The result was delete. czar 08:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
A homoeopath and Hindi writer who translated books from Sanskrit. The article talks mostly about his personal life, and its single reference is a website that makes no mention of him. I've only been able to verify that he is a registered homoeopath (as of 2013) [1]. I don't see any trace of his literary activities. A search for Adya Prasad Chaturvedi returns no results on google news or google books. A normal google search returns five pages of results, which are either wikipedia mirrors or pages about other people with this name. No google results for what I presume is the Hindi spelling आद्य प्रसाद चतुर्वेदी: [2] [3] [4]. The article claims his penname is Jay Gurudev but I haven't searched for it as it's way too generic. Uanfala ( talk) 23:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lack of discussion renders consensus undeterminable. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 15:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Another long-standing music article with notability tags, this one since 2014. The band played Glastonbury, but many do (there's tons and tons of stages every year), and although they've released a number of albums and singles it's not clear how much coverage they received. They only released one album on Wall of Sound - a remixes release doesn't really count as a separate album - so they don't meet the two album criteria either. Happy to accept arguments as I'm listing based on the long-standing tags on the article. KaisaL ( talk) 14:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 08:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. Available sources are limited to press releases, business listings, and a couple of passing mentions of two employees in the Washington Post [10] [11]. - Mr X 16:03, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Try http://writersdiet.com/?page_id=4 czar 08:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, non-notable literary group. Self-promotional JMHamo ( talk) 17:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. On the strength of the arguments there is a narrow consensus to delete. If someone wants a copy mailing to them, let me know. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a musician, which makes no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and is very poorly sourced -- in fact, the article is copied and pasted directly from his own self-published website about himself. While the content there is CC-licensed, preventing this from being speediable as a WP:COPYVIO, the notability and the reliable sourcing needed to make him eligible to have it copied and pasted into Wikipedia has not been shown. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 20:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete - translating two of the refs from Swedish still revealed no evidence of n otability. The University of Gothenburg refs show that he exists and plays music, probably plays music well. But nothing that I can see conveys notability as required by Wikipedia. Velella Velella Talk 22:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Not Delete - Being a Swede and specially Gothenburg I know Pedro Miguell is a quite big name in Gothenburg Sweden since he won the contemporary music contest in Växjö in 2013 and become the year after principal conductor of Göteborg Moderna Orkester which is very uncommon to people with only 24 years old. I recommend the article being submitted to review, specially the references because mainly are found in local newspapers like GP. However I agree with BearCat and Richard3120 that it looks a bit promotional article by this company Nowartis. Mozigon ( talk) 00:45, 25 July 2016 (UTC)— Mozigon ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep - Pedro Miguell is a well known Portuguese young composers and conductors inside the classical music world. I was reading the article and it is very incompatible but he achieved notability during his bachelor's degree time. He won a competition with his first opera. Like mozigon, I would keep this article but submit it to deep revision. Sarahoboenix ( talk) 06:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)— Sarahoboenix ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Do not Delete - Pedro Miguell is a well known young composer in Portugal connected to multiple movements in Porto. (Proart ensemble, maus hábitos, fora de horas). Apart from that, he has published music works in Sweden. Notability was reached for sure on WP:NMUSIC topic 1). 2.) 9.) and 11.) Leichnester ( talk) 09:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)— Leichnester ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep for a limited time to revisionOkey I found this. He has an album in Itunes, so Swedish music charts? https://itunes.apple.com/en/album/timings-ep/id1138059271?app=music&ign-mpt=uo%3D4 WP:NMUSIC second topic is checked? I think we should keep this article for 60 days until it is well sourced and edited, otherwise delete it. Trumann12 ( talk) 22:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Non Notable Junior Level Civil Servant. Fails WP:BIO. Page is promotional and autobiographical with exaggerations. While we do have some biographies of very Civil Service officers, this isn't the case as she is junior level. Plus, the article appears to be heavily padded with things which happened to occur on her watch, rather than things for which he was directly responsible. Uncletomwood ( talk) 19:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 15:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable team. Although England Korfball list Bec as among their "Premier League", there is no indication that this is a notable league (in the same manner that the English Premier football league is notable). No significant, independent coverage can be found for this team. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 22:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Dear WikiDan61 - I am the current England captain for korfball and also the Chair of Bec Korfball Club so pretty well informed in this area. That being said, I am also a beginner when it comes to Wikipedia so do bear that in mind! I can confirm that the "Premier League" on the England Korfball site is the top level of competition for korfball in England (e.g. the equivalent of the English Premier League in football for our sport) so it is certainly notable.
In terms of independent coverage:
What else do I need to do to stop the page from being deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KorfBen ( talk • contribs) 12:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
@ WikiDan61: In the manner of many who use the phrase "with no intent to", you have managed to achieve exactly what you were supposedly trying not to. Comparing our sport to Tiddlywinks undermines the many people who commit their time to playing, coaching and organising the sport around the world. Unlike Tiddlywinks, Korfball is a sport, which is Olympic-recognised and has been in the World Games for decades. Although I see your point about the article being written by me, surely the fact that respected organisations such as the BBC and Sky Sports deem Korfball notable enough to feature should be enough for the inclusion of the top domestic teams on Wikipedia?
@ WikiDan61: Referring to Bec as a local team is incorrect. It is one of the largest and most successful korfball clubs in the UK. The Manchester United of korfball in the UK if you will. I do not understand why you are so keen to try and take down this page? As I think I have made clear, although it may not be notable for you, it is certainly notable for those who play our sport. What harm does it do by existing? As a side note, if you do insist on taking it down, I recommend you do the same for Trojans Korfball Club and Highbury Korfball Club.
The result was delete. sufficient consensus after relisting DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Promotion for not notable company. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Current article is a bombardment of press releases and listing. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lack of discussion renders consensus undeterminable. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 15:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
This toyline has nothing to establish notability independent of the main work. I am also nominating the following related toyline articles that also fail to establish notability:
The result was delete. czar 09:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Procedural nomination. Have declined a PROD for this article as there are some (minor) reliable sources - the discussion may benefit from the wider editor review of AfD. -- Euryalus ( talk) 07:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 00:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
(Since this is a 3rd nomination, what follows is a very long discussion of what went wrong in the last AfD)
In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motoroids (2nd nomination), one editor (@ Anupmehra:) argued that it should be kept based on WP:WEBCRIT #1, "the content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." While it is true that there the International Business Times routinely summarizes bits of automotive content from Motoroids, and HighBeam has similar hits for a mysterious magazine called Auto Business News (ABN), the content that is picked up by other publications is entirely trivial, or WP:ROUTINE.
The content is generated thus: Harley-Davidson India emails out a press release, crowing that they are going to open some new dealerships. Motoriods proceeds to write a blog post, Harley-Davidson opens two new dealerships in Surat and Bengaluru consisting mostly of direct quotes from Harley-Davidson's press release. The following day over at International Business Times, another blogger reads the Motoroids blog post about the H-D press release, and writes their own short summary, Harley-Davidson Opens New Dealerships in Bangalore, Surat, crediting Motoroids for the "scoop" and again heavily quoting the original press release. This cycle is repeated dozens of times, perhaps hundreds. Every time you read a "according to Motoroids this" or "Motoroids reported that", if you click the link, it consists of nothing but Motoroids blogging a quick gloss of a press release from a car or motorcycle company.
The previous AFD failed to note that WP:WEBCRIT does not count "trivial coverage, such as: a brief summary of the nature of the content" which is all that Motoroids gets, and even then, it's only for rehashing press releases.
The fact that Motoroids gets cited by others might be an argument to trust it as a WP:RS, but reliability is not equivalent to notability.
If we are to have an article about Motoroids, what should the article say? We have no sources that verify that it was formerly called Motoroids2, was founded in 2009, has an office in Mumbai, or has a team of 8 writers and 2 photographers. Nobody has published anything about Motoroids except an Alexa rank. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 04:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 15:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Only one notable production credit; likely fails WP:BAND. Very few sources found Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sufficient consensus despite relatively low participation DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Still nothing at all suggesting the needed independent notability as his listed works are not major or otherwise convincing and the majority only seems to be as a gun effects worker; my searches have found nothing better and the Japanese Wiki has nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Notability is not clear. Written like a resume Ibrahim Husain Meraj ( talk) 14:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lack of discussion renders consensus undeterminable. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 16:00, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
The article is apparently a television series. There are no news reports or reliable sources available to support GNG. Placing a request for discussion on whether this article should be deleted. Lourdes 18:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 09:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable company lacking significant coverage in reliable sources – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 17:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lack of discussion renders consensus undeterminable. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 16:00, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Only claim of notability is "too old from the time period of Mahabharat". No references to support the claim and this could not be verified from a credible source in Google search. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. After being relisted three times, consensus seems to be to keep, but due to the "weak"ness of the !votes, it's the result is leaning towards no consensus. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 07:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Completely unreferenced WP:BLP of a television writer, whose only stated claim of notability is writing a single episode of a television series. As always, screenwriters are not automatically eligible for articles just because they exist; reliable source coverage, supporting a claim of notability for more than just existing, must be present. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 04:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 09:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Frankly I classify this as A7 material and if it was removed, I would've PRODed....but chances are that would've been removed also; my own searches have simply found nothing at all and there's still nothing suggesting actual independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was closed as hoax. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 19:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Geographic feature that doesn't appear to meet WP:NGEO or WP:GNG, with most Google results referring to Mexico, not Spain. Cordless Larry ( talk) 18:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Insecticons. czar 09:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
This character doesn't establish notability. On its own, the "top 9 list" doesn't really help much. TTN ( talk) 12:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 09:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Completely non-notable software, a spammer's article J. M. ( talk) 22:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This is an informative description of a popular download manager, their are many others in wikipedia that follow the same format, they are active and have a large amount of edits - meaning they haven't slipped through the net so to speak, and have been deemed worthy. This is no exception. Article should remain. Michaelbarry147 ( talk) 22:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. ErikHaugen ( talk | contribs) 05:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Large computer science original research; POV fork of AVL tree article, basically retelling it in Java language. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Article deleted 21:58, 30 July 2016 by Jo-Jo Eumerus under G7. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 07:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
No evidence that the subject meets WP:ORGDEPTH notability. - Mr X 13:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft deletion as an uncontested PROD ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Struggling to find sources to back up the claims in this article. Assumed good faith a while ago on the "10 million downloads" claim but can't find any sources to prove this. — foxj 11:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG notability for lack of available sources. - Mr X 11:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Article in question was created by a blocked user in violation of their block, and has been deleted per G5. ( non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 15:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is almost entirely a copy paste of plot summaries, cast lists, and box office revenue from the other three articles ( Kyaa Kool Hai Hum, Kyaa Super Kool Hain Hum, and Kyaa Kool Hain Hum 3). There's no evidence that the series as an independent subject is notable. - Mr X 11:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear enough DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 07:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Was previously redirected to her single, but recreated by User:XXN with the comment "restored article. Notable person (via both MUSICBIO & GNC). You are free to start an AFD if you disagree". No independent, reliable sources or any assertion of notability in the article; the second sentence says that she is best known for My Love On You. Slashme ( talk) 17:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
2010 - 26. ANDA ADAM - LOVE ON YOU 85. SASHA LOPEZ FEAT. ANDA ADAM - MADAM 2012 - 75. KOUROSH TAZMINI FEAT. ANDA ADAM - CAN U FEEL LOVE 2013 - 46. ANDA ADAM - AMO 59. ANDA ADAM - DACA AR FI 2014 - 86. ANDA ADAM - DACA AR FI 2015 - 59. ANDA ADAM FEAT. C.R.B.L. - SERI DE MAI
http://mediaforest.ro/Charts/Chart2010.aspx
http://mediaforest.ro/Charts/Chart2012.aspx
http://mediaforest.ro/Charts/Chart2013.aspx
http://mediaforest.ro/Charts/Chart2014.aspx
http://mediaforest.ro/Charts/Chart2015.aspx
-- XXN, 19:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Blanked by article creator. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) GermanJoe ( talk) 20:49, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Likely non-notable actress. Current sources are mere listings or passing mentions for her roles (some of them not in reliable sources). Google search didn't show any in-depth coverage. The article also includes lots of irrelevant tangential details and non-neutral exaggerating descriptions. None of her activities (minor roles in telenovelas, some commercials and modeling, unspecified productions) clearly indicate notability. Topic doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Note: I have removed 2 unreliable sources (IMDB, a blacklisted forum) and cleaned up a bit before this nomination. GermanJoe ( talk) 08:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator - article has been blanked by author, see also help request at User talk:Le producteur for more info. I left some additional advice for a possible future draft, in case additional sources become available later. GermanJoe ( talk) 20:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources, sourcing is mostly by him, not about him. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
This article doesn't cite any reliable sources, and I can't find any. Graham 87 07:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm not seeing much for coverage. Was active in the 2000s. She has a starring role in 5 cm, I's, and Aika R-16/Zero, and possibly main in Haibane, but none of those are real standout roles in the anime industry. Only one anime convention appearance. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 06:38, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Paul Townsend (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) SST flyer 10:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
This DAB page isn't serving a purpose. I checked - there's only one Paul Townshend mentioned on all of Wikipedia and it's Pete's brother. The other entry is a guy with a similar name. This is a WP:TWODABS scenario if you count the second entry as legitimate (it probably isn't) and even then there's no ambiguity here. Nohomersryan ( talk) 04:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per SNOW. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 09:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
I don't know anything about firearms, but it's not clear that this rifle is notable in its own right. It it already mentioned several times in the AR-15 article. It does have a brief mention in the one referenced book, but besides that I can only find a few YouTube videos mentioning it and sales at some gun stores. Pianoman320 ( talk) 21:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Spam posted by the company Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCOMPANY. The only sources I can find on this company are business directories that simply show its existence. Even the external link provided to the company's website is broken. Drm310 ( talk) 01:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 08:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
A homoeopath and Hindi writer who translated books from Sanskrit. The article talks mostly about his personal life, and its single reference is a website that makes no mention of him. I've only been able to verify that he is a registered homoeopath (as of 2013) [1]. I don't see any trace of his literary activities. A search for Adya Prasad Chaturvedi returns no results on google news or google books. A normal google search returns five pages of results, which are either wikipedia mirrors or pages about other people with this name. No google results for what I presume is the Hindi spelling आद्य प्रसाद चतुर्वेदी: [2] [3] [4]. The article claims his penname is Jay Gurudev but I haven't searched for it as it's way too generic. Uanfala ( talk) 23:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lack of discussion renders consensus undeterminable. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 15:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Another long-standing music article with notability tags, this one since 2014. The band played Glastonbury, but many do (there's tons and tons of stages every year), and although they've released a number of albums and singles it's not clear how much coverage they received. They only released one album on Wall of Sound - a remixes release doesn't really count as a separate album - so they don't meet the two album criteria either. Happy to accept arguments as I'm listing based on the long-standing tags on the article. KaisaL ( talk) 14:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 08:47, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. Available sources are limited to press releases, business listings, and a couple of passing mentions of two employees in the Washington Post [10] [11]. - Mr X 16:03, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Try http://writersdiet.com/?page_id=4 czar 08:49, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, non-notable literary group. Self-promotional JMHamo ( talk) 17:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. On the strength of the arguments there is a narrow consensus to delete. If someone wants a copy mailing to them, let me know. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a musician, which makes no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and is very poorly sourced -- in fact, the article is copied and pasted directly from his own self-published website about himself. While the content there is CC-licensed, preventing this from being speediable as a WP:COPYVIO, the notability and the reliable sourcing needed to make him eligible to have it copied and pasted into Wikipedia has not been shown. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 20:57, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete - translating two of the refs from Swedish still revealed no evidence of n otability. The University of Gothenburg refs show that he exists and plays music, probably plays music well. But nothing that I can see conveys notability as required by Wikipedia. Velella Velella Talk 22:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Not Delete - Being a Swede and specially Gothenburg I know Pedro Miguell is a quite big name in Gothenburg Sweden since he won the contemporary music contest in Växjö in 2013 and become the year after principal conductor of Göteborg Moderna Orkester which is very uncommon to people with only 24 years old. I recommend the article being submitted to review, specially the references because mainly are found in local newspapers like GP. However I agree with BearCat and Richard3120 that it looks a bit promotional article by this company Nowartis. Mozigon ( talk) 00:45, 25 July 2016 (UTC)— Mozigon ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep - Pedro Miguell is a well known Portuguese young composers and conductors inside the classical music world. I was reading the article and it is very incompatible but he achieved notability during his bachelor's degree time. He won a competition with his first opera. Like mozigon, I would keep this article but submit it to deep revision. Sarahoboenix ( talk) 06:58, 25 July 2016 (UTC)— Sarahoboenix ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Do not Delete - Pedro Miguell is a well known young composer in Portugal connected to multiple movements in Porto. (Proart ensemble, maus hábitos, fora de horas). Apart from that, he has published music works in Sweden. Notability was reached for sure on WP:NMUSIC topic 1). 2.) 9.) and 11.) Leichnester ( talk) 09:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)— Leichnester ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep for a limited time to revisionOkey I found this. He has an album in Itunes, so Swedish music charts? https://itunes.apple.com/en/album/timings-ep/id1138059271?app=music&ign-mpt=uo%3D4 WP:NMUSIC second topic is checked? I think we should keep this article for 60 days until it is well sourced and edited, otherwise delete it. Trumann12 ( talk) 22:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Non Notable Junior Level Civil Servant. Fails WP:BIO. Page is promotional and autobiographical with exaggerations. While we do have some biographies of very Civil Service officers, this isn't the case as she is junior level. Plus, the article appears to be heavily padded with things which happened to occur on her watch, rather than things for which he was directly responsible. Uncletomwood ( talk) 19:43, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 15:57, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable team. Although England Korfball list Bec as among their "Premier League", there is no indication that this is a notable league (in the same manner that the English Premier football league is notable). No significant, independent coverage can be found for this team. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 22:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Dear WikiDan61 - I am the current England captain for korfball and also the Chair of Bec Korfball Club so pretty well informed in this area. That being said, I am also a beginner when it comes to Wikipedia so do bear that in mind! I can confirm that the "Premier League" on the England Korfball site is the top level of competition for korfball in England (e.g. the equivalent of the English Premier League in football for our sport) so it is certainly notable.
In terms of independent coverage:
What else do I need to do to stop the page from being deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KorfBen ( talk • contribs) 12:02, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
@ WikiDan61: In the manner of many who use the phrase "with no intent to", you have managed to achieve exactly what you were supposedly trying not to. Comparing our sport to Tiddlywinks undermines the many people who commit their time to playing, coaching and organising the sport around the world. Unlike Tiddlywinks, Korfball is a sport, which is Olympic-recognised and has been in the World Games for decades. Although I see your point about the article being written by me, surely the fact that respected organisations such as the BBC and Sky Sports deem Korfball notable enough to feature should be enough for the inclusion of the top domestic teams on Wikipedia?
@ WikiDan61: Referring to Bec as a local team is incorrect. It is one of the largest and most successful korfball clubs in the UK. The Manchester United of korfball in the UK if you will. I do not understand why you are so keen to try and take down this page? As I think I have made clear, although it may not be notable for you, it is certainly notable for those who play our sport. What harm does it do by existing? As a side note, if you do insist on taking it down, I recommend you do the same for Trojans Korfball Club and Highbury Korfball Club.
The result was delete. sufficient consensus after relisting DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Promotion for not notable company. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Current article is a bombardment of press releases and listing. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:34, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lack of discussion renders consensus undeterminable. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 15:58, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
This toyline has nothing to establish notability independent of the main work. I am also nominating the following related toyline articles that also fail to establish notability:
The result was delete. czar 09:01, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Procedural nomination. Have declined a PROD for this article as there are some (minor) reliable sources - the discussion may benefit from the wider editor review of AfD. -- Euryalus ( talk) 07:50, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 00:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
(Since this is a 3rd nomination, what follows is a very long discussion of what went wrong in the last AfD)
In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motoroids (2nd nomination), one editor (@ Anupmehra:) argued that it should be kept based on WP:WEBCRIT #1, "the content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." While it is true that there the International Business Times routinely summarizes bits of automotive content from Motoroids, and HighBeam has similar hits for a mysterious magazine called Auto Business News (ABN), the content that is picked up by other publications is entirely trivial, or WP:ROUTINE.
The content is generated thus: Harley-Davidson India emails out a press release, crowing that they are going to open some new dealerships. Motoriods proceeds to write a blog post, Harley-Davidson opens two new dealerships in Surat and Bengaluru consisting mostly of direct quotes from Harley-Davidson's press release. The following day over at International Business Times, another blogger reads the Motoroids blog post about the H-D press release, and writes their own short summary, Harley-Davidson Opens New Dealerships in Bangalore, Surat, crediting Motoroids for the "scoop" and again heavily quoting the original press release. This cycle is repeated dozens of times, perhaps hundreds. Every time you read a "according to Motoroids this" or "Motoroids reported that", if you click the link, it consists of nothing but Motoroids blogging a quick gloss of a press release from a car or motorcycle company.
The previous AFD failed to note that WP:WEBCRIT does not count "trivial coverage, such as: a brief summary of the nature of the content" which is all that Motoroids gets, and even then, it's only for rehashing press releases.
The fact that Motoroids gets cited by others might be an argument to trust it as a WP:RS, but reliability is not equivalent to notability.
If we are to have an article about Motoroids, what should the article say? We have no sources that verify that it was formerly called Motoroids2, was founded in 2009, has an office in Mumbai, or has a team of 8 writers and 2 photographers. Nobody has published anything about Motoroids except an Alexa rank. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 04:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 15:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Only one notable production credit; likely fails WP:BAND. Very few sources found Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sufficient consensus despite relatively low participation DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Still nothing at all suggesting the needed independent notability as his listed works are not major or otherwise convincing and the majority only seems to be as a gun effects worker; my searches have found nothing better and the Japanese Wiki has nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Notability is not clear. Written like a resume Ibrahim Husain Meraj ( talk) 14:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lack of discussion renders consensus undeterminable. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 16:00, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
The article is apparently a television series. There are no news reports or reliable sources available to support GNG. Placing a request for discussion on whether this article should be deleted. Lourdes 18:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 09:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable company lacking significant coverage in reliable sources – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 17:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Lack of discussion renders consensus undeterminable. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 16:00, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Only claim of notability is "too old from the time period of Mahabharat". No references to support the claim and this could not be verified from a credible source in Google search. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:59, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. After being relisted three times, consensus seems to be to keep, but due to the "weak"ness of the !votes, it's the result is leaning towards no consensus. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 07:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Completely unreferenced WP:BLP of a television writer, whose only stated claim of notability is writing a single episode of a television series. As always, screenwriters are not automatically eligible for articles just because they exist; reliable source coverage, supporting a claim of notability for more than just existing, must be present. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 04:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 09:13, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Frankly I classify this as A7 material and if it was removed, I would've PRODed....but chances are that would've been removed also; my own searches have simply found nothing at all and there's still nothing suggesting actual independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was closed as hoax. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 19:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Geographic feature that doesn't appear to meet WP:NGEO or WP:GNG, with most Google results referring to Mexico, not Spain. Cordless Larry ( talk) 18:08, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Insecticons. czar 09:14, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
This character doesn't establish notability. On its own, the "top 9 list" doesn't really help much. TTN ( talk) 12:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 09:15, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Completely non-notable software, a spammer's article J. M. ( talk) 22:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
This is an informative description of a popular download manager, their are many others in wikipedia that follow the same format, they are active and have a large amount of edits - meaning they haven't slipped through the net so to speak, and have been deemed worthy. This is no exception. Article should remain. Michaelbarry147 ( talk) 22:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. ErikHaugen ( talk | contribs) 05:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Large computer science original research; POV fork of AVL tree article, basically retelling it in Java language. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:11, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Article deleted 21:58, 30 July 2016 by Jo-Jo Eumerus under G7. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 07:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
No evidence that the subject meets WP:ORGDEPTH notability. - Mr X 13:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft deletion as an uncontested PROD ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Struggling to find sources to back up the claims in this article. Assumed good faith a while ago on the "10 million downloads" claim but can't find any sources to prove this. — foxj 11:50, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG notability for lack of available sources. - Mr X 11:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Article in question was created by a blocked user in violation of their block, and has been deleted per G5. ( non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 15:06, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
This article is almost entirely a copy paste of plot summaries, cast lists, and box office revenue from the other three articles ( Kyaa Kool Hai Hum, Kyaa Super Kool Hain Hum, and Kyaa Kool Hain Hum 3). There's no evidence that the series as an independent subject is notable. - Mr X 11:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is clear enough DGG ( talk ) 04:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 07:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Was previously redirected to her single, but recreated by User:XXN with the comment "restored article. Notable person (via both MUSICBIO & GNC). You are free to start an AFD if you disagree". No independent, reliable sources or any assertion of notability in the article; the second sentence says that she is best known for My Love On You. Slashme ( talk) 17:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
2010 - 26. ANDA ADAM - LOVE ON YOU 85. SASHA LOPEZ FEAT. ANDA ADAM - MADAM 2012 - 75. KOUROSH TAZMINI FEAT. ANDA ADAM - CAN U FEEL LOVE 2013 - 46. ANDA ADAM - AMO 59. ANDA ADAM - DACA AR FI 2014 - 86. ANDA ADAM - DACA AR FI 2015 - 59. ANDA ADAM FEAT. C.R.B.L. - SERI DE MAI
http://mediaforest.ro/Charts/Chart2010.aspx
http://mediaforest.ro/Charts/Chart2012.aspx
http://mediaforest.ro/Charts/Chart2013.aspx
http://mediaforest.ro/Charts/Chart2014.aspx
http://mediaforest.ro/Charts/Chart2015.aspx
-- XXN, 19:42, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Blanked by article creator. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) GermanJoe ( talk) 20:49, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Likely non-notable actress. Current sources are mere listings or passing mentions for her roles (some of them not in reliable sources). Google search didn't show any in-depth coverage. The article also includes lots of irrelevant tangential details and non-neutral exaggerating descriptions. None of her activities (minor roles in telenovelas, some commercials and modeling, unspecified productions) clearly indicate notability. Topic doesn't meet WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Note: I have removed 2 unreliable sources (IMDB, a blacklisted forum) and cleaned up a bit before this nomination. GermanJoe ( talk) 08:50, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator - article has been blanked by author, see also help request at User talk:Le producteur for more info. I left some additional advice for a possible future draft, in case additional sources become available later. GermanJoe ( talk) 20:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 16:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources, sourcing is mostly by him, not about him. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:56, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
This article doesn't cite any reliable sources, and I can't find any. Graham 87 07:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
I'm not seeing much for coverage. Was active in the 2000s. She has a starring role in 5 cm, I's, and Aika R-16/Zero, and possibly main in Haibane, but none of those are real standout roles in the anime industry. Only one anime convention appearance. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 06:38, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Paul Townsend (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) SST flyer 10:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
This DAB page isn't serving a purpose. I checked - there's only one Paul Townshend mentioned on all of Wikipedia and it's Pete's brother. The other entry is a guy with a similar name. This is a WP:TWODABS scenario if you count the second entry as legitimate (it probably isn't) and even then there's no ambiguity here. Nohomersryan ( talk) 04:45, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per SNOW. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 09:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
I don't know anything about firearms, but it's not clear that this rifle is notable in its own right. It it already mentioned several times in the AR-15 article. It does have a brief mention in the one referenced book, but besides that I can only find a few YouTube videos mentioning it and sales at some gun stores. Pianoman320 ( talk) 21:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Spam posted by the company Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:12, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCOMPANY. The only sources I can find on this company are business directories that simply show its existence. Even the external link provided to the company's website is broken. Drm310 ( talk) 01:20, 24 July 2016 (UTC)