This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Katherine Johnson. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, first of all, for the page protection on Super Size Me – I have tired of fighting the (almost certainly orchestrated) campaign of vandalism.
Secondly, thanks for the comment regarding my name. I was named for Bonnie Prince Charlie and had family, both Irish and Scottish, at Culloden. Cheers! --- The Old Jacobite The '45 02:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Last week, you blocked User:Blackheartedkid, but I believe there is a sockpuppet of this account under User:JackHood that edited briefly before Blackheartedkid and then started again less than one day after Blackheartedkid was blocked. Both users edit Heroes articles and upload non-free images mostly to be included in the Sylar article. JackHood's first edit after Blackheartedkid was blocked was to asked to be unblocked even though that account was not blocked. Aspects ( talk) 09:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
You declined a report at AIV as insufficiently warned. However, warnings are not needed in long term abuse and block evasion. This user has their own abuse filter ( filter 777) created by MusikAnimal per this request based on prolonged abuse documented at User:EvergreenFir/socks#Southwest. MusikAnimal, JamesBWatson, and Widr have all blocks these IPs, so this amount to block evasion as well. Please block the IP in question. EvergreenFir (talk) 01:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
I am unsure of what was on the page, but the reason given for deletion was "Non-notable athlete". It seems that the first Japanese man to win the Mr. Universe competition (amateur) would make him notable. Winning the contest at all should do that, let alone being the first Japanese man to do so. Arnold Schwarzenegger was likewise an amateur title holder of the contest, and it brought him a lot of recognition.
On a related note, if the Universe Championships violated the "WP:Sports event" rules, why not reclassify it? If Miss America is acceptable (originally - and arguably still strongly - based on appearance, rather than accomplishments) can have a page, why not this?
One of my big concerns is that removal of the Shigeru Sugita page appears to minimise the accomplishment of an Asian athlete in a time when representation and diversity are more important than ever. Surely there is a way to get this content to adhere to WP guidelines.
Indigotraveler ( talk) 10:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Dear Ad Orientem, I believe you decided to delete the page with the english translation of https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theo_Kanter. I did the translation while updating the content and adding external references and sources. Thus, I am in need of some guidance why this supporting evidence of external source is insufficient for publications. It may be so that I missed things due to unfamiliarity with the Wikipedia editing environment but this was never pointed out on the Swedish page. Please help me by pointing out exactly what is missing, because I have no problem adding sources as long I understand exactly what would be regarded as sufficient. Also, please help me to move back the content once it is acceptable as I put some effort in this and would like to avoid redoing all the work. Yours sincerely Theo Kanter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkanter ( talk • contribs) 14:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, you were kind enough to lift my recent temporary editing ban but in doing so you seemed to raise WP:consensus to a seemingly impossible standard of crystal clear consensus. The involved parties have agreed that consensus is based upon quality of an arguments and common sense WP:EL. The reasoning in the discussion at WP:External_links/Noticeboard#Beacham_Theatre is becoming increasingly subjective. I feel that crystal clear anything is going to be next to impossible. Last, apparent WP:local consensus is not the same as WP:Consensus but it would greatly impact clarity. Crystal clear consensus is an impossible standard. Could you please me offer guidance or point be to a resource to help resolve this dilemma? Thank you, Johnvr4 ( talk) 18:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Greetings! I notice someone PROD'd the Mr. Universe competition, and it managed to go the week. You did, of course, correctly remove it per due process. Unfortunately, I can't see why it managed to get the PROD treatment - this is a world renowned body building competition, where Arnold Schwarzenegger, Steve Reeves, John Grimek, (and others) came to fame. An international contest with nearly 70 years of history, and subject of a TIME retrospective. What are the chances we could get it restored so any necessary improvements could be made? Thanks in advance! Scr★pIron IV 15:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi you recently blocked the above user, I haven't seen an unblock request and the user is continuing to add unsourced and probably false information and has recently created a page that I am sure is a hoax. If he has been blocked how can he continue to edit? thanks Domdeparis ( talk) 19:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Just a heads up, a 3-month block on a dynamic IP address isn't going to stop them. Would you be willing to perform a 3 month block on this IPV6 2001:8003:251F:1C00::/64 ( block range · block log ( global) · WHOIS (partial)). Thanks. 172.58.40.31 ( talk) 22:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, the page Jean-Marie Riachi which you deleted is about a very successful Lebanese composer who composed many hit songs for famous Arab singers like Elissa (Lebanese singer). I kindly ask you to put it back. * https://twitter.com/JeanMarieRiachi
-- Salah Almhamdi ( talk) 21:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
I read your involvement with the recent dispute between the two editors. Therefore, I wonder whether a non-admin mediator is needed. I may have slightly been acquainted with GregJackP, who is currently "retired" from Wikipedia. I want to speak to
GregJackP, but I don't know whether he wants to speak to me because... well, I was horrible poor listener back then and was more interested in winning debates. I don't know whether Greg will see how much I've changed in the last few months. Over recent months, I have grown to listen to others and... accepted the consensus and reluctantly gave people what they want, even when I somewhat disagree.
JordanGero? I don't know him much; Jordan and I never interacted for the first time. However, maybe I can speak to him about his behavior. I have been mediating in some disputes before. I wonder whether I'm the right person to mediate. --
George Ho (
talk) 05:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Shall I let this slide? I already collapsed it. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Probably should be indeffed per WP:NOTHERE and talk page access removed. [1] -- NeilN talk to me 01:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ad_Orientem, That seems to have come in from the cold. I see there is still no quality verifiable references for a BLP on it. scope_creep ( talk) 02:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem, I see you doing a lot of good work around the place with your new tools. Just one thing: it may be worth adding a few words in humanspeak in a case like this, in preference to an ill-fitting template. (I just did, so no worries.) Bishonen | talk 09:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC).
Excuse me, could you protect each of the Love & Hip Hop pages, please?! Vandalizing is out of control!! Zhyboo ( talk) 16:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Ju Portuguese ( talk · contribs · uploads) Added to the SPI case. Note the nonsense userpage edits likely just done to achieve autoconfirmed status and enable uploads. Also note that this account was created well before the block...perhaps CheckUser should be requested to find the rest? — Train2104 ( t • c) 22:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
I just want to thank you for welcoming me to wikipedia. I have actually considered creating an account over here for quite a some time, but never found enough time to actually get into it. But thanks to you, I might even create the account very soon. ^^
Live Long and Prosper, said Spock and I may say it to you aswell! 88.115.74.89 ( talk) 23:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)V
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emmett Till. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Please revert and revoke talkpage access. Thanks. 172.56.38.75 ( talk) 01:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I was told that you performed the page deletion at Wei Han because it appears to pertain to earlier discussions dated 2005 and 2015. Based on my understanding, the 2005 discussion is irrelevant to the 2015's and probably referred to a different person. Back in 2015, it was more about her notability. I think after the 89th Academy Awards on Feb 26, 2017 her page should definitely be restored to the most recent creation because so many Oscars-nominated/winning movies like Jackie (2016 film), Hacksaw Ridge, Loving (2016 film) would not have been successful, had it not been the efforts of her and her company Bliss Media. With all these piracy going on in the movie business, we need people like her to keep independent film-making going. I hope you could please reverse your deletion. Thanks. Supermann ( talk) 02:44, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
Could you also delete this edit? Harizotoh9 ( talk) 23:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Some more: Here, here, and here. Harizotoh9 ( talk) 23:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
I also made a post on BLP Notice board about this topic. I do not believe that the Daily Dot is a reliable source.
Harizotoh9 ( talk) 23:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
I think it's pretty clear cut. Dailydot is just some internet blog. Ergo not a reliable source. Harizotoh9 ( talk) 00:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I saw you declined the BLP PROD here for sources. It had no sources when placed and the only sources placed after were FB and Twitter, which from my understanding don't save you from WP:BLPPROD once it is placed. TonyBallioni ( talk) 15:05, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
I've done the newbie helping gig before and would be glad to help. Just let me know where to go. White Arabian Filly Neigh 16:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem. You have semiprotected Lordship of Biscay. I rather wish you'd undo that, because I had already blocked the disruptive IP and their range. The other IP is editing constructively AFAICS. Please see this ANI thread and this on my page. Bishonen | talk 21:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC).
Hi Ad Orientem. Texians is correct. I requested the change to "Texians" at the page for reporting errors, and it was duly changed. Please change it back to "Texians", which is the correct contemporary demonym for the time of the Republic of Texas. -- Trovatore ( talk) 20:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Will I be banned if i swear in wikepida? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.235.108.54 ( talk) 01:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
I feel that the page you deleted Matthew Kjellberg wasn't promotion at all, I created that page for my client as I'm his publicist. I think a "Twitter is not a reference" kind of reason shouldn't require a Page Deletion.
Aprilotenberg ( talk) 07:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Hate to bug you, but you were part of an AfD discussion back in 2015 regarding the subject of the above draft. I think the current draft barely passes notability standards, but cannot see the deleted draft. Would you mind having a looksee? The draft has been sitting out there for a few months, and I'd like to respond to the editor. I would have asked the AfD closer, but they haven't been active since the end of January. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 00:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Can you please revoke talk page access for this IP that you blocked? The IP looks to be cut and pasting content from articles onto the the talk page. Many Thanks. Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 13:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem, please could you restore my draft article "The World At Mind's End" (music album) by the band Skywhale. I am trying to improve it along with the article about the band. You deleted on February 13, 2017Thank you, Cjcooper ( talk) 20:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
FYI: That user you set up mentoring for, User:Izaiah.morris, seems to be going on his merry way without seeking or receiving any assistance from designated mentor User:Oshwah. Several problematic edits and a re-creation of Splix.io which was just speedy-deleted for a fourth time. Funcrunch ( talk) 16:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Ok I won't edit yet.
I wasn't going to bug an admin to block User:RockHarper again just yet for his edits on MasterChef Junior (U.S. season 5), I figured I'd be nice and give him another warning to see if he finally changes his ways. But it is appreciated that you stepped in and took care of it. I'm guessing the details I laid out gave enough of an example as to the disruption he continues to cause to the page. So once again, thanks for stepping in and helping out, it is greatly appreciated. - SanAnMan ( talk) 19:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Any chance you could do the edit protection asap? The editor is continuing to try and make cut & paste moves. Cheers, Number 5 7 01:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Ad Orientem, I admit that in page Anti-corruption foundation there was 1 paragraph that I took from site of that organization.
All other several paragraphs were wrote without copyright infringement.
So why did you delete ALL page instead of only 1 paragraph?
Can you restore this page without that paragraph in order I rewrite it?
p.s. Do you speak Russian? Kap677-2 ( talk) 20:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
You told me to let you know if he ignored your warning. He did. I reverted his edits so far. TBMNY ( talk) 02:30, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
You refused my proposed deletion of the article sewage waste energy. You said "names can be changed". What do you mean by that? Did you review the discussion we've had about the article here? The conclusion was clear. Also, the person who started the article never responded to any attempts to discuss this; instead, he/she added a link to this new article in a number of other pages which I found disruptive. If you prefer not to have it deleted then the other option is to place a redirect to sewage sludge treatment. EMsmile ( talk) 19:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Would you have a moment to look at the edits of Bloomdoom2? I reported this at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xboxmanwar three weeks ago. If this is the same editor, they were a huge time-sink and a very destructive editor. If I go to ANI it will be an hour preparing diffs, but if it's the sock it's very simple. Thanks. Magnolia677 ( talk) 02:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
I saw this too late, and think deleting this article was entirely lame. -- Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 16:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
As you were the blocking admin for IP User talk:117.103.88.85 the IP has returned on User talk:117.103.88.77 making the same edits and Vandalizing the same articles. Geolocate puts them both at Oceania Country Marshall Islands. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 01:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
As I suspected they have returned on another IP. Geolocates to the Marshall Islands just like the others. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 05:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Re. this, see WP:ATTREQ, and things like this, where the violations were removed but the page was subsequently still deleted under the criteria. Loads more examples in my log, but of course- ironically- I can't see them any more :) Just FYI. Take care! — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 18:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kevin O'Leary. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Evil bullet ( talk) 08:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC) Deletion of /info/en/?search=Upacking_List
Please, could you provide an information about what I can change in my page to make it appear on Wikipedia? I've added usefull links and deleted every marketing issue from previous version. What can I do more? Thank you & have a good day) Evil bullet ( talk) 08:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Evil bullet
That user you've attempted to mentor, User:Izaiah.morris, appears to be ignoring your advice on his talk page, and has gone ahead and recreated that Clay DeBord article both in draft and mainspace. Funcrunch ( talk) 15:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Oh my goodness I'm sorry for the misunderstanding i will ask Ad Orientum before i make that article. But i also need some help with it and wouldn't mind if you cold find some help on that article. I'm sure you can tell i'm not messing around and vandilising. I just want to get this article done before someone else makes it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Izaiah.morris ( talk • contribs) 15:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your earlier help with the previous sockpuppet. I wanted to let you know that I started a new investigation into a new editor, User:EthanSylar, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JackHood, if you wanted to take a look and provide any other evidence. Aspects ( talk) 14:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
I saw the WCPW World Championship article and I think that is notable and as very sources can you remove the criteria for speedy deletion (CSD G5)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProWrestlingLover123 ( talk • contribs) 14:48, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
A bot removed the protection template from Carlo M. Croce, which you had protected. It needed protection, because it was under constant revision and deletion by SPAs with a declared or undeclared relationship with the subject. I'm not sure what the status is now, but you might want to look at it and see if the bot screwed it up. -- Nbauman ( talk) 21:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't look like your final warning had much of an impact. TimothyJosephWood 20:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, Ad Orientem, for posting a warning about having an edit war. I have created and contributed to the Ali Shilatifard page for about three years, simply adding scientific accomplishments. The page has recently come under a barrage of edits including removing awards, making comments about "not necessarily major" discoveries (which have now been completely removed), and insisting on a COI and placing a COI template box over and over again, even though the page is very neutral and sourced. This type of unsubstantiated edits should not be allowed. I have attempted to use the appropriate channels of communication, including "cleaning up" the page, writing polite comments on Talk pages (which are deleted rather than responded to by Natureium and now a number IP address). If you could kindly please help stop these edits and block the placement of the COI template box on the Ali Shilatifard article, it would be greatly appreciated. This page is helpful in bringing attention to the important work that Dr. Shilatifard and his colleagues are doing on childhood leukemia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnolia007 ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
On 24 March 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Denis Voronenkov, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 02:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. You deleted Great Depression (Defiance, Ohio album), The Fear, the Fear, the Fear and Midwestern Minutes because Defiance, Ohio (band) was deleted in error. I'm wondering if you could reverse this. -- Evanw ( talk) 15:11, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry it was The Great Depression (Defiance, Ohio album) the albums weren't deleted for lack of notability they were deleted because the page for Defiance, Ohio (band) was deleted for lack of sources. I had the page restored and re wrote it with sources. Defiance, Ohio is one of the most prominent bands in the wave of DIY punk in the mid-late 00s. They had multiple tours of the USA, Canada, Iceland, and Europe. Their albums were reviewed on notable music websites see: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] These albums have had significant impact on punk and are worthy to have an article dedicated to them.
On the recreation page for these articles it says to message the user who deleted them with concerns, let me know if you would rather me direct these concerns to WP:DELREV.
-- Evanw ( talk) 23:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Template:Sony Franchises was deleted by you as "Unused, redundant template", but it has 31 transclusions. Please restore it and send it to WP:TFD if you want to have it deleted. 98.230.196.215 ( talk) 22:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
User:RockHarper went right back to vandalizing the page at MasterChef Junior (U.S. season 5), this time adding junk details to the table. Seems he didn't get your message about behaving better. - SanAnMan ( talk) 22:40, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your action. We'll see if it helps. --- The Old Jacobite The '45 16:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would you look over this ANI thread and close it? here The issue of the disruptive closing of the RfC has been sorted and appears past-ready for a close. Thanks. SW3 5DL ( talk) 17:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Could I get you to reinstate your block of Das osmnezz? Shortly after you granted their unblock request we this. Calling Ohayon's performance "auspicious" may not be the most egregious NPOV-violation, but shows pretty clearly that they still don't get it. Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 13:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
It's been quiet for awhile but the IP range block you placed on the IP vandal in Oceania is back Geolocate matches as does the vandalizing edits from before. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 11:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
You are not going to flipping believe this they're back. Same edits, same geo, same everything, ugh. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 03:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I guess you deleted S. N. Sadasivan on the grounds that it was a direct copy of the biographical article present elsewhere in the internet. It was tagged with speedy deletion and I was notified of it. But I had thoroughly rewritten the article, expanded and augmented it with references. I had contested the deletion request but couldnt see any replies to it. I would like to know if you could throw some light on the issue. thanks in advance. -- Challiyan ( talk) 17:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi, I'm probably going to do an RFC soon, asking whether people support your proposed lead paragraph, and not mentioning the other options, except maybe the present version. Good job on your version, BTW. Anyway, I am coming here merely to ask whether you have thought of any improvements since proposing it. If so, then I would do the RFC on the improved version. One qualm I have is the word "current", per WP:Current, but I can support the word "current" if you don't have any problem with it. Seems to me the word "incumbent" connotes more permanence than the word "current", but it's not a big deal. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 21:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
e/c@ Anythingyouwant: Ad Orientem's proposed sentence is gaining consensus. Your proposal for another RfC with sentences you select seeks to overturn that. Once again, you are rushing in to over turn a gathering consensus just as you did earlier with the RfC you have running now. That RfC solves nothing. All it did was stop the consensus. And here you are straight out saying you're going to do it again. No, I oppose this continuing disruption. SW3 5DL ( talk) 22:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).
Since apparently only you can change the lead sentence of Donald Trump away from the current version which no longer has anyone arguing for it, could you please do so as soon as possible? I don't mind if it's your version or this one [11] which is a less radical change. Siuenti ( talk) 22:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
I did not change his edit. He changed mine here. I had already closed it. He could have added the bits about the #17 consensus without wiping out my close. So please, I was restoring my edit as he's not my Daddy. He's another editor who should respect my close. Please go and undo your edit. Thanks. SW3 5DL ( talk) 21:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Isn't this [12] edit warring too? I've made 944 edits to that article and the images of the paintings need to be seen; this is an article about visual art - and its a long standing issue that visual art needs to be seen. This editor wolfowitz misinterprets the imagery rules constantly and consistently; removing images from this encyclopedia to suit his whim, with extremely dubious rationales... Modernist ( talk) 23:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
Thank you for cutting a stubborn knot with a great edit. Well done. Please stick around over there. SW3 5DL ( talk) 03:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 12:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem. I saw the comments regarding Abraham Bolden you made in FTN a few months back. You may recall that Chicago plot to assassinate President John F. Kennedy once existed separate from Abraham Bolden. The story that there was a Chicago plot originates from Bolden, so I agree with whomever made the decision to redirect the former to the later. I think having the redirect work the other way gives undue credence to Bolden's fabricated story. (See also Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard/Archive_42#Chicago_plot_to_assassinate_President_John_F._Kennedy.) I also think this is an article that needs to be watched very closely, especially since various mainstream news sources who are ignorant of the full history frequently reiterate Bolden's claims as fact. For example, here is one by Ebony that has popped up since I began my Wikibreak: [13]. Anyway, hope you are well! - Location ( talk) 04:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
To whom it may concern:
Please do not get offended but I am currently pursuing my Master and Doctoral Degrees in Theology.
Accordingly, the Catholic and Christian Orthodox faith were united as one until the great schism.
My recent edit was only meet to draw distinction between the Catholic and Christian Orthodox churches.
I pray that one day these two Christian Churches can set aside their differences and be reunited once again.
In the true spirit of humanity we need dialogue first before summarily dismissing ones opinion.
Take the utmost care, Giorgos Trifon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giorgos Trifon ( talk • contribs) 10:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
The assertion about "conspiracy theories" in the Bill Murphy entry is disparaging and unsourced. It should be removed. Besides, there's no "theory" when government officials meet in secret to develop and implement courses of action. In many respects government is OFTEN "conspiracy." — Preceding unsigned comment added by CXPowell ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
This user that you blocked for 24 hours is an obvious sock of LTA User:Catcreekcitycouncil. For the record, even if this isn't this sockmaster, they've created another account here. Thank you. 212.199.114.161 ( talk) 22:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Wack-a-mole time. See [14] by User:Sunuprugs Meters ( talk) 23:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Well, I'm sorry I missed the fun - would be curious to know what was at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jeh . Jeh ( talk) 03:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Fleming (American politician). Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Dear Ad Orientem:
I have just today noticed that you deleted the article about the Canadian company Taraspan. The reason given by the PRODing editor, SwisterTwister was that the article had been created in contravention of the paid editing policy, that the article was promotional, and that the references were mainly warmed-over press releases. It's true that the original draft article was very promotional, and was created by an intern working at the company. It had been previously deleted twice for this reason. However, it was created a year before the paid editing policy was created, and it was properly posted in WP:AFC, where COI material is allowed until reviewed and de-fluffed. Accordingly, I rewrote the text to include just facts, and added multiple references to articles in mainstream Canadian newspapers. While some of the ones I added do include quotes from the company's founders, this is because they were interviewed by journalists, and none of the interviewee's words were used to support the text, only those of the journalists. I moved the draft to mainspace when I felt that it was adequately supported.
I didn't see the PROD at the time. If I had, I would have removed it and added more references, such as this one from the national newspaper The Globe and Mail and this one from the National Post.
Unless you object, I plan to reinstate the article and add the two extra references. If SwisterTwister still thinks that the article can't be made acceptable through editing, he can always take it to WP:AFD.— Anne Delong ( talk) 15:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering why you deleted the page on James Rajasekar— your deletion logs cut out part of your explanation with ellipses. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasterEditor500 ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
The "Hassane" page you deleted was linking to me "Hazzane" as there was no such user as "Hassane" and couldn't create/register my account with the user "Hassane". I'm Hassane Let's Talk! 23:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
With regard to this discussion [15]: This is by no means the first time the issue has come up, and it's pretty clearly a settled one by now. See, for example, Talk:List of 20th-century women artists#Deleting valid and important images, Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_February_24#Frank_Auerbach, Talk:Kay Sage#Images and Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_January_31#File:Untitled_painting_by_Larry_Poons.2C_ca.1964.jpg. Modernist doesn't accept fundamental elements of NFC use policy (and says as much here Talk:Abstract_expressionism/Archive#Images_2), but has had no success in changing it (and it is basically WMF policy, not merely local policy). Basic NFC enforcement is exempt from edit warring limits, for good reason; and when matters are as clearly settled as this one there's no need for repeating the same discussions ad nauseam -- especially when Modernist trots out bad faith claims of vandalism and all-caps edit summaries like "YOU ARE TOTALLY WRONG" rather than arguments rooted in policy or guideline. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. ( talk) 11:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
IMO, continuing to omit 2017 Nangarhar airstrike from ITN is not reasonable when it remains a prominent topic on mainstream news outlets and the death toll, according to Afghani officials, has risen to more than 90. Suggest reopen. Sca ( talk) 14:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I already put in a request for talk page protection but I figured it might be wise to add protection to my user page as well, at least temporarily. I would also appreciate a longer block on the talk page . Thanks ahead of time ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 15:17, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. The article Kulbhushan Yadav was moved to its current title Kulbhushan Jadhav. Since you posted his news on ITN, would you be able to correct his spelling there? Thanks in advance. Mar4d ( talk) 01:14, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem! I was reviewing this user's contributions for repeated COPYVIO edits, but I can't find which edits (other than maybe the first one) that introduced them. Am I missing something? Can you list these edits so I can take a look? ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hey Ad, I know you were tracking the constant disruptive editing of RockHarper ( talk · contribs), well he is doing the same type of disruptive edits as before, mostly again on MasterChef Junior (U.S. season 5). I tried giving him one last final warning with no luck. What's your call on this? - SanAnMan ( talk) 01:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
They've gone and made another copyright violation, so they still don't get it. Regards. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 23:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
With the 1RR on DT, does that mean that if you revise content, and that gets reverted, and you then come back and revise the same content again less than 24 hours later, is that a 1RR violation? SW3 5DL ( talk) 19:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
{e/c] I'm not all that familiar with the sanctioning on ArbCom pages. but these edits seem to me to be violating 1RR imposed on DT, and there are more like them.
SW3 5DL ( talk) 19:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Ad Orientem: Will you be commenting on the article talk page? SW3 5DL ( talk) 19:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
I didn't know you wanted a copy here. I've seen admins move discussions from their page to article/user talk pages without leaving a copy. Also, can you please comment on the article talk page now? Thanks. SW3 5DL ( talk) 22:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Before I screw up another article move, a few editors moved this article to the Venezuelan economic crisis of 2013–17 article without discussion. They did the "2-title move", where you cannot revert the moves and need an administrator to make edits. I originally made the article since there is an Economic policy of the Hugo Chávez government article. The move was unnecessary since there is already a Crisis in Bolivarian Venezuela article. Your help would be greatly appreciated!-- ZiaLater ( talk) 00:06, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Please consider spending some time as a page moderator on DT. You are very good at sorting things. I think the other editors would appreciate it as much as I would. Thanks. SW3 5DL ( talk) 01:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
I did reply to your comment on Anything's talk but he reverted it so here it is: I understand completely, and I see that you are involved. Your warning to him is the first refreshing thing I've seen in a bit. And yes, I too must dial that back, but I am fully prepared to defend it. SW3 5DL ( talk) 14:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
FYI, probable WP:EVASION: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jlind0. Murph9000 ( talk) 15:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
FYI: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft_talk%3AEladio_del_Valle&type=revision&diff=777003803&oldid=777001943. - Location ( talk) 19:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
They must've seen you're not interested in fighting it and have tried to get someone else involved here: on Jim1138's page
Love.Live.Life
Hey Jim, I see you've reverted the user Masheenya on Cover Drive. Can you also revert them on Love.Live.Life? I've gone up to my three-revert limit there, but they have added unsourced content there as well and used a dead link to attempt to cover it up. Ss 112 20:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Can you try and sort something out please? Masheenya ( talk) 20:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Would like to understand why Rubique company page was deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheetal mayekar ( talk • contribs) 05:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Would be grateful if you could supply me with a copy of the content of the Nubyen page you recently deleted so I can make amendments towards Wikipedia compliance. Much thanks. Finn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drfinn ( talk • contribs) 08:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Ad
I'm coming here to tell you on why you deleted that why?
Because she is not notable because she doesn't have a "reliable source" or because I'm not good making articles and they are all bad? or just because I'm not welcome here in Wikipedia, when I just want help and let the readers know about British Wrestling, tell me why? Why?
Why could you not ask at least for someone to improve it?
Thanks for your time
TheBuilder456 ( talk) 14:33, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
P.s: I prefer a hard and rough truth than a delusional lie, also if it is to undelete how can I do that or what should I do? Because listen I just want to know the basic of Wikipedia and what I have to do to retain my articles and where I can find reliable sources about professional wrestling.
(Comment moved from the top of the talk page)
Why di dyou dlete my wikiepdia entry? He told me peronally via instagram his ethnioc background!!! that is the source -(unsigned comment from Nicholas20177)
Excuse me but as i mentioned before, HE TOLD ME PERSONALLY. You cna't get more reliable than that! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholas20177 ( talk • contribs) 15:56, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Ad orientem, I don't think he's listening. So far he's added in ancestral backgrounds for
Linda McMahon, Chumlee, Paul Teutul Sr and Logan Sama only one of them had a source, (Paul Teutul Sr ) but it was a user-supplied resource and therefore fails WP:RS.
As you can see I've spoken to him about this, with a non-template message and his reply was fairly dismissive, and you've spoken to him and his response was to edit Paul Sr's article. He may need a more serious attention getter. Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ 16:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, it came to my attention that you have recently tagged the Iran–Israel proxy conflict as "ARBPIA" article, which is an apparent mistake and contrary to the WP:GS/SCW general sanctions, which were installed in order to cover Syrian Civil War-related articles and topics (see 2013 motion for more details). I assume your action was good faith and possibly motivated by erroneous talk page ARBPIA tagging on 9 February 2017 by user:Shrike ( notified), who must have not been aware that WP:GS/SCW general sanctions supersede ARBPIA in relevance to Syrian Civil War since the 2013 motion. The Iran–Israel proxy conflict has been tagged on talk page as WP:GS/SCW since February 2014 and should include Template:Editnotice SCW 1RR (not ARBPIA). Logically, you can also notice that Iran is not an Arab country, and hence Israeli-Iranian tensions are not part of the Arab-Israeli conflict, though are indeed relevant to the Syrian Civil War. GreyShark ( dibra) 18:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, i found more Syrian Civil War-related articles which were marked ARBPIA instead of SCW&ISIL sanctions. Could you change the 1RR notice as well at Hezbollah, January 2015 Shebaa farms incident, Imad Mughniyah? GreyShark ( dibra) 08:09, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
What's wrong with ethnic celebs? I used a source for Paul Sr! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholas20177 ( talk • contribs) 16:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
I have a book source for Rick Harrison. It's called: 'License to Pawn: Deals, Steals, and My Life at the Gold & Silver'. It says he is of Irish descent in the book so can i use the book as a reference? Do i just type in the name of the book when adding a reference i.e [1]?
As to the book, I checked it, it appears reliable, my only concern is it's about Rick Harrison, the son and not the older Rick Harrison, so the information may not be accurate for Rick Harrison Sr. Other than that, the book appears to be reliable. Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ 14:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
50.93.144.6 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
Hey,
It looks like you and User:Materialscientist conflicted different block durations for this IP. Just passing this along. Thanks. 59.166.130.102 ( talk) 02:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem, could you help out at this BLP? I've requested a user block and page protection--persistent addition of poorly sourced personal gossip. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm working through some of the early modern papal conclaves ( Papal conclave, 1724 was the first I started on, and now just expanded Papal conclave, May 1605 for DYK). I've noticed in some of the others that the sourcing is in my mind pretty bad. Namely, they rely on what I can tell are self-published sources this source typically for lists of electors and ones from this series for describing factions. The latter one appears to be by a classics professor, but have not gone through peer review. This also makes a lot of appearances in some of the articles. Doesn't look self-published, but I'm also not quite sure if the original publication would be RS.
The main reason I am asking is that there are several GAs from about 10 years ago that seem to be built on this sourcing (ex. Papal conclave, 1769). I'd personally feel very uncomfortable expanding any of the early modern stubs with the information, and have been removing the lists and expanding based on current scholarship. Just wanted to pick someone elses brain on for thoughts on the sourcing for the larger articles in the series. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Dear Ad Orientem,
As previously you have contributed to Wikipedia in regards to financial articles, would you, please, consider writing an article on Creamfinance? It is a global financial services company that provides personal finance products in emerging markets. The company was ranked as the second fastest-growing company in Europe in 2016. Creamfinance is employing over 220 people and operating in 7 countries both within and outside of Europe – Latvia, Poland, Czech Republic, Georgia, Denmark and Mexico with an IT office in Austria.
I believe it corresponds to the Wikipedia notability rules as it has been talked about in legitimate third party sources: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
If you wish I have put together a first draft for the page and can send it you.
According to Wikipedia guidelines I want to underline that I am a Project Manager at Golin Riga and I have been approached by Creamfinance to help with their representation on Wikipedia. Aozolins-golin-riga ( talk) 14:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
References
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/MOS:GENDERID for genderqueer people. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
The Saturday Night Live troll that you blocked a few weeks ago struck again. Thanks for your help. Sundayclose ( talk) 19:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
After he was reported and then blocked at Commons, he sent me a self-reverted FU message at English Wikipedia: [16]. He's done this before back in December 2016. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).
Hi, a few minutes ago, I pinged you in four separate sections on Talk:John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories. I am posting this message here so that you would not get the impression that wikipedia mistakenly pinged you multiple times. Thanks. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem. I saw you blocked the user Whippyice will for adding unsourced content after they were reported at ANV. I have reported the user Tjdrum2000 twice now at ANV for adding unsourced content and making disruptive edits in much the same vein as Whippyice will. They have been warned by various users for adding unsourced content across music and film articles and they are still doing it and refusing to explain these unsourced additions, provide any edit summaries, or change their behaviour. They have previously been blocked for disruptive editing. I don't think this fits something to be reported at ANI as that is a last resort and there's no back-and-forth edit warring, just the same disruption. Can you please take a look at this user and block if necessary? I don't think what else will get them to stop. Thank you. Ss 112 03:14, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
This editor, User:RoyGoldsmith, made an interesting, and very accurate assessment on trying to get things done on the DT article. here. I think it speaks to precisely why we need a moderator there. SW3 5DL ( talk) 18:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I intend to run Mireille Issa through Afd to see what happens, it might squeak through or not. Please undelete it and maybe encourage whoever prodded it to Afd it instead of me. Siuenti ( 씨유엔티) 22:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, AO, while I agree that a level 4 is appropriate when there is a hint of substantive editing, or when an IP editor is clearly not a SPA whose purpose is to vandalize. That isn't the case with this vandal. Look at the IP's edits since 2013 - not even one edit has been anything but vandalism. They've had ample warnings, but the vandalism continues. See these diffs and what was edited. It's garbage, and it's harmful to WP. Please block. Atsme 📞 📧 20:50, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Katherine Johnson. Legobot ( talk) 04:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, first of all, for the page protection on Super Size Me – I have tired of fighting the (almost certainly orchestrated) campaign of vandalism.
Secondly, thanks for the comment regarding my name. I was named for Bonnie Prince Charlie and had family, both Irish and Scottish, at Culloden. Cheers! --- The Old Jacobite The '45 02:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Last week, you blocked User:Blackheartedkid, but I believe there is a sockpuppet of this account under User:JackHood that edited briefly before Blackheartedkid and then started again less than one day after Blackheartedkid was blocked. Both users edit Heroes articles and upload non-free images mostly to be included in the Sylar article. JackHood's first edit after Blackheartedkid was blocked was to asked to be unblocked even though that account was not blocked. Aspects ( talk) 09:03, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
You declined a report at AIV as insufficiently warned. However, warnings are not needed in long term abuse and block evasion. This user has their own abuse filter ( filter 777) created by MusikAnimal per this request based on prolonged abuse documented at User:EvergreenFir/socks#Southwest. MusikAnimal, JamesBWatson, and Widr have all blocks these IPs, so this amount to block evasion as well. Please block the IP in question. EvergreenFir (talk) 01:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
I am unsure of what was on the page, but the reason given for deletion was "Non-notable athlete". It seems that the first Japanese man to win the Mr. Universe competition (amateur) would make him notable. Winning the contest at all should do that, let alone being the first Japanese man to do so. Arnold Schwarzenegger was likewise an amateur title holder of the contest, and it brought him a lot of recognition.
On a related note, if the Universe Championships violated the "WP:Sports event" rules, why not reclassify it? If Miss America is acceptable (originally - and arguably still strongly - based on appearance, rather than accomplishments) can have a page, why not this?
One of my big concerns is that removal of the Shigeru Sugita page appears to minimise the accomplishment of an Asian athlete in a time when representation and diversity are more important than ever. Surely there is a way to get this content to adhere to WP guidelines.
Indigotraveler ( talk) 10:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Dear Ad Orientem, I believe you decided to delete the page with the english translation of https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theo_Kanter. I did the translation while updating the content and adding external references and sources. Thus, I am in need of some guidance why this supporting evidence of external source is insufficient for publications. It may be so that I missed things due to unfamiliarity with the Wikipedia editing environment but this was never pointed out on the Swedish page. Please help me by pointing out exactly what is missing, because I have no problem adding sources as long I understand exactly what would be regarded as sufficient. Also, please help me to move back the content once it is acceptable as I put some effort in this and would like to avoid redoing all the work. Yours sincerely Theo Kanter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkanter ( talk • contribs) 14:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, you were kind enough to lift my recent temporary editing ban but in doing so you seemed to raise WP:consensus to a seemingly impossible standard of crystal clear consensus. The involved parties have agreed that consensus is based upon quality of an arguments and common sense WP:EL. The reasoning in the discussion at WP:External_links/Noticeboard#Beacham_Theatre is becoming increasingly subjective. I feel that crystal clear anything is going to be next to impossible. Last, apparent WP:local consensus is not the same as WP:Consensus but it would greatly impact clarity. Crystal clear consensus is an impossible standard. Could you please me offer guidance or point be to a resource to help resolve this dilemma? Thank you, Johnvr4 ( talk) 18:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Greetings! I notice someone PROD'd the Mr. Universe competition, and it managed to go the week. You did, of course, correctly remove it per due process. Unfortunately, I can't see why it managed to get the PROD treatment - this is a world renowned body building competition, where Arnold Schwarzenegger, Steve Reeves, John Grimek, (and others) came to fame. An international contest with nearly 70 years of history, and subject of a TIME retrospective. What are the chances we could get it restored so any necessary improvements could be made? Thanks in advance! Scr★pIron IV 15:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi you recently blocked the above user, I haven't seen an unblock request and the user is continuing to add unsourced and probably false information and has recently created a page that I am sure is a hoax. If he has been blocked how can he continue to edit? thanks Domdeparis ( talk) 19:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Just a heads up, a 3-month block on a dynamic IP address isn't going to stop them. Would you be willing to perform a 3 month block on this IPV6 2001:8003:251F:1C00::/64 ( block range · block log ( global) · WHOIS (partial)). Thanks. 172.58.40.31 ( talk) 22:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, the page Jean-Marie Riachi which you deleted is about a very successful Lebanese composer who composed many hit songs for famous Arab singers like Elissa (Lebanese singer). I kindly ask you to put it back. * https://twitter.com/JeanMarieRiachi
-- Salah Almhamdi ( talk) 21:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
I read your involvement with the recent dispute between the two editors. Therefore, I wonder whether a non-admin mediator is needed. I may have slightly been acquainted with GregJackP, who is currently "retired" from Wikipedia. I want to speak to
GregJackP, but I don't know whether he wants to speak to me because... well, I was horrible poor listener back then and was more interested in winning debates. I don't know whether Greg will see how much I've changed in the last few months. Over recent months, I have grown to listen to others and... accepted the consensus and reluctantly gave people what they want, even when I somewhat disagree.
JordanGero? I don't know him much; Jordan and I never interacted for the first time. However, maybe I can speak to him about his behavior. I have been mediating in some disputes before. I wonder whether I'm the right person to mediate. --
George Ho (
talk) 05:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Shall I let this slide? I already collapsed it. -- George Ho ( talk) 04:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Probably should be indeffed per WP:NOTHERE and talk page access removed. [1] -- NeilN talk to me 01:37, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ad_Orientem, That seems to have come in from the cold. I see there is still no quality verifiable references for a BLP on it. scope_creep ( talk) 02:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem, I see you doing a lot of good work around the place with your new tools. Just one thing: it may be worth adding a few words in humanspeak in a case like this, in preference to an ill-fitting template. (I just did, so no worries.) Bishonen | talk 09:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC).
Excuse me, could you protect each of the Love & Hip Hop pages, please?! Vandalizing is out of control!! Zhyboo ( talk) 16:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Ju Portuguese ( talk · contribs · uploads) Added to the SPI case. Note the nonsense userpage edits likely just done to achieve autoconfirmed status and enable uploads. Also note that this account was created well before the block...perhaps CheckUser should be requested to find the rest? — Train2104 ( t • c) 22:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
I just want to thank you for welcoming me to wikipedia. I have actually considered creating an account over here for quite a some time, but never found enough time to actually get into it. But thanks to you, I might even create the account very soon. ^^
Live Long and Prosper, said Spock and I may say it to you aswell! 88.115.74.89 ( talk) 23:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)V
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emmett Till. Legobot ( talk) 04:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Please revert and revoke talkpage access. Thanks. 172.56.38.75 ( talk) 01:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I was told that you performed the page deletion at Wei Han because it appears to pertain to earlier discussions dated 2005 and 2015. Based on my understanding, the 2005 discussion is irrelevant to the 2015's and probably referred to a different person. Back in 2015, it was more about her notability. I think after the 89th Academy Awards on Feb 26, 2017 her page should definitely be restored to the most recent creation because so many Oscars-nominated/winning movies like Jackie (2016 film), Hacksaw Ridge, Loving (2016 film) would not have been successful, had it not been the efforts of her and her company Bliss Media. With all these piracy going on in the movie business, we need people like her to keep independent film-making going. I hope you could please reverse your deletion. Thanks. Supermann ( talk) 02:44, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).
Could you also delete this edit? Harizotoh9 ( talk) 23:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Some more: Here, here, and here. Harizotoh9 ( talk) 23:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
I also made a post on BLP Notice board about this topic. I do not believe that the Daily Dot is a reliable source.
Harizotoh9 ( talk) 23:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
I think it's pretty clear cut. Dailydot is just some internet blog. Ergo not a reliable source. Harizotoh9 ( talk) 00:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I saw you declined the BLP PROD here for sources. It had no sources when placed and the only sources placed after were FB and Twitter, which from my understanding don't save you from WP:BLPPROD once it is placed. TonyBallioni ( talk) 15:05, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
I've done the newbie helping gig before and would be glad to help. Just let me know where to go. White Arabian Filly Neigh 16:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem. You have semiprotected Lordship of Biscay. I rather wish you'd undo that, because I had already blocked the disruptive IP and their range. The other IP is editing constructively AFAICS. Please see this ANI thread and this on my page. Bishonen | talk 21:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC).
Hi Ad Orientem. Texians is correct. I requested the change to "Texians" at the page for reporting errors, and it was duly changed. Please change it back to "Texians", which is the correct contemporary demonym for the time of the Republic of Texas. -- Trovatore ( talk) 20:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Will I be banned if i swear in wikepida? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.235.108.54 ( talk) 01:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
I feel that the page you deleted Matthew Kjellberg wasn't promotion at all, I created that page for my client as I'm his publicist. I think a "Twitter is not a reference" kind of reason shouldn't require a Page Deletion.
Aprilotenberg ( talk) 07:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Hate to bug you, but you were part of an AfD discussion back in 2015 regarding the subject of the above draft. I think the current draft barely passes notability standards, but cannot see the deleted draft. Would you mind having a looksee? The draft has been sitting out there for a few months, and I'd like to respond to the editor. I would have asked the AfD closer, but they haven't been active since the end of January. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 00:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Can you please revoke talk page access for this IP that you blocked? The IP looks to be cut and pasting content from articles onto the the talk page. Many Thanks. Class455 ( talk| stand clear of the doors!) 13:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem, please could you restore my draft article "The World At Mind's End" (music album) by the band Skywhale. I am trying to improve it along with the article about the band. You deleted on February 13, 2017Thank you, Cjcooper ( talk) 20:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
FYI: That user you set up mentoring for, User:Izaiah.morris, seems to be going on his merry way without seeking or receiving any assistance from designated mentor User:Oshwah. Several problematic edits and a re-creation of Splix.io which was just speedy-deleted for a fourth time. Funcrunch ( talk) 16:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Ok I won't edit yet.
I wasn't going to bug an admin to block User:RockHarper again just yet for his edits on MasterChef Junior (U.S. season 5), I figured I'd be nice and give him another warning to see if he finally changes his ways. But it is appreciated that you stepped in and took care of it. I'm guessing the details I laid out gave enough of an example as to the disruption he continues to cause to the page. So once again, thanks for stepping in and helping out, it is greatly appreciated. - SanAnMan ( talk) 19:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Any chance you could do the edit protection asap? The editor is continuing to try and make cut & paste moves. Cheers, Number 5 7 01:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Ad Orientem, I admit that in page Anti-corruption foundation there was 1 paragraph that I took from site of that organization.
All other several paragraphs were wrote without copyright infringement.
So why did you delete ALL page instead of only 1 paragraph?
Can you restore this page without that paragraph in order I rewrite it?
p.s. Do you speak Russian? Kap677-2 ( talk) 20:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
You told me to let you know if he ignored your warning. He did. I reverted his edits so far. TBMNY ( talk) 02:30, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
You refused my proposed deletion of the article sewage waste energy. You said "names can be changed". What do you mean by that? Did you review the discussion we've had about the article here? The conclusion was clear. Also, the person who started the article never responded to any attempts to discuss this; instead, he/she added a link to this new article in a number of other pages which I found disruptive. If you prefer not to have it deleted then the other option is to place a redirect to sewage sludge treatment. EMsmile ( talk) 19:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Would you have a moment to look at the edits of Bloomdoom2? I reported this at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xboxmanwar three weeks ago. If this is the same editor, they were a huge time-sink and a very destructive editor. If I go to ANI it will be an hour preparing diffs, but if it's the sock it's very simple. Thanks. Magnolia677 ( talk) 02:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
I saw this too late, and think deleting this article was entirely lame. -- Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 16:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
As you were the blocking admin for IP User talk:117.103.88.85 the IP has returned on User talk:117.103.88.77 making the same edits and Vandalizing the same articles. Geolocate puts them both at Oceania Country Marshall Islands. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 01:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
As I suspected they have returned on another IP. Geolocates to the Marshall Islands just like the others. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 05:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Re. this, see WP:ATTREQ, and things like this, where the violations were removed but the page was subsequently still deleted under the criteria. Loads more examples in my log, but of course- ironically- I can't see them any more :) Just FYI. Take care! — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 18:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kevin O'Leary. Legobot ( talk) 04:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Evil bullet ( talk) 08:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC) Deletion of /info/en/?search=Upacking_List
Please, could you provide an information about what I can change in my page to make it appear on Wikipedia? I've added usefull links and deleted every marketing issue from previous version. What can I do more? Thank you & have a good day) Evil bullet ( talk) 08:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Evil bullet
That user you've attempted to mentor, User:Izaiah.morris, appears to be ignoring your advice on his talk page, and has gone ahead and recreated that Clay DeBord article both in draft and mainspace. Funcrunch ( talk) 15:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Oh my goodness I'm sorry for the misunderstanding i will ask Ad Orientum before i make that article. But i also need some help with it and wouldn't mind if you cold find some help on that article. I'm sure you can tell i'm not messing around and vandilising. I just want to get this article done before someone else makes it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Izaiah.morris ( talk • contribs) 15:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your earlier help with the previous sockpuppet. I wanted to let you know that I started a new investigation into a new editor, User:EthanSylar, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JackHood, if you wanted to take a look and provide any other evidence. Aspects ( talk) 14:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
I saw the WCPW World Championship article and I think that is notable and as very sources can you remove the criteria for speedy deletion (CSD G5)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProWrestlingLover123 ( talk • contribs) 14:48, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
A bot removed the protection template from Carlo M. Croce, which you had protected. It needed protection, because it was under constant revision and deletion by SPAs with a declared or undeclared relationship with the subject. I'm not sure what the status is now, but you might want to look at it and see if the bot screwed it up. -- Nbauman ( talk) 21:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't look like your final warning had much of an impact. TimothyJosephWood 20:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, Ad Orientem, for posting a warning about having an edit war. I have created and contributed to the Ali Shilatifard page for about three years, simply adding scientific accomplishments. The page has recently come under a barrage of edits including removing awards, making comments about "not necessarily major" discoveries (which have now been completely removed), and insisting on a COI and placing a COI template box over and over again, even though the page is very neutral and sourced. This type of unsubstantiated edits should not be allowed. I have attempted to use the appropriate channels of communication, including "cleaning up" the page, writing polite comments on Talk pages (which are deleted rather than responded to by Natureium and now a number IP address). If you could kindly please help stop these edits and block the placement of the COI template box on the Ali Shilatifard article, it would be greatly appreciated. This page is helpful in bringing attention to the important work that Dr. Shilatifard and his colleagues are doing on childhood leukemia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magnolia007 ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
On 24 March 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Denis Voronenkov, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 02:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. You deleted Great Depression (Defiance, Ohio album), The Fear, the Fear, the Fear and Midwestern Minutes because Defiance, Ohio (band) was deleted in error. I'm wondering if you could reverse this. -- Evanw ( talk) 15:11, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry it was The Great Depression (Defiance, Ohio album) the albums weren't deleted for lack of notability they were deleted because the page for Defiance, Ohio (band) was deleted for lack of sources. I had the page restored and re wrote it with sources. Defiance, Ohio is one of the most prominent bands in the wave of DIY punk in the mid-late 00s. They had multiple tours of the USA, Canada, Iceland, and Europe. Their albums were reviewed on notable music websites see: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] These albums have had significant impact on punk and are worthy to have an article dedicated to them.
On the recreation page for these articles it says to message the user who deleted them with concerns, let me know if you would rather me direct these concerns to WP:DELREV.
-- Evanw ( talk) 23:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Template:Sony Franchises was deleted by you as "Unused, redundant template", but it has 31 transclusions. Please restore it and send it to WP:TFD if you want to have it deleted. 98.230.196.215 ( talk) 22:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
User:RockHarper went right back to vandalizing the page at MasterChef Junior (U.S. season 5), this time adding junk details to the table. Seems he didn't get your message about behaving better. - SanAnMan ( talk) 22:40, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your action. We'll see if it helps. --- The Old Jacobite The '45 16:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Would you look over this ANI thread and close it? here The issue of the disruptive closing of the RfC has been sorted and appears past-ready for a close. Thanks. SW3 5DL ( talk) 17:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Could I get you to reinstate your block of Das osmnezz? Shortly after you granted their unblock request we this. Calling Ohayon's performance "auspicious" may not be the most egregious NPOV-violation, but shows pretty clearly that they still don't get it. Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 13:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
It's been quiet for awhile but the IP range block you placed on the IP vandal in Oceania is back Geolocate matches as does the vandalizing edits from before. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 11:38, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
You are not going to flipping believe this they're back. Same edits, same geo, same everything, ugh. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 03:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2016. Legobot ( talk) 04:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I guess you deleted S. N. Sadasivan on the grounds that it was a direct copy of the biographical article present elsewhere in the internet. It was tagged with speedy deletion and I was notified of it. But I had thoroughly rewritten the article, expanded and augmented it with references. I had contested the deletion request but couldnt see any replies to it. I would like to know if you could throw some light on the issue. thanks in advance. -- Challiyan ( talk) 17:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi, I'm probably going to do an RFC soon, asking whether people support your proposed lead paragraph, and not mentioning the other options, except maybe the present version. Good job on your version, BTW. Anyway, I am coming here merely to ask whether you have thought of any improvements since proposing it. If so, then I would do the RFC on the improved version. One qualm I have is the word "current", per WP:Current, but I can support the word "current" if you don't have any problem with it. Seems to me the word "incumbent" connotes more permanence than the word "current", but it's not a big deal. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 21:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
e/c@ Anythingyouwant: Ad Orientem's proposed sentence is gaining consensus. Your proposal for another RfC with sentences you select seeks to overturn that. Once again, you are rushing in to over turn a gathering consensus just as you did earlier with the RfC you have running now. That RfC solves nothing. All it did was stop the consensus. And here you are straight out saying you're going to do it again. No, I oppose this continuing disruption. SW3 5DL ( talk) 22:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).
Since apparently only you can change the lead sentence of Donald Trump away from the current version which no longer has anyone arguing for it, could you please do so as soon as possible? I don't mind if it's your version or this one [11] which is a less radical change. Siuenti ( talk) 22:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
I did not change his edit. He changed mine here. I had already closed it. He could have added the bits about the #17 consensus without wiping out my close. So please, I was restoring my edit as he's not my Daddy. He's another editor who should respect my close. Please go and undo your edit. Thanks. SW3 5DL ( talk) 21:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Isn't this [12] edit warring too? I've made 944 edits to that article and the images of the paintings need to be seen; this is an article about visual art - and its a long standing issue that visual art needs to be seen. This editor wolfowitz misinterprets the imagery rules constantly and consistently; removing images from this encyclopedia to suit his whim, with extremely dubious rationales... Modernist ( talk) 23:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | ||
Thank you for cutting a stubborn knot with a great edit. Well done. Please stick around over there. SW3 5DL ( talk) 03:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you. - Ad Orientem ( talk) 12:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Ad Orientem. I saw the comments regarding Abraham Bolden you made in FTN a few months back. You may recall that Chicago plot to assassinate President John F. Kennedy once existed separate from Abraham Bolden. The story that there was a Chicago plot originates from Bolden, so I agree with whomever made the decision to redirect the former to the later. I think having the redirect work the other way gives undue credence to Bolden's fabricated story. (See also Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard/Archive_42#Chicago_plot_to_assassinate_President_John_F._Kennedy.) I also think this is an article that needs to be watched very closely, especially since various mainstream news sources who are ignorant of the full history frequently reiterate Bolden's claims as fact. For example, here is one by Ebony that has popped up since I began my Wikibreak: [13]. Anyway, hope you are well! - Location ( talk) 04:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
To whom it may concern:
Please do not get offended but I am currently pursuing my Master and Doctoral Degrees in Theology.
Accordingly, the Catholic and Christian Orthodox faith were united as one until the great schism.
My recent edit was only meet to draw distinction between the Catholic and Christian Orthodox churches.
I pray that one day these two Christian Churches can set aside their differences and be reunited once again.
In the true spirit of humanity we need dialogue first before summarily dismissing ones opinion.
Take the utmost care, Giorgos Trifon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giorgos Trifon ( talk • contribs) 10:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
The assertion about "conspiracy theories" in the Bill Murphy entry is disparaging and unsourced. It should be removed. Besides, there's no "theory" when government officials meet in secret to develop and implement courses of action. In many respects government is OFTEN "conspiracy." — Preceding unsigned comment added by CXPowell ( talk • contribs) 22:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
This user that you blocked for 24 hours is an obvious sock of LTA User:Catcreekcitycouncil. For the record, even if this isn't this sockmaster, they've created another account here. Thank you. 212.199.114.161 ( talk) 22:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Wack-a-mole time. See [14] by User:Sunuprugs Meters ( talk) 23:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Well, I'm sorry I missed the fun - would be curious to know what was at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jeh . Jeh ( talk) 03:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Fleming (American politician). Legobot ( talk) 04:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Dear Ad Orientem:
I have just today noticed that you deleted the article about the Canadian company Taraspan. The reason given by the PRODing editor, SwisterTwister was that the article had been created in contravention of the paid editing policy, that the article was promotional, and that the references were mainly warmed-over press releases. It's true that the original draft article was very promotional, and was created by an intern working at the company. It had been previously deleted twice for this reason. However, it was created a year before the paid editing policy was created, and it was properly posted in WP:AFC, where COI material is allowed until reviewed and de-fluffed. Accordingly, I rewrote the text to include just facts, and added multiple references to articles in mainstream Canadian newspapers. While some of the ones I added do include quotes from the company's founders, this is because they were interviewed by journalists, and none of the interviewee's words were used to support the text, only those of the journalists. I moved the draft to mainspace when I felt that it was adequately supported.
I didn't see the PROD at the time. If I had, I would have removed it and added more references, such as this one from the national newspaper The Globe and Mail and this one from the National Post.
Unless you object, I plan to reinstate the article and add the two extra references. If SwisterTwister still thinks that the article can't be made acceptable through editing, he can always take it to WP:AFD.— Anne Delong ( talk) 15:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I was wondering why you deleted the page on James Rajasekar— your deletion logs cut out part of your explanation with ellipses. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasterEditor500 ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
The "Hassane" page you deleted was linking to me "Hazzane" as there was no such user as "Hassane" and couldn't create/register my account with the user "Hassane". I'm Hassane Let's Talk! 23:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
With regard to this discussion [15]: This is by no means the first time the issue has come up, and it's pretty clearly a settled one by now. See, for example, Talk:List of 20th-century women artists#Deleting valid and important images, Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_February_24#Frank_Auerbach, Talk:Kay Sage#Images and Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_January_31#File:Untitled_painting_by_Larry_Poons.2C_ca.1964.jpg. Modernist doesn't accept fundamental elements of NFC use policy (and says as much here Talk:Abstract_expressionism/Archive#Images_2), but has had no success in changing it (and it is basically WMF policy, not merely local policy). Basic NFC enforcement is exempt from edit warring limits, for good reason; and when matters are as clearly settled as this one there's no need for repeating the same discussions ad nauseam -- especially when Modernist trots out bad faith claims of vandalism and all-caps edit summaries like "YOU ARE TOTALLY WRONG" rather than arguments rooted in policy or guideline. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. ( talk) 11:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
IMO, continuing to omit 2017 Nangarhar airstrike from ITN is not reasonable when it remains a prominent topic on mainstream news outlets and the death toll, according to Afghani officials, has risen to more than 90. Suggest reopen. Sca ( talk) 14:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I already put in a request for talk page protection but I figured it might be wise to add protection to my user page as well, at least temporarily. I would also appreciate a longer block on the talk page . Thanks ahead of time ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 15:17, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. The article Kulbhushan Yadav was moved to its current title Kulbhushan Jadhav. Since you posted his news on ITN, would you be able to correct his spelling there? Thanks in advance. Mar4d ( talk) 01:14, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem! I was reviewing this user's contributions for repeated COPYVIO edits, but I can't find which edits (other than maybe the first one) that introduced them. Am I missing something? Can you list these edits so I can take a look? ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 23:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Hey Ad, I know you were tracking the constant disruptive editing of RockHarper ( talk · contribs), well he is doing the same type of disruptive edits as before, mostly again on MasterChef Junior (U.S. season 5). I tried giving him one last final warning with no luck. What's your call on this? - SanAnMan ( talk) 01:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
They've gone and made another copyright violation, so they still don't get it. Regards. Amaury ( talk | contribs) 23:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
With the 1RR on DT, does that mean that if you revise content, and that gets reverted, and you then come back and revise the same content again less than 24 hours later, is that a 1RR violation? SW3 5DL ( talk) 19:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
{e/c] I'm not all that familiar with the sanctioning on ArbCom pages. but these edits seem to me to be violating 1RR imposed on DT, and there are more like them.
SW3 5DL ( talk) 19:37, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Ad Orientem: Will you be commenting on the article talk page? SW3 5DL ( talk) 19:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
I didn't know you wanted a copy here. I've seen admins move discussions from their page to article/user talk pages without leaving a copy. Also, can you please comment on the article talk page now? Thanks. SW3 5DL ( talk) 22:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Before I screw up another article move, a few editors moved this article to the Venezuelan economic crisis of 2013–17 article without discussion. They did the "2-title move", where you cannot revert the moves and need an administrator to make edits. I originally made the article since there is an Economic policy of the Hugo Chávez government article. The move was unnecessary since there is already a Crisis in Bolivarian Venezuela article. Your help would be greatly appreciated!-- ZiaLater ( talk) 00:06, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Please consider spending some time as a page moderator on DT. You are very good at sorting things. I think the other editors would appreciate it as much as I would. Thanks. SW3 5DL ( talk) 01:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
I did reply to your comment on Anything's talk but he reverted it so here it is: I understand completely, and I see that you are involved. Your warning to him is the first refreshing thing I've seen in a bit. And yes, I too must dial that back, but I am fully prepared to defend it. SW3 5DL ( talk) 14:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
FYI, probable WP:EVASION: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jlind0. Murph9000 ( talk) 15:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
FYI: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft_talk%3AEladio_del_Valle&type=revision&diff=777003803&oldid=777001943. - Location ( talk) 19:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
They must've seen you're not interested in fighting it and have tried to get someone else involved here: on Jim1138's page
Love.Live.Life
Hey Jim, I see you've reverted the user Masheenya on Cover Drive. Can you also revert them on Love.Live.Life? I've gone up to my three-revert limit there, but they have added unsourced content there as well and used a dead link to attempt to cover it up. Ss 112 20:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Can you try and sort something out please? Masheenya ( talk) 20:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Would like to understand why Rubique company page was deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheetal mayekar ( talk • contribs) 05:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Would be grateful if you could supply me with a copy of the content of the Nubyen page you recently deleted so I can make amendments towards Wikipedia compliance. Much thanks. Finn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drfinn ( talk • contribs) 08:03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Ad
I'm coming here to tell you on why you deleted that why?
Because she is not notable because she doesn't have a "reliable source" or because I'm not good making articles and they are all bad? or just because I'm not welcome here in Wikipedia, when I just want help and let the readers know about British Wrestling, tell me why? Why?
Why could you not ask at least for someone to improve it?
Thanks for your time
TheBuilder456 ( talk) 14:33, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
P.s: I prefer a hard and rough truth than a delusional lie, also if it is to undelete how can I do that or what should I do? Because listen I just want to know the basic of Wikipedia and what I have to do to retain my articles and where I can find reliable sources about professional wrestling.
(Comment moved from the top of the talk page)
Why di dyou dlete my wikiepdia entry? He told me peronally via instagram his ethnioc background!!! that is the source -(unsigned comment from Nicholas20177)
Excuse me but as i mentioned before, HE TOLD ME PERSONALLY. You cna't get more reliable than that! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholas20177 ( talk • contribs) 15:56, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Ad orientem, I don't think he's listening. So far he's added in ancestral backgrounds for
Linda McMahon, Chumlee, Paul Teutul Sr and Logan Sama only one of them had a source, (Paul Teutul Sr ) but it was a user-supplied resource and therefore fails WP:RS.
As you can see I've spoken to him about this, with a non-template message and his reply was fairly dismissive, and you've spoken to him and his response was to edit Paul Sr's article. He may need a more serious attention getter. Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ 16:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, it came to my attention that you have recently tagged the Iran–Israel proxy conflict as "ARBPIA" article, which is an apparent mistake and contrary to the WP:GS/SCW general sanctions, which were installed in order to cover Syrian Civil War-related articles and topics (see 2013 motion for more details). I assume your action was good faith and possibly motivated by erroneous talk page ARBPIA tagging on 9 February 2017 by user:Shrike ( notified), who must have not been aware that WP:GS/SCW general sanctions supersede ARBPIA in relevance to Syrian Civil War since the 2013 motion. The Iran–Israel proxy conflict has been tagged on talk page as WP:GS/SCW since February 2014 and should include Template:Editnotice SCW 1RR (not ARBPIA). Logically, you can also notice that Iran is not an Arab country, and hence Israeli-Iranian tensions are not part of the Arab-Israeli conflict, though are indeed relevant to the Syrian Civil War. GreyShark ( dibra) 18:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, i found more Syrian Civil War-related articles which were marked ARBPIA instead of SCW&ISIL sanctions. Could you change the 1RR notice as well at Hezbollah, January 2015 Shebaa farms incident, Imad Mughniyah? GreyShark ( dibra) 08:09, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
What's wrong with ethnic celebs? I used a source for Paul Sr! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholas20177 ( talk • contribs) 16:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
I have a book source for Rick Harrison. It's called: 'License to Pawn: Deals, Steals, and My Life at the Gold & Silver'. It says he is of Irish descent in the book so can i use the book as a reference? Do i just type in the name of the book when adding a reference i.e [1]?
As to the book, I checked it, it appears reliable, my only concern is it's about Rick Harrison, the son and not the older Rick Harrison, so the information may not be accurate for Rick Harrison Sr. Other than that, the book appears to be reliable. Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ 14:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
50.93.144.6 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS)
Hey,
It looks like you and User:Materialscientist conflicted different block durations for this IP. Just passing this along. Thanks. 59.166.130.102 ( talk) 02:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem, could you help out at this BLP? I've requested a user block and page protection--persistent addition of poorly sourced personal gossip. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 01:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm working through some of the early modern papal conclaves ( Papal conclave, 1724 was the first I started on, and now just expanded Papal conclave, May 1605 for DYK). I've noticed in some of the others that the sourcing is in my mind pretty bad. Namely, they rely on what I can tell are self-published sources this source typically for lists of electors and ones from this series for describing factions. The latter one appears to be by a classics professor, but have not gone through peer review. This also makes a lot of appearances in some of the articles. Doesn't look self-published, but I'm also not quite sure if the original publication would be RS.
The main reason I am asking is that there are several GAs from about 10 years ago that seem to be built on this sourcing (ex. Papal conclave, 1769). I'd personally feel very uncomfortable expanding any of the early modern stubs with the information, and have been removing the lists and expanding based on current scholarship. Just wanted to pick someone elses brain on for thoughts on the sourcing for the larger articles in the series. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Dear Ad Orientem,
As previously you have contributed to Wikipedia in regards to financial articles, would you, please, consider writing an article on Creamfinance? It is a global financial services company that provides personal finance products in emerging markets. The company was ranked as the second fastest-growing company in Europe in 2016. Creamfinance is employing over 220 people and operating in 7 countries both within and outside of Europe – Latvia, Poland, Czech Republic, Georgia, Denmark and Mexico with an IT office in Austria.
I believe it corresponds to the Wikipedia notability rules as it has been talked about in legitimate third party sources: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
If you wish I have put together a first draft for the page and can send it you.
According to Wikipedia guidelines I want to underline that I am a Project Manager at Golin Riga and I have been approached by Creamfinance to help with their representation on Wikipedia. Aozolins-golin-riga ( talk) 14:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
References
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/MOS:GENDERID for genderqueer people. Legobot ( talk) 04:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
The Saturday Night Live troll that you blocked a few weeks ago struck again. Thanks for your help. Sundayclose ( talk) 19:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
After he was reported and then blocked at Commons, he sent me a self-reverted FU message at English Wikipedia: [16]. He's done this before back in December 2016. -- George Ho ( talk) 18:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).
Hi, a few minutes ago, I pinged you in four separate sections on Talk:John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories. I am posting this message here so that you would not get the impression that wikipedia mistakenly pinged you multiple times. Thanks. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ad Orientem. I saw you blocked the user Whippyice will for adding unsourced content after they were reported at ANV. I have reported the user Tjdrum2000 twice now at ANV for adding unsourced content and making disruptive edits in much the same vein as Whippyice will. They have been warned by various users for adding unsourced content across music and film articles and they are still doing it and refusing to explain these unsourced additions, provide any edit summaries, or change their behaviour. They have previously been blocked for disruptive editing. I don't think this fits something to be reported at ANI as that is a last resort and there's no back-and-forth edit warring, just the same disruption. Can you please take a look at this user and block if necessary? I don't think what else will get them to stop. Thank you. Ss 112 03:14, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
This editor, User:RoyGoldsmith, made an interesting, and very accurate assessment on trying to get things done on the DT article. here. I think it speaks to precisely why we need a moderator there. SW3 5DL ( talk) 18:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I intend to run Mireille Issa through Afd to see what happens, it might squeak through or not. Please undelete it and maybe encourage whoever prodded it to Afd it instead of me. Siuenti ( 씨유엔티) 22:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, AO, while I agree that a level 4 is appropriate when there is a hint of substantive editing, or when an IP editor is clearly not a SPA whose purpose is to vandalize. That isn't the case with this vandal. Look at the IP's edits since 2013 - not even one edit has been anything but vandalism. They've had ample warnings, but the vandalism continues. See these diffs and what was edited. It's garbage, and it's harmful to WP. Please block. Atsme 📞 📧 20:50, 10 May 2017 (UTC)