![]() |
Hello, Scope creep!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk)
14:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
|
Hi, I'm North8000. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Çiçek Islands, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 22:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Allenjambalaya ( talk) 13:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Hi, this is regarding the copyright issue with Dvaitadvaita that you have raised. Actually I only created separate pages from existing Wikipedia page. So was there a copyright violation in the previous Wikipedia page Kumāra Sampradaya from which I copied the text? Would be glad to discuss this in the Kumāra Sampradaya talk page. Maybe we need to find out who authored the previous article. Thank you for raising the issue. ( User talk:Madhav kiran sodum) —Preceding undated comment added 15:24, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Greetings. No discussion page was created for this AfD. Page Curation seems to be especially buggy lately in this regard--I'd recommend sticking to Twinkle for AfD nominations. Thanks. -- Finngall talk 17:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Scope creep
Thank you for creating Zawiya of Sidi Abd el-Aziz.
User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Google book reference exist.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
scope_creep Talk 00:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
In case you missed it on RDH: see Red Orchestra (espionage). 2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588 ( talk) 20:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
I saw your new RD thread, which looks good. If it were me I'd just remove the translations to "red chapel" and leave it at red orchestra. But, I'll defer to Jmar67. 2601:648:8202:96B0:A598:FF3D:8240:4E2B ( talk) 01:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy ( talk) 23:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Incidents#FloridaArmy_and_AfC_woes.
Sulfurboy (
talk)
04:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ymblanter ( talk) 05:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Garth Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aberfeldy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
Dear scope_creep Talk, I'm writing you because you nominated speedy deletion of an article created by me (Hello Wood). I ask you to cancel your speedy deletion. I see you flagged it as "promotional" but I rather see it as an encyclopedic content about an internationally acclaimed and awarded design studio. Both I and Hello Wood have Hungarian roots, but I tried to write the article without any bias. If any of my words, sentences seem promotional please advise me how to correct them or feel free to correct them yourself. I don't see why this article has to be removed.
Thanks, Littletkforyou
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
12:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Scope creep as per information at WP:AFC/RBS, I would like to draw your attention to Draft:Pieter De Bruyne which you might be interested to review. Thank you. ~ Amkgp ✉ 06:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Scope creep, you left a comment about inline citations in de article Draft:Pieter De Bruyne i added some. Can you check it out pls. thx 2A02:1812:1C20:2300:892E:B2A2:24CD:3E72 ( talk) 17:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Scope creep, thank you for your help. I ve added 10 references.
Hi, I moved User Scope creep/Sandbox B21 from mainspace to your userspace. Schazjmd (talk) 14:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Scope creep. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pruthvi Ambaar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: there's considerably more sources than there were when it was nominated last time. This needs to go back to AfD. Thank you. Ged UK 07:11, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Orchestra (espionage), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint-Gilles ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Since you have participated in creating articles on Scottish island settlements and dealing with drafts I have started drafts at Draft:Kinloch, Rùm, Draft:Lagg, Jura, Draft:Cullipool and Draft:Tarbert, Jura. I'm not sure if these meet the inclusion criteria but I'm wandering if you have any more info for them, thanks. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 21:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
First of all, well done for finding that discussion. I recall the sense of frustration well! As I remember it the thrust of the argument was "there are lots of places that are very small now but at least some of them have an interesting history that could be fleshed out" vs "why clutter the place up with articles that say next to nothing and have little hope of every doing so, they are little more than an expression of the obvious, why not just have a list?". I doubt that much has changed since then save that I think it is clear that over the years small new articles continue to be created at a rate that is faster than our collective ability or inclination to turn those that have some prospect of improvement into something of substance. From my perspective there is little point in grumbling about this and I don't see that it causes any harm provided everything is accurate, not subject to vandalism (a lot of them must be unwatched) and accurately categorised. (As an aside its amazing the number of red links for the cats that were discussed back then.) I don't know if that's helpful. The best way to get info about substantially cleared villages may be either from local history books or maybe the
Statistical Accounts of Scotland, Canmore etc. I have very little such material to hand and the
Gazetteer for Scotland does not seem to have added much new for a wee while. In short, I tend not to write much about settlements as such & I am more mellow than a decade ago and don't see a genuine problem with very small places if people are inspired to write about them. If it was me, writing about say
Cullipool, at minimum I'd want to add at least one para that might make people think e.g. culled from this rather poignant press piece:
"Luing recalls tragedy that claimed sailors". {{
cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help) from
The Oban Times but that's just me.
Ben
Mac
Dui
09:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC) PS
I am in shock - that's what you get for taking some time off I suppose. If I can be bothered I might start a convo somewhere that attempts to get some kind of clear policy for Scottish island names.
Hi again,
Since I see you are an art lover, would you accept reviewing this article on
Pieter Pourbus I have enriched and worked on a lot?
There are still mainly 2 types of issues:
1/ sources in some paragraphs: I am working on these points ( I have all literature available in my library).
2/ pure editing in a good (but not too basic) English (if you have time and patience, please read [
the dialogue with another editor], who admitted he has no knowledge in art history, and accepted I revert some of his own edits)
I have worked on purpose on the images, so that their size give at first sight an impression of the real size of the actual painting; and also so that the description sticks to standards art historians currently use (it is also more encyclopaedic). And will continue to check some who lack this kind of edit yet.
Will be glad to have your news, and help.
Have a good day!
--
Emigré55 (
talk)
10:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Lapablo ( talk) 16:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)I'm loving the amount of Loch articles you've created, some naming updates to provide consistency across bodies of water is under way with guidelines outlined at WikiProject Lakes name (region) format is suggested for disambiguation, feel free to add yourself as a member and help shape the direction since you seem to have an overlap in interest. Help us track these by adding {{WikiProject Lakes}} to the talk page. There are a number of lochs on the list of lochs of Scotland needing renaming for consistency which helps to disambiguate from any settlement. I understand terms matter which is why I added lochs explicitly as scope for the project as loch vs lake was talked about in the page history as being important. Also the body of water location field doesn't seem the right place for the templates of "NO175427" according the doc of the infobox this should be city or other region. It would be preferable that the British Grid be a separate parameter rather than conflated in the location field which has no context for those who do not live within the system. What do you say we join forces and move forward with consistency of bodies of water on Wikipedia together? Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? ( talk) 09:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ Emigré55: I managed to look at the above article There are several section that have been expanded and not be cited at all. It needs additional references in those section. If you need a hand, give me a shout. The article subject is eminently notable. Well done for updating it. The next task is to reference it. scope_creep Talk 16:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Scope creep,
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loch Benachally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loch Benachally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Stop biting the newbie ( talk) 03:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
I brought sources that the group is 5th place in the Israeli fashion sector, I brought a source worth over $ 100 million, I brought a source that it has 170 branches in Israel I brought a source that the most successful models in Israel - Moran Atias and Bar Refaeli have been the representative of the company for years.
What other sources do you need? Bar ( talk) 04:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
f sources, I don't sufficient to show it is notable. With 170 stores it should be notable but I cant see a lot. scope_creep Talk 08:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Zanimum ( talk) 19:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Many thanks for reviewing The Stonemason (book); much appreciated. Jonathan A Jones ( talk) 20:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
This is part of a serial mass deletion campaign and nothing new based on the message I left on the user's talk page. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 04:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey! Thank you so much for your work reviewing so many articles :) I was wondering if you might be able to join in the deletion discussion of this page /info/en/?search=Ayana_Jordan. Based on notability criteria, she appears to meet them but I am getting pushback and would like more eyes on this deletion discussion. If you have time, I would really appreciate it. Microglia145 ( talk) 20:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia is supposed to be a learning environment, not a propaganda page. Ms Cullors is an admited Marxist in her own words and it is relevant to inform readers of her page. Signed by user:Truthtrain by scope_creep Talk 22:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary ( talk) 08:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Hi thanks for the message. Googlescholar was indeed checked, but you realise beyond citations there's very little qualifying this academic as a notable Prof- meriting a Wikipedia article. I have no idea what H-score is, but my impression is if we use citation metrics as Wikipedia level notability, I suspect we'd be creating articles for all Ivy league professors. That plus the article seemed to be a self-promoting article by himself or his staff. Dudewheresmywallet ( talk) 11:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello dear Scope_creep. Can you help remove the "Delete Tag"? toswo Mrloopitus ( talk) 19:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen you suggest the page I've written Solid-state electrolyte doesn't follow the tone or style of Wikipedia. Could you please give me some practical examples on what is wrong and how to improve the page? Thanks -- Sikko94 ( talk) 09:22, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
. I like to keep communication on Wikipedia, but this involves information from outside of Wikipedia.-- Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉]) 10:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I don't have the time right now to plow through the article to find the parts that made me stumble and re-read. But as a starter, there is "h the Gestapo, was i" - the subject is separated from the predicate by a comma. That's not an example of being turgid, but it does make for difficult reading. I'll try to find time later to get more examples. Kdammers ( talk) 16:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Ingratis. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Monastery of Vallbona de les Monjas, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Ingratis ( talk) 22:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Scope Creep |
Thank-you for the suggestion, however if i were to
expand the Macedonian Hussar Regiment article Jingiby would delete the information. You could possibly help me. Jingiby thinks i am a sockpuppet of a previous user. However i have only had two accounts, this is my second wikipedia account. Regards Kajmakcalan ( talk) 14:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC) |
Movidatabase (
talk)
21:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi I have provided links and a lot of information about a famous Italian director. I ask for it to be published
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hitro talk 10:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Hi Scope creep! I saw you added a tag for cleanup on Destiny Rogers. I am just a bit confused on the tag, since it says there are references in pink. What does that mean exactly? Thanks! -- Divine618 ( talk) 15:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I was writing and completing an article called Ava Bahram that has been deleted by you. Please revive the article on my home page. I want to edit and complete the article. Regards Gimbouri ( talk) 19:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Scope Creep: I have made several changes to Camilo Prieto Valderrama's article, as he is a leading environmentalist in Colombia with books and awards. I think it deserves a Wikipedia entry. I hope the article is more appropriate now. Anyway, I'm going to ask for help to keep it. Thank you for your participation in improving Wikipedia.-- 3erres ( talk) 16:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello ::@ Scope creep:, He has several books published and is quite popular on Colombian television, in addition to having received important awards in his country. He is also an outstanding activist-- 3erres ( talk) 17:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Thankyou for your kind comments. Please see WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability (academics)) and you will see patently that this profile falls way short of WP: notability. It will also be noted that h-index that you mentioned has been mentioned below in the article, but the use of a citation metric alone is problematic in deeming an academic notable is highly questionable. I have not yet undone the edit you made, but have written to you here to highlight the reason this is a non-notable academic as far as WP is concerned. The WP:PUFF side if things we have touched upon already. Dudewheresmywallet ( talk) 12:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the feedback, I've been using Wiki my entire life, thought I would try my hand at helping the system that's granted me access to endless knowledge! Will be sure to remember that for the future! Missing Sig by user:ChegenWall. Signed by scope_creep Talk 08:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
scope_creep Talk 08:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Hi there Scope creep, thank you for taking the time to look through the Draft:e-flux submission. I've made a handful of edits, including deleting large chunks of text and some headings as you suggested. If you have a chance, would you mind taking a look to see if it looks okay now? Many thanks! It's much appreciated. Hallieedit ( talk) 17:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Any objections to me pushing Draft:Naomi Leshem back into mainspace? The editor Bibliof massively improved it and it now has proof of notability via collections, and is well sourced. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 16:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Scope creep. I'm not sure what you were trying to do at COIN, but you remove many comments without explanation. I'm restoring everything that was removed. Maybe you accidentally worked from an old version? -- Hipal/Ronz ( talk) 18:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi! noticed you're a spam patroller, so I wanted to reach out as I'm not sure what's the best course of action for potential cross-wiki spam. This article was recently deleted here on EN. However, it looks like it's now being re-created across many wiki projects by this user. It was created on AR, FR, ID, JA, KO, MS, and many others. I'm not sure where to lodge the report, but I hope you can help look into it or point me in the right direction? Many thanks! — Infogapp1 ( talk) 00:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
TH and ID have deleted the spam articles in their respective projects (see Wikidata). I was wondering, during one of the older SPA investigations if this user was ever connected to the group? I just find it odd for it to be creating Chinese version of the article and if my memory serves me right, that same editor has been editing the now-deleted EN article and I don't see any COI declaration on its page. Just find it odd and curious. — Infogapp1 ( talk) 11:43, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent articles, including Simexco and Simex, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent articles, including Simexco and Simex, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
A belated welcome back. I had not noticed you had been unblocked and my ping was more in hope that you would be soon rather than knowing that you had been. Thanks for your comment at the FA canditature. Would you mind explicitly stating you carried out a substantial review at GA? At the moment, your support looks like a lightweight "drive-by" comment. If you've not been involved in FAs before, there is some advice on participating at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates#Nomination procedure. Spinning Spark 10:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Done as requested.
Regards PawełMM ( talk) 16:06, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of bays of Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Millport.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:27, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
I am a little confused on what bare url's are. I thought that bare url's are the url address off of the website. I initially had them through-out this an other articles. I am replacing them with the cite-web templates. Although, I have replaced all of url's I originally had on the above-mentioned article, you still placed a tag asking to clean up bare url's. Please explain what I am not doing correctly. Thanking you in advance. Vannessajg ( talk) 13:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I thinking that might be it and actually started changing them before I asked. I just wanted to get the correct info before continuing. Thank you for your quick reply. Vannessajg ( talk) 15:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there Scope creep, thank you for taking the time to look through the Draft:e-flux submission. I've made a handful of edits, including deleting large chunks of text and some headings as you suggested. If you have a chance, would you mind taking a look to see if it looks okay now? Many thanks! It's much appreciated. Hallieedit ( talk) 17:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hitro talk 07:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 08:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary ( talk) 08:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 08:39, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Thanks for uploading File:Brian Walden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:46, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
scope_creep Talk 08:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of bays of Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bell Bay.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:15, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Scope creep!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk)
14:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Hello, Scope creep!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk)
14:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
|
Hi, I'm North8000. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Çiçek Islands, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 22:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Allenjambalaya ( talk) 13:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Hi, this is regarding the copyright issue with Dvaitadvaita that you have raised. Actually I only created separate pages from existing Wikipedia page. So was there a copyright violation in the previous Wikipedia page Kumāra Sampradaya from which I copied the text? Would be glad to discuss this in the Kumāra Sampradaya talk page. Maybe we need to find out who authored the previous article. Thank you for raising the issue. ( User talk:Madhav kiran sodum) —Preceding undated comment added 15:24, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Greetings. No discussion page was created for this AfD. Page Curation seems to be especially buggy lately in this regard--I'd recommend sticking to Twinkle for AfD nominations. Thanks. -- Finngall talk 17:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Scope creep
Thank you for creating Zawiya of Sidi Abd el-Aziz.
User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Google book reference exist.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
scope_creep Talk 00:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
![]() June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
In case you missed it on RDH: see Red Orchestra (espionage). 2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588 ( talk) 20:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
I saw your new RD thread, which looks good. If it were me I'd just remove the translations to "red chapel" and leave it at red orchestra. But, I'll defer to Jmar67. 2601:648:8202:96B0:A598:FF3D:8240:4E2B ( talk) 01:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sulfurboy ( talk) 23:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Incidents#FloridaArmy_and_AfC_woes.
Sulfurboy (
talk)
04:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Ymblanter ( talk) 05:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Garth Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aberfeldy ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
Dear scope_creep Talk, I'm writing you because you nominated speedy deletion of an article created by me (Hello Wood). I ask you to cancel your speedy deletion. I see you flagged it as "promotional" but I rather see it as an encyclopedic content about an internationally acclaimed and awarded design studio. Both I and Hello Wood have Hungarian roots, but I tried to write the article without any bias. If any of my words, sentences seem promotional please advise me how to correct them or feel free to correct them yourself. I don't see why this article has to be removed.
Thanks, Littletkforyou
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
12:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Scope creep as per information at WP:AFC/RBS, I would like to draw your attention to Draft:Pieter De Bruyne which you might be interested to review. Thank you. ~ Amkgp ✉ 06:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Scope creep, you left a comment about inline citations in de article Draft:Pieter De Bruyne i added some. Can you check it out pls. thx 2A02:1812:1C20:2300:892E:B2A2:24CD:3E72 ( talk) 17:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Scope creep, thank you for your help. I ve added 10 references.
Hi, I moved User Scope creep/Sandbox B21 from mainspace to your userspace. Schazjmd (talk) 14:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Scope creep. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pruthvi Ambaar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: there's considerably more sources than there were when it was nominated last time. This needs to go back to AfD. Thank you. Ged UK 07:11, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Orchestra (espionage), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint-Gilles ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Since you have participated in creating articles on Scottish island settlements and dealing with drafts I have started drafts at Draft:Kinloch, Rùm, Draft:Lagg, Jura, Draft:Cullipool and Draft:Tarbert, Jura. I'm not sure if these meet the inclusion criteria but I'm wandering if you have any more info for them, thanks. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 21:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
First of all, well done for finding that discussion. I recall the sense of frustration well! As I remember it the thrust of the argument was "there are lots of places that are very small now but at least some of them have an interesting history that could be fleshed out" vs "why clutter the place up with articles that say next to nothing and have little hope of every doing so, they are little more than an expression of the obvious, why not just have a list?". I doubt that much has changed since then save that I think it is clear that over the years small new articles continue to be created at a rate that is faster than our collective ability or inclination to turn those that have some prospect of improvement into something of substance. From my perspective there is little point in grumbling about this and I don't see that it causes any harm provided everything is accurate, not subject to vandalism (a lot of them must be unwatched) and accurately categorised. (As an aside its amazing the number of red links for the cats that were discussed back then.) I don't know if that's helpful. The best way to get info about substantially cleared villages may be either from local history books or maybe the
Statistical Accounts of Scotland, Canmore etc. I have very little such material to hand and the
Gazetteer for Scotland does not seem to have added much new for a wee while. In short, I tend not to write much about settlements as such & I am more mellow than a decade ago and don't see a genuine problem with very small places if people are inspired to write about them. If it was me, writing about say
Cullipool, at minimum I'd want to add at least one para that might make people think e.g. culled from this rather poignant press piece:
"Luing recalls tragedy that claimed sailors". {{
cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1=
(
help) from
The Oban Times but that's just me.
Ben
Mac
Dui
09:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC) PS
I am in shock - that's what you get for taking some time off I suppose. If I can be bothered I might start a convo somewhere that attempts to get some kind of clear policy for Scottish island names.
Hi again,
Since I see you are an art lover, would you accept reviewing this article on
Pieter Pourbus I have enriched and worked on a lot?
There are still mainly 2 types of issues:
1/ sources in some paragraphs: I am working on these points ( I have all literature available in my library).
2/ pure editing in a good (but not too basic) English (if you have time and patience, please read [
the dialogue with another editor], who admitted he has no knowledge in art history, and accepted I revert some of his own edits)
I have worked on purpose on the images, so that their size give at first sight an impression of the real size of the actual painting; and also so that the description sticks to standards art historians currently use (it is also more encyclopaedic). And will continue to check some who lack this kind of edit yet.
Will be glad to have your news, and help.
Have a good day!
--
Emigré55 (
talk)
10:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Lapablo ( talk) 16:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)I'm loving the amount of Loch articles you've created, some naming updates to provide consistency across bodies of water is under way with guidelines outlined at WikiProject Lakes name (region) format is suggested for disambiguation, feel free to add yourself as a member and help shape the direction since you seem to have an overlap in interest. Help us track these by adding {{WikiProject Lakes}} to the talk page. There are a number of lochs on the list of lochs of Scotland needing renaming for consistency which helps to disambiguate from any settlement. I understand terms matter which is why I added lochs explicitly as scope for the project as loch vs lake was talked about in the page history as being important. Also the body of water location field doesn't seem the right place for the templates of "NO175427" according the doc of the infobox this should be city or other region. It would be preferable that the British Grid be a separate parameter rather than conflated in the location field which has no context for those who do not live within the system. What do you say we join forces and move forward with consistency of bodies of water on Wikipedia together? Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? ( talk) 09:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi @ Emigré55: I managed to look at the above article There are several section that have been expanded and not be cited at all. It needs additional references in those section. If you need a hand, give me a shout. The article subject is eminently notable. Well done for updating it. The next task is to reference it. scope_creep Talk 16:06, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Scope creep,
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loch Benachally is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loch Benachally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Stop biting the newbie ( talk) 03:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
I brought sources that the group is 5th place in the Israeli fashion sector, I brought a source worth over $ 100 million, I brought a source that it has 170 branches in Israel I brought a source that the most successful models in Israel - Moran Atias and Bar Refaeli have been the representative of the company for years.
What other sources do you need? Bar ( talk) 04:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
f sources, I don't sufficient to show it is notable. With 170 stores it should be notable but I cant see a lot. scope_creep Talk 08:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Zanimum ( talk) 19:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Many thanks for reviewing The Stonemason (book); much appreciated. Jonathan A Jones ( talk) 20:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
This is part of a serial mass deletion campaign and nothing new based on the message I left on the user's talk page. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 04:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey! Thank you so much for your work reviewing so many articles :) I was wondering if you might be able to join in the deletion discussion of this page /info/en/?search=Ayana_Jordan. Based on notability criteria, she appears to meet them but I am getting pushback and would like more eyes on this deletion discussion. If you have time, I would really appreciate it. Microglia145 ( talk) 20:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia is supposed to be a learning environment, not a propaganda page. Ms Cullors is an admited Marxist in her own words and it is relevant to inform readers of her page. Signed by user:Truthtrain by scope_creep Talk 22:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary ( talk) 08:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Hi thanks for the message. Googlescholar was indeed checked, but you realise beyond citations there's very little qualifying this academic as a notable Prof- meriting a Wikipedia article. I have no idea what H-score is, but my impression is if we use citation metrics as Wikipedia level notability, I suspect we'd be creating articles for all Ivy league professors. That plus the article seemed to be a self-promoting article by himself or his staff. Dudewheresmywallet ( talk) 11:18, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello dear Scope_creep. Can you help remove the "Delete Tag"? toswo Mrloopitus ( talk) 19:25, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I've seen you suggest the page I've written Solid-state electrolyte doesn't follow the tone or style of Wikipedia. Could you please give me some practical examples on what is wrong and how to improve the page? Thanks -- Sikko94 ( talk) 09:22, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
. I like to keep communication on Wikipedia, but this involves information from outside of Wikipedia.-- Eostrix ( 🦉 hoot hoot🦉]) 10:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I don't have the time right now to plow through the article to find the parts that made me stumble and re-read. But as a starter, there is "h the Gestapo, was i" - the subject is separated from the predicate by a comma. That's not an example of being turgid, but it does make for difficult reading. I'll try to find time later to get more examples. Kdammers ( talk) 16:05, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Ingratis. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Monastery of Vallbona de les Monjas, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Ingratis ( talk) 22:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello Scope Creep |
Thank-you for the suggestion, however if i were to
expand the Macedonian Hussar Regiment article Jingiby would delete the information. You could possibly help me. Jingiby thinks i am a sockpuppet of a previous user. However i have only had two accounts, this is my second wikipedia account. Regards Kajmakcalan ( talk) 14:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC) |
Movidatabase (
talk)
21:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi I have provided links and a lot of information about a famous Italian director. I ask for it to be published
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hitro talk 10:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Hi Scope creep! I saw you added a tag for cleanup on Destiny Rogers. I am just a bit confused on the tag, since it says there are references in pink. What does that mean exactly? Thanks! -- Divine618 ( talk) 15:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I was writing and completing an article called Ava Bahram that has been deleted by you. Please revive the article on my home page. I want to edit and complete the article. Regards Gimbouri ( talk) 19:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Scope Creep: I have made several changes to Camilo Prieto Valderrama's article, as he is a leading environmentalist in Colombia with books and awards. I think it deserves a Wikipedia entry. I hope the article is more appropriate now. Anyway, I'm going to ask for help to keep it. Thank you for your participation in improving Wikipedia.-- 3erres ( talk) 16:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello ::@ Scope creep:, He has several books published and is quite popular on Colombian television, in addition to having received important awards in his country. He is also an outstanding activist-- 3erres ( talk) 17:32, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Thankyou for your kind comments. Please see WP:PROF (Wikipedia:Notability (academics)) and you will see patently that this profile falls way short of WP: notability. It will also be noted that h-index that you mentioned has been mentioned below in the article, but the use of a citation metric alone is problematic in deeming an academic notable is highly questionable. I have not yet undone the edit you made, but have written to you here to highlight the reason this is a non-notable academic as far as WP is concerned. The WP:PUFF side if things we have touched upon already. Dudewheresmywallet ( talk) 12:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the feedback, I've been using Wiki my entire life, thought I would try my hand at helping the system that's granted me access to endless knowledge! Will be sure to remember that for the future! Missing Sig by user:ChegenWall. Signed by scope_creep Talk 08:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
scope_creep Talk 08:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Hi there Scope creep, thank you for taking the time to look through the Draft:e-flux submission. I've made a handful of edits, including deleting large chunks of text and some headings as you suggested. If you have a chance, would you mind taking a look to see if it looks okay now? Many thanks! It's much appreciated. Hallieedit ( talk) 17:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Any objections to me pushing Draft:Naomi Leshem back into mainspace? The editor Bibliof massively improved it and it now has proof of notability via collections, and is well sourced. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 16:43, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi Scope creep. I'm not sure what you were trying to do at COIN, but you remove many comments without explanation. I'm restoring everything that was removed. Maybe you accidentally worked from an old version? -- Hipal/Ronz ( talk) 18:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi! noticed you're a spam patroller, so I wanted to reach out as I'm not sure what's the best course of action for potential cross-wiki spam. This article was recently deleted here on EN. However, it looks like it's now being re-created across many wiki projects by this user. It was created on AR, FR, ID, JA, KO, MS, and many others. I'm not sure where to lodge the report, but I hope you can help look into it or point me in the right direction? Many thanks! — Infogapp1 ( talk) 00:22, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
TH and ID have deleted the spam articles in their respective projects (see Wikidata). I was wondering, during one of the older SPA investigations if this user was ever connected to the group? I just find it odd for it to be creating Chinese version of the article and if my memory serves me right, that same editor has been editing the now-deleted EN article and I don't see any COI declaration on its page. Just find it odd and curious. — Infogapp1 ( talk) 11:43, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent articles, including Simexco and Simex, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent articles, including Simexco and Simex, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:41, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
A belated welcome back. I had not noticed you had been unblocked and my ping was more in hope that you would be soon rather than knowing that you had been. Thanks for your comment at the FA canditature. Would you mind explicitly stating you carried out a substantial review at GA? At the moment, your support looks like a lightweight "drive-by" comment. If you've not been involved in FAs before, there is some advice on participating at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates#Nomination procedure. Spinning Spark 10:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Done as requested.
Regards PawełMM ( talk) 16:06, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of bays of Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Millport.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:27, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
I am a little confused on what bare url's are. I thought that bare url's are the url address off of the website. I initially had them through-out this an other articles. I am replacing them with the cite-web templates. Although, I have replaced all of url's I originally had on the above-mentioned article, you still placed a tag asking to clean up bare url's. Please explain what I am not doing correctly. Thanking you in advance. Vannessajg ( talk) 13:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I thinking that might be it and actually started changing them before I asked. I just wanted to get the correct info before continuing. Thank you for your quick reply. Vannessajg ( talk) 15:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi there Scope creep, thank you for taking the time to look through the Draft:e-flux submission. I've made a handful of edits, including deleting large chunks of text and some headings as you suggested. If you have a chance, would you mind taking a look to see if it looks okay now? Many thanks! It's much appreciated. Hallieedit ( talk) 17:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hitro talk 07:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 08:06, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary ( talk) 08:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 08:39, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Thanks for uploading File:Brian Walden.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:46, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
scope_creep Talk 08:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of bays of Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bell Bay.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:15, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Scope creep!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk)
14:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
|