Final (133/0/3); Closed as successful by – xeno talk at 13:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Reaper Eternal ( talk · contribs) – Ladies and gentlemen, it is my great honour to be able to present to you Reaper Eternal, for your consideration for adminship. Reaper Eternal is one of the most trustworthy, level-headed and sensible editors I have come across for a good while. He is one one of a a very small group of non-admins to be trusted with edit filter management rights, he is a prolific and dedicated vandal fighter and a bit of a wikignome. That's well and good, I hear you say, but we have bots that can do a reasonable job of most of those tasks. Ah yes, but Reaper Eternal has proven that he does such things because he enjoys them, not because he lacks the talent to do anything else. He's written a Featured Article, cirrus cloud (which is well worth a read), and two other Good Articles. He's also taken on several GA reviews. His talk page and archives, as well as numerous other discussions in which he's been involved show that he plays nicely with other editors—newbies and veterans alike—and is not too proud to admit it when he made a mistake.
All things considered, I think Reaper Eternal would make an excellent administrator. He would do what he could to make life easier for the good guys—the gnomes, the vandal fighters and, of course, the writers—and harder for the bad guys—the sockpupeteers, the long-term abusers, the vandals and the spammers. I sincerely hope that the community agrees. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
{{
helpme}}
requests, and would like to be able to help with {{
adminhelp}}
requests.{{
uw-agf1}}
or a {{
uw-npa1}}
is inappropriate, as the regular almost certainly knows about
WP:NPA or
WP:AGF. On the other hand, a {{
uw-3rr}}
would be appropriate to warn the other editor that he may be blocked if he reverts again.
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 00:46, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replyPlease keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
{{
wi}}
articles as an admin, and I will allow more time before tagging articles for speedy deletion. Cheers!
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 17:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
replyFinal (133/0/3); Closed as successful by – xeno talk at 13:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Reaper Eternal ( talk · contribs) – Ladies and gentlemen, it is my great honour to be able to present to you Reaper Eternal, for your consideration for adminship. Reaper Eternal is one of the most trustworthy, level-headed and sensible editors I have come across for a good while. He is one one of a a very small group of non-admins to be trusted with edit filter management rights, he is a prolific and dedicated vandal fighter and a bit of a wikignome. That's well and good, I hear you say, but we have bots that can do a reasonable job of most of those tasks. Ah yes, but Reaper Eternal has proven that he does such things because he enjoys them, not because he lacks the talent to do anything else. He's written a Featured Article, cirrus cloud (which is well worth a read), and two other Good Articles. He's also taken on several GA reviews. His talk page and archives, as well as numerous other discussions in which he's been involved show that he plays nicely with other editors—newbies and veterans alike—and is not too proud to admit it when he made a mistake.
All things considered, I think Reaper Eternal would make an excellent administrator. He would do what he could to make life easier for the good guys—the gnomes, the vandal fighters and, of course, the writers—and harder for the bad guys—the sockpupeteers, the long-term abusers, the vandals and the spammers. I sincerely hope that the community agrees. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
{{
helpme}}
requests, and would like to be able to help with {{
adminhelp}}
requests.{{
uw-agf1}}
or a {{
uw-npa1}}
is inappropriate, as the regular almost certainly knows about
WP:NPA or
WP:AGF. On the other hand, a {{
uw-3rr}}
would be appropriate to warn the other editor that he may be blocked if he reverts again.
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 00:46, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
replyPlease keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
{{
wi}}
articles as an admin, and I will allow more time before tagging articles for speedy deletion. Cheers!
Reaper Eternal (
talk) 17:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
reply