@ DGG, Bonadea, and Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Re: this discussion. It has been quite a lot of time. What happened to the merge/delete proposal? Varun FEB2003 17:49, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
You cannot unilaterally decide a page is "not yet ready to be in article namespace" and move a page to the Draft namespace. If you feel a page isn't ready, you either CSD it or AFD it. You are not part of WP:AFC, you were not asked by the creator to move the page to Draft (which happens occasionally when faced with deletion), and thus you should not be moving the page (unless it's for legitimate reasons like spelling, caps, or DAB). Finally, you moved the page half an hour after it was created, and it was significantly improved shortly thereafter. Not only is this BITING behavior, it's improper for a page under construction. The fact that in this case you happened to be right is completely immaterial. I'll be completely honest here; you seem to have some talent with computers, but you also have some issues when it comes to (what I will call) the "admin" side of things. I highly suggest you stick to editing Wikipedia (doing translating work and whatnot, which you are good at), and leave the task of dealing with new pages, copy editing, and discussion-closing alone for a while until you've gained some more experience. Primefac ( talk) 03:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC) What are you trying to pull with File:Fantasy land waterfall.png ? - NQ (talk) 10:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
That is not from Singapore or Malaysia. That is a picture of the
Urederra river springs. So once again, why are you lying? -
NQ
(talk) 10:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
You are claiming File:Happy3.png, an emoji, as your own work. Again, what are you doing? – Jonesey95 ( talk) 13:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:Happy3.pngA tag has been placed on File:Happy3.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wiki Pancake ✉ 📖 14:03, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:Confused3.pngA tag has been placed on File:Confused3.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Begoon 15:29, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Discussion at WP:AN about your conductThis message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding your recent conduct and editing history. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 00:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely. Even while a discussion about such a block was ongoing and you already tried to save your skin by proposing a one-week block and afterwards staying away from all problem areas, you went to another area, DYK, which you again totally screwed up. Coupled with the copyvio lies above, it is clear that at the moment, you are too often editing in a disruptive way and don't show the necessary competence. Unless the discussion at WP:AN comes to another conclusion, I would urge you not to request unblock for at least a week, and then only with a very strict set of things you plan to do to avoid running into similar problems in the future. Fram ( talk) 08:26, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Stop pinging everyone. It's annoying. You won't be unblocked today. Wait 6 months, then appeal.
ThePlatypusofDoom
(talk) 14:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
During this break, read the pages about Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Don't ignore the sub-sections. Most newcomers read the upper part and don't scroll down below. You are engaged in many areas with no experience. You should never think of WP:BLOCK EVASION, even with IP address. IP editing is also WP:SOCK. Right now, you lack WP:CIR. Don't put any unblock appeal before reading every details of Wikipedia:What to do if you are blocked Lastly you have to read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.39.37.220 ( talk • contribs)
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2016)
I've just nominated another obvious copyright violation you've uploaded for deletion; I don't believe for a instant that you either have the technical skills to draw botanically accurate fall leaves, nor that an editor in Delhi would choose to depict a species which isn't found within a 10,000 km range of India. Do you want to save me wasting more of my time searching for the original, and tell me where you stole it from? I appreciate that you can't comment at the FFD discussion; in the unlikely event that you want to try to defend this, post a reply here with a request that someone move it across and one of us will copy-and-paste it to FFD. ‑ Iridescent 16:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. File:Certificate3.png listed for discussionATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 23:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Why does the user page have doubleunderscoreINDEXdoubleunderscore on it? Should it? -- Stfg ( talk) 09:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:Analog clock 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:Image usage by The Toggle Suite has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Whpq ( talk) 16:43, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Sorry VarunFEB2003, I only tend to check my email when I get a ping or TP message, and that didn't seem to happen- sorry about that. But, the current situation seems to be the best opportunity available atm. Take care, Muffled Pocketed 16:52, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Hello to all of you! I continuously used to visit this page waiting for March to come! Today I do not write this message as an unblock appeal or something (as I believe I deserved to be blocked) but I saw something objectionable today which I want to bring to your notice. JJBers has moved 9 subpages of mine in to someone else's userspace without my permission. I want these changes reverted and the new pages created deleted. The affected pages are -
Pinging @ Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi and Boing! said Zebedee:. Thank you so much Varun FEB2003 14:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
I didn't get you. FIles regarding?
Varun
FEB2003 14:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello
Sparkyscience,
Template:Clickable button 3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo) talk 02:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Hello VarunFEB2003, Your script
User:VarunFEB2003/IndianMilitaryUtility.js is no longer functional because it attempts to get an Category:Clock templates has been nominated for merging
Category:Clock templates, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry on the
categories for discussion page. Thank you. —
andrybak (
talk) 22:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:User talk pagesTemplate:User talk pages has been nominated for merging with Template:Userspace disclaimers. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Template:Column Templates Navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno ( talk) 02:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Pashto IPA chart vowels with audio/sandboxTemplate:Pashto IPA chart vowels with audio/sandbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej ( talk) 14:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC) |
@ DGG, Bonadea, and Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Re: this discussion. It has been quite a lot of time. What happened to the merge/delete proposal? Varun FEB2003 17:49, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
You cannot unilaterally decide a page is "not yet ready to be in article namespace" and move a page to the Draft namespace. If you feel a page isn't ready, you either CSD it or AFD it. You are not part of WP:AFC, you were not asked by the creator to move the page to Draft (which happens occasionally when faced with deletion), and thus you should not be moving the page (unless it's for legitimate reasons like spelling, caps, or DAB). Finally, you moved the page half an hour after it was created, and it was significantly improved shortly thereafter. Not only is this BITING behavior, it's improper for a page under construction. The fact that in this case you happened to be right is completely immaterial. I'll be completely honest here; you seem to have some talent with computers, but you also have some issues when it comes to (what I will call) the "admin" side of things. I highly suggest you stick to editing Wikipedia (doing translating work and whatnot, which you are good at), and leave the task of dealing with new pages, copy editing, and discussion-closing alone for a while until you've gained some more experience. Primefac ( talk) 03:38, 6 October 2016 (UTC) What are you trying to pull with File:Fantasy land waterfall.png ? - NQ (talk) 10:25, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
That is not from Singapore or Malaysia. That is a picture of the
Urederra river springs. So once again, why are you lying? -
NQ
(talk) 10:47, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
You are claiming File:Happy3.png, an emoji, as your own work. Again, what are you doing? – Jonesey95 ( talk) 13:06, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:Happy3.pngA tag has been placed on File:Happy3.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wiki Pancake ✉ 📖 14:03, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:Confused3.pngA tag has been placed on File:Confused3.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Begoon 15:29, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Discussion at WP:AN about your conductThis message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding your recent conduct and editing history. Thank you. Primefac ( talk) 00:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely. Even while a discussion about such a block was ongoing and you already tried to save your skin by proposing a one-week block and afterwards staying away from all problem areas, you went to another area, DYK, which you again totally screwed up. Coupled with the copyvio lies above, it is clear that at the moment, you are too often editing in a disruptive way and don't show the necessary competence. Unless the discussion at WP:AN comes to another conclusion, I would urge you not to request unblock for at least a week, and then only with a very strict set of things you plan to do to avoid running into similar problems in the future. Fram ( talk) 08:26, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
Stop pinging everyone. It's annoying. You won't be unblocked today. Wait 6 months, then appeal.
ThePlatypusofDoom
(talk) 14:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
During this break, read the pages about Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Don't ignore the sub-sections. Most newcomers read the upper part and don't scroll down below. You are engaged in many areas with no experience. You should never think of WP:BLOCK EVASION, even with IP address. IP editing is also WP:SOCK. Right now, you lack WP:CIR. Don't put any unblock appeal before reading every details of Wikipedia:What to do if you are blocked Lastly you have to read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.39.37.220 ( talk • contribs)
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2016)
I've just nominated another obvious copyright violation you've uploaded for deletion; I don't believe for a instant that you either have the technical skills to draw botanically accurate fall leaves, nor that an editor in Delhi would choose to depict a species which isn't found within a 10,000 km range of India. Do you want to save me wasting more of my time searching for the original, and tell me where you stole it from? I appreciate that you can't comment at the FFD discussion; in the unlikely event that you want to try to defend this, post a reply here with a request that someone move it across and one of us will copy-and-paste it to FFD. ‑ Iridescent 16:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. File:Certificate3.png listed for discussionATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 23:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC) Why does the user page have doubleunderscoreINDEXdoubleunderscore on it? Should it? -- Stfg ( talk) 09:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:Analog clock 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:20, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
Template:Image usage by The Toggle Suite has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Whpq ( talk) 16:43, 12 October 2016 (UTC) Sorry VarunFEB2003, I only tend to check my email when I get a ping or TP message, and that didn't seem to happen- sorry about that. But, the current situation seems to be the best opportunity available atm. Take care, Muffled Pocketed 16:52, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Hello to all of you! I continuously used to visit this page waiting for March to come! Today I do not write this message as an unblock appeal or something (as I believe I deserved to be blocked) but I saw something objectionable today which I want to bring to your notice. JJBers has moved 9 subpages of mine in to someone else's userspace without my permission. I want these changes reverted and the new pages created deleted. The affected pages are -
Pinging @ Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi and Boing! said Zebedee:. Thank you so much Varun FEB2003 14:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
I didn't get you. FIles regarding?
Varun
FEB2003 14:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello
Sparkyscience,
Template:Clickable button 3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo) talk 02:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Hello VarunFEB2003, Your script
User:VarunFEB2003/IndianMilitaryUtility.js is no longer functional because it attempts to get an Category:Clock templates has been nominated for merging
Category:Clock templates, which you created, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry on the
categories for discussion page. Thank you. —
andrybak (
talk) 22:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:User talk pagesTemplate:User talk pages has been nominated for merging with Template:Userspace disclaimers. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:16, 24 October 2020 (UTC) Template:Column Templates Navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno ( talk) 02:17, 6 January 2021 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Pashto IPA chart vowels with audio/sandboxTemplate:Pashto IPA chart vowels with audio/sandbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej ( talk) 14:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC) |