![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 100 | ← | Archive 105 | Archive 106 | Archive 107 | Archive 108 | Archive 109 | Archive 110 |
Hi Ritchie, Thank you very much for your support. We first created the Wikipedia page on 6th of Jan. 2020. Then we received the message regarding the copyright infringement from Wikipedia.*
https://www.poetryinternational.org/pi/site/poet/item/13889/31/Wakako-Kaku
We immediately deleted the section.
After this, we received another message from Wikipedia saying
"This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement."
https://wikitia.com/index.php?title=Wakako_Kaku&mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop This page appears to be a direct copy from
It seems that this wikitia site was created after we uploaded our first text on July 6th.
Everything in our current contents is written by us in our original words and we would like to know what we should do to complete this process. I have restored the article to Draft:Wakako_Kaku .
We appreciate your support on this matter.
Castor KakuWakako ( talk) @ 10: 04:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
On 22 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Terry Jones, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 14:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, the IP that Alex Neman currently used is doing some edits again, although they aren't related to the previous Suzuki Carry problem. Is this counted as a block evasion? 125.160.113.5 ( talk) 15:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
*sigh* Right, Alex Neman blocked indef, reason changed to sockpuppetry, IP blocked for 72 hours. Any further problems, feel free to start a case at WP:SPI. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:18, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
I am not sure that PROD refund forbids CSD here for what is a clear A7. Sorry, but that was a weird decline that makes no sense to me, especially since a non-creator of the article that refunds can't know what was the content of the article before it was deleted. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 18:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
You declined with summary "appears to have survived an AfD", but as far as I can tell, the deletion never went beyond template. See [2]. So....? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Pauley Parrette came on ON TWITTER [1], the source was sited in one of the edits. Please tell me why there is a blatant disrespect for the asexual community by not including this in her Wikipedia page? We, as a community, need awareness, and I'm severely disappointed that this information was not kept on the page.
"Ace" is short for "asexual", and is a term that the asexual community uses to self identify. No one in the asexual community thinks this is too ambiguous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faeriefate ( talk • contribs) 02:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
No one in the asexual community thinks this is too ambiguousBut what about those outside the asexual community (who comprise the vast majority of the population)? Adam9007 ( talk) 02:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Hey, There's a lot of POV pushers in this discussion, can you consider extending the page protection? - FlightTime Phone ( open channel) 18:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
Hello, Ritchie333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Linda Metcalf".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo ( talk) 22:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
You know something you'll never know is the number of times I just scream, I scream I do when I make changes and then some dullard with their titles (like you do, I mean what does admin mean really? IRL you;re just someone who indentures themselves to do freework so multimillionaire Jimbo can take their hols in Davos), comes along and suddenly have a real need to change it. But never before.
NEVER BEFORE! Funny that. Like it's almost they didn;t see it. But when it happens, BOOM! Like an OCD twitcher with too much caffeine they have to meddle.
6,000,000 articles. GTFOH! Something like 75% of fresh edits is added content by IPs. The rest of you are just keepers of the seal. Protecting their little truth, lie or opinion.
BTW the technical term is a toponym not a name. But that went over your head. 81.147.178.48 ( talk) 21:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Who tours and performances, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kilburn ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
As you are aware, I've reverted your turning of a perfectly valid article into a redirect. It is most emphatically not a "duplicate of Ashford International railway station". That article is about the SER's original station, and its subsequent history. Ashford West was the LCDR's original station. Closed to passengers after the two companies agreed to work together as the SE&CR. Mjroots ( talk) 20:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, you reverted a section I deleted from London Victoria station - querying 'who did this'? My edit summary makes that clear - "Much reduced section on DLR, given there are no current/potential plans for this."
As part of my edit, I searched for any recent updates regarding DLR to Victoria. The Mayor's Transport Strategy has nothing in it regarding future DLR extensions west - whether to Victoria or otherwise. The Horizon 2050 document only mentions the potential of closing Tower Gateway, nothing more.
All citations were at least 8 years old and referred to previous proposals. I can massively cut it down if you'd prefer? Seems silly to 'encourage' that idea that a DLR extension could be coming to Victoria, when there's nothing on the horizon/planned.
I'd appreciate a look at the other changes I made, too. :)
Looking forward to hearing from you, Turini2 ( talk) 16:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC) :)
The Thank You Barnstar | ||
For reaching out to me and helping me to get unblocked. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 19:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC) |
On 28 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Nicholas Parsons, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 20:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Details of the different Led zep songs having plagiarism scandals are here and it shows it's songs from different albums, that's why I placed these albums in the category before you cancelled my edit:
/info/en/?search=List_of_songs_subject_to_plagiarism_disputes
″″″″ JulienSorel1965 ( talk) 23:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Dear Ritchie333, first of all this article has no Notability issue. there is a reference of times of India. also it is clearly proved that this person Agnel Roman is known music composer in Indian film industry. also the last version of this article was different from the deleted version so it is not WP:G4 either. so now with all the respect towards admins and the Wikipedia community i am, asking you that pleas make this article live and guide me future.
Annki777 ( talk) 16:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
If I wanted to listen to bells, I'd stick this on. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:28, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello!
I just wanted to reach out because I noticed you ended up deleting the Rachel Rossi page I created. It was first tagged for deletion and you were able to edit and fix. Thank you so much for that! However, it was then tagged again for speedy deletion because of the amount of content. I was in the process of doing my research and getting more information with sources that could verify the information. However, the page has now been fully deleted. Is there anything I can do at this point? It was my first page I created. I am still very new here and I hope I can still salvage the article. Thanks so much! Have a wonderful day either way and thanks so much for helping me fix my initial faults the first time around!
Braven562 ( talk) 01:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie,
This refers to an AfD a month ago, which is not helpful for querying your in-depth thoughts, but I was wondering about it. Your base consideration of NC seems correct. However, from there, did you consider WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE, which as the subject was requesting deletion, would have an NC default to delete. I'm aware that that particular bit of BLP policy has so many caveats that you certainly could reject it, but I was interested in whether you did or, if not, what your thoughts are about its applicability now?
Cheers, Nosebagbear ( talk) 19:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
{{subst:Afd top|The result was '''no consensus''' due to User:Levivich not agreeing.}} ~~~~
–
Leviv
ich
05:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Though I get why you made this edit, there's a bit of an irony that you asked if the editor was an arbitration committee clerk. Technically since there was no urgency to make the revert (as you restored a typo on what was supposed to be a closing </s> tag, arguably there's a better ignore-all-rules case for that one portion of the original edit than yours), you too should have notified a clerk and let them proceed... (The other changes were indeed pointless.) I don't think anyone other than perhaps the original editor will mind; your edit summary was just a bit disconcerting given the context. isaacl ( talk) 23:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Dear :@ Ritchie333:, pls help me to send this article for review. it looks ok to you ?? pls help me.
Annki777 ( talk) 71:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Ritchie333: alright buddy, i appreciate your help thanks :)
Annki777 ( talk) 23:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
On 1 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Church of the Cosmic Skull, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Church of the Cosmic Skull released a single to celebrate a solar eclipse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Church of the Cosmic Skull. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Church of the Cosmic Skull), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Wug· a·po·des 06:58, 31 January 2020 (UTC) 12:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie. Would you mind applying your revdel magic wand to this edit, probably under RD2. Even though it's not a BLP, it's clearly overtly offensive?
Thanks. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 07:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon is planned for March 2020, a contest/editathon to eliminate as many stubs as possible from all 134 counties. Amazon vouchers/book prizes are planned for most articles destubbed from England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and Northern Ireland and whoever destubs articles from the most counties out of the 134. Sign up on page if interested in participating, hope this will prove to be good fun and productive, we have over 44,000 stubs! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Rich. Are you OK, you haven't seemed yourself last six months or so. I thought we'd lost you as a contributor for a while and you're one of our most valuable editors on London topics!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie. I'm really hesitant to dispute an AFD close, and it's not something I'd normally do, but I wonder if you'd consider taking another look at this one.
Your close justification was that Consensus is the work done by Lightburst has shown the article can be improved and should be retained
however I don't really see any such consensus in the discussion.
Lightburst !voted first, stating that he'd (re-)added some sources. I then !voted, giving what I think is a fairly thorough breakdown of why those sources are insufficient. The original nominator concurred, and said they had made the same assessment. There were two further !votes, neither of which addressed either my or Lighbursts comments: the first was essentially an explicit 'ignore policy, use common sense' argument which I hope would not factor too heavily into the closing, and the second appeared to put forward a different argument which was that given the name changes, more sources could be found, though no actual sources were provided.
As I see it, there's still no consensus either way and my delete argument remains unrefuted, so another week of discussion with some additional contributions could have made this clearer. I'd also add that all three of the keep !voters are members of the WP:ARS with a history of voting as a block so, while that of course doesn't discount their votes, it does (in my mind) add to an argument for relisting in the hope of getting some comments from a slightly broader range of AFD participants.
Anyway, let me know your thoughts and whether you'd consider re-opening and re-listing this. Hug syrup 09:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
...there is some difficulty in justifiably assigning to it the fourth of the epithets you applied to the statement inasmuch as the precise correlation between the information you communicated and the facts insofar as they can be determined and demonstrated is such as to cause epistemological problems of sufficient magnitude as to lay upon the logical and semantic resources of the English language a heavier burden than they can reasonably be expected to bear.
The Patent Scaffolding Company was founded in New York City in 1909 by consolidating the construction equipment firms of Pitou, Beinecke and Davidson. That year, Patent Scaffolding introduced a new heavy-duty scaffolding system that represented a significant advancement for building construction safety. In the 1920s the company was among the pioneers in producing lightweight tubular steel scaffolding in the United States...
Hi Ritchie – I just noticed on my watchlist your reversion of an IP on the above, regarding the composition of "LONDON S.R." from 1970, and realised that when I wrote that bit I introduced an error which the IP has corrected. LONDON S.R. consisted of the stations listed in the sentence following it, and of course (as I've just remembered!) Charing Cross and Victoria are not south of the Thames. What I think I meant to write was something like "south of central London". I will have to check tonight what exactly was written in the Feb 2011 TTS Journal; I can check some old BR Fares Manuals from that era as well to see how they describe it. Sorry for introducing that error some time ago! I'll edit to fix it later this evening. Cheers, Hassocks 5489 (Floreat Hova!) 15:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
WP:CSK explicitly states that deletion discussions may be tagged with that template, providing there were no other substantive comments up to that point. Modernponderer ( talk) 16:43, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Long time no talk. I hope you are doing well.
I am currently working on something. For that I am looking for verifiable incidents, in which incorrect information from Wikipedia (preferably enwiki) was circulated as fact, either on Internet or off the internet. A few weeks ago I read a mainspace article listing a few incidents like this. But now I cant find that article. Howerver, I came across
Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Less than one year among few others. I am looking for incidents similar to one mentioned on
Reliability of Wikipedia:
A South American coati. In July 2008, a 17-year-old student added an invented nickname to the Wikipedia article coati as a private joke, saying that coatis were also known as "Brazilian aardvarks". The false information lasted for six years in Wikipedia and came to be propagated by hundreds of websites, several newspapers ( one of which was later cited as a source in Wikipedia), and even books published by a few university presses. [1] [2]
I am not asking for a a lot of search/work, just somewhere on enwiki where I can find such information (any namespace). Also, I am not looking for "circular referencing" either.
Comments/help from anybody, and everybody is welcome. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) 21:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
References
User globally locked Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello! Your submission of
A1206 road (Great Britain) at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
22:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
On 6 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mollie Hughes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mollie Hughes is the youngest woman to ski solo to the South Pole? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mollie Hughes. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Mollie Hughes), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Probably not, but he's related to this bunch of socks plugging his self-published book. Unfortunately {{ db-g11}} doesn't give scope for pointing out the self-promotional pointers left lying all around. Sitting through 6 minutes of YouTube self promotion to find the source of File:BulsaraRainforestReading.gif may have stripped any residual doubt from my view. Cabayi ( talk) 18:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted my WP:U5 template on User:Batstreet Boyz/sandbox with the edit summary, "decline speedy, the polar opposite of a U5".
Please explain: what is it about a fake article on a fictional TV programme stated to be made in a fictional country 50 years in the future, as an editor's sole edit, that is the opposite of U5?
I re-tagged the page with {{ db-hoax}}, but Fastily then deleted it as U5 after all, so I'm confused. – Fayenatic London 20:46, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Lukas is an Atlasian animated comedy/drama that premiered on Fox TV on September 18, 2068; was the fact that it was about a non-existent country and dated 50 years in the future not a giveaway that this was unlikely to be true?) ‑ Iridescent 13:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
You recently deleted the article Adewale Aladejana on the basis of been recreated, I want you to know that there is a lot of improvement on the article from the previously deleted one and the article has a lot of qualified sources which shows notability. The article was recreated with improvement and modification from the previously deleted one and as such should not be deleted on that basis. And if I did something else wrong, I would love to know how to correct it and get your advice on what to do to create the article again. Kojomo ( talk) 14:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. User @Krish990 is edit warring Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke television series since a long time stating Kaveri Priyam and Rithvik Arora also as main leads along with Shaheer Sheikh and Rhea Sharma while they originally play pivotal role as stated by many reliable sources while the sources he uses to prove his point are non reliable ones. Despite discussing in talk page Talk:Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke with reliable sources as a proof for it, he is just editing back again and again, being stubborn in his point itself stating the former two also as lead of the series. Despite him being blocked for some time by you earlier, it again continues. Could you help in this matter? Noobie anonymous ( talk) 13:17, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know - I took TFFfan at face value as a new user. I'm not sure what Women in Red is and I'm still undecided as to whether I'd have time to properly carry out admin duties, so please don't rush into any nomination. Katharineamy ( talk) 16:54, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Just wanted to point out that it appears DGG reverted your closing of the Mindless Ones AFD, which resulted in a bot restoring the AFD template to the page. I'm not sure if there was a reason for this that I'm missing (hence why I've pinged DGG in case he has an explanation) but I wanted to bring it to your attention... — Hunter Kahn 04:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello Ritchie333,
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, you have closed the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AA20 (2020 film). The film passes notablity. We shall have to create a page in future. So can you please recover the page as a draft. I intend to work on it. Saichaitanya4496 ( talk) 02:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie I seem to have accidentally duplicated an article. Le Concert d’Astrée was a redirect to Emmanuelle Haïm until a few days ago, when I removed the redirect and wrote a new article. The trouble is it shows twice in my watchlist, once with no talk page and language links, and once with. Should I put one version up for deletion? I’m not quite sure how this happened (I’ve never ended a redirect before) so if I’ve done something troutworthy please let me know. Many thanks Mccapra ( talk) 07:47, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 100 | ← | Archive 105 | Archive 106 | Archive 107 | Archive 108 | Archive 109 | Archive 110 |
Hi Ritchie, Thank you very much for your support. We first created the Wikipedia page on 6th of Jan. 2020. Then we received the message regarding the copyright infringement from Wikipedia.*
https://www.poetryinternational.org/pi/site/poet/item/13889/31/Wakako-Kaku
We immediately deleted the section.
After this, we received another message from Wikipedia saying
"This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement."
https://wikitia.com/index.php?title=Wakako_Kaku&mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop This page appears to be a direct copy from
It seems that this wikitia site was created after we uploaded our first text on July 6th.
Everything in our current contents is written by us in our original words and we would like to know what we should do to complete this process. I have restored the article to Draft:Wakako_Kaku .
We appreciate your support on this matter.
Castor KakuWakako ( talk) @ 10: 04:03, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
On 22 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Terry Jones, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 14:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, the IP that Alex Neman currently used is doing some edits again, although they aren't related to the previous Suzuki Carry problem. Is this counted as a block evasion? 125.160.113.5 ( talk) 15:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
*sigh* Right, Alex Neman blocked indef, reason changed to sockpuppetry, IP blocked for 72 hours. Any further problems, feel free to start a case at WP:SPI. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:18, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
I am not sure that PROD refund forbids CSD here for what is a clear A7. Sorry, but that was a weird decline that makes no sense to me, especially since a non-creator of the article that refunds can't know what was the content of the article before it was deleted. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 18:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
You declined with summary "appears to have survived an AfD", but as far as I can tell, the deletion never went beyond template. See [2]. So....? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Pauley Parrette came on ON TWITTER [1], the source was sited in one of the edits. Please tell me why there is a blatant disrespect for the asexual community by not including this in her Wikipedia page? We, as a community, need awareness, and I'm severely disappointed that this information was not kept on the page.
"Ace" is short for "asexual", and is a term that the asexual community uses to self identify. No one in the asexual community thinks this is too ambiguous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faeriefate ( talk • contribs) 02:05, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
No one in the asexual community thinks this is too ambiguousBut what about those outside the asexual community (who comprise the vast majority of the population)? Adam9007 ( talk) 02:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Hey, There's a lot of POV pushers in this discussion, can you consider extending the page protection? - FlightTime Phone ( open channel) 18:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check date values in: |accessdate=
(
help); Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
Hello, Ritchie333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Linda Metcalf".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo ( talk) 22:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
You know something you'll never know is the number of times I just scream, I scream I do when I make changes and then some dullard with their titles (like you do, I mean what does admin mean really? IRL you;re just someone who indentures themselves to do freework so multimillionaire Jimbo can take their hols in Davos), comes along and suddenly have a real need to change it. But never before.
NEVER BEFORE! Funny that. Like it's almost they didn;t see it. But when it happens, BOOM! Like an OCD twitcher with too much caffeine they have to meddle.
6,000,000 articles. GTFOH! Something like 75% of fresh edits is added content by IPs. The rest of you are just keepers of the seal. Protecting their little truth, lie or opinion.
BTW the technical term is a toponym not a name. But that went over your head. 81.147.178.48 ( talk) 21:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Who tours and performances, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kilburn ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
As you are aware, I've reverted your turning of a perfectly valid article into a redirect. It is most emphatically not a "duplicate of Ashford International railway station". That article is about the SER's original station, and its subsequent history. Ashford West was the LCDR's original station. Closed to passengers after the two companies agreed to work together as the SE&CR. Mjroots ( talk) 20:30, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello, you reverted a section I deleted from London Victoria station - querying 'who did this'? My edit summary makes that clear - "Much reduced section on DLR, given there are no current/potential plans for this."
As part of my edit, I searched for any recent updates regarding DLR to Victoria. The Mayor's Transport Strategy has nothing in it regarding future DLR extensions west - whether to Victoria or otherwise. The Horizon 2050 document only mentions the potential of closing Tower Gateway, nothing more.
All citations were at least 8 years old and referred to previous proposals. I can massively cut it down if you'd prefer? Seems silly to 'encourage' that idea that a DLR extension could be coming to Victoria, when there's nothing on the horizon/planned.
I'd appreciate a look at the other changes I made, too. :)
Looking forward to hearing from you, Turini2 ( talk) 16:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC) :)
The Thank You Barnstar | ||
For reaching out to me and helping me to get unblocked. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 19:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC) |
On 28 January 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Nicholas Parsons, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 20:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Details of the different Led zep songs having plagiarism scandals are here and it shows it's songs from different albums, that's why I placed these albums in the category before you cancelled my edit:
/info/en/?search=List_of_songs_subject_to_plagiarism_disputes
″″″″ JulienSorel1965 ( talk) 23:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Dear Ritchie333, first of all this article has no Notability issue. there is a reference of times of India. also it is clearly proved that this person Agnel Roman is known music composer in Indian film industry. also the last version of this article was different from the deleted version so it is not WP:G4 either. so now with all the respect towards admins and the Wikipedia community i am, asking you that pleas make this article live and guide me future.
Annki777 ( talk) 16:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
If I wanted to listen to bells, I'd stick this on. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:28, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello!
I just wanted to reach out because I noticed you ended up deleting the Rachel Rossi page I created. It was first tagged for deletion and you were able to edit and fix. Thank you so much for that! However, it was then tagged again for speedy deletion because of the amount of content. I was in the process of doing my research and getting more information with sources that could verify the information. However, the page has now been fully deleted. Is there anything I can do at this point? It was my first page I created. I am still very new here and I hope I can still salvage the article. Thanks so much! Have a wonderful day either way and thanks so much for helping me fix my initial faults the first time around!
Braven562 ( talk) 01:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie,
This refers to an AfD a month ago, which is not helpful for querying your in-depth thoughts, but I was wondering about it. Your base consideration of NC seems correct. However, from there, did you consider WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE, which as the subject was requesting deletion, would have an NC default to delete. I'm aware that that particular bit of BLP policy has so many caveats that you certainly could reject it, but I was interested in whether you did or, if not, what your thoughts are about its applicability now?
Cheers, Nosebagbear ( talk) 19:48, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
{{subst:Afd top|The result was '''no consensus''' due to User:Levivich not agreeing.}} ~~~~
–
Leviv
ich
05:47, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Though I get why you made this edit, there's a bit of an irony that you asked if the editor was an arbitration committee clerk. Technically since there was no urgency to make the revert (as you restored a typo on what was supposed to be a closing </s> tag, arguably there's a better ignore-all-rules case for that one portion of the original edit than yours), you too should have notified a clerk and let them proceed... (The other changes were indeed pointless.) I don't think anyone other than perhaps the original editor will mind; your edit summary was just a bit disconcerting given the context. isaacl ( talk) 23:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Dear :@ Ritchie333:, pls help me to send this article for review. it looks ok to you ?? pls help me.
Annki777 ( talk) 71:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
@ Ritchie333: alright buddy, i appreciate your help thanks :)
Annki777 ( talk) 23:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
On 1 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Church of the Cosmic Skull, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Church of the Cosmic Skull released a single to celebrate a solar eclipse? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Church of the Cosmic Skull. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Church of the Cosmic Skull), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Wug· a·po·des 06:58, 31 January 2020 (UTC) 12:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie. Would you mind applying your revdel magic wand to this edit, probably under RD2. Even though it's not a BLP, it's clearly overtly offensive?
Thanks. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 07:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. The Wikipedia:The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon is planned for March 2020, a contest/editathon to eliminate as many stubs as possible from all 134 counties. Amazon vouchers/book prizes are planned for most articles destubbed from England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and Northern Ireland and whoever destubs articles from the most counties out of the 134. Sign up on page if interested in participating, hope this will prove to be good fun and productive, we have over 44,000 stubs! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Rich. Are you OK, you haven't seemed yourself last six months or so. I thought we'd lost you as a contributor for a while and you're one of our most valuable editors on London topics!♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie. I'm really hesitant to dispute an AFD close, and it's not something I'd normally do, but I wonder if you'd consider taking another look at this one.
Your close justification was that Consensus is the work done by Lightburst has shown the article can be improved and should be retained
however I don't really see any such consensus in the discussion.
Lightburst !voted first, stating that he'd (re-)added some sources. I then !voted, giving what I think is a fairly thorough breakdown of why those sources are insufficient. The original nominator concurred, and said they had made the same assessment. There were two further !votes, neither of which addressed either my or Lighbursts comments: the first was essentially an explicit 'ignore policy, use common sense' argument which I hope would not factor too heavily into the closing, and the second appeared to put forward a different argument which was that given the name changes, more sources could be found, though no actual sources were provided.
As I see it, there's still no consensus either way and my delete argument remains unrefuted, so another week of discussion with some additional contributions could have made this clearer. I'd also add that all three of the keep !voters are members of the WP:ARS with a history of voting as a block so, while that of course doesn't discount their votes, it does (in my mind) add to an argument for relisting in the hope of getting some comments from a slightly broader range of AFD participants.
Anyway, let me know your thoughts and whether you'd consider re-opening and re-listing this. Hug syrup 09:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
...there is some difficulty in justifiably assigning to it the fourth of the epithets you applied to the statement inasmuch as the precise correlation between the information you communicated and the facts insofar as they can be determined and demonstrated is such as to cause epistemological problems of sufficient magnitude as to lay upon the logical and semantic resources of the English language a heavier burden than they can reasonably be expected to bear.
The Patent Scaffolding Company was founded in New York City in 1909 by consolidating the construction equipment firms of Pitou, Beinecke and Davidson. That year, Patent Scaffolding introduced a new heavy-duty scaffolding system that represented a significant advancement for building construction safety. In the 1920s the company was among the pioneers in producing lightweight tubular steel scaffolding in the United States...
Hi Ritchie – I just noticed on my watchlist your reversion of an IP on the above, regarding the composition of "LONDON S.R." from 1970, and realised that when I wrote that bit I introduced an error which the IP has corrected. LONDON S.R. consisted of the stations listed in the sentence following it, and of course (as I've just remembered!) Charing Cross and Victoria are not south of the Thames. What I think I meant to write was something like "south of central London". I will have to check tonight what exactly was written in the Feb 2011 TTS Journal; I can check some old BR Fares Manuals from that era as well to see how they describe it. Sorry for introducing that error some time ago! I'll edit to fix it later this evening. Cheers, Hassocks 5489 (Floreat Hova!) 15:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
WP:CSK explicitly states that deletion discussions may be tagged with that template, providing there were no other substantive comments up to that point. Modernponderer ( talk) 16:43, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Long time no talk. I hope you are doing well.
I am currently working on something. For that I am looking for verifiable incidents, in which incorrect information from Wikipedia (preferably enwiki) was circulated as fact, either on Internet or off the internet. A few weeks ago I read a mainspace article listing a few incidents like this. But now I cant find that article. Howerver, I came across
Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Less than one year among few others. I am looking for incidents similar to one mentioned on
Reliability of Wikipedia:
A South American coati. In July 2008, a 17-year-old student added an invented nickname to the Wikipedia article coati as a private joke, saying that coatis were also known as "Brazilian aardvarks". The false information lasted for six years in Wikipedia and came to be propagated by hundreds of websites, several newspapers ( one of which was later cited as a source in Wikipedia), and even books published by a few university presses. [1] [2]
I am not asking for a a lot of search/work, just somewhere on enwiki where I can find such information (any namespace). Also, I am not looking for "circular referencing" either.
Comments/help from anybody, and everybody is welcome. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) 21:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
References
User globally locked Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello! Your submission of
A1206 road (Great Britain) at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk)
22:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
On 6 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mollie Hughes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mollie Hughes is the youngest woman to ski solo to the South Pole? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mollie Hughes. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Mollie Hughes), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Probably not, but he's related to this bunch of socks plugging his self-published book. Unfortunately {{ db-g11}} doesn't give scope for pointing out the self-promotional pointers left lying all around. Sitting through 6 minutes of YouTube self promotion to find the source of File:BulsaraRainforestReading.gif may have stripped any residual doubt from my view. Cabayi ( talk) 18:31, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted my WP:U5 template on User:Batstreet Boyz/sandbox with the edit summary, "decline speedy, the polar opposite of a U5".
Please explain: what is it about a fake article on a fictional TV programme stated to be made in a fictional country 50 years in the future, as an editor's sole edit, that is the opposite of U5?
I re-tagged the page with {{ db-hoax}}, but Fastily then deleted it as U5 after all, so I'm confused. – Fayenatic London 20:46, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Lukas is an Atlasian animated comedy/drama that premiered on Fox TV on September 18, 2068; was the fact that it was about a non-existent country and dated 50 years in the future not a giveaway that this was unlikely to be true?) ‑ Iridescent 13:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
You recently deleted the article Adewale Aladejana on the basis of been recreated, I want you to know that there is a lot of improvement on the article from the previously deleted one and the article has a lot of qualified sources which shows notability. The article was recreated with improvement and modification from the previously deleted one and as such should not be deleted on that basis. And if I did something else wrong, I would love to know how to correct it and get your advice on what to do to create the article again. Kojomo ( talk) 14:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi. User @Krish990 is edit warring Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke television series since a long time stating Kaveri Priyam and Rithvik Arora also as main leads along with Shaheer Sheikh and Rhea Sharma while they originally play pivotal role as stated by many reliable sources while the sources he uses to prove his point are non reliable ones. Despite discussing in talk page Talk:Yeh Rishtey Hain Pyaar Ke with reliable sources as a proof for it, he is just editing back again and again, being stubborn in his point itself stating the former two also as lead of the series. Despite him being blocked for some time by you earlier, it again continues. Could you help in this matter? Noobie anonymous ( talk) 13:17, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know - I took TFFfan at face value as a new user. I'm not sure what Women in Red is and I'm still undecided as to whether I'd have time to properly carry out admin duties, so please don't rush into any nomination. Katharineamy ( talk) 16:54, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Just wanted to point out that it appears DGG reverted your closing of the Mindless Ones AFD, which resulted in a bot restoring the AFD template to the page. I'm not sure if there was a reason for this that I'm missing (hence why I've pinged DGG in case he has an explanation) but I wanted to bring it to your attention... — Hunter Kahn 04:37, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello Ritchie333,
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie, you have closed the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AA20 (2020 film). The film passes notablity. We shall have to create a page in future. So can you please recover the page as a draft. I intend to work on it. Saichaitanya4496 ( talk) 02:54, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie I seem to have accidentally duplicated an article. Le Concert d’Astrée was a redirect to Emmanuelle Haïm until a few days ago, when I removed the redirect and wrote a new article. The trouble is it shows twice in my watchlist, once with no talk page and language links, and once with. Should I put one version up for deletion? I’m not quite sure how this happened (I’ve never ended a redirect before) so if I’ve done something troutworthy please let me know. Many thanks Mccapra ( talk) 07:47, 14 February 2020 (UTC)