![]() |
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Not a notable person. He won small amounts of money in minor poker tournaments a long time ago, and created a website. If we are to include every such person, there would be thousands of BLP's for poker players. DegenFarang ( talk) 01:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Israeli-occupied territories. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
POV fork of Israeli-occupied territories. What is the evidence that this is the term used to designate these territories in the discourse of international law? The generally accepted term is occupied territories. Dlv999 ( talk) 23:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable software by non-notable software company. Article contains peacock "first" claim but has no references to back this up. Bob Re-born ( talk) 23:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable software by non-notable software company. Article contains peacock "first" claim but has no references to back this up. Bob Re-born ( talk) 23:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:AIRCRASH. Shootdowns of aircraft during a conflict, accidental or not, aren't notable unless someone themselves notable is involved. Which clearly isn't the case here. ...William 22:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC0
The result was speedy delete. Blatant hoax. As an Alaskan this is perhaps more obvious to me, this is so full of errors and outright fabrications that there is no chance it is not just a ball of lies. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
This is a hoax. Unfortunately it has been here for over two years (congratulations to new user Praemonitus ( talk), who tagged it), so mirrors have spread it quite widely, but I can find no independent confirmation. The name is not in Geonames, nor is it in the Times Comprehensive Atlas of the World. I have not found any record of the "East Alaska Oil Co." If their operations at Cayperl were "incredibly successful" and controversial, exciting "strong interest and campaigning", there would surely be some record on-line. The article author has only four other edits, none of them constructive. JohnCD ( talk) 20:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete per Criterion for speedy deletion G12. I just searched for the use of the word 'said' in the prose of the article, which is often the give away that material has been lifted from a news story (eg, when it appears in a format such as "an IDF spokesperson said..." or similar), and followed the links to the first ten or so news stories and several others selected at random where the links are still live. In the great majority of cases the material in the article had been lifted word for word from the news story. Google searching for other uses of 'said' selected at random from entries without a specific reference revealed similar problems. This was a simple test, and I imagine that checking each of the entries against the reference (including those which don't include the giveaway word 'said') would have revealed wider problems given that most of the entries were written in the style of news stories. As there is no good version to revert to in an article such as this, it's clearly a candidate for speedy deletion. If editors in good standing would like to work on this offline and provide me (or any other admin) with a commitment that they won't republish it until the copyvios are addressed I'd be happy to email them a copy - though this should still be available from Wikipedia mirrors for at least the next few weeks. Nick-D ( talk) 09:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The actual history of this article is a bit muddled, but its apparent creator has called it "all propaganda" and "not worth wasting time." See discussion at Talk:Israel–Gaza conflict timeline 2006–2008#Requested move. This may fail WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. It's a somewhat arbitrary timeline in an ongoing conflict. Is every death in this conflict notable? Its purpose is unclear. BDD ( talk) 20:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. considering the sock puppetry, SALT for now Secret account 02:19, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:N, no independent reliable sources. Article appears to be have been created and maintained by poll's creator Esprqii ( talk) 19:56, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
No references, may fail the general guidelines for notability. I did find this link that shows his filmography. Tarheel95 ( Sprechen) 19:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to U-KISS. ( non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Ril ey 00:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Not notable outside of his band. All information in the article is available in the U-KISS article or can be included there. 小龙 (Timish) # xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng 23:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this landscape architect under WP:GNG. Caveat: If there are non-English sources, it is very likely I would have missed them. j⚛e decker talk 17:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep and move. Non-admin closure. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
This article does not cite any sources or references. Rahul Jain ( talk) 16:29, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Secret account 02:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:CRYSTAL. No independent sources seem to confirm its existence. It seems to be a proposed project of the National Library of Australia, but does not yet appear to actually exist. Yunshui 雲 水 13:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The museum is a major digitization initiative of Australian museums and a registered charity in Australia. The existence of the museum can be verified at www.asic.gov.au, www.ato.gov.au and numerous other Australian government sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.94.236 ( talk) 14:02, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WP:SNOWBALL, Delete, restore redirect. and protect. j⚛e decker talk 07:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Massively POV. Rife with
soapboxing phrases like simply refer to marriage as between 1 man and 1 woman
, linked to the degradation of religious liberty
, and imperialist agenda
. Is there any conceivable good article that could be made out of this? It's within the realm of possibility. Is there anything salvageable in the page history? No. I'm half-inclined to
G11 this as completely promotional of an anti-gay point of view. (Or would that be heterophobic of me?
) Seeing as the far more objective
Homophobia#"Heterophobia" already exists, I propose we revert to Sandstein's redirect to that section, and fully protect the page until and unless someone can propose an objective version that passes
WP:42 (since really, the way I see it, the section in the
Homophobia article does the job well enough). —
PinkAmpers
&
(Je vous invite à me parler)
13:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy keep, no valid deletion rationale given, and what the.....? - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Reason Men2002 ( talk) 12:36, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Notre Dame Fighting Irish football. J04n( talk page) 10:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Future football schedules. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of sports trivia. The logic of WP:FUTURE applies as well. GrapedApe ( talk) 12:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
-- Raddok ( talk) 4:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Colorado Buffaloes football. Although there is only one !vote to merge there are three other very similar AfDs where consensus is to merge. Either way consensus at this discussion is not to keep, so merging some of the material is a viable option.. J04n( talk page) 11:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Future football schedules. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of sports trivia. The logic of WP:FUTURE applies as well. Also, material is not being kept up, since the "future season" of 2012 has already occurred. GrapedApe ( talk) 12:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to BYU Cougars football. J04n( talk page) 11:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Future football schedules. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of sports trivia. The logic of WP:FUTURE applies as well. GrapedApe ( talk) 12:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:11, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Nonnotable software Staszek Lem ( talk) 20:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Nonnotable piece of software Staszek Lem ( talk) 20:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to BoA. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
So what? I hesitated to speedy this but saying it is the first "solo" concert could conceivably be a claim to significance, well delete because: trivial, unencyclopaedic, non-notable. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Secret account 02:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
PROD contested by article creator. This article is wholly unreferenced and there is no evidence of notability. Having a music video on YouTube does not confer notability. Fails WP:BAND. Giant Snowman 12:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Secret account 02:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
press-release-driven article, lack of notability. UseTheCommandLine ( talk) 13:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:11, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable college consortium: does not appear to have achieved anything, no real indication of lasting importance and influence. GrapedApe ( talk) 04:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
I've tried searching his name in various iterations, and can't find RS coverage to support a claim to notability. Tagged for notability for close to five years. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche ( talk) 04:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Although numericaly the opinions to keep exceeded to delete AfD is not a vote. The delete opinions were more policy based. As suggested by AdventurousSquirrel, I would be happy to userfy the article to anyone who wants to work on it without the spectre of AfD hanging over their head. What this means is that the page would be moved into your user-space where it can be edited freely. J04n( talk page) 11:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Fails WP:ORG, relies heavily on self-published sources, search didn't provide significant, reliable, independent coverage. AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 08:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Moroever, related to magazins; I have a question to more advanced wikipedia users; there is a Hungarian magazin, that is called LIFE magazin. This magazin was reporting about the existence of the Sant Bani Ashram in its issue July 2012; and published some interviews with Master Sirio. But it is not available as a free of charge digital media. Anyhow; once they even put the photo of Master Sirio on the cover of the magazin. But how could I mark it as independent reference; what is the correct way of it? Could you give me advice? Thanks a lot. This is the link for the covers of the magazin, where it is visible, Master Sirio was on the cover recently, (also talking about the ashram in interview): http://pozitivemberek.hu/kategoriak/49 . D0rk4.r0l4nd ( talk) 23:06, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Sant Bani Ashram (Ribolla) is the biggest Surat Shabd Yoga meditation centre; or with other name, Sant Mat ashram in Europe. This place is operating in a fully nonprofit way; making it possible to so many people every year to practice Surat Shabd Yoga there with one of the living great Yoga Masters, Master Sirio. Even about these programs held there, one could find so many documentary photos, proving the real existence of the place, and that a number of people go there to visit it and attend programs from all over the world. Also, there are a number of other (non English language) independent (third party) websites referring to this place; reporting about programs held there, articles written by attendants of the programs etc. I do not fully understand the base of the proposal; and also that upon one proposal the page could be removed. I find this policy very strange and fully agree with Santmatradhasoami, in hoping that this page can remain on the wikipedia, after so many years, giving relevant information to all those about this place who was looking for it. D0rk4.r0l4nd ( talk) 15:38, 4 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Moreover we find similar examples in all fields of life in Wiki: The White House and pages for its presidents, The Vatikan and pages for the present pope, the Kaaba and a page for Mohammed, and last but not least Graceland and its inhabitant Elivs Presley ! So dear Squirrel, page patroller and member of the welcome comittee, please reconsider your task and be fair... Dr.med.Klüber ( talk) 17:02, 4 February 2013 (UTC) reply
here you can see an article about the Sant Bani Ashram (Ribolla) on the CESNUR website... Cesnur it's the center of studies on new religions, an independent, famous, authoritative source... it's in italian so I was not sure to link to the english page about the ashram, but it is linked in the italian one... GurDass ( talk) 22:15, 4 February 2013 (UTC) reply
So, personally I consider it a verily unfair and biased idea to delete a page like this, and, therefore, very strongly recommend that the page be kept. - Pravesh K. Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Praveshksingh ( talk • contribs) 05:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
In my opinion the information that is on the page is trustworthy, hopefully detailed and informative enough for everybody who would like to know about this place. I really disagree with merging as well, since the place in a way is independent from Master Sirio Carrapa, SSYoga master, as the public place, Sant Bani Ashram - as written above - is the property of the Sant Bani Association, so I do not see the point in merging the two pages. One is representing a public person; and the other is representing a public place, that has its own history. I myself am the vice-president of the SBA Association, knowing the ashram and its history very well. So, I cannot accept the deleting of the page upon the given reasons, but of course I am ready to edit the content and reference list upon good and useful advices from expert wiki users. My activity is fully nonprofit in it, such as that of anybody for the ashram and the all operation and running of the place. So, please respect the noble purpose behind the case, and instead of propsing for deletion, help to improve the page to those people who were creating it and who may be less knowledgeable in wiki terms then other expert ones. Thanks a lot. D0rk4.r0l4nd ( talk) 19:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Another example of the normality or precedent of an entry for a spiritual teacher AND another page about the ashram associated with the same path or philosophy: Jai Gurudev: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jai_gurudev Naam yog Sadhna Mandir ('mandir' is another term for ashram): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naam_yog_Sadhna_Mandir No, deletion is not always the answer. In this case it seems unreasonable to assume no improvements can be forthcoming. The default position should always be to seek to improve articles. Santmatradhasoami ( talk) 13:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC) reply
I ask for a final decision on this deletion. I really think there is no element to delete this page. It is well sourced with links taken from newspapers, indepentent sant mat websites and the Center for Studies on New Religions also talks about this place. That is a not-common place, free and non-profit. A week is passed and nobody except for the user that originally asked for deletion agreed with him... --
GurDass (
talk)
18:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
reply
http://www.cesnur.org/religioni_italia/r/radhasoami_02.htm http://aranyhegy.com/sirio-mester#ashram http://www.abc-of-meditation.com/view-refer.asp?id=12839&ReturnPage=%2Ftps%2Fpresentation-preview-short-retreatcenter.asp%3FTP_ID%3D12839 -- GurDass ( talk) 05:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was SPEEDY DELETE G11. Alexf (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Completely unessesary list. I would speedy it but I'm not sure under what rational. Cabe 6403 ( Talk• Sign) 11:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Gangnam Style#Other parodies and covers. ( non-admin closure) TBrandley ( what's up) 02:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT plus a smattering of anything else you can think of Petebutt ( talk) 10:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NACTOR. Hasn't played a significant role nor does he have a large fan base. Hard to find reliable sources - the Radio Times ref merely confirms he played in an episode of Father Ted Gbawden ( talk) 09:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Johnny Rocco. Even though I opined below, I choose to be a bit bold and am closing this discussion about the "duplicate" Johnny Rocco (1958 movie) as sensible per the observations below. No merge is necessary as the (formerly identical) target now has more content and context than it did when this discussion began. Per consensus and common sense, I am closing this discussion as moot, and am redirecting both the one brought to AFD and Johnny Rocco (1958 film) to Johnny Rocco. If anyone wishes to nominate the target article, we can have a new discussion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Same content of Johnny Rocco (1958 film). Duplicate page. atnair ( talk) 03:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable company, not the subject of multiple third party press mentions. The company bought Mark Zuckerburgs' first website. Relentlessly promotional with numerous non-notable awards listed. CitizenNeutral ( talk) 02:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable company, subject of one passing press mention. Company was created 4 months ago. Maybe it'll be notable one day, but it's clearly too soon. CitizenNeutral ( talk) 02:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
There is already an article with title [Noise] which covers signal processing noise. atnair ( talk) 02:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Ril ey 00:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
I believe this article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and should be merged with Savoy Hotel or deleted. There are some passing mentions of this company in reliable sources, but the article is promotional in nature. CitizenNeutral ( talk) 02:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to East Carolina Pirates football. J04n( talk page) 11:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Future football schedules. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of sports trivia. Material is not being kept up, since the "future season" of 2012 has already occurred. The logic of WP:FUTURE applies as well. GrapedApe ( talk)
The result was speedy keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Organization doesn't seem close to being at all notable and all sources are primary sources.
GladiusHellfire (
talk)
00:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Ril ey 23:59, 18 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Player has never played in professional football The Banner talk 00:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Player has never played in professional football. The Banner talk 00:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by User:Rannpháirtí anaithnid under criterion G3. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 01:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Hoax, copy of André Villas-Boas with some of the information changed. Other pages created by User:Jacob cannon are also hoaxes and need deleting. Peter James ( talk) 00:04, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was move to Battle of Chaliyam and redirect to Vettathunad. The Bushranger One ping only 08:51, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Cut down article originally wholly copied from Vettathunad and attempt to raise an obscure, non-notable skirmish at a fort to a battle standing. There was no "Battle of Chalium". GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC) GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC) reply
![]() |
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Not a notable person. He won small amounts of money in minor poker tournaments a long time ago, and created a website. If we are to include every such person, there would be thousands of BLP's for poker players. DegenFarang ( talk) 01:03, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Israeli-occupied territories. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
POV fork of Israeli-occupied territories. What is the evidence that this is the term used to designate these territories in the discourse of international law? The generally accepted term is occupied territories. Dlv999 ( talk) 23:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:06, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable software by non-notable software company. Article contains peacock "first" claim but has no references to back this up. Bob Re-born ( talk) 23:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable software by non-notable software company. Article contains peacock "first" claim but has no references to back this up. Bob Re-born ( talk) 23:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:AIRCRASH. Shootdowns of aircraft during a conflict, accidental or not, aren't notable unless someone themselves notable is involved. Which clearly isn't the case here. ...William 22:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC0
The result was speedy delete. Blatant hoax. As an Alaskan this is perhaps more obvious to me, this is so full of errors and outright fabrications that there is no chance it is not just a ball of lies. Beeblebrox ( talk) 20:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
This is a hoax. Unfortunately it has been here for over two years (congratulations to new user Praemonitus ( talk), who tagged it), so mirrors have spread it quite widely, but I can find no independent confirmation. The name is not in Geonames, nor is it in the Times Comprehensive Atlas of the World. I have not found any record of the "East Alaska Oil Co." If their operations at Cayperl were "incredibly successful" and controversial, exciting "strong interest and campaigning", there would surely be some record on-line. The article author has only four other edits, none of them constructive. JohnCD ( talk) 20:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete per Criterion for speedy deletion G12. I just searched for the use of the word 'said' in the prose of the article, which is often the give away that material has been lifted from a news story (eg, when it appears in a format such as "an IDF spokesperson said..." or similar), and followed the links to the first ten or so news stories and several others selected at random where the links are still live. In the great majority of cases the material in the article had been lifted word for word from the news story. Google searching for other uses of 'said' selected at random from entries without a specific reference revealed similar problems. This was a simple test, and I imagine that checking each of the entries against the reference (including those which don't include the giveaway word 'said') would have revealed wider problems given that most of the entries were written in the style of news stories. As there is no good version to revert to in an article such as this, it's clearly a candidate for speedy deletion. If editors in good standing would like to work on this offline and provide me (or any other admin) with a commitment that they won't republish it until the copyvios are addressed I'd be happy to email them a copy - though this should still be available from Wikipedia mirrors for at least the next few weeks. Nick-D ( talk) 09:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The actual history of this article is a bit muddled, but its apparent creator has called it "all propaganda" and "not worth wasting time." See discussion at Talk:Israel–Gaza conflict timeline 2006–2008#Requested move. This may fail WP:NOTNEWSPAPER and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. It's a somewhat arbitrary timeline in an ongoing conflict. Is every death in this conflict notable? Its purpose is unclear. BDD ( talk) 20:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. considering the sock puppetry, SALT for now Secret account 02:19, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:N, no independent reliable sources. Article appears to be have been created and maintained by poll's creator Esprqii ( talk) 19:56, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
No references, may fail the general guidelines for notability. I did find this link that shows his filmography. Tarheel95 ( Sprechen) 19:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to U-KISS. ( non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Ril ey 00:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Not notable outside of his band. All information in the article is available in the U-KISS article or can be included there. 小龙 (Timish) # xiǎolóng de xìnxiāng 23:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this landscape architect under WP:GNG. Caveat: If there are non-English sources, it is very likely I would have missed them. j⚛e decker talk 17:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep and move. Non-admin closure. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
This article does not cite any sources or references. Rahul Jain ( talk) 16:29, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Secret account 02:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:CRYSTAL. No independent sources seem to confirm its existence. It seems to be a proposed project of the National Library of Australia, but does not yet appear to actually exist. Yunshui 雲 水 13:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The museum is a major digitization initiative of Australian museums and a registered charity in Australia. The existence of the museum can be verified at www.asic.gov.au, www.ato.gov.au and numerous other Australian government sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.94.236 ( talk) 14:02, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WP:SNOWBALL, Delete, restore redirect. and protect. j⚛e decker talk 07:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Massively POV. Rife with
soapboxing phrases like simply refer to marriage as between 1 man and 1 woman
, linked to the degradation of religious liberty
, and imperialist agenda
. Is there any conceivable good article that could be made out of this? It's within the realm of possibility. Is there anything salvageable in the page history? No. I'm half-inclined to
G11 this as completely promotional of an anti-gay point of view. (Or would that be heterophobic of me?
) Seeing as the far more objective
Homophobia#"Heterophobia" already exists, I propose we revert to Sandstein's redirect to that section, and fully protect the page until and unless someone can propose an objective version that passes
WP:42 (since really, the way I see it, the section in the
Homophobia article does the job well enough). —
PinkAmpers
&
(Je vous invite à me parler)
13:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy keep, no valid deletion rationale given, and what the.....? - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Reason Men2002 ( talk) 12:36, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Notre Dame Fighting Irish football. J04n( talk page) 10:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Future football schedules. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of sports trivia. The logic of WP:FUTURE applies as well. GrapedApe ( talk) 12:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
-- Raddok ( talk) 4:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Colorado Buffaloes football. Although there is only one !vote to merge there are three other very similar AfDs where consensus is to merge. Either way consensus at this discussion is not to keep, so merging some of the material is a viable option.. J04n( talk page) 11:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Future football schedules. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of sports trivia. The logic of WP:FUTURE applies as well. Also, material is not being kept up, since the "future season" of 2012 has already occurred. GrapedApe ( talk) 12:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to BYU Cougars football. J04n( talk page) 11:05, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Future football schedules. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of sports trivia. The logic of WP:FUTURE applies as well. GrapedApe ( talk) 12:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:11, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Nonnotable software Staszek Lem ( talk) 20:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Nonnotable piece of software Staszek Lem ( talk) 20:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to BoA. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
So what? I hesitated to speedy this but saying it is the first "solo" concert could conceivably be a claim to significance, well delete because: trivial, unencyclopaedic, non-notable. CaptainScreebo Parley! 19:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Secret account 02:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
PROD contested by article creator. This article is wholly unreferenced and there is no evidence of notability. Having a music video on YouTube does not confer notability. Fails WP:BAND. Giant Snowman 12:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Secret account 02:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
press-release-driven article, lack of notability. UseTheCommandLine ( talk) 13:08, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:11, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable college consortium: does not appear to have achieved anything, no real indication of lasting importance and influence. GrapedApe ( talk) 04:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
I've tried searching his name in various iterations, and can't find RS coverage to support a claim to notability. Tagged for notability for close to five years. Created by an SPA. Epeefleche ( talk) 04:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Although numericaly the opinions to keep exceeded to delete AfD is not a vote. The delete opinions were more policy based. As suggested by AdventurousSquirrel, I would be happy to userfy the article to anyone who wants to work on it without the spectre of AfD hanging over their head. What this means is that the page would be moved into your user-space where it can be edited freely. J04n( talk page) 11:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Fails WP:ORG, relies heavily on self-published sources, search didn't provide significant, reliable, independent coverage. AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 08:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Moroever, related to magazins; I have a question to more advanced wikipedia users; there is a Hungarian magazin, that is called LIFE magazin. This magazin was reporting about the existence of the Sant Bani Ashram in its issue July 2012; and published some interviews with Master Sirio. But it is not available as a free of charge digital media. Anyhow; once they even put the photo of Master Sirio on the cover of the magazin. But how could I mark it as independent reference; what is the correct way of it? Could you give me advice? Thanks a lot. This is the link for the covers of the magazin, where it is visible, Master Sirio was on the cover recently, (also talking about the ashram in interview): http://pozitivemberek.hu/kategoriak/49 . D0rk4.r0l4nd ( talk) 23:06, 10 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Sant Bani Ashram (Ribolla) is the biggest Surat Shabd Yoga meditation centre; or with other name, Sant Mat ashram in Europe. This place is operating in a fully nonprofit way; making it possible to so many people every year to practice Surat Shabd Yoga there with one of the living great Yoga Masters, Master Sirio. Even about these programs held there, one could find so many documentary photos, proving the real existence of the place, and that a number of people go there to visit it and attend programs from all over the world. Also, there are a number of other (non English language) independent (third party) websites referring to this place; reporting about programs held there, articles written by attendants of the programs etc. I do not fully understand the base of the proposal; and also that upon one proposal the page could be removed. I find this policy very strange and fully agree with Santmatradhasoami, in hoping that this page can remain on the wikipedia, after so many years, giving relevant information to all those about this place who was looking for it. D0rk4.r0l4nd ( talk) 15:38, 4 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Moreover we find similar examples in all fields of life in Wiki: The White House and pages for its presidents, The Vatikan and pages for the present pope, the Kaaba and a page for Mohammed, and last but not least Graceland and its inhabitant Elivs Presley ! So dear Squirrel, page patroller and member of the welcome comittee, please reconsider your task and be fair... Dr.med.Klüber ( talk) 17:02, 4 February 2013 (UTC) reply
here you can see an article about the Sant Bani Ashram (Ribolla) on the CESNUR website... Cesnur it's the center of studies on new religions, an independent, famous, authoritative source... it's in italian so I was not sure to link to the english page about the ashram, but it is linked in the italian one... GurDass ( talk) 22:15, 4 February 2013 (UTC) reply
So, personally I consider it a verily unfair and biased idea to delete a page like this, and, therefore, very strongly recommend that the page be kept. - Pravesh K. Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Praveshksingh ( talk • contribs) 05:05, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
In my opinion the information that is on the page is trustworthy, hopefully detailed and informative enough for everybody who would like to know about this place. I really disagree with merging as well, since the place in a way is independent from Master Sirio Carrapa, SSYoga master, as the public place, Sant Bani Ashram - as written above - is the property of the Sant Bani Association, so I do not see the point in merging the two pages. One is representing a public person; and the other is representing a public place, that has its own history. I myself am the vice-president of the SBA Association, knowing the ashram and its history very well. So, I cannot accept the deleting of the page upon the given reasons, but of course I am ready to edit the content and reference list upon good and useful advices from expert wiki users. My activity is fully nonprofit in it, such as that of anybody for the ashram and the all operation and running of the place. So, please respect the noble purpose behind the case, and instead of propsing for deletion, help to improve the page to those people who were creating it and who may be less knowledgeable in wiki terms then other expert ones. Thanks a lot. D0rk4.r0l4nd ( talk) 19:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Another example of the normality or precedent of an entry for a spiritual teacher AND another page about the ashram associated with the same path or philosophy: Jai Gurudev: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jai_gurudev Naam yog Sadhna Mandir ('mandir' is another term for ashram): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naam_yog_Sadhna_Mandir No, deletion is not always the answer. In this case it seems unreasonable to assume no improvements can be forthcoming. The default position should always be to seek to improve articles. Santmatradhasoami ( talk) 13:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC) reply
I ask for a final decision on this deletion. I really think there is no element to delete this page. It is well sourced with links taken from newspapers, indepentent sant mat websites and the Center for Studies on New Religions also talks about this place. That is a not-common place, free and non-profit. A week is passed and nobody except for the user that originally asked for deletion agreed with him... --
GurDass (
talk)
18:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
reply
http://www.cesnur.org/religioni_italia/r/radhasoami_02.htm http://aranyhegy.com/sirio-mester#ashram http://www.abc-of-meditation.com/view-refer.asp?id=12839&ReturnPage=%2Ftps%2Fpresentation-preview-short-retreatcenter.asp%3FTP_ID%3D12839 -- GurDass ( talk) 05:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was SPEEDY DELETE G11. Alexf (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Completely unessesary list. I would speedy it but I'm not sure under what rational. Cabe 6403 ( Talk• Sign) 11:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Gangnam Style#Other parodies and covers. ( non-admin closure) TBrandley ( what's up) 02:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT plus a smattering of anything else you can think of Petebutt ( talk) 10:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NACTOR. Hasn't played a significant role nor does he have a large fan base. Hard to find reliable sources - the Radio Times ref merely confirms he played in an episode of Father Ted Gbawden ( talk) 09:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Johnny Rocco. Even though I opined below, I choose to be a bit bold and am closing this discussion about the "duplicate" Johnny Rocco (1958 movie) as sensible per the observations below. No merge is necessary as the (formerly identical) target now has more content and context than it did when this discussion began. Per consensus and common sense, I am closing this discussion as moot, and am redirecting both the one brought to AFD and Johnny Rocco (1958 film) to Johnny Rocco. If anyone wishes to nominate the target article, we can have a new discussion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Same content of Johnny Rocco (1958 film). Duplicate page. atnair ( talk) 03:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable company, not the subject of multiple third party press mentions. The company bought Mark Zuckerburgs' first website. Relentlessly promotional with numerous non-notable awards listed. CitizenNeutral ( talk) 02:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:58, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable company, subject of one passing press mention. Company was created 4 months ago. Maybe it'll be notable one day, but it's clearly too soon. CitizenNeutral ( talk) 02:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:08, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
There is already an article with title [Noise] which covers signal processing noise. atnair ( talk) 02:16, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Ril ey 00:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
I believe this article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and should be merged with Savoy Hotel or deleted. There are some passing mentions of this company in reliable sources, but the article is promotional in nature. CitizenNeutral ( talk) 02:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to East Carolina Pirates football. J04n( talk page) 11:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Future football schedules. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of sports trivia. Material is not being kept up, since the "future season" of 2012 has already occurred. The logic of WP:FUTURE applies as well. GrapedApe ( talk)
The result was speedy keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:07, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Organization doesn't seem close to being at all notable and all sources are primary sources.
GladiusHellfire (
talk)
00:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Ril ey 23:59, 18 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Player has never played in professional football The Banner talk 00:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) LlamaAl ( talk) 00:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Player has never played in professional football. The Banner talk 00:33, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by User:Rannpháirtí anaithnid under criterion G3. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 01:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Hoax, copy of André Villas-Boas with some of the information changed. Other pages created by User:Jacob cannon are also hoaxes and need deleting. Peter James ( talk) 00:04, 12 February 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was move to Battle of Chaliyam and redirect to Vettathunad. The Bushranger One ping only 08:51, 19 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Cut down article originally wholly copied from Vettathunad and attempt to raise an obscure, non-notable skirmish at a fort to a battle standing. There was no "Battle of Chalium". GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC) GenQuest "Talk to Me" 05:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC) reply