This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
@ Beeblebrox and Kudpung: please see my user talk page at Wikisource:
There's an ongoing discussion related to an old user block you were both involved in. I had nothing to do with the block, but mentioned it on an AFD discussion, and the blocked user is now looking for answers. — Maile ( talk) 00:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I wish to appeal my block, but can't figure out from the guidance where one files an appeal. – Sca ( talk) 16:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Beeblebrox: On my talk, I wrote and attempted to post (file) an appeal, but somehow it doesn't look right. Could you please take a look at it and see if I made some formatting mistake? Thanks. –
Sca (
talk)
20:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
On 10/26, you said:
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.Hello Beeblebrox, whilst reading the essay you created, I was wondering why the mixed use of it is not and it is'nt. Just being curious. Thank you for your time. Lotje ( talk) 10:55, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in
Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and
consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.Hello. Previously when I have created articles I believe they have gone directly into project space. I recently created an article (yes, it's short and needs work, but is certainly article worthy) but it is now awaiting some kind of review process, that says it could take up to 3 months. Did I lose some kind of article creation right or did something change? I've created something like 8 other articles. Mr Ernie ( talk) 21:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey Beeblebrox. How are things down south? Still digging out of the snow? We got about 5 feet at my house, and I still have several more roofs to shovel. All the roads are still down to half the number of lanes they used to have. Anyhow, I just wanted to say thanks for all you do around here. I wish you and yours a very Merry Christmas, and may the coming New Year bring happiness and joy. Zaereth ( talk) 20:08, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
Hey Beeblebrox. I was reading through the responses to the RFCN you responded to and maybe a little goofy and clunky, but I don't see a policy violation stuck out to me as quite charming and rogueish plus a little self deprecating if used by myself. I was hoping to add a bit somewhere on my user page along the lines of 'this user has been described as' and then the quote. In the interest of making sure it's not seen as backhanded or dickish I wanted to ask you if you were ok with that first. -- (loopback) ping/ whereis 18:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Beeblebrox. I wish to inquire if you may please unsalt the Northernlion page. I know this article was salted over 6 years ago, but since then, multiple sources have emerged that prove his notability, so much so that this page was recently accepted to mainspace via AfC under Northernlion (gamer). The disambiguation is unnecessary, so I wanted to move it to Northernlion. Thanks, PantheonRadiance ( talk) 05:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Why did you clear a portion of my talk page? Did you get a complaint? Because everything I wrote can be backed up and I can provide diffs. Michael60634 ( talk) 18:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I caught your discussion at the 'other place' on the new look. Two questions, grateful for help. (1) How do I easily log in - the usual method is not available any more, (2) how do revert to the old look? My objections are the same as others: too much white space. Best wishes Peter Damian ( talk) 11:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
I don't think anybody was getting mad on the userpage for that (alleged) George Santos account, just a bunch of people trying to refine the wording on the courtesy-blanking template (and one person vandalizing it). I guess I am not complaining, since my version is the one that got protected :^) but I don't mind if someone comes up with a better phrasing for the template. jp× g 00:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, I wanted to let you know I unblocked this user just a bit ago. They were blocked solely for an offensive name, and have since changed to an appropriate username. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 15:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
You are an important person, I respect your authority and cower in fear from it. Tell me explicitly what do I need to do to get extended confirmed, I will do it. Uni3993 ( talk) 07:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
traviswilson112792 : date of birth .... 0mtwb9gd5wx ( talk) 08:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yoshi24517 Chat Online 05:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, would you be willing to move List of duo and trio cocktails to my userpage? I will try to re-write it with proper sourcing. ɱ (talk) 21:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Charlotte Checkers logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Need I say more? I suspect the IP ranges might be open proxies, but I don't know how to check. Thanks! — SamX [ talk · contribs] 04:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
I'm guessing the UTRS request that came after TPA was revoked was, erm, fun to read? I'm not sure what led to this, but it must have been a doozy. -- Jayron 32 19:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Sorry you had to deal with this. If I was online and had seen it I would have blocked it as a PA. TonyBallioni ( talk) 05:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
If you want to see a truly lightweight process, have a look at mine. And prior to that, the process was simply announcement one day on the EN-Wikipedia list by Jimmy Wales that if anyone wanted to be one, simply email him & he'd approve them. (I'm sure it wasn't a blanket approval, but unless one was a known troll or troublemaker, he rubber-stamped the request.) I doubt any from that tranche is still active; if any maybe Anthere. -- llywrch ( talk) 19:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I and others have proposed additional options at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#RfC_on_a_procedural_community_desysop. You may wish to review your position in that RfC. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Please let me know if I went over the top or violated decorum here. I'd be the last to know Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 18:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Category talk:Lists of airline destinations#Discussion on retaining articles in this category conveniently documents the changes. isaacl ( talk) 05:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
I live in Mainland China and I followed WP:IPBE accordingly after my previous IP block exemption expired. But emails to checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org can't be sent successfully, and then I tried UTRS in September 2022 with no immediate response, forcing me to quit Wikipedia, coming back now and see myself granted IPBE in January. Since each request only gives one year of the right, I found the 4-month delay intolerable, so I like to know how UTRS works: does it really have a 4-month backlog?.
On an unrelated issue I found so many wikipedians criticize the ArbCom, even if ArbCom is an elected body, and even after fresh ArbCom elections, can you offer insight on the situation? ibicdlcod ( talk) 09:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
I find the term degrading and insulting. As you say, it is used to lump together and disparage any and all admins from before (fill in date here). -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 22:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Regarding your comment on the term "legacy admins": at first I was going to say "without checking, I recall it being used in past discussions on Wikipedia", but hey, why not check. A few examples: it was used in the opening statement of Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Request for comment on administrator activity requirements, and thus subsequently by various commenters. I also see it used within Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Desysop Policy (2021), including by the editor who started the RfC. You used it (among others) in discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2021 review/Issues. I don't think there's any problem with having one or more terms to refer to earlier cohorts of administrators. I do agree such terms shouldn't be used as a shorthand to assume all of the admins included within this group act the same way, or even that the majority act in a certain undesirable way. isaacl ( talk) 22:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
In your latest comment in the AlisonW case request, you referred to "lagacy" admins (with an "a") in your first sentence, which I assume is a typo. Unless it was a deliberate reference, you might want to correct it before it gets picked up and used for "legacy" admins who "lag" behind current standards. (Because I don't read WPO, I actually don't know if it's already been used there and that is what you were referencing.) Beyond My Ken ( talk) 22:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hello, some time ago I was led to believe that asking other editors directly for their support in a consensus issue was frowned upon. PorkyPowerPeanut ( talk) 12:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Please judge for yourself when you have the time. Shearonink clearly knows he is soliciting, denying it, while he continues. Reading on, it becomes more and more evident that she will not only take his side, but take over from him, continually nit-picking wherever I am and whatever I am doing. PorkyPowerPeanut ( talk) 22:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox,
I wanted to seek your assistance on a user's actions, noting that you have previously blocked this user and issued a final warring in the unblock request, hence why I am seeking you.
I recently posted a warning on a third editor's talk page requesting the editor to stop making personal attacks on various other editors. This user reverted the message twice [31], [32], falsely claiming the message was illegitimate, and minimizing the editors actions, while quoting WP:DTTR, when I didn't actually use a template. Given that I'd had to revert the user twice [4], [5] and warned the user against disruptions of WP:DR attempts in the edit summaries, I posted a warning to the user page. Only then did the user stop reverting my warning. The editor being warned was later blocked after ignoring the warning, in part due to the personal attacks which I warned him for.
More recently, the user showed up at a WP:AN3 discussion relating to me. The user doubled-down on the previous accusations made relating to WP:DTTR [6] [7]. The user further casted aspersions [8], accusing me of having "a history of edit warring" and "dragging another user to ANEW over some supposed technical violation seems to me like it was just done out of spite, despite not having any interaction me beyond the above-mentioned incident. Additionally, the user criticized an admin, saying "I personally don't think the block was warranted to begin with, nor do I agree with the rationale given for the block, especially considering he wasn't given the chance to respond to the ANEW report", which seems to be WP:IDHT, when the user has been blocked for the violation.
As I pointed out at WP:AN3, WP:DTTR is a essay, not WP:PAG. A user's right to contact or warn another user is not diminished simply because the user has been on WP longer then the other. I find the users actions to be a clear disruption of WP:DR process. I believe that this attitude of simply reverting/blocking a less senior user's attempts at conflict resolution to be extremely disruptive. I further note that this both times I have interacted with this user, this user has inserted himself into good-faith attempts at WP:DR, and disrupted the attempts, without being initially involved.
Please let me know what you think and if further action is warranted. Thank you for your assistance. Carter00000 ( talk) 14:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
I no longer want rollback permissions, i can just use twinkle or redwarn, please remove my roll permissions, thanks Notrealname1234 ( talk) 00:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, why you are changed me from Pending rewiewer. TruxtVerified ( talk) 03:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for all your hard work, especially reviewing a lot of the permissions requests recently. You said you need coffee, so here you are! - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 16:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC) |
Hi Beeblebrox, I saw you gave Adamtt9 autopatrolled rights in 2016. They tend to create unfinished articles like this a month ago or this yesterday and release them into main space. Both are only examples which they repeated several times both times. I have opened a discussion about it on their talk page but no answer. Maybe you could have a word with them. Also the sources they use for their tournament articles are rather often not independent of the subject such as this one. They are one of the top article creators. I'd suggest they either get Autopatrolled removed or at least put on a trial of Autopatrolled for a month. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 06:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
@ Beeblebrox and Kudpung: please see my user talk page at Wikisource:
There's an ongoing discussion related to an old user block you were both involved in. I had nothing to do with the block, but mentioned it on an AFD discussion, and the blocked user is now looking for answers. — Maile ( talk) 00:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I wish to appeal my block, but can't figure out from the guidance where one files an appeal. – Sca ( talk) 16:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Beeblebrox: On my talk, I wrote and attempted to post (file) an appeal, but somehow it doesn't look right. Could you please take a look at it and see if I made some formatting mistake? Thanks. –
Sca (
talk)
20:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
On 10/26, you said:
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).
{{
rangeblock|create=yes}}
or {{
uw-ublock|contains profanity}}
.Hello Beeblebrox, whilst reading the essay you created, I was wondering why the mixed use of it is not and it is'nt. Just being curious. Thank you for your time. Lotje ( talk) 10:55, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
/64
to the end of an IP in
Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and
consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.Hello. Previously when I have created articles I believe they have gone directly into project space. I recently created an article (yes, it's short and needs work, but is certainly article worthy) but it is now awaiting some kind of review process, that says it could take up to 3 months. Did I lose some kind of article creation right or did something change? I've created something like 8 other articles. Mr Ernie ( talk) 21:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Hey Beeblebrox. How are things down south? Still digging out of the snow? We got about 5 feet at my house, and I still have several more roofs to shovel. All the roads are still down to half the number of lanes they used to have. Anyhow, I just wanted to say thanks for all you do around here. I wish you and yours a very Merry Christmas, and may the coming New Year bring happiness and joy. Zaereth ( talk) 20:08, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
Hey Beeblebrox. I was reading through the responses to the RFCN you responded to and maybe a little goofy and clunky, but I don't see a policy violation stuck out to me as quite charming and rogueish plus a little self deprecating if used by myself. I was hoping to add a bit somewhere on my user page along the lines of 'this user has been described as' and then the quote. In the interest of making sure it's not seen as backhanded or dickish I wanted to ask you if you were ok with that first. -- (loopback) ping/ whereis 18:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello Beeblebrox. I wish to inquire if you may please unsalt the Northernlion page. I know this article was salted over 6 years ago, but since then, multiple sources have emerged that prove his notability, so much so that this page was recently accepted to mainspace via AfC under Northernlion (gamer). The disambiguation is unnecessary, so I wanted to move it to Northernlion. Thanks, PantheonRadiance ( talk) 05:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Why did you clear a portion of my talk page? Did you get a complaint? Because everything I wrote can be backed up and I can provide diffs. Michael60634 ( talk) 18:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I caught your discussion at the 'other place' on the new look. Two questions, grateful for help. (1) How do I easily log in - the usual method is not available any more, (2) how do revert to the old look? My objections are the same as others: too much white space. Best wishes Peter Damian ( talk) 11:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
I don't think anybody was getting mad on the userpage for that (alleged) George Santos account, just a bunch of people trying to refine the wording on the courtesy-blanking template (and one person vandalizing it). I guess I am not complaining, since my version is the one that got protected :^) but I don't mind if someone comes up with a better phrasing for the template. jp× g 00:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, I wanted to let you know I unblocked this user just a bit ago. They were blocked solely for an offensive name, and have since changed to an appropriate username. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 15:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
You are an important person, I respect your authority and cower in fear from it. Tell me explicitly what do I need to do to get extended confirmed, I will do it. Uni3993 ( talk) 07:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
traviswilson112792 : date of birth .... 0mtwb9gd5wx ( talk) 08:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yoshi24517 Chat Online 05:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, would you be willing to move List of duo and trio cocktails to my userpage? I will try to re-write it with proper sourcing. ɱ (talk) 21:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Charlotte Checkers logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Need I say more? I suspect the IP ranges might be open proxies, but I don't know how to check. Thanks! — SamX [ talk · contribs] 04:50, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
I'm guessing the UTRS request that came after TPA was revoked was, erm, fun to read? I'm not sure what led to this, but it must have been a doozy. -- Jayron 32 19:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Sorry you had to deal with this. If I was online and had seen it I would have blocked it as a PA. TonyBallioni ( talk) 05:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
If you want to see a truly lightweight process, have a look at mine. And prior to that, the process was simply announcement one day on the EN-Wikipedia list by Jimmy Wales that if anyone wanted to be one, simply email him & he'd approve them. (I'm sure it wasn't a blanket approval, but unless one was a known troll or troublemaker, he rubber-stamped the request.) I doubt any from that tranche is still active; if any maybe Anthere. -- llywrch ( talk) 19:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I and others have proposed additional options at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#RfC_on_a_procedural_community_desysop. You may wish to review your position in that RfC. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Please let me know if I went over the top or violated decorum here. I'd be the last to know Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 18:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Category talk:Lists of airline destinations#Discussion on retaining articles in this category conveniently documents the changes. isaacl ( talk) 05:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
I live in Mainland China and I followed WP:IPBE accordingly after my previous IP block exemption expired. But emails to checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org can't be sent successfully, and then I tried UTRS in September 2022 with no immediate response, forcing me to quit Wikipedia, coming back now and see myself granted IPBE in January. Since each request only gives one year of the right, I found the 4-month delay intolerable, so I like to know how UTRS works: does it really have a 4-month backlog?.
On an unrelated issue I found so many wikipedians criticize the ArbCom, even if ArbCom is an elected body, and even after fresh ArbCom elections, can you offer insight on the situation? ibicdlcod ( talk) 09:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
I find the term degrading and insulting. As you say, it is used to lump together and disparage any and all admins from before (fill in date here). -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 22:09, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Regarding your comment on the term "legacy admins": at first I was going to say "without checking, I recall it being used in past discussions on Wikipedia", but hey, why not check. A few examples: it was used in the opening statement of Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Request for comment on administrator activity requirements, and thus subsequently by various commenters. I also see it used within Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Desysop Policy (2021), including by the editor who started the RfC. You used it (among others) in discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2021 review/Issues. I don't think there's any problem with having one or more terms to refer to earlier cohorts of administrators. I do agree such terms shouldn't be used as a shorthand to assume all of the admins included within this group act the same way, or even that the majority act in a certain undesirable way. isaacl ( talk) 22:17, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
In your latest comment in the AlisonW case request, you referred to "lagacy" admins (with an "a") in your first sentence, which I assume is a typo. Unless it was a deliberate reference, you might want to correct it before it gets picked up and used for "legacy" admins who "lag" behind current standards. (Because I don't read WPO, I actually don't know if it's already been used there and that is what you were referencing.) Beyond My Ken ( talk) 22:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Hello, some time ago I was led to believe that asking other editors directly for their support in a consensus issue was frowned upon. PorkyPowerPeanut ( talk) 12:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Please judge for yourself when you have the time. Shearonink clearly knows he is soliciting, denying it, while he continues. Reading on, it becomes more and more evident that she will not only take his side, but take over from him, continually nit-picking wherever I am and whatever I am doing. PorkyPowerPeanut ( talk) 22:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox,
I wanted to seek your assistance on a user's actions, noting that you have previously blocked this user and issued a final warring in the unblock request, hence why I am seeking you.
I recently posted a warning on a third editor's talk page requesting the editor to stop making personal attacks on various other editors. This user reverted the message twice [31], [32], falsely claiming the message was illegitimate, and minimizing the editors actions, while quoting WP:DTTR, when I didn't actually use a template. Given that I'd had to revert the user twice [4], [5] and warned the user against disruptions of WP:DR attempts in the edit summaries, I posted a warning to the user page. Only then did the user stop reverting my warning. The editor being warned was later blocked after ignoring the warning, in part due to the personal attacks which I warned him for.
More recently, the user showed up at a WP:AN3 discussion relating to me. The user doubled-down on the previous accusations made relating to WP:DTTR [6] [7]. The user further casted aspersions [8], accusing me of having "a history of edit warring" and "dragging another user to ANEW over some supposed technical violation seems to me like it was just done out of spite, despite not having any interaction me beyond the above-mentioned incident. Additionally, the user criticized an admin, saying "I personally don't think the block was warranted to begin with, nor do I agree with the rationale given for the block, especially considering he wasn't given the chance to respond to the ANEW report", which seems to be WP:IDHT, when the user has been blocked for the violation.
As I pointed out at WP:AN3, WP:DTTR is a essay, not WP:PAG. A user's right to contact or warn another user is not diminished simply because the user has been on WP longer then the other. I find the users actions to be a clear disruption of WP:DR process. I believe that this attitude of simply reverting/blocking a less senior user's attempts at conflict resolution to be extremely disruptive. I further note that this both times I have interacted with this user, this user has inserted himself into good-faith attempts at WP:DR, and disrupted the attempts, without being initially involved.
Please let me know what you think and if further action is warranted. Thank you for your assistance. Carter00000 ( talk) 14:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
I no longer want rollback permissions, i can just use twinkle or redwarn, please remove my roll permissions, thanks Notrealname1234 ( talk) 00:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, why you are changed me from Pending rewiewer. TruxtVerified ( talk) 03:22, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for all your hard work, especially reviewing a lot of the permissions requests recently. You said you need coffee, so here you are! - 🔥 𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 16:07, 21 July 2023 (UTC) |
Hi Beeblebrox, I saw you gave Adamtt9 autopatrolled rights in 2016. They tend to create unfinished articles like this a month ago or this yesterday and release them into main space. Both are only examples which they repeated several times both times. I have opened a discussion about it on their talk page but no answer. Maybe you could have a word with them. Also the sources they use for their tournament articles are rather often not independent of the subject such as this one. They are one of the top article creators. I'd suggest they either get Autopatrolled removed or at least put on a trial of Autopatrolled for a month. Paradise Chronicle ( talk) 06:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)