|
Hi Jakob Coles! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC) |
|
Welcome back! :) — Yash talk stalk 00:55, 12 March 2017 (UTC) |
On 15 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nancy Run, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nancy Run in Northampton County, Pennsylvania, is named after an old fortune teller? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nancy Run. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Nancy Run), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Newsletter Nr 3 for
WikiProject Genealogy (and
Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
 Participation: This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Request: In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well as taking new, important steps towards a creation of a new project site, we need to make communication between the users easier and more effective. At Mail list on meta is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia email list. In order to request the creation of such a list, we need your voice and your vote. In order to create a new list, we need to put a request it in Phabricator, and add a link to reasoning/explanation of purpose, and link to community consensus. Therefore we need your vote for this now, so we can request the creation of the mail list. Read more about this email list at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project mail list where you can support the creation of the mail list with your vote, in case you haven't done so already. Future:
Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
Message added 22:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
New messages at the discussion. Sigh. North America 1000 22:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
| Newsletter Nr 4, 2017-03-24, for
WikiProject Genealogy (and
Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
Participation: This is the fourth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Mail list is created: The project email list is now created and ready to use! Please feel free to subscribe at https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-genealogy Future:
Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
Welcome back Jakob Coles. I noticed this new account while I was scrolling through GA nomination Talk:Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River). If you don't want the admin tools, maybe you should notify WP:BN. It's not like you're hiding; you have your own reasons for the new account name. But you really should formally get the old account taken care of. Wikipedia is treating it as an active account and I think there is the possibility of confusion later down the line. Anyway, good luck. — Maile ( talk) 00:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- @ Maile66: Thanks for the welcome. Seeing as I don't have the password anymore, what do you recommend be done with the old account. (I may have mentioned, but I'm no longer particularly interested in adminship.) Jakob ( talk) 02:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- I think the recommended procedure is to post at WP:BN and let them deal with the de-admin under the old account names. One thing that comes to mind is some hacker getting the tools and committing hanky-panky under your old name. Best wishes for your path forward. May you have nothing but blue skies ahead. — Maile ( talk) 11:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Polk Valley Run, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Poke Valley Run was reputedly named for its shite pokes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Polk Valley Run. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Polk Valley Run), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 12:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Congrats on that, but what is " scrub meadow"? — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 19:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
On 6 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black River (Saucon Creek), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Black River is a "miserable ditch"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black River (Saucon Creek). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Black River (Saucon Creek)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 00:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/The Big Bend at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk) 01:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
The Big Bend at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk) 22:30, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah ( talk) 21:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Kasson Brook, Jakob Coles!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for creating this. You've created 12 good articles, and once they're created, they go through review at New Page Patrol. Yours are too good to add to the large backlog there. Once you've created 25 articles, can you please go to WP:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled and ask for your articles to be autopatrolled? This will cut the backlog and mean your articles go straight onto Google instead of waiting up to 90 days.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 06:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jakob. I was following the recent thread at WP:BN with interest, and a thought struck me. As Jakec, did you ever use Special:EmailUser/Oversight to send an email to the oversight team ( User:Oversight)? (If you've ever requested oversight before, this is probably how you did it.) If so, we may be able to link your two accounts definitively if you still have access to the email address you used as Jakec. Mz7 ( talk) 05:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- @
Mz7: I have in fact emailed the oversight team a few times.
Jakob (
talk) 01:26, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- @
Jakob Coles: Go through your email's archive and see if you can find any responses from the oversight team. In the subject bar of the email there should be a 16-digit OTRS ticket number in brackets, e.g. [Ticket#1234567890123456]. Send an email with the same email address to the
functionaries mailing list (functionaries-en
lists.wikimedia.org) mentioning this ticket number and ask for a member of the oversight team to compare the email address listed in the OTRS ticket to the email you are currently using. If they match, they should be able to make an official statement over at
WP:BN verifying that your two accounts are linked. The reason this works is because when you used
Special:EmailUser/Oversight, the email was sent by the MediaWiki software under your Jakec Wikipedia account, not by your email client. As a result, the oversighters should be able to check the email headers and verify that the Jakec account used the same email address as you are now.
Mz7 (
talk) 06:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- @
Jakob Coles: Go through your email's archive and see if you can find any responses from the oversight team. In the subject bar of the email there should be a 16-digit OTRS ticket number in brackets, e.g. [Ticket#1234567890123456]. Send an email with the same email address to the
functionaries mailing list (functionaries-en
On 21 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Scouten Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that smut has been reported on Scouten Brook? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Scouten Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Scouten Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
IronGargoyle ( talk) 12:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
|
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 16:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
On 25 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Big Bend, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Big Bend, which would be the world's longest building if built, was designed to circumvent zoning regulations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Big Bend. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, The Big Bend), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 12:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
On 15 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Red Brook (Stony Brook), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a swamp in the watershed of Red Brook is home to part of the largest population of yellow-bellied flycatchers in Pennsylvania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Red Brook (Stony Brook). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Red Brook (Stony Brook)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 01:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River)
The article
Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk) 07:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
On 5 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Opossum Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that evidence of beavers was first detected on Opossum Brook in 1929 by a man on his way to Hell's Kitchen? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Opossum Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Opossum Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 00:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity (for User:Jakec)
Following a
community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to
provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the
Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the
re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at
WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. —
xaosflux
Talk 00:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, it's been that long, huh? Time flies, I guess. I've had a lot of fun writing articles here, but I don't think I'll be editing much anymore—I have a lot less free time now than I did in high school, and have by and large moved on to other things. Thanks anyway, and good luck with the project!
Jakob (
talk) 01:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Best wishes, should you wish to resume mopping please log in as User:Jakec and drop a note at WP:BN, alternatively have your other account request that the access be moved to this one if you will be using it (also at WP:BN). This will be available for just under 2 years, after which time you would need to request community approval at WP:RFA. — xaosflux Talk 02:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River tributary)
The article
Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River tributary) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River tributary) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Example --
Example (
talk) 05:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Jakob Coles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing
Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
<span style="background:brown">'''[[User:Jakob Coles|<font color="white">Jakob</font>]] ([[User talk:Jakob Coles|<font color="white">talk</font>]])'''</span>: Jakob ( talk)
to
<span style="background:brown">'''[[User:Jakob Coles|<span style="color: white;">Jakob</span>]] ([[User talk:Jakob Coles|<span style="color: white;">talk</span>]])'''</span>: Jakob ( talk)
Respectfully, Anomalocaris ( talk) 20:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. — Anomalocaris ( talk) 06:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, as a fellow-user of the GA process, I would like to invite you to consider reviewing one or two article in the GA nominations queue. The process is as you know intentionally straightforward, and involves checking an article against the GA criteria that you are familiar with. Guidance is provided on the GA pages. All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jakob Coles, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Malinaccier ( talk) 17:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Catlin Brook at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Andrew D. (
talk) 22:23, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Grassy Island Creek
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Grassy Island Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Stedil --
Stedil (
talk) 04:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aylesworth Creek
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Aylesworth Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Argento Surfer --
Argento Surfer (
talk) 19:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Grassy Island Creek
The article
Grassy Island Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Grassy Island Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Stedil --
Stedil (
talk) 20:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
On 21 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Coffee Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission biologists tried to visit Coffee Brook in 2001, but were unable to reach it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coffee Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Coffee Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 14:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aylesworth Creek
The article
Aylesworth Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Aylesworth Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Argento Surfer --
Argento Surfer (
talk) 03:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aylesworth Creek
The article
Aylesworth Creek you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Aylesworth Creek for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Argento Surfer --
Argento Surfer (
talk) 13:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
On 27 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Barnes Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Barnes Brook lacked any habitats for fish in 2001, but is now being considered for addition to the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission's list of wild trout streams? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barnes Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Barnes Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde ( talk) 12:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk) 07:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Surprise! Your initial review is complete. I have your nomination in a hold status so that you may amend your article. I am in WP on pretty much a daily basis, so when you have made your changes, ping me at my Talk page for a quick response. I applaud your diligence in compiling this article. Georgejdorner ( talk) 07:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Powderly Creek
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Powderly Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jo-Jo Eumerus --
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 20:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary)
The article
Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk) 18:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
On 30 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sciota Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sciota Brook is only 2 miles (3.2 km) long but flows through three counties in Pennsylvania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sciota Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Sciota Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Grassy Island Creek
The article
Grassy Island Creek you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Grassy Island Creek for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Stedil --
Stedil (
talk) 00:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary)
The article
Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary) you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk) 17:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rush Brook
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Rush Brook you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk) 17:41, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
Your first round of critiquing is complete as of the above, and needs your attention. If you are going to take action on the above nom, please do so and/or advise me of your intentions.
Thank you. Georgejdorner ( talk) 01:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rush Brook
The article
Rush Brook you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Rush Brook for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk) 05:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Powderly Creek
The article
Powderly Creek you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Powderly Creek for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jo-Jo Eumerus --
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 14:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
On 15 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Catlin Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the waterfalls on Catlin Brook are the "holy grail" of Pennsylvania waterfalls? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Catlin Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Catlin Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:03, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Jakob Coles! You created a thread called Archival by
User:Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Hello, Jakob Coles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello
Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.
We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.
Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.
The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.
Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:No Commons requested has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits 21:51, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
"1922–23 Al-Mokhtalat SC seasonn" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1922–23 Al-Mokhtalat SC seasonn. Since you had some involvement with the 1922–23 Al-Mokhtalat SC seasonn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC 678 16:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:IXS Enterprise.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Jakob, I can see that you care a lot about North Branch Buffalo Creek, Coal Run, and Panther Run.
Until recently, North Branch Buffalo Creek was poorly mapped on OpenStreetMap – and Panther Run and Coal Run were not mapped at all. I think it will please you to know that I took care of those deficiencies. GPS Pilot ( talk) 03:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For your work on Pennsylvania streams. GPS Pilot ( talk) 03:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
Hi Jakob Coles! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC) |
|
|
Welcome back! :) — Yash talk stalk 00:55, 12 March 2017 (UTC) |
On 15 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nancy Run, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nancy Run in Northampton County, Pennsylvania, is named after an old fortune teller? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nancy Run. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Nancy Run), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
| Newsletter Nr 3 for
WikiProject Genealogy (and
Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
Participation: This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Request: In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well as taking new, important steps towards a creation of a new project site, we need to make communication between the users easier and more effective. At Mail list on meta is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia email list. In order to request the creation of such a list, we need your voice and your vote. In order to create a new list, we need to put a request it in Phabricator, and add a link to reasoning/explanation of purpose, and link to community consensus. Therefore we need your vote for this now, so we can request the creation of the mail list. Read more about this email list at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project mail list where you can support the creation of the mail list with your vote, in case you haven't done so already. Future:
Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
Message added 22:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
New messages at the discussion. Sigh. North America 1000 22:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
| Newsletter Nr 4, 2017-03-24, for
WikiProject Genealogy (and
Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
Participation: This is the fourth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Mail list is created: The project email list is now created and ready to use! Please feel free to subscribe at https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-genealogy Future:
Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from
our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
Welcome back Jakob Coles. I noticed this new account while I was scrolling through GA nomination Talk:Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River). If you don't want the admin tools, maybe you should notify WP:BN. It's not like you're hiding; you have your own reasons for the new account name. But you really should formally get the old account taken care of. Wikipedia is treating it as an active account and I think there is the possibility of confusion later down the line. Anyway, good luck. — Maile ( talk) 00:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
- @ Maile66: Thanks for the welcome. Seeing as I don't have the password anymore, what do you recommend be done with the old account. (I may have mentioned, but I'm no longer particularly interested in adminship.) Jakob ( talk) 02:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- I think the recommended procedure is to post at WP:BN and let them deal with the de-admin under the old account names. One thing that comes to mind is some hacker getting the tools and committing hanky-panky under your old name. Best wishes for your path forward. May you have nothing but blue skies ahead. — Maile ( talk) 11:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
On 1 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Polk Valley Run, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Poke Valley Run was reputedly named for its shite pokes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Polk Valley Run. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Polk Valley Run), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 12:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Congrats on that, but what is " scrub meadow"? — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 19:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
On 6 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black River (Saucon Creek), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Black River is a "miserable ditch"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black River (Saucon Creek). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Black River (Saucon Creek)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter ( talk) 00:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Template:Did you know nominations/The Big Bend at the
Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in
step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{
db-g7}}, or ask a
DYK admin. Thank you.
DYKHousekeepingBot (
talk) 01:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
The Big Bend at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk) 22:30, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah ( talk) 21:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Kasson Brook, Jakob Coles!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for creating this. You've created 12 good articles, and once they're created, they go through review at New Page Patrol. Yours are too good to add to the large backlog there. Once you've created 25 articles, can you please go to WP:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled and ask for your articles to be autopatrolled? This will cut the backlog and mean your articles go straight onto Google instead of waiting up to 90 days.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 06:45, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jakob. I was following the recent thread at WP:BN with interest, and a thought struck me. As Jakec, did you ever use Special:EmailUser/Oversight to send an email to the oversight team ( User:Oversight)? (If you've ever requested oversight before, this is probably how you did it.) If so, we may be able to link your two accounts definitively if you still have access to the email address you used as Jakec. Mz7 ( talk) 05:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- @
Mz7: I have in fact emailed the oversight team a few times.
Jakob (
talk) 01:26, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- @
Jakob Coles: Go through your email's archive and see if you can find any responses from the oversight team. In the subject bar of the email there should be a 16-digit OTRS ticket number in brackets, e.g. [Ticket#1234567890123456]. Send an email with the same email address to the
functionaries mailing list (functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org) mentioning this ticket number and ask for a member of the oversight team to compare the email address listed in the OTRS ticket to the email you are currently using. If they match, they should be able to make an official statement over at
WP:BN verifying that your two accounts are linked. The reason this works is because when you used
Special:EmailUser/Oversight, the email was sent by the MediaWiki software under your Jakec Wikipedia account, not by your email client. As a result, the oversighters should be able to check the email headers and verify that the Jakec account used the same email address as you are now.
Mz7 (
talk) 06:24, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- @
Jakob Coles: Go through your email's archive and see if you can find any responses from the oversight team. In the subject bar of the email there should be a 16-digit OTRS ticket number in brackets, e.g. [Ticket#1234567890123456]. Send an email with the same email address to the
functionaries mailing list (functionaries-en
On 21 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Scouten Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that smut has been reported on Scouten Brook? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Scouten Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Scouten Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
IronGargoyle ( talk) 12:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 16:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
On 25 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Big Bend, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Big Bend, which would be the world's longest building if built, was designed to circumvent zoning regulations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Big Bend. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, The Big Bend), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 12:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
On 15 August 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Red Brook (Stony Brook), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a swamp in the watershed of Red Brook is home to part of the largest population of yellow-bellied flycatchers in Pennsylvania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Red Brook (Stony Brook). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Red Brook (Stony Brook)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 01:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River)
The article
Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
The Rambling Man --
The Rambling Man (
talk) 07:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
On 5 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Opossum Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that evidence of beavers was first detected on Opossum Brook in 1929 by a man on his way to Hell's Kitchen? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Opossum Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Opossum Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih Talk 00:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity (for User:Jakec)
Following a
community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to
provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the
Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the
re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at
WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. —
xaosflux
Talk 00:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Wow, it's been that long, huh? Time flies, I guess. I've had a lot of fun writing articles here, but I don't think I'll be editing much anymore—I have a lot less free time now than I did in high school, and have by and large moved on to other things. Thanks anyway, and good luck with the project!
Jakob (
talk) 01:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Best wishes, should you wish to resume mopping please log in as User:Jakec and drop a note at WP:BN, alternatively have your other account request that the access be moved to this one if you will be using it (also at WP:BN). This will be available for just under 2 years, after which time you would need to request community approval at WP:RFA. — xaosflux Talk 02:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River tributary)
The article
Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River tributary) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Meadow Brook (Lackawanna River tributary) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Example --
Example (
talk) 05:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Jakob Coles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing
Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
<span style="background:brown">'''[[User:Jakob Coles|<font color="white">Jakob</font>]] ([[User talk:Jakob Coles|<font color="white">talk</font>]])'''</span>: Jakob ( talk)
to
<span style="background:brown">'''[[User:Jakob Coles|<span style="color: white;">Jakob</span>]] ([[User talk:Jakob Coles|<span style="color: white;">talk</span>]])'''</span>: Jakob ( talk)
Respectfully, Anomalocaris ( talk) 20:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Most users are updating their signatures as requested. We hope you will also. — Anomalocaris ( talk) 06:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, as a fellow-user of the GA process, I would like to invite you to consider reviewing one or two article in the GA nominations queue. The process is as you know intentionally straightforward, and involves checking an article against the GA criteria that you are familiar with. Guidance is provided on the GA pages. All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jakob Coles, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Malinaccier ( talk) 17:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Catlin Brook at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Andrew D. (
talk) 22:23, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Grassy Island Creek
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Grassy Island Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Stedil --
Stedil (
talk) 04:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aylesworth Creek
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Aylesworth Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Argento Surfer --
Argento Surfer (
talk) 19:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Grassy Island Creek
The article
Grassy Island Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Grassy Island Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Stedil --
Stedil (
talk) 20:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
On 21 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Coffee Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission biologists tried to visit Coffee Brook in 2001, but were unable to reach it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coffee Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Coffee Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 14:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aylesworth Creek
The article
Aylesworth Creek you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Aylesworth Creek for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Argento Surfer --
Argento Surfer (
talk) 03:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aylesworth Creek
The article
Aylesworth Creek you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Aylesworth Creek for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Argento Surfer --
Argento Surfer (
talk) 13:41, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
On 27 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Barnes Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Barnes Brook lacked any habitats for fish in 2001, but is now being considered for addition to the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission's list of wild trout streams? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barnes Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Barnes Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde ( talk) 12:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk) 07:01, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Surprise! Your initial review is complete. I have your nomination in a hold status so that you may amend your article. I am in WP on pretty much a daily basis, so when you have made your changes, ping me at my Talk page for a quick response. I applaud your diligence in compiling this article. Georgejdorner ( talk) 07:49, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Powderly Creek
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Powderly Creek you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jo-Jo Eumerus --
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 20:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary)
The article
Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk) 18:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
On 30 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sciota Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sciota Brook is only 2 miles (3.2 km) long but flows through three counties in Pennsylvania? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sciota Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Sciota Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Grassy Island Creek
The article
Grassy Island Creek you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Grassy Island Creek for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Stedil --
Stedil (
talk) 00:41, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary)
The article
Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary) you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Wildcat Creek (Lackawanna River tributary) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk) 17:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rush Brook
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Rush Brook you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk) 17:41, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
Your first round of critiquing is complete as of the above, and needs your attention. If you are going to take action on the above nom, please do so and/or advise me of your intentions.
Thank you. Georgejdorner ( talk) 01:06, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rush Brook
The article
Rush Brook you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Rush Brook for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Georgejdorner --
Georgejdorner (
talk) 05:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Powderly Creek
The article
Powderly Creek you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Powderly Creek for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Jo-Jo Eumerus --
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk) 14:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
On 15 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Catlin Brook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the waterfalls on Catlin Brook are the "holy grail" of Pennsylvania waterfalls? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Catlin Brook. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Catlin Brook), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:03, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Jakob Coles! You created a thread called Archival by
User:Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by
Muninnbot, both
automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Hello, Jakob Coles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello
Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.
We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.
We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.
Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.
The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.
Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Template:No Commons requested has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits 21:51, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
"1922–23 Al-Mokhtalat SC seasonn" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1922–23 Al-Mokhtalat SC seasonn. Since you had some involvement with the 1922–23 Al-Mokhtalat SC seasonn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC 678 16:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:IXS Enterprise.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Jakob, I can see that you care a lot about North Branch Buffalo Creek, Coal Run, and Panther Run.
Until recently, North Branch Buffalo Creek was poorly mapped on OpenStreetMap – and Panther Run and Coal Run were not mapped at all. I think it will please you to know that I took care of those deficiencies. GPS Pilot ( talk) 03:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For your work on Pennsylvania streams. GPS Pilot ( talk) 03:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC) |