This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 13, 2024.
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21#EasyEnglish
> browsing wikipedia instead of having a life
> le funny shitpost greentext redirects have arrived
> chuckle to self
> realize that they're inevitably gonna get RFD'd and deleted at some point
> cry inside
> idea
> send them out in style befitting the shitposty nature of them
> smile
> remember that it's all meaningless and won't change the outcome anyway
> continue to cry inside whilst bemoaning my lack of a life
Anyway I suggest we delete these. 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 ( talk・ edits) 22:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21#Controversy over study buddies for international students in China
St. Stephen's School Rome is not known as "St. Stephen's International School". Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 20:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 22:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
<title>
of it is St. Stephen's International School | Welcome to St. Stephen's | St Stephen's School
- the school's still using 'St. Stephen's International School' within its branding and such, so I'd say the redirect does make sense.
🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (
talk・
edits) 23:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
This phrase is mentioned in the target article at Capitalism#Modernity, but not in a way that will probably satisfy anyone looking up at this phrase to locate a definition for this redirect. The phrasing of the redirect hints some sort of WP:REDYES potential. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 06:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 22:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Seems unclear what the target of these redirects should be. Honestly, I'm surprised that their target is not Company, though I guess an Economy could, in theory, create jobs as well. Hmm, even a Government can create jobs... Steel1943 ( talk) 21:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 06:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 22:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Since the subjects of these redirects probably refer to work done on a contract basis, I do not believe the current target or its section Employment#Independent contractor to be the best target for these redirects. From what I found, the best fit for these redirects is probably retarget to Employment contract. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
work done on a contract basisreferred to as "contract labor." - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 02:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 06:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 21:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Please delete. Redirect is circular when starting from target dab page; arguably squatting on article namespace and certainly matches RFD category 10. Bernanke's Crossbow ( talk) 21:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Power of Two
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#List of "Cops/COPS/C.O.P.S." episodes
I had originally targeted this to
F1NN5TER.
Wbm1058 has retargeted with the argument redirect to the more likely misspelling – only one extra letter is there, no digits
. I would agree with that if this were an arbitrary typo, but, as established in the prose of the article itself, this is a known misspelling of the subject's screen name—not borne of fat fingers, but people deliberately converting the
leetspeak canonical name to regular characters—even occurring in marginally reliable sources
like Game Rant. If you search Twitter for finnster
you'll see the misspelling is ubiquitous, with F1NN5TER being the subject of an outright majority of tweets containing the string. Googling the string—even Incognito, on public wifi, with before:2024
—the clear majority of hits I get are about F1NN5TER; the handful of exceptions are about non-notable animals and a one-off SNL character who had no lines. On the other hand,
none of the articles about people named Finster reference this misspelling. Based on all this, I think F1NN5TER is the clear primary topic for the misspelling, and the
least astonishing approach for our readers would be to redirect to his article with hatnote to
Finster. --
Tamzin[
cetacean needed (
they|xe) 13:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
a notable topic X is commonly referred to as "Foo", but the article " Foo" is not about X. There's nothing in there about whether "Foo" is a misspelling or an alternative spelling—which in many cases is an artificial distinction. Here, I don't think it can be called an alternative spelling, because the correct spelling of a screen name can only be established by the person it refers to. And, on Twitter at least, the only time F1NN5TER has ever used this spelling is to complain about people searching for it more than his actual screen name.Alternatively, if this is really all about rcats, just remove the rcat entirely. There's no policy or guideline requirement to categorize redirects. -- Tamzin[ cetacean needed ( they|xe) 14:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirects from an an actor who doesn't have a page to a random tennis player Heyallkatehere ( talk) 08:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Bogus draft redirect. Vif12vf/Tiberius ( talk) 01:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Wikipedia:WikiProject Elections and Referenda/Overview of results
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Ownership of articles
I don't find this an implausible search term per se, but there are zero incoming links, 0 pageviews in the last 30 days, and this was created in November. Unneeded redirect. asilvering ( talk) 17:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to point this to WP:SUBSTANTIATE, somewhere less mildewy, because I always forget it's "SUBSTANTIATE", and keep wanting "most scholars" or "survey". Remsense 诉 17:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#France 2024
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Pappoos
The term "barphic" is not mentioned at the target article, nor is it mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Look of disapproval
A lot of this list is anything but common, an otherwise subjective and strange adjective to attach to a list, especially when "common" is not particularly definable as this can vary from person to person and community to community. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
"common" is not particularly definable. We might as well point readers who do search for such a list to the appropriate article. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 13:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Is not referred to as "Le Lenny Face" anywhere at the target article. The grammatical article of "le" obfuscates the search term and is as useful as attaching "the" to any subject (i.e. not that useful). Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia. Contains very crufty 2008 edits (all unsourced of course). Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
•^•
does not appear on the list, while :<
simply shows up under the entry for Frown. ( >:
is simply a backwards version of the latter.)
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (
talk) 22:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Keyboard faces
The target page is certainly not a list of emotions that you can experience online. Contains 4 edits worth of May 2008 history before evaporating into a redirect. Quite 2008 I'd say :v Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Kao maaku
No mention of "eastern" nor "eastern-style" emoticons that are named in this specific way at the target page. There is also no "Japanese style" section at the target page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
No mention of threads at the target article. Any emoji can be used in a thread, and is not automatically an emoticon. The refinement of Unicode is also not particularly specific to threads either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no mention of "Awesome face" at the target article, nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
The target page is not about Facial Expression Markup Language, and "markup language" does not occur anywhere in the body of the article. Perhaps in the past there used to be something here, but that does not seem to be the case anymore. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Colon Bracket
While a heart can definitely be formed as <3, this is still a general statement that does not apply to emoticons alone. It's pointed here for a while, yet there's also Less Than Three with different caps. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
The phrase "smiley code" is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia, and this page is certainly not a list of them. Has some 2005 cruft history to list the three primary emotions that humans can muster: Happy, Sad, and Money Smiley. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
"Smarticon" not mentioned at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
"Midget" is not mentioned anywhere at the page, much less "midget emoticon", which isn't mentioned anywhere. Contains one edit worth of 2005 cruft swiftly removed. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Facebook is not discussed at the target page; emoticons exist on all platforms regardless of the host, so there's nothing to be gained from a specific redirect here. (Does contain some very 2009-esque history though). Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Chalamius" at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Verticon
No mention of "Photocon" at the target page, nor anywhere else on Wikipedia. PhotoCON is a pretty safe retargeting option, but perhaps there's a reason for this redirect to exist that I'm not familiar with. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Epic Face" at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Japanese emotions are not purely "emoticons", even if some emoticons are Japanese. Misleading and unhelpful redirect, not discussed anywhere at the target page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Graemlin" at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Emotext
This redirect appears to be an attempt at a pun disguised as a typo implying the battle was somehow related to monocracy, which it was not. Delete. Mdewman6 ( talk) 01:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
This redirect might need a new target. Important because it is used in the {{ Asia topic}} navbar, its deletion will probably mean it will be re-created later down the road. Created in 2007, it has been targeted and retargeted during its history. It seems that a better target is needed. See also Template talk:Asia topic#Edit request 25 February 2024 for more info. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 05:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: RfD cannot order editors to create an article at a given title; such arguments are typically interpreted as a
WP:REDYES argument for deletion. Alternatively, disambiguation has been proposed but it's not entirely clear which articles would be listed on such a disambiguation page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rosguill's earlier relist comment still applies.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
asilvering (
talk) 00:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 13, 2024.
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21#EasyEnglish
> browsing wikipedia instead of having a life
> le funny shitpost greentext redirects have arrived
> chuckle to self
> realize that they're inevitably gonna get RFD'd and deleted at some point
> cry inside
> idea
> send them out in style befitting the shitposty nature of them
> smile
> remember that it's all meaningless and won't change the outcome anyway
> continue to cry inside whilst bemoaning my lack of a life
Anyway I suggest we delete these. 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 ( talk・ edits) 22:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21#Controversy over study buddies for international students in China
St. Stephen's School Rome is not known as "St. Stephen's International School". Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 20:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 22:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
<title>
of it is St. Stephen's International School | Welcome to St. Stephen's | St Stephen's School
- the school's still using 'St. Stephen's International School' within its branding and such, so I'd say the redirect does make sense.
🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (
talk・
edits) 23:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
This phrase is mentioned in the target article at Capitalism#Modernity, but not in a way that will probably satisfy anyone looking up at this phrase to locate a definition for this redirect. The phrasing of the redirect hints some sort of WP:REDYES potential. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 06:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 22:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Seems unclear what the target of these redirects should be. Honestly, I'm surprised that their target is not Company, though I guess an Economy could, in theory, create jobs as well. Hmm, even a Government can create jobs... Steel1943 ( talk) 21:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 06:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 22:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Since the subjects of these redirects probably refer to work done on a contract basis, I do not believe the current target or its section Employment#Independent contractor to be the best target for these redirects. From what I found, the best fit for these redirects is probably retarget to Employment contract. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
work done on a contract basisreferred to as "contract labor." - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 02:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 06:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Also notified of this discussion at the proposed target talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬 21:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Please delete. Redirect is circular when starting from target dab page; arguably squatting on article namespace and certainly matches RFD category 10. Bernanke's Crossbow ( talk) 21:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Power of Two
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 24#List of "Cops/COPS/C.O.P.S." episodes
I had originally targeted this to
F1NN5TER.
Wbm1058 has retargeted with the argument redirect to the more likely misspelling – only one extra letter is there, no digits
. I would agree with that if this were an arbitrary typo, but, as established in the prose of the article itself, this is a known misspelling of the subject's screen name—not borne of fat fingers, but people deliberately converting the
leetspeak canonical name to regular characters—even occurring in marginally reliable sources
like Game Rant. If you search Twitter for finnster
you'll see the misspelling is ubiquitous, with F1NN5TER being the subject of an outright majority of tweets containing the string. Googling the string—even Incognito, on public wifi, with before:2024
—the clear majority of hits I get are about F1NN5TER; the handful of exceptions are about non-notable animals and a one-off SNL character who had no lines. On the other hand,
none of the articles about people named Finster reference this misspelling. Based on all this, I think F1NN5TER is the clear primary topic for the misspelling, and the
least astonishing approach for our readers would be to redirect to his article with hatnote to
Finster. --
Tamzin[
cetacean needed (
they|xe) 13:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
a notable topic X is commonly referred to as "Foo", but the article " Foo" is not about X. There's nothing in there about whether "Foo" is a misspelling or an alternative spelling—which in many cases is an artificial distinction. Here, I don't think it can be called an alternative spelling, because the correct spelling of a screen name can only be established by the person it refers to. And, on Twitter at least, the only time F1NN5TER has ever used this spelling is to complain about people searching for it more than his actual screen name.Alternatively, if this is really all about rcats, just remove the rcat entirely. There's no policy or guideline requirement to categorize redirects. -- Tamzin[ cetacean needed ( they|xe) 14:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Redirects from an an actor who doesn't have a page to a random tennis player Heyallkatehere ( talk) 08:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 23:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit 11:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Bogus draft redirect. Vif12vf/Tiberius ( talk) 01:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Wikipedia:WikiProject Elections and Referenda/Overview of results
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Ownership of articles
I don't find this an implausible search term per se, but there are zero incoming links, 0 pageviews in the last 30 days, and this was created in November. Unneeded redirect. asilvering ( talk) 17:35, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to point this to WP:SUBSTANTIATE, somewhere less mildewy, because I always forget it's "SUBSTANTIATE", and keep wanting "most scholars" or "survey". Remsense 诉 17:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 07:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#France 2024
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Pappoos
The term "barphic" is not mentioned at the target article, nor is it mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Utopes ( talk / cont) 05:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Look of disapproval
A lot of this list is anything but common, an otherwise subjective and strange adjective to attach to a list, especially when "common" is not particularly definable as this can vary from person to person and community to community. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
"common" is not particularly definable. We might as well point readers who do search for such a list to the appropriate article. - Presidentman talk · contribs ( Talkback) 13:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Is not referred to as "Le Lenny Face" anywhere at the target article. The grammatical article of "le" obfuscates the search term and is as useful as attaching "the" to any subject (i.e. not that useful). Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Not mentioned at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia. Contains very crufty 2008 edits (all unsourced of course). Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
•^•
does not appear on the list, while :<
simply shows up under the entry for Frown. ( >:
is simply a backwards version of the latter.)
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (
talk) 22:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Keyboard faces
The target page is certainly not a list of emotions that you can experience online. Contains 4 edits worth of May 2008 history before evaporating into a redirect. Quite 2008 I'd say :v Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Kao maaku
No mention of "eastern" nor "eastern-style" emoticons that are named in this specific way at the target page. There is also no "Japanese style" section at the target page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
No mention of threads at the target article. Any emoji can be used in a thread, and is not automatically an emoticon. The refinement of Unicode is also not particularly specific to threads either. Utopes ( talk / cont) 04:04, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no mention of "Awesome face" at the target article, nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
The target page is not about Facial Expression Markup Language, and "markup language" does not occur anywhere in the body of the article. Perhaps in the past there used to be something here, but that does not seem to be the case anymore. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Colon Bracket
While a heart can definitely be formed as <3, this is still a general statement that does not apply to emoticons alone. It's pointed here for a while, yet there's also Less Than Three with different caps. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
The phrase "smiley code" is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia, and this page is certainly not a list of them. Has some 2005 cruft history to list the three primary emotions that humans can muster: Happy, Sad, and Money Smiley. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
"Smarticon" not mentioned at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
"Midget" is not mentioned anywhere at the page, much less "midget emoticon", which isn't mentioned anywhere. Contains one edit worth of 2005 cruft swiftly removed. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Facebook is not discussed at the target page; emoticons exist on all platforms regardless of the host, so there's nothing to be gained from a specific redirect here. (Does contain some very 2009-esque history though). Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Chalamius" at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Verticon
No mention of "Photocon" at the target page, nor anywhere else on Wikipedia. PhotoCON is a pretty safe retargeting option, but perhaps there's a reason for this redirect to exist that I'm not familiar with. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Epic Face" at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Japanese emotions are not purely "emoticons", even if some emoticons are Japanese. Misleading and unhelpful redirect, not discussed anywhere at the target page. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
No mention of "Graemlin" at the target page, nor anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Utopes ( talk / cont) 03:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20#Emotext
This redirect appears to be an attempt at a pun disguised as a typo implying the battle was somehow related to monocracy, which it was not. Delete. Mdewman6 ( talk) 01:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
This redirect might need a new target. Important because it is used in the {{ Asia topic}} navbar, its deletion will probably mean it will be re-created later down the road. Created in 2007, it has been targeted and retargeted during its history. It seems that a better target is needed. See also Template talk:Asia topic#Edit request 25 February 2024 for more info. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 05:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: RfD cannot order editors to create an article at a given title; such arguments are typically interpreted as a
WP:REDYES argument for deletion. Alternatively, disambiguation has been proposed but it's not entirely clear which articles would be listed on such a disambiguation page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Rosguill's earlier relist comment still applies.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
asilvering (
talk) 00:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)