This is not the page to nominate yourself or another editor to be an administrator. To do so, please follow these instructions. |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: ( successful, unsuccessful) |
Candidate | Type | Result | Date of close | Tally | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | O | N | % | ||||
Sdkb | RfA | Successful | 16 Feb 2024 | 265 | 2 | 0 | 99 |
The Night Watch | RfA | Successful | 11 Feb 2024 | 215 | 63 | 13 | 77 |
Red-tailed hawk | RfA | Successful | 5 Jan 2024 | 207 | 6 | 8 | 97 |
Robertsky | RfA | Successful | 3 Jan 2024 | 196 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
Interstellarity | RfA | Withdrawn by candidate | 2 Jan 2024 | 5 | 18 | 2 | 22 |
Tails Wx | RfA | Withdrawn by candidate | 29 Dec 2023 | 143 | 35 | 10 | 80 |
|
Hello everyone. I just wanted to make a note and say that I am very thankful to every single person who has seen my work, supported, guided, and helped me over the last 13 years since I have been here on Wikipedia. I have learned a lot here, but there is still a lot to learn and experience here on Wikipedia as an editor. Wikipedia has given me tremendous knowledge, and I will always be there to serve Wikipedia as an administrator till the end of time and till my last breath. I will run for RfA one day when I am ready. Thank you. TheGeneralUser ( talk) 23:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Per
Proposal 3B of 2024 RFA Review that was recently closed as successful, the first 2 days will be discussion-only for the next five RfAs that are not closed per WP:SNOW or WP:NOTNOW or to RfAs opened in the next six months – whichever happens first.
Soni (
talk) 06:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Cheers, Sdkb talk 18:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)In order to encourage editors to run, I'd like to see this implemented in a way that allows those who sense that the !voting phase may not go as well as they'd hoped to bow out gracefully after the discussion phase with as little stigma attached as possible. One way to get at that would be to require candidates to affirmatively assent to proceed to the !voting phase as the discussion phase nears its end; if they do not, the default course of action would be to end the RfA with a neutral (not red) background and a note like
This is an archived request for adminship that did not proceed beyond the discussion phase.
affirmatively assent. Since that wasn't in the RFC, and would open up the possibility of delaying the RFA !voting opening without intending it to, perhaps we should just keep it as auto open. I also don't personally see a stigma with the word withdraw. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 22:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This is not the page to nominate yourself or another editor to be an administrator. To do so, please follow these instructions. |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: ( successful, unsuccessful) |
Candidate | Type | Result | Date of close | Tally | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | O | N | % | ||||
Sdkb | RfA | Successful | 16 Feb 2024 | 265 | 2 | 0 | 99 |
The Night Watch | RfA | Successful | 11 Feb 2024 | 215 | 63 | 13 | 77 |
Red-tailed hawk | RfA | Successful | 5 Jan 2024 | 207 | 6 | 8 | 97 |
Robertsky | RfA | Successful | 3 Jan 2024 | 196 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
Interstellarity | RfA | Withdrawn by candidate | 2 Jan 2024 | 5 | 18 | 2 | 22 |
Tails Wx | RfA | Withdrawn by candidate | 29 Dec 2023 | 143 | 35 | 10 | 80 |
|
Hello everyone. I just wanted to make a note and say that I am very thankful to every single person who has seen my work, supported, guided, and helped me over the last 13 years since I have been here on Wikipedia. I have learned a lot here, but there is still a lot to learn and experience here on Wikipedia as an editor. Wikipedia has given me tremendous knowledge, and I will always be there to serve Wikipedia as an administrator till the end of time and till my last breath. I will run for RfA one day when I am ready. Thank you. TheGeneralUser ( talk) 23:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Per
Proposal 3B of 2024 RFA Review that was recently closed as successful, the first 2 days will be discussion-only for the next five RfAs that are not closed per WP:SNOW or WP:NOTNOW or to RfAs opened in the next six months – whichever happens first.
Soni (
talk) 06:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Cheers, Sdkb talk 18:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)In order to encourage editors to run, I'd like to see this implemented in a way that allows those who sense that the !voting phase may not go as well as they'd hoped to bow out gracefully after the discussion phase with as little stigma attached as possible. One way to get at that would be to require candidates to affirmatively assent to proceed to the !voting phase as the discussion phase nears its end; if they do not, the default course of action would be to end the RfA with a neutral (not red) background and a note like
This is an archived request for adminship that did not proceed beyond the discussion phase.
affirmatively assent. Since that wasn't in the RFC, and would open up the possibility of delaying the RFA !voting opening without intending it to, perhaps we should just keep it as auto open. I also don't personally see a stigma with the word withdraw. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 22:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)