This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
The No Spam Barnstar | |
Great job catching that sock farm you mentioned on AN/I and your willingness to clean up their actions. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 16:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC) |
I thought I should let you know that I closed the ANI Discussion regarding that sockpuppet you found. I'm not an admin, but it was turning into a snowy situation. The consensus seemed to be ban and nuke 'em. Of course, since I'm not an admin, an admin can revert my closing it if they have good reason, so watch for that. -- Gestrid ( talk) 05:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Block user:Sun 01010101 2602:306:3357:BA0:6044:E986:57BE:CEB5 ( talk) 16:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I don't think the edit summary you just deleted at AIV needs to be rev-deleted; it was just simple profanity. Note that the policy says: "Especially, RevisionDelete does not exist to remove "ordinary" offensive comments and incivility". Regards, -- Jakob ( talk) aka Jakec 16:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello Mkdw, My name is Stephanie Barker and I am a student at the University of Colorado Boulder. I am currently enrolled in a Digital Anthropology class, which attempts to answer how the digital world affects culture and how culture affects the digital world. For my final project I am doing an ethnography on women Wikipedia users and as a member of the WikiProject Women page I was hoping I could ask you some questions about your experiences editing Wikipedia pages. 1. Have you ever been locked into an intense editing war? If yes, please explain the situation to me. 2. How did you become interested in editing Wikipedia pages and did you have any initial fears/hesitations when you started editing pages? 3. Have you ever been a victim of a mass deletion or other vandalism on Wikipedia? If yes, please explain the situation to me. 4. How would you describe your gender? 5. Is there anything else you would like to share with me about your experiences as a Wikipedia editor? Thank you for taking the time to read this email. I would like you to know that I am only sharing my research with my professor and the other students in my class. If you would like me to send you a copy of my final project, I would be more than happy to! Sincerely, Stelba90 ( talk) 00:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
I commend you for your largeness of spirit in fixing all the things that needed improvement in the article's GAR, despite our sometimes pointed disagreements, and I'd like to thank you for your efforts, which were very timely as I was tied up with a few things IRL. Your changes were significant enough that I think that you deserve credit for the article's promotion as much as I do for initially expanding the article. I'm toying with submitting the article for an A-class review once I get access to the ship's biography and would like to add your name as co-nominator, whenever I do that, if you're agreeable.
I'd be happy to collaborate with you if you have any other ships that you'd like to work on; I'd even follow sfn formatting if it's already present ;-) Between us we seem to have access to quite a variety of sources and I think that it would be to Wiki's benefit if we can put our differences behind us.
I do have one question, though; I was just tidying up the article and was wondering why the photographs are cited? Clicking on them will bring up the source if a curious reader clicks through to Commons, so they seem rather redundant to me.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 23:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Image captions should be referenced as appropriate just like any other part of the article." As such, I've always defaulted in doing so, mostly to negate that argument, in case it's ever brought up during a nomination again. Mkdw talk 16:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, it's me again. It seems like I didn't explain my question well. What I meant is to add information that I was still at school at my user page. I saw several user pages and they use some kind of a settings that shows important messages that write: "This user is still at school" Can you help to show me how to make those messages like that? I appreciated your help. DarryLaz ( talk) 15:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
A good deal of the time, my comment or !vote is opposed to SwisterTwister's and many I don't respond to at all (such as Crowdrise). There's nobody who can count on my agreement, because I look not at the suggestion, but directly at the article. I used to look at every AfD, but I no longer have the time for that, so I've decided to concentrate on avoiding no consensus because of insufficient participation closes. He is primarily notifying me of these. If you'd like to do that for the ones you run across, I'd appreciate the help. DGG ( talk ) 21:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, it's User:DarryLaz again. I just wanted to know that I really appreciated your help, but it seems like what I was looking for was not there. I'm trying to make the information similar to this user: User:Babymissfortune. Can I ask where and how I can make that kind of information? Sorry once again for your inconvenience. User:DarryLaz 114.125.169.195 ( talk) 06:33, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Kimberlymyrie posted on my talk page, apparently on a client's behalf, about what it would take to restore a certain deleted article. Since it was deleted as part of the Sunilseth sockfarm, I thought you might like to look into it. BethNaught ( talk) 21:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
...for protecting Superman again. I'm flabbergasted that after User:BaronBifford would make a change I specifically advised against and then claim "merging Tenebrae's and my content". I just don't know what to do anymore. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 22:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Though I firmly stand by my work, in the interests of convivial relations for the next month I will not make any edit on the Superman article without first running it past other editors. BaronBifford ( talk) 19:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
I created the article Kayla Day. After that sock @ Neebras: started mass creation of non-notable tennis player articles and he even edited the article created by me, which triggered the AFD. Now the article was userfied by you. I didn't want to move it to main space again as the AFd was just few weeks ago. If I would have moved it to main space then Fyunck(click) would have once again nominated it for deletion.
Now another user has created the article so soon after the AFD. I spent my time and energy on that article. I first created that article Kayla Day. She was covered in independent news websites. She was already a pro-player as I even gave link of her pro profile. She was not junior player when I created the article.
If Neebras would have stayed away, then my article would have survived as just after few days she played in US Open main draw. But when I created her article she already a professinal player with world ranking.-- Marvellous Spider -Man 06:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
As you see that Kayla Day was userfied in AFD.
Few weeks ago I created an article about a British teenager who has own many Muay Thai world championship and national championship competition.
As I am a new editor, I didn't know about this strict notabilitioes about wikiprojects.
A painter's article will be kept with zero reference. An eighteenth century military general's article will be kept with zero reference.
Dakota Ditcheva This article which I created was nominated for AFD. The editor who nominated it, didn't do follow the procedural formality of informing the page creator of a deletion discussion on my talk page.
I read these articles from WP:RS sources non sports websites BBC, mirror, elle uk. I didn't create the article without checking the details.
This is what I saw while creating the article. As she is world champion and national champion, that's why I created the article.
I tried to userfy this User:Marvellous Spider-Man/Dakota Ditcheva as I think the nominator is right about WP:NKICK but wrong about WP:GNG.
My page move was reverted, I don't want this to be deleted but userfied like Kayla Day AFD. There are some AFD regulars who don't do their own research while voting. Marvellous Spider -Man 17:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw. You userfied User:Rainbow Archer/Kayla Day based upon the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayla Day. About a week later, a different editor created Kayla Day. I'm not sure if WP:G4 applies here because apparently the player in question (according to User talk:Marvellous Spider-Man#User:Rainbow Archer/Kayla Day and this edit) accomplished something after the article was userfied that has made her notable per WP:NSPORT or Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines#Player. If she is now notable, then I'm wondering if a history merge is needed for the draft and the article and whether there should be some mention of the original AfD on the talk page of the article. Also, I'm not sure why a new article needed created when the draft could've just been moved to the article namespace. Could you take a peak at this when you have a spare moment or two? Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
OK, very thanks for your help. I also temporarily put link to my archive page in my talk. Regards. Dawid2009 ( talk) 16:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, do you can make a copyedit in Paper soccer ? I am not a native English spoeaker and it is difficult to me to correct it article better. I am an author of the sections of the strategies and XRSoccer. Main author of the gameplay on large playing area there was mainly Alhesoft. regards. Dawid2009 ( talk) 19:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lowell Goddard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Dominion Post. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
User:KGirlTrucker81 has asked for a deletion review of Tomas Gorny. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Cryptic 20:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw,
Some of the reports that I have made are a bit preemptive because of the long history of vandalism coming from them. When looking at the block logs, I see that the IP addresses have been blocked in the past, so I figure that they don't need as sufficient enough warnings... I've reported IP's to AIV on numerous occasions (in similar situations) where the IP's are indeed eventually blocked.
Actually, I find that a fair amount of admins block IP's shortly after they have vandalized, if they have a very long block record on them... not a critique on your part at all, but just an observation, that's all... 73.96.115.3 ( talk) 03:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
A good example is this. I see here that you and Paul Erik made the block at the same exact time, and the duration is significantly different. 73.96.115.3 ( talk) 03:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Mkdw. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review
the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators'
mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
First of all thank you for using my SkipPurge script. If you could please add a backlink besides it to User:VarunFEB2003/SkipPurge I'd be really really grateful. Thanks a lot! Varun FEB2003 15:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
You know that this is an alternate account to User:BadaBoom right? - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 03:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:OUP#Apply. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Your request has been approved. Please see the e-mail for more information. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Your access to Scholarships has been renewed, I'm Working on Journals it may take an additional 2 to 4 weeks. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 23:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Okay I found David Elmasllari (actor) on the new page feed, which it appears that David Elmasllari is a locked page, I'm not sure though if this is the same guy who has the page protection or not, so I figured I ask you. Wgolf ( talk) 20:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Martine van Hamel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 13:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
On 22 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Martine van Hamel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martine van Hamel won a gold medal at the 1966 Varna International Ballet Competition, one of the most prestigious dance competitions in the world? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Martine van Hamel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Martine van Hamel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Chris Woodrich ( talk)) 00:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
You issued some blocks for the sockpuppet investigation for TheErectile. His page tag was changed to an indef block without an indef block being given. Were you planning an indef block on him or should the tag be corrected?
Thanks -- Dane2007 talk 18:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Announcing two exciting online editathons |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 10:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event:
Best Wishes, Addis Wang
Sent by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
battle ship and ballerina
Thank you for quality articles such as HMS Curacoa (D41) and Hee Seo, for service over ten years beginning with topics around Vancouver, for your admin work and the courage to step in the arb ring, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Just a note on your extended statement—in my experience, there is usually a flood of noms and renoms in the last day or few hours. The discrepancy is usually just editors staking out the field. I wouldn't be concerned about too few nominations or at least I don't recall a precedent for such a concern coming to fruition. Regardless, thanks for volunteering to serve czar 19:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I am still somewhat new to posting and noticed the G.D. Crain page got deleted due to a lack of sources. I'm not sure if it's because it was "G.D. Crain" instead of the "G.D. Crain Jr" mentioned here or just lack of primary sources. The NY Times did an obituary on G.D. listed here: http://www.nytimes.com/1973/12/17/archives/gd-crain-jr-dies-at-88-published-advertising-age.html?_r=0 . As a result, I truly do believe that he's notable enough to be included on Wikipedia. What would I need to do to get his page reconsidered?
Pokeefe363 ( talk) 15:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins). MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw,
As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).
Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.
Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.
It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.
(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.
Hello, Mkdw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Two new topics for our online editathons |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Her user page article doesn't look bad. Can you explain her to move it to draft. She recreates her deleted userpage. -- Marvellous Spider-Man 13:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) ( user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Congratulations on your success in the elections and welcome to the 2017 Arbitration Committee. Please email arbcom-en-clists.wikimedia.org indicating which, if any, of the checkuser and oversight permissions you wish to be assigned for your term. Please also tell us what email address you would like to have subscribed to the Arbitration Committee mailing lists.
Over the coming days, you will receive a small number of emails. Please carefully read them. If they are registration emails, please follow any instructions in them to finalize registration. You can contact me or any other arbitrator directly if you have difficulty with the induction process.
Thank you for volunteering to serve on the committee. We very much look forward to introducing ourselves to you on the mailing list and to working with you this term.
For the Arbitration Committee,
GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Mkdw, I have granted you the CU and OS flag. You can subscribe to checkuser-l and contact an op for access to #wikimedia-checkuser and #wikimedia-privacy. Congratulations and regards, -- Menti fisto 06:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Go Phightins ! 00:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Mkdw: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America 1000 15:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13 Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))
Hello Mkdw: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, GAB gab 03:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Can you delete said article and close the AfD discussion for it? Thanks. Dr. Neurosis ( talk) 19:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Mkdw, Can you please take a look at this ticket we received regarding an article you deleted as G5. The customer claiming that the article was created by an unauthorised third party without subject's knowledge or consent and they want to repost the same article. Thank you – GSS ( talk) 16:41, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Women Philosophers &
Women in Education online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
This
edit request to
User:Mkdw has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2602:306:36D5:5690:281E:9B12:E1D3:372F ( talk) 03:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Mkdw,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (
talk)
23:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hello Mkdw, The customer of this ticket was requesting to remove the contents added by an IP address by citing a source in the Croatian language. A newly registered user already deleted the contents and I closed the ticket by replying the same but do you think that the revisions from 753058748 to 758427194 need to be deleted too if the claim is unverifiable? Thank you – GSS ( talk| c| em) 11:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Scott Santaniello ( talk · contribs) should not be tagged as a blocked proven sock per sock master Scottbourbon ( talk · contribs) not being blocked (just warned). Right? Just clarifying, and thanks for archiving. -- JustBerry ( talk) 21:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. You deleted Chris Santos (actor) per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waffen77. Could you check the recently created Chris Santos (Actor). Thanks, Tassedethe ( talk) 00:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi Mkdw/Archive 7, in August 2014 you criticized Temporary foreign worker program in Canada, an article I started earlier that year, saying on its talk-page that it was: ...exceptionally out of date, and also contain some information that at 'no point in time' has been correct. However, after boasting on the talkpage saying you were very familiar with Canadian immigration legislation, etc etc, all you contributed to the article itself was a big box at the top that said:
You did not elaborate on the talk page to explain what and how the article should be corrected.
Just wondering why you did not feel the need to help the development of this article? I would like a receive a talkback. Thank you in advance, Ottawahitech ( talk) 20:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me
I will note the articles are both exceptionally out of date, and also contain some information that at 'no point in time' has been correct.
Hi there. I am lead writer for the Signpost's "Arbitration Report" and am wondering if you would be interested in answering some interviews questions as a newly elected Arbitrator. The questions can be asked through email, unless answering them here would be a more suitable choice. GamerPro64 20:24, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
GamerPro64 03:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw/Archive 7 I a writing to you since you seem to be the lead editor at wiki project Vancouver. I don’t know if you are aware of the Miscellaneous Statutes (Housing Priority Initiatives) Amendment Act, an article which I started on 29 July 2016 , and which has miraculously escaped any deletion attempt, so far. It is about a topic (15% foreign tax on housing in Vancouver) which has countless economic and social implications to the city/province, to Canada, as well as other countries.
I have been working on this article on and off with some help and some obstruction from other editors. It is a very complex topic and I am totally swamped with other wiki-stuff and wanted to get help from other editors, so I have been adding wp:RSs to the talk-page in the hope that others will use them in the article.
Here is where I could use your help: An editor has been blanking the talk-page, thus preventing me and others from using these RSs for the development of the article/ and from posting any more RSs . Can you help? Ottawahitech ( talk) 15:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me
Hi! Gmaxwell responded to you on his talkpage. When you add that situation to the STOCKS, please explain what happened, I am quite curious. ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 21:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Black Women &
Women Anthropologists online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I've relisted an RfC that was run at WT:Admin in Sept. 2015. It is at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Concrete proposal 3 as there are a number of similar proposals going on at the same place. Better to keep them together. Smallbones( smalltalk) 04:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm not reticent about making a statement; I'm just not sure about where and when to post. I'd hate to jeopardize me "case" by getting zapped at the last minute for "unauthorized posting on an arbcom page".
But I tell you, I'm much more easy-going than I used to be. So, if I'm allowed to edit without a ban/restriction again, I shall do no more than plant seeds. If people disagree with my edits, I'll just go with the flow. -- Uncle Ed ( talk) 17:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
How can I vote for you in Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates?
Greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfair ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
I've been meaning to drop by since the election results were announced and say congrats. Thought this barnstar was more than deserved for all you have done here over the last 10+ years since we first bumped into one another. WJBscribe (talk) 20:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC) |
For some reason, I found myself thinking about this, and I see it's now 10 years to the day since my last comment on that page, so this seems a timely moment to say 'Hi'. With the benefit of hindsight, I think I was probably a little green myself to be giving editors advice back in Jan/Feb 2007 and there are a few points I would definitely argue with myself about these days ;-). The comment about % mainspace contributions makes me laugh given my dismal stats in that area these days. Still, glad you're still here in spite of some dubious early advice! WJBscribe (talk) 20:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to... Women's History Month worldwide online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hello Mkdw, Realitease just recreated Rich Kids of Instagram (UK series) and Emir Bahadir (developer) both articles were deleted by you as G5 under their original title Rich Kids of Instagram and Emir Bahadir and I'm unable to find the investigation page so can you please look at it. Thank you – GSS ( talk| c| em) 16:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to
Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) ---- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I'm not sure exactly what you meant, but I don't think it was "perfunctory".
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
19:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC).
Hi Mkdw. As an explanation for this fat finger (thumb) mistake, I offer this. Sorry about that! — DoRD ( talk) 09:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Anjhula_Mya_Singh_Bais that you deleted a moment ago has been recreated with the exact same contents by a sock. You should delete this article and make it creation protected. Thanks- Mar11 ( talk) 05:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Mar11: The issue here isn't about verifiable. You have found more than enough sources. I'm not asking for WP:BOMBARD but rather context about why this individual is notable. Please refer to WP:PERSON. Basically you have sources that support a simple statement that she's a model, actress, etc. Nothing in the draft actually talks substantively about why she is notable and thereby received coverage. What sets her apart? What is her credible claim to notability? I would have no idea why she's famous or accomplished based upon reading the draft. Mkdw talk 03:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to articles about women on Wikipedia. I thought I'd let you know about the women's football/soccer task force, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer (WOSO). If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks! |
Welcome to
Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 19:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
What you said at WT:HA was extraordinarily kind, and I really appreciate it. -- Tryptofish ( talk) 23:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Women in Red's June 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Martine van Hamel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System ( talk) 10:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Martine van Hamel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Martine van Hamel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System ( talk) 16:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Women in Red's July 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Might be worth noting the subject is propagating BS on Twitter themselves. There's quite a few more too... CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:32, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
I saw your comment about User IDs on the Linley discussion from last month, so I thought I'd give you some background. The UserID feature got turned on somewhere in January 2002 and all of the active editors then registered. It got turned on while I was asleep (I'm in an Australian timezone) which is why my userID was 100. (And yes, six hours had gone by but I still came in at #100). If Linley's number is 111 then they were clearly around at that time, but I don't think they were "a regular", else I would remember them. There were only about 30-40 people editing the entire site, so you could easily get to know everyone. (I'm still in touch with some of them).
When the admin role became available (about a month later, Feb or Mar of 2002) Jimbo promoted a block of about 15-20 of us to admin, and all those accounts retained their admin rights when we moved to MediaWiki in 2003. Except for some admin-stripping that occurred due to some fairly outrageous events in 2004 (which led to the creation of ArbCom), all of those accounts retained admin up until the "inactivity" desysop that occurred in (when was it... 2011? 2012?).
Anyway, random useless trivia, but you seemed interested in the ID values, so I thought I'd share. Regards Manning ( talk) 07:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
For still keeping your cool with all that delusional KD bullshit. Good job! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC) |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The inline citation was next to where it said she was from McKeesport, Pennsylvania but the infobox says Leesport, Pennsylvania which you say is corroborated by the IC. Fine, but then I find this edit [9]] of yours very curious. Why would someone from Leesport, which is approximately [10] 75 miles from Philadelphia qualify for a list of people from Pittsburgh metro area when that is over 260 miles [11] from Leesport. What's more fascinating, you added her to the McKeesport article with this edit [12] Can you see why this is confusing and can you double check the source. I do notice that you're the article creator. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
I re-added her to the Pittsburgh list and re-edited to her article to make it say she grew up in Pittsburgh. Here is another source [18] for it and I put it into her article.
FYI I have created well over 100 People from categories or Scientists, Writers, Sportspeople from categories. I just don't create those categories, I populate them too. Here is a Scientiss [19] and how about a Pennsylvania town article I created [20] just this week. Editors have come around to my talk page to thank me [21] for my categorizing work and Editor Alansohn may have steam coming out of his ears if you cared to mention my name to him due to my nominating at CFD People from categories he created. I've been very active at WP:CFD with nominating small community people from categories for merging. I've been doing People from editing for 5 years or more. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me! SunnyBoi ( talk) 08:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. I'd like to answer your series of questions to the parties, but doing so will eat into the word count I have mostly used up already. May I have permission not to count my answers to your questions toward word count? I will keep the total word count for all seven answers under 200 words if you can do that. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Women in Red is pleased to introduce... A new initiative for worldwide online coverage: 1day1woman | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 03:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Welcome to Women in Red's August 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --
Introducing... WiR's new initaitve: 1day1woman for worldwide online coverage Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC) |
Were you? Because if I missed meeting you that would really suck :( Legoktm ( talk) 22:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Women in Red's September 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
But I think this is Vote (X) for Change, a LTA. — fortuna velut luna 13:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
I really think I need to apologize to you personally for pressing so hard to get the Arthur Rubin request moved to an open case, since you are the Arb who seems to have drawn the short straw on it. I had no inking that TRM wasn't going to participate. In the future, before I take up a banner in that way, I guess I need to check with the principals to see if they're going to follow through. In any case, I do apologize.
I'm embarrassed, and don't know what to do now. I'm not a party to the case, and am fairly uninvolved except for commenting in the AN/I thread. Do I attempt to put together a neutral and dispassionate timeline of events and offer it as evidence? Is that allowable, or advisable? Or should I leave well enough alone? Your advice would be appreciated. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 22:48, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
I already posted it on AN on September 1, scroll up GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. sorry yes, I wanted to endorse. I must have not read the listing carefully. AsadUK200 ( talk) 17:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)AsadUK200
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
The No Spam Barnstar | |
Great job catching that sock farm you mentioned on AN/I and your willingness to clean up their actions. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 16:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC) |
I thought I should let you know that I closed the ANI Discussion regarding that sockpuppet you found. I'm not an admin, but it was turning into a snowy situation. The consensus seemed to be ban and nuke 'em. Of course, since I'm not an admin, an admin can revert my closing it if they have good reason, so watch for that. -- Gestrid ( talk) 05:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Block user:Sun 01010101 2602:306:3357:BA0:6044:E986:57BE:CEB5 ( talk) 16:43, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi. I don't think the edit summary you just deleted at AIV needs to be rev-deleted; it was just simple profanity. Note that the policy says: "Especially, RevisionDelete does not exist to remove "ordinary" offensive comments and incivility". Regards, -- Jakob ( talk) aka Jakec 16:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello Mkdw, My name is Stephanie Barker and I am a student at the University of Colorado Boulder. I am currently enrolled in a Digital Anthropology class, which attempts to answer how the digital world affects culture and how culture affects the digital world. For my final project I am doing an ethnography on women Wikipedia users and as a member of the WikiProject Women page I was hoping I could ask you some questions about your experiences editing Wikipedia pages. 1. Have you ever been locked into an intense editing war? If yes, please explain the situation to me. 2. How did you become interested in editing Wikipedia pages and did you have any initial fears/hesitations when you started editing pages? 3. Have you ever been a victim of a mass deletion or other vandalism on Wikipedia? If yes, please explain the situation to me. 4. How would you describe your gender? 5. Is there anything else you would like to share with me about your experiences as a Wikipedia editor? Thank you for taking the time to read this email. I would like you to know that I am only sharing my research with my professor and the other students in my class. If you would like me to send you a copy of my final project, I would be more than happy to! Sincerely, Stelba90 ( talk) 00:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
I commend you for your largeness of spirit in fixing all the things that needed improvement in the article's GAR, despite our sometimes pointed disagreements, and I'd like to thank you for your efforts, which were very timely as I was tied up with a few things IRL. Your changes were significant enough that I think that you deserve credit for the article's promotion as much as I do for initially expanding the article. I'm toying with submitting the article for an A-class review once I get access to the ship's biography and would like to add your name as co-nominator, whenever I do that, if you're agreeable.
I'd be happy to collaborate with you if you have any other ships that you'd like to work on; I'd even follow sfn formatting if it's already present ;-) Between us we seem to have access to quite a variety of sources and I think that it would be to Wiki's benefit if we can put our differences behind us.
I do have one question, though; I was just tidying up the article and was wondering why the photographs are cited? Clicking on them will bring up the source if a curious reader clicks through to Commons, so they seem rather redundant to me.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 23:04, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Image captions should be referenced as appropriate just like any other part of the article." As such, I've always defaulted in doing so, mostly to negate that argument, in case it's ever brought up during a nomination again. Mkdw talk 16:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, it's me again. It seems like I didn't explain my question well. What I meant is to add information that I was still at school at my user page. I saw several user pages and they use some kind of a settings that shows important messages that write: "This user is still at school" Can you help to show me how to make those messages like that? I appreciated your help. DarryLaz ( talk) 15:54, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
A good deal of the time, my comment or !vote is opposed to SwisterTwister's and many I don't respond to at all (such as Crowdrise). There's nobody who can count on my agreement, because I look not at the suggestion, but directly at the article. I used to look at every AfD, but I no longer have the time for that, so I've decided to concentrate on avoiding no consensus because of insufficient participation closes. He is primarily notifying me of these. If you'd like to do that for the ones you run across, I'd appreciate the help. DGG ( talk ) 21:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, it's User:DarryLaz again. I just wanted to know that I really appreciated your help, but it seems like what I was looking for was not there. I'm trying to make the information similar to this user: User:Babymissfortune. Can I ask where and how I can make that kind of information? Sorry once again for your inconvenience. User:DarryLaz 114.125.169.195 ( talk) 06:33, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
User:Kimberlymyrie posted on my talk page, apparently on a client's behalf, about what it would take to restore a certain deleted article. Since it was deleted as part of the Sunilseth sockfarm, I thought you might like to look into it. BethNaught ( talk) 21:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
...for protecting Superman again. I'm flabbergasted that after User:BaronBifford would make a change I specifically advised against and then claim "merging Tenebrae's and my content". I just don't know what to do anymore. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 22:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
Though I firmly stand by my work, in the interests of convivial relations for the next month I will not make any edit on the Superman article without first running it past other editors. BaronBifford ( talk) 19:49, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
I created the article Kayla Day. After that sock @ Neebras: started mass creation of non-notable tennis player articles and he even edited the article created by me, which triggered the AFD. Now the article was userfied by you. I didn't want to move it to main space again as the AFd was just few weeks ago. If I would have moved it to main space then Fyunck(click) would have once again nominated it for deletion.
Now another user has created the article so soon after the AFD. I spent my time and energy on that article. I first created that article Kayla Day. She was covered in independent news websites. She was already a pro-player as I even gave link of her pro profile. She was not junior player when I created the article.
If Neebras would have stayed away, then my article would have survived as just after few days she played in US Open main draw. But when I created her article she already a professinal player with world ranking.-- Marvellous Spider -Man 06:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
As you see that Kayla Day was userfied in AFD.
Few weeks ago I created an article about a British teenager who has own many Muay Thai world championship and national championship competition.
As I am a new editor, I didn't know about this strict notabilitioes about wikiprojects.
A painter's article will be kept with zero reference. An eighteenth century military general's article will be kept with zero reference.
Dakota Ditcheva This article which I created was nominated for AFD. The editor who nominated it, didn't do follow the procedural formality of informing the page creator of a deletion discussion on my talk page.
I read these articles from WP:RS sources non sports websites BBC, mirror, elle uk. I didn't create the article without checking the details.
This is what I saw while creating the article. As she is world champion and national champion, that's why I created the article.
I tried to userfy this User:Marvellous Spider-Man/Dakota Ditcheva as I think the nominator is right about WP:NKICK but wrong about WP:GNG.
My page move was reverted, I don't want this to be deleted but userfied like Kayla Day AFD. There are some AFD regulars who don't do their own research while voting. Marvellous Spider -Man 17:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw. You userfied User:Rainbow Archer/Kayla Day based upon the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayla Day. About a week later, a different editor created Kayla Day. I'm not sure if WP:G4 applies here because apparently the player in question (according to User talk:Marvellous Spider-Man#User:Rainbow Archer/Kayla Day and this edit) accomplished something after the article was userfied that has made her notable per WP:NSPORT or Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines#Player. If she is now notable, then I'm wondering if a history merge is needed for the draft and the article and whether there should be some mention of the original AfD on the talk page of the article. Also, I'm not sure why a new article needed created when the draft could've just been moved to the article namespace. Could you take a peak at this when you have a spare moment or two? Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 04:39, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
OK, very thanks for your help. I also temporarily put link to my archive page in my talk. Regards. Dawid2009 ( talk) 16:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, do you can make a copyedit in Paper soccer ? I am not a native English spoeaker and it is difficult to me to correct it article better. I am an author of the sections of the strategies and XRSoccer. Main author of the gameplay on large playing area there was mainly Alhesoft. regards. Dawid2009 ( talk) 19:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lowell Goddard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Dominion Post. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
User:KGirlTrucker81 has asked for a deletion review of Tomas Gorny. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Cryptic 20:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw,
Some of the reports that I have made are a bit preemptive because of the long history of vandalism coming from them. When looking at the block logs, I see that the IP addresses have been blocked in the past, so I figure that they don't need as sufficient enough warnings... I've reported IP's to AIV on numerous occasions (in similar situations) where the IP's are indeed eventually blocked.
Actually, I find that a fair amount of admins block IP's shortly after they have vandalized, if they have a very long block record on them... not a critique on your part at all, but just an observation, that's all... 73.96.115.3 ( talk) 03:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
A good example is this. I see here that you and Paul Erik made the block at the same exact time, and the duration is significantly different. 73.96.115.3 ( talk) 03:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Mkdw. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review
the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators'
mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
First of all thank you for using my SkipPurge script. If you could please add a backlink besides it to User:VarunFEB2003/SkipPurge I'd be really really grateful. Thanks a lot! Varun FEB2003 15:03, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
You know that this is an alternate account to User:BadaBoom right? - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 03:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:OUP#Apply. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Your request has been approved. Please see the e-mail for more information. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 22:42, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Your access to Scholarships has been renewed, I'm Working on Journals it may take an additional 2 to 4 weeks. -- Cameron11598 (Talk) 23:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Okay I found David Elmasllari (actor) on the new page feed, which it appears that David Elmasllari is a locked page, I'm not sure though if this is the same guy who has the page protection or not, so I figured I ask you. Wgolf ( talk) 20:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Martine van Hamel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 13:38, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
On 22 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Martine van Hamel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martine van Hamel won a gold medal at the 1966 Varna International Ballet Competition, one of the most prestigious dance competitions in the world? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Martine van Hamel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Martine van Hamel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Chris Woodrich ( talk)) 00:02, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
You issued some blocks for the sockpuppet investigation for TheErectile. His page tag was changed to an indef block without an indef block being given. Were you planning an indef block on him or should the tag be corrected?
Thanks -- Dane2007 talk 18:38, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Announcing two exciting online editathons |
-- Ipigott ( talk) 10:59, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event:
Best Wishes, Addis Wang
Sent by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
battle ship and ballerina
Thank you for quality articles such as HMS Curacoa (D41) and Hee Seo, for service over ten years beginning with topics around Vancouver, for your admin work and the courage to step in the arb ring, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 18:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Just a note on your extended statement—in my experience, there is usually a flood of noms and renoms in the last day or few hours. The discrepancy is usually just editors staking out the field. I wouldn't be concerned about too few nominations or at least I don't recall a precedent for such a concern coming to fruition. Regardless, thanks for volunteering to serve czar 19:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I am still somewhat new to posting and noticed the G.D. Crain page got deleted due to a lack of sources. I'm not sure if it's because it was "G.D. Crain" instead of the "G.D. Crain Jr" mentioned here or just lack of primary sources. The NY Times did an obituary on G.D. listed here: http://www.nytimes.com/1973/12/17/archives/gd-crain-jr-dies-at-88-published-advertising-age.html?_r=0 . As a result, I truly do believe that he's notable enough to be included on Wikipedia. What would I need to do to get his page reconsidered?
Pokeefe363 ( talk) 15:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins). MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw,
As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).
Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.
Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.
It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.
(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.
Hello, Mkdw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Two new topics for our online editathons |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Her user page article doesn't look bad. Can you explain her to move it to draft. She recreates her deleted userpage. -- Marvellous Spider-Man 13:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) ( user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Congratulations on your success in the elections and welcome to the 2017 Arbitration Committee. Please email arbcom-en-clists.wikimedia.org indicating which, if any, of the checkuser and oversight permissions you wish to be assigned for your term. Please also tell us what email address you would like to have subscribed to the Arbitration Committee mailing lists.
Over the coming days, you will receive a small number of emails. Please carefully read them. If they are registration emails, please follow any instructions in them to finalize registration. You can contact me or any other arbitrator directly if you have difficulty with the induction process.
Thank you for volunteering to serve on the committee. We very much look forward to introducing ourselves to you on the mailing list and to working with you this term.
For the Arbitration Committee,
GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Mkdw, I have granted you the CU and OS flag. You can subscribe to checkuser-l and contact an op for access to #wikimedia-checkuser and #wikimedia-privacy. Congratulations and regards, -- Menti fisto 06:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Go Phightins ! 00:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Mkdw: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America 1000 15:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13 Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))
Hello Mkdw: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, GAB gab 03:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Can you delete said article and close the AfD discussion for it? Thanks. Dr. Neurosis ( talk) 19:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello Mkdw, Can you please take a look at this ticket we received regarding an article you deleted as G5. The customer claiming that the article was created by an unauthorised third party without subject's knowledge or consent and they want to repost the same article. Thank you – GSS ( talk) 16:41, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Women Philosophers &
Women in Education online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
This
edit request to
User:Mkdw has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2602:306:36D5:5690:281E:9B12:E1D3:372F ( talk) 03:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Mkdw,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (
talk)
23:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Hello Mkdw, The customer of this ticket was requesting to remove the contents added by an IP address by citing a source in the Croatian language. A newly registered user already deleted the contents and I closed the ticket by replying the same but do you think that the revisions from 753058748 to 758427194 need to be deleted too if the claim is unverifiable? Thank you – GSS ( talk| c| em) 11:41, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
Scott Santaniello ( talk · contribs) should not be tagged as a blocked proven sock per sock master Scottbourbon ( talk · contribs) not being blocked (just warned). Right? Just clarifying, and thanks for archiving. -- JustBerry ( talk) 21:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. You deleted Chris Santos (actor) per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Waffen77. Could you check the recently created Chris Santos (Actor). Thanks, Tassedethe ( talk) 00:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi Mkdw/Archive 7, in August 2014 you criticized Temporary foreign worker program in Canada, an article I started earlier that year, saying on its talk-page that it was: ...exceptionally out of date, and also contain some information that at 'no point in time' has been correct. However, after boasting on the talkpage saying you were very familiar with Canadian immigration legislation, etc etc, all you contributed to the article itself was a big box at the top that said:
You did not elaborate on the talk page to explain what and how the article should be corrected.
Just wondering why you did not feel the need to help the development of this article? I would like a receive a talkback. Thank you in advance, Ottawahitech ( talk) 20:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me
I will note the articles are both exceptionally out of date, and also contain some information that at 'no point in time' has been correct.
Hi there. I am lead writer for the Signpost's "Arbitration Report" and am wondering if you would be interested in answering some interviews questions as a newly elected Arbitrator. The questions can be asked through email, unless answering them here would be a more suitable choice. GamerPro64 20:24, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
GamerPro64 03:31, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Mkdw/Archive 7 I a writing to you since you seem to be the lead editor at wiki project Vancouver. I don’t know if you are aware of the Miscellaneous Statutes (Housing Priority Initiatives) Amendment Act, an article which I started on 29 July 2016 , and which has miraculously escaped any deletion attempt, so far. It is about a topic (15% foreign tax on housing in Vancouver) which has countless economic and social implications to the city/province, to Canada, as well as other countries.
I have been working on this article on and off with some help and some obstruction from other editors. It is a very complex topic and I am totally swamped with other wiki-stuff and wanted to get help from other editors, so I have been adding wp:RSs to the talk-page in the hope that others will use them in the article.
Here is where I could use your help: An editor has been blanking the talk-page, thus preventing me and others from using these RSs for the development of the article/ and from posting any more RSs . Can you help? Ottawahitech ( talk) 15:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me
Hi! Gmaxwell responded to you on his talkpage. When you add that situation to the STOCKS, please explain what happened, I am quite curious. ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 21:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Black Women &
Women Anthropologists online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I've relisted an RfC that was run at WT:Admin in Sept. 2015. It is at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Concrete proposal 3 as there are a number of similar proposals going on at the same place. Better to keep them together. Smallbones( smalltalk) 04:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm not reticent about making a statement; I'm just not sure about where and when to post. I'd hate to jeopardize me "case" by getting zapped at the last minute for "unauthorized posting on an arbcom page".
But I tell you, I'm much more easy-going than I used to be. So, if I'm allowed to edit without a ban/restriction again, I shall do no more than plant seeds. If people disagree with my edits, I'll just go with the flow. -- Uncle Ed ( talk) 17:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
How can I vote for you in Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates?
Greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfair ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
I've been meaning to drop by since the election results were announced and say congrats. Thought this barnstar was more than deserved for all you have done here over the last 10+ years since we first bumped into one another. WJBscribe (talk) 20:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC) |
For some reason, I found myself thinking about this, and I see it's now 10 years to the day since my last comment on that page, so this seems a timely moment to say 'Hi'. With the benefit of hindsight, I think I was probably a little green myself to be giving editors advice back in Jan/Feb 2007 and there are a few points I would definitely argue with myself about these days ;-). The comment about % mainspace contributions makes me laugh given my dismal stats in that area these days. Still, glad you're still here in spite of some dubious early advice! WJBscribe (talk) 20:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to... Women's History Month worldwide online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hello Mkdw, Realitease just recreated Rich Kids of Instagram (UK series) and Emir Bahadir (developer) both articles were deleted by you as G5 under their original title Rich Kids of Instagram and Emir Bahadir and I'm unable to find the investigation page so can you please look at it. Thank you – GSS ( talk| c| em) 16:21, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to
Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) ---- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I'm not sure exactly what you meant, but I don't think it was "perfunctory".
All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough,
19:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC).
Hi Mkdw. As an explanation for this fat finger (thumb) mistake, I offer this. Sorry about that! — DoRD ( talk) 09:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
The article Anjhula_Mya_Singh_Bais that you deleted a moment ago has been recreated with the exact same contents by a sock. You should delete this article and make it creation protected. Thanks- Mar11 ( talk) 05:44, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Mar11: The issue here isn't about verifiable. You have found more than enough sources. I'm not asking for WP:BOMBARD but rather context about why this individual is notable. Please refer to WP:PERSON. Basically you have sources that support a simple statement that she's a model, actress, etc. Nothing in the draft actually talks substantively about why she is notable and thereby received coverage. What sets her apart? What is her credible claim to notability? I would have no idea why she's famous or accomplished based upon reading the draft. Mkdw talk 03:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to articles about women on Wikipedia. I thought I'd let you know about the women's football/soccer task force, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer (WOSO). If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks! |
Welcome to
Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 19:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
What you said at WT:HA was extraordinarily kind, and I really appreciate it. -- Tryptofish ( talk) 23:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Women in Red's June 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Martine van Hamel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System ( talk) 10:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Martine van Hamel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Martine van Hamel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seraphim System -- Seraphim System ( talk) 16:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Women in Red's July 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 02:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Might be worth noting the subject is propagating BS on Twitter themselves. There's quite a few more too... CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:32, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
I saw your comment about User IDs on the Linley discussion from last month, so I thought I'd give you some background. The UserID feature got turned on somewhere in January 2002 and all of the active editors then registered. It got turned on while I was asleep (I'm in an Australian timezone) which is why my userID was 100. (And yes, six hours had gone by but I still came in at #100). If Linley's number is 111 then they were clearly around at that time, but I don't think they were "a regular", else I would remember them. There were only about 30-40 people editing the entire site, so you could easily get to know everyone. (I'm still in touch with some of them).
When the admin role became available (about a month later, Feb or Mar of 2002) Jimbo promoted a block of about 15-20 of us to admin, and all those accounts retained their admin rights when we moved to MediaWiki in 2003. Except for some admin-stripping that occurred due to some fairly outrageous events in 2004 (which led to the creation of ArbCom), all of those accounts retained admin up until the "inactivity" desysop that occurred in (when was it... 2011? 2012?).
Anyway, random useless trivia, but you seemed interested in the ID values, so I thought I'd share. Regards Manning ( talk) 07:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
The Civility Barnstar | |
For still keeping your cool with all that delusional KD bullshit. Good job! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:17, 19 July 2017 (UTC) |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The inline citation was next to where it said she was from McKeesport, Pennsylvania but the infobox says Leesport, Pennsylvania which you say is corroborated by the IC. Fine, but then I find this edit [9]] of yours very curious. Why would someone from Leesport, which is approximately [10] 75 miles from Philadelphia qualify for a list of people from Pittsburgh metro area when that is over 260 miles [11] from Leesport. What's more fascinating, you added her to the McKeesport article with this edit [12] Can you see why this is confusing and can you double check the source. I do notice that you're the article creator. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
I re-added her to the Pittsburgh list and re-edited to her article to make it say she grew up in Pittsburgh. Here is another source [18] for it and I put it into her article.
FYI I have created well over 100 People from categories or Scientists, Writers, Sportspeople from categories. I just don't create those categories, I populate them too. Here is a Scientiss [19] and how about a Pennsylvania town article I created [20] just this week. Editors have come around to my talk page to thank me [21] for my categorizing work and Editor Alansohn may have steam coming out of his ears if you cared to mention my name to him due to my nominating at CFD People from categories he created. I've been very active at WP:CFD with nominating small community people from categories for merging. I've been doing People from editing for 5 years or more. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me! SunnyBoi ( talk) 08:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. I'd like to answer your series of questions to the parties, but doing so will eat into the word count I have mostly used up already. May I have permission not to count my answers to your questions toward word count? I will keep the total word count for all seven answers under 200 words if you can do that. ~ Rob13 Talk 02:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Women in Red is pleased to introduce... A new initiative for worldwide online coverage: 1day1woman | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 03:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Welcome to Women in Red's August 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --
Introducing... WiR's new initaitve: 1day1woman for worldwide online coverage Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 12:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC) |
Were you? Because if I missed meeting you that would really suck :( Legoktm ( talk) 22:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Women in Red's September 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 21:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
But I think this is Vote (X) for Change, a LTA. — fortuna velut luna 13:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
I really think I need to apologize to you personally for pressing so hard to get the Arthur Rubin request moved to an open case, since you are the Arb who seems to have drawn the short straw on it. I had no inking that TRM wasn't going to participate. In the future, before I take up a banner in that way, I guess I need to check with the principals to see if they're going to follow through. In any case, I do apologize.
I'm embarrassed, and don't know what to do now. I'm not a party to the case, and am fairly uninvolved except for commenting in the AN/I thread. Do I attempt to put together a neutral and dispassionate timeline of events and offer it as evidence? Is that allowable, or advisable? Or should I leave well enough alone? Your advice would be appreciated. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 22:48, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
I already posted it on AN on September 1, scroll up GorillaWarfare (talk) 18:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. sorry yes, I wanted to endorse. I must have not read the listing carefully. AsadUK200 ( talk) 17:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)AsadUK200