Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
European club rugby, by
Pretty Green (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
European club rugby fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
European club rugby, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --
Android Mouse Bot 2 11:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, welcome to Transnistria, the greatest sockpuppetry playground in the whole of Wikipedia! Sorry, but can I ask whose sockpuppet you would be...? ;-)
Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmmm, well,.... sorry for "biting the newcomers"; if you're in fact a genuine newcomer then I hope you'll accept my apologies. But still, I can't help feeling that you are not quite as new to this game as you want to make it appear. We're all a bit paranoid about sockpuppets over at that article, of course. We've just been seeing too many of them, you know. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's cycling-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Cycling? It's a group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all cycling-related articles.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page. -- Severo T C 19:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
|
On 5 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gough Map, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
-- Daniel Case ( talk) 17:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Statistical survey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Waggers ( talk) 11:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
hey there thanx for the welcome, i am new to editing wikipedia, I have used wikipedia for all other since a very long time. Funnily enough, right from the word go I have been under some scrutiny with some srticle that i updated recently getting reverted. Well just wanted to say hello and thanks, dunno whether it was a bot or a real person that welcomed me, anyways..thanx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Syedshoaib ( talk • contribs) 17:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Fail, me, never. What with the bribes and BJs, I've got this baby sewn up already -- Cooper-42 ( talk) 16:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
|
|
On 15 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Twenty20 Champions League, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
-- Daniel Case ( talk) 00:28, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
There is already a page for Jonathan Bellis so I have added the information in yours and created a redirect. Racklever ( talk) 18:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Appreciate the work you've done on the Stanford Super Series articles. As an american, it's hard to keep up on these things, (even if I am a bit of a cricket fan :D). SirFozzie ( talk) 23:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand why you had to make those edits to that article. Couldn't you have done those in your sandbox? – Pee Jay 12:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- No worries, mate. I understand where you're coming from. I hope you don't mind but I've been through the article and given it a proper shakedown in terms of spelling, links, etc. Should be almost worthy of B-Class now. – Pee Jay 13:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Just a quick note - since File:Hand of God goal.jpg is a non-free image (especially since it's a wire service image, so it's a commercial product in and of itself), and should not be used in the infobox, or anywhere other than the discussion of the photograph ( WP:NFCC#8 and all that). Otherwise, thanks for your work on the England v Argentina article. Cheers. -- Mosmof ( talk) 14:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Is it all covered in the match article? This seems to have more information. Enigma msg 06:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Euro 2016 bids.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 15:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I have blocked this account following a bout of vandalism from an account that previously made thousands of constructive edits. If I am mistaken in this assumption, please explain why this happened. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, those edits were drunk messing around at home but in bad taste; I apologise. -- Pretty Green ( talk) 09:03, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
I have unblocked you per this AN discussion, but I hope that you have learned your lesson from all of this. Please don't vandalize Wikipedia again, on either your account or your IP. Thanks, NW ( Talk) 15:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
As you have previously participated in discussions to move "Next United Kingdom general election" to "United Kingdom general election, 2009", I am writing to inform you that the discussion is once again taking place at Talk:Next United Kingdom general election#Page move, revisited. - Rrius ( talk) 23:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Inclusion of venues of training facilities seems to be placing an Anglocentric emphasis that is not found in the summary of the other bids: the cited article from the BBC makes no mention of Gateshead. Other bids have regional implications: the region, or made-up-compound-brand-name, is not the proposed venue. I would ask you to reconsider. Kevin McE ( talk) 10:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Pretty Green! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add
reliable,
secondary
sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current
941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Przemysław Niemiec - Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 20:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for sorting that out - its precedence had baffled me for ages. Motmit ( talk) 18:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
GA reassessment of United Kingdom national football team
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:United Kingdom national football team/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 15:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
I have been looking everywhere in wiki on how to do that...any ideaS? Jamen Somasu ( talk) 14:34, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I quoted something you had previously written in a new section of the same page called Talk:English people#Entropy 2. I would appreciate it if you would have a look confirm to the audience of the quote that I got it right. -- PBS ( talk) 01:06, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
You may be interested in commenting here. Regards, --RA ( talk) 08:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Your edit here introduced inaccuracies. I take it you thought this was the 2010-2011 version. Christopher Connor ( talk) 05:03, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Left some feedback for you. Great article! :) Pianotech ( talk) 15:24, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi there GREEN, VASCO here,
Thanks very much for your input here ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#POV_or_not_POV), sincerely. My writing style is indeed close to journalese, but not in a POVish way i hope, i am only trying to help. I know this is an encyclopedia, but i thought a little of "free writing" would be encouraged. I'm not a big fan of the "machine-like" writing i often found in articles stating: "In 2006, he signed with x team, scoring y goals. In 2007, he signed for z team, scoring k goals...so on, so on".
With the utmost respect for your work, i do have to say i don't understand why all the "citation needed" bits in the Alan Osório da Costa Silva article, when the POV is all but gone (saying he was a "key element" in V.Guimarães, when he played in 29 out of 30 games and the team finished third out of the second division requires citation? Clicking in both links show he shared team with R.Quaresma, an established Portuguese international - i removed CN tag in that one only - hope it's OK - after rephrasing it duly. Also, the games where he scored this or that goal in this or that game all appear in LINK#1 (zerozerofootball.com), i just don't see the point of "doubling" same source as link and ref). I am really at a loss, honestly. Attentively, have a great weekend, from Portugal - -- Vasco Amaral ( talk) 13:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- NEWSFLASH! Added two more refs (Portuguese site, but in English, good good goodie!), cheers - -- Vasco Amaral ( talk) 13:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for that tip on "doubling" REFS mate, already knew it though. Keep it up - -- Vasco Amaral ( talk) 14:34, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
i appreciated your commentary on ethnicity
it was needed 68.111.15.164 ( talk) 16:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to bother here, but as you are a contributor to certain discussions at the List of sovereign states I would like to show you the recently compiled list of all proposals for sorting criteria so that you can express your opinion here. Thanks! Alinor ( talk) 13:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
|
| On 2 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fred Else, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Shubinator ( talk) 02:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
A proposal to change the layout and sorting criteria of the article List of sovereign states has been finalised and submitted for consensus.
As you were previously involved in the discussion for this change, I thought I would inform you of the final proposal. Please provide comments here. Nightw 13:22, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Of course, there's no reason why this couldn't be applied for years since the drop-worst rule appeared and not previously. There is reason. If we add it in, then sooner or later someone will apply it to other years affected by dropped scores. Then we have an extended edit war. -- Falcadore ( talk) 14:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your article on short tennis. I made a comment about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis#Short tennis, and I thought you may well want add your contribution to this clarification. Coyets ( talk) 12:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for notifying me of your concern. I'll get working on a combined North/South section for now and re-split the info after the league meeting on 10 May.
I like what you did with the achievements, its cool. Barrovian ( talk) 16:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Yes, it is a pet peeve of mine. The does ( talk) 09:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
I have re-blocked User:Barrovian for two months after I found this account, with which he used to evade his previous block. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:43, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Pretty Green ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
- 129.234.252.67 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Roetard". The reason given for Roetard's block is: "Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information)".
Accept reason: All sorted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Judy Murray, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jamie Baker and Administrator ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited William Bayne Fisher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German invasion of France ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent edit to the article. While you may think it was innocuous and you were being WP:BOLD, there's a lengthy discussion about it on the article's talk page. You may have just started another edit war. Would you be so kind as entering the discussion on the article's talk page. And don't contact me about it, I have grown tired of the discussion and simply watch the article to revert vandalism now. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oi! And Real Madrid C.F.. You don't step into things half way do you. There's a similar conversation on their talk page. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi. When you recently edited Great Britain Olympic football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International football ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Darlington 1883, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Administration ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited England B national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graham Taylor ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Rakha Mines, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Eeekster (
talk) 21:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
European club rugby, by
Pretty Green (
talk ·
contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
European club rugby fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
European club rugby, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --
Android Mouse Bot 2 11:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, welcome to Transnistria, the greatest sockpuppetry playground in the whole of Wikipedia! Sorry, but can I ask whose sockpuppet you would be...? ;-)
Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmmm, well,.... sorry for "biting the newcomers"; if you're in fact a genuine newcomer then I hope you'll accept my apologies. But still, I can't help feeling that you are not quite as new to this game as you want to make it appear. We're all a bit paranoid about sockpuppets over at that article, of course. We've just been seeing too many of them, you know. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's cycling-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Cycling? It's a group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all cycling-related articles.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page. -- Severo T C 19:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
|
|
On 5 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gough Map, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
-- Daniel Case ( talk) 17:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Statistical survey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Waggers ( talk) 11:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
hey there thanx for the welcome, i am new to editing wikipedia, I have used wikipedia for all other since a very long time. Funnily enough, right from the word go I have been under some scrutiny with some srticle that i updated recently getting reverted. Well just wanted to say hello and thanks, dunno whether it was a bot or a real person that welcomed me, anyways..thanx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Syedshoaib ( talk • contribs) 17:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Fail, me, never. What with the bribes and BJs, I've got this baby sewn up already -- Cooper-42 ( talk) 16:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
|
|
On 15 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Twenty20 Champions League, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
-- Daniel Case ( talk) 00:28, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
There is already a page for Jonathan Bellis so I have added the information in yours and created a redirect. Racklever ( talk) 18:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Appreciate the work you've done on the Stanford Super Series articles. As an american, it's hard to keep up on these things, (even if I am a bit of a cricket fan :D). SirFozzie ( talk) 23:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand why you had to make those edits to that article. Couldn't you have done those in your sandbox? – Pee Jay 12:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- No worries, mate. I understand where you're coming from. I hope you don't mind but I've been through the article and given it a proper shakedown in terms of spelling, links, etc. Should be almost worthy of B-Class now. – Pee Jay 13:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Just a quick note - since File:Hand of God goal.jpg is a non-free image (especially since it's a wire service image, so it's a commercial product in and of itself), and should not be used in the infobox, or anywhere other than the discussion of the photograph ( WP:NFCC#8 and all that). Otherwise, thanks for your work on the England v Argentina article. Cheers. -- Mosmof ( talk) 14:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Is it all covered in the match article? This seems to have more information. Enigma msg 06:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Euro 2016 bids.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 15:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I have blocked this account following a bout of vandalism from an account that previously made thousands of constructive edits. If I am mistaken in this assumption, please explain why this happened. – Juliancolton | Talk 22:22, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, those edits were drunk messing around at home but in bad taste; I apologise. -- Pretty Green ( talk) 09:03, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
I have unblocked you per this AN discussion, but I hope that you have learned your lesson from all of this. Please don't vandalize Wikipedia again, on either your account or your IP. Thanks, NW ( Talk) 15:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
As you have previously participated in discussions to move "Next United Kingdom general election" to "United Kingdom general election, 2009", I am writing to inform you that the discussion is once again taking place at Talk:Next United Kingdom general election#Page move, revisited. - Rrius ( talk) 23:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Inclusion of venues of training facilities seems to be placing an Anglocentric emphasis that is not found in the summary of the other bids: the cited article from the BBC makes no mention of Gateshead. Other bids have regional implications: the region, or made-up-compound-brand-name, is not the proposed venue. I would ask you to reconsider. Kevin McE ( talk) 10:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Pretty Green! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add
reliable,
secondary
sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current
941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Przemysław Niemiec - Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 20:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for sorting that out - its precedence had baffled me for ages. Motmit ( talk) 18:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
GA reassessment of United Kingdom national football team
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:United Kingdom national football team/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 15:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
I have been looking everywhere in wiki on how to do that...any ideaS? Jamen Somasu ( talk) 14:34, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I quoted something you had previously written in a new section of the same page called Talk:English people#Entropy 2. I would appreciate it if you would have a look confirm to the audience of the quote that I got it right. -- PBS ( talk) 01:06, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
You may be interested in commenting here. Regards, --RA ( talk) 08:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Your edit here introduced inaccuracies. I take it you thought this was the 2010-2011 version. Christopher Connor ( talk) 05:03, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Left some feedback for you. Great article! :) Pianotech ( talk) 15:24, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi there GREEN, VASCO here,
Thanks very much for your input here ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#POV_or_not_POV), sincerely. My writing style is indeed close to journalese, but not in a POVish way i hope, i am only trying to help. I know this is an encyclopedia, but i thought a little of "free writing" would be encouraged. I'm not a big fan of the "machine-like" writing i often found in articles stating: "In 2006, he signed with x team, scoring y goals. In 2007, he signed for z team, scoring k goals...so on, so on".
With the utmost respect for your work, i do have to say i don't understand why all the "citation needed" bits in the Alan Osório da Costa Silva article, when the POV is all but gone (saying he was a "key element" in V.Guimarães, when he played in 29 out of 30 games and the team finished third out of the second division requires citation? Clicking in both links show he shared team with R.Quaresma, an established Portuguese international - i removed CN tag in that one only - hope it's OK - after rephrasing it duly. Also, the games where he scored this or that goal in this or that game all appear in LINK#1 (zerozerofootball.com), i just don't see the point of "doubling" same source as link and ref). I am really at a loss, honestly. Attentively, have a great weekend, from Portugal - -- Vasco Amaral ( talk) 13:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- NEWSFLASH! Added two more refs (Portuguese site, but in English, good good goodie!), cheers - -- Vasco Amaral ( talk) 13:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for that tip on "doubling" REFS mate, already knew it though. Keep it up - -- Vasco Amaral ( talk) 14:34, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
i appreciated your commentary on ethnicity
it was needed 68.111.15.164 ( talk) 16:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to bother here, but as you are a contributor to certain discussions at the List of sovereign states I would like to show you the recently compiled list of all proposals for sorting criteria so that you can express your opinion here. Thanks! Alinor ( talk) 13:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
|
| On 2 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fred Else, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Shubinator ( talk) 02:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
A proposal to change the layout and sorting criteria of the article List of sovereign states has been finalised and submitted for consensus.
As you were previously involved in the discussion for this change, I thought I would inform you of the final proposal. Please provide comments here. Nightw 13:22, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Of course, there's no reason why this couldn't be applied for years since the drop-worst rule appeared and not previously. There is reason. If we add it in, then sooner or later someone will apply it to other years affected by dropped scores. Then we have an extended edit war. -- Falcadore ( talk) 14:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your article on short tennis. I made a comment about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis#Short tennis, and I thought you may well want add your contribution to this clarification. Coyets ( talk) 12:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for notifying me of your concern. I'll get working on a combined North/South section for now and re-split the info after the league meeting on 10 May.
I like what you did with the achievements, its cool. Barrovian ( talk) 16:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Yes, it is a pet peeve of mine. The does ( talk) 09:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
I have re-blocked User:Barrovian for two months after I found this account, with which he used to evade his previous block. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:43, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Pretty Green ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
- 129.234.252.67 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Roetard". The reason given for Roetard's block is: "Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information)".
Accept reason: All sorted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Judy Murray, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jamie Baker and Administrator ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited William Bayne Fisher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German invasion of France ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your recent edit to the article. While you may think it was innocuous and you were being WP:BOLD, there's a lengthy discussion about it on the article's talk page. You may have just started another edit war. Would you be so kind as entering the discussion on the article's talk page. And don't contact me about it, I have grown tired of the discussion and simply watch the article to revert vandalism now. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Oi! And Real Madrid C.F.. You don't step into things half way do you. There's a similar conversation on their talk page. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi. When you recently edited Great Britain Olympic football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International football ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Darlington 1883, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Administration ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited England B national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graham Taylor ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Rakha Mines, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Eeekster (
talk) 21:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)