This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You are the author of these two templates. What is the distinction between them? Do we need two templates? {{
user pt-2}}
, for example, uses {{
user x}}
but appears to work if I change it to use {{
user x/doc}}
which is used by the majority of language user templates. There are only a handful of these template that use {{
user x}}
; ok to switch them to {{
user x/doc}}
?
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 23:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
{{
user x}}
and {{
user x/doc}}
but I don't think that those changes produce correct results. For example, compare:
{{
user x/doc}}
. Yesterday I changed the parameters supplied to {{
languages}}
in {{
user x/doc}}
to use
Module:ISO 639 name. There is a similar call to {{languages}}
in {{user x}}
; similar but not identical. Why?{{
user x}}
. What I got from you was changes to the two templates that were then reverted when I pointed out that the changes did not work. The changes and the reverts were accompanied by silence from you. Now, after I asked you about intentions, you chastise me for being uncivil. Thanks, but that isn't helpful so I'll noodle it out on my own.There are only a handful of these template that useI know now that it is ok to switch those few templates to{{ user x}}
; ok to switch them to{{ user x/doc}}
?
{{user x/doc}}
because that has been done.{{User x}}
reads:{{User x/doc}}
, which reads:Again, what's the problem? Hyacinth ( talk) 20:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
{{
user x}}
exists and is for the most part unused and contains code that more-or-less duplicates the code in {{
user x/doc}}
, probably nothing any longer. It would seem to me that the correct path forward is to move {{
user x/doc}}
to {{
user x doc}}
because that is the function performed by the template; {{
user x doc/doc}}
becomes the documentation page for {{user x doc}}
. The
language user templates are all modified to use {{user x doc}}
. {{user x}}
and {{user x/doc}}
can be deleted or re-purposed.@
Trappist the monk: Hi folks.
User:The Earwig alerted me to this discussion. I recently synched
Template:User x/doc to
Template:User x. I am now proposing to run a bot to change the parameter in the relevant transclusions of
Template:Documentation from Template:User x/doc
to Template:User x
. The proposal is at
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BsherrAWBBOT 2. After all transclusions have been changed, I will move the "noinclude" contents from the base page to the doc subpage, and add {{
Documentation}} in their place. I invite your comments here or there. Thanks very much. --
Bsherr (
talk)
15:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hyacinth. It's great that you wrote up an excerpt of Maple Leaf Rag, but please correct the time signature when you have a chance. It should be 2/4 (2 quarter note beats per measure), not 4/2 (4 half note beats per measure).
All the best,
Ikan Kekek ( talk) 08:41, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:A Hard Day's Night melody.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Equivalence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equivalence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwirkle ( talk) 06:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 14:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anyone can edit. Since you had some involvement with the Anyone can edit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf ( talk) 17:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Food issue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is way too broad to be a disambiguation page, and is not a useful technical term as an article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
17:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Food issue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Food issue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hyacinth. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Weekly television shows, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat ( talk) 00:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dizzy's Business Major seventh chord.mid. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:30, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dizzy's Business Major seventh chord.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:30, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Charlie Parker - Au Privave - circle progression dominant seventh.mid. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:26, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Charlie Parker - Au Privave - circle progression dominant seventh.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:27, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hyacinth. Thank you for your file on Commons. Please could you add this for french anacrouse : Début de Valet will ich dir geben, BWV 736. L'anacrouse est notée en rouge. Regards, -- Sidonie61 ( talk) 01:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal headings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 11:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal comments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 11:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal summaries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 11:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal headings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 14:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal comments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 14:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal summaries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 14:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Tristan chord as dominant with appoggiaturas Chailley.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Parenthetical referencing and WP:CITEVAR. All of the references in Osgood curve are cited, with in-text parenthetical references for the ones where it makes sense to name the author as part of the article text and footnotes for the rest. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Free reeds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Please have a look at the new section I added to Talk:Degree_(music), following your modification of the first example. — Hucbald.SaintAmand ( talk) 11:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing secondary dominant.mid. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 21:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing secondary dominant.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 21:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Administrators
must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:16, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, - Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Nearly a decade ago, in Harmonic seventh chord, you added this quote from Gage Averill's book: "There's a chord in a barbershop that makes the nerve ends tingle....We might all our chord a Super-Seventh!" Is that second sentence a typo, for "We might call our chord..."? I don't see how else to understand it, but didn't want to change a quote without checking the source. Rigadoun (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Greetings. Your nice score excerpt from Ludus Tonalis was converted a couple of years ago by DatBot to a much smaller file that unfortunately lost too much resolution. You’ll see now there are staff lines and stems missing. I don’t know what the best solution is, but I wanted to bring it to your attention. MJ ( t • c) 17:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
That should have been sufficient, but the bot ambushed it again a few days later. I wrote a query at the bot’s talk page. If you were to just revert to the previous version, would the bot do it again? MJ ( t • c) 15:19, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
@ DatGuy, Mark R Johnson, and Jerome Kohl: I wonder what the criteria which triggers DatBot to "Reduce size of non-free image". Size isn't even mentioned at W:NFCC. A brief explanation of DatBot is found at User:DatBot, but presumably DatBot would be more helpful and easier to understand if it explained how it works more fully (since the page it cites, W:NFCC, does not). Hyacinth ( talk) 23:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
@ Mark R Johnson: The "File history" does not have clickable "revert" buttons. Hyacinth ( talk) 00:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Bouchard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bouchard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Accademia Musicale Chigiana International Prize winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Ignore all consequences. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Ignore all consequences redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited L-system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parallel ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:05, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Template:Purpose needed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 17:04, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Category:Kenneth L. Hale Award recipients, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Category:Victoria A. Fromkin Lifetime Service Award recipients, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Figuration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Figure ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
In your music example for "Ostinato for Radiohead's 'Creep'..." you have chord symbols above 4 triads of tied whole notes, "G+, B+, C+, C-". I'm not sure why you used the "+" sign, as that is generally notation for an augmented triad, not a major one. The actual notes below are all major chords, not augmented, so this is wrong, or at least misleading.
Although a minus "-" sign is often used (but not recommended by notation experts) to indicate "minor", and the last chord is indeed a minor triad, the more conventional symbol is a lower-case "m". I trust you will understand my concern. I feel the notation line should be more like this: "G B C Cm".
Shermanbay ( talk) 11:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Shermanbay
Hyacinth, you redirected Minkowski island to Koch snowflake. No doubt they are connected, but the page does not mention Minkowski island. The only page the does, besides the original redirect, is Fractal antenna where there is a picture. Spinning Spark 17:49, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Please look up the definition of "depreciated" (meaning decreased in monetary value) and "deprecated" (meaning no longer supported by software). I will fix your new category names. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 04:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Should Category:Depreciated Portal:Literature pages be moved to Category:Deprecated Portal:Literature pages (since it contains, "pages that...have since been removed or replaced," and not pages which are cheaper than they used to be)? Hyacinth ( talk) 04:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Hyacinth, your deletion of Minkowski island is entirely out of process. Please restore it. It is unbecoming of an administrator to use the tools in a content dispute. Spinning Spark 18:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Is there anything that I could do for you, such as tedious tiny edits to multiple pages or the creation of images? For instance, I could create an image to demonstrate different construction methods leading to the same result (although, how does one tell from an image if someone is adding onto a figure and then shrinking the results, if they are cutting away from a figure, or if they are using rewrite rules?). Hyacinth ( talk) 22:56, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@ Spinningspark: The lead to the article, Koch snowflake, in which you claimed in an edit summary that, "We don't normally call for etys, that's something for Wiktionary," contains the etymology of "Koch snowflake":
The Mandelbrot set lead contains etymology:
The Julia set lead contains etymology for both "Julia set" and "Fatou set":
Who did you mean when you said "we"? Hyacinth ( talk) 23:57, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Compositions by genre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steven (Editor) ( talk) 01:27, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Template:Patience has been nominated for merging with Template:Solitaire. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Lord Belbury ( talk) 11:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Partial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partial until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Banana Sprite challenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banana Sprite challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 02:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Category:Linguistics, Language, and the Public Award recipients, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I found your Wikipedia:Mostly negative essay and I think it is great for identifying a bias in Wikipedia's design which we need to counter somehow to be more encouraging. Thanks for that. Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:32, 11 December 2019 (UTC) |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Musical object. Since you had some involvement with the Musical object redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 17:37, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
00:05, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Deacon Vorbis: Okay, [please] convince me: Why is an accusation without support or links a better edit summary than a copy and paste given Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Clearly if I add a comment to a talk page readers can tell I did so whether I write in my edit summary "added comment" or if I copy and paste a comment with a signature. If you convince me then I will become ardent. You have witnessed this, if not realized it: you convince me that an article should have more links and then I add more links but if you convince me an article should have less links then I remove more links. You may have found this confusing, and I can only assume this is because most editors are not as flexible and easy to convince as I am so you have interpreted my reactions as jokes or making a point (as me disagreeing with you when actually I changed my mind and agreed with you). If you care enough to complain, then I hope that you care enough to convince, and I am relatively easily convincible. Hyacinth ( talk) 23:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Overhand knot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Half knot ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 15:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Quality measure. Since you had some involvement with the Quality measure redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc ( talk) 18:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Age appropriateness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age appropriateness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn ( talk) 09:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello--
I have a question about the image you created of the Harmonic Series--curious how you made it, also if you would be willing to create a higher resolution version without the guidelines? Apologies if this is not the proper way to ask but I could not find other contact information for you. Would appreciate any response and happy to take offline if you prefer. Thank you!
Adam.masser ( talk) 03:15, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Candy Ken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:41, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Hyacinth
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mccapra and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Subjugation, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mccapra}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mccapra ( talk) 22:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Tactile illusions has been nominated for merging with Template:Optical illusions. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES ( talk) 13:59, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Temporal illusions has been nominated for merging with Template:Optical illusions. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES ( talk) 14:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Auditory illusions has been nominated for merging with Template:Optical illusions. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES ( talk) 14:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Category:Unmovable pages, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — andrybak ( talk) 20:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Can't move has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — andrybak ( talk) 20:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Michael Byron (composer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dramonline.org/albums/michael-byron-dreamers-of-pearl/notes. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Java Hurricane 05:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I just recently created a English Virginalist School template. I've noticed it is very similar to your Renaissance music manuscript sources one. Would you be open to the deletion of the Renaissance music manuscript sources one? Or do you think that's unnecessary and the Renaissance music manuscripts could have both templates on their pages? An English Virginalist School members template was needed and I thought it made sense to put the content from Renaissance music manuscript sources in it, as it's not like there are thousands of collections of virginal/virginalist music. Thanks, Aza24 ( talk) 08:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
The article Richard Middleton (musicologist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:N
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Kthxbay (
talk)
20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I see that you uploaded files of riffs from " You Really Got Me" and " Iron Man (song)". I nominated them for discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 5, where I invite you to discuss them. -- George Ho ( talk) 07:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Michael Byron (composer) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
This article was deleted at AfD. If you disagree you need to ask for a review at WP:DRV. You can't just unilaterally restore it yourself. Please revert your restoration and follow the consensus process. – bradv 🍁 20:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Can you please explain this edit for an editor who as far as I can tell has never edited the article that's at DRV? Praxidicae ( talk) 21:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect I Got Your Ice Cold Nugrape. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#I Got Your Ice Cold Nugrape until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 01:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nugrape Twins. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#Nugrape Twins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 01:15, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Byron (composer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Byron (composer) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 07:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:Pupils of Nadia Boulanger has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. b uidh e 05:11, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:Pupils of Olivier Messiaen has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. b uidh e 15:50, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hyacinth, I have a question about {{ Use Harvard referencing}}. I have encountered a number of pages that use mixed citation styles, including shortened footnote templates that link to full citations as well has plain text shortened footnotes that use the name, date, & page format to refer to but not to link to full citations. I was wondering if you meant for Template:Use Harvard referencing to indicate that all references should use Harvard referencing or to note that some citations use Harvard referencing, or that there is an opportunity to use Harvard referencing, within a given article. Peaceray ( talk) 16:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:Ars nova and subtilior has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Template:Renaissance music manuscript English sources has been nominated for merging with Template:English Virginalist School. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Aza24 ( talk) 23:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear Hyacinth,
I first have to apologize for this rather anonymous reaction. It is because I'm not a Wikipedian, although sometimes tempted but then again deciding to protect myself from getting addicted, and also from all the negativity as mentioned in your own essay. In addition I don't know if this is the right way to approach you with my question, but I could not find an Email address. So please forgive the nuisance of finding my issue here.
My question is about this sentence: "The timbre of a single reed instrument is related to the harmonic series, while the timbre of a double reed instrument includes only the odd harmonics since the two reeds alternately touch each other and separate while vibrating, thus cancelling out the even harmonics, and this may be compared to the timbre of a square wave." which you added in the introduction of the Wikipedia article on "Double reed" /info/en/?search=Double_reed
From Reference #2 ( https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Reed_Instruments) and also from material on the Music Acoustics site of the University of New South Wales, Sydney, (see https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/flutes.v.clarinets.html and https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/pipes.html ) I got the impression that the bores of the one-sided closed pipe being cylindrical or conical are responsible for the suppression, or not, of the even harmonics, and not whether the air is blown through a single or a double reed. And actually this leads to the opposite conclusion, namely that the clarinet with a single reed gives mainly odd harmonics.
I was just reading these UNSW articles a few days ago which triggered my interest. The explanation with the two touching reeds 'sounds' ;) to me not very convincing, but I have to admit that I also not fully understand the reasoning in the Australian papers.
So I'm still puzzled and was wondering if you can elaborate a bit more on this, and/or give some more context to the argument given in the present article.
Kind regards, Ben Smith -- 145.69.103.132 ( talk) 02:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC) (ben dot smith at telfort dot nl)
I quote:
Flue-pipes may be either "stopped" or "open". In a stopped pipe, the end remote from the mouth is closed by a tight-fitting stopper. There can be no motion of the air here, so that this end of the pipe is necessarily a node, while the mouth, at which there can be no variations of pressure, is a loop. Thus the possible modes of free vibration for the air inside a stopped pipe are those shewn in the above scheme (fig. 4).
For the first mode of vibration, the wave-length is four times the length of the pipe. This gives the fundamental note of the pipe. For the second mode, the wave-length is only a third of that of the fundamental mode, so that the frequency is three times that of the fundamental, and the note sounded is the third harmonic of the fundamental. The other modes of vibration sound the fifth, the seventh, the ninth harmonic, and so on. Thus a stopped pipe emits odd-numbered harmonics only, like a string plucked at its middle point.
If we now remove the stopper from the pipe, we shall find that the pipe emits the even-numbered harmonics only, the odd-numbered harmonics disappearing as soon as the stopper is withdrawn. The reason for this is that the open end of the pipe is no longer a node, but has become a loop because the pressure is that of the outside air. The scheme of vibration is now that shewn in fig. 49.
If we forget that our pipe ever had the stopper in it, we shall think that the top vibration (marked 2) as the fundamental note of the open pipe, although it is of course the octave of the fundamental note of the stopped pipe. The other modes of vibration (marked 4, 6, 8, etc.) now appear as the second, third, fourth, etc., harmonics of this new fundamental note, so that the pipe is sound all the harmonics of its own fundamental note.
This, however, is approximately true. In the first place, the open end of the pipe is not exactly a loop...
In the second place, it is even less legitimate to treat the mouth of the pipe as a loop.
— Jean, James (1937/1968/). Science & Music, p.137-9. Cambridge (1937) and then Dover, New York (1968). ISBN 0-486-61964-8.
Hyacinth ( talk) 02:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Jerome Kohl: Now the question is why does a conical bore act like a stopper when it's not a stopper? Hyacinth ( talk) 18:32, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for
this edit to Wikipedia "
Double reed". I came to the article because the edit caused the article to be placed into
Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica without Wikisource reference. This is because there is a special parameter called "wstitle
" which replaces "title
" in templates like {{
cite EB1911}}
. All you need to do to use it is to place Wikisource article name as an argument for wstitle like this:
{{cite EB1911 |wstitle=Reed Instruments}}
The full citation looks like this:
{{EB1911 |last=Schlesinger |first=Kathleen |wstitle=Reed Instruments |volume=22 |page=974}}
Which looks like this:
Schlesinger, Kathleen (1911). Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 22 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 974.. In
In addition the section
WP:FREECOPYING in the
Wikipedia:Plagiarism guideline was written to handle importing text from public domain text--which EB1911 is because of its age-- so instead of importing a a paragraph of text from EB1911 as a quote you can simply copy it and then add an attribution by removing the "cite
" at the start of the citation:
Here is some copied from EB1911 ({{EB1911|inline=1 |wstitle=Reed Instruments}})
Here is some copied from EB1911 (public domain: " Reed Instruments". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). 1911.)
One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in theThe parameter inline=1 is added if the citation is inline, because it changes the wording of the attribution slightly from that used if the reference in in a references section. You will find a more detailed explanation in the documentation included in the templates {{
cite EB1911}}
and {{
EB1911}}
. BTW there are a lot of these template pairs available for linking citations to Wikisource eg {{
DNB}}
and {{
cite DNB}}
The reason for simply including text from Public Domain (PD) sources and not quoting them is that the often archaic or floury Edwardian wording can be updated in the usual Wikipedia way -- something that can not be done if it is quoted.
If anything I have written is not clear or I can be of help in any other way please leave a message on my talk page. -- PBS ( talk) 12:34, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
As this conversation may need third parties to join in I have copied what I think are the pertinant paragraphs to Talk:Double reed. I have also asked you an aditional question there about inline citations. -- PBS ( talk) 07:57, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Please share your email address for contact. Please Hyacinth fandom ( talk) 13:08, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Category:Coxeter plane graphs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 16:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:Music eras has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aza24 ( talk) 04:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear Hyacinth/October 17, 2018 - June 23, 2024,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 9 equal temperament. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 1#9 equal temperament until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 14:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 10 equal temperament. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 1#10 equal temperament until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 14:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Could you add a reference for your addition here? TIA. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect French Words and Phrases. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 6#French Words and Phrases until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Template:Extended techniques has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Why? I Ask ( talk) 06:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Template:Use Harvard referencing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Francis Schonken ( talk) 11:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Population density, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Standing stock.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:PDF. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 3#Wikipedia:PDF until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Out-of-process category deletions by user:Hyacinth. Thank you.. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 12:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
made [your] edits based on precedence.
@ BrownHairedGirl and Praxidicae: buidhe said, "I am starting to wonder if most or all of the daughter cats of Category:All music pupils by teacher are nondefining," and none of the comments specify Messiaen as the only invalid category. Y'all are irrational to allow the deletion of Messiaen's category and then freak out over the deletion of similar categories proposed and unopposed during the deletion of Messiaen's category. If you can't see why I did it, it's because while you accuse me of ignoring process, you didn't bother to read the discussion that I used as my rationale before dismissing it. Keep in mind that I did not continue deleting or removing categories after the first objection was made. I may have been bold, but that's actually encouraged on Wikipedia. Believe me, I was not happy to be deleting a category structure that I spent a considerable amount of time building, but that's what the process indicated. Hyacinth ( talk) 21:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@ BrownHairedGirl: I would nominate the categories for deletion, so it could be discussed as you would like it to be, but that would require editing every category, so I am unwilling to do so. Why don't you? Hyacinth ( talk) 22:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
would nominate the categories for deletion, so it could be discussed as you would like it to be, but... but this misrepresents my position.
@ Praxidicae, BrownHairedGirl, and Deacon Vorbis: is there any reason Hyacinth isn't at RFAR by now ? This misuse of tools, failures to have suitable administrator accountability and battleground attitude from Hyacinth really needs a proper discussion by our beloved Arbitrators. Nick ( talk) 12:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Template:Perspectives of New Music has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 20:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Wolfram Alpha. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 16#Template:Wolfram Alpha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 03:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kalos. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19#Kalos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 04:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, Hyacinth, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have written a wide variety of articles about music and culture, including a number of biographies. It's good to see you now intend to devote more attention to women in music. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Ten simple rules and our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 08:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Some apples left for you, with thanks for all the music. See my talk today for an expressive image. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Ten years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:Pupils of Nadia Boulanger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_22#Category:Pupils_of_Nadia_Boulanger. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oculi ( talk) 16:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello Hyacinth, I noticed that you have Epilepsy and i wanted to know if you would like to add yourself to my category called Wikipedians with epilepsy which i made back in May. If so, please give me me a message back and i would like one day for all Wikipedians with Epilepsy to be add themselves to my category. D Eaketts ( talk) 19:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Native American musicians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohawk.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:Pupils of Nadia Boulanger has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi ( talk) 12:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for uploading File:World Eskimo Indian Olympics 2015 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:36, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikpedia:Sexist wikipedia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 15#Wikpedia:Sexist wikipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 18:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Jerome Kohl was on the Main page today, - he is remembered in friendship, as a positive influence as you said -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
bout references and citations when other people where about politics or aesthetics. Now one of the sanest voices on Wikipedia is gone, and the bias created by his absence will last forever. If that can't be acknowledged, then I do not wish to acknowledge his death but instead wish to remain silent. A candle burning in the dark of the night, and no one is allowed to say he's a candle, seems like the shittiest mourning I've ever seen, and I've been to hundreds of funerals (because of my mom). Hyacinth ( talk) 23:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, what happened here? I reverted the disruption to the IP's comment but I wasn't sure how to salvage the comment you added, so I just moved the ill-placed signature to the end. I hope you're doing OK. Nardog ( talk) 20:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
= https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Hyaitions acinth&action=submit
Hello, Hyacinth, You contributed an image (your own work): >Sequential modulation in Schubert's Piano Sonata in E Major, D. 459, movement III...< to <Modulation (music)> page. ery argument, th3n Wikipeida is not your place You took the music itself from a reputable source and, I guess, you provided the chord analysis to it. In this respect, please, note that there should be a capital "I" (and not "i") at the beginning of m. 4 of that sample, as it is C-major chord. (If the analysis came from the source, it's a mistake there :)) but we want it right here, don't we? Pathan K ( talk) 19:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Will you be able to re-do the image? If not, let me know. Cheers Pathan K
Template:Seizure warning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Natureium ( talk) 23:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Pop Toob has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)'s section for products. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here
06:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Category:Leonard Bloomfield Book Award authors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Template:String quartet compositions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. intforce ( talk) 14:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for uploading File:World Eskimo Indian Olympics 2015 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A tag has been placed on Category:Moroccan music video directors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am a PhD student at University College London (UK), researching the collective production of knowledge. Wikipedia is my main case study. Would you be able/willing to talk to me about your activity on Wikipedia?
I have submitted my project to the Wikipedia research committee for guidance. You can find the full summary here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Sociotechnical_epistemology:_how_do_we_foster_good_practices_in_collective_knowledge-production%3F
There's more on my user page and you can ask me any questions. We can discuss identification, uses of data and so forth before talking as well. If you're interested, you can contact me via my Talk page, or by emailing me at elena.falco.18@ucl.ac.uk
Thanks! ElenaFalco ( talk) 15:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:World Eskimo Indian Olympics 2015 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:World Eskimo Indian Olympics 2015 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:OCLC members has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 00:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Hyacinth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arnold Schoenberg Institute, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Music audio has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 08:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Category:International Musicological Society has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound object until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Acous mana 13:25, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Category:Société française de musicologie has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:16, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:2.82812 hyperbolic volume knots and links has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 12:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Hyacinth. Could you possibly look this at article? - with either online or paper - Groves possibly? Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 11:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Ordinarily, we don't. If you have a more specific objection, please post it at the bottom of the page, or at the appropriate section of the error section at the top (click WP:ERRORS). Those are the two reasons why I removed it. Art LaPella ( talk) 13:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Art LaPella: Good to know that after slandering people you pay attention to their rsponse. Hyacinth ( talk) 04:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by hyperbolic volume indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by Arf invariant indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by braid length indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by braid number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by bridge number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by crosscap number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by crossing number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by genus indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by stick number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by tunnel number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by unknotting number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Template:Membranophones: IT looks like you created it. Can you update it? Lembit Staan ( talk) 18:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Links by linking number requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
CfD closed as "delete" at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_July_29#Knots_and_links_by_knot_invariant
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jp× g 03:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Template:Order has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Star Wars The March of the Empire.mid. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Star Wars The March of the Empire.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 21:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Template:Capitalization has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Color wheel comparison has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 12:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Hyacinth, I see that you merged the Ultimate Wheel article into the Impossible Wheel article in May 2017. So far, I've only provided minor edits here on Wikipedia so I'm still learning the process, but the way the Impossible Wheel page reads now conflates two different (but related) devices. The impossible wheel (BC wheel) is not peddled, but the ultimate wheel is peddled. Neither is a sub-category of the other, though both could be considered sub-categories of the unicycle. And indeed, the Unicycle page has them both listed as "Other variations". I propose that we either undo the merging of ultimate wheel into impossible wheel or rename the page "Unicycle Variations" and include more info on both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmbradburn ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC) My apologies for failing to sign the previous entry. Rmbradburn ( talk) 02:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A token of thanks
Hi Hyacinth! I've
nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk ~~~~~
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. / Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anyone can edit and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#Anyone can edit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Respighi Trittico Botticelliano.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW1223( Howl at me/ My hunts) 23:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:MTV Video Music Award for Best Video with a Social Message footer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 05:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:Extended techniques has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Why? I Ask ( talk) 12:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Template:Awkward has been nominated for merging with Template:Copy edit inline. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 07:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
hey 2A00:F41:2CC3:DC09:B990:F3ED:FEEA:9F9C ( talk) 14:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Structural dissonance and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2#Structural dissonance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234 kb of .rar files ( is this dangerous?) 14:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedia requested musical instrument audio files has been nominated for speedy renaming to Category:Wikipedia requested audio of musical instruments. Please see WP:CFDS. – Fayenatic London 13:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:User guj-N indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:User templates kin indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:User templates sag indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:User guj indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I noticed you added to the cool example in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music examples#Technical_examples a caution "This example's MIDI is precluded by current Help:Score."
What is the problem with the Score extension? I think it works fine for MIDI, it plays for me and if you click the player's (i) symbol you can access the underlying MIDI file. There have certainly been problems, but the latest one I know of is phab:T306836, "Score audio players processed by videoJS are invisible" and was fixed in April and should have rolled out to wikis by now. If there's a problem this page should reference a bug and it should be mentioned in Help:Media (MIDI). (Also, the wiki link and text are swapped.) Or did you mean something else by "preclude"? Skierpage ( talk) 01:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:Interval vector has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 13:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Compound intervals indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The article I Hear America Singing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged for citations since 2011, fails WP:NBOOK. The linked source looks like a review, but is primary. I found mention of it in bibliographies of American songbooks, but not anything that supports WP:NBOOK.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
asilvering (
talk)
05:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:What wikipedia is and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 4#Wikipedia:What wikipedia is until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. F Adesdae 378 21:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hard color and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 29#Hard color until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect French world and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 30#French world until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 00:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Hyacinth. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC) |
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:Be bold and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#WP:Be bold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 35.139.154.158 ( talk) 20:26, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Apical consonants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Consonants by tongue shape indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StarWarsMainThemeSnippet.mid, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 09:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
The article List of musical pieces which use extended techniques has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The number of pieces that use extended techniques exploded in the twentieth century, making it impossible for us to make anything approaching a comprehensive list of such pieces. Even if it were possible, the list would be so cumbersome as to be useless.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 09:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Upbeat and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 21#Upbeat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 11:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Hyacinth! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC) |
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Cut and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 27#Template:Cut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:GKFX talk 21:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hyacinth,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
00:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 00:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Two images and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 20 § Template:Two images until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 02:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Society for Electro-Acoustic Music in the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not satisfy notability criteria and there are not enough secondary sources to reference.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh)
21:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I stumbled across the "Darling Nelly Gray" midi and png files on the Passomezzo moderno page. Thank you for creating the example in the first place. Unfortunately, there is a clef error on the first line; the accompaniment at that point should certainly be treble clef and not bass clef. This error is likewise audible in the midi example. The example also jumps ineloquently from 2 lines to 3, where the melody suddenly changes to another line, while the accompaniment expands from 1 line to 2. Perhaps you could revisit this example? Thank you in advance! /info/en/?search=File:Darling_Nelly_Gray_page_1.mid /info/en/?search=Passamezzo_moderno#/media/File:Darling_Nelly_Gray_page_1.png 2003:F1:C702:2A00:B803:6371:D12A:ED41 ( talk) 19:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Template:Use Harvard referencing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:User templates asha indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'd just like to say thanks for the various resources you've added re cross-rhythm and related topics. Cheers TimDuncan ( talk) 15:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
I was going to put the "notes smaller than quarter notes may be beamed together" info on that pic, but I'm not familiar with that template setup. Looks like maybe you created it and can figure it out (I'll just break the formatting if I stick my hands into this). - Special-T ( talk) 12:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
A cupcake for you! Happy wikibirthday! Salazarov 17:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC) |
I have no idea why I have your userpage on my watchlist, but they left this comment (clearly talk page material):
THERE IS AN ERROR IN YOUR DIAGRAM OF THE EULER GENUS AS YOU HAVE TWO G COMING OFF THE C BUT NO E OR 5/4 YOU SHOULD CORRECT AND THEN FEEL FREE TO DELETE THIS COMMENT
Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk 23:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you a lot for your sheet music photo contributions! حفيد المثنى ( talk) 17:20, 14 September 2023 (UTC) |
Happy Adminship | from the Birthday Committee |
---|---|
Wishing Hyacinth a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Cut fingering has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Cut fingering until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Hekt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 12 § Hekt until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Half-holing has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 19 § Half-holing until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Pokok has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 21 § Pokok until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Strike fingering has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § Strike fingering until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Category:Fictional musical instruments has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 17 § Category:Fictional musical instruments until a consensus is reached. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 06:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Template:Chicago style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Articles using Chicago style citation format indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Template:Prime form has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 18:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You are the author of these two templates. What is the distinction between them? Do we need two templates? {{
user pt-2}}
, for example, uses {{
user x}}
but appears to work if I change it to use {{
user x/doc}}
which is used by the majority of language user templates. There are only a handful of these template that use {{
user x}}
; ok to switch them to {{
user x/doc}}
?
— Trappist the monk ( talk) 23:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
{{
user x}}
and {{
user x/doc}}
but I don't think that those changes produce correct results. For example, compare:
{{
user x/doc}}
. Yesterday I changed the parameters supplied to {{
languages}}
in {{
user x/doc}}
to use
Module:ISO 639 name. There is a similar call to {{languages}}
in {{user x}}
; similar but not identical. Why?{{
user x}}
. What I got from you was changes to the two templates that were then reverted when I pointed out that the changes did not work. The changes and the reverts were accompanied by silence from you. Now, after I asked you about intentions, you chastise me for being uncivil. Thanks, but that isn't helpful so I'll noodle it out on my own.There are only a handful of these template that useI know now that it is ok to switch those few templates to{{ user x}}
; ok to switch them to{{ user x/doc}}
?
{{user x/doc}}
because that has been done.{{User x}}
reads:{{User x/doc}}
, which reads:Again, what's the problem? Hyacinth ( talk) 20:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
{{
user x}}
exists and is for the most part unused and contains code that more-or-less duplicates the code in {{
user x/doc}}
, probably nothing any longer. It would seem to me that the correct path forward is to move {{
user x/doc}}
to {{
user x doc}}
because that is the function performed by the template; {{
user x doc/doc}}
becomes the documentation page for {{user x doc}}
. The
language user templates are all modified to use {{user x doc}}
. {{user x}}
and {{user x/doc}}
can be deleted or re-purposed.@
Trappist the monk: Hi folks.
User:The Earwig alerted me to this discussion. I recently synched
Template:User x/doc to
Template:User x. I am now proposing to run a bot to change the parameter in the relevant transclusions of
Template:Documentation from Template:User x/doc
to Template:User x
. The proposal is at
Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BsherrAWBBOT 2. After all transclusions have been changed, I will move the "noinclude" contents from the base page to the doc subpage, and add {{
Documentation}} in their place. I invite your comments here or there. Thanks very much. --
Bsherr (
talk)
15:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hyacinth. It's great that you wrote up an excerpt of Maple Leaf Rag, but please correct the time signature when you have a chance. It should be 2/4 (2 quarter note beats per measure), not 4/2 (4 half note beats per measure).
All the best,
Ikan Kekek ( talk) 08:41, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:A Hard Day's Night melody.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:22, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Equivalence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equivalence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwirkle ( talk) 06:13, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
7&6=thirteen (
☎) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 14:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anyone can edit. Since you had some involvement with the Anyone can edit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf ( talk) 17:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Food issue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is way too broad to be a disambiguation page, and is not a useful technical term as an article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)
17:19, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Food issue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Food issue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hyacinth. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Weekly television shows, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat ( talk) 00:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dizzy's Business Major seventh chord.mid. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:30, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dizzy's Business Major seventh chord.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:30, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Charlie Parker - Au Privave - circle progression dominant seventh.mid. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:26, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Charlie Parker - Au Privave - circle progression dominant seventh.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:27, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Hyacinth. Thank you for your file on Commons. Please could you add this for french anacrouse : Début de Valet will ich dir geben, BWV 736. L'anacrouse est notée en rouge. Regards, -- Sidonie61 ( talk) 01:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal headings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 11:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal comments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 11:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal summaries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 11:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal headings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 14:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal comments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 14:37, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:No personal summaries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [ Username Needed 14:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Tristan chord as dominant with appoggiaturas Chailley.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Parenthetical referencing and WP:CITEVAR. All of the references in Osgood curve are cited, with in-text parenthetical references for the ones where it makes sense to name the author as part of the article text and footnotes for the rest. — David Eppstein ( talk) 06:13, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Free reeds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 16:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Please have a look at the new section I added to Talk:Degree_(music), following your modification of the first example. — Hucbald.SaintAmand ( talk) 11:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing secondary dominant.mid. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 21:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing secondary dominant.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 21:18, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Administrators
must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:16, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, - Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Nearly a decade ago, in Harmonic seventh chord, you added this quote from Gage Averill's book: "There's a chord in a barbershop that makes the nerve ends tingle....We might all our chord a Super-Seventh!" Is that second sentence a typo, for "We might call our chord..."? I don't see how else to understand it, but didn't want to change a quote without checking the source. Rigadoun (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Greetings. Your nice score excerpt from Ludus Tonalis was converted a couple of years ago by DatBot to a much smaller file that unfortunately lost too much resolution. You’ll see now there are staff lines and stems missing. I don’t know what the best solution is, but I wanted to bring it to your attention. MJ ( t • c) 17:21, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
That should have been sufficient, but the bot ambushed it again a few days later. I wrote a query at the bot’s talk page. If you were to just revert to the previous version, would the bot do it again? MJ ( t • c) 15:19, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
@ DatGuy, Mark R Johnson, and Jerome Kohl: I wonder what the criteria which triggers DatBot to "Reduce size of non-free image". Size isn't even mentioned at W:NFCC. A brief explanation of DatBot is found at User:DatBot, but presumably DatBot would be more helpful and easier to understand if it explained how it works more fully (since the page it cites, W:NFCC, does not). Hyacinth ( talk) 23:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
@ Mark R Johnson: The "File history" does not have clickable "revert" buttons. Hyacinth ( talk) 00:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Bouchard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bouchard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder ( talk) 20:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Accademia Musicale Chigiana International Prize winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Ignore all consequences. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Ignore all consequences redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:26, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited L-system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parallel ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:05, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Template:Purpose needed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 17:04, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Category:Kenneth L. Hale Award recipients, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:25, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
Category:Victoria A. Fromkin Lifetime Service Award recipients, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:38, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Figuration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Figure ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:42, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
In your music example for "Ostinato for Radiohead's 'Creep'..." you have chord symbols above 4 triads of tied whole notes, "G+, B+, C+, C-". I'm not sure why you used the "+" sign, as that is generally notation for an augmented triad, not a major one. The actual notes below are all major chords, not augmented, so this is wrong, or at least misleading.
Although a minus "-" sign is often used (but not recommended by notation experts) to indicate "minor", and the last chord is indeed a minor triad, the more conventional symbol is a lower-case "m". I trust you will understand my concern. I feel the notation line should be more like this: "G B C Cm".
Shermanbay ( talk) 11:17, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Shermanbay
Hyacinth, you redirected Minkowski island to Koch snowflake. No doubt they are connected, but the page does not mention Minkowski island. The only page the does, besides the original redirect, is Fractal antenna where there is a picture. Spinning Spark 17:49, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Please look up the definition of "depreciated" (meaning decreased in monetary value) and "deprecated" (meaning no longer supported by software). I will fix your new category names. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 04:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Should Category:Depreciated Portal:Literature pages be moved to Category:Deprecated Portal:Literature pages (since it contains, "pages that...have since been removed or replaced," and not pages which are cheaper than they used to be)? Hyacinth ( talk) 04:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Hyacinth, your deletion of Minkowski island is entirely out of process. Please restore it. It is unbecoming of an administrator to use the tools in a content dispute. Spinning Spark 18:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Is there anything that I could do for you, such as tedious tiny edits to multiple pages or the creation of images? For instance, I could create an image to demonstrate different construction methods leading to the same result (although, how does one tell from an image if someone is adding onto a figure and then shrinking the results, if they are cutting away from a figure, or if they are using rewrite rules?). Hyacinth ( talk) 22:56, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
@ Spinningspark: The lead to the article, Koch snowflake, in which you claimed in an edit summary that, "We don't normally call for etys, that's something for Wiktionary," contains the etymology of "Koch snowflake":
The Mandelbrot set lead contains etymology:
The Julia set lead contains etymology for both "Julia set" and "Fatou set":
Who did you mean when you said "we"? Hyacinth ( talk) 23:57, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Compositions by genre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Steven (Editor) ( talk) 01:27, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Template:Patience has been nominated for merging with Template:Solitaire. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Lord Belbury ( talk) 11:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Partial is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partial until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Banana Sprite challenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banana Sprite challenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SpicyMilkBoy ( talk) 02:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Category:Linguistics, Language, and the Public Award recipients, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 09:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
I found your Wikipedia:Mostly negative essay and I think it is great for identifying a bias in Wikipedia's design which we need to counter somehow to be more encouraging. Thanks for that. Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:32, 11 December 2019 (UTC) |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Musical object. Since you had some involvement with the Musical object redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 17:37, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
00:05, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
@ Deacon Vorbis: Okay, [please] convince me: Why is an accusation without support or links a better edit summary than a copy and paste given Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Clearly if I add a comment to a talk page readers can tell I did so whether I write in my edit summary "added comment" or if I copy and paste a comment with a signature. If you convince me then I will become ardent. You have witnessed this, if not realized it: you convince me that an article should have more links and then I add more links but if you convince me an article should have less links then I remove more links. You may have found this confusing, and I can only assume this is because most editors are not as flexible and easy to convince as I am so you have interpreted my reactions as jokes or making a point (as me disagreeing with you when actually I changed my mind and agreed with you). If you care enough to complain, then I hope that you care enough to convince, and I am relatively easily convincible. Hyacinth ( talk) 23:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Overhand knot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Half knot ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 15:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Quality measure. Since you had some involvement with the Quality measure redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hildeoc ( talk) 18:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Age appropriateness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Age appropriateness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn ( talk) 09:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello--
I have a question about the image you created of the Harmonic Series--curious how you made it, also if you would be willing to create a higher resolution version without the guidelines? Apologies if this is not the proper way to ask but I could not find other contact information for you. Would appreciate any response and happy to take offline if you prefer. Thank you!
Adam.masser ( talk) 03:15, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Candy Ken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 14:41, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Hyacinth
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mccapra and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Subjugation, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mccapra}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mccapra ( talk) 22:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Tactile illusions has been nominated for merging with Template:Optical illusions. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES ( talk) 13:59, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Temporal illusions has been nominated for merging with Template:Optical illusions. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES ( talk) 14:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Auditory illusions has been nominated for merging with Template:Optical illusions. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES ( talk) 14:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Category:Unmovable pages, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — andrybak ( talk) 20:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Template:Can't move has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — andrybak ( talk) 20:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Michael Byron (composer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dramonline.org/albums/michael-byron-dreamers-of-pearl/notes. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Java Hurricane 05:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I just recently created a English Virginalist School template. I've noticed it is very similar to your Renaissance music manuscript sources one. Would you be open to the deletion of the Renaissance music manuscript sources one? Or do you think that's unnecessary and the Renaissance music manuscripts could have both templates on their pages? An English Virginalist School members template was needed and I thought it made sense to put the content from Renaissance music manuscript sources in it, as it's not like there are thousands of collections of virginal/virginalist music. Thanks, Aza24 ( talk) 08:30, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
The article Richard Middleton (musicologist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:N
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Kthxbay (
talk)
20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I see that you uploaded files of riffs from " You Really Got Me" and " Iron Man (song)". I nominated them for discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 5, where I invite you to discuss them. -- George Ho ( talk) 07:38, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Michael Byron (composer) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
This article was deleted at AfD. If you disagree you need to ask for a review at WP:DRV. You can't just unilaterally restore it yourself. Please revert your restoration and follow the consensus process. – bradv 🍁 20:39, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Can you please explain this edit for an editor who as far as I can tell has never edited the article that's at DRV? Praxidicae ( talk) 21:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect I Got Your Ice Cold Nugrape. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#I Got Your Ice Cold Nugrape until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 01:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nugrape Twins. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 12#Nugrape Twins until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 01:15, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Byron (composer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Byron (composer) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 07:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:Pupils of Nadia Boulanger has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. b uidh e 05:11, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:Pupils of Olivier Messiaen has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. b uidh e 15:50, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hyacinth, I have a question about {{ Use Harvard referencing}}. I have encountered a number of pages that use mixed citation styles, including shortened footnote templates that link to full citations as well has plain text shortened footnotes that use the name, date, & page format to refer to but not to link to full citations. I was wondering if you meant for Template:Use Harvard referencing to indicate that all references should use Harvard referencing or to note that some citations use Harvard referencing, or that there is an opportunity to use Harvard referencing, within a given article. Peaceray ( talk) 16:55, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:Ars nova and subtilior has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 05:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Template:Renaissance music manuscript English sources has been nominated for merging with Template:English Virginalist School. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Aza24 ( talk) 23:00, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear Hyacinth,
I first have to apologize for this rather anonymous reaction. It is because I'm not a Wikipedian, although sometimes tempted but then again deciding to protect myself from getting addicted, and also from all the negativity as mentioned in your own essay. In addition I don't know if this is the right way to approach you with my question, but I could not find an Email address. So please forgive the nuisance of finding my issue here.
My question is about this sentence: "The timbre of a single reed instrument is related to the harmonic series, while the timbre of a double reed instrument includes only the odd harmonics since the two reeds alternately touch each other and separate while vibrating, thus cancelling out the even harmonics, and this may be compared to the timbre of a square wave." which you added in the introduction of the Wikipedia article on "Double reed" /info/en/?search=Double_reed
From Reference #2 ( https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Reed_Instruments) and also from material on the Music Acoustics site of the University of New South Wales, Sydney, (see https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/flutes.v.clarinets.html and https://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/jw/pipes.html ) I got the impression that the bores of the one-sided closed pipe being cylindrical or conical are responsible for the suppression, or not, of the even harmonics, and not whether the air is blown through a single or a double reed. And actually this leads to the opposite conclusion, namely that the clarinet with a single reed gives mainly odd harmonics.
I was just reading these UNSW articles a few days ago which triggered my interest. The explanation with the two touching reeds 'sounds' ;) to me not very convincing, but I have to admit that I also not fully understand the reasoning in the Australian papers.
So I'm still puzzled and was wondering if you can elaborate a bit more on this, and/or give some more context to the argument given in the present article.
Kind regards, Ben Smith -- 145.69.103.132 ( talk) 02:06, 12 June 2020 (UTC) (ben dot smith at telfort dot nl)
I quote:
Flue-pipes may be either "stopped" or "open". In a stopped pipe, the end remote from the mouth is closed by a tight-fitting stopper. There can be no motion of the air here, so that this end of the pipe is necessarily a node, while the mouth, at which there can be no variations of pressure, is a loop. Thus the possible modes of free vibration for the air inside a stopped pipe are those shewn in the above scheme (fig. 4).
For the first mode of vibration, the wave-length is four times the length of the pipe. This gives the fundamental note of the pipe. For the second mode, the wave-length is only a third of that of the fundamental mode, so that the frequency is three times that of the fundamental, and the note sounded is the third harmonic of the fundamental. The other modes of vibration sound the fifth, the seventh, the ninth harmonic, and so on. Thus a stopped pipe emits odd-numbered harmonics only, like a string plucked at its middle point.
If we now remove the stopper from the pipe, we shall find that the pipe emits the even-numbered harmonics only, the odd-numbered harmonics disappearing as soon as the stopper is withdrawn. The reason for this is that the open end of the pipe is no longer a node, but has become a loop because the pressure is that of the outside air. The scheme of vibration is now that shewn in fig. 49.
If we forget that our pipe ever had the stopper in it, we shall think that the top vibration (marked 2) as the fundamental note of the open pipe, although it is of course the octave of the fundamental note of the stopped pipe. The other modes of vibration (marked 4, 6, 8, etc.) now appear as the second, third, fourth, etc., harmonics of this new fundamental note, so that the pipe is sound all the harmonics of its own fundamental note.
This, however, is approximately true. In the first place, the open end of the pipe is not exactly a loop...
In the second place, it is even less legitimate to treat the mouth of the pipe as a loop.
— Jean, James (1937/1968/). Science & Music, p.137-9. Cambridge (1937) and then Dover, New York (1968). ISBN 0-486-61964-8.
Hyacinth ( talk) 02:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Jerome Kohl: Now the question is why does a conical bore act like a stopper when it's not a stopper? Hyacinth ( talk) 18:32, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for
this edit to Wikipedia "
Double reed". I came to the article because the edit caused the article to be placed into
Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica without Wikisource reference. This is because there is a special parameter called "wstitle
" which replaces "title
" in templates like {{
cite EB1911}}
. All you need to do to use it is to place Wikisource article name as an argument for wstitle like this:
{{cite EB1911 |wstitle=Reed Instruments}}
The full citation looks like this:
{{EB1911 |last=Schlesinger |first=Kathleen |wstitle=Reed Instruments |volume=22 |page=974}}
Which looks like this:
Schlesinger, Kathleen (1911). Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 22 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 974.. In
In addition the section
WP:FREECOPYING in the
Wikipedia:Plagiarism guideline was written to handle importing text from public domain text--which EB1911 is because of its age-- so instead of importing a a paragraph of text from EB1911 as a quote you can simply copy it and then add an attribution by removing the "cite
" at the start of the citation:
Here is some copied from EB1911 ({{EB1911|inline=1 |wstitle=Reed Instruments}})
Here is some copied from EB1911 (public domain: " Reed Instruments". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). 1911.)
One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in theThe parameter inline=1 is added if the citation is inline, because it changes the wording of the attribution slightly from that used if the reference in in a references section. You will find a more detailed explanation in the documentation included in the templates {{
cite EB1911}}
and {{
EB1911}}
. BTW there are a lot of these template pairs available for linking citations to Wikisource eg {{
DNB}}
and {{
cite DNB}}
The reason for simply including text from Public Domain (PD) sources and not quoting them is that the often archaic or floury Edwardian wording can be updated in the usual Wikipedia way -- something that can not be done if it is quoted.
If anything I have written is not clear or I can be of help in any other way please leave a message on my talk page. -- PBS ( talk) 12:34, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
As this conversation may need third parties to join in I have copied what I think are the pertinant paragraphs to Talk:Double reed. I have also asked you an aditional question there about inline citations. -- PBS ( talk) 07:57, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Please share your email address for contact. Please Hyacinth fandom ( talk) 13:08, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Category:Coxeter plane graphs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 16:07, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Template:Music eras has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aza24 ( talk) 04:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Dear Hyacinth/October 17, 2018 - June 23, 2024,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 17:04, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 9 equal temperament. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 1#9 equal temperament until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 14:23, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 10 equal temperament. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 1#10 equal temperament until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 14:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Could you add a reference for your addition here? TIA. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect French Words and Phrases. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 6#French Words and Phrases until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
Template:Extended techniques has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Why? I Ask ( talk) 06:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Template:Use Harvard referencing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Francis Schonken ( talk) 11:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Population density, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Standing stock.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 07:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:PDF. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 3#Wikipedia:PDF until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Out-of-process category deletions by user:Hyacinth. Thank you.. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 12:22, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
made [your] edits based on precedence.
@ BrownHairedGirl and Praxidicae: buidhe said, "I am starting to wonder if most or all of the daughter cats of Category:All music pupils by teacher are nondefining," and none of the comments specify Messiaen as the only invalid category. Y'all are irrational to allow the deletion of Messiaen's category and then freak out over the deletion of similar categories proposed and unopposed during the deletion of Messiaen's category. If you can't see why I did it, it's because while you accuse me of ignoring process, you didn't bother to read the discussion that I used as my rationale before dismissing it. Keep in mind that I did not continue deleting or removing categories after the first objection was made. I may have been bold, but that's actually encouraged on Wikipedia. Believe me, I was not happy to be deleting a category structure that I spent a considerable amount of time building, but that's what the process indicated. Hyacinth ( talk) 21:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@ BrownHairedGirl: I would nominate the categories for deletion, so it could be discussed as you would like it to be, but that would require editing every category, so I am unwilling to do so. Why don't you? Hyacinth ( talk) 22:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
would nominate the categories for deletion, so it could be discussed as you would like it to be, but... but this misrepresents my position.
@ Praxidicae, BrownHairedGirl, and Deacon Vorbis: is there any reason Hyacinth isn't at RFAR by now ? This misuse of tools, failures to have suitable administrator accountability and battleground attitude from Hyacinth really needs a proper discussion by our beloved Arbitrators. Nick ( talk) 12:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Template:Perspectives of New Music has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Deacon Vorbis ( carbon • videos) 20:32, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Wolfram Alpha. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 16#Template:Wolfram Alpha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 03:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kalos. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19#Kalos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 04:19, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, Hyacinth, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have written a wide variety of articles about music and culture, including a number of biographies. It's good to see you now intend to devote more attention to women in music. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Ten simple rules and our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 08:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Some apples left for you, with thanks for all the music. See my talk today for an expressive image. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Ten years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:Pupils of Nadia Boulanger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_May_22#Category:Pupils_of_Nadia_Boulanger. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Oculi ( talk) 16:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello Hyacinth, I noticed that you have Epilepsy and i wanted to know if you would like to add yourself to my category called Wikipedians with epilepsy which i made back in May. If so, please give me me a message back and i would like one day for all Wikipedians with Epilepsy to be add themselves to my category. D Eaketts ( talk) 19:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Native American musicians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohawk.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:Pupils of Nadia Boulanger has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi ( talk) 12:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for uploading File:World Eskimo Indian Olympics 2015 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:36, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikpedia:Sexist wikipedia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 15#Wikpedia:Sexist wikipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 18:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Jerome Kohl was on the Main page today, - he is remembered in friendship, as a positive influence as you said -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
bout references and citations when other people where about politics or aesthetics. Now one of the sanest voices on Wikipedia is gone, and the bias created by his absence will last forever. If that can't be acknowledged, then I do not wish to acknowledge his death but instead wish to remain silent. A candle burning in the dark of the night, and no one is allowed to say he's a candle, seems like the shittiest mourning I've ever seen, and I've been to hundreds of funerals (because of my mom). Hyacinth ( talk) 23:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, what happened here? I reverted the disruption to the IP's comment but I wasn't sure how to salvage the comment you added, so I just moved the ill-placed signature to the end. I hope you're doing OK. Nardog ( talk) 20:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
= https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Hyaitions acinth&action=submit
Hello, Hyacinth, You contributed an image (your own work): >Sequential modulation in Schubert's Piano Sonata in E Major, D. 459, movement III...< to <Modulation (music)> page. ery argument, th3n Wikipeida is not your place You took the music itself from a reputable source and, I guess, you provided the chord analysis to it. In this respect, please, note that there should be a capital "I" (and not "i") at the beginning of m. 4 of that sample, as it is C-major chord. (If the analysis came from the source, it's a mistake there :)) but we want it right here, don't we? Pathan K ( talk) 19:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Will you be able to re-do the image? If not, let me know. Cheers Pathan K
Template:Seizure warning has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Natureium ( talk) 23:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Pop Toob has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies)'s section for products. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
reply here
06:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Category:Leonard Bloomfield Book Award authors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:09, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Template:String quartet compositions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. intforce ( talk) 14:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for uploading File:World Eskimo Indian Olympics 2015 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:07, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A tag has been placed on Category:Moroccan music video directors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:24, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am a PhD student at University College London (UK), researching the collective production of knowledge. Wikipedia is my main case study. Would you be able/willing to talk to me about your activity on Wikipedia?
I have submitted my project to the Wikipedia research committee for guidance. You can find the full summary here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Sociotechnical_epistemology:_how_do_we_foster_good_practices_in_collective_knowledge-production%3F
There's more on my user page and you can ask me any questions. We can discuss identification, uses of data and so forth before talking as well. If you're interested, you can contact me via my Talk page, or by emailing me at elena.falco.18@ucl.ac.uk
Thanks! ElenaFalco ( talk) 15:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:World Eskimo Indian Olympics 2015 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:World Eskimo Indian Olympics 2015 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:OCLC members has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 00:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Hyacinth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arnold Schoenberg Institute, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Music audio has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 08:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Category:International Musicological Society has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:34, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound object until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Acous mana 13:25, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Category:Société française de musicologie has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:16, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:2.82812 hyperbolic volume knots and links has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 12:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Hyacinth. Could you possibly look this at article? - with either online or paper - Groves possibly? Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 11:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Ordinarily, we don't. If you have a more specific objection, please post it at the bottom of the page, or at the appropriate section of the error section at the top (click WP:ERRORS). Those are the two reasons why I removed it. Art LaPella ( talk) 13:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Art LaPella: Good to know that after slandering people you pay attention to their rsponse. Hyacinth ( talk) 04:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by hyperbolic volume indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by Arf invariant indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by braid length indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:46, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by braid number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by bridge number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by crosscap number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by crossing number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by genus indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by stick number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by tunnel number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Knots and links by unknotting number indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Template:Membranophones: IT looks like you created it. Can you update it? Lembit Staan ( talk) 18:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Links by linking number requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
CfD closed as "delete" at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_July_29#Knots_and_links_by_knot_invariant
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jp× g 03:08, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Template:Order has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Star Wars The March of the Empire.mid. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Star Wars The March of the Empire.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 21:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Template:Capitalization has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:Color wheel comparison has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 12:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Hyacinth, I see that you merged the Ultimate Wheel article into the Impossible Wheel article in May 2017. So far, I've only provided minor edits here on Wikipedia so I'm still learning the process, but the way the Impossible Wheel page reads now conflates two different (but related) devices. The impossible wheel (BC wheel) is not peddled, but the ultimate wheel is peddled. Neither is a sub-category of the other, though both could be considered sub-categories of the unicycle. And indeed, the Unicycle page has them both listed as "Other variations". I propose that we either undo the merging of ultimate wheel into impossible wheel or rename the page "Unicycle Variations" and include more info on both. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmbradburn ( talk • contribs) 21:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC) My apologies for failing to sign the previous entry. Rmbradburn ( talk) 02:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A token of thanks
Hi Hyacinth! I've
nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk ~~~~~
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. / Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anyone can edit and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#Anyone can edit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf ( talk) 15:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Respighi Trittico Botticelliano.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW1223( Howl at me/ My hunts) 23:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:MTV Video Music Award for Best Video with a Social Message footer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 05:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Template:Extended techniques has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Why? I Ask ( talk) 12:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Template:Awkward has been nominated for merging with Template:Copy edit inline. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym ( talk) 07:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
hey 2A00:F41:2CC3:DC09:B990:F3ED:FEEA:9F9C ( talk) 14:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Structural dissonance and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2#Structural dissonance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234 kb of .rar files ( is this dangerous?) 14:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedia requested musical instrument audio files has been nominated for speedy renaming to Category:Wikipedia requested audio of musical instruments. Please see WP:CFDS. – Fayenatic London 13:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:User guj-N indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:User templates kin indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:User templates sag indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:47, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:User guj indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I noticed you added to the cool example in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music examples#Technical_examples a caution "This example's MIDI is precluded by current Help:Score."
What is the problem with the Score extension? I think it works fine for MIDI, it plays for me and if you click the player's (i) symbol you can access the underlying MIDI file. There have certainly been problems, but the latest one I know of is phab:T306836, "Score audio players processed by videoJS are invisible" and was fixed in April and should have rolled out to wikis by now. If there's a problem this page should reference a bug and it should be mentioned in Help:Media (MIDI). (Also, the wiki link and text are swapped.) Or did you mean something else by "preclude"? Skierpage ( talk) 01:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:Interval vector has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 13:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Compound intervals indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
The article I Hear America Singing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Tagged for citations since 2011, fails WP:NBOOK. The linked source looks like a review, but is primary. I found mention of it in bibliographies of American songbooks, but not anything that supports WP:NBOOK.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
asilvering (
talk)
05:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:What wikipedia is and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 4#Wikipedia:What wikipedia is until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. F Adesdae 378 21:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hard color and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 29#Hard color until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect French world and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 30#French world until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 00:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Hyacinth. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC) |
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:Be bold and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 17#WP:Be bold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 35.139.154.158 ( talk) 20:26, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Apical consonants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Consonants by tongue shape indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StarWarsMainThemeSnippet.mid, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 09:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
The article List of musical pieces which use extended techniques has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The number of pieces that use extended techniques exploded in the twentieth century, making it impossible for us to make anything approaching a comprehensive list of such pieces. Even if it were possible, the list would be so cumbersome as to be useless.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 09:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Upbeat and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 21#Upbeat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 11:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Hyacinth! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC) |
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Cut and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 27#Template:Cut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:GKFX talk 21:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hyacinth,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡
00:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 00:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Two images and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 20 § Template:Two images until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 02:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Society for Electro-Acoustic Music in the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not satisfy notability criteria and there are not enough secondary sources to reference.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh)
21:03, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I stumbled across the "Darling Nelly Gray" midi and png files on the Passomezzo moderno page. Thank you for creating the example in the first place. Unfortunately, there is a clef error on the first line; the accompaniment at that point should certainly be treble clef and not bass clef. This error is likewise audible in the midi example. The example also jumps ineloquently from 2 lines to 3, where the melody suddenly changes to another line, while the accompaniment expands from 1 line to 2. Perhaps you could revisit this example? Thank you in advance! /info/en/?search=File:Darling_Nelly_Gray_page_1.mid /info/en/?search=Passamezzo_moderno#/media/File:Darling_Nelly_Gray_page_1.png 2003:F1:C702:2A00:B803:6371:D12A:ED41 ( talk) 19:11, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Template:Use Harvard referencing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:User templates asha indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I'd just like to say thanks for the various resources you've added re cross-rhythm and related topics. Cheers TimDuncan ( talk) 15:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
I was going to put the "notes smaller than quarter notes may be beamed together" info on that pic, but I'm not familiar with that template setup. Looks like maybe you created it and can figure it out (I'll just break the formatting if I stick my hands into this). - Special-T ( talk) 12:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
A cupcake for you! Happy wikibirthday! Salazarov 17:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC) |
I have no idea why I have your userpage on my watchlist, but they left this comment (clearly talk page material):
THERE IS AN ERROR IN YOUR DIAGRAM OF THE EULER GENUS AS YOU HAVE TWO G COMING OFF THE C BUT NO E OR 5/4 YOU SHOULD CORRECT AND THEN FEEL FREE TO DELETE THIS COMMENT
Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk 23:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you a lot for your sheet music photo contributions! حفيد المثنى ( talk) 17:20, 14 September 2023 (UTC) |
Happy Adminship | from the Birthday Committee |
---|---|
Wishing Hyacinth a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! |
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Cut fingering has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 8 § Cut fingering until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 21:32, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Hekt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 12 § Hekt until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 07:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Half-holing has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 19 § Half-holing until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 01:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Pokok has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 21 § Pokok until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 22:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Strike fingering has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § Strike fingering until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Category:Fictional musical instruments has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 17 § Category:Fictional musical instruments until a consensus is reached. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 06:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Template:Chicago style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 08:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Articles using Chicago style citation format indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Template:Prime form has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 18:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)