article was promoted to GA, much less passed GNG, and that doesn't count all the other copyvio issues involving that same editor, so I'm feeling a bit overwhelmed by it all. Atsme ✍🏻 📧 22:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
{{subst:copyvio|url= source(s) }}
(that generates instructions, and code to be left on the listing for the day and on the user's talk-page). I'll try to take a look tomorrow. 'Night,
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk)
23:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Here you replaced {{ snd}} with a raw spaced n-dash. Do you have any particular reason for disliking the template? The dangers of writing it literally as you probably know are (a) an possible line break before the ndash (admittedly would need an unusually narrow window in this case) (b) subsequent editors unable to see easily, in monospace, whether it's a dash or hyphen so have to take extra time to check, which I tend to do a lot. And of course " – " is even uglier. David Brooks ( talk) 19:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
I am making a new article, and can you help (I.e. by adding sources and details) me? The article is about Vengeance by Denzel Curry. The video DID recently drop. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 19:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Justlettersandnumbers. Do you intend to indefinitely block me for copyright violation? This is an obvious question in my mind and I think the best thing is just to ask it directly. Will it happen? I'm trying to cooperate on my talk page, only if you definitely do intend to block me and have made up your mind about this, that doesn't encourage me to continue. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 01:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Just to let You know I give You support for the RFA nomination. Looking at Your edit history, I think You make a good candidate. Eddie ( talk) 21:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Palazzo Pesaro Orfei at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
21:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
TheSandDoctor Talk 16:56, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
On 1 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Palazzo Pesaro Orfei, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the designer Mariano Fortuny established his studio in the Palazzo Pesaro Orfei in Venice, he was one of about 350 people using the building? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Palazzo Pesaro Orfei. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Palazzo Pesaro Orfei), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 00:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
(Early) congrats on its passing! 99% - an impressive feat. That means unless 29% or more change to oppose within 3 hours (highly unlikely
![]() ![]() |
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the Administrators' guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to get in touch on my talk page. WJBscribe (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful RFA! It's your turn to hear the words of wisdom I received from Katie after my RFA passed: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales, because if it did, it would be much, much better. All rights released under GFDL. |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Congratulations on your highly successful RfA! We all know you'll be good with the mop! Semi Hypercube ✎ 00:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC) |
Yes, very well done, JLAN. Look..... I have dispensed with the usual rainbow-clad unicorns, boxes of kittens, strong beer and chocolate cakes, And I've gone for "just lettuce and Humbers"!! Enjoy! lolness Martinevans123 ( talk) 12:35, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
... to anyone and everyone who took part in this, whether with questions, corrections, support, advice or criticism. Thank you all for the trust and confidence you have – collectively – placed in me! Now I just need to live up to it ...
I most particularly want to thank MRG, Amory and Alex for their steady support, wise guidance ... and patience. Thank you so much! Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 16:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Congratulations on your RfA - take it slow, and ask for help if you're ever unsure. Good luck!
![]() |
Congratulations on your successful RfA. I hope you will wield the mop with care and that you will take to heart the concerns that were raised there about your tone and approach to new editors. I think you know that you may be the first voice that some people hear on wikipedia. Although policy is clear, it can be applied with a carrot and kind guidance as opposed to a bat. Sometimes the cluebat is needed, but now that you have some very powerful tools at your command, you need to be slow and cautious in their use. ( "With great power comes great responsibility".) I urge you to think about the interactions that you and I had in your early years here, where, sad to say, the tone of our respective written words led each of us to almost precisely the same (wrong) conclusions about the other. We desperately need to nurture content editors. Most people who make mistakes — including you and I — can learn and grow from them. Good luck. Montanabw (talk) 17:51, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
...on your RfA, you had a very impressive turn-out. I'm glad it didn't turn into a train-wreck like so many have as of late. But anyway, good luck to you with your new duties. Cheers - wolf (#61) 15:11, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
I've reverted this edit (and the two that followed) as they appeared to copy word-for-word from the cite linked. I'm not really familiar with copyvio policy, so what should happen next? A report somewhere? Rev/del? Something else? Thanks - wolf 15:26, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
I think I figured out what you meant by fixing the lack of attribution for the List of Fairy Tail Zero episodes, but I need confirmation. Is putting a {{ Copied}} template with the proper ID's at the top of each talk page for the list and Fairy Tail Zero all I have to do? I also don't understand what you mean by "our license". User:SubZeroSilver ( talk) 00:29, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Alec Smithson. Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 08:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Remember this Natoli? Well, his alleged son Amedeo died on the Simple, Italian, German, and French Wikipedias, but has risen from the dead on the Danish one where he is preposterously described (in apparently execrable Danish) as "having revolutionized the insurance and insurance reinsurance industry and defined the structure of modern philanthropy" and "having become the world's richest man and the first billionaire in US dollars and often considered the richest person in history". Not only that, according to Wikidata he was a practicioner of boxing and savate. Meanwhile I've now taken the Commons SPI findings to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems for blocking and tagging. We'll see what happens. So far no response. Best, Voceditenore ( talk) 12:59, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Justlettersandnumbers, I received the notice from you that edits to the Rex Ray have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material. I am the copyright holder for items that require a copyright ie photo, publishing attributions and authorship content. How is it that you remove these edits without knowing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Runswithoutscissors ( talk • contribs) 22:29, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Justlettersandnumbers, You observed some copyright problems with Cosmos-Maya. I had a look at the content in question and the related references/citations. I feel these were picked up as copyright violations because the content in question was the name of a technology or some numbers used to quantify something. E.g., "art and technology of Computer Animation & Digital VFX" and "600 minutes (30 half hours) of animation on a monthly basis." However, I do understand that some of these could have been avoided and therefore I have posted a new version of the article, as suggested, at this temporary page Thank you! Lukehaokip ( talk) 21:44, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi -
Thanks for letting me know re the potential copyvio on that article. Do let me know what needs reworking and I'll get to it. Vizjim ( talk) 06:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
The odds are that the student(s) who worked on this will not care to fix stuff (the course has ended). So if you are interested in this issue, any copyediting you'd like to do to rescue any content would be much appreciated. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:25, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Please explain how I fix the article. Looking at the similarity identified they are mostly for official titles names and fields, I do not see how having the same title, book titles, and department and list of funders is copyright violation. I do not understand how I fix the issues given the statement not to remove the copyright warning. Could you please advise. And forgive me if this is the wrong way to raise this issue, but it is what I understand from the comments on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjushamillabakka ( talk • contribs) 12:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, I already have done a rewrite page at /info/en/?search=Talk:Frances_Westley/Temp Sjushamillabakka ( talk) 14:04, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar |
Thanks for your admin work Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 17:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC) |
Thine Antique Pen ( talk) 09:37, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
I created the Thorsborne Trail page, which was deleted due to copyright infringement. I am happy to rewrite with original content. How do I go about this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kritik Dansaran ( talk • contribs) 10:06, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: So... you deleted Trovagene, but I already re-wrote the section that said "copyright infringed"... why? Abattoir666 ( talk) 13:01, 22 October 2018 (UTC) Apparently I was also the only individual to actually re-write it, or ask to have it checked (which no one seems to have done), why was it deleted? Check the edit that was auto-reverted by someone who didn't even look at it. Abattoir666 ( talk) 13:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
And yes, a viable re-write was proposed. Abattoir666 ( talk) 13:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: Did you check the edit that was reverted as I suggested before you deleted it? Abattoir666 ( talk) 18:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Also, why'd you delete the 'entire' page instead of just the bit surrounded by the brackets? Abattoir666 ( talk) 18:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Not in the slightest. I just think small companies and public laboratories focusing on curing cancer should have a larger presence on Wikipedia, you know, given the importance of the subject matter. The public 'wholly' neglects the field despite cancer being invariably one of the top ten causes of death worldwide. How are people going to know which companies to back, who to support, who to turn to, if the apparent gateway to popular understanding thinks that they are "not noteworthy?" Even CRISPR has a page, and it has 'no' bearing on the general public (except for that time the world got a laugh out of the fellow who tried to alter his own body's genetic structure, then promptly died). And you saw the version reverted by the other mod, because I could have sworn the passage cited for copyright infringement was effectually resolved. Abattoir666 ( talk) 21:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Justlettersandnumbers: Any news on bringing back cancer awareness to the masses? Abattoir666 ( talk) 14:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello Justlettersandnumbers
I noticed that you have indicated a copyright issue on my the wikipedia page I created /info/en/?search=Josipa_Petrunic. This is my first Wikipedia article and it was approved a few months ago. I am the main author of this page. Each of the sentences included in the biography has been carefully referenced and summarized. The information that has been noted as being copied are from Dr. Petrunic's bio which is available in the public domain on multiple websites and I didn't copy it from any of the sites listed in the copyright notice given below. If there is an issue using it, I can remove those sentences.
"The previous content of this page or section has been identified as posing a potential copyright issue, as a copy or modification of the text from the source(s) below, and is now listed on Wikipedia:Copyright problems (listing):
https://www.bna.com/2017-Sustainable-Business-Summit-Toronto http://sogerman.ca/events/the-future-of-electric-mobility-economic-impacts-and-opportunities/ https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/canada-s-next-leaders-2018-top-40-under-40-1.1097343 (Duplication Detector report · Copyvios report)"
I would appreciate your help Thank you Parv Canada — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parv Canada ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Dear @Justlettersandnumbers -Thank you so much for replying. I would appreciate it if you could kindly clean up the page and I will work on it. Thank you so much for your help. Parv Canada
Hello justlettersandnumbers, Thank you for reviewing my page, I understand the reason for moving it back into the draft space, I have amended the quoted material, and am working on adding more relevant information for her. Could you please have another look at the page and let me know if this page is more acceptable for the wikipedia guidelines? I am working on this page for a university project and really would like for this page to be up on the main space. Fionarosewalters ( talk) 22:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing again, it has been surprisingly difficult for me to find information on her that isn't about her working for vogue, so this is why I have had to use that one source. Maybe this would be somewhere that someone else could improve upon if they have some other info on her. Either way thanks for your help! Fionarosewalters ( talk) 23:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
I just saw the changes you made to the William E. Lori article concerning a reported copyright violation. It is my opinion that you went way overboard. You deleted almost the entire article. Much of it was added by myself and I know that in most if not all of those additions there was absolutely no copyright infringement. I can't show you specific examples because the history has been erased. However, I urge you to be much more careful in the future. Display name 99 ( talk) 23:57, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Why are demons and ghouls always together?
What happens when you goose a ghost?
|
=I am a new editor, just finished being trained in a fellows (content specialists) class by WikiEd, not very experienced. I've been writing and editing mainly women in science articles and many of those I've improved have lists of works. Also, my content specialist in the fellowship class suggested that I add a list of important works to another article I was creating (Bette Korber). So I'd like to be consistent and keep Winzeler's selected works list in her article. Would you feel it was more appropriate if I cited fewer articles out of the many she's published? Or just ones with fewer authors? I'm pretty sure genomics research needs a big group but there are long lists of authors on some of her papers. I hope you can accept having this section reappear in some form. Thanks for considering this. LLMHoopes ( talk) 03:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Justlettersandnumbers,
Sorry, I'm fairly new to editing wikipedia, and have never had to deal with a copyvio/revdel issue before. I was hoping that you could give me some advice on the procedure for rewrites. An article I've been working on, Jim Towey, was apparently based on a foundational copyvio from 2010. The eight years of intermediate edits and my own extensive set of recent changes and additions have made it hard to tell, but I think I've managed to weed out all remaining traces of the original violation. I have a proposed rewrite up at Talk:Jim_Towey/Temp, and absolutely no idea what to do next.
Thank you, Genericusername57 ( talk) 04:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
On the page that I edited, you wrote the following, saying that there are copyright issues: "(copyvio blanking, foundational infringements of https://yellow.place/en/friends-of-tokai-park-cape-town-southafrica, https://www.pressreader.com/south-africa/cape-argus/20161128/281745563993432 and apparently some other source)" I don't even understand what any of this means, however there are no longer copyright issues. All I did was to update the links from the old ones to new ones. iSPOT migrated to iNaturalist. So why should this be a copyright problem? You didn't even give us a chance to fix the article according to Wikipedia's copyright rules, you simply blocked the page. Now I am a new user, and feel that this is a bit heavy handed. I'm also totally confused. Please see my talk page to show that all of the original articles now give access and allow external websites to use the content. If you are still not satisfied please explain clearly why. I would really appreciate an explanation (in simple English please, not Wiki jargon), and I would like to know if this issue can now be resolved please. Kind regards, Arebelo ( talk) 11:57, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For doing such a great job significantly cleaning up Elizabeth A. Winzeler, as well as the wonderful work you've been doing with your shiny new mop, dealing with copyright violations and deleting unwanted pages. SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 14:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hello Justletters and numbers. Could you take a look at my Edith Farmiloe page and tell me what I need to do to get it published. I have communicated as requested re my Lega Zambelli copyright issue but I have had no comeback. Regards etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adelphi14 ( talk • contribs) 12:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Could you take a glance at ticket:2018110210006552 ?
The good news is that there is a potential replacement article here: User:Ianwikramanayake/draft. The bad news is there is probably a conflict of interest so the replacement article would have to be reviewed enough so that you would feel comfortable with it. However, that might be easier than trying to tease out what needs to be cleaned out of the Problematic article,
Obviously, I could work on it as well but I noticed a jump in the backlog at OTRS and would prefer to work on the recent influx of requests.-- S Philbrick (Talk) 21:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
You may want to address this repeated violation. Regards -- Muhandes ( talk) 17:27, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I am sorry to bother you but I will need immediate semioprotection for my talkpage and Talk:DHX Media due to vandalism. Thank you. CLCStudent ( talk) 22:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
The offending copyrighted article was written by the same author as the editor who created the article. I've chatted with the author and they have agreed to release the text of the original source under CC. The original article ( http://www.ebritic.com/?p=703462) is now correctly licenced for use on wikipedia, and has a notice on the bottom of the article ("The text of this article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA), allowing anyone to share, distribute, transmit, and adapt it."). We should be good to go. Adding a note to that ref that it is CC would also be useful when restoring. Thanks very much. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 13:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
I know it's impatient of me to say this, and that you've said you wouldn't be the one to handle it, but it's been over a month since the copyright investigation for the summaries written in the List of Fairy Tail Zero episodes began. Since then, other editors have accepted and attributed it as "season 8" on related pages following my effort to retitle the page, improperly done as it was, which indirectly caused this whole debate. Not to mention, after the Japanese episode list template changed its coding weeks ago, all of the blanked material on the investigated article is displayed on the main List of Fairy Tail episodes article anyway. Because of the investigation notice, however, I've refrained from making any changes to the article to correct the display issue or rewrite any of the summaries. I've already provided attribution and made my case that the page has been subject to backwards copying, but I want to know if there's anything else I can do to resolve this. User:SubZeroSilver ( talk) 19:19, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
And we have WikiCommons for the Images. So shall I start to remove them? I love to... — Preceding unsigned comment added by FotoDutch ( talk • contribs) 16:07, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi ,is the Draft:Economic History of New Zealand still copyrighted?? I was considering accepting it but I see that the author added a big chunk of text into the draft after you cleaned out the copyright (12,000K text addition seems suspcious). I can't tell if he/she added copyrighted text to it (and I can't see the deleted revisions to compare the new text additions to the old text additions) can you tell me if it's still copyrighted?? Thanks JC7V -talk 03:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
New horse-related article: Gainsborough Stud. Looks like it needs some touch-ups; for instance, there was at least one date that wasn't verified and I just now had to add a citation that did. Any time you are able to spare would be appreciated. The article creator is a good-faith editor and a good researcher, however I'm not sure horses are at all his specialty. Thanks. Softlavender ( talk) 02:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello. It is interesting for me, why you deleted the page "Eldaniz Elman oglu Mammadov"? He is one of the young and famous Library and information science specialist and scientist in Azerbaijan, and well known in Iran, Turkey and Russian with his scientific articles. Whith this page we are going to show scientific articles of Eldaniz Mammadov's, of course with the consent of doctor E.Mammadov's. We have listed a list of his scientific works. This page is also available in Azerbaijani. https://az.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eld%C9%99niz_M%C9%99mm%C9%99dov_(f%C9%99ls%C9%99f%C9%99_doktoru) Now we are preparing this page in English. So please help me recover this page and do not delete this page. Eldaniz Mammadov's students need this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gulnar Ibrahimova-Mammadova ( talk • contribs) 22:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Irish Bull Terrier - I reworked the article, proposed a merge. When you catch a break, I'm interested in knowing what you think... Atsme ✍🏻 📧 04:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Dear Justlettersandnumbers, This open official appeal
my name is Bohdan Rodyuk Chekan von Miller
I am an artist and industrial designer
The article on English Wikipedia Olena Chekan now set for deletion
Olena Chekan is my beloved Mother
OLENA CHEKAN – The Quest for a Free Ukraine - Bohdan Rodyuk Chekan (Ed.) http://derkonterfei.com/product/olena-chekan-bohdan-rodyuk-chekan-ed https://ukrainianweek.com/Columns/50/154401 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYnhrOGjrM8 http://titel-kulturmagazin.net/2016/03/25/schlaglichter-auf-die-ukraine/
OLENA CHEKAN - Hymns to Ukrainian Art – Bohdan Rodyuk Chekan (Ed.) http://derkonterfei.com/product/olena-chekan-hymns-to-ukrainian-art-bohdan-rodyuk-chekan-ed http://ukrainianweek.com/Culture/163918 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLcMRP4BxFM
She was the illustrious political journalist, a glorified Soviet and Ukrainian actress, prominent screenwriter and courageous person: for the extension of her life during Euromaidan all Ukraine fought, my mother died in my arms 21 December 2013, Kiev, Ukraine, from glioblastoma - brain cancer, the fourth stage of 18 months of life - a lot, you can see the statistics of this disease. And if we are talking about freedom of speech of the media in Ukraine, who did more than my Mom
http://gorbaniewska.zawolnosc.eu/ru/inne/1 http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~sarmatia/916/916morebooks.pdf
Therefore, in memory of Mom and Svetolik Skale Mitić, I started a new project:
/info/en/?search=List_of_journalists_murdered_in_Ukraine this article is the beginning of a photo exhibition for future elections in Ukraine My project is intended to bring democratic changes to a ruined country engulfed by war and Russian aggression.
• Svetolik Skale Mitić is my first husband of my Mother you know of course that Svetolik Skale Mitić was one of the founders of journalism in the countries of the former Yugoslavia, Svetolik Skale Mitić sent letters to my Mom even from Nicaraguan captivity. I still keep his love correspondence with my Mom. https://www.svoboda.org/a/26285034.html
• General Yevgeny Miller is the father of my grandfather's brother's wife: CHEKAN (née MILLER) Maria Evgenievna, 1897-1982. Brother of my grandfather (my Mom's Father Vasily Ivanovich Chekan) - Protopresbyter archpriest Alexander Chekan (Chekan Alexander Ivanovich) (1893 - 1982) https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/4077462?counter=1 He took part in the Russian Civil War: In the Volunteer Army and VSYUR Don Army in the 1st separate heavy howitzer division; since Aug. 28 1919 Second Lieutenant, since 30 Sep. (The Lieutenant). In the Russian Army before the evacuation of the Crimea - Siege of Perekop (1920). Staff-captain. He participated in the Gallipoli Campaign. Alexander Chekan was injured and dying from wounds, he was saved by a nurse - the future wife Maria Evgenievna, the daughter of the general Yevgeny Miller. Alexander Chekan continued to defend the Motherland on Dec. 18 1920 in the 1st battery of the 5th Artillery Battalion. He with his wife emigrated to Bulgaria (1921). He received his higher education in Sofia, where he was also the secretary of the branch of the Russian Student Christian Movement (RSCM). Chairman of the Union of Russian Students in Sofia and the Union of Russian Students in Bulgaria (1920s). Later they moved to France. Since 1947, Alexander Chekan the second priest, then the abbot of the Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Paris.
• my uncle - Jerzy Bogdanowićz Polish theoretical nuclear physics scientist, Prof.Bogdanowićz participated in the scientific activities of the Large Hadron Collider: http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/other/sissa-3-94-ep.pdf http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988NuPhA.479..323B project in CERN and was nominated for the Nobel Prize. Jerzy Bogdanowićz - in young age the hero of Warsaw Ghetto Uprising and was awarded with The Order of Polonia Restituta (Polish: Order Odrodzenia Polski, English: Order of the Rebirth of Poland) and The Cross of Merit (Polish: Krzyż Zasługi). at his funeral in 1999, which I attended with my Mother Olena Chekan there was the red white roses wreath from the President of Poland Aleksander Kwaśniewski.
• my mentor, a close friend of my Mother - Alex Moscovitch was a French politician and analyst. He was also an associate and companion of General Charles de Gaulle. We met in Moscow 1990, when my Mom was creating an interview book "The Star of Alex Moscovitch | Etoile d'Alex Moscovitch" based on regular tape recordings of conversations with Alex Moscovitch. The book-interview was published in Moscow at publishing house "NORD" 14 September 1992 with the autobiography of Alex Moscovitch "Le Temps Des Punaises" in Russian. Two years spent together with Alex Moscovitch became for me a school of life and experience that formed me. Alex Moscovitch photos on the Wikipedia page from my archive at home! I found this article and put it on his page too https://www.lemonde.fr/culture/article/2011/10/17/17-octobre-1961-toute-une-histoire_1587334_3246.html
The layout of the interview book "The Star of Alex Moscovitch | Etoile d'Alex Moscovitch" by Olena Chekan was created by my Father Stanyslas Rodyuk Master builder M.Arch. Ukrainian architect, founder of the principles of the use of fractal properties in the parametric architecture of postmodernism and urban planing in the USSR and Ukraine https://www.flickr.com/photos/155931501@N04/41187636625/in/album-72157691957163572/
• Stanyslas Rodyuk (born 24 November 1937; died 15 February 2003) was the author of the idea, creator of planning design and the developer of the architectural project of the building of The Druzhba Sanitarium in Yalta that is located on the Crimea peninsula, Ukraine, at present Russia in the Greater Yalta district. His aesthetic vision of planning was that of parametricism in urban architecture and embodied in the main promises of modernism: public space, light and a sense of opportunity.In connection with his political views, Stanyslas Rodyuk was suspended from completion of the building of The Druzhba Sanitarium in Yalta by the architect project leader Igor Vasilevsky - a son of a Marshal of the Soviet Union – Aleksandr Vasilevsky. Stanyslas Rodyuk died of left lung pneumonia caused by tumor load of sarcoma 15 February 2003. The Druzhba Sanitarium in Yalta [1] is recognized as the best architectural project in the history of all Soviet Modernist Urban planning [2] [3].
I knew these people personally! They are my family! at home I have a huge archive of their photos, letters and personal veshey
Yes, in creating these articles I acted as an amateur. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Your_first_article I independently learned and mastered the skills of working in HTML to create these articles in Wikipedia As I know one of the Wikipedia principles: make help this article better /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles
But by destroying and correcting with the lack of truth these articles (none of you personally knew them!), Wikipedia destroy the truth of history.. it is against the right to freedom of opinion and expression, AI and digital security could https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomOpinion/Pages/OpinionIndex.aspx
https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G17/071/20/PDF/G1707120.pdf?OpenElement
https://news.un.org/en/audio/2018/10/1023932
I know that during a global catastrophe Wikipedia users will be encouraged to print all articles on available printers to preserve the history of Mankind, but what we will print if the historical truth of the Wikipedia articles will be lost forever? I please you not to turn Wikipedia into a copy-paste which is published under dictation «1984» Big Brother, it is unacceptable to turn Wikipedia into a fence with graffiti that is constantly being broken by anyone who wants.
We can join forces: the professional skills of all Wikipedia administrators and editing area Users with the historical documents archive, that I saved for these articles with documentary confirmed sources of external links.
I bid you, all Wikipedia administrators and editing area Users my hand of friendship and open heart! We can make these articles, about which I am writing in my appeal and the whole of Wikipedia better: Let`s do it! Together! T∴ A∴ F∴ Cordially, Bohdan Rodyuk Chekan von Miller Esq. Gauaren erregina ( talk) 16:32 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you reported the page Resham Dankh for speedy deletion due to copyright infringement. If you would kindly restore the page to the deleted version, or even move it to a Draft section, I'll rephrase everything in my own words. I was considerably busy and copied only a major part of ONE section. Everything else was proper. Thanks. SerTanmay ( talk) 17:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments on this article, but I would have thought that an article defining a general (financial) term was key to Wikipedia. I previously included numerous references to ACH Systems around the world ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Automated_Clearing_House#ACH_systems_around_the_world), but regrettably another editor removed those references. I will restore those references and add "see also's" for external information describing or making use of this generic term. Beyond that, if you can provide some advice, I'd appreciate it. Jedison brussels ( talk) 15:29, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
You have revdel’d content from The Scoots due to apparent RD1 violation from http://wiki.southparkstudios.co.uk/wiki/The_Scoots. This is blatantly false. The content of the site in question was copied from the WP article here, not the other way around. The article The Scoots was independently written by experienced editors including myself. Please immediately revert your deleted content and restore the page. Thank you. - SanAnMan ( talk) 15:51, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Regarding the deletion of the page for Penelope Trappes: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Penelope_Trappes&action=edit&redlink=1
The bio on Spotify that was cited as copyright infringement was written by me, manger of Penelope, with help from Penelope Trappes herself. We put the bio on Spotify and Wikipedia the same week (perhaps even the same day), as spotify allows managers to change their artists' bio. I am also the photographer who took the photos under the name Agnes Haus. I, and Penelope, are 100% ok with the bio being creative commons, copied, redistributed, changed, etc.. there is 100% no copyright infringement happening here.
Thank you! Flight005 ( talk) 18:44, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Agnes Haus is an alter ego of me, Stephen Hindman that i go under for art/management purposes (eg. photography/music management). I can refrain from editing The Golden Filter page. i didn't create it - but have in the past edited mostly discography bits so the page is more accurate - not sure if it's better to leave it as it was or keep it up to date (please advise?). As for paid disclosure, i don't get paid for this. Penelope and i are married and i haven't been paid to write bios. nor have i ever gotten a management fee, even though i "managge" aspects of the project. If it's possible to restore the skeleton of her page that would be great. perhaps someone else out there will fill in the information accurately. in an effort to prove i wrote the bio on spotify, and that i am Agnes Haus, i just put "-AH" at the end of the spotify bio:
https://open.spotify.com/artist/6shE4Y1z4lzRqoDp65XfzT/about . Either way, i completely respect keeping the integrity of Wikipedia, and really just kept the bio to the facts (no opinions). hope some of this helps, for better or worse. thanks!! --
Flight005 (
talk)
19:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Dear Justlettersandnumbers, thanks for cleaning up the Villa Romana Prize article today. I am relatively new in editing Wikipedia content, beginners mistakes ;-) Although I don’t get why you removed the added decade sub-categories in the receipient’s list? My opinion is, that the decade sub-categories would render the long list more legible. I also don’t understand your concerne regarding the three paragraphs of content (very skimpy) to be not neutral enough? It’s very descriptive, basic facts. Indeed, it could be improved grammatically, to much one-to-one translation from German. Thanks again dewilprj ( talk) 21:11, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Let me make this perfectly clear, as I thought I did in my edit summary, all I did was fix a list defined reference error that had been in the article since November 15. I have been working on clearing out a massive backlog at Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting, which is where this article - Maronesa - was listed at. All I did was comment the ref out, so if need be, it could be returned to the article if desired, as you apparently desire. I'm not involved in a content dispute on this article. However, if this article should ever appear in this category again in the near future, I will promptly ignore it. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 11:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm writing in regards to your report and subsequent deletion of the Gerovital Cosmetics draft.
You mentioned the issue was copyright violation, although I had no time to edit my draft regarding this, nor any indication as to which content was not appropriately reproduced. Furthermore, this issue was not reported initially by user theroadislong, with which I was working toward a final and complete version of the article. Since it was now deleted, I would like to know what steps I can take to rectify the issue, and if there is any way I could receive indications as to which content was infringing copyright.
Thanks! RazPalea ( talk) 11:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Please, be as kind as to let me know if you have an answer to my previous question. I would like to resume working on the article, and I need to know if you have any mentions regarding the copyvio you signaled.
Thanks! RazPalea ( talk) 11:30, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! RazPalea ( talk) 09:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for taking the time to review my COI edit request for Stash. Could you please clarify which parts of the request were objectionable so I can revise accordingly? Thanks! Mary Gaulke ( talk) 15:43, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
Elisa Rolle's articles". Thank you.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
11:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Please see Pure Storage - OTRS Ticket#2018110210006552 - Atsme ✍🏻 📧 00:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
I reversed your draftification of Sarah Binder. It was a bad decision: the article is adequately sourced, and very clearly meets WP:PROF (election to the American Academy is a selective honor of the type that meets #C3). — David Eppstein ( talk) 23:42, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi JLAN, thank you for your edits on this new article. I was reviewing its nomination for a DYK here and was concerned that there might be copyvios because some of the wording was too close to the original. Its seems I was right. I see it's been further edited since you removed visibility of copyright content. Could you take another look at that and let me know if you are content that it now okay. I really don't want to pass this for the front page if it breaches copyright. Bermicourt ( talk) 15:12, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
I voted at your (justified) Afd nomination of the above article, and quickly fixed a few things on the page. I think the main editor of the page has competency issues as a) they reverted my edits to create this version, and b) after I suggested they not edit until they learned how to, they contacted me directly with a cryptic email that began:
... but they have been editing since 2009. Just making a note of this as I saw your repeated requests for basic info on their page. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 16:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi JLAN, by coincidence I happened to be reviewing this one in the last couple of days and have not approved it because the images appear to violate copyright. Again, I'm no expert and would welcome a second opinion. Bermicourt ( talk) 17:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Can you take a look at this article, Pericle Fazzini, I noticed that you had reverted some earlier edits and it appears the same user has removed a large chunk of references (5 total), seen here. Apparently they prefer their own references. Article was, and still is, listed at Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting, where I ran across it. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 13:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
So, I guess Wikipedia is tougher about copyright issues than other issues? I ask because I've started other articles on Wikipedia that had problems for YEARS, yet u took 1 down for copyright issues, w/out even giving me 24 hours notice (article on George Grimm [Buddhist scholar])! If it's that important, then fine, I guess, but it seems pretty cold on this end. Put much more work into that than any article I've ever started on Wikipedia. Work I'll now have to do ALL OVER AGAIN, since the article is completely gone w/out a trace of it's ever having existed. Guess I should have saved it in a separate spot. Slarty1 ( talk) 21:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I would very much appreciate Any form of my article. I've put SO MUCH work into it. Most of my 2nd attempt was substantially different from other sources, IMNSHO. This is getting to b a heartbreak for me. I really think this guy deserves an English article. Pretty Please/thanx in advance. Slarty1 ( talk) 00:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for checking the Mount Potts page. It looked like there was a long history some of which might have been saveable, which is why I didn't simply delete it myself, but it definitely needed some expert attention! Grutness... wha? 12:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi JLAN. I don't think our paths crossed much before you became a sysop, but through your sysop interests (COPYVIO) and my maintenance interests (NPP) our paths have crossed since then. I admit to being a bit puzzled by your approach to copyright and was hoping I could gain more insight. I have noticed several times I have tagged something as G12 and where it seemed like there was a good to strong claim of notability rather than deleting it you placed the investigations template. I admit to not knowing a ton about that process, but do things get handled fast enough that this is truly better than performing the deletion? Since I could understand the logic of your actions there, even if it is out of step with other sysops, I hadn't asked questions before. However, your templating of Giovanni Parmigiani confuses me. I spent some real time to look for possible copyright issues and to remove those from the article. I also ensured that citations which were being used in the middle of the copied text were kept in the article and otherwise tagged both large problems (copyedit, an unreferenced section) and specific (more detailed claims which could use an in-line citation). Why was this not enough that you then felt the need to template the article? Should I, in your thinking, just be applying that template to places where I would be using G11 or requesting revdel when doing NPP? Thanks and Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:13, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi. There seems to be an issue with the RevDel request function. I can no longer give the beginning and ending changes. Onel5969 TT me 16:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
{{copyvio-revdel
|url =
|start =
|end =
}}
.Hello, I did a rewrite to the David E Shaner article and place it at Talk:David E. Shaner/Temp. I also made a note on the David E Shaner talk page. Please let me know if there is anything else I should do to have the copyright concerns reviewed.
thank you
Ptarry ( talk) 00:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Where is my Briar Nolet Draft- It took me ages to write and now I can't find it. Please send it to me so I can edit it to perfection. DOnt let my hardwork go to waste — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danceawe ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, You deleted a photo I up loaded (Alina von Davier) for copyright violation, but I am the copyright holder. I set the copyright to CC w/ attribution, but the file was deleted anyway. I would like to use the photo you deleted fro her biographical entry. Please advise on how to replace photo. Cantineac ( talk) 18:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Saturnalia | |
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC) |
Thank you for your notes on several of my additions yesterday - I'm a rookie at this and not yet 100% aware of the rules... no excuse, but it won't happen again... Lenny -- Lennycampello ( talk) 20:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas from London, JLAN ...
and a New Year filled with peace and happiness (and grapes, tangerines, panettone, ricciarelli, pan d'oro, and ciocolattini).
Best wishes, Voceditenore ( talk) 08:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
My very best wishes to all for the holiday season and for the New Year. For family reasons I will be on Wikipedia only infrequently – if at all – for several days from now. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 10:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
I think the revision on the left here should be OK. I had reverted everything at that point, and added the tag in the next one. Home Lander ( talk) 22:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! |
Hello Justlettersandnumbers, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Hi Justlettersandnumbers, I saw you moved a page i created Osadolor Nate Asemota to Draft:Osadolor Nate Asemota because of a supposed copyright violation policy.
Kindly check https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Osadolor_Nate_Asemota For immediate considerations. Thanks Amosflash ( talk) 17:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 16:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
No personal connection sir, just doing a professional job as it deserve, I have publish couple of pages that meet the standard and guidelines of article creation.
Please help me and revert the page for review.
Thank you sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 18:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
I wasn't paid and can't be paid for it, I was able to reach out to their admin representative to initiate the process in other to be restored, I never wanted any of my created page being moved or deleted, this is almost 2 years I joined Wikipedia and have gain some experiences in page creation, the first thing I learned Is that the publisher must not relate or be a 3rd party to the person.
I simply contacted their admin team to send the process, maybe I didn't state it clearly initially, maybe because error in my sentences while explaining in details.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 19:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
The picture was taken by them, I just uploaded it on Wikimedia but didn't know how to fill the categories, that's why I ended up putting my name as the author, please I will edit it and add their team as the author
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 19:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
I hope you will attend to it as soon as possible sir,
Remain blessed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 03:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
I would like to protest your immediate deletion of Mark Biltz. Please it back either to the main article section or my user space and I will rewrite it. -- Omer Toledano ( talk) 05:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, PLease attend to my request, I will be grateful sir.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amosflash ( talk • contribs) 17:41, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Let me also know if I can republish or you help me on bringing it back, the only issue it had has been resolve to verify the copyright holder, the article is well arranged....Thank you Amosflash ( talk) 17:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Justlettersandnumbers,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
SkyGazer 512
Oh no, what did I do this time?
23:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy
New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Dear Justlettersandnumbers You deleted my article "Andrzej Sztando". You said: "16:13, 1 January 2019 Justlettersandnumbers (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Andrzej Sztando (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.ue.wroc.pl/pracownicy/andrzej_sztando.html) " But have you found that there is statement on this page: "All the content of this page is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0" ? This text is written in 3 places on this page. Is it not enough? Preparation of this article (references) took many hours of my work... Can you explain this situation and help me please? Can you undelete this please. Thank you. Iszop63 ( talk) 18:58, 1 January 2019 (UTC)