This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I do partially apologise for over-reacting, here and in my edit summary. TONY (talk) 07:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

That image should do fine, it captivates the environment quite well. I can't find the image I was after anyway, and its a lot of effort to install a five-disc game just to get one screenshot from the beginning of it. On the subject of images, can I ask your opinion of Vortigaunt? Do you think I should downsize the infobox image a bit, to make it shorter and not so space consuming? I'm also wondering whether its worth including an in-game shot. -- Sabre ( talk) 18:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I made the image myself—the joys of a model viewer—so I can provide you with any angle you want. I'm going to experiment with some other angles, but once I've found one I'm happy with, I'd love for you to add some "crispness" to the edges, I had to soften the edges in Paint Shop Pro to get rid of a lack of anti-aliasing in the model viewer. -- Sabre ( talk) 18:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Try this for size. Same animation, from the other side, with the camera angle a little lower to remove the foot extending half-way down the screen. As you can see, without softened, anti-aliased or otherwise untreated edges, its edges look awful. Damn shame that anti-aliasing isn't enabled in the model viewer. -- Sabre ( talk) 19:00, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid not. That's as big as I can get it in the model viewer. -- Sabre ( talk) 21:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

That picture's not too great because its an older version of the model, the one originally included with HL2. The current image is of a model introduced in Ep2, and is far superior in detail and lighting effects. I really want to use the Ep2 model, as it is the latest incarnation of the character. See what you get from from the one I gave you anyway, if nothing else works I can always use my run-the-soften-brush-around-the-edges technique on the raw image, it still shows the character in a decent manner. -- Sabre ( talk) 21:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Could you explain this deletion, seeings you failed to do so in the deletion summary? _Talk Islander 19:30, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, well in the future d'you reckon you could use the deletion summary? Helps avoid these things... Whilst I'm at it, perhaps I'm being thick (a distinct possibility), but I can't find any concencus / suggestion to merge the article... _Talk Islander 20:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I'll be sure to stop by the FAC soon. · AndonicO ^Engage. 16:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm still jealous at your FA count, and look, here I am helping you bump it up. ;) · AndonicO ^Engage. 16:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Pfft, you need to take third grade math. :P I'll try to have Riven done by tomorrow morning (twice over, because one copyedit is as worthless as an ant's behind). And a beer with a frosty beverage would be fine with me. :) · AndonicO ^Engage. 19:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I removed the articles you removed from the "Myst franchise" Category as most of them had to do with video game studios or creators and not games. I also prodded one of them, which leaves Pyst and Mysteria Film Group, and both of them are pretty weak. I suggest scrapping them, merging anything of value to the Myst series article and redirecting there. That way, all loose ends will be taken care of. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 18:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps put Pyst under popular culture references in the series article as it is still pretty small, and I think it may not be a game in the full sense, so it wont have as much development or reception to justify its own article. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 18:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm the one who created the Mysteria Film Group page, and am actively contributing to it as more details about the group are revealed. I object to the wholesale 'scrapping' of the topic and have restored it. If you have any doubts about the validity of the project, I suggest you read/listen to the various interviews of Rand Miller about the project; below is a link to an excellent article about this:

http://www.spokesmanreview.com/blogs/txt/archive/?postID=5293

Please give this topic time to mature. Robert The Rebuilder ( talk) 11:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi David. I would like to split the UNSC section into two other sections; one mentioning the government, and another one mentioning the military branches. Seeing as how you are mostly in charge of the article, I though I should have your permission. So, can I start working on it? I promise I'll make it good. Please. :) -- UNSC Trooper ( talk) 16:50, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that could work. I'll see what best fits it. Thanks a lot. -- UNSC Trooper ( talk) 19:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

If you're going to use another image for the UNSC section, I'd suggesting using this one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Halo3ODST.jpg It's more, representative. Oh, and I'm going to start working on splitting the article tomorrow. -- UNSC Trooper ( talk) 22:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 07:24, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I've wanted that barnstar since I helped make it a barnstar. Thank you very much. :) Oh, and I'll try to go to DC sometime, just for that frosty beverage. :P · AndonicO ^Engage. 16:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Just giving you your reminder about the newsletter updates the day before its distribution date, June 4th. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter#3rd edition for the necessary steps to update or just ask me. You may want to drop xenocidic a note after it's ready so he can deliver it.

PS- I know you have a couple FAC going on right now, so if you aren't available this time let me know and I'll update it. ( Guyinblack25 ^talk 17:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC))

No worries man, real life comes first. I'll take care of it, maybe next time. ( Guyinblack25 ^talk 15:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC))

Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight ( talk) 17:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello once again. I didn't realize you had left a message regarding the Fight the Panda Syndicate Wiki. Yes, I have just created a user account. I'd love to improve the content for the page.

User talk:67.81.235.168 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia • Learn more about using Wikipedia for research • Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Re: Fight the Panda Syndicate

Frankly, even if people have worked on it, doesn't make it notable for inclusion. However, if it gets deleted, I suggest that you create a user account, and I will post the old version in your userspace if you want so you can work on improving the article. David Fuchs (talk) 11:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

		The Special Barnstar
		For your efforts in improving the articles on both Myst and Riven, getting them to featured status so quickly, you deserve this. I wish I had your ability to improve articles like that. -- Sabre ( talk) 09:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games Newsletter

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter Volume I, No. 3 - June 4, 2008 Archive before | Archive After To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list. Project at a Glance As of 2008-06-04, the project has: 89 Featured articles 13 Featured Lists 9 Featured Topics 2 articles in Featured Article Review 208 Good Articles 0 articles in Good Article Review 10 articles for Peer review Changes to Featured and Good articles, lists, and topics Promoted FA/FL: The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, List of acquisitions by Electronic Arts, List of Harvest Moon titles, Riven, Myst, Topic: Characters of Halo, The Orange Box Demoted FA/FL: Devil May Cry series (FT) Promoted GA: Air (visual novel), Crash Boom Bang!, Driving Emotion Type-S, Einhänder, Half-Life 2: Episode Two, Metal Gear Solid, Off-Road Velociraptor Safari, Team Fortress 2, Grand Theft Auto (series), Kratos (God of War), History of video game consoles (seventh generation) Demoted GA: Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, Sonic the Hedgehog (character), Cloud Strife, Super Smash Bros. News There were 203 new articles in May 2008 Current proposals and discussions Well, gee, thanks 1up! 1UP.com has recently changed their rating scale. A list of affected articles can be found here. See discussion for details. About 28% of the articles on the list have been checked and updated. Inactive project cleanup Proposal to consolidate inactive projects and taskforces. Project page can be found here. WikiProject Dragon Quest has been redirected to WP:VG. WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games Guild Wars task force has been deleted. Interested in a specific video game series or company? Check out some of our task forces to help improve the related articles. Atari Command & Conquer Devil May Cry New! Gears of War Grand Theft Auto Silent Hill Suikoden New! StarCraft New! Valve Visual novels New! Warcraft Feature Writing about Development Development content is very important to include in an encyclopedic video game article. It provides a history of how the game came to be and provides real world information needed for an article to claim comprehensiveness. However, writing this section can be difficult because the amount and type of information available will vary for each game. One of the best sources for such information is a developer interview. These can provide insight into the thought process of the designers and give examples of influences and obstacles encountered. Previews can also be helpful by giving a snap shot of the game before it was released and may mention development issues that were still being addressed. When writing about development, common sense should be used to organize content to maintain a sense of flow for the reader. Most times, it is best to give the information in a somewhat chronological order—though information can also be grouped by topics like audio, promotion, graphics, etc. If one such topic gets large enough, it can be split off into its own subsection or regular section. For example, Kingdom Hearts#Audio is a separate section from the rest of the development information because it focuses on the game's musical score and voice acting. Portal (video game)#Soundtrack, however, does not have as much content and is a subsection of the main development section. What to include about development Who are the developers? Which company or studio developed the game, and are there any prominent designers involved? When did development begin? When and where was the game first announced? (e.g. Tokyo Game Show, E3 Media and Business Summit, etc.) What influenced the game's story, characters, music, and/or gameplay ? (e.g. past games, movies, books, etc.) Were there any delays? Was anything excluded because of time or technological constraints? (e.g. extra levels, game modes, characters, story arcs, etc.) Things to remember Avoid proseline. Though maintaining a sense to chronology is important, this section should not read like an ordered list of events. Images in this section should be relevant to the information given and should add on to it. Source everything to avoid information being tagged as original research. Things you can help with: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs Rick Jay Glen ( 1 participant) Unreleased third Minecraft album ( 2 participants) Kelly Metzger ( 4 participants) Do You Like Horny Bunnies? ( 9 participants; relisted) Atlus USA ( 5 participants; relisted) Danny Mastrogiorgio ( 2 participants; relisted) Police Trainer ( 3 participants; relisted) Sephiroth ( 20 participants; relisted) The Boss (Metal Gear) ( 6 participants; relisted) Balloon Brothers ( 4 participants; relisted) Enigma Engine ( 4 participants; relisted) ClanLib ( 8 participants; relisted) Merge discussions Forge (level editor) ( discussion) Greninja ( discussion) Nostalrius ( discussion) Opera House (Final Fantasy VI) ( discussion) Jane's US Navy Fighters 97 ( discussion) Transformers Decepticons ( discussion) Transformers Autobots ( discussion) Home video game console generations ( discussion) Bethesda Game Studios Austin ( discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Trauma Center Etika ( nom) Hotline Miami 2: Wrong Number ( nom) Good article nominations ZX Spectrum ( nom) The Sims Online ( start) Unicorn Overlord ( nom) Streets of Rage Remake ( start) Jynx ( start) Bulbasaur ( nom) Psyduck ( start) Shulk ( nom) Slowpoke (Pokémon) ( start) Gau (Final Fantasy) ( nom) Lock's Quest ( nom) Strago Magus ( start) Squirtle ( start) The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening DX ( start) Rayman (video game) ( nom) Setzer Gabbiani ( start) DYK nominations No did you know nominations Reviews and reassessments The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask ( nom) Hogwarts Legacy ( rev) Pokémon Channel ( nom) Discord ( rev) Rayman M ( rev) Rain World ( rev) Fallout: New Vegas ( nom) Articles that need... assessment ( 1) ( 2) reassessment (0) cleanup (12) infoboxes (8) cover art (220) screenshots (8,766) photos (62) translation from japan (126) creation merging Project Navigation VG Project Main pages Main project – talk Project category – talk Portal – talk VG Project Departments Assessment – talk Cleanup – talk Peer review – talk   Magazines – talk Newsletter – talk Video Game Images – talk

Please see Wikipedia:AC/C#Helping_out, specifically item 4. Only arbs, clerks and clerk helpers should be removing items from RFAR. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Sources look fine. I even fixed a typo for you. Ealdgyth - Talk 00:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Judging by the deletion of the page and the fact she wasn't merged into Characters of Myst, it seems that you're not including Ti'ana in the articles. Ti'ana may not appear in the games, but she is a highly important character in the backstory and two of the novels. She should be covered to some extent in a section in Characters of Myst. -- Sabre ( talk) 11:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

The statement about ignoring all rules wasn't directed towards your attitude towards the rules. I believe that you make good faith attempts to interpret and understand rules. My advice to you was that it's impossible to have a discussion with someone who takes "if a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it" as meaning that we can completely ignore a guideline in all cases, and create a new guideline that contradicts it. There's no value. Take your time to distance yourself from these kinds of nonproductive discussions. Randomran ( talk) 18:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I think the guideline should compromise with some of the people who are opposing the guideline on a genuinely different interpretation of the general notability requirement, or about concerns about organization or clarity. But you're right that the consensus has to ignore people who do not respect the consensus formed on other guidelines, thus leading us to create guidelines that contradict each other: (e.g.: saying that articles on fiction don't need reliable independent sources, and can be based entirely on self-published sources or the actual subject itself). Don't worry too much about the fringes who ignore some guidelines all the time. Usually other editors ignore them. If it becomes disruptive, there's mediation, arbitration, and requests for comment. Disputes might be resolved peacefully due to a good faith but mistaken belief on their part. Let's develop a consensus that's compatible with current guidelines, and resolve disputes with the fringes on a case by case basis. Randomran ( talk) 18:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

That's a good attitude. Try not to let yourself be frustrated by people who use IAR to ignore a guideline outright. I have faith in the consensus-building and dispute-resolution processes in wikipedia that either editors will adapt, or the guidelines will. This notability issue might go all the way up to Jimbo. So be it. But developing a specific notability guideline based on the general notability guideline is the next logical step. And there may be more steps after this. The end game is one of two things: this begins the unravelling of the general notability guideline, or (more likely, IMO) it reinforces it and clarifies it. Randomran ( talk) 18:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the final part of this edit, well, oddly enough, apparently someone ended up seeing fit to actually do so (don't worry, I am absolutely not saying you had anything whatsoever to do with that and not even that the now blocked editor in question was inspired by your comment as it appears to be retaliation for Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Strange page moves). Best, -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles ^Tally-ho! 20:57, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. In this edit you removed the plot heading, and I was just curious why. Was the content more appropriate in the gameplay section, or was it just a mistake? The Prince ( talk) 16:24, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok, didn't know that. The Prince ( talk) 19:00, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 07:45, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I will re-read the page tonight and see if I can list out some examples. If I can't, well then I don't have an actionable oppose, do I? -- Laser brain (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I am trying to consolidate a topic I started a while ago, which is the Lone Wolf (gamebooks) series. The main article of the list of books, of which there are 29, is List of Lone Wolf media, and I would like to merge the 28 book articles into this list. The thing is, I don't want you to do all the merging obviously, but you are really good at creating the format and syntax used, and I am clueless. I want it to look like the Halo media list; if you could help me create a draft of it, that would be awesome. :) Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 23:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Could you make it so that the sections on Flight from the Dark is Name, Release Date, and Media? If you do that for me, I can probably do the rest myself. :) You R THE BEST :D Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 02:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I'll say hi again as I get closer to Featured List status, which would be a first for me. :) Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 16:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

By the way, this offer, can extend to you as well. (I will be offline shortly, however, to watch the new episode of Law & Order: Criminal Intent. Best, -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles ^Tally-ho! 00:14, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter

The WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter Volume I, No. 8 - June 2008 May issue | July issue Project News There are currently 4,266 Good Articles listed at WP:GA. The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 157 unreviewed articles. Out of 215 total nominations, 44 are on hold, 13 are under review, and one is seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance! The oldest unreviewed articles are: Choctaw, One Night Stand (2007), Justin Tuck, Tristan Tzara, The Stake Out (Seinfeld episode), Impalement arts, Backlash (2007), Adelaide Rams, and Sam Cowan. The categories with the largest backlogs are: Theatre, film and drama (31), Sports and recreation (31), Transport (24), Music (13), and Art and architecture (11) The backlog at Good Article Reassessment currently stands at 4 articles up for re-review. GA Sweeps Update The GA Sweeps process is progressing nicely! During the month of May, a total of 82 articles were reviewed. Of that total, 71 were found to continue to meet the GA criteria, and 11 were delisted. There are currently 15 articles that are still on hold in this process, awaiting revisions. We are once again recruiting new sweeps participants. Candidates should be very strong and comfortable in reviewing GA and familiar with the GA processes and criteria. If you are interested, please contact OhanaUnited for details. GAN Reviewer of the Month Giggy ( talk · contribs) (a.k.a. Dihydrogen Monoxide ( talk · contribs)) is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for May, based on the assessments made by Dr. Cash on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. Giggy had a whopping 45 reviews during the month of May! Congratulations to Giggy ( talk · contribs) on being May's GAN Reviewer of the Month! Other outstanding reviewers during the month of May include: Ealdgyth ( talk · contribs) Eustress ( talk · contribs) GaryColemanFan ( talk · contribs) Ice Cold Beer ( talk · contribs) Juliancolton ( talk · contribs) Nikki311 ( talk · contribs) ThinkBlue ( talk · contribs) Yllosubmarine ( talk · contribs) Also, with 19 nominations, Mitchazenia ( talk · contribs) is the nominator of the month, followed by TonyTheTiger ( talk · contribs) with 8 nominations submitted. Member News There are now 216 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 6 new members that joined during the month of April: Jack Bethune ( talk · contribs) Jordan Timothy James Busson ( talk · contribs) Limetolime ( talk · contribs) Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim Fan ( talk · contribs) Mm40 ( talk · contribs) Redmarkviolinist ( talk · contribs) This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all! New GA Review Process - Review Subpages In case you haven't noticed, we initiated a new process for GA Reviews at the end of last month. The {{ GA nominee}} template was modified to direct new reviews initiated on an article to begin on a subpage of article talkspace (e.g. [[Talk:Article/GA#]], where '#' is the current number of GA reviews conducted for the article, incremented automatically, starting with 1). The primary reason for this change is to address some concerns made by several Wikipedians that previous GA reviews are not easily accessible in archives, the way that featured article reviews and peer reviews are, since the review is conducted on the article's talkspace, instead of in a subpage of the featured article space or peer review space. The reason we opted to move GA reviews to article talkspace (instead of GA space) is to better maintain the personal relationship between editor(s) and reviewer(s) by keeping reviews done in an area where editors can easily access it. Nonetheless, we still desired to have better archiving and maintenance of past reviews, so that GA ultimately becomes more accountable. When an article is nominated, the nominator adds the template using a substitution, by adding {{subst:GAN|subtopic=<name of subtopic for article at GAN>}}, as well as lists the article (as usual) at WP:GAN in the appropriate category. When a reviewer initiates a review of an article, all that needs to be done is to read the template on the article's {{ GA nominee}} template on its talk page, and click on the link to start the review. When the reviewer clicks on that link, they will also see some instructions on how to start a review of a GAN. For new reviewers, there's also a link to the Good Article criteria, as well as to the Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles page and the mentors list. Once an article is reviewed, the GA review page should be transcluded onto the main article talk page, by adding {{Talk:Article/GA#}} to the bottom of the talk page. This is to ensure maintain the transparency of the GA process, as well as to make editors of the article in question aware that the review is taking place. When an article is either passed or failed, there's really nothing different to do in the process, although reviewers are encouraged to utilize the {{ ArticleHistory}} template, linking to the GA review subpage with the 'action#link' parameter. Did You Know... ... that there are slightly more than twice as many Good Articles (4,266) as there are Featured Articles? ... that Giggy has some really neat and useful tools to assist reviewers in conducting their reviews? ... that there are ten experienced reviewers listed on the GA mentors list that can offer assistance or a second opinion in reviewing articles? From the Editors A GA working party has initiated discussion on ways to improve the Good Article project and processes. The goal of the working party is to come up with suggestions for improvement based on recent issues and concerns raised in the past, primarily in the wake of the Great Green Dot Debate of May 2008. The discussion can be found here. Members of the working party include: Dank55 ( talk · contribs), Derek.cashman ( talk · contribs), EyeSerene ( talk · contribs), Giggy ( talk · contribs), Gwinva ( talk · contribs), LaraLove ( talk · contribs), Nehrams2020 ( talk · contribs), and OhanaUnited ( talk · contribs). Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here. Contributors to this Issue Dr. Cash (Lead Editor) Giggabot, Giggy (Distributor) Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005! WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia. Nominations: Madame X (album) ( talk | history | start review) • Gedling Town F.C. ( talk | history | start review) • Reggie Barnes (skateboarder) ( talk | history | start review) • Exile (American band) ( talk | history | start review) • Jude Law ( talk | history | start review) Reassessment: Louie Caporusso • Northallerton • Patrick Omameh • Task forces: Project quality • Sweeps • GAN Backlog Drives • GA Cup WikiProject Good articles newsletter (last updated January 2013) Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log Nominations list |

Delivered by the automated Giggabot ( stop!) 01:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Would you mind putting some protection on Team Fortress 2? Its been hit by a lot of vandalism over the last few days. Thanks. -- Sabre ( talk) 10:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about the Vortigaunt then, the image we have should do. Thanks anyway. As for Myst, I'm slowly progressing through Myst III (Voltic's down, two to go), I doubt I'm going to have it in the bag before you've already done it (seriously man, you're a machine), however, I've just finished reading the last of the three novels and since I just sent Day of Defeat: Source to GAN, there's nothing stopping me from helping—the Half-Life stuff can wait a while, I've been doing too much Valve stuff recently. I'll be able to work on the Characters of Myst and the Myst canon articles, I just won't be able to add specialised information on them past Myst III at the moment. But I'll at least be able to set the groundwork for them. By "five main games" I presume you're not familiar with Uru then? -- Sabre ( talk) 15:26, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Atrus' family tree: is it really necessary? It's rather large and looks awfully messy in Atrus' section. Surely it would be better to do away with it and make sure all the relevant connections are made in the prose of the articles and relevant mediums (ie, Kahlis doesn't appear outside of Book of Ti'ana). -- Sabre ( talk) 17:32, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Saw you message on talk:WikiProject Books, are you still looking for that review? Let me know. -- Captain-tucker ( talk) 23:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

It's specifically for the audio book version, here is the abstract: The article reviews the book "Halo: Contact Harvest," by Joseph Staten and read by Holter Graham and Jen Taylor. Not sure if I should post the whole thing here, do you want to email me your email address and I will send it to you. -- Captain-tucker ( talk) 01:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

There is an up-and-coming project there and it seems that you would be interested. You seem to have a lot of expieience with FAs and I suggest that you go take a look. Have a good day :-)   Mm 40 ( talk | contribs)  15:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I see that you've joined. Could you go through King Arthur and look at the writing? Maybe improve it? Thanks.   Mm 40 ( talk | contribs)  15:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I started reading from the bottom (Machinima) and several fixes were required. I will look at the rest later. If it seems close, I'll just copy-edit as I'm reading and see if we can't get it promoted. If not, I'll leave more comments. -- Laser brain (talk) 14:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I will be happy to help in copyediting The Quest to Reclaim Releeshahn. You'll need to give me a couple of days, but I will help, since I enjoyed that game a great deal (although I didn't care for the Edanna stage; at a certain point, I had to resort to mindless clicking around – felt to me like the designers put aesthetics ahead of gameplay). If you don't hear from me by Tuesday, please drop me a reminder. Cheers! –  Scartol •  Tok 10:44, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

I've finished my copyedit. Comments are on the talk page. Cheers! –  Scartol •  Tok 14:37, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

I've got a question about the Myst: Book of D'Ni article you might be able to answer. See: Talk:The_Myst_Reader#Book_of_D.27Ni -- DanielPharos ( talk) 12:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 06:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Mission 4, a series of articles on the Everglades, could do with help from the FA-Team! Thanks! Awadewit ( talk) 12:58, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mysteria Film Group, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mysteria Film Group. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TheRealFennShysa ( talk) 17:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey, would you be interested in working together on this article? Or if not, do you know anyone who enjoys playing this game or games like this and would be interested in working on the article? You've been working on Myst articles, and so now I've become nostalgic for old (1+ year) games; I'm a pretty big fan of the Myst series, but Maxis is probably my favorite game developer of all time and I'd love to work on this. Gary King ( talk) 15:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Civilization 4 is another article I'd like to work on; it's another great intellectually challenging game, like SimCity and Myst, in my opinion. Gary King ( talk) 16:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I'd like to also note that "Development" sections are probably my biggest weakness in video game articles, so I will need some help there especially. You seem to find some pretty good sources for those. Where do you go to find them? Gary King ( talk) 17:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Random drive-by comment: I love SimCity4 and if you need a copyeditor or peer reviewer when you are done drop me a note and I would be happy to help. I never "got" Civ 4 (though Civ 3 was awesome) so I probably won't be much help there. Karanacs ( talk) 21:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I'll make a note of that. I've never had someone copyedit any of my articles before... at least, I don't think so, so this would be nice. Gary King ( talk) 05:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Very good point. It is rough now and basically amounts to a collection of examples. I need to remove editors' names first of all to make it about the page and not about editors. Then I need to make sure the examples demonstrate the overall negative effect of the page. I think the people that are really interested in the GA process will do it regardless of the existence of an awards center. -- Laser brain (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

In an amazing measure of our turnaround... thanks for the comment on the Hulk page. I agree that stripping out most of ALL the fictional bios, esp. in comics, where the serial nature leads to perma-creep, would be great, It would be great if we could reduce most of the comic bios to the essential nature of a character -

'When Shang-chi found out his father was an international crimelord, he resolved to fix the dishonor his father brought to his family, and turned his amazing Kungfu skills to fighting his father's criminal empire. Over the years, he has been a part of several groups to combat this. Some time ago, he discovered he was dying of cancer, and has redoubled his efforts to fight crime before the cancer overcomes him.'

end of Fict bio. Like that, for almost all of them, except where serious scholarly work has been done, like bats, supes, and spidey(and, of course, Hulk). I also am glad to see you supporting the current format there. I think it's ready to go under the GA review again. thoughts? ThuranX ( talk) 18:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed you have been making a substantial number of edits to the Wipeout 3 article, removing the part that outlines the differences between the original and the Special editions, which I can't see merged back in other parts of the article. So I'd like to know the specific reasons over this modification, or if it's just a temporary thing, and you intend to put them back later. Thanks. -- Lashiec ( talk) 17:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Sadly, a quick research shows that the game went largely ignored by gaming sites, which didn't even bother to test it. The only sources I found are MobyGames (very brief), and a dedicated Wipeout forum, which has a more detailed look. Although considering the strict considerations for something to be considered a reliable source, I don't think these two could make the cut. -- Lashiec ( talk) 17:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Kevin Rorabaugh, “How Hardcore Are You? Your proudest gaming moments: The next contestant in our monthly harder-core-than-thou competition arrives!” in Electronic Gaming Monthly 228 (May 2008): 10. Made a potato launching replica of the M41 SSR MAV/AW Rocket Launcher from Halo; features a photograph as well and set aside from other letters to the editor in special colored box in magazine Anyway, I am notifying you and some others know in case if either believe it can be used in the articles (I am not a Halo expert per se and believe that while I found the source and I believe it useful, someone else may know better than m what to do with it). Sincerely, -- Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles ^Tally-ho! 01:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I was looking around at random stuff and stumbled upon Michael Salvatori's article. I saw that it was proposed for deletion and someone suggested giving it six months to see if someone would expand it. Well, it's been six months and it remains quite the model stub. I've always kind of seen articles notability by their poetential; ie. If there's no hope of getting up to GA, then why bother? Now, he's obviously a good composer or he wouldn't have lasted this many years with Bungie; which gives him a pretty good resume if he ever wanted to move on as a lead composer or similar project. But I currently don't think there are enough sources to build a solid article (especially stuff about his childhood, etc.). I figured I'd contact you directly since you were involved in the previous discussion. Thoughts? Black ngold29 05:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

David, what do you think about aiming for the July 14 Dispatch on the Rick Block interview (unless something else comes up). Will it be long enough? If not, do you want to add User:Brighterorange (dash fixing script) to it? Please respond at WT:FCDW so everyone is in the loop. SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 05:05, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 08:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Image:Ilb phone call.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Ilb phone call.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs ( talk) 00:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)