![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
![]() |
The New Page Reviewer's Gold Award | |
For over 5,000 article reviews during 2019. Thank you very much for your help at New Pages Patrol! - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 05:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC) |
Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 05:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
As I have once again seen you review a page of mine (in this case a redirect Institutiones Gai), I just wanted to send this goat to you as a token of appreciation for your valuable (but often unrecognized) work!
WatkynBassett (
talk)
19:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
I have some things I don't understand so I ask you. What did you mean by "I'd recommend that both Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/WorldCreaterFighter#09_August_2022 and this discussion be closed as behavioral matches ". Are you telling you can block everyone without needing to know if all three of our IP addresses are connected? I really hope that is not the case because than all it takes is making some assumptions.
Behavioral evidence: errant spaces with their question marks (Defending myself) I chose this because is easy and takes little time to do. I can provide more evidence but it will take up a lot of blank spaces. Hunan201p said this: "Ghizz Archus and Vamlos/DerekHistorian always add a number of errant spaces with their question marks" Rossguill thinks my behavior matches Ghizz Archus. Everyone can see Ghizz made his last post from his last date which is 12:49, 1 September 2022 (UTC). Everyone can see he always makes spaces between his sentences and question marks. My question marks are always joined with my sentences. today and yesterday and if your still not satisfied look at my yesterday discussion with Quishufang at the bottom /info/en/?search=User_talk:Qiushufang. All the examples were before Ghizz. Now you can't say I displayed a similar writing style to Ghizz and the others.
I really hope everything is fair. 82.36.220.78 ( talk) 22:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Steven Beseau on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Maddie Ziegler on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.You were either a participant in WP:DS2021 (the Arbitration Committee's Discretionary Sanctions reform process) or requested to be notified about future developments regarding DS reform. The Committee now presents Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions/2021-22_review/Phase_II_consultation, and invites your feedback. Your patience has been appreciated. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Please remove my reviewer rights. Some people found problems with my reviews, and I would like to go to NPP school to gain more experience. CollectiveSolidarity ( talk) 01:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Reviewer's Silver Award | |
For over 2,000 article reviews during 2018. Well done! Keep up the good work! - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved barnstars. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Rosguill, I started a new page on neuro-symbolic AI, and received a {{copy edit|date=August 2022}} request, but was unclear as to what needed to be addressed as it mentions grammar, style, cohesion, tone, and spelling. Could you please tell me what to address?
In the meantime, I will simplify some of the sentences to enhance readability, but I am just guessing at this point as to what you are looking for in a new page that I am lacking. Thanks!
Veritas Aeterna ( talk) 01:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
I kindly ask you to suggest me the shortcomings of the article created by me so I can update it.
Thank you
Lostinniagarafalls (
talk)
14:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
The article Janessa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
non notable person
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jax 0677 (
talk)
17:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avenida de Alberto Alcocer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chamartín.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill! I was going through a list of potential cut-n-paste moves, which contains Dodge Avenger Concept, a page you deleted. Was this the content of the page before it was BLAR'd? If so, would you please be able to perform a WP:HISTMERGE to Dodge Avenger? Thanks! House Blaster talk 00:34, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed that you relisted the RFD for "Stanley (cars)" stating that there isn't an agreement as to which section of the article to retarget to. I actually disagree with that assessment since the disambig page was cleaned up and the section that was originally proposed to retarget the redirect to was changed to a different name. So essentially it's the same section but a different name. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
I just need help putting a source in the Article Jena ( talk) 00:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
( t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
I asked for a consensus which the user disagreed on the talk page with and now they are edit warring what shpuld I do should I leave it? LionAjk ( talk) 14:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I was just notified that you had retitled an article I worked on. While there are plenty of articles that are titled Historiography of..., there are also articles with "Historiography" following such as Dark Ages (Historiography), Ethiopian historiography and others. IMP, this retitling makes the article harder to find, less accessible, and seems to limit the focus to spread alone when the article covers much more than that. I did not revert this change because I respect your input, but I do strongly disagree with this move. Jenhawk777 ( talk) 18:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
We strive to make titles on Wikipedia as consistent as possible with other titles on similar subjects. There are two main areas, however, where Wikipedians have consistently shown that consistency does not control: Disambiguation. For instance, just because Georgia (country) exists, there is no reason to have articles titled, for instance, Azerbaijan (country), Armenia (country), etc.
Parenthetical disambiguation, i.e. adding a disambiguating term in parentheses after the ambiguous name: Wikipedia's standard disambiguation technique when none of the other solutions lead to an optimal article title. Example: The word "mercury" has distinct meanings that do not have sufficiently common alternative names, so we instead use parenthetical disambiguation: Mercury (element), Mercury (mythology), and Mercury (planet).
Hi! Sorry to bother you again. I clicked on Historiography of the Christianization of the Roman Empire in my watchlist and wikidata said the page doesn't exist. I must be missing something! Jenhawk777 ( talk) 15:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Rosguill Help! Someone came along and made a title change removing historiography with no discussion or reason given in the edit summary and it has now created a loop that won't let me undo it! It says an administrator can fix it. Can you help? Jenhawk777 ( talk) 16:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Could you please have a look at my appeal here: [1]? Thank you. Grand master 18:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Rosguill. First of all, thank you for your intervention at the RSN regarding Xhufi. I would like to ask, considering your comment here, [2] do you mind giving me some insight on when BLP can be invoked and when it is safe to describe a source for their extremist views? I will really appreciate some insight to the related question posted at the Teahouse. [3], if you don't mind. My question at the teahouse may appear unecessarily unclear and confusing, but I admit I am abit confused myself. - ❖ SilentResident ❖ ( talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 18:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Benjamin Banneker on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill, i was wondering if you've faced this problem lately? If you do face it, please use the date filters to move on to the next day's redirects, and ping Novem Linguae and me, so that we can debug it. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 07:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
I’m his assistant situation in Irans is very horrible he’s been jailed and now everyhthing is so heavy can you please esit for me v i’m nit sure how to do it ! Please Xxmadamex ( talk) 21:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello I believe that this 2 new ip [ [4]],[ [5]] are the same person who continue to post unsourced and biased edits and reverts on Karađorđe page. Can you please protect the page ? Thank you. Theonewithreason ( talk) 22:46 02.May 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
Hi Rosguill, I'd like to ask if you could take part in the AfD on Verdis? /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Verdis_(2nd_nomination)#Verdis
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in
Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and
consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.please do an article about it 2A03:2880:30FF:78:0:0:FACE:B00C ( talk) 17:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill,
I noticed this online link
[6]. This might result in more disruption in the cesspool known as
WP:AA2 and
WP:KURDS.
Google translate: ""The first spark was ignited in order to correct and organize the unfounded claims we have seen on Wikipedia recently. r/turkviki was established. Let's get organized from there."
Another link:
[7]
Google translate:
[8] "Friends, this subreddit was founded on the termination of unfounded claims made on Wikipedia. Our aim is to put an end to the unfounded allegations made on Wikipedia, the propaganda activities targeting our country and nation, to express the truth and correct the mistakes."
Google translate of one of the comments:
[9] "we need a larger audience, salaried employees of wikipedia, and I don't know how effective we can be against the current Turkish hatred"
-
LouisAragon (
talk)
19:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Kara (South Korean group) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bela River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bela Reka.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey. Thanks for adding the DS/alert to the editor, I was in the process of doing that after making sure I'd cleaned up after the move. There was a redirect left after I moved the page back to the original target; Russian intervention in Ukrainian civil war. I was about to WP:G3 nominate it, but then I remembered the part of WP:CIVIL about referring to (potentially) good faith edits as vandalism. I'm not sure if I can WP:G6 it, because none of the four criteria for that apply. Do I need to RfD it or can I get away with a G3 in this case? Sideswipe9th ( talk) 18:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
I'm not really sure who to get assistance from on these matters as I'm still learning the reins of Wikipedia but a user keeps reverting the officeholder information of Vít Jedlička. Could you maybe check the talk page and review this? Thank you! MicroSupporter ( talk) 15:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
What it says on the tin. I've been wanting to apply for the perm for a while (well before I hit 500 mainspace edits) but I don't think that I am perfectly fit for the role. Do you have a spot open?
Asparagusus (interaction) 02:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Would it be possible to explain what you are asking us at DRN to do with respect to Pellumb Xhufi? The basic dispute appears to have to do with reliability of Xhufi as a source. That is normally a task for the reliable source noticeboard, but one of the parties posted an RFC there, and you recommended that they go to DRN. The other problem that I have is that this is a dispute with eight editors. I don't normally try to moderate cases with that many editors, because they are more appropriate for RFC, except that there are questions about whether the RFC is properly presented.
So what are you asking us to do at DRN with this dispute? Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I feel like my intention in posting comment about claims of Florida voter fraud has been misconstrued.
I am not tryin to start a discussion about this topic per se, I'm trying to suggest that this is appropriate for incorporating into the article. I've include a brief overview and some pertinent details, based on what has been reported to date. Is there some reason that sort of content is not appropriate for an article talk page? Fabrickator ( talk) 21:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my redirect page!
Tise exists (cool) (
talk)
00:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
While I understand it may not be mentioned in the article *yet*, that shouldn't be a call to revert - if anything, that should be a call to *add that information into the article*. Amyipdev ( talk) 15:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
rape and torture. That having been said, I probably wouldn't get involved with that change, and would leave it for you to sort out with the other editors interested in the article. signed, Rosguill talk 15:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Bharat Jodo Yatra on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Crystal Palace F.C. (1861) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
And regards! Correogsk or Gustavo ( Editrocito or Heme aquí) 10:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Sir, I would like to know why the king Thor page wasn't eligible and reverted back? As per my understanding, the page was edited in a basic comic book character page. Please respond! Thank you! Lord kai07 ( talk) 06:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Sorry. I actually didn't even realise that. Also When the other editors mentioned real world notability. I didn't knew what it meant. Sorry for the mistake. Is it possible to add better sources like this and revert the page back? Lord kai07 ( talk) 13:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly
explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your
common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js
to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
![]() |
The New Page Reviewer's Gold Award | |
For over 5,000 article reviews during 2019. Thank you very much for your help at New Pages Patrol! - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 05:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC) |
Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 05:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
As I have once again seen you review a page of mine (in this case a redirect Institutiones Gai), I just wanted to send this goat to you as a token of appreciation for your valuable (but often unrecognized) work!
WatkynBassett (
talk)
19:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
I have some things I don't understand so I ask you. What did you mean by "I'd recommend that both Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/WorldCreaterFighter#09_August_2022 and this discussion be closed as behavioral matches ". Are you telling you can block everyone without needing to know if all three of our IP addresses are connected? I really hope that is not the case because than all it takes is making some assumptions.
Behavioral evidence: errant spaces with their question marks (Defending myself) I chose this because is easy and takes little time to do. I can provide more evidence but it will take up a lot of blank spaces. Hunan201p said this: "Ghizz Archus and Vamlos/DerekHistorian always add a number of errant spaces with their question marks" Rossguill thinks my behavior matches Ghizz Archus. Everyone can see Ghizz made his last post from his last date which is 12:49, 1 September 2022 (UTC). Everyone can see he always makes spaces between his sentences and question marks. My question marks are always joined with my sentences. today and yesterday and if your still not satisfied look at my yesterday discussion with Quishufang at the bottom /info/en/?search=User_talk:Qiushufang. All the examples were before Ghizz. Now you can't say I displayed a similar writing style to Ghizz and the others.
I really hope everything is fair. 82.36.220.78 ( talk) 22:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Steven Beseau on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Maddie Ziegler on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.You were either a participant in WP:DS2021 (the Arbitration Committee's Discretionary Sanctions reform process) or requested to be notified about future developments regarding DS reform. The Committee now presents Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Discretionary_sanctions/2021-22_review/Phase_II_consultation, and invites your feedback. Your patience has been appreciated. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 17:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Please remove my reviewer rights. Some people found problems with my reviews, and I would like to go to NPP school to gain more experience. CollectiveSolidarity ( talk) 01:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Reviewer's Silver Award | |
For over 2,000 article reviews during 2018. Well done! Keep up the good work! - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC) |
Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved barnstars. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:04, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Rosguill, I started a new page on neuro-symbolic AI, and received a {{copy edit|date=August 2022}} request, but was unclear as to what needed to be addressed as it mentions grammar, style, cohesion, tone, and spelling. Could you please tell me what to address?
In the meantime, I will simplify some of the sentences to enhance readability, but I am just guessing at this point as to what you are looking for in a new page that I am lacking. Thanks!
Veritas Aeterna ( talk) 01:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
I kindly ask you to suggest me the shortcomings of the article created by me so I can update it.
Thank you
Lostinniagarafalls (
talk)
14:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
The article Janessa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
non notable person
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Jax 0677 (
talk)
17:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avenida de Alberto Alcocer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chamartín.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill! I was going through a list of potential cut-n-paste moves, which contains Dodge Avenger Concept, a page you deleted. Was this the content of the page before it was BLAR'd? If so, would you please be able to perform a WP:HISTMERGE to Dodge Avenger? Thanks! House Blaster talk 00:34, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey! I noticed that you relisted the RFD for "Stanley (cars)" stating that there isn't an agreement as to which section of the article to retarget to. I actually disagree with that assessment since the disambig page was cleaned up and the section that was originally proposed to retarget the redirect to was changed to a different name. So essentially it's the same section but a different name. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
I just need help putting a source in the Article Jena ( talk) 00:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
( t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
I asked for a consensus which the user disagreed on the talk page with and now they are edit warring what shpuld I do should I leave it? LionAjk ( talk) 14:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I was just notified that you had retitled an article I worked on. While there are plenty of articles that are titled Historiography of..., there are also articles with "Historiography" following such as Dark Ages (Historiography), Ethiopian historiography and others. IMP, this retitling makes the article harder to find, less accessible, and seems to limit the focus to spread alone when the article covers much more than that. I did not revert this change because I respect your input, but I do strongly disagree with this move. Jenhawk777 ( talk) 18:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
We strive to make titles on Wikipedia as consistent as possible with other titles on similar subjects. There are two main areas, however, where Wikipedians have consistently shown that consistency does not control: Disambiguation. For instance, just because Georgia (country) exists, there is no reason to have articles titled, for instance, Azerbaijan (country), Armenia (country), etc.
Parenthetical disambiguation, i.e. adding a disambiguating term in parentheses after the ambiguous name: Wikipedia's standard disambiguation technique when none of the other solutions lead to an optimal article title. Example: The word "mercury" has distinct meanings that do not have sufficiently common alternative names, so we instead use parenthetical disambiguation: Mercury (element), Mercury (mythology), and Mercury (planet).
Hi! Sorry to bother you again. I clicked on Historiography of the Christianization of the Roman Empire in my watchlist and wikidata said the page doesn't exist. I must be missing something! Jenhawk777 ( talk) 15:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Rosguill Help! Someone came along and made a title change removing historiography with no discussion or reason given in the edit summary and it has now created a loop that won't let me undo it! It says an administrator can fix it. Can you help? Jenhawk777 ( talk) 16:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi. Could you please have a look at my appeal here: [1]? Thank you. Grand master 18:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Rosguill. First of all, thank you for your intervention at the RSN regarding Xhufi. I would like to ask, considering your comment here, [2] do you mind giving me some insight on when BLP can be invoked and when it is safe to describe a source for their extremist views? I will really appreciate some insight to the related question posted at the Teahouse. [3], if you don't mind. My question at the teahouse may appear unecessarily unclear and confusing, but I admit I am abit confused myself. - ❖ SilentResident ❖ ( talk ✉ | contribs ✎) 18:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Benjamin Banneker on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill, i was wondering if you've faced this problem lately? If you do face it, please use the date filters to move on to the next day's redirects, and ping Novem Linguae and me, so that we can debug it. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 07:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
I’m his assistant situation in Irans is very horrible he’s been jailed and now everyhthing is so heavy can you please esit for me v i’m nit sure how to do it ! Please Xxmadamex ( talk) 21:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello I believe that this 2 new ip [ [4]],[ [5]] are the same person who continue to post unsourced and biased edits and reverts on Karađorđe page. Can you please protect the page ? Thank you. Theonewithreason ( talk) 22:46 02.May 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
Hi Rosguill, I'd like to ask if you could take part in the AfD on Verdis? /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Verdis_(2nd_nomination)#Verdis
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in
Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and
consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.please do an article about it 2A03:2880:30FF:78:0:0:FACE:B00C ( talk) 17:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Rosguill,
I noticed this online link
[6]. This might result in more disruption in the cesspool known as
WP:AA2 and
WP:KURDS.
Google translate: ""The first spark was ignited in order to correct and organize the unfounded claims we have seen on Wikipedia recently. r/turkviki was established. Let's get organized from there."
Another link:
[7]
Google translate:
[8] "Friends, this subreddit was founded on the termination of unfounded claims made on Wikipedia. Our aim is to put an end to the unfounded allegations made on Wikipedia, the propaganda activities targeting our country and nation, to express the truth and correct the mistakes."
Google translate of one of the comments:
[9] "we need a larger audience, salaried employees of wikipedia, and I don't know how effective we can be against the current Turkish hatred"
-
LouisAragon (
talk)
19:50, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Kara (South Korean group) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bela River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bela Reka.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey. Thanks for adding the DS/alert to the editor, I was in the process of doing that after making sure I'd cleaned up after the move. There was a redirect left after I moved the page back to the original target; Russian intervention in Ukrainian civil war. I was about to WP:G3 nominate it, but then I remembered the part of WP:CIVIL about referring to (potentially) good faith edits as vandalism. I'm not sure if I can WP:G6 it, because none of the four criteria for that apply. Do I need to RfD it or can I get away with a G3 in this case? Sideswipe9th ( talk) 18:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
I'm not really sure who to get assistance from on these matters as I'm still learning the reins of Wikipedia but a user keeps reverting the officeholder information of Vít Jedlička. Could you maybe check the talk page and review this? Thank you! MicroSupporter ( talk) 15:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
What it says on the tin. I've been wanting to apply for the perm for a while (well before I hit 500 mainspace edits) but I don't think that I am perfectly fit for the role. Do you have a spot open?
Asparagusus (interaction) 02:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Would it be possible to explain what you are asking us at DRN to do with respect to Pellumb Xhufi? The basic dispute appears to have to do with reliability of Xhufi as a source. That is normally a task for the reliable source noticeboard, but one of the parties posted an RFC there, and you recommended that they go to DRN. The other problem that I have is that this is a dispute with eight editors. I don't normally try to moderate cases with that many editors, because they are more appropriate for RFC, except that there are questions about whether the RFC is properly presented.
So what are you asking us to do at DRN with this dispute? Robert McClenon ( talk) 17:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I feel like my intention in posting comment about claims of Florida voter fraud has been misconstrued.
I am not tryin to start a discussion about this topic per se, I'm trying to suggest that this is appropriate for incorporating into the article. I've include a brief overview and some pertinent details, based on what has been reported to date. Is there some reason that sort of content is not appropriate for an article talk page? Fabrickator ( talk) 21:29, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my redirect page!
Tise exists (cool) (
talk)
00:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
While I understand it may not be mentioned in the article *yet*, that shouldn't be a call to revert - if anything, that should be a call to *add that information into the article*. Amyipdev ( talk) 15:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
rape and torture. That having been said, I probably wouldn't get involved with that change, and would leave it for you to sort out with the other editors interested in the article. signed, Rosguill talk 15:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Bharat Jodo Yatra on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested at
Talk:Crystal Palace F.C. (1861) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of
Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by
removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
And regards! Correogsk or Gustavo ( Editrocito or Heme aquí) 10:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Sir, I would like to know why the king Thor page wasn't eligible and reverted back? As per my understanding, the page was edited in a basic comic book character page. Please respond! Thank you! Lord kai07 ( talk) 06:38, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Sorry. I actually didn't even realise that. Also When the other editors mentioned real world notability. I didn't knew what it meant. Sorry for the mistake. Is it possible to add better sources like this and revert the page back? Lord kai07 ( talk) 13:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello Rosguill,
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly
explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your
common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js
to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.