|
Please take care not to add duplicate tags as you did at Patricia Chou. Thanks. Pam D 23:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Heath (probabilist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Probabilist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Aminta Granera , but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk) 23:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aminta Granera, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anastasio Somoza and La Prensa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Thank you for linking to Charles Coates Walker from the Peace Brigades International article! Willbeaden667 ( talk) 13:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peace Brigades International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Willoughby. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neernemula, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paddy and Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balangiga massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manilla ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shared parenting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Survey ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, Martinogk, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a number of women's biographies. I hope there will be many more. Please let me know if you run into any trouble or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 10:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to
Canadian Equal Parenting Council, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's
categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a
non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. Thank you. --
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs) 03:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
I know it's not of the greatest importance, but if you do not follow conventions,peoplearegoing to have to spend time changing these: Article and book titles go in Italics, and when speaking about the US Parties, Democrat and Republican have capitals. DGG ( talk ) 01:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Equal Parenting Council is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Equal Parenting Council until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Malin Bergström.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
You don't need 9 citations for that first claim, one or two will suffice.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 21:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Thoroddur Bjarnason.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
MainlyTwelve ( talk) 03:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leading Women for Shared Parenting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading Women for Shared Parenting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Celi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Celi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Martinogk,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Molly Olson should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Olson .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Citrivescence ( talk) 01:22, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
As I think you know, these days in WP I am much more concerned about promotionalism than notability . dThe mostdifficult type of promotionalism to dea lwith is advocac yfor causes that many people would support. It's very hard to write about them in a NPOV fashion--it's easier to be fair towards our enemies, than maintain a proper critical distance from our friends.
The usual difficulties in writing about sympathetic advocacy organizations is to avoid repeatedly quoting or restating their principles, adding making excessive instances of their successes, aand wording what they are trying to accomplish in a neutral manne,r rather than in words caluclated to sound universally appealing.
I have just reworked National Parents Organization to try to deal with these problems. I hope you will understand that what I have done is what I think would make it a more effective article, not to try to dimish its importance..
We have discussed this before, on my user talk at [1]. with respect to Ned Holstein--as the article had not been improved, I made some rather extensive cuts, removing material which taled not about him, but were examples of the positions he advocates. .
In particular, I have problem with the phrase in this and related articles "those who believe children do best when they have a healthy relationship with both their mother and their father. " This catch phrase is worded to prejudice the issue--those who would oppose shared parenting either in general or in particular instances are likely to believe that the results of a divorce are very apt to be so bitter as to prevent such healthy relationship. (I don't think I have any axe to grind here--I am apparently quite old-fashioned in some ways for someone who considers himself a social libertarian, for I cannot think of a situation among either my relatives or my close friends of a divorce involving children. ) It's easier to look at this objectively when one is not involved. What I think the best way to handle it is to not use such a phrase more than once an article, and if possible, only in a quoted policy statement. "Shared parenting" is I think the neutral phrase. (Need I point out that the earlier term for this was Men's rights, implying that conventional policy in this area was to favor the woman; this is , of course, rather different from the view of most feminist organizations, which have historically been concerned with situations where the bias is in the other direction, in particular the long-standing view that sexually active divorced women are unfit mothers).
Please don't change back what I have done without very careful consideration Rather, consider whether you would do well to make simialr changes in some other of your articles. DGG ( talk ) 08:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 06:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
![]()
|
![]()
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() ![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Special event:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() ![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() |
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Victuallers ( talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() ![]()
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi there, Martinogk. I am sorry to see you no longer intend to contribute to Women in Red but would like to thank you for the many biographies you created up to early 2019. On the other hand, it's good to see you are happier contributing articles about Nicaragua to the Swedish and Spanish wikis. I take to heart your comments on the problems you encountered in connection with the English version of Wikipedia. Over the years, we have been trying to make the site more welcoming to editors but it has not always been easy. The articles in our Press and Research sections reveal the difficulties we face. Please drop me a line if ever you think I can be of any assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 06:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Please take care not to add duplicate tags as you did at Patricia Chou. Thanks. Pam D 23:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Heath (probabilist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Probabilist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Aminta Granera , but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk) 23:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aminta Granera, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anastasio Somoza and La Prensa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence |
Thank you for linking to Charles Coates Walker from the Peace Brigades International article! Willbeaden667 ( talk) 13:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peace Brigades International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Willoughby. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neernemula, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paddy and Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balangiga massacre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manilla ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shared parenting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Survey ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, Martinogk, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a number of women's biographies. I hope there will be many more. Please let me know if you run into any trouble or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 10:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to
Canadian Equal Parenting Council, please make sure that the category page actually exists. In some cases, it may be appropriate to create a new category in accordance with Wikipedia's
categorization guidelines, but it is usually better to use the most specific available existing category. It is never appropriate to leave a page categorised in a
non-existent category, i.e. one whose link displays in red. Thank you. --
BrownHairedGirl
(talk) • (
contribs) 03:00, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
I know it's not of the greatest importance, but if you do not follow conventions,peoplearegoing to have to spend time changing these: Article and book titles go in Italics, and when speaking about the US Parties, Democrat and Republican have capitals. DGG ( talk ) 01:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Equal Parenting Council is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Equal Parenting Council until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Malin Bergström.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
You don't need 9 citations for that first claim, one or two will suffice.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 21:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Thoroddur Bjarnason.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
MainlyTwelve ( talk) 03:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leading Women for Shared Parenting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading Women for Shared Parenting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Celi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Celi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:35, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Martinogk,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Molly Olson should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Olson .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Citrivescence ( talk) 01:22, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
As I think you know, these days in WP I am much more concerned about promotionalism than notability . dThe mostdifficult type of promotionalism to dea lwith is advocac yfor causes that many people would support. It's very hard to write about them in a NPOV fashion--it's easier to be fair towards our enemies, than maintain a proper critical distance from our friends.
The usual difficulties in writing about sympathetic advocacy organizations is to avoid repeatedly quoting or restating their principles, adding making excessive instances of their successes, aand wording what they are trying to accomplish in a neutral manne,r rather than in words caluclated to sound universally appealing.
I have just reworked National Parents Organization to try to deal with these problems. I hope you will understand that what I have done is what I think would make it a more effective article, not to try to dimish its importance..
We have discussed this before, on my user talk at [1]. with respect to Ned Holstein--as the article had not been improved, I made some rather extensive cuts, removing material which taled not about him, but were examples of the positions he advocates. .
In particular, I have problem with the phrase in this and related articles "those who believe children do best when they have a healthy relationship with both their mother and their father. " This catch phrase is worded to prejudice the issue--those who would oppose shared parenting either in general or in particular instances are likely to believe that the results of a divorce are very apt to be so bitter as to prevent such healthy relationship. (I don't think I have any axe to grind here--I am apparently quite old-fashioned in some ways for someone who considers himself a social libertarian, for I cannot think of a situation among either my relatives or my close friends of a divorce involving children. ) It's easier to look at this objectively when one is not involved. What I think the best way to handle it is to not use such a phrase more than once an article, and if possible, only in a quoted policy statement. "Shared parenting" is I think the neutral phrase. (Need I point out that the earlier term for this was Men's rights, implying that conventional policy in this area was to favor the woman; this is , of course, rather different from the view of most feminist organizations, which have historically been concerned with situations where the bias is in the other direction, in particular the long-standing view that sexually active divorced women are unfit mothers).
Please don't change back what I have done without very careful consideration Rather, consider whether you would do well to make simialr changes in some other of your articles. DGG ( talk ) 08:49, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 06:45, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
![]()
|
![]()
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() ![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Special event:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() ![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() |
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Victuallers ( talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() ![]()
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]()
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi there, Martinogk. I am sorry to see you no longer intend to contribute to Women in Red but would like to thank you for the many biographies you created up to early 2019. On the other hand, it's good to see you are happier contributing articles about Nicaragua to the Swedish and Spanish wikis. I take to heart your comments on the problems you encountered in connection with the English version of Wikipedia. Over the years, we have been trying to make the site more welcoming to editors but it has not always been easy. The articles in our Press and Research sections reveal the difficulties we face. Please drop me a line if ever you think I can be of any assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 06:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)