![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Category:Asteroids named as an award, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Category:Oklahoma Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 02:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
The Evita award list is newly created and nominated for Featured list status. Please feel free to comment. — IB [ Poke ] 12:19, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Many participants here create a lot of content, have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are just some of the skills considered at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.
So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:
You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
There is this discussion Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Beauty_Pageants#RFC_on_creation_of_consensus_standard related to beauty pageant winners that might be relavant to people in this project. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 06:35, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi I am very new to this, somewhat scary, but on the Wildlife Photographer of the Year wikipedia page I noticed the detail results only go to 1991, being a contestant in this competition, I have the printed portfolios for 1989 & 1990, which I can copy and send to anyone interested in entering this Data in and updating, or if given a template to fill out can enter the data and provide copies of the portfolio as well to be checked off for someone to upload. DarrylT ( talk) 23:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Dear fellow Wikipedians, In this edit a user has proposed to add three awards to an article about the Gokhale Method. Two of these awards have their own articles on this WikiProject: Nautilus Book Awards and Independent Publisher Book Awards. However, since both articles have not been assessed yet, and little secondary sources have been provided in it, I was wondering whether the awards are notable enough to include in the article about the Gokhale Method. Comments are welcome.-- Farang Rak Tham ( talk) 23:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)-- Farang Rak Tham ( talk) 00:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
I'm of the opinion it's sometimes better to keep the article as a platform to highlight the award's true nature, which does more good than keeping it in the dark through deletion.
I have started a discussion to split the article National Film Award – Special Jury Award / Special Mention (Feature Film). I hope WPAW members would spare some time to join the discussion. Regards. -- Let There Be Sunshine ( talk) 09:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( non-admin closure) James ( talk/ contribs) 23:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | It was proposed in this section that
Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards/Archive 3 be
renamed and moved to
Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards.
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links:
current log •
target log |
Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes → Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards – "Prizes" is already implicated, as is a hugh amount of other stuff than cannot be bothered to be included in the title. Considering simplicity seems at hand. Please compare Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 01:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.
A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Awards_and_prizes
Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.— Rod talk 13:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello WikiProject Awards,
Unregistered editors cannot create articles on Wikipedia, but they can use the articles for creation process to submit drafts that registered editors can either accept and publish or decline. WikiProject Articles for creation is looking for experienced editors who want to partake in this peer review process. If you have what it takes to get involved, then please take a look at the reviewing instructions. To discuss specific AfC reviews, do so freely on the designated talk page.
There is currently a backlog of over 2800 drafts (0 very old).
If you know an editor who may be willing to help out, please use the template you are currently reading {{subst:
WPAFCInvite}}
to draw attention to this WikiProject. Many hands make light work!
Editors willing to review a variety of drafts are especially welcome. If you're interested only in reviewing certain topics, that still helps. At least 12 pending drafts relate to awards (are in the intersection of Category:Pending AfC submissions and Category:Draft-Class awards articles). Over 2000 pending drafts have not yet had a WikiProject added, so more may be in the scope of this WikiProject. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 01:21, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
This is still a half baked idea so I am throwing this into this arena to see if there is enough heat to finnish off the baking. WP has been going long enough now, that we have had a number of very valued editors pass away. For current editors we can award a WP t-shirt. How can we acknowledge the sterling work of those who are no longer with us ? My thinking is that in this age of computerized aided deign and manufacture we could inexpensively generate plaques in a similar vein to Blue plaques. Blue plaques normally are affixed to the wall of the nominees home – in the sprit of WP however, I think they ought to be (on first option) be displayed on their collage walls. WP has long shaken off the mantel of amateurism and these plaques may encourage newbie academics to view WP as something worth spending time on (so this is a plus plus). Sure, there are many passed editors that came from a non-academic background – but they went to school too didn't they. Let the plaques go up there. English heritage who authorize and erect Blue Plaques in the UK require at least 20 years must have passed since a candidate’s death. Think 2 years for our purposes would suffice as it gives enough time for reflection. I.E., these awards should be reserved for the truly worthy who have made significant contributions. Aspro ( talk) 17:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
If I make an award article, is it a good idea to include a list of recipients for each category? And if it's yes, should the article be included in the list project and have a list category added? ★Trekker ( talk) 18:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Even if they are, the articles need cleanup. From what I can tell from auto-translations of the sources, the "awards" are heavily promoted, but the only notability I can see is simply that they they are heavily promoted. I am not seeing significant editing from anything but WP:SPA accounts (apologies if I overlooked someone). -- Ronz ( talk) 16:49, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
While translating 44th Annie Awards in French, I've noticed discrepancies between the entries listed in the article and the list of nominees in additional sources. After a quick check of the official source, I've established these entries (about SpongeBob SquarePants and Sesame Street) are fake and immediately removed them.
I'm concerned, though. Who did this? Are there more fakes like this? Is it part of a wider marketing campaign or "test" of Wikipedia? I'm not used to Wikipedia in English and need to opinion about it. J. N. Squire ( talk) 20:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Should the template name be {{WikiProject Awards|class=stub|importance=low}} or maybe {{WikiProject Awards and prizes|class=stub|importance=low}}/nowiki> or maybe <nowiki>{{WikiProject Awards and Prizes|class=stub|importance=low}} or maybe something else? All of those template examples result in the proper categories of Stub-Class awards articles and Low-importance awards articles, but the talk page has the project name in green, showing a redirect.
I would standardize on one name which is not a redirect, but I don't know which one produces the right result.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 00:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
There's a deletion discussion within this WikiProject's scope going on at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foresight Institute Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology. The main area of contention is whether there are sufficient independent secondary sources for the award. Feedback would be appreciated. Antony–22 ( talk⁄ contribs) 10:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Editor input is requested at this thread Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Meryl Streep#Awards descriptions. MarnetteD| Talk 18:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Should Template:WikiProject Awards and prizes be moved to Template:WikiProject Awards, and should the message be included to remove "prizes" from the title of the project? --- Another Believer ( Talk) 20:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:Audie_Award_Winners
Hi. I created the above list article and submitted it for review. It lists the categories and winners for the Audie Awards that is an article that belongs to this group. Thanks! SJTatsu ( talk) 16:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
There's an RfC going on at Talk:Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology#RfC on list format on whether lists of awardees should be in a table or bulleted list format, and whether they should contain photographs and other supplementary columns. Feedback would be appreciated! Antony–22 ( talk⁄ contribs) 04:23, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
There seems to be a strong push to ban these kinds of articles from using tables or including photographs. Feedback on this proposal would be appreciated. Antony–22 ( talk⁄ contribs) 04:46, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Are Forbes lists (such as top 100 most influential celebrities etc. ) and lists of similar standing to be included on Lists of awards and nominations received by individuals? If so, are they to be included in any awards count? Such as taking #1 to mean a win? Couldn't find anything about this in archives of this page NicklausAU 07:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Editors in this WikiProject may be interested in the featured quality source review RFC that has been ongoing. It would change the featured article candidate process (FAC) so that source reviews would need to occur prior to any other reviews for FAC. Your comments are appreciated. -- Izno Repeat ( talk) 21:46, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Hoping this is an appropriate place to reach out, I'd like to request a peer review and/or advice on ways to improve the 2018 Nobel Peace Prize article. The article's quality rating is "stub," and, after seeing an example on this Project's article page, I changed the article's importance rating from "high" to "top". Since I'm not sure what's generally well known about the award and the 2018 laureates, I've erred on the side of caution by sourcing most statements and (perhaps too heavily) quoting sources. Any tips and advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! Litjade ( talk) 11:11, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Notability (awards).
DBig
Xrayᗙ
21:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi there! I would like to request a peer review and edit the following information for the Shaw Prize article:
1. As at today, 12 of the Nobel laureates – Jules Hoffmann, Bruce Beutler, Saul Perlmutter, Adam Riess, Shinya Yamanka, Robert Lefkowitz and Brian Schmidt, Jeffrey C Hall, Michael Rosbash, Michael W Young, Kip S Thourne, Rainer Weiss – were previous laureates of the Shaw Prize.
2. Board of Adjudicators: Frank H Shu (Chairman), Kenneth Young, Reinhard Genzel, Randy W Schekman, Timothy Gowers
3. Selection Committees 2018-2019:
Astronomy – Reinhard Genzel (Chairman), Chryssa Kouveliotou, John A Peacock, Scott Tremaine, Ewine Van Dishoeck
Life Science and Medicine – Randy W Schekman (Chairman), Bonnie L Bassler, Hans Clevers, Carol Greider, Richard Lifton, Xiaodong Wang, Huda Zoghbi
Mathematical Sciences – Timothy Gowers (Chairman), Hélène Esnault, Felix Otto, Paul Seidel, Wendelin Werner
Pn0824 (
talk)
03:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this RfC is to discuss which categories of an adult award are notable. As it is known, adult awards have more than a hundred categories and consequently by WP:INHERIT not all are notable. [1]
Which articles should be created? Which should be excluded? Which categories are encyclopedic and which ones fall into WP:NOT and should be taken from articles? There is a Gender bias on Wikipedia, since there are AVN articles of Best Actress, Best Supporting Actress, Actress Female Performer of the Year, but there are none about actors, directors or films? Guilherme Burn ( talk) 15:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude ( talk) 06:48, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
I am proposing an improvement project for some improvement on articles pertaining to Star Awards for all articles, especially the pre-2005 articles, which I have not yet done so. It is basically changing from a list-form to the one seen similar to award-ceremonies (like the one in post-2005). I also got information for presenters and some resources from the Chinese version of Star Awards. The reason is because that not only the article is not only to improve the consistency of works, but also to fix proofing, and removing unnecessary red links that are still exist in these articles.
I had tried to seek help on manpower for the article like asking Unknown152438 and LMX97 but they were busy. I too, might be busy, but i took the chance to request a proposal to help out on improving the award articles, similar to the one seen in the Primetime Emmy Awards and Academy Awards.
I would also wish to do the same for Grammy Awards since they use a list-form instead of award-ceremony form. Would you initiate the improvement project?
Yours regards, ( Sculture65 ( talk) 10:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC))
P.S., this year marks the 25th (silver) anniversary of Star Awards, it would be so nice to improve the article with a fashion.
Discussion and survey at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Korea/Popular_culture#Are_music_show_wins_notable? AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 23:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Academy Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Academy Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America 1000 09:41, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Does anyone know of a good source for the Canadian television Gemini Awards, which have been supplanted by the Canadian Screen Awards? I spent a bit of time working on a big table and then found out my source is no good. I haven't been able to find anything at the official site academy.ca/awards but maybe I'm not looking hard enough. – Reidgreg ( talk) 20:12, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Should there be a category for recipients of this award? If so, please would someone create it and add John Gilhooly. Thanks. Pam D 07:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
I have proposed renaming of the last four "Awards and prizes" categories; please see WP:CFDS within the next 48 hours. – Fayenatic London 09:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
I have nominated List of Scripps National Spelling Bee champions for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 11:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
/info/en/?search=World_Food_Prize#Laureates
Information to be added or removed: Change "Founder and leader of East-West Seed..." to "Founder and honorary chairman of East-West Seed..." Explanation of issue: Mr Groot's current title is Honorary Chairman of East-West Seed. His son, Ard Groot, is Chairman and Bert van der Feltz is the company's President & CEO. References supporting change: [1] [2] BrenRoa ( talk) 04:40, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
References
{{Connected contributor|User1=BrenRoa |U1-declared=yes| U1-otherlinks=(Optional) I am an employee of the company associated with the edit I am requesting.}}
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma ( talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
It is important to note that the fee for entering the competition is a whopping 122 euros (artists over 25 yrs old), and 97,6 euros (25 and under). They actually use the term "free theme" for submissions, ignoring the tremendous wealth gap this represents for a vast majority of artists. This is part of a mega cottage industry financed on the backs of struggling artists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reroot ( talk • contribs) 00:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Okay, so through various different pages and editing I've come across a question/issue with {{ Infobox awards list}} and {{ Infobox musician awards}}. Specifically, that there is no "pending" in either template, causing some editors to stick the whole damn template into the article space ( example 2). There is also some discrepancy (mentioned but not dealt with here) about counting nominations even if they turned into wins, so I have two questions:
In other words, I'm mostly looking for a little more consistency between all of the various articles that use (or subst'ed) the awards templates. Primefac ( talk) 22:50, 12 August 2019 (UTC) (please do not ping on reply)
Greetings! I have recently relisted a requested move discussion at Talk:Writers Guild of America Awards 2019#Requested move 23 January 2020, regarding a page relating to this WikiProject. Discussion and opinions are invited. Thanks, Wikipedical ( talk) 20:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Editors of this project may be interested in a discussion at Template talk:Infobox awards list, concerning the content of the template's footnote. – Tera tix ₵ 09:46, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
I have nominated Tony Award for Best Featured Actor in a Play for demotion at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Tony Award for Best Featured Actor in a Play/archive1. This notice serves as service of such. Therapyisgood ( talk) 08:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Formal notice that Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Play is up for demotion at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Play/archive1. Therapyisgood ( talk) 09:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
As an interested party, I am providing notice to this WikiProject about a new Request for Proposal that is proposing an exception to the guideline WP:OCAWARD in the policy Overcategorization. The Rfc will be here when the system gets around to adding it: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines. And also in the proposals Rfc. However, it is ready for comment directly in the guideline talk page: Wikipedia talk:Overcategorization#RfC on exceptions to WP:OCAWARD. Your insights would be appreciated. Thank you. dawnleelynn (talk) 20:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
We have now the possibility to easier link Nobelprize.org using a template and Wikidata. For background and implementation see Version 1 is now implemented for creating links in Wikipedia using Nobel Laureate API ID (P8024) and please help push this message out to Wikipedia languages that can benefit from using it and let me know if you need help with creating new Templates - Salgo60 ( talk) 22:29, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
There doesn't seem to be an agreed "best practice" for lists of winners of awards which have shortlists - interested parties might like to join the discussion at Talk:Wainwright Prize. Pam D 12:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
I just came across this study [1] that analyzes Nobel laureates from various perspectives over time, e.g. in terms of their geographic and institutional as well as collaboration/ training patterns. It also has some useful figures, particularly in the supplement, though some of these have been subject to a correction. [2] -- Daniel Mietchen ( talk) 23:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
References
Category:XBIZ Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Right cite ( talk) 17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:AVN Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Right cite ( talk) 17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Template talk:Infobox award § Using image for current award rather than text. {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk
18:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Is this assessment legitimate? I don't think Wikipedia barnstars are in your scope. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 20:30, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
This list was previously totally unsourced save for two refs in the lead. I have since sourced the entire table and expanded the lead somewhat. I would like to possibly nominate it for featured list status one day but until then I was hoping someone could take a look and see if there are any further improvements to be made that I have missed. Here doesn't seem to be very active but I don't know where else would be equally appropriate to ask. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 23:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Browsing the list of Top-importance awards Category:Top-importance awards articles there seem to be some very strange entries.
The most egregious is the large set of US-state level Emmy awards. This is probably not so much the result of systemic bias, more the unnoticed behaviour of a single editor ten years ago who has not been corrected since. The criterion at WP:WPAW#Rating articles is that "Top" should go to awards which are "familiar worldwide", with the excellent example of the Nobel prizes. So I'm asking now if there is any reason why this set of US-state level Emmys should not be immediately re-graded?
More broadly, I find some awards which are significant in my country in their field and are known to some extent internationally are listed as Low. In general, articles about non-USA awards are one, two, or three levels importance levels lower than their USA equivalents, lower if the country is not English-speaking. For example, all the Theatre award articles, such as Molière Award contain a sentence such as "The Molière Awards are considered the highest French theatre honour, the equivalent to the American Tony Award, the British Olivier Award and the Spanish Premios Max." Yet the importance ratings are currently Tony:Top, Olivier:High, Moliere:Mid. (Max is not yet rated.) This is just one example, but it does have the appearance of systemic bias. -- Monxton ( talk) 18:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
WikiProject Awards|importance= |class=}}
. Whereas what you actually inserted was {{
WikiProject Awards|importance=Top |class=Start}}
. By doing so you assessed your own page. You have been shown the evidence, please stop denying it. --
Monxton (
talk)
05:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
We could do with some expert opinion at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2021 January 1#Red_pin_badge_on_lapel_of_conductor_Riccardo_Muti_in_2021_Wiener_Philharmoniker_New_Year's_day_concert; any assistance will be most gratefully received. Alansplodge ( talk) 16:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
I've asked here if the James Beard Foundation Award should be split. Feedback welcome! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 03:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Could someone from this WikiProject take a look at AMAA Who's Who in the Martial Arts Hall of Fame and assess it? It appears to have been created directly in the mainspace. Since it didn’t go through WP:AFC and didn’t have a talk page until to today, it never seems to have been assessed. There’s no article about the American Martial Arts Alliance itself, it’s a bit odd that there would an article one of its awards ceremonies or its HOF. — Marchjuly ( talk) 22:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Does anyone else think the number of navboxes being created for winners of various American Music Award is leaning towards overkill? See Category:American Music Award templates. Are they needed at all? Are they needed for every award category? A CfD for a similar Grammy Award navboxes occurred in 2014 with a consensus to delete all but the major award categories (although some from that group have since been recreated). It just seems like something that can quickly lead to template bloat.
Personally, I would limit such navboxes for US awards to the four majors (EGOT). I mean, the number of navboxes in some actor articles is a joke ( Cate Blanchett has over 40). It seems like there's one for every city's film critics association, such as those in Category:Houston Film Critics Society Awards templates and Category:San Diego Film Critics Society Awards templates. Now I'm going off on a tangent, but perhaps these types of template creations should be reeled in a bit. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 05:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I've asked here if editors could review the appropriateness of including additional recognition to the article for film producer and philanthropist Jeff Skoll. I welcome feedback. I have a conflict of interest because I work with the Jeff Skoll Group. I am careful to build consensus in place of directly editing the article. Thank you. JSG Lindsey ( talk) 17:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I have created a new delsort category dedicated to awards, Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Awards ( WP:DELSORT/AWARDS). Surprised this didn't already exist. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 01:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Is there some rule in an award guideline that says what order a list of awards should be in? Most lists are done chronologically, earliest year first, and many of the list of awards of so-and-so are listed by award name. It looks a little funny not to be sorted by year. I know it can be changed on a desktop by clicking the column header but it would seem to me the first instance that hits you in the face should go year by year. I am having this discussion at Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Elliot Page. To be honest, as a reader I would like to see it ordered by year and within the year ordered alphabetical by nominated work. Then if a reader wants to see it by award they can alter the column. Right now it seems backwards. Is there an award guideline that mandates what way we do it? Fyunck(click) ( talk) 19:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, my name is Mira and I am the employee representative for Sherwin-Williams here on Wikipedia. I posted a recent request on the Sherwin-Williams talk page to collaborate with editors on improvements to the current article's Awards and recognition section, while following the site's guidelines for editors like me with a conflict of interest. As an employee, I will refrain from editing the article and related articles directly. Generally, I'm proposing that the section include a list of major awards and rankings the company has received from Forbes in recent years. The request came on the heels of a recent update to the section where a helpful editor removed some poorly sourced content identified through Talk page discussions. The same editor has weighed in to say they do not think the list of Forbes awards is worthy of inclusion. I'm posting here to gather thoughts from others about what kinds of recognition are acceptable and will, of course, defer to the community's consensus. Below is the list of Forbes awards I'm proposing for inclusion in the live article. My full request and related discussion can be viewed at the Sherwin-Williams Talk page.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts or guidance editors here may have to offer. MiraSherwin-Williams ( talk) 23:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Any way the project can limit the amount of over links /template spam.
Moxy-
02:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Looking for helpful input in regards to the 'producer' parameter for Template:Infobox award. Any help/input would be greatly appreciated. Magitroopa ( talk) 06:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
While stub-sorting Anna Czóbel I corrected the spelling of the red link Meritorius Artist of Hungary to Meritorious Artist of Hungary but it is still a red link. I see there are two categories: Category:Merited artists of the Republic of Hungary and Category:Artists of Merit of the Hungarian People's Republic: are these identical? If so, they need to be combined. If not, could someone annotate the categories to make it clear which of them, if either, relates to "Meritorious Artist..."? I've tried to look at the Hungarian language wikipedia but just got more confused. I've made a similar post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hungary. Pam D 19:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I am a German wiki editor and last month I wrote a comprehensive update of the German article " Europäischer Baum des Jahres". In Wikimedia Commons now has a lot of freely available images related to the trees under the category European Tree of the Year. Today, the live award ceremony can be seen under this Channel. I propose an update of the English-language page and would be happy if someone could contribute.-- Cookroach ( talk) 10:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Feel free to contribute to the discussion about adding automatic short descriptions to {{ Infobox award}} at Template talk:Infobox award#Automatic short description. -- Trialpears ( talk) 17:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
I created Africa Food Prize, feel free to improve. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 11:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Greta Thunberg § proposal to split section for honors.
Sean Stephens (
talk)
11:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prix Versailles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prix Versailles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. I am posting here in the hope that page watchers will be able to provide evidence on whether the award is notable or not. TSventon ( talk) 22:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Wikidata provides information on awards but if you want to learn about laureates, you need to write SPARQL queries (and this is often difficult).
I've designed a wikidata template ( d:Template:TP award) which provides useful queries for templates. It can be easily added to talk pages in Wikidata using d:Template:Item documentation (just add {{Item documentation}}). See example d:Talk:Q1624297.
I think that it could be useful to complete Wikipedia articles about awards.
Tell me if you find it useful and feel free to give me feedback. PAC2 ( talk) 07:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Next Manga Award#Requested move 9 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 05:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Eisner Award#Requested move 17 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 11:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
I have nominated List of Nobel laureates affiliated with Princeton University for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. TompaDompa ( talk) 01:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
There is a split propasal pertaining to WP:Barnstars. The proposal can be found here, thank you. Jerm ( talk) 20:56, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Template talk:Table cell templates § Color change in "Nominated".
RunningTiger123 (
talk)
03:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Per several featured lists promoted within the last few years, including this, this, this and this, there are many instances where shared nominees are listed in the category column. However, on Park Min-young, user @ Paper9oll does not think this logical. I, on the other hand, believe that it is 100% fine when formatting it in that way and it makes sorting much cleaner, where it makes all categories for a single work sorted together instead of disjointed in the table. Are any inputs available for either formats? ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 06:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
If I may, in music, an artist/their song/album/music video can be nominated, so a column showing the various names/titles nom'd is necessary. With actors, generally speaking, it's mostly themselves that are nom'd and no one/nothing else (though shared noms obv occur), so I guess rather than having a col spanning 30 or 40 rows to indicate "Herself" or "Himself" (as we see on solo artist award pages), it's excluded altogether. While I understand the possible reasoning behind it, I think shared noms (on the above and for PMY) and any add. cmmts in the Cat. col should be cited as a footnote (as appears to have been done for some of the earlier entries in Theron's table), rather than stated next to the cat. title in brackets. The column still is "Category" after all, and an actor is a nominee, not a category. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 04:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:AwardsInCenturyHeader has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
AdrianHObradors (
talk)
19:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
)and turns it into something like
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{ cite web}}, {{ cite journal}} and {{ doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
I have opened a discussion here, about possibly standardising if production Peabody Awards are listed for individuals named in the citation, which may also concern this project. Kingsif ( talk) 11:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates § Pulitzer Prizes. Flagging for this project because if the nomination succeeds, it may set a precedent for
WP:ITNR to post the Pulitzers each year. {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk
18:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Vodafone Ghana Music Awards#Requested move 4 May 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 16:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Requesting input at an RFC concerning who awards medals page. GoodDay ( talk) 18:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
There is a proposal about the scope and potential renaming of this article, for which other editors' input is welcome. MartinPoulter ( talk) 15:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Please see discussion at User talk:Carlobunnie#Winners ref, and edit summaries of List of awards and nominations received by Sandra Bullock, Yet to Come (The Most Beautiful Moment), and List of awards and nominations received by BTS
Should nominations have a ref that only includes nominations, or a ref that includes both nominations and winners. Thanks, Indagate ( talk) Indagate ( talk) 19:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Awards and accessibility under Vector 2022, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This discussion is probably more directly relevant to this WikiProject, but since this talk page gets minimal responses and I noticed the issues on film lists first, I placed the discussion there. Thank you.
RunningTiger123 (
talk)
19:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Is there a standard style for writing an award title in prose? Does it need punctuation? e.g. which of the following (if any) are correct?
Thanks. -- Jameboy ( talk) 17:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated BBC Young Sports Personality of the Year for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 16:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
I can't find the London Gazette listing for Gloria Cameron (aka Florence Cameron): see https://newspaperarchive.com/other-articles-clipping-jan-03-1980-3729948/. She is listed OK in The Times, but the civilian MBEs don't seem to be in the issue of London Gazette which is linked from the article. Any ideas? Pam D 19:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at
Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent
Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to {{
WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{ WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{
WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present.
Aymatth2 (
talk)
14:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Orders, Decorations, and Medals/Archive 7#Deprecated language in citations for UK honours about whether citations should be updated to today's language, eg changing the 1980 "For service to the disabled." to "For service to disabled people." Members of this Wikiproject may have a view: please comment there. Pam D 17:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
In the above section on the Charlie Puth BLP, user Efernandez18 created an awards show entry called iHeartRadio Titanium Awards, for two radio spins awards Puth apparently received from IHR, in February. However this is not an actual ceremony or award show of any kind. From google searching, the Titanium Award was presented at the 2018 iHRMAs for the first time (per an iHeart press rel) and subsequent recipients were awarded throughout each year by IH, not at the actual IHRAs. I adjusted the additions with appropriate sourcing for both entries, but Efernandez18 changed it again a week later to what is presently seen in the table. He does not seem to care that it not an actual award show/ceremony or that one of the entries remains unsourced. Can anyone advise the best way to handle this? -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 18:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi - I am drafting an article on the New Zealand animation studio Mukpuddy Animation and found one of the actors in an animation Mukpuddy produced were nominated for a BTVA award, but can not find anything useful about BTVA. Is this an insignificant award? There is nothing on wiki about BTVA or in mainstream media I can find. They are cited in a number of articles. Any help would be appreciated. NealeWellington ( talk) 05:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The vast majority of the award categories have a category for the year the award was established and that typically means the first year the award is issued. If you research almost any of those articles though, the award planning began in a prior year like with the Dantzig Prize (1979 vs 1982) and the Tucker Prize (1985 vs 1988).
My thinking is that readers would see the first year the award was actually issued as defining and that's what they'd navigate by. This would be similar to Category:Buildings and structures by year of completion which has the same issue with the foundation being laid in a prior year.
If you have a different perspective, let me know so we can discuss further! - RevelationDirect ( talk) 19:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello everyone, I've almost finished a draft article on trophies in professional sumo and I'd like to have your opinion on it. For the moment it's available in my sandbox but I'm thinking of posting it as a draft to get more opinions on it rather than posting it directly into main space. - OtharLuin ( talk) 10:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
As a newcomer, in order to foster a more inclusive and accessible environment for newcomers, I propose the addition of a short introductory note on how to become a contributor, join the project, and submit page requests or drafts on Wikipedia.
Experienced contributors understand the intricacies of navigating Wikipedia and WikiProject Awards's processes, but it's crucial to acknowledge that new users might not be well-versed in the platform's conventions and guidelines. By incorporating a brief introductory guide on the landing page of the WikiProject Awards or a redirect, we can empower and encourage those unfamiliar with the Wikipedia world to actively participate in its collaborative editing process.
The suggested note could cover various topics, such as:
By including this introductory note, we can bridge the gap between experienced contributors and newcomers, fostering a more welcoming environment for those who are less familiar with the Wikipedia ecosystem. It will promote transparency, encourage participation, and ultimately enhance the diversity and quality of content on Wikipedia.
I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this proposal and how we can collectively improve the onboarding experience for new contributors on Wikipedia. LightBringerToday ( talk) 20:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
For the purposes of lists of Alumni and whether a person should have an article, what are the feelings on awardees of
Thanx. Naraht ( talk) 19:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated BBC Sports Personality of the Year Coach Award for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 14:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Is it possible to add List of Indian Nobel laureates to Wikipedia:Featured topics/Nobel laureates? The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 13:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
I do not know how active is this project but would it be ok to make an article about the Nobel Laureate Signature (ACS)? [2] what are some things to consider before doing that list? ReyHahn ( talk) 16:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I've nominated Dutch Athlete of the Year as featured list candidate. Feel free to leave comments. – Editør ( talk) 15:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:ALA Best Fiction for Young Adults#Requested move 29 November 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Kiwiz1338 ( talk) 18:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Theatre World Award#Requested move 5 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 21:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Motivated by the IMO spurious assertion on the Mainpage today that " The Philippine television newscast 24 Oras has won thirty-two awards from ninety-three nominations", I've started a discussion at Template talk:Infobox awards list#Totals should be avoided. Comments there are welcome. jnestorius( talk) 14:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Category:Asteroids named as an award, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 01:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Category:Oklahoma Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 02:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
The Evita award list is newly created and nominated for Featured list status. Please feel free to comment. — IB [ Poke ] 12:19, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Many participants here create a lot of content, have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are just some of the skills considered at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.
So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:
You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
There is this discussion Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Beauty_Pageants#RFC_on_creation_of_consensus_standard related to beauty pageant winners that might be relavant to people in this project. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 06:35, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi I am very new to this, somewhat scary, but on the Wildlife Photographer of the Year wikipedia page I noticed the detail results only go to 1991, being a contestant in this competition, I have the printed portfolios for 1989 & 1990, which I can copy and send to anyone interested in entering this Data in and updating, or if given a template to fill out can enter the data and provide copies of the portfolio as well to be checked off for someone to upload. DarrylT ( talk) 23:39, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Dear fellow Wikipedians, In this edit a user has proposed to add three awards to an article about the Gokhale Method. Two of these awards have their own articles on this WikiProject: Nautilus Book Awards and Independent Publisher Book Awards. However, since both articles have not been assessed yet, and little secondary sources have been provided in it, I was wondering whether the awards are notable enough to include in the article about the Gokhale Method. Comments are welcome.-- Farang Rak Tham ( talk) 23:17, 17 October 2017 (UTC)-- Farang Rak Tham ( talk) 00:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
I'm of the opinion it's sometimes better to keep the article as a platform to highlight the award's true nature, which does more good than keeping it in the dark through deletion.
I have started a discussion to split the article National Film Award – Special Jury Award / Special Mention (Feature Film). I hope WPAW members would spare some time to join the discussion. Regards. -- Let There Be Sunshine ( talk) 09:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( non-admin closure) James ( talk/ contribs) 23:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | It was proposed in this section that
Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards/Archive 3 be
renamed and moved to
Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards.
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links:
current log •
target log |
Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes → Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards – "Prizes" is already implicated, as is a hugh amount of other stuff than cannot be bothered to be included in the title. Considering simplicity seems at hand. Please compare Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia Awards. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 01:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.
A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Awards_and_prizes
Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.— Rod talk 13:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello WikiProject Awards,
Unregistered editors cannot create articles on Wikipedia, but they can use the articles for creation process to submit drafts that registered editors can either accept and publish or decline. WikiProject Articles for creation is looking for experienced editors who want to partake in this peer review process. If you have what it takes to get involved, then please take a look at the reviewing instructions. To discuss specific AfC reviews, do so freely on the designated talk page.
There is currently a backlog of over 2800 drafts (0 very old).
If you know an editor who may be willing to help out, please use the template you are currently reading {{subst:
WPAFCInvite}}
to draw attention to this WikiProject. Many hands make light work!
Editors willing to review a variety of drafts are especially welcome. If you're interested only in reviewing certain topics, that still helps. At least 12 pending drafts relate to awards (are in the intersection of Category:Pending AfC submissions and Category:Draft-Class awards articles). Over 2000 pending drafts have not yet had a WikiProject added, so more may be in the scope of this WikiProject. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 01:21, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
This is still a half baked idea so I am throwing this into this arena to see if there is enough heat to finnish off the baking. WP has been going long enough now, that we have had a number of very valued editors pass away. For current editors we can award a WP t-shirt. How can we acknowledge the sterling work of those who are no longer with us ? My thinking is that in this age of computerized aided deign and manufacture we could inexpensively generate plaques in a similar vein to Blue plaques. Blue plaques normally are affixed to the wall of the nominees home – in the sprit of WP however, I think they ought to be (on first option) be displayed on their collage walls. WP has long shaken off the mantel of amateurism and these plaques may encourage newbie academics to view WP as something worth spending time on (so this is a plus plus). Sure, there are many passed editors that came from a non-academic background – but they went to school too didn't they. Let the plaques go up there. English heritage who authorize and erect Blue Plaques in the UK require at least 20 years must have passed since a candidate’s death. Think 2 years for our purposes would suffice as it gives enough time for reflection. I.E., these awards should be reserved for the truly worthy who have made significant contributions. Aspro ( talk) 17:39, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
If I make an award article, is it a good idea to include a list of recipients for each category? And if it's yes, should the article be included in the list project and have a list category added? ★Trekker ( talk) 18:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Even if they are, the articles need cleanup. From what I can tell from auto-translations of the sources, the "awards" are heavily promoted, but the only notability I can see is simply that they they are heavily promoted. I am not seeing significant editing from anything but WP:SPA accounts (apologies if I overlooked someone). -- Ronz ( talk) 16:49, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
While translating 44th Annie Awards in French, I've noticed discrepancies between the entries listed in the article and the list of nominees in additional sources. After a quick check of the official source, I've established these entries (about SpongeBob SquarePants and Sesame Street) are fake and immediately removed them.
I'm concerned, though. Who did this? Are there more fakes like this? Is it part of a wider marketing campaign or "test" of Wikipedia? I'm not used to Wikipedia in English and need to opinion about it. J. N. Squire ( talk) 20:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Should the template name be {{WikiProject Awards|class=stub|importance=low}} or maybe {{WikiProject Awards and prizes|class=stub|importance=low}}/nowiki> or maybe <nowiki>{{WikiProject Awards and Prizes|class=stub|importance=low}} or maybe something else? All of those template examples result in the proper categories of Stub-Class awards articles and Low-importance awards articles, but the talk page has the project name in green, showing a redirect.
I would standardize on one name which is not a redirect, but I don't know which one produces the right result.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 00:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
There's a deletion discussion within this WikiProject's scope going on at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foresight Institute Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology. The main area of contention is whether there are sufficient independent secondary sources for the award. Feedback would be appreciated. Antony–22 ( talk⁄ contribs) 10:51, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Editor input is requested at this thread Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Meryl Streep#Awards descriptions. MarnetteD| Talk 18:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Should Template:WikiProject Awards and prizes be moved to Template:WikiProject Awards, and should the message be included to remove "prizes" from the title of the project? --- Another Believer ( Talk) 20:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:Audie_Award_Winners
Hi. I created the above list article and submitted it for review. It lists the categories and winners for the Audie Awards that is an article that belongs to this group. Thanks! SJTatsu ( talk) 16:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
There's an RfC going on at Talk:Feynman Prize in Nanotechnology#RfC on list format on whether lists of awardees should be in a table or bulleted list format, and whether they should contain photographs and other supplementary columns. Feedback would be appreciated! Antony–22 ( talk⁄ contribs) 04:23, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
There seems to be a strong push to ban these kinds of articles from using tables or including photographs. Feedback on this proposal would be appreciated. Antony–22 ( talk⁄ contribs) 04:46, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Are Forbes lists (such as top 100 most influential celebrities etc. ) and lists of similar standing to be included on Lists of awards and nominations received by individuals? If so, are they to be included in any awards count? Such as taking #1 to mean a win? Couldn't find anything about this in archives of this page NicklausAU 07:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Editors in this WikiProject may be interested in the featured quality source review RFC that has been ongoing. It would change the featured article candidate process (FAC) so that source reviews would need to occur prior to any other reviews for FAC. Your comments are appreciated. -- Izno Repeat ( talk) 21:46, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Hoping this is an appropriate place to reach out, I'd like to request a peer review and/or advice on ways to improve the 2018 Nobel Peace Prize article. The article's quality rating is "stub," and, after seeing an example on this Project's article page, I changed the article's importance rating from "high" to "top". Since I'm not sure what's generally well known about the award and the 2018 laureates, I've erred on the side of caution by sourcing most statements and (perhaps too heavily) quoting sources. Any tips and advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! Litjade ( talk) 11:11, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Notability (awards).
DBig
Xrayᗙ
21:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi there! I would like to request a peer review and edit the following information for the Shaw Prize article:
1. As at today, 12 of the Nobel laureates – Jules Hoffmann, Bruce Beutler, Saul Perlmutter, Adam Riess, Shinya Yamanka, Robert Lefkowitz and Brian Schmidt, Jeffrey C Hall, Michael Rosbash, Michael W Young, Kip S Thourne, Rainer Weiss – were previous laureates of the Shaw Prize.
2. Board of Adjudicators: Frank H Shu (Chairman), Kenneth Young, Reinhard Genzel, Randy W Schekman, Timothy Gowers
3. Selection Committees 2018-2019:
Astronomy – Reinhard Genzel (Chairman), Chryssa Kouveliotou, John A Peacock, Scott Tremaine, Ewine Van Dishoeck
Life Science and Medicine – Randy W Schekman (Chairman), Bonnie L Bassler, Hans Clevers, Carol Greider, Richard Lifton, Xiaodong Wang, Huda Zoghbi
Mathematical Sciences – Timothy Gowers (Chairman), Hélène Esnault, Felix Otto, Paul Seidel, Wendelin Werner
Pn0824 (
talk)
03:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
The purpose of this RfC is to discuss which categories of an adult award are notable. As it is known, adult awards have more than a hundred categories and consequently by WP:INHERIT not all are notable. [1]
Which articles should be created? Which should be excluded? Which categories are encyclopedic and which ones fall into WP:NOT and should be taken from articles? There is a Gender bias on Wikipedia, since there are AVN articles of Best Actress, Best Supporting Actress, Actress Female Performer of the Year, but there are none about actors, directors or films? Guilherme Burn ( talk) 15:59, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude ( talk) 06:48, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
I am proposing an improvement project for some improvement on articles pertaining to Star Awards for all articles, especially the pre-2005 articles, which I have not yet done so. It is basically changing from a list-form to the one seen similar to award-ceremonies (like the one in post-2005). I also got information for presenters and some resources from the Chinese version of Star Awards. The reason is because that not only the article is not only to improve the consistency of works, but also to fix proofing, and removing unnecessary red links that are still exist in these articles.
I had tried to seek help on manpower for the article like asking Unknown152438 and LMX97 but they were busy. I too, might be busy, but i took the chance to request a proposal to help out on improving the award articles, similar to the one seen in the Primetime Emmy Awards and Academy Awards.
I would also wish to do the same for Grammy Awards since they use a list-form instead of award-ceremony form. Would you initiate the improvement project?
Yours regards, ( Sculture65 ( talk) 10:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC))
P.S., this year marks the 25th (silver) anniversary of Star Awards, it would be so nice to improve the article with a fashion.
Discussion and survey at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Korea/Popular_culture#Are_music_show_wins_notable? AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 23:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Academy Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Academy Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America 1000 09:41, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
Does anyone know of a good source for the Canadian television Gemini Awards, which have been supplanted by the Canadian Screen Awards? I spent a bit of time working on a big table and then found out my source is no good. I haven't been able to find anything at the official site academy.ca/awards but maybe I'm not looking hard enough. – Reidgreg ( talk) 20:12, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Should there be a category for recipients of this award? If so, please would someone create it and add John Gilhooly. Thanks. Pam D 07:15, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
I have proposed renaming of the last four "Awards and prizes" categories; please see WP:CFDS within the next 48 hours. – Fayenatic London 09:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
I have nominated List of Scripps National Spelling Bee champions for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 11:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
/info/en/?search=World_Food_Prize#Laureates
Information to be added or removed: Change "Founder and leader of East-West Seed..." to "Founder and honorary chairman of East-West Seed..." Explanation of issue: Mr Groot's current title is Honorary Chairman of East-West Seed. His son, Ard Groot, is Chairman and Bert van der Feltz is the company's President & CEO. References supporting change: [1] [2] BrenRoa ( talk) 04:40, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
References
{{Connected contributor|User1=BrenRoa |U1-declared=yes| U1-otherlinks=(Optional) I am an employee of the company associated with the edit I am requesting.}}
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma ( talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
It is important to note that the fee for entering the competition is a whopping 122 euros (artists over 25 yrs old), and 97,6 euros (25 and under). They actually use the term "free theme" for submissions, ignoring the tremendous wealth gap this represents for a vast majority of artists. This is part of a mega cottage industry financed on the backs of struggling artists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reroot ( talk • contribs) 00:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Okay, so through various different pages and editing I've come across a question/issue with {{ Infobox awards list}} and {{ Infobox musician awards}}. Specifically, that there is no "pending" in either template, causing some editors to stick the whole damn template into the article space ( example 2). There is also some discrepancy (mentioned but not dealt with here) about counting nominations even if they turned into wins, so I have two questions:
In other words, I'm mostly looking for a little more consistency between all of the various articles that use (or subst'ed) the awards templates. Primefac ( talk) 22:50, 12 August 2019 (UTC) (please do not ping on reply)
Greetings! I have recently relisted a requested move discussion at Talk:Writers Guild of America Awards 2019#Requested move 23 January 2020, regarding a page relating to this WikiProject. Discussion and opinions are invited. Thanks, Wikipedical ( talk) 20:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Editors of this project may be interested in a discussion at Template talk:Infobox awards list, concerning the content of the template's footnote. – Tera tix ₵ 09:46, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
I have nominated Tony Award for Best Featured Actor in a Play for demotion at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Tony Award for Best Featured Actor in a Play/archive1. This notice serves as service of such. Therapyisgood ( talk) 08:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Formal notice that Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Play is up for demotion at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Play/archive1. Therapyisgood ( talk) 09:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
As an interested party, I am providing notice to this WikiProject about a new Request for Proposal that is proposing an exception to the guideline WP:OCAWARD in the policy Overcategorization. The Rfc will be here when the system gets around to adding it: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines. And also in the proposals Rfc. However, it is ready for comment directly in the guideline talk page: Wikipedia talk:Overcategorization#RfC on exceptions to WP:OCAWARD. Your insights would be appreciated. Thank you. dawnleelynn (talk) 20:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
We have now the possibility to easier link Nobelprize.org using a template and Wikidata. For background and implementation see Version 1 is now implemented for creating links in Wikipedia using Nobel Laureate API ID (P8024) and please help push this message out to Wikipedia languages that can benefit from using it and let me know if you need help with creating new Templates - Salgo60 ( talk) 22:29, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
There doesn't seem to be an agreed "best practice" for lists of winners of awards which have shortlists - interested parties might like to join the discussion at Talk:Wainwright Prize. Pam D 12:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
I just came across this study [1] that analyzes Nobel laureates from various perspectives over time, e.g. in terms of their geographic and institutional as well as collaboration/ training patterns. It also has some useful figures, particularly in the supplement, though some of these have been subject to a correction. [2] -- Daniel Mietchen ( talk) 23:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
References
Category:XBIZ Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Right cite ( talk) 17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:AVN Award winners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Right cite ( talk) 17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Template talk:Infobox award § Using image for current award rather than text. {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk
18:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Is this assessment legitimate? I don't think Wikipedia barnstars are in your scope. 1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 20:30, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
This list was previously totally unsourced save for two refs in the lead. I have since sourced the entire table and expanded the lead somewhat. I would like to possibly nominate it for featured list status one day but until then I was hoping someone could take a look and see if there are any further improvements to be made that I have missed. Here doesn't seem to be very active but I don't know where else would be equally appropriate to ask. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 23:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Browsing the list of Top-importance awards Category:Top-importance awards articles there seem to be some very strange entries.
The most egregious is the large set of US-state level Emmy awards. This is probably not so much the result of systemic bias, more the unnoticed behaviour of a single editor ten years ago who has not been corrected since. The criterion at WP:WPAW#Rating articles is that "Top" should go to awards which are "familiar worldwide", with the excellent example of the Nobel prizes. So I'm asking now if there is any reason why this set of US-state level Emmys should not be immediately re-graded?
More broadly, I find some awards which are significant in my country in their field and are known to some extent internationally are listed as Low. In general, articles about non-USA awards are one, two, or three levels importance levels lower than their USA equivalents, lower if the country is not English-speaking. For example, all the Theatre award articles, such as Molière Award contain a sentence such as "The Molière Awards are considered the highest French theatre honour, the equivalent to the American Tony Award, the British Olivier Award and the Spanish Premios Max." Yet the importance ratings are currently Tony:Top, Olivier:High, Moliere:Mid. (Max is not yet rated.) This is just one example, but it does have the appearance of systemic bias. -- Monxton ( talk) 18:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
WikiProject Awards|importance= |class=}}
. Whereas what you actually inserted was {{
WikiProject Awards|importance=Top |class=Start}}
. By doing so you assessed your own page. You have been shown the evidence, please stop denying it. --
Monxton (
talk)
05:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
We could do with some expert opinion at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2021 January 1#Red_pin_badge_on_lapel_of_conductor_Riccardo_Muti_in_2021_Wiener_Philharmoniker_New_Year's_day_concert; any assistance will be most gratefully received. Alansplodge ( talk) 16:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
I've asked here if the James Beard Foundation Award should be split. Feedback welcome! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 03:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Could someone from this WikiProject take a look at AMAA Who's Who in the Martial Arts Hall of Fame and assess it? It appears to have been created directly in the mainspace. Since it didn’t go through WP:AFC and didn’t have a talk page until to today, it never seems to have been assessed. There’s no article about the American Martial Arts Alliance itself, it’s a bit odd that there would an article one of its awards ceremonies or its HOF. — Marchjuly ( talk) 22:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Does anyone else think the number of navboxes being created for winners of various American Music Award is leaning towards overkill? See Category:American Music Award templates. Are they needed at all? Are they needed for every award category? A CfD for a similar Grammy Award navboxes occurred in 2014 with a consensus to delete all but the major award categories (although some from that group have since been recreated). It just seems like something that can quickly lead to template bloat.
Personally, I would limit such navboxes for US awards to the four majors (EGOT). I mean, the number of navboxes in some actor articles is a joke ( Cate Blanchett has over 40). It seems like there's one for every city's film critics association, such as those in Category:Houston Film Critics Society Awards templates and Category:San Diego Film Critics Society Awards templates. Now I'm going off on a tangent, but perhaps these types of template creations should be reeled in a bit. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 05:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I've asked here if editors could review the appropriateness of including additional recognition to the article for film producer and philanthropist Jeff Skoll. I welcome feedback. I have a conflict of interest because I work with the Jeff Skoll Group. I am careful to build consensus in place of directly editing the article. Thank you. JSG Lindsey ( talk) 17:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
I have created a new delsort category dedicated to awards, Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Awards ( WP:DELSORT/AWARDS). Surprised this didn't already exist. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 01:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Is there some rule in an award guideline that says what order a list of awards should be in? Most lists are done chronologically, earliest year first, and many of the list of awards of so-and-so are listed by award name. It looks a little funny not to be sorted by year. I know it can be changed on a desktop by clicking the column header but it would seem to me the first instance that hits you in the face should go year by year. I am having this discussion at Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Elliot Page. To be honest, as a reader I would like to see it ordered by year and within the year ordered alphabetical by nominated work. Then if a reader wants to see it by award they can alter the column. Right now it seems backwards. Is there an award guideline that mandates what way we do it? Fyunck(click) ( talk) 19:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, my name is Mira and I am the employee representative for Sherwin-Williams here on Wikipedia. I posted a recent request on the Sherwin-Williams talk page to collaborate with editors on improvements to the current article's Awards and recognition section, while following the site's guidelines for editors like me with a conflict of interest. As an employee, I will refrain from editing the article and related articles directly. Generally, I'm proposing that the section include a list of major awards and rankings the company has received from Forbes in recent years. The request came on the heels of a recent update to the section where a helpful editor removed some poorly sourced content identified through Talk page discussions. The same editor has weighed in to say they do not think the list of Forbes awards is worthy of inclusion. I'm posting here to gather thoughts from others about what kinds of recognition are acceptable and will, of course, defer to the community's consensus. Below is the list of Forbes awards I'm proposing for inclusion in the live article. My full request and related discussion can be viewed at the Sherwin-Williams Talk page.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts or guidance editors here may have to offer. MiraSherwin-Williams ( talk) 23:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Any way the project can limit the amount of over links /template spam.
Moxy-
02:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Looking for helpful input in regards to the 'producer' parameter for Template:Infobox award. Any help/input would be greatly appreciated. Magitroopa ( talk) 06:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
While stub-sorting Anna Czóbel I corrected the spelling of the red link Meritorius Artist of Hungary to Meritorious Artist of Hungary but it is still a red link. I see there are two categories: Category:Merited artists of the Republic of Hungary and Category:Artists of Merit of the Hungarian People's Republic: are these identical? If so, they need to be combined. If not, could someone annotate the categories to make it clear which of them, if either, relates to "Meritorious Artist..."? I've tried to look at the Hungarian language wikipedia but just got more confused. I've made a similar post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hungary. Pam D 19:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I am a German wiki editor and last month I wrote a comprehensive update of the German article " Europäischer Baum des Jahres". In Wikimedia Commons now has a lot of freely available images related to the trees under the category European Tree of the Year. Today, the live award ceremony can be seen under this Channel. I propose an update of the English-language page and would be happy if someone could contribute.-- Cookroach ( talk) 10:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Feel free to contribute to the discussion about adding automatic short descriptions to {{ Infobox award}} at Template talk:Infobox award#Automatic short description. -- Trialpears ( talk) 17:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
I created Africa Food Prize, feel free to improve. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 11:41, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Talk:Greta Thunberg § proposal to split section for honors.
Sean Stephens (
talk)
11:33, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prix Versailles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prix Versailles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. I am posting here in the hope that page watchers will be able to provide evidence on whether the award is notable or not. TSventon ( talk) 22:06, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Wikidata provides information on awards but if you want to learn about laureates, you need to write SPARQL queries (and this is often difficult).
I've designed a wikidata template ( d:Template:TP award) which provides useful queries for templates. It can be easily added to talk pages in Wikidata using d:Template:Item documentation (just add {{Item documentation}}). See example d:Talk:Q1624297.
I think that it could be useful to complete Wikipedia articles about awards.
Tell me if you find it useful and feel free to give me feedback. PAC2 ( talk) 07:39, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Next Manga Award#Requested move 9 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 05:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Eisner Award#Requested move 17 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 11:36, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
I have nominated List of Nobel laureates affiliated with Princeton University for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. TompaDompa ( talk) 01:48, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
There is a split propasal pertaining to WP:Barnstars. The proposal can be found here, thank you. Jerm ( talk) 20:56, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Template talk:Table cell templates § Color change in "Nominated".
RunningTiger123 (
talk)
03:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Per several featured lists promoted within the last few years, including this, this, this and this, there are many instances where shared nominees are listed in the category column. However, on Park Min-young, user @ Paper9oll does not think this logical. I, on the other hand, believe that it is 100% fine when formatting it in that way and it makes sorting much cleaner, where it makes all categories for a single work sorted together instead of disjointed in the table. Are any inputs available for either formats? ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 06:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
If I may, in music, an artist/their song/album/music video can be nominated, so a column showing the various names/titles nom'd is necessary. With actors, generally speaking, it's mostly themselves that are nom'd and no one/nothing else (though shared noms obv occur), so I guess rather than having a col spanning 30 or 40 rows to indicate "Herself" or "Himself" (as we see on solo artist award pages), it's excluded altogether. While I understand the possible reasoning behind it, I think shared noms (on the above and for PMY) and any add. cmmts in the Cat. col should be cited as a footnote (as appears to have been done for some of the earlier entries in Theron's table), rather than stated next to the cat. title in brackets. The column still is "Category" after all, and an actor is a nominee, not a category. -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 04:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:AwardsInCenturyHeader has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
AdrianHObradors (
talk)
19:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
)and turns it into something like
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{ cite web}}, {{ cite journal}} and {{ doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
I have opened a discussion here, about possibly standardising if production Peabody Awards are listed for individuals named in the citation, which may also concern this project. Kingsif ( talk) 11:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates § Pulitzer Prizes. Flagging for this project because if the nomination succeeds, it may set a precedent for
WP:ITNR to post the Pulitzers each year. {{u|
Sdkb}}
talk
18:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Vodafone Ghana Music Awards#Requested move 4 May 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 16:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Requesting input at an RFC concerning who awards medals page. GoodDay ( talk) 18:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
There is a proposal about the scope and potential renaming of this article, for which other editors' input is welcome. MartinPoulter ( talk) 15:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Please see discussion at User talk:Carlobunnie#Winners ref, and edit summaries of List of awards and nominations received by Sandra Bullock, Yet to Come (The Most Beautiful Moment), and List of awards and nominations received by BTS
Should nominations have a ref that only includes nominations, or a ref that includes both nominations and winners. Thanks, Indagate ( talk) Indagate ( talk) 19:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Awards and accessibility under Vector 2022, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This discussion is probably more directly relevant to this WikiProject, but since this talk page gets minimal responses and I noticed the issues on film lists first, I placed the discussion there. Thank you.
RunningTiger123 (
talk)
19:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Is there a standard style for writing an award title in prose? Does it need punctuation? e.g. which of the following (if any) are correct?
Thanks. -- Jameboy ( talk) 17:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated BBC Young Sports Personality of the Year for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 16:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
I can't find the London Gazette listing for Gloria Cameron (aka Florence Cameron): see https://newspaperarchive.com/other-articles-clipping-jan-03-1980-3729948/. She is listed OK in The Times, but the civilian MBEs don't seem to be in the issue of London Gazette which is linked from the article. Any ideas? Pam D 19:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at
Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent
Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class=
parameter to {{
WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{ WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{
WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present.
Aymatth2 (
talk)
14:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Orders, Decorations, and Medals/Archive 7#Deprecated language in citations for UK honours about whether citations should be updated to today's language, eg changing the 1980 "For service to the disabled." to "For service to disabled people." Members of this Wikiproject may have a view: please comment there. Pam D 17:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
In the above section on the Charlie Puth BLP, user Efernandez18 created an awards show entry called iHeartRadio Titanium Awards, for two radio spins awards Puth apparently received from IHR, in February. However this is not an actual ceremony or award show of any kind. From google searching, the Titanium Award was presented at the 2018 iHRMAs for the first time (per an iHeart press rel) and subsequent recipients were awarded throughout each year by IH, not at the actual IHRAs. I adjusted the additions with appropriate sourcing for both entries, but Efernandez18 changed it again a week later to what is presently seen in the table. He does not seem to care that it not an actual award show/ceremony or that one of the entries remains unsourced. Can anyone advise the best way to handle this? -- Carlobunnie ( talk) 18:13, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi - I am drafting an article on the New Zealand animation studio Mukpuddy Animation and found one of the actors in an animation Mukpuddy produced were nominated for a BTVA award, but can not find anything useful about BTVA. Is this an insignificant award? There is nothing on wiki about BTVA or in mainstream media I can find. They are cited in a number of articles. Any help would be appreciated. NealeWellington ( talk) 05:30, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
The vast majority of the award categories have a category for the year the award was established and that typically means the first year the award is issued. If you research almost any of those articles though, the award planning began in a prior year like with the Dantzig Prize (1979 vs 1982) and the Tucker Prize (1985 vs 1988).
My thinking is that readers would see the first year the award was actually issued as defining and that's what they'd navigate by. This would be similar to Category:Buildings and structures by year of completion which has the same issue with the foundation being laid in a prior year.
If you have a different perspective, let me know so we can discuss further! - RevelationDirect ( talk) 19:43, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello everyone, I've almost finished a draft article on trophies in professional sumo and I'd like to have your opinion on it. For the moment it's available in my sandbox but I'm thinking of posting it as a draft to get more opinions on it rather than posting it directly into main space. - OtharLuin ( talk) 10:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
As a newcomer, in order to foster a more inclusive and accessible environment for newcomers, I propose the addition of a short introductory note on how to become a contributor, join the project, and submit page requests or drafts on Wikipedia.
Experienced contributors understand the intricacies of navigating Wikipedia and WikiProject Awards's processes, but it's crucial to acknowledge that new users might not be well-versed in the platform's conventions and guidelines. By incorporating a brief introductory guide on the landing page of the WikiProject Awards or a redirect, we can empower and encourage those unfamiliar with the Wikipedia world to actively participate in its collaborative editing process.
The suggested note could cover various topics, such as:
By including this introductory note, we can bridge the gap between experienced contributors and newcomers, fostering a more welcoming environment for those who are less familiar with the Wikipedia ecosystem. It will promote transparency, encourage participation, and ultimately enhance the diversity and quality of content on Wikipedia.
I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this proposal and how we can collectively improve the onboarding experience for new contributors on Wikipedia. LightBringerToday ( talk) 20:07, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
For the purposes of lists of Alumni and whether a person should have an article, what are the feelings on awardees of
Thanx. Naraht ( talk) 19:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated BBC Sports Personality of the Year Coach Award for featured list removal. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 14:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Is it possible to add List of Indian Nobel laureates to Wikipedia:Featured topics/Nobel laureates? The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 13:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
I do not know how active is this project but would it be ok to make an article about the Nobel Laureate Signature (ACS)? [2] what are some things to consider before doing that list? ReyHahn ( talk) 16:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
I've nominated Dutch Athlete of the Year as featured list candidate. Feel free to leave comments. – Editør ( talk) 15:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:ALA Best Fiction for Young Adults#Requested move 29 November 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Kiwiz1338 ( talk) 18:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Theatre World Award#Requested move 5 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 21:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Motivated by the IMO spurious assertion on the Mainpage today that " The Philippine television newscast 24 Oras has won thirty-two awards from ninety-three nominations", I've started a discussion at Template talk:Infobox awards list#Totals should be avoided. Comments there are welcome. jnestorius( talk) 14:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)