The review department of the Chicago WikiProject is the project's main forum for conducting detailed reviews—both formal and informal—of particular articles and other content within its scope.
This department provides a convenient collection of Chicago content currently undergoing featured content reviews outside the project:
Several other discussion types use transclusion friendly discussion. Below you will also find external discussion for
WikiProject peer reviews
A
Wikipedia Peer Review can be a useful way to improve articles associated with this WikiProject.
You can keep track of new reviews by watching this page; do that by clicking here. If your project has article alerts enabled, reviews will display on that list too.
To list your review below:
[[Wikipedia:Peer review/Name of nominated article/archiveN]] - July 2024
at the top of the list of requests below (where N is the archive number).When the review is finished:
[[Wikipedia:Peer review/Name of nominated article/archiveN]] - MONTH - YEAR
from the list of active reviews to the list of old reviews.To change how your project's peer reviews are managed, see here.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to eventually nominate it for FA. This article has already had a peer review and recently passed GA. I would appreciate suggestions on how to make it more comprehensive and how to improve the prose.
Thanks, Benny the mascot ( talk) 19:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
I am sorry this is taking me so long - will review in the next 24 hours. Sorry, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:02, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Thanks for being so understanding - this looks pretty good to me, so here are some mostly nit-picky suggestions for improvement.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
I will try to point out language that needs work here, as well as any other issues that I notice
Hope this helps, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Featured article candidates are controlled by an external process; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To nominate an article for featured article status, or to comment on a nomination, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the featured article candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Name of candidate article}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is promoted:
Featured article reviews are controlled by an external process; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To list an article for featured article review, or to comment on a listing, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the featured article removal candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Featured article review/Name of candidate article}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is demoted:
Featured lists are controlled by an external process; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To list an article for featured list candidacy, or to comment on a listing, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the featured list candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Name of candidate list}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is promoted:
Featured list removals are controlled by an external process; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To list an article for featured list removal candidacy, or to comment on a listing, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the featured list removal candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Name of candidate list}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is demoted:
Non-article featured content candidates are controlled by one of several external processes, depending on the type of content; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To nominate something for featured status, or to comment on a nomination, you must follow the appropriate official instructions:
To transclude the non-article featured content candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Name of candidate picture}}, {{Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Name of candidate portal}}, {{Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Name of candidate topic}}, or {{Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/Name of candidate sound}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is promoted:
Good article reassessments are controlled by an external process; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To list an article for featured article review, or to comment on a listing, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the good article reassessment candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Name of candidate article}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is demoted:
Articles for deletion discussions are controlled by external processes; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To list an article for article for deletion review, or to comment on a listing, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the articles for deletion discussions, add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Name of candidate article}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is deleted:
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. A possible alternative to deletion would be a redirect, but I'm not sure what would be the best target. toweli ( talk) 07:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
No indication of notability, cannot find sources besides routine press releases. Fails WP:NORG Jay Jay What did I do? 21:04, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. I'm not sure what would be the better redirect target of the two bands mentioned in the article. toweli ( talk) 14:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
15:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Small reservoir without significant, independent coverage to justify an article. SeymourHolcomb ( talk) 16:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
13:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTA AND WP:GNG BryceM2001 ( talk) 21:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opinion divided between Keep, Delete and Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I've cleaned this article up a bit but after looking for additional information to add more substance, I don't think this meets WP:GNG. He's certainly had his name attached to many published papers, but they are pretty niche in content and many co-authors don't have their own pages. Looking at the page history, it appears that this may have been initially authored by a student or someone associated with him. Most recently, an IP user copy/pasted a numbered list of his papers but started at "112" which makes me think it came from somewhere else, but I can't find where. Lindsey40186 (talk) 01:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no consensus. I've closed hundreds of AFD discussions and for academics, citation counts are routinely considered in discussing notability. They are not the only factor but they are a factor that shouldn't be casually dismissed as being arbitrary.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Andruzzi
This is a good example of WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL. This is one proposal, but it is so early in the process that this article is not warranted. Angryapathy ( talk) 15:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
17:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
18:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
As I stated before, then it gets moved to [9] and in the case of arenas, [10] Roberto221 ( talk) 08:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 22:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
The review department of the Chicago WikiProject is the project's main forum for conducting detailed reviews—both formal and informal—of particular articles and other content within its scope.
This department provides a convenient collection of Chicago content currently undergoing featured content reviews outside the project:
Several other discussion types use transclusion friendly discussion. Below you will also find external discussion for
WikiProject peer reviews
A
Wikipedia Peer Review can be a useful way to improve articles associated with this WikiProject.
You can keep track of new reviews by watching this page; do that by clicking here. If your project has article alerts enabled, reviews will display on that list too.
To list your review below:
[[Wikipedia:Peer review/Name of nominated article/archiveN]] - July 2024
at the top of the list of requests below (where N is the archive number).When the review is finished:
[[Wikipedia:Peer review/Name of nominated article/archiveN]] - MONTH - YEAR
from the list of active reviews to the list of old reviews.To change how your project's peer reviews are managed, see here.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to eventually nominate it for FA. This article has already had a peer review and recently passed GA. I would appreciate suggestions on how to make it more comprehensive and how to improve the prose.
Thanks, Benny the mascot ( talk) 19:42, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
I am sorry this is taking me so long - will review in the next 24 hours. Sorry, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:02, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Thanks for being so understanding - this looks pretty good to me, so here are some mostly nit-picky suggestions for improvement.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). I do not watch peer reviews, so if you have questions or comments, please contact me on my talk page. Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
I will try to point out language that needs work here, as well as any other issues that I notice
Hope this helps, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Featured article candidates are controlled by an external process; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To nominate an article for featured article status, or to comment on a nomination, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the featured article candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Name of candidate article}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is promoted:
Featured article reviews are controlled by an external process; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To list an article for featured article review, or to comment on a listing, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the featured article removal candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Featured article review/Name of candidate article}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is demoted:
Featured lists are controlled by an external process; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To list an article for featured list candidacy, or to comment on a listing, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the featured list candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Name of candidate list}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is promoted:
Featured list removals are controlled by an external process; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To list an article for featured list removal candidacy, or to comment on a listing, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the featured list removal candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Name of candidate list}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is demoted:
Non-article featured content candidates are controlled by one of several external processes, depending on the type of content; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To nominate something for featured status, or to comment on a nomination, you must follow the appropriate official instructions:
To transclude the non-article featured content candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Name of candidate picture}}, {{Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Name of candidate portal}}, {{Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Name of candidate topic}}, or {{Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates/Name of candidate sound}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is promoted:
Good article reassessments are controlled by an external process; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To list an article for featured article review, or to comment on a listing, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the good article reassessment candidate discussion, add {{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Name of candidate article}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is demoted:
Articles for deletion discussions are controlled by external processes; the listing below is merely a duplicate for the project's convenience. To list an article for article for deletion review, or to comment on a listing, you must follow the official instructions.
To transclude the articles for deletion discussions, add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Name of candidate article}}
to the top of the list.
If the article is deleted:
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. A possible alternative to deletion would be a redirect, but I'm not sure what would be the best target. toweli ( talk) 07:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
No indication of notability, cannot find sources besides routine press releases. Fails WP:NORG Jay Jay What did I do? 21:04, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. I'm not sure what would be the better redirect target of the two bands mentioned in the article. toweli ( talk) 14:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
15:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Small reservoir without significant, independent coverage to justify an article. SeymourHolcomb ( talk) 16:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Star
Mississippi
13:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTA AND WP:GNG BryceM2001 ( talk) 21:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Opinion divided between Keep, Delete and Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
23:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
I've cleaned this article up a bit but after looking for additional information to add more substance, I don't think this meets WP:GNG. He's certainly had his name attached to many published papers, but they are pretty niche in content and many co-authors don't have their own pages. Looking at the page history, it appears that this may have been initially authored by a student or someone associated with him. Most recently, an IP user copy/pasted a numbered list of his papers but started at "112" which makes me think it came from somewhere else, but I can't find where. Lindsey40186 (talk) 01:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
01:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no consensus. I've closed hundreds of AFD discussions and for academics, citation counts are routinely considered in discussing notability. They are not the only factor but they are a factor that shouldn't be casually dismissed as being arbitrary.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Andruzzi
This is a good example of WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL. This is one proposal, but it is so early in the process that this article is not warranted. Angryapathy ( talk) 15:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
17:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Cocobb8 (💬
talk • ✏️
contribs)
18:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
As I stated before, then it gets moved to [9] and in the case of arenas, [10] Roberto221 ( talk) 08:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 22:41, 28 June 2024 (UTC)