Final: (93/1/2) - Closed as successful by Acalamari at 18:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Yaris678 ( talk · contribs) – Ladies and gentlemen, it's been a while since I've nominated anyone here, so I'm very pleased to have such an excellent candidate to present. Yaris is a generally uncontroversial, gnome-y type of person. He's been with us since the middle of 2008 and editing consistently ever since. The main thrust of his editing is in anti-vandalism, but he's a mathematician by training, which gives him quite an analytical outlook. In other words, he's not just a button-masher, he can also exercise intelligent judgement. Yaris would like to help out by blocking the occasional vandal and, once he's got some experience, perhaps evaluating consensus in RfCs and other areas.All in all, I think Yaris is exactly the type of admin we need—somebody humble, sensible, and with excellent judgement. You won't see him rushing in headlong and making a mess of things, but rather taking the time to quietly and carefully evaluate things and make the best decision possible. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
I don't understand the lack of understanding. The stated purposed of banning is to prevent that person from editing. But, it doesn't prevent anyone from editing. So, what actual purpose does it serve? Minorview ( talk) 23:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Yaris678 ( talk) 14:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC) reply
11. I saw the userbox on your userpage. Why are you always the negative one?
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
Final: (93/1/2) - Closed as successful by Acalamari at 18:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Yaris678 ( talk · contribs) – Ladies and gentlemen, it's been a while since I've nominated anyone here, so I'm very pleased to have such an excellent candidate to present. Yaris is a generally uncontroversial, gnome-y type of person. He's been with us since the middle of 2008 and editing consistently ever since. The main thrust of his editing is in anti-vandalism, but he's a mathematician by training, which gives him quite an analytical outlook. In other words, he's not just a button-masher, he can also exercise intelligent judgement. Yaris would like to help out by blocking the occasional vandal and, once he's got some experience, perhaps evaluating consensus in RfCs and other areas.All in all, I think Yaris is exactly the type of admin we need—somebody humble, sensible, and with excellent judgement. You won't see him rushing in headlong and making a mess of things, but rather taking the time to quietly and carefully evaluate things and make the best decision possible. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
I don't understand the lack of understanding. The stated purposed of banning is to prevent that person from editing. But, it doesn't prevent anyone from editing. So, what actual purpose does it serve? Minorview ( talk) 23:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC) reply
Yaris678 ( talk) 14:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC) reply
11. I saw the userbox on your userpage. Why are you always the negative one?
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |