This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
Congratulations on your decision to semi-retire, I hope the reason is a happy one. If you happen to be able to spare any attention to the hrwiki evidence gathering pages on Meta while they're still active it will be very welcome and appreciated, but thanks in no small part to your experience and judgment, I believe, with some trepidation, that I've learned enough to see them through to completion. It's been a pleasure working with you, and I'd like to extend my immense thanks for your work and initiative, along with my best wishes for an enjoyable Wiki-semi-retirement! 😎 – Miranche T C 18:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
I hope you will not decide against retiring altogether, the work you have done here is tremendous, I think you are an excellent editor with a head much cooler than mine, and good people like you are in short supply on Wikipedia. I would certainly be sorry to see you go. I just hope your decision has nothing to do with the whole hr.wiki affair as it is frankly not really worth it. Cheers man. Timbouctou ( talk) 21:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
– SJ + 21:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I am conducting a survey of most active Wikipedians, regarding reasons they may reduce their activity. I would be very interested in having you participate in it. Would you be interested? (If you reply to me here, please WP:ECHO me). Thank you for your consideration, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Here's the applicable part of the survey (Questions 1-3 are for editors who have not reduced their activity, so I am skipping them as to not waste your time):
Question 4. Chose one answer which BEST describes the reason you have reduced your contributions: a) because of new commitments (job, family, another hobby) or health reasons b) because of unpleasant atmosphere, conflict with other editors, or lack of respect c) because of being overworked with Wikipedia needs d) feeling undervalued e) other (please elaborate):
Question 5. Do you agree with the following statement (YES or NO): a) some of the most stressful moments in my life were related to my involvement with Wikipedia
Question 6. On a scale of 1-5, how likely are you to start contributing again (or return to your peak activity levels)? (1=Never, 5=Definitely, it's just a matter of time)
Question 7. If you would like to elaborate on the reasons you reduced your contributions, dispute that claim, suggest reforms to Wikipedia that would make it a better place for you to edit, or provide any other comments (including links to Wikipedia pages), please include them below. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Hvala na odgovor, I tried copying your template but it's just showing a red link but whatever it's cool though Zastavafan76 ( talk) 22:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Opet velika hvala! Zastavafan76 ( talk) 00:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, i just found out you recently rated an article, i am the main contributor of, as "at least start class." What was missing for a "C-rating" other than the missing picture? Thanks, by a rather inexperienced user. Rka001 ( talk) 13:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Our Lady of Sinj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mehmed Pasha ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tramontane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levante ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Regarding [1], this was live for three years so there's little point in outright removing it now; I archived it instead. It was not an insulting discussion as such (unlike the previous one). -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 07:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Studenci, Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamešnica ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
You need to add a modicum of justification somewhere on that article and/or its talk page... the lead section still uses the Croatian spelling and the talk page is empty. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 11:33, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
I would appreciate your help with copy editing of Leftist errors.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 15:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi! What are you trying to do at Wikipedia:WikiProject Croatia/Frame? Does it have anything to do with the tabbed page design discussed at WT:CRO a while ago? Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 13:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
ona prava bosanska baklava :D :D WikiLite91 ( talk) 00:30, 12 April 2014 (UTC) |
Hi! Could you please take a look at the Croatia-Serbia border dispute in terms of B-class assessment and I'm not entirely sure if there should ba a hyphen or an ndash in the article title (please move accordingly if necessary). Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 23:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to redo that edit, go ahead, but do the same for all the analogous items. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 21:26, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Happy holidays and enjoy Wikipedia:WikiProject Croatia/News and alerts. Be sure to let me know how do you like that page.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 23:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
There's redlinked "showcase" link in the navigation. I thought to have User:JL-Bot maintain an automated listing of recognised content. One such listing maintained by the bot is available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Balkan military history task force#Article statistics. Cheers.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 09:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirko Kovač ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
I just noticed that interesting discussion you had on WP Croatia over minority languages. I have two questions.
Firstly, I noticed you said that it is fine to add minority names in infobox of municipalities and settlements that officially introduced bilingualism/multilingualism. Let me explain, I mean specifically municipalities that take step to introduce bilingualism, not just municipalities that are obliged to do so under Constitutional law but maybe still did not (Plus I would exclude Vukovar until we get final picture). It would be municipalities like Borovo or Kneževi Vinogradi. I know that the user DIRECTOR make big issue about that last time, but does this last discussion shows that his position does not enjoy majority support of community?
Second question is if someone can add section "official languages" into infobox settlement as I improvised in article Trpinja?-- MirkoS18 ( talk) 13:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I was wondering if you might be interested in resources offered by the Wikipedia Library and I thought to drop you a note that they're granting access to various otherwise paid resources for free at Wikipedia:TWL.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 10:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
I've replied to your message over there (just in case you aren't watching that page) -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 19:52, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sanja RTL Televizija.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I had created a list of Top 10 WP:CRO DYK articles before my last block. If you think this is useful, please copy it somewhere so I can delete the content from my subpage. Timbouctou ( talk) 12:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Category:Specific-source templates by country, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
On 4 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Savo Zlatić, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Savo Zlatić took up chess composition while imprisoned, using chess pieces made of bread? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Savo Zlatić. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 23:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Great job promoting Savo Zlatić to the Main Page. The hook you proposed was great. Keep up the good work! ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎) 03:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC) |
Congrats on the DYK. Have you considered a GAN? Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 09:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you seem to be a smart and cool-headed editor. There is a page similar to the Shaitsu page, with many of the same contributors, and some similar debates. Seems to be a group that is split strongly between pro-altmed and Skeptic or anti-altmed viewpoints. A few more neutral voices would be helpful. Like Shiatsu, it's a challenge to keep a neutral, encyclopedic tone. Would you mind watchlisting this page: Rolfing, and if the mood strikes you, chime in? I hear that you are semi-retired so I'm sure you have plenty on your plate, so I would really appreciate it. Thanks!-- Karinpower ( talk) 22:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello again GregorB, I have appreciated your input in the past and especially that you seem to have a neutral yet educated point of view. I humbly request your assistance again. Three new Skeptic sources have been added to the Rolfing article; all 3 of these sources only mention the word "Rolfing" once, and only in a long list of alternative medicine topics. In each case, the author is making a blanket complaint about alt-med (though the grouping is quite different in each of the sources), and there is no specific information or criticism about Rolfing provided. The Skeptic's Dictionary is already cited, which is a much better Skeptic source, offering a full page of information and several specific criticisms. I believe these three new sources should be disallowed as they don't add anything about Rolfing. However, I am outnumbered as the editors on this page tend to favor a Skeptic source regardless of its quality. I realize this comes down to policy rather than a simple "vote" but a few more voices, and perhaps different opinions, would help. Everything is civil but I don't think we are going to be able to reach consensus on this matter. Thank you in advance!-- Karinpower ( talk) 22:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nenad Bach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nenad Bach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Cwobeel (talk) 00:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, GregorB! FYI: The following has been proposed on Talk:Sportsperson:
I currently have no opinion on which way to go, however, there is some discussion regarding the "athletics" vs. "track and field" issue that we've stumbled over previously. Cheers! Location ( talk) 06:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Imas email od mene. Pozdrav! -- Kolega2357 ( talk) 15:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi GregorB.
I just created an article about Paškal Jukić. Since this topic was not within my main field of interest before, if you know more about it will you please check if I have made some mistake there before I nominate it for DYK. All the best.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 15:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Looks like someone got to it before me following a WP:RFPP request; please feel free to use that in the future yourself, this is a no-brainer. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 13:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Can you please contact me at tomogrigor@gmail.com? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrwilhelm ( talk • contribs) 10:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
On 2 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Il Regio Dalmata – Kraglski Dalmatin, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1806 Franciscan friar Paškal Jukić was an editor of Il Regio Dalmata – Kraglski Dalmatin, the first Croatian-language newspaper? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Template:Croatia Yearbook 2011 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 ( talk) 09:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited This War of Mine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Fixed. DS ( talk) 12:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I believe your concerns with the DYK nomination of the above have been addressed.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 03:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
It has been said that repeating the same actions over and over while expecting differing results is a definition of insanity. What then do we call it when 50 or so of the world's most powerful men collaborate upon the repetition?
I hope my Sigma war games series will cause others to wonder the same.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 22:49, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
On 19 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Living Truth, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Božidarka Frajt won the Golden Arena for Best Actress for playing herself in The Living Truth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Living Truth. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 11:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
To you and yours
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 15:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
In appreciation for your contribution to the George Kline article LoveMonkey 17:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and your family! Timbouctou ( talk) 13:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 |
Congratulations on your decision to semi-retire, I hope the reason is a happy one. If you happen to be able to spare any attention to the hrwiki evidence gathering pages on Meta while they're still active it will be very welcome and appreciated, but thanks in no small part to your experience and judgment, I believe, with some trepidation, that I've learned enough to see them through to completion. It's been a pleasure working with you, and I'd like to extend my immense thanks for your work and initiative, along with my best wishes for an enjoyable Wiki-semi-retirement! 😎 – Miranche T C 18:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
I hope you will not decide against retiring altogether, the work you have done here is tremendous, I think you are an excellent editor with a head much cooler than mine, and good people like you are in short supply on Wikipedia. I would certainly be sorry to see you go. I just hope your decision has nothing to do with the whole hr.wiki affair as it is frankly not really worth it. Cheers man. Timbouctou ( talk) 21:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
– SJ + 21:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I am conducting a survey of most active Wikipedians, regarding reasons they may reduce their activity. I would be very interested in having you participate in it. Would you be interested? (If you reply to me here, please WP:ECHO me). Thank you for your consideration, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Here's the applicable part of the survey (Questions 1-3 are for editors who have not reduced their activity, so I am skipping them as to not waste your time):
Question 4. Chose one answer which BEST describes the reason you have reduced your contributions: a) because of new commitments (job, family, another hobby) or health reasons b) because of unpleasant atmosphere, conflict with other editors, or lack of respect c) because of being overworked with Wikipedia needs d) feeling undervalued e) other (please elaborate):
Question 5. Do you agree with the following statement (YES or NO): a) some of the most stressful moments in my life were related to my involvement with Wikipedia
Question 6. On a scale of 1-5, how likely are you to start contributing again (or return to your peak activity levels)? (1=Never, 5=Definitely, it's just a matter of time)
Question 7. If you would like to elaborate on the reasons you reduced your contributions, dispute that claim, suggest reforms to Wikipedia that would make it a better place for you to edit, or provide any other comments (including links to Wikipedia pages), please include them below. -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Hvala na odgovor, I tried copying your template but it's just showing a red link but whatever it's cool though Zastavafan76 ( talk) 22:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Opet velika hvala! Zastavafan76 ( talk) 00:45, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, i just found out you recently rated an article, i am the main contributor of, as "at least start class." What was missing for a "C-rating" other than the missing picture? Thanks, by a rather inexperienced user. Rka001 ( talk) 13:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Our Lady of Sinj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mehmed Pasha ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tramontane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Levante ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Regarding [1], this was live for three years so there's little point in outright removing it now; I archived it instead. It was not an insulting discussion as such (unlike the previous one). -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 07:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Studenci, Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kamešnica ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
You need to add a modicum of justification somewhere on that article and/or its talk page... the lead section still uses the Croatian spelling and the talk page is empty. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 11:33, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
I would appreciate your help with copy editing of Leftist errors.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 15:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi! What are you trying to do at Wikipedia:WikiProject Croatia/Frame? Does it have anything to do with the tabbed page design discussed at WT:CRO a while ago? Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 13:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
ona prava bosanska baklava :D :D WikiLite91 ( talk) 00:30, 12 April 2014 (UTC) |
Hi! Could you please take a look at the Croatia-Serbia border dispute in terms of B-class assessment and I'm not entirely sure if there should ba a hyphen or an ndash in the article title (please move accordingly if necessary). Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 23:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
If you want to redo that edit, go ahead, but do the same for all the analogous items. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 21:26, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Happy holidays and enjoy Wikipedia:WikiProject Croatia/News and alerts. Be sure to let me know how do you like that page.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 23:30, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
There's redlinked "showcase" link in the navigation. I thought to have User:JL-Bot maintain an automated listing of recognised content. One such listing maintained by the bot is available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Balkan military history task force#Article statistics. Cheers.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 09:07, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirko Kovač ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
I just noticed that interesting discussion you had on WP Croatia over minority languages. I have two questions.
Firstly, I noticed you said that it is fine to add minority names in infobox of municipalities and settlements that officially introduced bilingualism/multilingualism. Let me explain, I mean specifically municipalities that take step to introduce bilingualism, not just municipalities that are obliged to do so under Constitutional law but maybe still did not (Plus I would exclude Vukovar until we get final picture). It would be municipalities like Borovo or Kneževi Vinogradi. I know that the user DIRECTOR make big issue about that last time, but does this last discussion shows that his position does not enjoy majority support of community?
Second question is if someone can add section "official languages" into infobox settlement as I improvised in article Trpinja?-- MirkoS18 ( talk) 13:47, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi! I was wondering if you might be interested in resources offered by the Wikipedia Library and I thought to drop you a note that they're granting access to various otherwise paid resources for free at Wikipedia:TWL.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 10:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
I've replied to your message over there (just in case you aren't watching that page) -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 19:52, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Sanja RTL Televizija.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
I had created a list of Top 10 WP:CRO DYK articles before my last block. If you think this is useful, please copy it somewhere so I can delete the content from my subpage. Timbouctou ( talk) 12:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Category:Specific-source templates by country, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
On 4 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Savo Zlatić, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Savo Zlatić took up chess composition while imprisoned, using chess pieces made of bread? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Savo Zlatić. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 23:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Great job promoting Savo Zlatić to the Main Page. The hook you proposed was great. Keep up the good work! ComputerJA ( ☎ • ✎) 03:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC) |
Congrats on the DYK. Have you considered a GAN? Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 09:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you seem to be a smart and cool-headed editor. There is a page similar to the Shaitsu page, with many of the same contributors, and some similar debates. Seems to be a group that is split strongly between pro-altmed and Skeptic or anti-altmed viewpoints. A few more neutral voices would be helpful. Like Shiatsu, it's a challenge to keep a neutral, encyclopedic tone. Would you mind watchlisting this page: Rolfing, and if the mood strikes you, chime in? I hear that you are semi-retired so I'm sure you have plenty on your plate, so I would really appreciate it. Thanks!-- Karinpower ( talk) 22:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello again GregorB, I have appreciated your input in the past and especially that you seem to have a neutral yet educated point of view. I humbly request your assistance again. Three new Skeptic sources have been added to the Rolfing article; all 3 of these sources only mention the word "Rolfing" once, and only in a long list of alternative medicine topics. In each case, the author is making a blanket complaint about alt-med (though the grouping is quite different in each of the sources), and there is no specific information or criticism about Rolfing provided. The Skeptic's Dictionary is already cited, which is a much better Skeptic source, offering a full page of information and several specific criticisms. I believe these three new sources should be disallowed as they don't add anything about Rolfing. However, I am outnumbered as the editors on this page tend to favor a Skeptic source regardless of its quality. I realize this comes down to policy rather than a simple "vote" but a few more voices, and perhaps different opinions, would help. Everything is civil but I don't think we are going to be able to reach consensus on this matter. Thank you in advance!-- Karinpower ( talk) 22:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nenad Bach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nenad Bach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Cwobeel (talk) 00:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, GregorB! FYI: The following has been proposed on Talk:Sportsperson:
I currently have no opinion on which way to go, however, there is some discussion regarding the "athletics" vs. "track and field" issue that we've stumbled over previously. Cheers! Location ( talk) 06:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Imas email od mene. Pozdrav! -- Kolega2357 ( talk) 15:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi GregorB.
I just created an article about Paškal Jukić. Since this topic was not within my main field of interest before, if you know more about it will you please check if I have made some mistake there before I nominate it for DYK. All the best.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 15:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Looks like someone got to it before me following a WP:RFPP request; please feel free to use that in the future yourself, this is a no-brainer. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 13:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Can you please contact me at tomogrigor@gmail.com? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrwilhelm ( talk • contribs) 10:47, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
On 2 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Il Regio Dalmata – Kraglski Dalmatin, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1806 Franciscan friar Paškal Jukić was an editor of Il Regio Dalmata – Kraglski Dalmatin, the first Croatian-language newspaper? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 12:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Template:Croatia Yearbook 2011 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 ( talk) 09:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited This War of Mine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:07, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Fixed. DS ( talk) 12:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I believe your concerns with the DYK nomination of the above have been addressed.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 03:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
It has been said that repeating the same actions over and over while expecting differing results is a definition of insanity. What then do we call it when 50 or so of the world's most powerful men collaborate upon the repetition?
I hope my Sigma war games series will cause others to wonder the same.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 22:49, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
On 19 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Living Truth, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Božidarka Frajt won the Golden Arena for Best Actress for playing herself in The Living Truth? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Living Truth. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 11:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
To you and yours
FWiW Bzuk ( talk) 15:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
In appreciation for your contribution to the George Kline article LoveMonkey 17:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you and your family! Timbouctou ( talk) 13:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |