Hello, I am Casliber (which happens to be an unspaced version of my real name) and have been editing since May 2006, and an admin since March 2007. I am nominating myself for arbcom as I feel I have some attributes which may be of benefit to wikipedia in difficult cases.

My main role is as a contributor and coordinator of (hopefully) quality content; wikipedia excels in its opportunity and use of collaborative editing. No man editor is an island and the skills in various areas of putting pen to paper (or digital equivalent) that I have improved on since I have been here I have been impressed and grateful for. I have spent most time in areas which make use of collaborative editing; Featured Article, DYK and (to a lesser extent) Good Article writing, as well as involvement with various wikiprojects (Fungi, Dinosaurs, Birds, D&D, medicine, some sports etc.), and have thought of ways of how to bring out the best in people with respect to article writing and improvement.

Now in my day job I am a psychiatrist and part of my job/role/skill-set/training etc. involves listening and watching and figuring out things like whether people are able to negotiate and collaborate with others, and if/how they can assume responsibility.

I figure experience in both of these areas may be useful in analysing difficult cases in how firmly to apply remedies or when to cut some slack in figuring out what is ultimately best for the 'pedia and how to get the best out of users.

Another point I'd like to make is that doctors generally shouldn't treat themselves or their families; the analogy here is arbcom. Many currently involved, and seeking to get elected have been involved for some time. This is a good thing and I fully support their involvement. However, I do think the committee may benefit from some experienced wikipedians who may not have been heavily involved and are hence more able to make objective observations and recommendations in some cases where arbcom members may be involved or a particular case is critical of some aspect integral to arbcom in some way.

Thus, if folks feel this is a benefit, I am happy to serve. If people feel all candidates should be heavily experienced, then so be it. Ask away.

• Casliber ( talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Questions for the candidate
• Discuss the candidate
• Support or Oppose this candidate

Voting in this election is now closed. Any votes cast after 00:00 15 December 2008 (UTC) will be reverted.

1. Privatemusings ( talk) 00:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
2. Cool Hand Luke 00:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
3. -- Maxim _(talk) 00:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
4. Support. Antandrus (talk) 00:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
5. Support Captain panda 00:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
6. -- Kanonkas :  Talk  00:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
7. Cla68 ( talk) 00:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
8. Black Kite 00:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
9. Sluzzelin talk 00:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
10. Support -- maclean 00:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
11. Seraphim ♥ 00:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
12. ~the editorofthewiki ^{( talk/ contribs/ editor review)}~ 00:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
13. Support Tom B ( talk) 00:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
14. Strongest support — Cyclonenim ( talk · contribs · email) 00:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
15. Support Perhaps a head doctor is what we need around here! JodyB _talk 02:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
16. Rationale. Giggy ( talk) 00:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
17. ~  priyanath  ^talk 00:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
18. Support. Mathsci ( talk) 00:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
19. Support per User:SandyGeorgia/ArbVotes. Jehochman ^Talk 00:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
20. Support SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 00:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
21. Support - Shot info ( talk) 00:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
22. Strong Support A fair, level-headed contributor who resolves conflict well and whom I trust to put their considerable expertise and experience to work for the betterment of the project. Steven Walling (talk) 00:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
23. iride scent 00:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
24. – Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 00:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
25. -- PeaceNT ( talk) 00:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
26. krimpet ✽ 00:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
27. -- Mattinbgn\ ^talk 00:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
28. PhilKnight ( talk) 01:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
29. Support - I would like to add that I would support you for multiple positions at ArbCom at the same time. :P Ottava Rima ( talk) 01:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
30. Support Sam ^Blab 01:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
31. Support Majorly ^talk 01:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
32. I like Casliber, I think he's very bright, it would be very interesting to have a psychiatrist on the Arbitration Committee and all in all I have hopes that he will do a great job. His lack of familiarity with the issues before the committee does concern me, and I found it very strange that he set up a straw poll on the contents of his signature. But, on balance, a support. Avruch ^T 01:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
33. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
34. — Locke Cole • t • c 01:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
35. Despite some concerns, I think Cas would be a net benefit to arb. Gimmetrow 01:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
36. Protonk ( talk) 01:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
37. Strong support has strong understanding of the basics. AC makes articlewriters more inclined to write, I think. YellowMonkey ( click here to choose Australia's next top model) 01:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
38. See reasoning. east718 01:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
39. I had made a list of people who I would be find with (though not necessarily in top 7) on ArbCom and this candidate was one of those people. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me} _{My work} 01:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
40. Graham 87 01:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
41. iMatthew 01:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
42. --- Euryalus ( talk) 01:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
43. — CharlotteWebb 01:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
44. Support: Perhalps one of the most talent, balanced and charasmatic editors we have seen on wikipedia. His contribs are just amazing. Ceoil ( talk) 01:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
45. Dedicated to the encyclopedia part of the project. Agne ^Cheese/ ^Wine 01:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
46. Great user! Great helper :D -- Mixwell! ^Talk 02:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
47. Atmoz ( talk) 02:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
48. Possibly the strongest support for anyone I will vote for. All around good contributor and colleague. Sincerely, -- A Nobody ^{My talk} 02:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
49. ~ Riana ⁂ 02:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
50. Though the mainspace needs you. John Reaves 02:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
51. Support yes. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
52. Support Kingturtle ( talk) 02:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
53. L'Aquatique talk 02:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
54. Never previously heard of this editor, but seems well qualified, certainly enough to be given a chance at this. And a trained psychiatrist no less ... that shouldn't do any harm! Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk) 02:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
55. Daniel ( talk) 02:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
56. Support. rootology ( C)( T) 02:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
57. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 02:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
58. John Vandenberg ^{( chat)} 03:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
59. Tentative support. Prodego ^talk 03:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
60. Gtstricky ^{Talk or C} 03:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
61. Support Strong candidate, mature outlook and even temperament, good demonstrated abilities in conflict resolution and taking the heat out of situations, unquestionably part of the community - all things ArbCom needs right now. I hope it doesn't affect his excellent mainspace contribs too much though :( Orderinchaos 03:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
62. Epbr123 ( talk) 03:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
63. David Shankbone 03:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
64. Has a calm demeanor suited for an arbitrator. Royal broil 03:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
65. Support BJ ^Talk 04:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
66. Support Eusebeus ( talk) 04:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
67. Casliber is a well-rounded editor and knows much of the site in and out - he would likely bring an educated and intelligent perspective to ArbCom. Master&Expert ( Talk) 04:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
68. I heartily endorse this product and/or service. Short Brigade Harvester Boris ( talk) 04:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
69. Strongest support, an ideal candidate-the highest competency with everything that matters, patient, diligent, gets the project. -- JayHenry ( talk) 04:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
70. Support. Would make a good arb. -- Alecmconroy ( talk) 04:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply

    upgrade to Strong Support per my radical manifesto wherein I pledge to support those elected -- Alecmconroy ( talk) 23:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply

71. Mike H. Fierce! 04:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
72. Support ^Law _shoot! 05:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
73. Support. Everyking ( talk) 05:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
74. Support as fellow DYK reviewer. Haven't seen this guy lose his head there, and there are opportunities. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
75. – Outriggr  § 05:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
76. Support. Seems to have his head on straight, has been fair whenever I've run into him, and I think he'd do a fine job. ··· 日本穣 ^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 06:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
77. Support. ( rationale) rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 06:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
78. Yeah, OK. MER-C 06:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
79. Support. Cirt ( talk) 07:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
80. Support Graham Colm ^Talk 07:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
81. – Moondyne 07:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
82. Support. — Athaenara ✉ 07:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
83. Strong support لenna vecia 07:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
84. — sephiroth bcr ^{( converse)} 07:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
85. Davewild ( talk) 08:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
86. -- Avi ( talk) 08:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
87. Support Ironholds ( talk) 08:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
88. Support Likely to get stuff done, and get it done well. Pedro :  Chat  08:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
89. Support. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
90. Strong support, sensible stance on BLP and ArbCom's role, exactly what we need right now. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
91. -- Aqwis ( talk – contributions) 09:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
92. Strong support per stance on BLP indicated in Lar's questions Fritzpoll ( talk) 09:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
93. — Dark ^talk 09:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
94. Strongest possible support. - The only negative that could possibly come from this person sitting on ArbCom would be a slightly lower article development level of activity. I think that's a reasonable tradeoff for such an obviously thoughtful and careful addition to the committee; contributing to a better environment on WP will necessarily attract more good editors. // roux    editor review09:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
95. Support Avenue ( talk) 09:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
96. Support Wildhartlivie ( talk) 09:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
97. Oldelpaso ( talk) 10:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
98. Support Very pleasant interaction despite occasionally opposite views. – sgeureka ^{t• c} 10:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
99. Stifle ( talk) 10:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
100. — neuro ^(talk) 10:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
101. Absolutely. PeterSymonds ( talk) 10:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
102. Support - Mr Bungle | talk 10:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
103. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this message! - 10:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
104. Very sane. Tombomp ( talk/ contribs) 11:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
105. Support - With the condition that he continues his great article work. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 11:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
106. Support with the hope that his article work does not suffer. Woody ( talk) 12:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
107. Support Jayen 466 12:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
108. Good chap. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 12:41, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
109. Support See my reasons in User:Secret/ArbCom. Note if there isn't a comment on the candidate there, I was on vacation and couldn't edit the past weekend, will leave one today. Secret ^account 12:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
110. Support Everything about him sounds good. Sticky Parkin 13:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
111. Support -- CrohnieGal ^Talk 13:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
112. Support, even though his content contributions may diminish. [1] Kablammo ( talk) 14:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
113. -- Kbdank71 14:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
114. Support JoJan ( talk) 14:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
115. Support Colchicum ( talk) 15:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
116. Support PseudoOne ( talk) 15:14, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
117. Good judgment: hopefully a breath of fresh air. Moreschi ( talk) 15:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
118. Support Verbal chat 15:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
119. Support Helpful, thoughtful and voice of reasonful. But don't you dare slack off the mainspace work! -- Dweller ( talk) 15:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
120. Support-- Taprobanus ( talk) 15:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
121. Provisional support: good user, but I want a promise that you won't stop writing articles. Sceptre ^{( talk)} 16:07, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
122. Support -- Tikiwont ( talk) 16:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
123. Support, but please do keep contributing to the encyclopedia. — Gavia immer ( talk) 16:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
124. Support JeremyMcCracken ( talk) ( contribs) 16:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
125. I have complete confidence in Casliber. He is very trustworthy, experienced, and civil. Acalamari 17:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
126. Support I trust Casliber's judgement completely. I fully expect his excellent contributions to articles to continue as well, as I think that will provide the grounding that he (and other arbs) need to make sure they understand how the community works now. Karanacs ( talk) 17:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
127. Strong Support I'll be honest, I'd oppose just to keep him working on the articles (even if they're about shrooms). But we need to upgrade and improve Arbcomm, and Cas is the right person to do it. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 18:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
128. Hate to bureaucratize such a great content contributor, but his content work will give him excellent perspective on the Committee. Plus, he can help the Committee work through some of their Oedipal issues... :) MastCell  ^Talk 18:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
129. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 18:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
130.  Sandstein  19:00, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
131. Syn ergy 19:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
132. Support - sound responses and communication, background good addition to arbcom. Martinp ( talk) 19:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
133. Support, just don't leave DYK ! NVO ( talk) 19:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
134. Tiptoety ^talk 20:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
135. AGK 20:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
136. Support. I share the concerns of the FA crew on the opposition but I think he is capable of both. spryde | talk 20:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
137. As long as you promise not to overmedicate Giano ;) Pcap ping 20:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
138. Support Wetman ( talk) 21:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
139. Support Just look at his most-edited articles: vampire, lion, mental disorders and poisonous mushrooms. He's way more dangerous than Bishzilla! Franamax ( talk) 21:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
140. Support. Biophys ( talk) 21:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
141. Support -- Suntag ☼ 21:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
142. Support The Helpful One 21:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
143. Support Kafka Liz ( talk) 21:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
144. Support Like many others, I worry that his FA-related activities may lessen because of it, but one should not be prevented from "branching out" just because they are good at something else. JPG-GR ( talk) 22:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
145. Support if he keeps contributing. -- Patar knight - ^chat/ _{contributions} 22:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
146. Support ... Modernist ( talk) 22:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
147. Nousernamesleft ( talk) 22:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
148. Support. m acy 22:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
149. Support for a fair-minded and competent user, though I do note the concerns of the opposers regarding potential loss of content. Hopefully Cas will keep up his high-quality article work. Glass Cobra 22:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
150. Support - lots of relevant experience. Warofdreams talk 23:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
151. Support - both real-life and enWiki experience. Bearian ( talk) 23:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
152. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
153. BrianY ( talk) 23:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
154. Ryan shell ( talk) 00:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
155. support -- Nepaheshgar ( talk) 00:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
156. Caspian blue 01:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
157. -- Koji † 01:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
158. Alex fusco ⁵ 02:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
159. Support --- Larno ( talk) 02:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
160. Chensiyuan ( talk) 02:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
161. Support Nrswanson ( talk) 02:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
162. Support. Great candidate.-- Kubigula ( talk) 02:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
163. -- Moni3 ( talk) 03:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
164. Support. Khoi khoi 03:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
165. Strong support. I'm only supporting a handful of candidates. I'm only "strong supporting" one. check. Keeper ǀ 76 04:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
166. Hesperian 04:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
167. Support. I especially like the response to Sarcasticidealist's question #2. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth ( talk) 04:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
168. Certainly has the right focus (content not drama), although I'm concerned he may not be a heavily-engaged arbitrator. Skomorokh 04:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
169. Awesome candidate. It will be sad to have you do less article-writing though! Clayoquot ( talk | contribs) 04:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
170. Great answers, fair caring candidate. Yes. ѕwirlвoy  ₪ 04:45, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
171. Support Althought, can't wait for Scientologist to say something about the Psych Cabal...-- Cerejota ( talk) 05:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
172. Probably the best candidate running, though sadly I'm sure his article work would suffer. Guettarda ( talk) 06:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
173. Support Melburnian ( talk) 06:12, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
174. Support Kamek ( Koopa wizard!) 08:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
175. Support S B H arris 10:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
176. Best candidate this year. I hope your stellar article work won't suffer too much but you're just the sort of person we need to restore faith in the ArbCom so thanks for offering your help and good luck! EconomicsGuy ( talk) 11:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
177. I think so - support -- Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
178. ^S._D.D.J. Jameson 12:15, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
179. Support. I've interacted with Casliber on a few occasions and have always come away with a very positive impression. He's familiar with the ground level reality of Wikipedia and consistantly works towards cooperation and solutions. Vassyana ( talk) 12:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
180. Support-- Joopercoopers ( talk) 12:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
181. fish& karate 13:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
182. Bucketsofg 14:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
183. Support. I wasn't going to support any candidate I had no real knowledge of, but upon reading some of the praise doled out to Casliber, I decided to dig a little deeper. Everything I've read since leads me to believe Casliber is an excellent choice and will make an excellent Arb'. Steve ^{T • C} 14:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
184. Support -- Aude ( talk) 15:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
185. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 16:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
186. Support. Espresso Addict ( talk) 16:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
187. support. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Babakexorramdin ( talk • contribs) 16:31, 2 December 2008
188. Support Probably the candidate I'm most comfortable with. Pascal.Tesson ( talk) 16:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
189. Support. -- Steven Fruitsmaak ( Reply) 18:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
190. Support. Novickas ( talk) 18:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
191. Like the other guys say... Ecoleetage ( talk) 18:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
192. qp10qp ( talk) 18:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
193. Support. LLDMart ( talk) 19:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
194. Support.- gadfium 19:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
195. - filelake shoe 19:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
196. Support The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
197. Support - I trust Comrade Boris. -- Stephan Schulz ( talk) 21:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
198. Support More than deserves it, but I hope we won't lose all the excellent article contributions. Joe Nu tter 21:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
199. Support seems suitable - good luck! -- Cameron Scott ( talk) 22:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
200. -- Sultec ( talk) 22:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
201. Support -- Step hen 23:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
202. Support - Chris ( talk) 00:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
203. IronDuke 00:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
204. support Gnan garra 00:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
205. jpgordon ^∇∆∇∆ 01:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
206. Support -- CreazySuit ( talk) 01:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
207. Support faithless (^speak) 02:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
208. I wasn't originally going to vote, as I am a fellow candidate this election. But you know, we agree on quite a bit based on arbcom cases we've both been involved in, you're an amazing content contributor, and I can't hold off supporting you any longer :) Wizardman 03:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
209. Couldn't think of a better candidate.   Marlith (Talk)  03:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
210. Support per GlassCobra. -- Raayen ( talk) 03:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
211. Support - good candidate Nokhodi ( talk) 03:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
212. Support per Steven Walling. -- MagneticFlux ( talk) 05:21, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
213. Casliber has got real clue and has his mind in exactly the right place when it comes to this project. — Anonymous Dissident ^Talk 05:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
214. - auburnpilot  talk 06:16, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
215. Support N p holmes ( talk) 07:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
216. Support Badger Drink ( talk) 08:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
217. DrKiernan ( talk) 09:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
218. Support - very trustworthy above others. -- Marianian ( talk) 09:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
219. Kusma ( talk) 12:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
220. I support. Dark and stormy knight ( talk) 13:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
221. Kauffner ( talk) 14:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
222. Support. TBH Cas I was hoping for a longer reply to my question. I'm still not entirely convinced your cheerful nature won't take a drubbing on the committee. But you have the intelligence, the fair-mindedness, and the mainspace contributions we need in an ARB. It looks like you're already through, so good luck. Marskell ( talk) 15:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
223. Support Tundrabuggy ( talk) 15:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
224. Terence ( talk) 16:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
225. Support — αἰτίας • discussion• 16:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
226. Support. A very sound candidate. -- ChrisO ( talk) 18:33, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
227. Support Hiberniantears ( talk) 18:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
228. Support - Tājik ( talk) 19:33, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
229. Michael Snow ( talk) 20:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
230. Support. -- jbmurray ( talk • contribs) 21:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
231. Support. -- Banjeboi 22:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
232. Support. I really hate voting, but I can't imagine anything nicer for Wiki than having this keen contributor and very friendly man helping to look after us. Full of good humour is Cas, a great contribution to ArbCom. Alastair Haines ( talk) 22:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
233. Support vi5in ^[talk] 23:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
234. sure, -- Jan eissfeldt ( talk) 00:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
235. Support -- Strong answers, good candidate. Mww113 (talk) 01:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
236. Support -- Cube lurker ( talk) 01:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
237. Support. A strong foundational candidate..well grounded. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ( (⊕)) 02:18, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply

     Support -- cmelbye ( ^t/ _c) 03:12, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply

     Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 150 mainspace edits by November 1. ST47 ( talk) 04:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply

238. Support Always level headed and would be willing to carefully consider all sides of an issue before passing judgement. Always a good characteristic of an ArbCom member.-- Jayron32. talk. contribs 03:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
239. Support - Peripitus (Talk) 05:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
240. Support -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 07:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
241. Support -- Chapultepec ( talk) 08:25, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
242. Support dougweller ( talk) 13:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
243. Support -- Apoc2400 ( talk) 14:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
244. Support -- 157.228.x.x ( talk) 14:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
245. Support Impressive article work. A man in space ( talk) 14:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
246. Support Tony (talk) 16:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
247. Support. Baku87 ( talk) 17:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
248. Support Happy‑ melon 17:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
249. Support Carlosguitar  ^{(Yes Executor?)} 18:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
250. Support -- Tinu Cherian - 18:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
251. Support But please don't let Arbcom prevent you from producing/editing/helping create/maintain quality articles. Budding Journalist 18:48, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
252. Support L337* P4wn 19:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
253. Support -- Cactus.man ✍ 19:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
254. Support hbent ( talk) 19:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
255. Support Slrubenstein | Talk 20:09, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
256. Support YES. Poltair ( talk) 20:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply

     Support Per the rest. Please note this is a new account as the password on the old one ( User:Peter Damian) was lost. I have many 10's of thousands of edits on my old accounts so please accept this vote. Peter Damian II ( talk) 21:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply

     I'm sorry, your unblock terms do not allow you edit, or vote within this namespace.-- Tznkai ( talk) 03:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply

257. Support. A shoo-in. Guy ( Help!) 21:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
258. Support – interesting elements, assume wide experience in RL with relevant qualities, Julia Rossi ( talk) 22:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
259. Support' Decent enough choice I guess. ⇒ SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 23:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
260. TS 00:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
261. Support. Axl ¤ [Talk] 01:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
262. Support Though you'll have less time for FA level work.-- MONGO 02:17, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
263. Support Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 03:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
264. support JoshuaZ ( talk) 03:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
265. Crystal whacker ( My 2008 ArbCom votes) 04:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
266. Support -- VS ^talk 06:29, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
267. Support because of some of the reasons people casted oppose votes (like it is a loss to content creators) Leujohn ^{( talk)}
268. Support. One of the most competent WP editors. Whenever I had the chance to talk with him, he was always calm, open-minded and constructive. I think he will be the kind of "judge" we need.-- Yannismarou ( talk) 14:06, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
269. Support. Warrington ( talk) 14:12, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
270. Support I know this editor/admin for more than a year, and I have no doubts that he will make a good arb. Ruslik ( talk) 14:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
271. Support. -- Hectorian ( talk) 14:47, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
272. Support. Strong editor, ready to contribute in a different way. You have my support. -- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
273. A good candidate to me. Full rationale: User:Camaron/Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008. Camaron | Chris (talk) 20:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
274. Pile-On Support. I have heard/seen nothing but good things from/about the CAS. Just don't allow the corrupt political culture of the ArbComm change you, but rather change it! R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) ( talk) 21:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
275. Yup •Jim62sch• ^dissera! 23:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
276. Support -- Samir 23:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
277. Strongest possible support - You are just incredible!!! @pple complain 00:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
278. Casliber's on-wiki and real life experience will serve ArbCom well. — Manti core 05:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
279. Wronkiew ( talk) 06:29, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply

     Wikisaver62 ( talk) 10:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply

     I'm sorry, you did not have 150 mainspace edits before November 1. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply

280. Support - EdJohnston ( talk) 15:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
281. Support - AdjustShift ( talk) 15:59, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
282. Support Wkdewey ( talk) 21:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
283. Support My experience—little of it direct, to my detriment, I imagine—with the candidate leads me to support, even as I am not quite thrilled with certain of the answers. I hope and trust, I should say, that Casliber's deliberative temperament and sound sense of judgment will lead him to be the arbitrator whom Seraphim and Fritz, for two, suppose that he will be vis-à-vis BLP. Joe 03:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
284. Support — BillC ^talk 03:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
285. Support - --- Buster7 ( talk) 04:16, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Communicates with clarity and conviction reply
286. Support Per my details. MBisanz ^talk 04:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
287. Support - SmthManly / ^ManlyTalk / ^{ManlyContribs} 04:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
288. Support Aunt Entropy ( talk) 05:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
289. Support - Shyam ^{( T/ C)} 08:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
290. Support =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
291. Support Jon513 ( talk) 16:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
292. Support No reason not to.-- Iamawesome 800 16:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
293. Support Likely to be ineffective as an arbitrator, which should hasten the death of Wikipedia. Kelly Martin 20:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
294. Support Giants2008 ( 17-14) 00:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
295. kur ykh 02:19, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
296. Support-- Regents Park ( bail out your boat) 03:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
297. Support Awadewit ( talk) 05:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
298. Support Very fair and knowledgeable user. – Alex43223 ^{T | C | E} 08:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
299. Support -- Peter cohen ( talk) 13:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
300. Support. — E ↗ 14:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
301. Support. He seems really good. Vancouver dreaming ( talk) 15:33, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
302. Good enough for me. Tex ( talk) 19:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
303. Support Shows strong willingness and ability to write and act in an impartial manner, to persevere in detailed investigations, and to ratiocinate complex situations. - Eldereft ( cont.) 20:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
304. Support. Willking1979 ( talk) 21:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
305. Support. Huldra ( talk) 21:52, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
306. Support Fangfufu ( talk) 02:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
307. Support per rationale at User:JayHenry/chimpmanzee. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 02:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
308. Support. Abyssal ( talk) 03:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
309. Weak support. A few of his answers are a little underwhelming, and it's not all together clear how transferable his dazzling article writing experience will be to Arbing, but seems generally quite sensible. Besides that, I have a bias towards editors with disclosed identities and real life experience and grown up responsibilities (despite meeting only the "disclosed identity" criterion myself). Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 05:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
310. Support A genuinely nice guy, which is apparent from the support he's getting. Cas and I don't agree on all issues, just the important ones. I believe he has extremely useful insights regarding the issues facing the wiki. Cheers, Jack Merridew 12:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
311. Support - excellent contributor at the coal-face as it were of what the project is ultimately about. Whilst several of answers been noted as weak, I am actually reassured that recognises limit of knowledge and not some tekkie who knows all possible aspects of past decissions. Coming afresh to the committee (other members will be able to point out relevant points) makes him a good choice of candidate as breath of types of arbcom members would be useful. Has clear writing style, open thinking processes, pragmatic, sensible and polite - ticks all the boxes for me... David Ruben ^Talk 14:56, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
312. Johnbod ( talk) 20:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
313. Support tgies ( talk) 04:42, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
314. Support. Parishan ( talk) 07:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply

     Support User: Marcos987 ( User talk:Marcos987) 07:21, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply

     Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. — neuro ^(talk) 13:23, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply

315. Support Gazi moff 13:53, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
316. Alun ( talk) 14:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
317. Support. A fair, open-minded candidate. Escellent contributions across the wiki. Rje ( talk) 20:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
318. Support Hús ö nd 21:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
319. Support Shyamal ( talk) 03:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
320. Support Amalthea 03:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
321. Support Shenme ( talk) 05:16, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
322. Support. - SusanLesch ( talk) 06:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
323. momoricks (make my day) 07:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
324. Support Rivertorch ( talk) 08:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
325. Support Candidate of the year. DGG ( talk) 15:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
326. Support-- Dacy69 ( talk) 16:30, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
327. Support I trust the candidate's judgement. SWik78 ( talk • contribs) 16:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
328. Support, not only on basis of good statement, but the fact that some folks I respect also favor the candidate. Having had no interactions myself w/ the editor, that seems like a fair metric. -- Jim Butler ( t) 17:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
329. Support Paranormal Skeptic ( talk) 21:23, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
330. Support ---- The Myotis ( talk) 21:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
331. Support His experience listening to people should prove very useful. -- Imperator3733 ( talk) 21:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
332. Support Finn Rindahl ( talk) 02:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
333. Support miranda 09:09, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
334. I took a number of factors into consideration - to specify a few: keen willingness to learn, good answers to my questions (although they fell short in Questions 1c, 2 and a few parts in 4), and no concerns with timeliness (except in answering Question 4). A lack of directness in a few responses may be an issue, but I am trusting that this user will make attempts to resolve this concern with time. At the conclusion of my analysis, I ranked this candidate somewhere in the top 8. Support. Ncmvocalist ( talk) 10:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
335. Support Knows how to disagree without being disagreeable. Haiduc ( talk) 11:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
336. Support Grand master 12:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
337. Support, seen around doing useful thoughtful work in reslolving disputes, answers interesting and good. . dave souza, talk 12:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
338. Support ( Quentin X ( talk) 15:29, 12 December 2008 (UTC)) reply
339. Support Per Kelly Martin I can't wait to enjoy the end. ILovePlankton ( talk) 17:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
340. Support User has been around since May 2006 and track is outstanding.Liked the way he supported a candidate in a RFA with whom he had disagreed.Further as per User:JayHenry/chimpmanzee. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 18:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
341. Support - I don't agree with SandyGeorge that all the candidates need to necessarily have extensive recent work on content, but this who I feel I can support Nil Einne ( talk) 21:34, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
342. Jitse Niesen ( talk) 21:37, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
343. Support - Dureo ( talk) 21:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
344. Yes Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
345. -- MPerel 00:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
346. Support. Looks pretty good, although I would have like to see more decisive answers and stands on some controversial issues. It seems clear that you will be elected to ArbCom. While serving there, please remember that ArbCom is there to resolve disputes, usually the most nasty and unpleasant ones. This means that often pretty decisive measures will be needed, and a fireside chat with the concerned parties will usually not be sufficient. Nsk92 ( talk) 01:57, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
347. Support Narutolovehinata5 ^{t c csd new} 04:33, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
348. Support Sure. -- Xp54321 ^{( Hello! • Contribs)} 06:05, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
349. Support. I have seen nothing but good things from/about Casliber. -- Kaaveh ( talk) 06:15, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
350. Support. Ateshi- Baghavan 11:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
351. Support per SandyGeorgia. Kelly ^hi! 16:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
352. Support Switzpaw ( talk) 22:36, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
353. support E104421 ( talk) 23:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
354. Support - Xasha ( talk) 23:55, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply
355. Support – Have had good interactions with Casliber. I'm sure he'll make a fine member of the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee. – RyanCross ( talk) 01:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
356. Support. alanyst ^{/ talk/} 04:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
357. Support Ariel ♥ Gold 04:59, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
358. Support. — xaosflux ^Talk 05:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
359. Support. A good and sound candidate. -- Anish ( talk) 06:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
360. Support, solid candidate, but I echo the article production concerns. Titoxd^{( ?!? - cool stuff)} 07:33, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
361. Support - -- Roisterer ( talk) 11:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
362. Support -- Peter Andersen ( talk) 11:22, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
363. Support Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 14:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
364. Support Sunray ( talk) 19:51, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
365. SQL ^{Query me!} 20:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
366. Support -- lucasbfr ^talk 20:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
367. Support Alexius Horatius 21:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
368. Support   jj137 (talk) 22:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
369. Support Orlady ( talk) 22:39, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
370. Support EJF ( talk) 23:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
371. Support Sarah 23:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
372. Per User:Lar/ACE2008 ++ Lar: t/ c 23:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
373. Support  JGHowes  ^talk 23:39, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
374. Support. Thanks, SqueakBox 23:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
375. Support ( rationale). the wub "?!" 23:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
376. Support – Waltham, The Duke of 23:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
377. RMHED ( talk) 23:59, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply

1. Oppose. Rschen7754 ( T C) 00:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
2. Nufy8 ( talk) 00:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
3. Dlabtot ( talk) 00:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
4. Voyaging ^(talk) 00:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
5. I fear we will lose Casliber's prolific Banksia/fairy wren/dinosaur/random animal FA production if he is elected to the AC. Also, a bit too unfamiliar with the committee's dealings for my liking. Nishkid64 _{( Make articles, not wikidrama)} 01:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
6. Nothing personal, but I chose a group I want to win. Good luck though. RockManQ ^{Review me} 01:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
7. Oppose because I'd rather have Cas continue his excellent featured work than have him get sidelined and end up with enemies. The articles need you more than the 'cracy! -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^{( talk)} 02:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
8. ArbCom must be disbanded and replaced with a system which actually works. Sorry, I oppose. Bstone ( talk) 02:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
9. Rjd0060 ( talk) 03:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
10. All things to all men. Too nice, and too many politicians' answers.-- Scott MacDonald ( talk) 10:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
11. David Fuchs sums up my concerns well. Mackensen (talk) 11:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
12. He deserves better. Dengero ( talk) 15:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
13. Extremely, extremely, good user. That about sums it up, since his content is too good to lose. — Ceran ♦ ♦ ( speak) 22:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
14. Oppose. Миша 13 22:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply

    Oppose - Either 1) is unwilling to cast even the slightest amount of criticism towards potential future colleagues, or 2) takes a nice long while to answer questions, or 3) feels that the ArbCom has never made a mistake and has no thoughts on the ArbCom RFC. So, the candidate, for all his wonderful mainspace qualities (and there are lots!) is either 1) political to a fault, 2) a bit too prone to C68-SV-FM style inactivity, or 3) brain damaged. The mainspace contributions should rule out possibility #3, which leaves what is likely a mixture of #1 and #2. Neither of those possibilities are compatible with a seat on the already slow-moving, politics-besotted ArbCom. Badger Drink ( talk) 23:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Moving to support per Talk conversation Badger Drink ( talk) 08:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply

15. Oppose. Different people have different strengths, and I feel that Casliber's strengths do not lie in the realm of ArbCom mediation. bibliomaniac 1 5 00:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply

    This is my first oppose in the two ArbCom elections for which I've been eligible, and I hate to register it, but (since it won't matter anyway) this candidate is simply too congenitally noncommittal to be an effective member of the committee. Deor ( talk) 03:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC) With considerable embarrassment, I'm withdrawing my vote. I had the nominee confused with someone else. Deor ( talk) 17:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply

16. Phil Sandifer ( talk) 03:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
17. Gentgeen ( talk) 10:04, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply

    Oppose Max ( talk) 10:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply

    You are not eligible to vote as you have fewer than 150 mainspace edits Fritzpoll ( talk) 10:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply

18. oppose. log; G.4 William M. Connolley ( talk) 22:18, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
19. Oppose. Seems to want to apply the absolute standard of confidentiality present in medicine (where nobody else has any right to know the information) to arbcom evidence (where the person the evidence is being used against has an absolute right to know the information). Cynical ( talk) 22:20, 4 December 2008 (UTC) reply
20. Oppose Sorry, I have chosen other editors that better reflect my views. Diderot's dreams ( talk) 04:47, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
21. Article work isn't the carte blanche for arbitrators, saying that, it is of a high quality and losing that would be regretful. Caulde 11:54, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
22. Very strongly oppose. Saying that leaving a half-completed RfC around is just not on is unacceptable. More seriously, this candidate is the subject of a strong electioneering campaign; unless he pledged to recuse himself from all issues of interest to his sponsors, I could not, and do not, trust him. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
23. Oppose. See this spectacular answer to the question about nationalist edit warring. Jd2718 ( talk) 20:10, 6 December 2008 (UTC) reply
24. seresin (  ¡? )  00:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply

    Oppose He doesn't obey NPOV. He doesn't realize that Taiwan is part of China. Alonso McLaren ( talk) 01:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply

    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 150 mainspace edits by November 1. ST47 ( talk) 01:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply

25. Oppose   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 17:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
26. Oppose. Further comments available at my ACE2008 notes page. -- El on ka 19:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
27. Strong oppose based on answer to my question; nothing else really need to be said, the answer speaks for itself. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 20:27, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
28. The quality, breadth and diligence of this candidate's content output far outweigh the worth of his service as an arbitrator. The same could be said of several other candidates, but I am not as familiar with their work. ˉˉ ^anetode ╦╩ 05:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
29. Oppose Glib, but failure to unambiguously support fundamental policies such as Wikipedia:Civility. Fred Talk 02:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
30. Oppose, per his role in the TV episodes case. I don't want an arbitrator who regards pop-cruft cleanup as a disruptive activity. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
31. Oppose, as an assigned mentor of a serial harasser, I don't think it would be appropriate for Casliber to be an arbitrator in the least. ArbCom does not exist to hold the hands of and enable trolls. Although I feel free to say this since you're #1 in the running. -- Pixelface ( talk) 11:58, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
32. Oppose: Per comments at my RFA, Casliber doesn't quite grasp WP:NOT#DEMOCRACY. That's a pretty critical policy for someone who wants to be an Arbcom member.— Kww( talk) 21:22, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
33. Oppose. Mervyn Emrys ( talk) 17:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC) reply