I | II | III | HB | AAB | TFA | Hale |
Legobot | Legobot II | Legobot III | Hockeybot | ArticleAlertbot | TFA Protector | HaleBot |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
@ Legoktm: Your bot's been reverting itself twice daily since January 2023, and before that daily since December 2021, on Talk:Crusades/Archive index ( history). Similarly, it's been reverting itself daily since November 2021 and more sporadically before that since March 2017 on User talk:Safety Cap/Archives/Destination ( history). — Cryptic 17:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
I edited
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines inserting {{bots|deny=Legobot}}
because you keep messing up <small>...</small>
tags. Go ahead and remove the bots template, but please stop messing up the <small>...</small>
tags. (Also attn:
WOSlinker) —
Anomalocaris (
talk) 07:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Legobot will copy the markup of your statement (from the end of the {{
rfc}}
tag through the first timestamp) to the list of active RfCs, if it is sufficiently brief; a long statement will fail to be copied. For technical reasons, statements may not contain ... complex formatting, although these may be added after the initial statement (i.e., after the first timestamp).
; earlier on, note [1] says The "statement" is the part that is located between the {{
rfc}}
tag (exclusive) and the first valid timestamp (inclusive), and which is copied by bot to various pages.
{{
rfc}}
tag with notes that are not part of the RfC statement itself, expecially if a template like {{
block indent}}
and a HTML tag like <small>
are both still open when the next timestamp occurs. Such notes must always be after the timestamp that closes the statement. The problem was introduced by
Novo Tape (
talk ·
contribs) with
this edit, and the fix is
very simple. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 10:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
{{
rfc}}
. Essentially, Legobot runs once an hour and builds fresh copies of each and every RfC listing page, which it saves, regardless of whatever happens to be on the page at the time. It therefore ignores {{
nobots}}
and any other content that it didn't add itself on its previous run. Whilst this may seem to be a violation of
WP:OWN, it's quite normal for bot-built reports, of which there are many. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 23:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC)The bot won't let me add categories to the category-based subpages of Wikipedia:Requests for comment, such as Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Unsorted, which are currently uncategorized. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Wom Juanese1990 ( talk) 15:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
Apologies if this has already been answered. If I add a topic area from {{rfc}} Legobot will add that RfC to the respective topic page. If I remove a topic area Legobot apparently won't remove it from that topic page. Could Legobot do this in the future? Schierbecker ( talk) 23:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Legoktm, what happened
here and
here? These three rfcids do not occur anywhere in
Template:Rfc, nor indeed anywhere other than the two pages in those diffs. I've seen something similar before, at least five years ago, due to somebody putting an {{
RfC}}
tag inside commented text. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 18:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
MariaDB s51043__legobot> select * from rfc where rfc_id="8C10D2D";
+---------+--------------+---------------+-------------+---------------+
| rfc_id | rfc_page | rfc_contacted | rfc_expired | rfc_timestamp |
+---------+--------------+---------------+-------------+---------------+
| 8C10D2D | Template:Rfc | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+---------+--------------+---------------+-------------+---------------+
1 row in set (0.010 sec)
I | II | III | HB | AAB | TFA | Hale |
Legobot | Legobot II | Legobot III | Hockeybot | ArticleAlertbot | TFA Protector | HaleBot |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
@ Legoktm: Your bot's been reverting itself twice daily since January 2023, and before that daily since December 2021, on Talk:Crusades/Archive index ( history). Similarly, it's been reverting itself daily since November 2021 and more sporadically before that since March 2017 on User talk:Safety Cap/Archives/Destination ( history). — Cryptic 17:57, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
I edited
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines inserting {{bots|deny=Legobot}}
because you keep messing up <small>...</small>
tags. Go ahead and remove the bots template, but please stop messing up the <small>...</small>
tags. (Also attn:
WOSlinker) —
Anomalocaris (
talk) 07:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Legobot will copy the markup of your statement (from the end of the {{
rfc}}
tag through the first timestamp) to the list of active RfCs, if it is sufficiently brief; a long statement will fail to be copied. For technical reasons, statements may not contain ... complex formatting, although these may be added after the initial statement (i.e., after the first timestamp).
; earlier on, note [1] says The "statement" is the part that is located between the {{
rfc}}
tag (exclusive) and the first valid timestamp (inclusive), and which is copied by bot to various pages.
{{
rfc}}
tag with notes that are not part of the RfC statement itself, expecially if a template like {{
block indent}}
and a HTML tag like <small>
are both still open when the next timestamp occurs. Such notes must always be after the timestamp that closes the statement. The problem was introduced by
Novo Tape (
talk ·
contribs) with
this edit, and the fix is
very simple. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 10:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
{{
rfc}}
. Essentially, Legobot runs once an hour and builds fresh copies of each and every RfC listing page, which it saves, regardless of whatever happens to be on the page at the time. It therefore ignores {{
nobots}}
and any other content that it didn't add itself on its previous run. Whilst this may seem to be a violation of
WP:OWN, it's quite normal for bot-built reports, of which there are many. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 23:04, 10 December 2023 (UTC)The bot won't let me add categories to the category-based subpages of Wikipedia:Requests for comment, such as Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Unsorted, which are currently uncategorized. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 20:22, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Wom Juanese1990 ( talk) 15:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC) |
Apologies if this has already been answered. If I add a topic area from {{rfc}} Legobot will add that RfC to the respective topic page. If I remove a topic area Legobot apparently won't remove it from that topic page. Could Legobot do this in the future? Schierbecker ( talk) 23:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Legoktm, what happened
here and
here? These three rfcids do not occur anywhere in
Template:Rfc, nor indeed anywhere other than the two pages in those diffs. I've seen something similar before, at least five years ago, due to somebody putting an {{
RfC}}
tag inside commented text. --
Redrose64 🌹 (
talk) 18:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
MariaDB s51043__legobot> select * from rfc where rfc_id="8C10D2D";
+---------+--------------+---------------+-------------+---------------+
| rfc_id | rfc_page | rfc_contacted | rfc_expired | rfc_timestamp |
+---------+--------------+---------------+-------------+---------------+
| 8C10D2D | Template:Rfc | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+---------+--------------+---------------+-------------+---------------+
1 row in set (0.010 sec)