This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
I've left word responding to your excellent points here -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Blake_J._Robbins_v._Lower_Merion_School_District#Numbers_of_images. Also added a ref or two to the article, while deleting some ones not needed that led to confusion. Many tx, and great catch. Bottom line - while it would appear that the 66K number is accurate, perhaps it is less controversial (and not much different) to say "more than 58K"?-- Epeefleche ( talk) 20:13, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the catch -- by the time I got back to the article, at least four more edits had ensued. ---- 83d40m ( talk) 14:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps it was not good idea with this nomination. Leszek Jańczuk ( talk) 19:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
You're right... my original nomination is boring. I have struck it and offered one with something directly supported by the sources and far more likely to catch a reader's eye. Thanks, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks - I was just adding my comments. Agree that the DYK page is not the place for a theoretical debate. Aymatth2 ( talk) 02:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank for the edit, it was what was intended. Cgoodwin ( talk) 05:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
... for pointing out the bad link in my essay. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 23:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Malik Shabazz has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Apu1010 has eaten your {{
cookie}}! The cookie made them
happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{
cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ subst:munch}}!
I noticed your thoughtful response to my comment on the noticeboard, and just a couple of quick thoughts before I go off to do the homework that I really need to be doing...
Best wishes, CordeliaNaismith ( talk) 00:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Ok sorry about deleting your edits. I dunno how to manoeuvre here yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.158.199.139 ( talk) 18:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
"I'll stick with 'he who must not be named' in future, I suppose." I haven't laughed wholeheartedly many times over what I've read on-wiki, but your comment did the trick. Very, very funny. Thanks! – OhioStandard ( talk) 08:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for adding your input on the Greg Hicks article talk page. I noticed that the POV tag is still on the article page. Did you mean to leave it? If so then no problem. I was just confused because I thought that your note was okay with its removal. Thus, I thought that I would double check with you. Thanks again for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 01:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC).
I have the right to defend my homeland and kill hostile invaders who occupy my home. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawsradio2 ( talk • contribs) 02:47, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I have removed the pictures on the basis that no 1: for an island that is looking towards reunification such images are reminiscent of a sad past: no 2. i haven't seen any pictures on the USA article for instance of killings of indian aboriginals (to give an example) nor any images from concentration camps and killings on the Gemany article. Such images are disturbing and should not appear on the main article. Furthermore there is no actual proof that such killings took place neither do we know if those images are real.
Regarding the mosque pictures: This is a Republic of Cyprus article, the only legal entity according to the UN in the island, that in reality controls only the Greek part of the island. There are practically no muslims living in the south of the island hence a mosque appearing in the religion section is at a minimum absurd. Apart from that, inserting images of mosques and naming the mosques when in reality they are Frankish medieval christian cathedrals and OMITTING to mention that is NOT acceptable. This is not a propaganda page but a page on a country in an online encyclopedia... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giorgoos ( talk • contribs) 18:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your questions and edits as regards Porter BLP. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Likely needs attention for sure - look at latest "edit summary". Collect ( talk) 19:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
are here. Please take a look at those. Regards.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 20:39, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi! I want to ask You, why were You undid my last editions in the
MIET article?
So, is it contrary to the rules of Wikipedia??
Note: Please, answer this in my discussion pag, please and answer please to the questions at my discussion page, at last dialogue.
Thank You. --
Ksaine (
user talk ·
user contributions) 21:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Plz, specify my incorrect edits (from 3RR and your PoV) more exactly or exclude my correct edits. I understand, that some of my edits are not obvious. But do I need to explain why full date are unwikilinked and sup-categories are removed? Or, are you talking about official names and acronyms?
Or, plz, specify aspects of article which are disputed and which are non-disputed from en-wiki principles and/or your PoV.
Or, plz, specify version of article from which edits must be discussed. Alex Spade ( talk) 23:35, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Which noticeboard should I use instead? 93.97.59.17 ( talk) 21:20, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the corrections on this edit. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:39, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
User:Demiurge1000/Second enquiry into the Rlevse affair, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Demiurge1000/Second enquiry into the Rlevse affair and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Demiurge1000/Second enquiry into the Rlevse affair during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Alpha Quadrant talk 01:24, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
I think you need to talk to TropicalAnalystwx13 about a few things.
Firstly, he should not be tagging his (and other people's) sandboxes with WikiProject tags. This has happened on more than one occasion.
Secondly, you really need to have a good talk to him about citing sources and original research, cf. List of Category 3 Atlantic hurricanes, which he started in article space then moved to User:TropicalAnalystwx13/Sandbox7. The entire thing as it stands is very bad OR.
Finally, please talk to him about his signature. It's useless when there aren't any links to his user or usertalk pages in it.
Sorry to be a bother. Thanks. Strange Passerby ( talk • contribs) 02:33, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
As he has now addressed all the issues constructively, I have withdrawn the MFD. I have also warned him that this doesn't give him the right to edit that page in such a way that it ends up violating the guidelines again; I suspect that might end up being classed as disruptive editing. Best, Strange Passerby ( talk • contribs) 08:17, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I meant the constant chatting and providing irrelevant personal information. Inka 888 04:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Alpha Quadrant
talk 21:53, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Belated thanks for the template, AQ. However, as I pointed out here, the page is not an attack page; it "comments - through humour - on a viewpoint or set of viewpoints. Not on an individual. It is totally in the spirit of commenting on content, not on the contributor". A concensus was reached at MfD that the page did not require deletion, and the page was kept. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 05:46, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
|
Hello I am Apiel51 ( talk) 13:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC). I am representing a group of students deciding to edit the article the Virginia Plan. We would like your help with this. How should we start?
Hello this is Wikipedian107 and I also am a member of team 2b at Southern Lehigh. As you already know we are going to edit the Separation of Powers; so if you have any questions or comments please post tips on my Discussion Page. Thank you and hope to hear from you soon! -Wikipedian107 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedian107 ( talk • contribs) 14:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello````, Im from Southern Lehigh Middle School Im doing a project and want to know if you could help. Our project is on separations of powers. Looking at your wall you seem to be very knowledgeable about this topic. Do you think you can help us???????????? thanks ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccermonkey3 ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 15:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi I'm Schaffere ( talk) 19:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC) from Southern Lehigh Middle School in Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA. We are interested in improving the Civics article for our group's social studies project. Our group was wondering if you might want to help us edit this page. Examining your page it seems to appear you are a very reliable and knowledgeable ambassador that might be willing to contribute to this project. Do you think you may be able to assist us? Thank You!
Thanks very much for your help there. I have further queried whether the material in question should be permanently removed; I've also noted the template uw-biog3 that you used! Cheers DBaK ( talk) 08:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
I see that you are helping out with the Michigan student-essay business in Wikipedia-Chemistry. I urge caution, and hope that you can guide this changing consortium and/or individuals to cooperate within the spirit of WIkipedia. Here are some problems that I see:
-- Smokefoot ( talk) 04:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daedalus969 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Hey. It's about 1867 Atlantic hurricane season, aka User:TropicalAnalystwx13/Sandbox7. Without wanting to be too WP:BITEy towards him, I've tagged the article for needing more sources and original research. I'm sorry, but just three incline citations from two sources throughout that entire article just screams "original research". You need to talk to him about using sources and citing them. Have a good holiday season. Strange Passerby ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I'm wondering if you can help me with an article I'm working on to prepare it for GAC, Malmö FF. I've already put out a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests but I noticed that you are a british native, I've decided to go for the british norm in verb form and spelling of some words so I think your help would improve the article. I´m myself a native Swedish speaker so there might be some mistakes that I've made which is why the article needs copyediting. I would really appreciate your help! If so please confirm that you're working on it at the guild of copy editors request page. Thank You! -- Reckless182 ( talk) 14:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your hard work on the article; it was needed. Also, what do you think of its chances at FAC? I'm planning to nominate soon, but first I'll need to review that problem in the Post-race section. Thanks again and happy editing. Nascar 1996 02:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello I noticed you are named Demiurge. I have been working off and on for some time on the actual demiurge article. I was wondering if I could get you to contribute to the article? I have a very hard time expressing the actually meaning of Demiurge (i.e. the pagan God as consciousness) and getting that articulated to the article as there is the difference between the arche and the consciousness ( dyad, demiurge, nous) that is rooted in the perception that no God can ever relate to mankind without being anthropomorphic in it's thoughts (logos), and essence, for example Philo of Alexandria).
Which of course is rejected by the Judeo-Christian-Muslim God (yes in Greek he's called the creator but that's linguistics for you) whom is incomprehensible in his ability to create from nothing (i.e. not anthropomorphic). However the closer to reason or logical a person (in paganism) the more sane they are, and therefore to malign the nous (demiurge) is to promote insanity (at least in Pagan philosophy). Some of the early pagans it appears had kinda of boxed in the Judeo-Christian-Muslim God as a (creator, demiurge) that shared the same limits (anthropromorphism) as their creator Gods and they had a set of "ideas" that undid the holding of such a being in the highest esteem. As there was much criticism of Zeus for example. This is very complicated and I would like to stop working on the article.
Somehow this understanding and distinction needs to be added to the article and I am at a loss as to make that happen. Thanks LoveMonkey ( talk) 15:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Demiurge1000. May I please ask you to review Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars, and to stay off my talk page? Thanks. Warm regards.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 03:38, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 ( talk) 16:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
i've never started a ban proposal, hope i'll never have to again; feel free to change the flippant wording @ANI if you like. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 14:50, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
The one user should not have posted that he was going to contact the parents, and the other user should not have asked the totally stupid question of why he was going to do that. In fact, the name of the minor is still within that user's rambling essay, last I looked. The entire page (except for the block notice) should be rubbed out and full-protected. Why the admins have not taken that action already, I have no clue. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
As you are the one who PRODded the above article, I thought I should alert you to the AfD. Thank you in advance for any comments you make there. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 04:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
That edit I made: It wasn't vandalism, it was an expression of angst over the state of batch production in this world! GMANTHETRUTH ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC).
I am very glad to read that you have removed deletion tag from Sheikh Omar Hayat. I hope you will really help me in the future or not...?
-- —just feel it (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:28, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed your inquiry at EdChem's talk page. For a similar situation and the solution used in that case, you might wish to read Talk:Nominated Member of Parliament#Merger. - Station1 ( talk) 07:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! AustralianRupert ( talk) 02:58, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
|
I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads ( talk) 02:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
I would just like to point out that the article is not unreferenced. It doesn't have inline citations, however. Reaper Eternal ( talk) 16:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
I am currently addressing the citations and other issues needed to correct the page for Beth S. Green. Please give me a few days to make these corrections so we can avoid a deletion of the page. Thank you.
Drmidi2010 ( talk) 23:22, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I reverted your change. All (or least it seems to be all) of the sources I've been looking at on the interception of slave ships by the Royal Navy and the U.S. Navy refer to "recaptured Africans". I know it's an awkward term, but it appears that the Africans taken from illegal slave ships had an unsettled status until they were declared emancipated by an appropriate authority, which in the case of Nimble was the British-Spanish Mixed Commission Court in Havana, or the equivalent British-Portuguese court in Sierra Leone. For one thing, only the importation of slaves from another country was forbidden. Existing slaves could still be moved by ship. The Spanish/Cubans claimed that the slaves on the Amistad were legal slaves, not newly imported, and if the courts had decided that was true, the Amistad slaves would have had to be returned to Cuba. I'm thinking about looking into whether there is enough substance to the concept to create an article. It may also be covered in some existing article, and if I can find a suitable article, I'll link "recaptured" to it. -- Donald Albury 01:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
There is an ARBCOM request which is related to an AN/I thread you recently participated. You may be interested in the discussion. -- Cyclopia talk 10:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Demiurge1000: Many thanks for your reply, and all the links, in response to my query about how to fix the wikipedia page about a living person, namely myself (in subject line). Wikipedia is a fantastic site, that I've referenced often in my work as a journalist (and in life generally). Its workings, all the volunteers and dialogue and collaboration is absolutely fascinating. But the coding and procedures are totally beyond me (and apologies if I've mucked this reply up, but I'm so old world, I cannot let your kind note pass without acknowledgement and thanks.) In any case, I think the wiki guidelines are right - people really shouldn't edit their own pages. Best wishes....ron gluckman Rongluckman ( talk) 18:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC) (hope that was right?)
Rongluckman ( talk) 18:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Listing of dismissed charges is entirely too common -- see David Copperfield (illusionist) for a clear example (the "rape charges" stuff) (and the older edits were far worse). BLP needs to be strictly enforced IMHO. Cheers. Collect ( talk) 02:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Please do not perform disruptive editing of Wikipedia articles, as you did to Richard Boyd Barrett. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Viticulturist99 ( talk) 17:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Boyd Barrett, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The warning you gave me on Viticulturist99 ( talk) was a frivolous warning. I haven't done a single reversion but kept editing and improving the article according to the consensus finally reached on the talk page. Your intervention amounts to censorship if not to harrassment. Wikipedia is not not censored. Please stop. -- Viticulturist99 ( talk) 04:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Demiurge, I would appreciate some guidance re adding material to the RBB page, I have lots of well sourced additions to make, and would like to know where I can get some help re properly inserting references etc Dave Lordan ( talk) 11:12, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Please read my last comment in this Rfc. Is wikipedia a dealing company ?!!! Now that I have discovered it, the author should have his own article. *** in fact *** ( contact ) 11:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
I've just had a note from you that I am engaged in an edit war. If you have the power, can I ask you to lock the article? I wrote most of the Mithras article. For the last week one user, "CivilisedEducation", has been trying to change it to reflect some POV of his own. He knows nothing about Mithras, and he won't discuss sensibly the objections of those of us who have been working on it for years. I asked for the article to be locked, and wrote a list of the changes for discussion on the talk page. This was ignored, and an edit war commenced. You're attacking the victim here! Can you help? Roger Pearse ( talk) 01:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
yes, i am part of User:Wikipedian107 's team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apu1010 ( talk • contribs) 13:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Demiurge1000 I would like to award you this Barnstar for you help on my article The Academy at Lincoln. I am fairly new to Wikipedia and am still working on learning all of the rules and Wikipedia guide lines. Thanks for editing my page, stopping the vandalism on it, and making it better conform to Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks for all your help teaching me the ropes, if i need anymore help I will be sure to let you know! @ d \/\/ | | |,~ Adwiii - Questions? Comments? 00:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
THe information on the Academy at Lincoln page is incorrect. Trey [surname redacted] was voted top conceited debater by the class not top debater, and he himself creating the page put false informmation up to make himself look better. 2.20.11 Kittyhalt ( talk) 01:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 15:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting the obvious cut and paste error that was a result of a lot of improvement to the page; next time consider leaving the sarcasm out of the edit summary. -- Kudpung ( talk) 06:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
On cleanstart now. -- Perseus 8235 16:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
I have tried to follow much of your advice and I am still working on other thing that you have mentioned, thanks for all your help. Right now though I am really confused, on all of the categories that is is in it shows up under the M section and I really have no idea why can you help? Thanks. @ d \/\/ | | |,~ Adwiii - Questions? Comments? 02:07, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Basically, I think we are looking at a case of WP:CIR. Frank | talk 04:20, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
I have monitored the list thus far and find nothing that needs to be added at this time. I will consider it a success if a majority of them are followed, and I don't need to get further involved in trying to make that happen. Furthermore, I think that the list is already a bit long, so if I did think of something, I would expressly not add it at this time for fear of being overly intimidating. It appears to me you've misconstrued my involvement in the first place, and further that you feel I am looking for reasons to wield a large stick. Nothing could be further from the truth; I've steadfastly avoided being heavy-handed in any way. If you look through this user's histories, you'll see that I've applied gentle reminders and admonitions all along the way. And, of course, giant ducks are not the point; you know that. Frank | talk 23:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
I've left word responding to your excellent points here -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Blake_J._Robbins_v._Lower_Merion_School_District#Numbers_of_images. Also added a ref or two to the article, while deleting some ones not needed that led to confusion. Many tx, and great catch. Bottom line - while it would appear that the 66K number is accurate, perhaps it is less controversial (and not much different) to say "more than 58K"?-- Epeefleche ( talk) 20:13, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the catch -- by the time I got back to the article, at least four more edits had ensued. ---- 83d40m ( talk) 14:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps it was not good idea with this nomination. Leszek Jańczuk ( talk) 19:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
You're right... my original nomination is boring. I have struck it and offered one with something directly supported by the sources and far more likely to catch a reader's eye. Thanks, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks - I was just adding my comments. Agree that the DYK page is not the place for a theoretical debate. Aymatth2 ( talk) 02:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank for the edit, it was what was intended. Cgoodwin ( talk) 05:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
... for pointing out the bad link in my essay. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 23:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Malik Shabazz has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Apu1010 has eaten your {{
cookie}}! The cookie made them
happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{
cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ subst:munch}}!
I noticed your thoughtful response to my comment on the noticeboard, and just a couple of quick thoughts before I go off to do the homework that I really need to be doing...
Best wishes, CordeliaNaismith ( talk) 00:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Ok sorry about deleting your edits. I dunno how to manoeuvre here yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.158.199.139 ( talk) 18:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
"I'll stick with 'he who must not be named' in future, I suppose." I haven't laughed wholeheartedly many times over what I've read on-wiki, but your comment did the trick. Very, very funny. Thanks! – OhioStandard ( talk) 08:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for adding your input on the Greg Hicks article talk page. I noticed that the POV tag is still on the article page. Did you mean to leave it? If so then no problem. I was just confused because I thought that your note was okay with its removal. Thus, I thought that I would double check with you. Thanks again for your time. MarnetteD | Talk 01:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC).
I have the right to defend my homeland and kill hostile invaders who occupy my home. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawsradio2 ( talk • contribs) 02:47, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I have removed the pictures on the basis that no 1: for an island that is looking towards reunification such images are reminiscent of a sad past: no 2. i haven't seen any pictures on the USA article for instance of killings of indian aboriginals (to give an example) nor any images from concentration camps and killings on the Gemany article. Such images are disturbing and should not appear on the main article. Furthermore there is no actual proof that such killings took place neither do we know if those images are real.
Regarding the mosque pictures: This is a Republic of Cyprus article, the only legal entity according to the UN in the island, that in reality controls only the Greek part of the island. There are practically no muslims living in the south of the island hence a mosque appearing in the religion section is at a minimum absurd. Apart from that, inserting images of mosques and naming the mosques when in reality they are Frankish medieval christian cathedrals and OMITTING to mention that is NOT acceptable. This is not a propaganda page but a page on a country in an online encyclopedia... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giorgoos ( talk • contribs) 18:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your questions and edits as regards Porter BLP. Off2riorob ( talk) 20:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Likely needs attention for sure - look at latest "edit summary". Collect ( talk) 19:14, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
are here. Please take a look at those. Regards.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 20:39, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 00:49, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi! I want to ask You, why were You undid my last editions in the
MIET article?
So, is it contrary to the rules of Wikipedia??
Note: Please, answer this in my discussion pag, please and answer please to the questions at my discussion page, at last dialogue.
Thank You. --
Ksaine (
user talk ·
user contributions) 21:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Plz, specify my incorrect edits (from 3RR and your PoV) more exactly or exclude my correct edits. I understand, that some of my edits are not obvious. But do I need to explain why full date are unwikilinked and sup-categories are removed? Or, are you talking about official names and acronyms?
Or, plz, specify aspects of article which are disputed and which are non-disputed from en-wiki principles and/or your PoV.
Or, plz, specify version of article from which edits must be discussed. Alex Spade ( talk) 23:35, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Which noticeboard should I use instead? 93.97.59.17 ( talk) 21:20, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the corrections on this edit. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:39, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
User:Demiurge1000/Second enquiry into the Rlevse affair, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Demiurge1000/Second enquiry into the Rlevse affair and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Demiurge1000/Second enquiry into the Rlevse affair during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Alpha Quadrant talk 01:24, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
I think you need to talk to TropicalAnalystwx13 about a few things.
Firstly, he should not be tagging his (and other people's) sandboxes with WikiProject tags. This has happened on more than one occasion.
Secondly, you really need to have a good talk to him about citing sources and original research, cf. List of Category 3 Atlantic hurricanes, which he started in article space then moved to User:TropicalAnalystwx13/Sandbox7. The entire thing as it stands is very bad OR.
Finally, please talk to him about his signature. It's useless when there aren't any links to his user or usertalk pages in it.
Sorry to be a bother. Thanks. Strange Passerby ( talk • contribs) 02:33, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
As he has now addressed all the issues constructively, I have withdrawn the MFD. I have also warned him that this doesn't give him the right to edit that page in such a way that it ends up violating the guidelines again; I suspect that might end up being classed as disruptive editing. Best, Strange Passerby ( talk • contribs) 08:17, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I meant the constant chatting and providing irrelevant personal information. Inka 888 04:42, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Alpha Quadrant
talk 21:53, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Belated thanks for the template, AQ. However, as I pointed out here, the page is not an attack page; it "comments - through humour - on a viewpoint or set of viewpoints. Not on an individual. It is totally in the spirit of commenting on content, not on the contributor". A concensus was reached at MfD that the page did not require deletion, and the page was kept. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 05:46, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
|
Hello I am Apiel51 ( talk) 13:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC). I am representing a group of students deciding to edit the article the Virginia Plan. We would like your help with this. How should we start?
Hello this is Wikipedian107 and I also am a member of team 2b at Southern Lehigh. As you already know we are going to edit the Separation of Powers; so if you have any questions or comments please post tips on my Discussion Page. Thank you and hope to hear from you soon! -Wikipedian107 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipedian107 ( talk • contribs) 14:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello````, Im from Southern Lehigh Middle School Im doing a project and want to know if you could help. Our project is on separations of powers. Looking at your wall you seem to be very knowledgeable about this topic. Do you think you can help us???????????? thanks ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccermonkey3 ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 15:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi I'm Schaffere ( talk) 19:25, 17 December 2010 (UTC) from Southern Lehigh Middle School in Center Valley, Pennsylvania, USA. We are interested in improving the Civics article for our group's social studies project. Our group was wondering if you might want to help us edit this page. Examining your page it seems to appear you are a very reliable and knowledgeable ambassador that might be willing to contribute to this project. Do you think you may be able to assist us? Thank You!
Thanks very much for your help there. I have further queried whether the material in question should be permanently removed; I've also noted the template uw-biog3 that you used! Cheers DBaK ( talk) 08:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
I see that you are helping out with the Michigan student-essay business in Wikipedia-Chemistry. I urge caution, and hope that you can guide this changing consortium and/or individuals to cooperate within the spirit of WIkipedia. Here are some problems that I see:
-- Smokefoot ( talk) 04:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daedalus969 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 18:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Hey. It's about 1867 Atlantic hurricane season, aka User:TropicalAnalystwx13/Sandbox7. Without wanting to be too WP:BITEy towards him, I've tagged the article for needing more sources and original research. I'm sorry, but just three incline citations from two sources throughout that entire article just screams "original research". You need to talk to him about using sources and citing them. Have a good holiday season. Strange Passerby ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I'm wondering if you can help me with an article I'm working on to prepare it for GAC, Malmö FF. I've already put out a request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests but I noticed that you are a british native, I've decided to go for the british norm in verb form and spelling of some words so I think your help would improve the article. I´m myself a native Swedish speaker so there might be some mistakes that I've made which is why the article needs copyediting. I would really appreciate your help! If so please confirm that you're working on it at the guild of copy editors request page. Thank You! -- Reckless182 ( talk) 14:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your hard work on the article; it was needed. Also, what do you think of its chances at FAC? I'm planning to nominate soon, but first I'll need to review that problem in the Post-race section. Thanks again and happy editing. Nascar 1996 02:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello I noticed you are named Demiurge. I have been working off and on for some time on the actual demiurge article. I was wondering if I could get you to contribute to the article? I have a very hard time expressing the actually meaning of Demiurge (i.e. the pagan God as consciousness) and getting that articulated to the article as there is the difference between the arche and the consciousness ( dyad, demiurge, nous) that is rooted in the perception that no God can ever relate to mankind without being anthropomorphic in it's thoughts (logos), and essence, for example Philo of Alexandria).
Which of course is rejected by the Judeo-Christian-Muslim God (yes in Greek he's called the creator but that's linguistics for you) whom is incomprehensible in his ability to create from nothing (i.e. not anthropomorphic). However the closer to reason or logical a person (in paganism) the more sane they are, and therefore to malign the nous (demiurge) is to promote insanity (at least in Pagan philosophy). Some of the early pagans it appears had kinda of boxed in the Judeo-Christian-Muslim God as a (creator, demiurge) that shared the same limits (anthropromorphism) as their creator Gods and they had a set of "ideas" that undid the holding of such a being in the highest esteem. As there was much criticism of Zeus for example. This is very complicated and I would like to stop working on the article.
Somehow this understanding and distinction needs to be added to the article and I am at a loss as to make that happen. Thanks LoveMonkey ( talk) 15:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, Demiurge1000. May I please ask you to review Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars, and to stay off my talk page? Thanks. Warm regards.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 03:38, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 ( talk) 16:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
i've never started a ban proposal, hope i'll never have to again; feel free to change the flippant wording @ANI if you like. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 14:50, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
The one user should not have posted that he was going to contact the parents, and the other user should not have asked the totally stupid question of why he was going to do that. In fact, the name of the minor is still within that user's rambling essay, last I looked. The entire page (except for the block notice) should be rubbed out and full-protected. Why the admins have not taken that action already, I have no clue. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
As you are the one who PRODded the above article, I thought I should alert you to the AfD. Thank you in advance for any comments you make there. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 04:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
That edit I made: It wasn't vandalism, it was an expression of angst over the state of batch production in this world! GMANTHETRUTH ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:15, 14 January 2011 (UTC).
I am very glad to read that you have removed deletion tag from Sheikh Omar Hayat. I hope you will really help me in the future or not...?
-- —just feel it (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:28, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed your inquiry at EdChem's talk page. For a similar situation and the solution used in that case, you might wish to read Talk:Nominated Member of Parliament#Merger. - Station1 ( talk) 07:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! AustralianRupert ( talk) 02:58, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
|
I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads ( talk) 02:33, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
I would just like to point out that the article is not unreferenced. It doesn't have inline citations, however. Reaper Eternal ( talk) 16:36, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
I am currently addressing the citations and other issues needed to correct the page for Beth S. Green. Please give me a few days to make these corrections so we can avoid a deletion of the page. Thank you.
Drmidi2010 ( talk) 23:22, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I reverted your change. All (or least it seems to be all) of the sources I've been looking at on the interception of slave ships by the Royal Navy and the U.S. Navy refer to "recaptured Africans". I know it's an awkward term, but it appears that the Africans taken from illegal slave ships had an unsettled status until they were declared emancipated by an appropriate authority, which in the case of Nimble was the British-Spanish Mixed Commission Court in Havana, or the equivalent British-Portuguese court in Sierra Leone. For one thing, only the importation of slaves from another country was forbidden. Existing slaves could still be moved by ship. The Spanish/Cubans claimed that the slaves on the Amistad were legal slaves, not newly imported, and if the courts had decided that was true, the Amistad slaves would have had to be returned to Cuba. I'm thinking about looking into whether there is enough substance to the concept to create an article. It may also be covered in some existing article, and if I can find a suitable article, I'll link "recaptured" to it. -- Donald Albury 01:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
There is an ARBCOM request which is related to an AN/I thread you recently participated. You may be interested in the discussion. -- Cyclopia talk 10:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Demiurge1000: Many thanks for your reply, and all the links, in response to my query about how to fix the wikipedia page about a living person, namely myself (in subject line). Wikipedia is a fantastic site, that I've referenced often in my work as a journalist (and in life generally). Its workings, all the volunteers and dialogue and collaboration is absolutely fascinating. But the coding and procedures are totally beyond me (and apologies if I've mucked this reply up, but I'm so old world, I cannot let your kind note pass without acknowledgement and thanks.) In any case, I think the wiki guidelines are right - people really shouldn't edit their own pages. Best wishes....ron gluckman Rongluckman ( talk) 18:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC) (hope that was right?)
Rongluckman ( talk) 18:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 11:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Listing of dismissed charges is entirely too common -- see David Copperfield (illusionist) for a clear example (the "rape charges" stuff) (and the older edits were far worse). BLP needs to be strictly enforced IMHO. Cheers. Collect ( talk) 02:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Please do not perform disruptive editing of Wikipedia articles, as you did to Richard Boyd Barrett. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Viticulturist99 ( talk) 17:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Boyd Barrett, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The warning you gave me on Viticulturist99 ( talk) was a frivolous warning. I haven't done a single reversion but kept editing and improving the article according to the consensus finally reached on the talk page. Your intervention amounts to censorship if not to harrassment. Wikipedia is not not censored. Please stop. -- Viticulturist99 ( talk) 04:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Demiurge, I would appreciate some guidance re adding material to the RBB page, I have lots of well sourced additions to make, and would like to know where I can get some help re properly inserting references etc Dave Lordan ( talk) 11:12, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Please read my last comment in this Rfc. Is wikipedia a dealing company ?!!! Now that I have discovered it, the author should have his own article. *** in fact *** ( contact ) 11:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
I've just had a note from you that I am engaged in an edit war. If you have the power, can I ask you to lock the article? I wrote most of the Mithras article. For the last week one user, "CivilisedEducation", has been trying to change it to reflect some POV of his own. He knows nothing about Mithras, and he won't discuss sensibly the objections of those of us who have been working on it for years. I asked for the article to be locked, and wrote a list of the changes for discussion on the talk page. This was ignored, and an edit war commenced. You're attacking the victim here! Can you help? Roger Pearse ( talk) 01:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
yes, i am part of User:Wikipedian107 's team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apu1010 ( talk • contribs) 13:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Demiurge1000 I would like to award you this Barnstar for you help on my article The Academy at Lincoln. I am fairly new to Wikipedia and am still working on learning all of the rules and Wikipedia guide lines. Thanks for editing my page, stopping the vandalism on it, and making it better conform to Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks for all your help teaching me the ropes, if i need anymore help I will be sure to let you know! @ d \/\/ | | |,~ Adwiii - Questions? Comments? 00:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC) |
THe information on the Academy at Lincoln page is incorrect. Trey [surname redacted] was voted top conceited debater by the class not top debater, and he himself creating the page put false informmation up to make himself look better. 2.20.11 Kittyhalt ( talk) 01:03, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot ( talk) 15:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for correcting the obvious cut and paste error that was a result of a lot of improvement to the page; next time consider leaving the sarcasm out of the edit summary. -- Kudpung ( talk) 06:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
On cleanstart now. -- Perseus 8235 16:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
I have tried to follow much of your advice and I am still working on other thing that you have mentioned, thanks for all your help. Right now though I am really confused, on all of the categories that is is in it shows up under the M section and I really have no idea why can you help? Thanks. @ d \/\/ | | |,~ Adwiii - Questions? Comments? 02:07, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Basically, I think we are looking at a case of WP:CIR. Frank | talk 04:20, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
I have monitored the list thus far and find nothing that needs to be added at this time. I will consider it a success if a majority of them are followed, and I don't need to get further involved in trying to make that happen. Furthermore, I think that the list is already a bit long, so if I did think of something, I would expressly not add it at this time for fear of being overly intimidating. It appears to me you've misconstrued my involvement in the first place, and further that you feel I am looking for reasons to wield a large stick. Nothing could be further from the truth; I've steadfastly avoided being heavy-handed in any way. If you look through this user's histories, you'll see that I've applied gentle reminders and admonitions all along the way. And, of course, giant ducks are not the point; you know that. Frank | talk 23:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)