This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as
contentious topics:
|
Chaipau,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 10:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Please don't revert sourced content of Dimasa Kingdom. Dhruv Hojai ( talk) 11:14, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bengali–Assamese languages; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Za-ari-masen ( talk) 09:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
This is just book. Different tribe have different folklore. Baraha is title not Barahi subtribe of chutia. So, Is there any Barahi in Cachar ? Cachar name itself originate from Kachari. Just like Varman ,Pala, Khen are just dynasty name. Similarly baraha is just dynasty. It doesn't mean different should be seperate tribe. Is there any sworgodeo tribe ? Dhruv Hojai ( talk) 17:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Do you have any evidence of Sukafa except your Buranjis ? Similarly we have our historical evidence of hachengsa dynasty who ruled kamarupa. Hachengsa means earth-born. What is your problem with our history ? Why are you deleting claims of Historian in support of Bodo-Kachari ? Dhruv Hojai ( talk) 06:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Ha=land , Tsung= cheng = split , tsa=sa=son=born , hachengsa = earth-born, Kamarupa means Kachari kingdom. Kalika puran Mahiranga = Mairong deity of Kacharis , Kalika puran , Tripura Rajmala etc have Kachari history. We don't lack evidence , We lack proper research. Dhruv Hojai ( talk) 11:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC) @ Chaipau: Hachengsa family deserve a place in kamarupa kingdom because it's royal claim and achaeologically evident. Hachengsa means earth-born. Dhruv Hojai ( talk) 11:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
In your recent edit in Assamese literature ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/937987696) you changed "Ancient era" to "Early Assamese", but this ancient era is actually Kamarupi Prakrit (aka Old Assamese as mentioned by Chaterjee). Early Assamese comes in "Medieval era" of Pre-Vaishnava/Pre-Sankari and Vaishnava/Sankari perids. Then Middle Assamese comes under the "post-Sankari period (1700-1826)". Msasag ( talk) 19:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
I declined your speedy deletion request on Greater Kamrup, since it doesn't meet the definition of blatant hoax. In your edit summary you mentioned WP:POVFORK. Those are not speedyable, especially for one that's been around for seven years already. If you feel it should be deleted, feel free to take it to AfD (I will contest a prod not because I feel it must stay but because I think this needs discussion).---- Fabrictramp | talk to me 04:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bijni kingdom, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
You have been removing content related to Boro people. Your act is against a community. I don't think Wikipedia allow this type of Behavior. If you'll keep repeating same behaviour then you may be blocked DinaBasumatary ( talk) 08:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Dimasa aren't Boro and Boro aren't Dimasa. Don't you understand English ? Go and read what is written in Kakoty research. It's related to memoir of Sylhet and Cachar... That paper talk about Kacharis of Cachar. Ramsa migrated from Cachar to Plain. You've no right to distort Boro History. Your act against Bodo community is not acceptable as per Wikipedia rule DinaBasumatary ( talk) 10:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
You've removed Boro from Mahamanikya page also. That claim was backed by modern scholar. Read it. Sen, Debasis (1984). "ETHNIC ELEMENTS IN THE POLITICAL LIFE OF ANCIENT ASSAM". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 45: 101–106. DinaBasumatary ( talk) 10:29, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Who is mixing ? Bodo = Boro. Don't you know pronunciation ? DinaBasumatary ( talk) 13:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
If you are a literate person then just look at census of all the districts of Assam.
Don't talk like a jealous person. DinaBasumatary ( talk) 13:52, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
You have cited Bathari very much. So, Add batharis claim about river crossing . That happened between Dimasa and Moran. Gogoi assumption of Kachari ghat is mistake. DinaBasumatary ( talk) 11:02, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boro–Garo languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creole ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
You are welcome. Have some tea! (offering tea to the chai guy ) Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:58, 30 March 2020 (UTC) |
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Yunshui
雲
水 14:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)I've lifted the block; since the opposite party has now been blocked as a sockpuppet and since your message on my talkpage clearly showed that you recognised the problems with your own approach, I see no likelihood of the edit war continuing and thus no reason to maintain a block on editing the article. Yunshui 雲 水 09:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Since, Boro is phonetically better. Don't you think , Bodo-Kacharis page should be moved to Boro-Kacharis ? Scholars used Bodo with Boro pronunciation. S.K. Chatterjee, Grierson , Endle clarified the exact pronunciation. Thank you 2409:4065:12:5789:E080:12CE:BAE1:C42F ( talk) 18:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
There is a problem in statement related first publication of Bodo word. Martin Montgomery(1838) in The history, antiquities, topography, and statistics of eastern India writes that Proper name of Kacharis is Boro.(page 549) 2409:4065:8D:ED9F:106:B716:BEBA:D92A ( talk) 05:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
I semiprotected the Bodo-Kachari article as the IPv6 is clearly either Qwertywander or Sairg. Please ping me or WP:ANI if you spot any more. The latest sock to be blocked was Paragkumardas ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Guy ( help!) 12:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cerebellum ( talk) 02:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)I think you misunderstood my edit. I'm not linking Mahamanikya with Khalang or Borahi because Khalang Borahi were Chutiya and Barāha of Nagaon were Kachari. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 11:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Ok. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 11:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Is it require move entire Kachari kingdom to Dimasa kingdom as you did here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Kachari_Kingdom&redirect=no ? There were many small small Kachari kingdoms. Shin ignored beginning and took Hachengsa as base for Dimasa history. So, we can keep the confusion part as Kachari history. Some scholars confusingly connected Dimasa with Kachari kingdom of Ganeshguri. We can keep these unclear history in Kachari kingdom page. Thanks Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 09:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
"Neolithic correlates of ancient Tibeto-Burman migrations" , This paper says many things about neolithic culture of Tibeto-Burman Northeast because many things discovered in northeast have relation with China. I would prefer to categorise Austroasiatic and Tibeto-burman within a new section "Neolithic" people of Assam Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 20:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Guha had written that Indo-Aryan brought wet rice , iron etc without any reference. How can we believe it's true ? And Taher, Mohammad (1993), "The Peopling of Assam and contemporary social structure" have mixed Bodo-Kachari with Monpas, Naga etc. Naga itself is mysterious name for many different tribes. If you've better source then please add it. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 09:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
I would suggest you not keep tagging everything with Bodo-kachari peoples. It's no more racial group. Garo of hills were headhunter. Dimasa had completely different culture from Boro. Koch-Rajbongshi is confusing. So, Please be specific instead of mixing everything. Just like Pre-historic or medieval Indo-Aryan don't want to be categorised with Recent Bangladeshi immigrants. Infact, There is lots of opposition to Bodo or Bodo-kachari umbrella from other groups. Anybody can learn a language. Scholars have already suggested that Boro-Garo was kind of lingua franca. So, Based on language we can never say everybody were same people. Thanks Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 12:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Don't remove cited content as you did here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Boro_people&diff=954219881&oldid=954216885 . If you have any problem then seek concensus from other editors Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 09:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Logical Man 2000: I did not understand how I am erasing the hardwork and sacrifice of Boros. Chaipau ( talk) 10:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
You have either twisted or removed most things which goes in favour of Boro. Since, Mech word is related to founder of Koch kingdom. You opposed merge of Mech with Boro. Since, Varaha have relation with Boro. You removed the information from etymology. You can carry on. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 10:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Roman script isn't enough to represent all the letters of Varnamala. Bodo and Boro will go in parallel just like Assam and Axom Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 10:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
We are talking about people. We can create different page for language. Within Boro there are four dialects. I'm talking about Mech people. You are talking about language. There is difference. No mech of Goalpara or Original Mech call themselves mech. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 11:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Dimasa also have hojai language and different certificate. These aren't real name of community. These are just by product. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 12:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Do you understand meaning of etymology ? If you don't know then please check it. BTW , Here Assam#Etymology, you've defined Ahom. Do you have any personal problem with Boro people ? Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 17:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Since, Bodo or Bodo-Kachari is linguistic and anthropological term. Don't you think - we should change Bodo-Kachari_peoples to just Bodo-Kachari Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 10:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Ok, Thank you. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 12:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
That style looks awfully familiar... Guy ( help!) 18:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
I have been waiting for your diffs, but now I have taken action already, SPI filed. – Austronesier ( talk) 18:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey, if you think a page should be deleted you could either start an AFD or request speedy deletion. Idan ( talk) 14:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Logical Man 2000. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mech people without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't remove cited content of padmasri awardee scholar Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 12:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Logical Man 2000. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mech people have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. If you'll not stop pushing your POV then i'll go for WP:ANI Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 13:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
No modern scholar use this Note on the Tribal Name "Mes (Mech)" Stuart N. Wolfenden . This is just arbitrary guess without proper investigation. It is WP:FRINGE. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 10:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Boro people, you may be blocked from editing. If you don't know history of Boro then don't edit anything related to Boro people. Please stop doing disruptive edits. Boro culture is different from your culture. Boros have much more than you could even imagine. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 08:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Please create a new page called Mech-Kachari people , then all the problem will be solved. Mech-Kachari are ST-Hill in Nagaland, So they identify separately. They can't leave Kachari word for ST-Hill , They can't join Boro for ST-Hill. Historically, Kachari and Mech are names of two different region. Mech aren't Kachari and Kachari aren't Mech in History but they are same people. Among them most people call themselves Boro. Other call themselves Sarania Kachari, Sonowal Kachari , Thengal Kachari , Mech Kachari , Dimasa Kachari etc Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 16:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Mech Kachari speak Assamese. Historical Mech and Kachari are names given by other. But today Kachari is also divided. Mech is also divided. Nobody can claim they are the entire Kachari or entire Mech. We can keep this page and we can also create Mech-Kachari. Mech is just like Kachari. Many Rajbongshi are Mech. We can divide Mech into Boro , Rajbongshi and Mech-Kachari Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 17:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
There was no community called Indian. But now we call ourselves Indian. Now Indian is self-designation, It doesn't mean we don't have other designation. This is basic thing. S.N. Wolfened took from grierson. Grierson took information from Bengali clerks. This is how confusion occured. He hadn't done field work. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 17:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Okay! 'Mech' and 'Mech-Kachari' two are different now. So Pages should be created soon separately for these two's. Thank you Eulerfan1999 ( talk) 18:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
All 'Mech' peoples i.e., Mech people of 'West Bengal' speaks Bodo as their mother tongue And identify themselves as Bodo/boro But All 'Mech-kachari' are partially Kacharies and different than 'Mech'. So New page should be created soon. Eulerfan1999 ( talk) 19:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
I've undone several of your edits at Chutia people because you didn't provide a source. When editing, please find reliable sources first, write a citation for them (see Help:Footnotes to learn how), and then add your changes to the article along with the footnotes at the same time. Please respect Wikipedia's core principle of WP:Verifiability. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my Talk page. Thanks, Mathglot ( talk) 08:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on People of Assam; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. भास्कर् Bhagawati संवाद 21:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
I edited added the information into talk page of Bodo-Kachari. Bodo Kachari is currently only to address the Boro/Bodo tribe. Other Kacharis are not known as Bodo-Kacharis, but only as 'Kacharis'. Tribes like Sonowal, Thengal, Dimasas, Sarania etc aren't considered as Bodo/Boro but instead Kacharis. Tizen03 ( talk) 10:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Atleast adding the word 'Kachari' after the word Bodo-Kachari is possible right ? Tizen03 ( talk) 16:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, I need your help in creating a new Wikipedia article for 'Ahomization'. Currently there's no Wiki page for that. Tizen03 ( talk) 16:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, check the Ahomisation page again. That's all the information I was able to find. If you have some more information, you can add it as well. If its correct then publish it. Tizen03 ( talk) 12:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, should I remove the genetics part or should I leave as it is. Tizen03 ( talk) 08:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Chaipau help me in the process of creating this 'Ahomisation' page. As I'm actually on a tight shedule, also I'm not that experienced in Wiki editing. Tizen03 ( talk) 11:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Chaipau: The Ahomisation page have enough content now. Should I move the draft to article now ? Tizen03 ( talk) 12:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
I've been busy filling up the pages of these Tai languages in Assam, besides Ahom, such as Aiton, Phake, Khamti. They're finally starting to have some content. Glennznl ( talk) 13:50, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Zayeem (talk) 15:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
You are most welcome.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 09:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Chaipau! I already discussed with you that mythological and mythical are similar words. That article does not have only one source. Mythological is more suitable word for these kind of characters which are found in scriptures. Ratan375 ( talk) 19:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
I wonder what's your problem! That Bhagavata Purana citation is not reliable since its only have verse. That's why I replaced the with https://books.google.co.in/books?id=fb_VDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT70&dq=narakasura+mythological&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi71eeX7ZPrAhVTILcAHWMmAucQ6AEITjAF#v=onepage&q=narakasura%20Varaha&f=false
And I changed location of a ( Sircar 1990:80) </ref> this source because it's mention about Narakasura's successor. So this source is more suitable for that line. Ratan375 ( talk) 19:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Sircar is not God that whatever he writes you have to copy, when other citations clearly mentioned it as mythological story. Mythology is a less offensive word for a particular community. Mythology means a collection of myth. It's a best word for modern era. Ratan375 ( talk) 01:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
A mythical entity is an entity in a myth. Mythology is the study of myths. It's also true that "mythical" and "mythological" are commonly used as synonyms, but if we are to maintain the, slightly useful, distinction between the two words, Sircar is using the correct one. Richard Keatinge ( talk) 06:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
I have met you in a bitter dispute and an ANI, not the best places to meet, and certainly no place experience and enjoy the good work you have done. But from the little I have seen, you are probably awesome.
I am here to request you that at the ANI stay true to the complaint you went there with - hostile edits at articles on Bengali-Assamese language/script. You have a valid complaint there, and you don't need to get muddled into discussions about Liberations Wars and stuff. If someone has a problem with the person you are complaining about, they definitely can take it outside. No need to get pulled into somewhat childish debates about topic-bans. Even if the person deserves a topic ban, you ANI is not a place for that discussion. I would rather offer my assistance to develop the articles in dispute. And I think I agree to your stand on those articles.
Thanks for reading this. The last few disputes and debates I have seen are so painful and upsetting, as well as a total wastage of time and energy! Here let me offer a cup of tea (to the Chaiwala, the irony). I hope its not as bad as my talk page comments. Aditya( talk • contribs) 02:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
The comment I made was directed not to you but to Srijanx22 who claimed that I was misrepresenting sources. I think the source can be interpreted in different ways, I interpreted it as the Rajbanshis are using a form of earlier script which they could call their own and which has some similarities with Assamese alphabet but not entirely Assamese. You interpreted it as Rajbanshis are using Assamese alphabets which I respect, but was it really a WP:CIR on my part? You also said I help Wikipedia in nothing but just few comments above, another editor said I helped him create an article while one of my articles has been approved for DYK. You do know that I'm in a position where I at least have to refute the arguments who are supporting a ban against me. Za-ari-masen ( talk) 17:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't Assamese phonology be a completely different page ? A lot of other languages have a separate page for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tizen03 ( talk • contribs) 16:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Chaipau: Regarding Ahomisation Do I have to manually add the article (by moving it to draft first) for review ? I haven't created any article from scratch before, so please help me on this one. Tizen03 ( talk) 11:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Chaipau: But last time I didn't submit it for review, I just moved it from draft to main space. And a lot of articles says I need to submit it for review first. Moreover the article wasn't showing in Google search, so I thought it was because of this reason. So what should I do now ? Move it back to main space or let it stay this way for review ? Tizen03 ( talk) 16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Aditya Kabir: Sure you can. The more contributors the better. Tizen03 ( talk) 19:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
I have some stuff on me that I am going to put into the article. Please, be there, check if they are appropriate, and make ncessary changes (or suggest necessary changes).
BTW, my little research on this has increased my conviction that Assamese is the mother language to Bengali, the language that became more influential with help from our colonial overlords. Do you have any idea where I can get a copy of The Evolution of Assamese Script by Mahendra Bara? Aditya( talk • contribs) 08:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Luwanglinux ( talk) 15:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Ah for God's sake how many time should I tell you Meitei is an ethnic group. this is not about language.our language is presently known as Manipuri language officially
Your recent editing history at Bengali–Assamese languages shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. भास्कर् Bhagawati संवाद 07:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Rudra-Singha-Jayata-Kachari-inCourt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
(Sarma 2016:76–77)It was built by Chokrodoz (Chakradhvaj), 4th raja of Cachar but long subsequent to the erection of Ghergong in the Jorhat district. (Wade 1997:130) A Chinese plate was found in Jorhat which was deciphered and found to be the verification tally issued in the fifth year o-f the Yong-le reign (1407/08) to the "Di-ma-sa Pacification Superintendency". Historical records clearly prove Dimasa had capital at Jorhat before Dimapur. Why are you trying to remove this part ? 2409:4065:20C:A3F6:18A1:9A5F:9452:ECA4 ( talk) 12:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Pre-16th century's Ahom kingdom was originally part of Dimasa kingdom. Ahom invaded Dimasa and Dimasa had to move westward. Cachar was originally part of Twipra kingdom. 2409:4065:20C:A3F6:C927:FC57:2D2D:69B1 ( talk) 14:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
If the rajbongshi population shows more in West Bengal's scheduled Cast figure then we will follow that. Eulerfan1999 ( talk) 11:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Happy Diwali!!! | ||
Sky full of fireworks, Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous
Diwali.
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! | |
Hello Chaipau, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
This would also apply to Chhattisgarhi, right? What do you think, move back per BRD? – Austronesier ( talk) 11:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Chaipau,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 08:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
I believe it is better to replace ethnic identifiers (Assamese, Bengali, Odishan, etc) from the this with the nationalities. What do you say? - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 16:27, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Dear Chaipau, how are you? You added a reference {{harvcol|Wade|1997|p=220}}
in
Dimasa Kingdom
[4]. Could you please tell me the book's name? Thanks so much.--
Xiliuheshui ·
chat 00:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islamic Invasions of Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
All 'Mech' peoples i.e., Mech people of 'West Bengal' speaks Bodo as their mother tongue And identify themselves as Bodo/Boro But 'Mech-kachari' peoples are partially Kacharies and different than 'Mech'. So New page should be created differently for this two's soon. Eulerfan1999 ( talk) 19:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
I already given valid citetion. Eulerfan1999 ( talk) 20:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Chaipau. This is Gazal world from Gujarat. I just wanted to know that do you know Boro language ? OR do you know any person here who knows Boro? I need a small help regarding Boro language. I want to get written a Boro book title into Hindi. Thanks. -- Gazal world ( talk) 19:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Stop manipulating Ahom History related pages otherwise I will make sure this doesn't get unnoticed by the descendants. 11Anonymous1122 ( talk) 23:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Don't you think that you should get your facts clear before making any changes. If you search in google you'll get the actual facts about the first Borpatrogohain. 11Anonymous1122 ( talk) 23:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supimphaa
Check this out before clicking the undo option. 11Anonymous1122 ( talk) 23:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Since you wanted clarification. These are some of the facts from Assamese History Books.
https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1455574801282396&id=100004896692397&set=a.1056539917852555
https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1447189865454223&id=100004896692397&set=a.1056539917852555
https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1352904591549418&id=100004896692397&set=a.1056539917852555
11Anonymous1122 (
talk) 11:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
I would like to go through this Book
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=HyD5DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT216&lpg=PT216&dq=kancheng+Borpatragohain&source=bl&ots=o4wAPsfWGY&sig=ACfU3U0XGALQiVWhMzyNkPX2i_SnP6Tpiw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi3_L_TjpnvAhV6wzgGHc_cCsgQ6AEwEnoECBEQAg#v=onepage&q=kancheng%20Borpatragohain&f=false 11Anonymous1122 ( talk) 13:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Information provided in passing by an otherwise reliable source that is not related to the principal topics of the publication may not be reliable. It does not cite the source of the claim it is making either. Please provide another reference. Chaipau ( talk) 15:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Chaipau. I hope that you are in a good health. Recently, when I read the articles on KRNB lects and Goalparia dialects, I was confused whether both the lects are one and the same, or are different from each other. Since these lects are spoken approximately in the same region (North Bengal, West Assam), it becomes very difficult to differentiate them. Can you please clear my doubts? I will be very grateful to you. Thank you! Mahakaal2003 ( talk) 13:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I would like you to check this edit by the IP. This IP had tried modifying and adding OR before in this article and the related ethnic group before. I've reverted the Grierson part since it is sourced, but not the better tag they added. Please take a look. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 07:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
I agree with you. Syloti language should be free of Bengali Master Vampire Shihab ( talk) 20:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
You removed the citation of Chutiya jatir Buranji with A Comprehensive History of Assam not releasing that these two authors are the same - Swarnalata Baruah. The same author in Chutiya jatir Buranji in 2004 claims that Habung to be under Chutia domain!! Homogenie ( talk) 20:18, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
The chutias were offered schedule tribe status not schedule caste in 1950s. Our leaders made a mistake of not accepting it. And they khels are originally chutia clans. Sarbananda singha of matak kingdom was a chutia of buruk clan, kanaklata Barua the Assamese independeence activist waa a chutia whose original was Kanaklata dolakasharia. Dolakasharia and khanikar , bharali are found in chutias were originally chutia clans later used by ahoms. Source sarbananda singha of buruk clan - http://atributetosankaradeva.org/mayamara.pdf page 13
Sarbananda singha claim was buruk chutia written clearly in matak and their kindom page 31!! http://ignca.gov.in/Asi_data/72269.pdf And may i ask why is Chutiya jatir burnaji by a Phd author not reliable? Homogenie ( talk) 15:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
There are various accounts and succession lists of the rulers of the Chutiyãs (I do not call them Chutiyã kings precisely because in these accounts they are not described as Chutiyãs except the last one of them) with dates also assigned to their reign ; but these accounts are too much at variance with one another to deserve serious consideration as being of proper historical value.), D Nath (
[T]his so called ancient chronicle might have been a later work of some members of the Chutiya aristocracy, as is possibly an attempt to legitimize the claims of the Chutiyas over a part of Assam during the establishment of the Matak kingdom in the beginning of the 19th century (1805) or after the Ahom power was abolished.), R Buragohain (
The legends relating to the origin of the Chutiyas is full of absurdities without any historical moorings.) and even S L Baruah. There are no historical basis for these claims. Chutiya Jatir Buranji is an extension of these legends, even though it is "edited" by S L Baruah---but it is published by a political organization with a political agenda, a handbook of sorts for a political movement. That is why it is not reliable. Chaipau ( talk) 17:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Neog, D Nath, R Buragohain and S L Baruah wrote about the rulers list to be full of absurdities!! What is have to do with Chutia clans!! If Mishing had a list of rulers which is full of absurdities and than someone writes about the mishing clans!! So the because the rulers list of rulers were legendary that means the mishing clans dont exist??!! And books are bias more of them are!! Before Jae Eun Shin all the Kamrupa kings were Indo Aryan now all of them have before Tibeto Burman. So whose is reliable?? What will Kamarupa kings later become.!?? It seems that most authors were liars or unreliable??! Its seems most reliable authors were being politically motivated for last 100 years!! It seems some authors were systematically liars who books were taught as history in schools and colleges!! So now whose books will you consider a truth or whose books a liar And it is already written it was "ORIGINALLY" divided into clans!! You wouldnt find this in cities would you !! Visit villages in eastern Assam in dhemaji. Homogenie ( talk) 23:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tripura Buranji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
TrangaBellam ( talk) 19:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tripura Buranji. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TrangaBellam ( talk) 13:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Back in 2012, you added a short cite to "Baruah 1983" but no such source is listed in the bibliography. Is that a typo in year? Can you please add?
Additionally, Ahomisation is missing full citations for Boruah 2007, Gait 1887, and Phukan 2010. I did not check who added them, but would you be able to track them down?
Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]]
to
your common.js page. Thanks,
Renata (
talk) 03:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Chaipau. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bijni Kingdom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 04:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Koch is not a Indo aryan tribe. The language clearly falls under Tibeto burman language. I provided source for it . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homogenie ( talk • contribs) 15:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. UserNumber ( talk) 17:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RFC Statement. Thank you. TrangaBellam ( talk) 22:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. TrangaBellam ( talk) 06:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Chaipau. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Migrations to Assam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics in the past year that there is a new request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics § RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?. Nardog ( talk) 10:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Peopling of Assam section is filled with lots of speculations and some unprovable claims. Shouldn't we write about peoples of assam in 1st century ? It's historically correct. Kirata isn't only IA term in the page like Brahmans, Aryan etc are also IA terms. KPAhmed ( talk) 20:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Chaipu, but what is the source for Gait 1887 and Phukan 2010 on Ahomisation? Dangling refs are showing up on Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. - Aussie Article Writer ( talk) 18:50, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Kautilya3 ( talk) 03:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on McMahon Line. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 ( talk) 16:45, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Please check the wiki page for maharani Gayatri Devi, it is already mentioned there that she is from a koch-rajbongshi family. So inclusion of these notable people should not be removed. Some random guy edited the page and removed this info and now everyone is after removing already verified inclusion. Please edit with an neutral point of view. Robo Zay ( talk) 10:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Please continue discussion here: Talk:Rajbanshi_people#Notable_people. Chaipau ( talk) 13:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Chaipau. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bijni Raj Estate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Read J B Bhattacharjee s pre colonial political structures of Barak valley to know about pre colonial Bengalis of Barak valley. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 07:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Only Karimganj is from the Sylhet region, not the rest of "Barak valley". The history the non-Karimganj region is well known and mentioned in the article: Tripura kingdom → Khaspur of the Dehans → Kachari kingdom. If you want to document the settlement of people from Sylhet by these powers, please do so, but use WP:RS.
But if some people from Barak valley worship Kechaikhati from Sadiya, it might mean they, or at least some of them, are from Brahmaputra valley not Sylhet—even if they speak Sylheti language. The term "Sodial" could be derived from Sadiya.
Also, the people who were settled by the Kachari kings will likely retain the landed titles from the Kachari king, not the landed titles from Sylhet. It is only those who immigrated on their own will retain their landed titles from Sylhet. Chaipau ( talk) 09:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
The Bengali people of Barak valley adopted the worship of Kachakanti Devi from Barman Kacharis.The Barman Kacharis are related to Dimasa Kacharis,Bodo Kacharis,Chutiyas and Deoris etc. Moreover the Mirashdari system was modeled after the revenue system of Bengal. Sodial is generally used by Bengali Muslims of Cachar - Hailakandi region. You can search for people with the surname Sodial on Facebook. Plus Dimasa Kachari Kingdom and Ahom Kingdom were rivals. Why are you so reluctant to accept that there were Bengali people in Cachar-Hailakandi region in the pre independence period? The presence of Bengali people in Barak valley is well documented. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
I know that Barak valley was ruled by Tripura Kingdom then Koch Rajbongshi dynasty of Khaspur and then Dimasa Kachari kingdom. It is possible for cultures to be influenced by one another. Just like the Bengali (Sylheti) culture of Cachar- Hailakandi region was influenced by Dimasa Kachari / Barman Kachari Culture. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
The Brahmin priests of Kachakanti temple in Udharbond are Bengali Brahmins whose ancestors came from Sylhet during the Dimasa Kachari period. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
By the 1700's century, the Dimasa Kachari rule extended into the plains of Cachar. The plains people did not participate in the courts of the Dimasa Kachari king directly. They were organized according to khels, and the king provided justice and collected revenue via an official called the Uzir. Though the plains people did not participate in the Dimasa Kachari royal court, the Dharmadhi guru and other Brahmins in the court cast a considerable influence, especially with the beginning of the 18th century. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
The Khels were organise on the basis of Caste and religion. The khel was headed by a Choudhary under whom there were Barbhuiyas Followed by Mazarbhuiyas, Barlaskars and Laskars. The Uzirs or Mazumdars were incharge of revenue collection. The Deshmukhyas were land surveyors. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
The Patras and Bhandaris ( Ministers) led by BaraBhandari ( Prime Minister) we're exclusively Dimasa Kachari and in rare cases Koch Rajbongshi. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
@ Truthfulsoldier: please follow up here: Talk:Barak_Valley#Immigration/Refugee. Chaipau ( talk) 14:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
I have recently made a draft about ahom war against kachari and Jaintia kingdom. /info/en/?search=Draft:Ahom_expedition_of_Jaintia_and_Kachari_Kingdoms.... I need some help and more references and sources .. If you can edit and add some more sources it will really help. Can you please suggest me some books's about Ahom history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonardondishant ( talk • contribs) 09:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Sir, I have seen your work in editing Ahom related pages on Wikipedia. You're doing a good job. Can you write about 'Rajkonwar' surname? Because people with Rajkonwar surname are actually direct descendants of the first Ahom King Chaloung Sukapha, and are Prince of the erstwhile Ahom Kingdom. So there must be a page or atleast a category on them. AccurateInformation2004 ( talk) 14:55, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Faster than Thunder. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dimasa Kingdom without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You removed 1,594 bytes to be exact. Faster than Thunder ( talk | contributions | block) 15:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello sir! Please help urgently, someone has been vandalizing the wiki page for Ahom kingdom.... Please take strict action as soon as possible . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonardondishant ( talk • contribs) 06:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the puppy. Kitteh for you . Good Night.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 20:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Excuse me, You've reverted my edit. But that's just one view. There are other views too and that source itself is just claiming someone else's claim. It would look better without such claims. Northeast heritage ( talk) 11:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
There are other views too. Also the Manikpha name is taken from Kachari Buranji which isn't reliable source. Northeast heritage ( talk) 15:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bodo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boro language.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey there, some has distroted the facts of the the Battle of Alaboi , I request you to restore the page as soon as possible. Vishwanath2008 ( talk) 06:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
The numbers which are shown are not correct also just add the numbers who actually fought in the battle not the total force Jonardondishant ( talk) 10:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi . You
added a quote to
Ahom kingdom with the reference Baruah 1983
. However there is no 1983 work by Baruah in the article, did you mean 1986's A Comprehensive History of Assam or 1993's Last Days of Ahom Monarchy? Both of these are already defined in the references section. Could you let me know which work you meant, and I'll coorect the error? -- LCU
ActivelyDisinterested ∆
transmissions∆ °
co-ords° 15:19, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
You have added that, persecution of Shudra mahanta's started from the reign of Siva Singha and Tungkhungia kings, which is completely false and subjective. Since Pratap Singha their disciples and the Shudra Mahantas were persecuted. One eg of it is- 'Jayaditya Singha had executed the Mayamara Mahanta by an executioner, and threwed his body in the river. However, his body was rescued by a old women whom she gave to their disciples'. Please refer to- Last days of Ahom Monarchy and Matak and their kingdom.
Also execlusively by Shudra Mahanta they mean the Mayamara Mahanta, other shudra Mahanta had received patronage from the kings and the nobles like of 'Dihing'. Vishwanath2008 ( talk) 14:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
I am not being apologist to the tungkhungia's, nor I am justifying the sevre and tyrannical actions taken against rebels. I have not even edited the text of that. The seeds of the downfall was long sown by the preceding kings (before Siva Singha), and the seeds grew to give fruits during Lakshmi Singha reign, which he couldn't control in anyway being, because of those same old massacaring, which made the people more upset. Also nor could any aristocrat thought image of this, because anytime in past they had taken them out of troubles by any means.
Leaving all aside my main topic was about under whoes reign the shudras were first persecuted, you have wrote in a way by which it seems that all the Shudra Mahanta persecuting thing only started from the reign of Siva Singha.
Vishwanath2008 ( talk) 15:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Phuleswari insult to Mayamata Mahanta lightly might have affected the new Mahanta Astabhuj. Astabhuj referred the Ahom raja as his father till very late. And the first rebellion was organised by the disciples of the Mayamara Satra, not some other Satra, however later on point it inspired many oppressed subjects to take arms against the government. Vishwanath2008 ( talk) 16:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Will appreciate you keeping a tab. Best, TrangaBellam ( talk) 16:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Chaipau! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Hinduism several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Hinduism, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 ( talk) 17:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
You always revert edits!! And add low quality bad photos. Orang srang17 ( talk) 14:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Very fascinating guy. Was quite perplexed about whether his own documentary supported Love Jihad or not :3 TrangaBellam ( talk) 15:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Phongsawadan Tai-Ahom: Ahorn Buranji [Tai-Ahom Chronicles], 2 Vols. Transcribed and translated by RENU WICHASIN. Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing Ltd. Pp. xxiv, 993 [Continuous Pagination]. Map, Photos, Tables, Glossary. [In Thai]
Reviewed over here. Do you have a copy? TrangaBellam ( talk) 07:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
The section Violence_against_Muslims_in_India#1983_Nellie_massacre reads completely different to the Nellie massacre page. Hope you can do something about it. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 18:08, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Please read Northeast heritage ( talk) 12:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Constitutional order is primary source and simply gives list. It doesn't say anything about actual ethnic group. So there must be secondary source to claim - Boros are listed as ... Also these are not give under quotation mark so it is misleading because nobody uses "Boro, Borokachari". Northeast heritage ( talk) 06:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
MBlaze Lightning ( talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 09:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
You had added an argument of Bareh's claim in some articles.
"Other scholars have pointed out that other river names such as Dibang, Dihang, Doyang and the like were mixture of Bodo di and -ong (Austric) which means water." (Bareh 1987:269–270)
Austric is proposed language family encompassing Austronesian and Austroasiatic languages. Neither "ong" means "water" in Khasi languages nor "ong" is Proto-Austroasiatic construction. Is it not a fringe theory? Does his claim belong to Wikipedia because he doesn't seem to refer any expert scholar? Northeast heritage ( talk) 13:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Please have a look at this change as well as the discussion about this in the talk page. Such identifiers are unnecessary. - 117.201.119.23 ( talk) 18:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, If the Author, J N Sarkar, of some chapters of "The Comprehensive History of Assam" is the same person as Jadunath Sarkar who died in 1958, Could you please tell me his original articles regarding those chapters? Actually, I don't have the book. Northeast heritage ( talk) 06:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Reading his thesis makes me feel like I am reading your arguments on Boro identity formation. http://gyan.iitg.ernet.in/handle/123456789/2261?show=full Northeast heritage ( talk) 16:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Do you have any solid evidence regarding this ? If you don't have any evidence for you claim, Please avoid nurturing prejudice. Northeast heritage ( talk) 19:07, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Tribe-by-tribe depictions of the North-East undoubtedly stem from a nineteenth century European vision of human diversity which in many aspects converged with local representations. In this respect, colonial censuses have greatly contributed to the freezing of categories although its precise role in ethnogenesis has recently come under debate.
p1.Colonial knowledge production and classificatory practices assigned a place for the Boros within a racialised hierarchy.
Prior to the coming of the British and being subjected to their ethnological inquiries and census enumerations, Boros were, what could be termed as a 'fuzzy' but 'practically precise' community sharing kinship ties in the Northeastern region of the Indian sub-continent.
You asked me to search for Kamaika (phonetically Khamaikha) in a PhD thesis which is all about Bathouist version of Bathouism. There is no mention of a single Hindu deity. Also it is folkloristic study, foklores are continuously being made and remande. There is be no mention of Khamaikha (Kamakhya) because She is now part of Hinduism. I wasted my time searching for Her in PhD thesis.
I consulted a Boro researcher. He told that Endle and Hodgson mention about Ai-deo / Ai and C A Soppit in his book "An Historical and Descriptive Account of the Kachari Tribes in the North Cachar Hills: With Specimens of Tales and Folk-lore" mentions bato , Kamaika etc when he compares Boro pantheon with Dimasa pantheon. I varified Endle and Hodgson but I could not read C A Soppitt's book. Also
Hodgson confirms that Ai means Kamakhya
Northeast heritage (
talk) 17:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For obvious reasons . Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 09:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Hi, it is regarding these additions. Do you think adding an unreferenced section tag would be a good idea? - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 20:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks again. This user with their 'canned summaries' again. While POV is there, in this case it looks like they tried replicating the source quote, though the flow of the sentence is a bit off IMO. What do you think? - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 19:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Please go through my edit summaries, I removed unsourced informations. Kindly assume good faith. Eduardo2024 ( talk) 14:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
Hello,
You are invited to participate in a dispute resolution regarding contents of 2023 Manipur violence.
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#2023 Manipur violence Tms369 ( talk) 05:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Regarding this edit. Shouldn't we stick to the sources or are we suppose to be more precise as in the change. I mean it is entirely possible that other branches of AA or TB, like some form of Mundari or a non-Bodo-Kachari language may have been spoken in ancient Kamarupa. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 16:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Chaipau, I will be mostly offline for about a week starting today. I hope you can take care of all the discussions where we are both involved. If agreements cannot be reached, please feel free to start RfCs. Thanks. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 12:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Some heavy reading here. [19] :-) -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 08:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
@ Chaipau, hello, I am here to discuss regarding the historicity of Bagh Hazarika's wikipedia page. The whole page is devoid of any reliable sources, it's completely made of pov led e-articles which proves nothing about his originality or historicity of his character.
Please if you get some time to spare, read this thesis, Ch 8, page 299 to 301. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/66700 Ch ComparingQuantities ( talk) 07:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
Please have a look at these changes. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 10:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
In Ahom history, It is said that Borahis were completely absorbed into Ahom fold. Could you tell me which Assamese Buranjis mention that event? Northeast heritage ( talk) 17:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as
contentious topics:
|
Chaipau,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 10:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Please don't revert sourced content of Dimasa Kingdom. Dhruv Hojai ( talk) 11:14, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bengali–Assamese languages; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Za-ari-masen ( talk) 09:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
This is just book. Different tribe have different folklore. Baraha is title not Barahi subtribe of chutia. So, Is there any Barahi in Cachar ? Cachar name itself originate from Kachari. Just like Varman ,Pala, Khen are just dynasty name. Similarly baraha is just dynasty. It doesn't mean different should be seperate tribe. Is there any sworgodeo tribe ? Dhruv Hojai ( talk) 17:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Do you have any evidence of Sukafa except your Buranjis ? Similarly we have our historical evidence of hachengsa dynasty who ruled kamarupa. Hachengsa means earth-born. What is your problem with our history ? Why are you deleting claims of Historian in support of Bodo-Kachari ? Dhruv Hojai ( talk) 06:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Ha=land , Tsung= cheng = split , tsa=sa=son=born , hachengsa = earth-born, Kamarupa means Kachari kingdom. Kalika puran Mahiranga = Mairong deity of Kacharis , Kalika puran , Tripura Rajmala etc have Kachari history. We don't lack evidence , We lack proper research. Dhruv Hojai ( talk) 11:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC) @ Chaipau: Hachengsa family deserve a place in kamarupa kingdom because it's royal claim and achaeologically evident. Hachengsa means earth-born. Dhruv Hojai ( talk) 11:52, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
In your recent edit in Assamese literature ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/937987696) you changed "Ancient era" to "Early Assamese", but this ancient era is actually Kamarupi Prakrit (aka Old Assamese as mentioned by Chaterjee). Early Assamese comes in "Medieval era" of Pre-Vaishnava/Pre-Sankari and Vaishnava/Sankari perids. Then Middle Assamese comes under the "post-Sankari period (1700-1826)". Msasag ( talk) 19:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
I declined your speedy deletion request on Greater Kamrup, since it doesn't meet the definition of blatant hoax. In your edit summary you mentioned WP:POVFORK. Those are not speedyable, especially for one that's been around for seven years already. If you feel it should be deleted, feel free to take it to AfD (I will contest a prod not because I feel it must stay but because I think this needs discussion).---- Fabrictramp | talk to me 04:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bijni kingdom, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:45, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
You have been removing content related to Boro people. Your act is against a community. I don't think Wikipedia allow this type of Behavior. If you'll keep repeating same behaviour then you may be blocked DinaBasumatary ( talk) 08:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Dimasa aren't Boro and Boro aren't Dimasa. Don't you understand English ? Go and read what is written in Kakoty research. It's related to memoir of Sylhet and Cachar... That paper talk about Kacharis of Cachar. Ramsa migrated from Cachar to Plain. You've no right to distort Boro History. Your act against Bodo community is not acceptable as per Wikipedia rule DinaBasumatary ( talk) 10:25, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
You've removed Boro from Mahamanikya page also. That claim was backed by modern scholar. Read it. Sen, Debasis (1984). "ETHNIC ELEMENTS IN THE POLITICAL LIFE OF ANCIENT ASSAM". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 45: 101–106. DinaBasumatary ( talk) 10:29, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Who is mixing ? Bodo = Boro. Don't you know pronunciation ? DinaBasumatary ( talk) 13:21, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
If you are a literate person then just look at census of all the districts of Assam.
Don't talk like a jealous person. DinaBasumatary ( talk) 13:52, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
You have cited Bathari very much. So, Add batharis claim about river crossing . That happened between Dimasa and Moran. Gogoi assumption of Kachari ghat is mistake. DinaBasumatary ( talk) 11:02, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boro–Garo languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creole ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
You are welcome. Have some tea! (offering tea to the chai guy ) Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:58, 30 March 2020 (UTC) |
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Yunshui
雲
水 14:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)I've lifted the block; since the opposite party has now been blocked as a sockpuppet and since your message on my talkpage clearly showed that you recognised the problems with your own approach, I see no likelihood of the edit war continuing and thus no reason to maintain a block on editing the article. Yunshui 雲 水 09:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Since, Boro is phonetically better. Don't you think , Bodo-Kacharis page should be moved to Boro-Kacharis ? Scholars used Bodo with Boro pronunciation. S.K. Chatterjee, Grierson , Endle clarified the exact pronunciation. Thank you 2409:4065:12:5789:E080:12CE:BAE1:C42F ( talk) 18:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
There is a problem in statement related first publication of Bodo word. Martin Montgomery(1838) in The history, antiquities, topography, and statistics of eastern India writes that Proper name of Kacharis is Boro.(page 549) 2409:4065:8D:ED9F:106:B716:BEBA:D92A ( talk) 05:39, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
I semiprotected the Bodo-Kachari article as the IPv6 is clearly either Qwertywander or Sairg. Please ping me or WP:ANI if you spot any more. The latest sock to be blocked was Paragkumardas ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Guy ( help!) 12:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cerebellum ( talk) 02:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)I think you misunderstood my edit. I'm not linking Mahamanikya with Khalang or Borahi because Khalang Borahi were Chutiya and Barāha of Nagaon were Kachari. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 11:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Ok. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 11:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Is it require move entire Kachari kingdom to Dimasa kingdom as you did here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Kachari_Kingdom&redirect=no ? There were many small small Kachari kingdoms. Shin ignored beginning and took Hachengsa as base for Dimasa history. So, we can keep the confusion part as Kachari history. Some scholars confusingly connected Dimasa with Kachari kingdom of Ganeshguri. We can keep these unclear history in Kachari kingdom page. Thanks Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 09:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
"Neolithic correlates of ancient Tibeto-Burman migrations" , This paper says many things about neolithic culture of Tibeto-Burman Northeast because many things discovered in northeast have relation with China. I would prefer to categorise Austroasiatic and Tibeto-burman within a new section "Neolithic" people of Assam Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 20:52, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Guha had written that Indo-Aryan brought wet rice , iron etc without any reference. How can we believe it's true ? And Taher, Mohammad (1993), "The Peopling of Assam and contemporary social structure" have mixed Bodo-Kachari with Monpas, Naga etc. Naga itself is mysterious name for many different tribes. If you've better source then please add it. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 09:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
I would suggest you not keep tagging everything with Bodo-kachari peoples. It's no more racial group. Garo of hills were headhunter. Dimasa had completely different culture from Boro. Koch-Rajbongshi is confusing. So, Please be specific instead of mixing everything. Just like Pre-historic or medieval Indo-Aryan don't want to be categorised with Recent Bangladeshi immigrants. Infact, There is lots of opposition to Bodo or Bodo-kachari umbrella from other groups. Anybody can learn a language. Scholars have already suggested that Boro-Garo was kind of lingua franca. So, Based on language we can never say everybody were same people. Thanks Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 12:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Don't remove cited content as you did here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Boro_people&diff=954219881&oldid=954216885 . If you have any problem then seek concensus from other editors Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 09:15, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
@ Logical Man 2000: I did not understand how I am erasing the hardwork and sacrifice of Boros. Chaipau ( talk) 10:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
You have either twisted or removed most things which goes in favour of Boro. Since, Mech word is related to founder of Koch kingdom. You opposed merge of Mech with Boro. Since, Varaha have relation with Boro. You removed the information from etymology. You can carry on. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 10:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Roman script isn't enough to represent all the letters of Varnamala. Bodo and Boro will go in parallel just like Assam and Axom Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 10:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
We are talking about people. We can create different page for language. Within Boro there are four dialects. I'm talking about Mech people. You are talking about language. There is difference. No mech of Goalpara or Original Mech call themselves mech. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 11:46, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Dimasa also have hojai language and different certificate. These aren't real name of community. These are just by product. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 12:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Do you understand meaning of etymology ? If you don't know then please check it. BTW , Here Assam#Etymology, you've defined Ahom. Do you have any personal problem with Boro people ? Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 17:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Since, Bodo or Bodo-Kachari is linguistic and anthropological term. Don't you think - we should change Bodo-Kachari_peoples to just Bodo-Kachari Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 10:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Ok, Thank you. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 12:30, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
That style looks awfully familiar... Guy ( help!) 18:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
I have been waiting for your diffs, but now I have taken action already, SPI filed. – Austronesier ( talk) 18:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey, if you think a page should be deleted you could either start an AFD or request speedy deletion. Idan ( talk) 14:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Logical Man 2000. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mech people without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't remove cited content of padmasri awardee scholar Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 12:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Logical Man 2000. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mech people have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. If you'll not stop pushing your POV then i'll go for WP:ANI Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 13:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
No modern scholar use this Note on the Tribal Name "Mes (Mech)" Stuart N. Wolfenden . This is just arbitrary guess without proper investigation. It is WP:FRINGE. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 10:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Boro people, you may be blocked from editing. If you don't know history of Boro then don't edit anything related to Boro people. Please stop doing disruptive edits. Boro culture is different from your culture. Boros have much more than you could even imagine. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 08:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Please create a new page called Mech-Kachari people , then all the problem will be solved. Mech-Kachari are ST-Hill in Nagaland, So they identify separately. They can't leave Kachari word for ST-Hill , They can't join Boro for ST-Hill. Historically, Kachari and Mech are names of two different region. Mech aren't Kachari and Kachari aren't Mech in History but they are same people. Among them most people call themselves Boro. Other call themselves Sarania Kachari, Sonowal Kachari , Thengal Kachari , Mech Kachari , Dimasa Kachari etc Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 16:23, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Mech Kachari speak Assamese. Historical Mech and Kachari are names given by other. But today Kachari is also divided. Mech is also divided. Nobody can claim they are the entire Kachari or entire Mech. We can keep this page and we can also create Mech-Kachari. Mech is just like Kachari. Many Rajbongshi are Mech. We can divide Mech into Boro , Rajbongshi and Mech-Kachari Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 17:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
There was no community called Indian. But now we call ourselves Indian. Now Indian is self-designation, It doesn't mean we don't have other designation. This is basic thing. S.N. Wolfened took from grierson. Grierson took information from Bengali clerks. This is how confusion occured. He hadn't done field work. Logical Man 2000 ( talk) 17:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Okay! 'Mech' and 'Mech-Kachari' two are different now. So Pages should be created soon separately for these two's. Thank you Eulerfan1999 ( talk) 18:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
All 'Mech' peoples i.e., Mech people of 'West Bengal' speaks Bodo as their mother tongue And identify themselves as Bodo/boro But All 'Mech-kachari' are partially Kacharies and different than 'Mech'. So New page should be created soon. Eulerfan1999 ( talk) 19:01, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
I've undone several of your edits at Chutia people because you didn't provide a source. When editing, please find reliable sources first, write a citation for them (see Help:Footnotes to learn how), and then add your changes to the article along with the footnotes at the same time. Please respect Wikipedia's core principle of WP:Verifiability. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my Talk page. Thanks, Mathglot ( talk) 08:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on People of Assam; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. भास्कर् Bhagawati संवाद 21:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
I edited added the information into talk page of Bodo-Kachari. Bodo Kachari is currently only to address the Boro/Bodo tribe. Other Kacharis are not known as Bodo-Kacharis, but only as 'Kacharis'. Tribes like Sonowal, Thengal, Dimasas, Sarania etc aren't considered as Bodo/Boro but instead Kacharis. Tizen03 ( talk) 10:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Atleast adding the word 'Kachari' after the word Bodo-Kachari is possible right ? Tizen03 ( talk) 16:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, I need your help in creating a new Wikipedia article for 'Ahomization'. Currently there's no Wiki page for that. Tizen03 ( talk) 16:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, check the Ahomisation page again. That's all the information I was able to find. If you have some more information, you can add it as well. If its correct then publish it. Tizen03 ( talk) 12:04, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, should I remove the genetics part or should I leave as it is. Tizen03 ( talk) 08:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Hey, Chaipau help me in the process of creating this 'Ahomisation' page. As I'm actually on a tight shedule, also I'm not that experienced in Wiki editing. Tizen03 ( talk) 11:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Chaipau: The Ahomisation page have enough content now. Should I move the draft to article now ? Tizen03 ( talk) 12:48, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
I've been busy filling up the pages of these Tai languages in Assam, besides Ahom, such as Aiton, Phake, Khamti. They're finally starting to have some content. Glennznl ( talk) 13:50, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Zayeem (talk) 15:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
You are most welcome.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 09:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Chaipau! I already discussed with you that mythological and mythical are similar words. That article does not have only one source. Mythological is more suitable word for these kind of characters which are found in scriptures. Ratan375 ( talk) 19:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
I wonder what's your problem! That Bhagavata Purana citation is not reliable since its only have verse. That's why I replaced the with https://books.google.co.in/books?id=fb_VDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT70&dq=narakasura+mythological&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi71eeX7ZPrAhVTILcAHWMmAucQ6AEITjAF#v=onepage&q=narakasura%20Varaha&f=false
And I changed location of a ( Sircar 1990:80) </ref> this source because it's mention about Narakasura's successor. So this source is more suitable for that line. Ratan375 ( talk) 19:56, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Sircar is not God that whatever he writes you have to copy, when other citations clearly mentioned it as mythological story. Mythology is a less offensive word for a particular community. Mythology means a collection of myth. It's a best word for modern era. Ratan375 ( talk) 01:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
A mythical entity is an entity in a myth. Mythology is the study of myths. It's also true that "mythical" and "mythological" are commonly used as synonyms, but if we are to maintain the, slightly useful, distinction between the two words, Sircar is using the correct one. Richard Keatinge ( talk) 06:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
I have met you in a bitter dispute and an ANI, not the best places to meet, and certainly no place experience and enjoy the good work you have done. But from the little I have seen, you are probably awesome.
I am here to request you that at the ANI stay true to the complaint you went there with - hostile edits at articles on Bengali-Assamese language/script. You have a valid complaint there, and you don't need to get muddled into discussions about Liberations Wars and stuff. If someone has a problem with the person you are complaining about, they definitely can take it outside. No need to get pulled into somewhat childish debates about topic-bans. Even if the person deserves a topic ban, you ANI is not a place for that discussion. I would rather offer my assistance to develop the articles in dispute. And I think I agree to your stand on those articles.
Thanks for reading this. The last few disputes and debates I have seen are so painful and upsetting, as well as a total wastage of time and energy! Here let me offer a cup of tea (to the Chaiwala, the irony). I hope its not as bad as my talk page comments. Aditya( talk • contribs) 02:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
The comment I made was directed not to you but to Srijanx22 who claimed that I was misrepresenting sources. I think the source can be interpreted in different ways, I interpreted it as the Rajbanshis are using a form of earlier script which they could call their own and which has some similarities with Assamese alphabet but not entirely Assamese. You interpreted it as Rajbanshis are using Assamese alphabets which I respect, but was it really a WP:CIR on my part? You also said I help Wikipedia in nothing but just few comments above, another editor said I helped him create an article while one of my articles has been approved for DYK. You do know that I'm in a position where I at least have to refute the arguments who are supporting a ban against me. Za-ari-masen ( talk) 17:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't Assamese phonology be a completely different page ? A lot of other languages have a separate page for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tizen03 ( talk • contribs) 16:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Chaipau: Regarding Ahomisation Do I have to manually add the article (by moving it to draft first) for review ? I haven't created any article from scratch before, so please help me on this one. Tizen03 ( talk) 11:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Chaipau: But last time I didn't submit it for review, I just moved it from draft to main space. And a lot of articles says I need to submit it for review first. Moreover the article wasn't showing in Google search, so I thought it was because of this reason. So what should I do now ? Move it back to main space or let it stay this way for review ? Tizen03 ( talk) 16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
@ Aditya Kabir: Sure you can. The more contributors the better. Tizen03 ( talk) 19:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
I have some stuff on me that I am going to put into the article. Please, be there, check if they are appropriate, and make ncessary changes (or suggest necessary changes).
BTW, my little research on this has increased my conviction that Assamese is the mother language to Bengali, the language that became more influential with help from our colonial overlords. Do you have any idea where I can get a copy of The Evolution of Assamese Script by Mahendra Bara? Aditya( talk • contribs) 08:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Luwanglinux ( talk) 15:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Ah for God's sake how many time should I tell you Meitei is an ethnic group. this is not about language.our language is presently known as Manipuri language officially
Your recent editing history at Bengali–Assamese languages shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. भास्कर् Bhagawati संवाद 07:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Rudra-Singha-Jayata-Kachari-inCourt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
(Sarma 2016:76–77)It was built by Chokrodoz (Chakradhvaj), 4th raja of Cachar but long subsequent to the erection of Ghergong in the Jorhat district. (Wade 1997:130) A Chinese plate was found in Jorhat which was deciphered and found to be the verification tally issued in the fifth year o-f the Yong-le reign (1407/08) to the "Di-ma-sa Pacification Superintendency". Historical records clearly prove Dimasa had capital at Jorhat before Dimapur. Why are you trying to remove this part ? 2409:4065:20C:A3F6:18A1:9A5F:9452:ECA4 ( talk) 12:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Pre-16th century's Ahom kingdom was originally part of Dimasa kingdom. Ahom invaded Dimasa and Dimasa had to move westward. Cachar was originally part of Twipra kingdom. 2409:4065:20C:A3F6:C927:FC57:2D2D:69B1 ( talk) 14:54, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
If the rajbongshi population shows more in West Bengal's scheduled Cast figure then we will follow that. Eulerfan1999 ( talk) 11:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Happy Diwali!!! | ||
Sky full of fireworks, Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous
Diwali.
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! | |
Hello Chaipau, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
This would also apply to Chhattisgarhi, right? What do you think, move back per BRD? – Austronesier ( talk) 11:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Chaipau,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 08:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
I believe it is better to replace ethnic identifiers (Assamese, Bengali, Odishan, etc) from the this with the nationalities. What do you say? - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 16:27, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Dear Chaipau, how are you? You added a reference {{harvcol|Wade|1997|p=220}}
in
Dimasa Kingdom
[4]. Could you please tell me the book's name? Thanks so much.--
Xiliuheshui ·
chat 00:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islamic Invasions of Assam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
All 'Mech' peoples i.e., Mech people of 'West Bengal' speaks Bodo as their mother tongue And identify themselves as Bodo/Boro But 'Mech-kachari' peoples are partially Kacharies and different than 'Mech'. So New page should be created differently for this two's soon. Eulerfan1999 ( talk) 19:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
I already given valid citetion. Eulerfan1999 ( talk) 20:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Chaipau. This is Gazal world from Gujarat. I just wanted to know that do you know Boro language ? OR do you know any person here who knows Boro? I need a small help regarding Boro language. I want to get written a Boro book title into Hindi. Thanks. -- Gazal world ( talk) 19:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Stop manipulating Ahom History related pages otherwise I will make sure this doesn't get unnoticed by the descendants. 11Anonymous1122 ( talk) 23:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Don't you think that you should get your facts clear before making any changes. If you search in google you'll get the actual facts about the first Borpatrogohain. 11Anonymous1122 ( talk) 23:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supimphaa
Check this out before clicking the undo option. 11Anonymous1122 ( talk) 23:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Since you wanted clarification. These are some of the facts from Assamese History Books.
https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1455574801282396&id=100004896692397&set=a.1056539917852555
https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1447189865454223&id=100004896692397&set=a.1056539917852555
https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1352904591549418&id=100004896692397&set=a.1056539917852555
11Anonymous1122 (
talk) 11:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
I would like to go through this Book
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=HyD5DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT216&lpg=PT216&dq=kancheng+Borpatragohain&source=bl&ots=o4wAPsfWGY&sig=ACfU3U0XGALQiVWhMzyNkPX2i_SnP6Tpiw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi3_L_TjpnvAhV6wzgGHc_cCsgQ6AEwEnoECBEQAg#v=onepage&q=kancheng%20Borpatragohain&f=false 11Anonymous1122 ( talk) 13:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Information provided in passing by an otherwise reliable source that is not related to the principal topics of the publication may not be reliable. It does not cite the source of the claim it is making either. Please provide another reference. Chaipau ( talk) 15:36, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Chaipau. I hope that you are in a good health. Recently, when I read the articles on KRNB lects and Goalparia dialects, I was confused whether both the lects are one and the same, or are different from each other. Since these lects are spoken approximately in the same region (North Bengal, West Assam), it becomes very difficult to differentiate them. Can you please clear my doubts? I will be very grateful to you. Thank you! Mahakaal2003 ( talk) 13:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I would like you to check this edit by the IP. This IP had tried modifying and adding OR before in this article and the related ethnic group before. I've reverted the Grierson part since it is sourced, but not the better tag they added. Please take a look. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 07:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
I agree with you. Syloti language should be free of Bengali Master Vampire Shihab ( talk) 20:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
You removed the citation of Chutiya jatir Buranji with A Comprehensive History of Assam not releasing that these two authors are the same - Swarnalata Baruah. The same author in Chutiya jatir Buranji in 2004 claims that Habung to be under Chutia domain!! Homogenie ( talk) 20:18, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
The chutias were offered schedule tribe status not schedule caste in 1950s. Our leaders made a mistake of not accepting it. And they khels are originally chutia clans. Sarbananda singha of matak kingdom was a chutia of buruk clan, kanaklata Barua the Assamese independeence activist waa a chutia whose original was Kanaklata dolakasharia. Dolakasharia and khanikar , bharali are found in chutias were originally chutia clans later used by ahoms. Source sarbananda singha of buruk clan - http://atributetosankaradeva.org/mayamara.pdf page 13
Sarbananda singha claim was buruk chutia written clearly in matak and their kindom page 31!! http://ignca.gov.in/Asi_data/72269.pdf And may i ask why is Chutiya jatir burnaji by a Phd author not reliable? Homogenie ( talk) 15:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
There are various accounts and succession lists of the rulers of the Chutiyãs (I do not call them Chutiyã kings precisely because in these accounts they are not described as Chutiyãs except the last one of them) with dates also assigned to their reign ; but these accounts are too much at variance with one another to deserve serious consideration as being of proper historical value.), D Nath (
[T]his so called ancient chronicle might have been a later work of some members of the Chutiya aristocracy, as is possibly an attempt to legitimize the claims of the Chutiyas over a part of Assam during the establishment of the Matak kingdom in the beginning of the 19th century (1805) or after the Ahom power was abolished.), R Buragohain (
The legends relating to the origin of the Chutiyas is full of absurdities without any historical moorings.) and even S L Baruah. There are no historical basis for these claims. Chutiya Jatir Buranji is an extension of these legends, even though it is "edited" by S L Baruah---but it is published by a political organization with a political agenda, a handbook of sorts for a political movement. That is why it is not reliable. Chaipau ( talk) 17:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Neog, D Nath, R Buragohain and S L Baruah wrote about the rulers list to be full of absurdities!! What is have to do with Chutia clans!! If Mishing had a list of rulers which is full of absurdities and than someone writes about the mishing clans!! So the because the rulers list of rulers were legendary that means the mishing clans dont exist??!! And books are bias more of them are!! Before Jae Eun Shin all the Kamrupa kings were Indo Aryan now all of them have before Tibeto Burman. So whose is reliable?? What will Kamarupa kings later become.!?? It seems that most authors were liars or unreliable??! Its seems most reliable authors were being politically motivated for last 100 years!! It seems some authors were systematically liars who books were taught as history in schools and colleges!! So now whose books will you consider a truth or whose books a liar And it is already written it was "ORIGINALLY" divided into clans!! You wouldnt find this in cities would you !! Visit villages in eastern Assam in dhemaji. Homogenie ( talk) 23:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tripura Buranji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
TrangaBellam ( talk) 19:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tripura Buranji. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TrangaBellam ( talk) 13:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
Back in 2012, you added a short cite to "Baruah 1983" but no such source is listed in the bibliography. Is that a typo in year? Can you please add?
Additionally, Ahomisation is missing full citations for Boruah 2007, Gait 1887, and Phukan 2010. I did not check who added them, but would you be able to track them down?
Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]]
to
your common.js page. Thanks,
Renata (
talk) 03:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Chaipau. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bijni Kingdom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 04:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Koch is not a Indo aryan tribe. The language clearly falls under Tibeto burman language. I provided source for it . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homogenie ( talk • contribs) 15:29, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. UserNumber ( talk) 17:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RFC Statement. Thank you. TrangaBellam ( talk) 22:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. TrangaBellam ( talk) 06:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Chaipau. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Migrations to Assam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 11:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics in the past year that there is a new request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics § RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?. Nardog ( talk) 10:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Peopling of Assam section is filled with lots of speculations and some unprovable claims. Shouldn't we write about peoples of assam in 1st century ? It's historically correct. Kirata isn't only IA term in the page like Brahmans, Aryan etc are also IA terms. KPAhmed ( talk) 20:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Chaipu, but what is the source for Gait 1887 and Phukan 2010 on Ahomisation? Dangling refs are showing up on Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. - Aussie Article Writer ( talk) 18:50, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Kautilya3 ( talk) 03:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on McMahon Line. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 ( talk) 16:45, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Please check the wiki page for maharani Gayatri Devi, it is already mentioned there that she is from a koch-rajbongshi family. So inclusion of these notable people should not be removed. Some random guy edited the page and removed this info and now everyone is after removing already verified inclusion. Please edit with an neutral point of view. Robo Zay ( talk) 10:48, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Please continue discussion here: Talk:Rajbanshi_people#Notable_people. Chaipau ( talk) 13:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Chaipau. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bijni Raj Estate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 16:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Read J B Bhattacharjee s pre colonial political structures of Barak valley to know about pre colonial Bengalis of Barak valley. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 07:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Only Karimganj is from the Sylhet region, not the rest of "Barak valley". The history the non-Karimganj region is well known and mentioned in the article: Tripura kingdom → Khaspur of the Dehans → Kachari kingdom. If you want to document the settlement of people from Sylhet by these powers, please do so, but use WP:RS.
But if some people from Barak valley worship Kechaikhati from Sadiya, it might mean they, or at least some of them, are from Brahmaputra valley not Sylhet—even if they speak Sylheti language. The term "Sodial" could be derived from Sadiya.
Also, the people who were settled by the Kachari kings will likely retain the landed titles from the Kachari king, not the landed titles from Sylhet. It is only those who immigrated on their own will retain their landed titles from Sylhet. Chaipau ( talk) 09:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
The Bengali people of Barak valley adopted the worship of Kachakanti Devi from Barman Kacharis.The Barman Kacharis are related to Dimasa Kacharis,Bodo Kacharis,Chutiyas and Deoris etc. Moreover the Mirashdari system was modeled after the revenue system of Bengal. Sodial is generally used by Bengali Muslims of Cachar - Hailakandi region. You can search for people with the surname Sodial on Facebook. Plus Dimasa Kachari Kingdom and Ahom Kingdom were rivals. Why are you so reluctant to accept that there were Bengali people in Cachar-Hailakandi region in the pre independence period? The presence of Bengali people in Barak valley is well documented. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
I know that Barak valley was ruled by Tripura Kingdom then Koch Rajbongshi dynasty of Khaspur and then Dimasa Kachari kingdom. It is possible for cultures to be influenced by one another. Just like the Bengali (Sylheti) culture of Cachar- Hailakandi region was influenced by Dimasa Kachari / Barman Kachari Culture. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
The Brahmin priests of Kachakanti temple in Udharbond are Bengali Brahmins whose ancestors came from Sylhet during the Dimasa Kachari period. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
By the 1700's century, the Dimasa Kachari rule extended into the plains of Cachar. The plains people did not participate in the courts of the Dimasa Kachari king directly. They were organized according to khels, and the king provided justice and collected revenue via an official called the Uzir. Though the plains people did not participate in the Dimasa Kachari royal court, the Dharmadhi guru and other Brahmins in the court cast a considerable influence, especially with the beginning of the 18th century. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
The Khels were organise on the basis of Caste and religion. The khel was headed by a Choudhary under whom there were Barbhuiyas Followed by Mazarbhuiyas, Barlaskars and Laskars. The Uzirs or Mazumdars were incharge of revenue collection. The Deshmukhyas were land surveyors. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
The Patras and Bhandaris ( Ministers) led by BaraBhandari ( Prime Minister) we're exclusively Dimasa Kachari and in rare cases Koch Rajbongshi. Truthfulsoldier ( talk) 10:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
@ Truthfulsoldier: please follow up here: Talk:Barak_Valley#Immigration/Refugee. Chaipau ( talk) 14:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
I have recently made a draft about ahom war against kachari and Jaintia kingdom. /info/en/?search=Draft:Ahom_expedition_of_Jaintia_and_Kachari_Kingdoms.... I need some help and more references and sources .. If you can edit and add some more sources it will really help. Can you please suggest me some books's about Ahom history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonardondishant ( talk • contribs) 09:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Sir, I have seen your work in editing Ahom related pages on Wikipedia. You're doing a good job. Can you write about 'Rajkonwar' surname? Because people with Rajkonwar surname are actually direct descendants of the first Ahom King Chaloung Sukapha, and are Prince of the erstwhile Ahom Kingdom. So there must be a page or atleast a category on them. AccurateInformation2004 ( talk) 14:55, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Faster than Thunder. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dimasa Kingdom without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You removed 1,594 bytes to be exact. Faster than Thunder ( talk | contributions | block) 15:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello sir! Please help urgently, someone has been vandalizing the wiki page for Ahom kingdom.... Please take strict action as soon as possible . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonardondishant ( talk • contribs) 06:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the puppy. Kitteh for you . Good Night.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 20:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Excuse me, You've reverted my edit. But that's just one view. There are other views too and that source itself is just claiming someone else's claim. It would look better without such claims. Northeast heritage ( talk) 11:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
There are other views too. Also the Manikpha name is taken from Kachari Buranji which isn't reliable source. Northeast heritage ( talk) 15:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bodo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boro language.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey there, some has distroted the facts of the the Battle of Alaboi , I request you to restore the page as soon as possible. Vishwanath2008 ( talk) 06:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
The numbers which are shown are not correct also just add the numbers who actually fought in the battle not the total force Jonardondishant ( talk) 10:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi . You
added a quote to
Ahom kingdom with the reference Baruah 1983
. However there is no 1983 work by Baruah in the article, did you mean 1986's A Comprehensive History of Assam or 1993's Last Days of Ahom Monarchy? Both of these are already defined in the references section. Could you let me know which work you meant, and I'll coorect the error? -- LCU
ActivelyDisinterested ∆
transmissions∆ °
co-ords° 15:19, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
You have added that, persecution of Shudra mahanta's started from the reign of Siva Singha and Tungkhungia kings, which is completely false and subjective. Since Pratap Singha their disciples and the Shudra Mahantas were persecuted. One eg of it is- 'Jayaditya Singha had executed the Mayamara Mahanta by an executioner, and threwed his body in the river. However, his body was rescued by a old women whom she gave to their disciples'. Please refer to- Last days of Ahom Monarchy and Matak and their kingdom.
Also execlusively by Shudra Mahanta they mean the Mayamara Mahanta, other shudra Mahanta had received patronage from the kings and the nobles like of 'Dihing'. Vishwanath2008 ( talk) 14:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
I am not being apologist to the tungkhungia's, nor I am justifying the sevre and tyrannical actions taken against rebels. I have not even edited the text of that. The seeds of the downfall was long sown by the preceding kings (before Siva Singha), and the seeds grew to give fruits during Lakshmi Singha reign, which he couldn't control in anyway being, because of those same old massacaring, which made the people more upset. Also nor could any aristocrat thought image of this, because anytime in past they had taken them out of troubles by any means.
Leaving all aside my main topic was about under whoes reign the shudras were first persecuted, you have wrote in a way by which it seems that all the Shudra Mahanta persecuting thing only started from the reign of Siva Singha.
Vishwanath2008 ( talk) 15:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Phuleswari insult to Mayamata Mahanta lightly might have affected the new Mahanta Astabhuj. Astabhuj referred the Ahom raja as his father till very late. And the first rebellion was organised by the disciples of the Mayamara Satra, not some other Satra, however later on point it inspired many oppressed subjects to take arms against the government. Vishwanath2008 ( talk) 16:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Will appreciate you keeping a tab. Best, TrangaBellam ( talk) 16:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Chaipau! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Hinduism several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Hinduism, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 ( talk) 17:58, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
You always revert edits!! And add low quality bad photos. Orang srang17 ( talk) 14:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Very fascinating guy. Was quite perplexed about whether his own documentary supported Love Jihad or not :3 TrangaBellam ( talk) 15:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Phongsawadan Tai-Ahom: Ahorn Buranji [Tai-Ahom Chronicles], 2 Vols. Transcribed and translated by RENU WICHASIN. Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing Ltd. Pp. xxiv, 993 [Continuous Pagination]. Map, Photos, Tables, Glossary. [In Thai]
Reviewed over here. Do you have a copy? TrangaBellam ( talk) 07:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
The section Violence_against_Muslims_in_India#1983_Nellie_massacre reads completely different to the Nellie massacre page. Hope you can do something about it. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 18:08, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Please read Northeast heritage ( talk) 12:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Constitutional order is primary source and simply gives list. It doesn't say anything about actual ethnic group. So there must be secondary source to claim - Boros are listed as ... Also these are not give under quotation mark so it is misleading because nobody uses "Boro, Borokachari". Northeast heritage ( talk) 06:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
MBlaze Lightning ( talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
MBlaze Lightning ( talk) 09:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
You had added an argument of Bareh's claim in some articles.
"Other scholars have pointed out that other river names such as Dibang, Dihang, Doyang and the like were mixture of Bodo di and -ong (Austric) which means water." (Bareh 1987:269–270)
Austric is proposed language family encompassing Austronesian and Austroasiatic languages. Neither "ong" means "water" in Khasi languages nor "ong" is Proto-Austroasiatic construction. Is it not a fringe theory? Does his claim belong to Wikipedia because he doesn't seem to refer any expert scholar? Northeast heritage ( talk) 13:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Please have a look at this change as well as the discussion about this in the talk page. Such identifiers are unnecessary. - 117.201.119.23 ( talk) 18:02, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, If the Author, J N Sarkar, of some chapters of "The Comprehensive History of Assam" is the same person as Jadunath Sarkar who died in 1958, Could you please tell me his original articles regarding those chapters? Actually, I don't have the book. Northeast heritage ( talk) 06:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Reading his thesis makes me feel like I am reading your arguments on Boro identity formation. http://gyan.iitg.ernet.in/handle/123456789/2261?show=full Northeast heritage ( talk) 16:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Do you have any solid evidence regarding this ? If you don't have any evidence for you claim, Please avoid nurturing prejudice. Northeast heritage ( talk) 19:07, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Tribe-by-tribe depictions of the North-East undoubtedly stem from a nineteenth century European vision of human diversity which in many aspects converged with local representations. In this respect, colonial censuses have greatly contributed to the freezing of categories although its precise role in ethnogenesis has recently come under debate.
p1.Colonial knowledge production and classificatory practices assigned a place for the Boros within a racialised hierarchy.
Prior to the coming of the British and being subjected to their ethnological inquiries and census enumerations, Boros were, what could be termed as a 'fuzzy' but 'practically precise' community sharing kinship ties in the Northeastern region of the Indian sub-continent.
You asked me to search for Kamaika (phonetically Khamaikha) in a PhD thesis which is all about Bathouist version of Bathouism. There is no mention of a single Hindu deity. Also it is folkloristic study, foklores are continuously being made and remande. There is be no mention of Khamaikha (Kamakhya) because She is now part of Hinduism. I wasted my time searching for Her in PhD thesis.
I consulted a Boro researcher. He told that Endle and Hodgson mention about Ai-deo / Ai and C A Soppit in his book "An Historical and Descriptive Account of the Kachari Tribes in the North Cachar Hills: With Specimens of Tales and Folk-lore" mentions bato , Kamaika etc when he compares Boro pantheon with Dimasa pantheon. I varified Endle and Hodgson but I could not read C A Soppitt's book. Also
Hodgson confirms that Ai means Kamakhya
Northeast heritage (
talk) 17:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For obvious reasons . Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 09:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC) |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
Hi, it is regarding these additions. Do you think adding an unreferenced section tag would be a good idea? - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 20:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks again. This user with their 'canned summaries' again. While POV is there, in this case it looks like they tried replicating the source quote, though the flow of the sentence is a bit off IMO. What do you think? - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 19:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Please go through my edit summaries, I removed unsourced informations. Kindly assume good faith. Eduardo2024 ( talk) 14:01, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to
note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.
Hello,
You are invited to participate in a dispute resolution regarding contents of 2023 Manipur violence.
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#2023 Manipur violence Tms369 ( talk) 05:13, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Regarding this edit. Shouldn't we stick to the sources or are we suppose to be more precise as in the change. I mean it is entirely possible that other branches of AA or TB, like some form of Mundari or a non-Bodo-Kachari language may have been spoken in ancient Kamarupa. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 16:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi Chaipau, I will be mostly offline for about a week starting today. I hope you can take care of all the discussions where we are both involved. If agreements cannot be reached, please feel free to start RfCs. Thanks. -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 12:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
|
|
Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.
Some heavy reading here. [19] :-) -- Kautilya3 ( talk) 08:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
@ Chaipau, hello, I am here to discuss regarding the historicity of Bagh Hazarika's wikipedia page. The whole page is devoid of any reliable sources, it's completely made of pov led e-articles which proves nothing about his originality or historicity of his character.
Please if you get some time to spare, read this thesis, Ch 8, page 299 to 301. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/66700 Ch ComparingQuantities ( talk) 07:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
Please have a look at these changes. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 10:27, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
In Ahom history, It is said that Borahis were completely absorbed into Ahom fold. Could you tell me which Assamese Buranjis mention that event? Northeast heritage ( talk) 17:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)