This page lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.
Do not attempt to edit this list manually;
a bot will automatically update the page soon after the {{
subst:Requested move}} template is added to the discussion on the relevant talk page. The entry is removed automatically soon after the discussion is closed. To make a change to an entry, make the change on the linked talk page.
(
Discuss) – Tales of the Jedi (TV series) → Star Wars: Tales – Since this move made nearly three months ago has been objected to, here is an RM. I personally don't agree with the need as
consensus was reached on the matter. Never the less, this anthology series had its first installment released as (formally) Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi (commonly Tales of the Jedi) in October 2022, with it announced in April 2023 that
it would get a second season (wording used by media outlets, though the quote from Filoni was "Tales of the Jedi was so fun the first time, I decided to do some more.") Subsequently, it was announced a year later in April 2024 that this second "season" was a new "installment", Star Wars: Tales of the Empire (commonly Tales of the Empire).
This press release shows the use of both formal names as well as the key quote in my view (and the determination of the previous consensus) that Tales of the Empire was the second installment of the "Tales" series. Thus, an appropriate name to address this anthology series considering the formal name would be
Star Wars: Tales, which provides a
WP:NATURAL name. -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 17:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk) 17:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk)
05:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Trump administration migrant detentions →
Migrant detentions under the Trump administration – In my opinion, placing "Migrant detentions" first subtly ensures a neutral point of view by focusing on the broader issue of detentions of migrants, acknowledging that such practices have occurred under various administrations, not just during the Trump administration. This structure avoids implying sole responsibility while still providing clarity about the specfic time period being discussed..
Mooonswimmer01:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – João Neves (footballer) →
João Neves – The other person under this name is
João Neves (judoka). The difference in page views is staggering, and I believe there is a clear
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here. More likely than not, >99% of "João Neves" searches on the Internet and on Wikipedia are about the footballer, not the judoka, and the only reason the judoka has 783 page views this month is because of the disambiguation page through Wikipedia.
Paul Vaurie (
talk)
16:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – STEAM fields →
STEAM education – The Slate article cited in the first sentence states that STEAM is not just a collection of five fields, but a movement to integrate creative thinking and design skills into STEM education. And this is how much of the article describes it. But the first sentence defines it as a collection of five fields, and the presence of "fields" in the title reinforces that definition. I think the lede would be more consistent with the sources and with the rest of the article if we change the title to something like "STEAM education" or "STEAM movement" or just "STEAM", and change the first sentence to something like:
(
Discuss) – The Ecologists (coalition) → Ecologist Pole – Party was moved to the name
The Ecologists (and then
The Ecologists (coalition)) but no source was ever provided to say that there was a name change. The truth is that the coalition today has kind of faded (merged into first
NUPES then the
New Popular Front), but the
WP:COMMONNAME when it was still prominent was clearly "Ecologist Pole" (or "Pôle écologiste" in French). See
France Bleu,
La Croix,
Le Progrès, etc. The logo made for the primaries (see infobox) with the words "Les Écologistes" is just a logo, and does not necessarily mean that this ever was the coalition's official name. It's just that the party commonly known as
The Ecologists was the most prominent member of the coalition, and this name most likely gave the coalition the most visibility ahead of the primaries and the elections.
Paul Vaurie (
talk)
14:16, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Dongguk Tonggam →
Tongguk t'onggam – Per
WP:NCKO, this new target is the
McCune–Reischauer spelling. Searching in Google Scholar, "Tongguk t'onggam" gets 121 results and "Dongguk Tonggam" gets 33. Neither appear in Ngrams. I flipped through the results and sentence casing is more common; many style guidelines for East Asian studies recommend sentence casing for transliterated titles.
104.232.119.107 (
talk)
13:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – RADA → Royal Academy of Dramatic Art – Outside the United Kingdom, nobody really knows about RADA. Its certainly not a common name in comparison to
FIFA,
BBC and
NATO. Its a local English school, not a world wide organization. Both RADA and Royal Academy of Dramatic Art is used for it but, for the sake of non-British readers, the full term should be used.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
12:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Ascalon →
Ashkelon (ancient city) – Recently, the name of this article was changed from Tel Ashkelon to Ascalon. The rationale was that Ashkelon and Tel Ashkelon are too similar, and that readers cannot be expected to differentiate. It was said that Ascalon is the name of the historical site. This rationale is invalid. The name Ashkelon, is the conventionally accepted name for both the modern city, and the ancient site. In many cases, the name Ashkelon is even used when referring to periods in which it was historically known as Ascalon. This place has at least 20,000 years of history, accros many periods of times. It was a prehistoric site, a Canaanite, Philistine, Hellenistic city, a Crusader city, an Islamic city... We don't always know its actual name, and it has never had a single way to pronounce its name. I am suggesting to change the name to Ashkelon (ancient city). I divided my argument into three parts: (1) Ashkelon and Ascalon are virtually the same and therefore confusing; (2) The toponym for the ancient site is known in maps and sites as "Ashkelon"; (3) the conentional scholarly name for the city in all periods is "Ashkelon", including periods in which it was called in different names. 1. Ascalon and Ashkelon are virtually the same. It is very confusing still. Differetiating them with "ancient city" in brackets makes no mistakes. Another option would've been "Tel Ashkelon", but there were times in which the ancient settlements in Ashkelon were not exactly on the Tel, and the city often controlled a much broader territory. Tel Ashkelon would strictly refer to the antiquties, but the article's scope goes beyond it. Another opition I thought about was "History of Ashkelon", simmilar to how we have "
History of Athens", but I think that this might confuse the people who are looking for the history of modern Ashkelon, whose place should be in the article about the modern city. Therefore, I think that
Ashkelon (ancient city) is the clearest option for the scope of the article. 2. Location identification: Today, the principal site of ancient Ashkelon is known as Tel Ashkelon. This is a declared national park in Israel, and it apears by that name. The official name of the park is
"Ashkelon National Park". I think it makes a lot of sense to assume, that many people who visit Israel as tourist, will likely enter this Wikipedia article. They will not be referred to Ascalon, but to Ashkelon, either Tel Ashkelon (mentioned
here,
here,
here and
[2], which were the first results I was given by google. Therefore, the site, as a location, is better identified with Ashkelon rather than Ascalon
Bolter21(
talk to me)11:03, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Mike Johnson (Louisiana politician) → Mike Johnson – Johnson is the most prominent "Mike Johnson", as mentioned in previous discussions; nine months into his tenure, no serious attempt to replace him has emerged. A
page view analysis shows that no other Mike Johnson has even reached one thousand views since Johnson was elected speaker of the House in October, with the exception of
the Canadian ice hockey player, who received nearly 3,000 views on the day that Johnson was elected to the position. Against
Michael Johnsons, it is a similar situation, though Michael Johnson should remain a disambiguation page. It is clear a majority of users are looking for this Mike Johnson. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)03:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – 2024 CrowdStrike incident → ? – Two reasons: the first is that the lede of this article is straightforward; it instead say that there is an outrage, before saying how, where the title is derived from. Second, most reliable sources often refer this event as an outrage. The title should at least be moved to a title containing "outrage".
ToadetteEdit!16:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Not Strong Enough → Not Strong Enough (disambiguation) – The
pageviews show that the Boygenius song has not been exceeded in views by the Apocalyptica song. Additionally, the Apocalyptica song is of unclear
notability, as shown on its page, whereas the Boygenius song seems to be more notable. Seeing as there are only two topics, a disambiguation page might not even be needed, a hatnote could suffice. As a fan of the Boygenius song, I might be biased, but I still believe it is the primary topic. Courtesy pings to @
Ss112,
Dylan620,
Johnny421, and
HMDude3: as involved/top editors in these articles. – The Sharpest Lives (
💬•
✏️•
ℹ️) (
ping me!)
15:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Biscotti → Cantucci – this page (including the images) refers to "cantucci" (
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantuccio), not to "biscotti" (
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biscotto). Given that in Italy there are different types of biscotti, it's profoundly wrong to refer only to cantucci on a page with a name that includes all types of biscotti in Italy; if a group of non-Italians people go to Italy and ask for a biscotto, they don't just get cantucci. In conclusion, this page isn't very encyclopedic at the moment.
JacktheBrown (
talk)
06:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Names for books of Jewish and Christian scripture →
Names for Jewish and Christian holy books – This is a worthwhile article, but IMHO its current title is misleading. I expected "Names for books of Jewish and Christian scripture" to list the Jewish and Christian names for
books of the Bible. Instead, it lists divisions within the Bible, and the more authoritative of the other Jewish types of holy books. I believe that in both religions "scripture" is only used for the Bible. "
Sifrei Kodesh" is a wider category used in Judaism, literally meaning "holy books", although this does have a wider scope than the current content of the nominated article. –
FayenaticLondon 14:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Bensci54 (
talk) 16:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk)
23:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Tonlé Sap → Tonlé Sap Lake – The original name before renamed after the discussion
Talk:Tonlé_Sap#Rename above, due to possible confusion with the river that connect the lake and Mekong. The name "Tonlé Sap Lake" is NOT redundant at all. In that discussion user Markalexander100 stated that "Khmer and English terms aren't quite equivalent. In Khmer, as far as I can tell, there is one name- Tonle Sap- which refers to the lake and river together, while in English we differentiate them." This is not quite right because the official name of the lake in Khmer is "បឹងទន្លេសាប" (Boeng Tonle Sap), where បឹង/boeng means lake. So clearly they still have the word "lake" in the name, to differentiate it from the river. ទន្លេ/Tonle means river and that's its only meaning, not "Tonlé already means lake (or a very large, wide river)" as stated by user Dara above. For example,
Mekong is "Tonlé Mekong",
Bassac River is "Tonlé Bassac",
Kong River is "Tonlé Kong". There's no known translation as Tonlé to "lake". Another similarly named geographic feature is the
Boeng Tonle Chhmar (a smaller lake next to the Tonle Sap Lake). So to sum up, if we say "Tonle Sap" (without adding "Boeng") to the Khmer-speaking people, theoretically we are referring to the river (according to the meaning of the words). But then since the lake is too well-known, the term "Tonle Sap" will become ambiguous. However, as a matter of fact, they should be able to tell which one you are referring to, based on the context of the conversation. My suggestion is to rename this article to
Tonlé Sap Lake, and have a separate article about the river. Two options for this separate article's name is: #
Tonlé Sap (as per its literal meaning in Khmer) or, #
Tonlé Sap (river) and
Tonlé Sap becomes the disambiguation page. The reason for having a separate article for the river is simply because not everything about the river can be merged into the lake's article. For example,
Phnom Penh, the state's capital, is located at the mouth of the river and there's probably something about the river related to Phnom Penh's urban planning that's worth writing about. And merging these into the lake's article would be inappropriate.
ទន្លេតូច (
talk) 23:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk)
22:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Main Development Region → Main development region –
Using sentence case was suggested by at least two people in the recently closed RM, and three more people used sentence case in their comments. No one explicitly objected to using sentence case, but that question was not discussed very extensively. This new RM is to explicitly consider the capitalization. The Google scholar results above and
Ngrams show mixed case usage. When usage is mixed, Wikipedia prefers lowercase. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
13:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Nushki District →
Noshki District – There seem to be conflicting sources on the name of the district; some sources will use Noshki, renamed from Noshkay, while others will use Nushki. Noshki, from what I can find, seems to be both the more common among reliable sources, and also the correct name. If consensus can be found to move this page, I'll also be renaming related pages
Nushki and
Nushki shooting, as they'd be renamed for the same reason.
SmittenGalaxy|talk! 06:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Quadrantal (
talk)
07:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – The Sun → The Sun (disambiguation) – I know, I know, the last discussion on this exact topic closed with consensus against. But the policy on the matter is clear, and the last discussion barely touched that policy at all.
WP:PTOPIC says, first, that A topic is primary for a term with respect to usage if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term. With
the wikinav entry showing that 2/3rds of people who visit the page are looking for
Sun, that criterion seems to be met. You can argue that 2/3rds isn't high enough, but it's twice as likely than every other candidate combined. PTOPIC also says that A topic is primary for a term with respect to long-term significance if it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term. With all due respect to the newspapers, the
Sun meets that criteria with flying colors. I don't see how it could be argued that the thing that sustains all known life doesn't have substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than a couple of moderate-to-large companies. This seems like a pretty clear-cut case to me.
theleekycauldron (
talk • she/her)
02:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)reply
July 17, 2024
(
Discuss) – Covanta →
Reworld – Covanta was renamed to Reworld
back in April. Since then, most people have been using the new name. This is not a controversial move, but I'm using this tool to request a move on account of my COI - I work for the article-subject. I'd also like to suggest a redirect from Covanta to the new Reworld title, replacing "Covanta" with "Reworld" throughout, and adding a "(previously known as Covanta)" at the beginning.
NKR2009 (
talk) 16:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!23:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Vespina (aircraft) →
Airbus Voyager ZZ336 – I am a close watcher of aviation generally and military aviation specifically, and I had no idea what this article title referred to.
WP:AT states that when article titles have multiple possibilities, "editors choose among them by considering several principles: the ideal article title precisely identifies the subject; it is short, natural, distinguishable and recognizable; and resembles titles for similar articles." None of those are true to "Vespina (aircraft). Being strictly factual and naming it as <Aircraft (i.e. general type name)> <Registration (denoting specific aircraft> is much clearer. The current name is vague in the extreme.
Mark83 (
talk) 08:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Quadrantal (
talk)
16:04, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Sněžka → Śnieżka – The mountain, located on the border between Poland and the Czech Republic, is widely recognized by its Polish name, "Śnieżka", in international contexts. The usage of this name aligns with global recognition and common usage in various languages, including English. Śnieżka is the highest peak in the Karkonosze Mountains and a prominent feature in both Poland and the Czech Republic. Given its location and significance, using the Polish name honors its geographical and cultural importance within Poland. Wikipedia’s naming conventions emphasize using the most common name in English, and "Śnieżka" is frequently used in English-language texts and references. This change would thus enhance consistency and recognizability for English-speaking users. Other geographical features with dual names often default to the version that holds the most international recognition. Renaming the article to "Śnieżka" follows this precedent and ensures coherence across Wikipedia entries.
Paradygmaty (
talk)
09:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – British support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war → United Kingdom and the Israel–Hamas war – Not only match two other articles, Qatar and the United States about their role in this war, but a word like "support" isn't neutral even if the UK policy is to support Israel in this conflict. The article does make mention of opposition to the government support for Israel, therefore this isn't solely about support for Israel. The title should be reflected in a more precise manner than an outright position of support or opposition in the title.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Adumbrativus (
talk)
08:02, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Chinese people → ? – I think this article should be moved to another title, possibly something like 'Chinese people (national)', and then the current title redirected to the '
Chinese' disambiguation page, because 'Chinese people' could equally refer to this article and to the '
Han Chinese' ethnic group.
PK2 (
talk;
contributions)
06:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Nusantara → Nusantara (disambiguation) – When this move was nominated a year ago, the primary reason against such move was that it was too soon with the city then only in its planning stages along with doubts whether or not the city would even be completed. Now, in about a month the city would become the new capital of Indonesia, which I argue would make it the primary topic. The city also gets significantly more views than other topics with such name.
Zinderboff(
talk)
16:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Eights Week → Summer Eights – While referred to as Eights Week in the past, the event is far more commonly known as Summer Eights today. All University, College, and town publication, including all material from the actual organisers refers to the event as 'Summer Eights', not 'Eights Week'. Additionally, as referred to by the last move request back in 2016, there are far more common results for Summer Eights than Eights Week in search engines. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.
OxfordRowing (
talk)
20:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – CONMEBOL–UEFA Cup of Champions → Finalissima – I do not understand how the December move request was opposed. Per
Wikipedia:Article titles, the title should be recognizable, concise, natural, precise, and consistent. The majority of the sources in the article uses Finalissima or Artemio Franchi Cup (which I hope we can agree is an outdated name), and very little refer to it as the "CONMEBOL–UEFA Cup of Champions". In fact source 1 of the article states that the "Cup of Champions" refers to the trophy and "Finalissima" is the tournament. Even a Google search of "CONMEBOL–UEFA Cup of Champions" gives you results on the
UEFA Cup Winners' Cup and
European Rugby Champions Cup with ESPN the only major site that (outside of Wikipedia) that returns this tournament. Google "Finalissima" on the otherhand and it returns results for this tournament from sites such as Sky Sports, BBC, The Guardian, and most importantly UEFA. The women's and fustal version of the tournament have been named "Finalissima". So why isn't the men's if article naming is supposed to be consistent?
Mn1548 (
talk)
08:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Francis, Duke of Guise → François, Duke of Guise – This is my second attempt at this move request. The first was closed to no-consensus with a 3 support 2 oppose back in March. I am going to attempt to address some of the criticisms of the move raised in that move request and just more fully flesh out the reason this article should be moved. As before the grounds for the move are
WP:COMMONNAME. In this ngram you will see a comparison of the relative popularities of Henri de Guise, Henry de Guise, François de Lorraine and Francis de Lorraine
[19] Ngrams are not my favourite method of determining popularity as they tend to be crowded by noise, therefore I will primarily be using google scholar results, restricted to results in English publications since 2000 for a better understanding of the modern usage. Francis of Guise = 53 results Francis of Lorraine = 199 results Francis de Guise = 7 results Francis de Lorraine = 6 results Francis, Duke of Guise = 98 results Francis, Duke de Guise = 1 result Francis, duc of Guise = 0 results Francis, duc de Guise = 4 results Francis of Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 9 results Francis of Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results Francis of Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Francis of Lorraine, duc de Guise = 0 results Francis de Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 1 result Francis de Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 1 result Francis de Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Francis de Lorraine, duc de Guise = 0 results Total for Francis = 379 (give or take, there will be some noise in Francis of Lorraine/Henry of Lorraine and François de Lorraine/Henri de Lorraine due to other people of the same name) François of Guise = 11 results François of Lorraine = 20 results François de Guise = 230 results François de Lorraine = 210 results François, Duke of Guise = 76 results François, Duke de Guise = 5 results François, duc of Guise = 0 results François, duc de Guise = 83 results François of Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 1 results François of Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results François of Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results François of Lorraine, duc de Guise = 3 results François de Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 18 results François de Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results François de Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results François de Lorraine, duc de Guise = 59 results Total for François = 716 (same disclaimed as above for Francis). 716 vs 379: a decisive majority of scholarly usage for the name François. Henry of Guise = 105 results Henry of Lorraine = 52 results Henry de Guise = 31 results Henry de Lorraine = 24 results Henry, Duke of Guise = 115 results Henry, Duke de Guise = 6 results Henry, duc of Guise = 0 results Henry, duc de Guise = 13 results Henry of Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 11 results Henry of Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 1 result Henry of Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Henry of Lorraine, duc de Guise = 0 results Henry de Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 2 results Henry de Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results Henry de Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Henry de Lorraine, duc de Guise = 3 results Total for Henry = 363. Henri of Guise = 23 results Henri of Lorraine = 21 results Henri de Guise = 225 results Henri de Lorraine = 129 results Henri, Duke of Guise = 64 results Henri, Duke de Guise = 2 results Henri, duc of Guise = 0 results Henri, duc de Guise = 87 results Henri of Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 2 results Henri of Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results Henri of Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Henri of Lorraine, duc de Guise = 1 result Henri de Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 7 results Henri de Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results Henri de Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Henri de Lorraine, duc de Guise = 27 results Total for Henri = 588. 588 vs 363 another decisive margin. The google scholar searches for Henri function as evidence for both Henry/Henri I, and Henry/Henri II, as using the numerals would massively depreciate the numbers returned. In addressing the point raised by Srnec in the prior move, we have a majority in English scholarship for the names François and Henri, we do not have a majority for duc de Guise over duke of Guise for the article title (131 duc vs 209 duke for Henri and 149 duc vs 205 duke for François). Beyond the statistical evidence in support of its common usage, I would like to also draw on particular scholarship as I did for my first move request. This will be based on English language scholarship covering the periods of the Italian Wars and the French Wars of Religion covering the life span of François and Henri I, I have less specific scholarship examples for Henri II, however he is covered in a couple of these and the statistical evidence. The first and most important work is the recent (2011) biography of the Guise family 'Martyrs and Murderers: the Guise family and the making of Europe' written by the historian Stuart Carroll. This biography refers to the dukes as follows: François, Henri, Henri. There is also the recent work by the historian Mark Konnert in which they are a title feature (Local Politics in the French Wars of Religion: The Towns of Champagne, the duc de Guise and the Catholic League (1560-1595)) which likewise uses François and Henri. I will include the survey of academic English literature I included in my first move request, with slight additions for academics I have since become aware of. Gould [history of the French Wars of Religion in the south of the kingdom] (2006) = François; Roelker [biography of Jeanne d'Albret] (1968) = François, Henri; Knecht [biography of Catherine de' Medici] (2014) = François, Henri; Diefendorf [history of Paris in the prelude to the St Bartholomew's Day Massacre] (1991) = François, Henri; Roberts [history of the peace making efforts during the wars] (2013) = François, Henri; Sutherland [history of the secretaries of state in the era of Catherine] (1962) = François, Henri; Tullchin (2012) = François, Henri;; Baumgartner (1986) = Henri; Harding (1978) = François, Henri; Heller (2003) = Henri; Potter (1997) = François, Henri; Carroll (2005) = François, Henri; Bernstein (2004) = Henri; Konnert (1997) = François, Henri; Benedict (2003) = François, Henri; Salmon [introduction to French sixteenth century history] (1979) = François, Henri; Shaw (2019) [only English language survey of the Italian Wars] = François; Pitts [biography of Henri IV of France] (2012) = François, Henri; Neuschel (1989) = François; Kingdon (1967) = François, Henri; Greengrass (1988) = François; Conner (2000) = François; Spangler [chief historian of the Guise family in the 17th century, i.e. Henri II] (2016) = Henri, Heap (2019) = François, Henri. Tingle [history of Nantes during the French Wars of Religion] (2006) is a little unusual, refers to François, and Henry; likewise Shimizu [dissertation on Gaspard de Coligny] (1970) refers to Francis, and Henri Holt [biography of the duc d'Anjou] (2002) = Francis, Henry, he is the only French Wars of Religion era academic I am aware of who throughout all his works consistently calls them this way. Wood [military history of the early French Wars of Religion] (2002) never refers to either duke by their first name In some of the above I have detailed the nature of the book in square brackets to indicate the mixture of popular biographies, introductory surveys and more focused studies of various institutions and regions that build this picture. In addition to my common move argument, it is also of note that the article for the seventh duke of Guise is at
François Joseph, Duke of Guise so the present state of affairs in addition to violating common usage, also creates a weird discordance in the line of dukes.
sovietblobfish (
talk)
15:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Lady Henry Somerset → Lady Isabella Somerset – As mentioned in the article, this person "won the court case in 1878 and resumed the style of Lady Isabella Somerset", and after 1878 she used "Lady Isabella Somerset" as her official style. Because of this name change,
the article title of this person in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography is "Somerset [née Somers-Cocks], Lady Isabella Caroline [Lady Henry Somerset]", and the ODNB calls her "Lady Isabella" in the article. The British Museum also registers her as "
Lady Isabella Somerset". There is also an academic article which calls her "
Lady Isabella Somerset". According to
Wikipedia:Article_titles#Name_changes, "When this [a change of name] occurs, we give extra weight to independent, reliable, English-language sources ("reliable sources" for short) written after the name change". Since this person is called "Lady Isabella Somerset" in recent reliable sources, the name of the article should be "Lady Isabella Somerset". The move was already proposed in 2017, but it was not performed.
saebou (
talk)
08:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.
Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.
(
Discuss) – 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel → 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel – I believe that enough time has passed since the last RM (which proposed the simpler "7 October attacks" name and closed with consensus to retain the current title) to re-propose a title change for this article. I believe that "7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel" is the
WP:COMMONNAME for this event, as seen in sources such as: *
Al Jazeera: "... counter the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which saw ..." *
Bloomberg: "... trapped in Gaza since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which prompted ..." *
CBC: "... around the world since the Hamas-led attacks on Israel of Oct. 7 but are now ..." *
CNN: "... from the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel being held ..." *
Euracitiv: "... triggered by the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel in which ..." *
France24: "Before the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that triggered ..." *
ISW: "... spokesperson claimed that the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel was retaliation ..." *
Middle East Eye: "Following the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel and subsequent ..." *
NPR: "... Palestinian armed groups since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that set off the war ..." *
NYTimes: "... including some who participated in the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, and that ..." *
Reuters: "... were involved in the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that precipitated ..." *
Times of Israel: "... during and after the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel." *
The Conversation: "... participated in the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which resulted ... " *
WaPo: "Since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, restrictions have ..." Many sources simply say "7 October" or "October 7 attacks" instead of spelling out the full name, but I believe that while "7 October attacks" could be a more COMMON name, I think that it fails
WP:AT#Precision in favor of "7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel."
DecafPotato (
talk) 00:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. —
Amakuru (
talk)
14:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – De La Salle Green Spikers volleyball →
De La Salle Green Archers volleyball – The above existing pages have titles that do emulate the placement of a disambiguating sports descriptor after the team name, per
WP:QUALIFIER. This style of adding descriptors has been prescribed by example by, among other similar college-sports WikiProjects,
this page under
WP:CBBALL and
this page under
WP:CFB for titles of pages about United States college teams. Clearly, these descriptors were prescribed in order to naturally disambiguate (by
WP:NATURAL) a page about a team playing a certain sport from pages about namesake teams that are playing in other sports. In each of the team pages above being requested for moving, however, 1) the team name used is not that of its institution's team's uniform or collective name but the special nickname or unique moniker given to that specific team playing in its sport, so much so that the need for disambiguation disappears. 2) what is produced by the addition of a disambiguating sport descriptor after the team's special nickname is a redundancy. For example, there are no other De La Salle Green Spikers other than the De La Salle Green Archers team playing men's volleyball. For having a redundant title, the page's title then creates
WP:OVERPRECISION and breaches the
WP:CONCISE rule. That, however, can be salvaged by replacing the special moniker with the institution's team's uniform or collective name, a replacement which is what would have the need for disambiguation and erase the redundancy.
Bagoto (
talk) 09:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk)
18:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Sexual and gender-based violence in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel → Sexual violence in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel – Gender-based violence is defined as "any type of harm that is perpetrated against a person or group of people because of their factual or perceived sex, gender, sexual orientation and/or gender identity".[1] It is not currently clear that this article deals with any such violence other than that of a sexual nature, and even then, the lede states that male Israelis were also subjected to sexual violence (which if true suggests that it was not gender-based). A previous discussion on this topic has also shown that many people do not understand what the term "gender-based violence" actually means, so whether including it in the title is usefully descriptive is quite questionable.
(
Discuss) – Srebrenica massacre → Srebrenica genocide – I suggest that we rename this article to "Srebrenica genocide" now that the UN has issued its resolution on the matter today, designating July 11 as the International Day of Reflection and Commemoration of the 1995 Genocide in Srebrenica Please also check the discussion above.
Njamu (
talk) 06:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk)
09:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – 2024 Nuseirat rescue operation →
Nuseirat raid and rescue – Most sources are dual referencing this as a raid, attack or assault rather than just as a rescue.
Guardian "Israeli attacks in central Gaza killed scores of Palestinians, many of them civilians, on Saturday amid a special forces operation to free four hostages held there, with the death toll sparking international outrage."
NYT "Israeli soldiers and special operations police rescued four hostages from Gaza on Saturday amid a heavy air and ground assault",
CNN "Israel’s operation to rescue four hostages took weeks of preparation and involved hundreds of personnel, its military said. But the mission began with a trail of destruction in central Gaza and ended in carnage, according to local authorities."
Selfstudier (
talk)
15:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
This page lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.
Do not attempt to edit this list manually;
a bot will automatically update the page soon after the {{
subst:Requested move}} template is added to the discussion on the relevant talk page. The entry is removed automatically soon after the discussion is closed. To make a change to an entry, make the change on the linked talk page.
(
Discuss) – Tales of the Jedi (TV series) → Star Wars: Tales – Since this move made nearly three months ago has been objected to, here is an RM. I personally don't agree with the need as
consensus was reached on the matter. Never the less, this anthology series had its first installment released as (formally) Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi (commonly Tales of the Jedi) in October 2022, with it announced in April 2023 that
it would get a second season (wording used by media outlets, though the quote from Filoni was "Tales of the Jedi was so fun the first time, I decided to do some more.") Subsequently, it was announced a year later in April 2024 that this second "season" was a new "installment", Star Wars: Tales of the Empire (commonly Tales of the Empire).
This press release shows the use of both formal names as well as the key quote in my view (and the determination of the previous consensus) that Tales of the Empire was the second installment of the "Tales" series. Thus, an appropriate name to address this anthology series considering the formal name would be
Star Wars: Tales, which provides a
WP:NATURAL name. -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 17:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk) 17:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk)
05:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Trump administration migrant detentions →
Migrant detentions under the Trump administration – In my opinion, placing "Migrant detentions" first subtly ensures a neutral point of view by focusing on the broader issue of detentions of migrants, acknowledging that such practices have occurred under various administrations, not just during the Trump administration. This structure avoids implying sole responsibility while still providing clarity about the specfic time period being discussed..
Mooonswimmer01:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – João Neves (footballer) →
João Neves – The other person under this name is
João Neves (judoka). The difference in page views is staggering, and I believe there is a clear
WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here. More likely than not, >99% of "João Neves" searches on the Internet and on Wikipedia are about the footballer, not the judoka, and the only reason the judoka has 783 page views this month is because of the disambiguation page through Wikipedia.
Paul Vaurie (
talk)
16:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – STEAM fields →
STEAM education – The Slate article cited in the first sentence states that STEAM is not just a collection of five fields, but a movement to integrate creative thinking and design skills into STEM education. And this is how much of the article describes it. But the first sentence defines it as a collection of five fields, and the presence of "fields" in the title reinforces that definition. I think the lede would be more consistent with the sources and with the rest of the article if we change the title to something like "STEAM education" or "STEAM movement" or just "STEAM", and change the first sentence to something like:
(
Discuss) – The Ecologists (coalition) → Ecologist Pole – Party was moved to the name
The Ecologists (and then
The Ecologists (coalition)) but no source was ever provided to say that there was a name change. The truth is that the coalition today has kind of faded (merged into first
NUPES then the
New Popular Front), but the
WP:COMMONNAME when it was still prominent was clearly "Ecologist Pole" (or "Pôle écologiste" in French). See
France Bleu,
La Croix,
Le Progrès, etc. The logo made for the primaries (see infobox) with the words "Les Écologistes" is just a logo, and does not necessarily mean that this ever was the coalition's official name. It's just that the party commonly known as
The Ecologists was the most prominent member of the coalition, and this name most likely gave the coalition the most visibility ahead of the primaries and the elections.
Paul Vaurie (
talk)
14:16, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Dongguk Tonggam →
Tongguk t'onggam – Per
WP:NCKO, this new target is the
McCune–Reischauer spelling. Searching in Google Scholar, "Tongguk t'onggam" gets 121 results and "Dongguk Tonggam" gets 33. Neither appear in Ngrams. I flipped through the results and sentence casing is more common; many style guidelines for East Asian studies recommend sentence casing for transliterated titles.
104.232.119.107 (
talk)
13:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – RADA → Royal Academy of Dramatic Art – Outside the United Kingdom, nobody really knows about RADA. Its certainly not a common name in comparison to
FIFA,
BBC and
NATO. Its a local English school, not a world wide organization. Both RADA and Royal Academy of Dramatic Art is used for it but, for the sake of non-British readers, the full term should be used.
Omnis Scientia (
talk)
12:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Ascalon →
Ashkelon (ancient city) – Recently, the name of this article was changed from Tel Ashkelon to Ascalon. The rationale was that Ashkelon and Tel Ashkelon are too similar, and that readers cannot be expected to differentiate. It was said that Ascalon is the name of the historical site. This rationale is invalid. The name Ashkelon, is the conventionally accepted name for both the modern city, and the ancient site. In many cases, the name Ashkelon is even used when referring to periods in which it was historically known as Ascalon. This place has at least 20,000 years of history, accros many periods of times. It was a prehistoric site, a Canaanite, Philistine, Hellenistic city, a Crusader city, an Islamic city... We don't always know its actual name, and it has never had a single way to pronounce its name. I am suggesting to change the name to Ashkelon (ancient city). I divided my argument into three parts: (1) Ashkelon and Ascalon are virtually the same and therefore confusing; (2) The toponym for the ancient site is known in maps and sites as "Ashkelon"; (3) the conentional scholarly name for the city in all periods is "Ashkelon", including periods in which it was called in different names. 1. Ascalon and Ashkelon are virtually the same. It is very confusing still. Differetiating them with "ancient city" in brackets makes no mistakes. Another option would've been "Tel Ashkelon", but there were times in which the ancient settlements in Ashkelon were not exactly on the Tel, and the city often controlled a much broader territory. Tel Ashkelon would strictly refer to the antiquties, but the article's scope goes beyond it. Another opition I thought about was "History of Ashkelon", simmilar to how we have "
History of Athens", but I think that this might confuse the people who are looking for the history of modern Ashkelon, whose place should be in the article about the modern city. Therefore, I think that
Ashkelon (ancient city) is the clearest option for the scope of the article. 2. Location identification: Today, the principal site of ancient Ashkelon is known as Tel Ashkelon. This is a declared national park in Israel, and it apears by that name. The official name of the park is
"Ashkelon National Park". I think it makes a lot of sense to assume, that many people who visit Israel as tourist, will likely enter this Wikipedia article. They will not be referred to Ascalon, but to Ashkelon, either Tel Ashkelon (mentioned
here,
here,
here and
[2], which were the first results I was given by google. Therefore, the site, as a location, is better identified with Ashkelon rather than Ascalon
Bolter21(
talk to me)11:03, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Mike Johnson (Louisiana politician) → Mike Johnson – Johnson is the most prominent "Mike Johnson", as mentioned in previous discussions; nine months into his tenure, no serious attempt to replace him has emerged. A
page view analysis shows that no other Mike Johnson has even reached one thousand views since Johnson was elected speaker of the House in October, with the exception of
the Canadian ice hockey player, who received nearly 3,000 views on the day that Johnson was elected to the position. Against
Michael Johnsons, it is a similar situation, though Michael Johnson should remain a disambiguation page. It is clear a majority of users are looking for this Mike Johnson. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)03:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – 2024 CrowdStrike incident → ? – Two reasons: the first is that the lede of this article is straightforward; it instead say that there is an outrage, before saying how, where the title is derived from. Second, most reliable sources often refer this event as an outrage. The title should at least be moved to a title containing "outrage".
ToadetteEdit!16:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Not Strong Enough → Not Strong Enough (disambiguation) – The
pageviews show that the Boygenius song has not been exceeded in views by the Apocalyptica song. Additionally, the Apocalyptica song is of unclear
notability, as shown on its page, whereas the Boygenius song seems to be more notable. Seeing as there are only two topics, a disambiguation page might not even be needed, a hatnote could suffice. As a fan of the Boygenius song, I might be biased, but I still believe it is the primary topic. Courtesy pings to @
Ss112,
Dylan620,
Johnny421, and
HMDude3: as involved/top editors in these articles. – The Sharpest Lives (
💬•
✏️•
ℹ️) (
ping me!)
15:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Biscotti → Cantucci – this page (including the images) refers to "cantucci" (
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantuccio), not to "biscotti" (
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biscotto). Given that in Italy there are different types of biscotti, it's profoundly wrong to refer only to cantucci on a page with a name that includes all types of biscotti in Italy; if a group of non-Italians people go to Italy and ask for a biscotto, they don't just get cantucci. In conclusion, this page isn't very encyclopedic at the moment.
JacktheBrown (
talk)
06:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Names for books of Jewish and Christian scripture →
Names for Jewish and Christian holy books – This is a worthwhile article, but IMHO its current title is misleading. I expected "Names for books of Jewish and Christian scripture" to list the Jewish and Christian names for
books of the Bible. Instead, it lists divisions within the Bible, and the more authoritative of the other Jewish types of holy books. I believe that in both religions "scripture" is only used for the Bible. "
Sifrei Kodesh" is a wider category used in Judaism, literally meaning "holy books", although this does have a wider scope than the current content of the nominated article. –
FayenaticLondon 14:51, 1 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Bensci54 (
talk) 16:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk)
23:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Tonlé Sap → Tonlé Sap Lake – The original name before renamed after the discussion
Talk:Tonlé_Sap#Rename above, due to possible confusion with the river that connect the lake and Mekong. The name "Tonlé Sap Lake" is NOT redundant at all. In that discussion user Markalexander100 stated that "Khmer and English terms aren't quite equivalent. In Khmer, as far as I can tell, there is one name- Tonle Sap- which refers to the lake and river together, while in English we differentiate them." This is not quite right because the official name of the lake in Khmer is "បឹងទន្លេសាប" (Boeng Tonle Sap), where បឹង/boeng means lake. So clearly they still have the word "lake" in the name, to differentiate it from the river. ទន្លេ/Tonle means river and that's its only meaning, not "Tonlé already means lake (or a very large, wide river)" as stated by user Dara above. For example,
Mekong is "Tonlé Mekong",
Bassac River is "Tonlé Bassac",
Kong River is "Tonlé Kong". There's no known translation as Tonlé to "lake". Another similarly named geographic feature is the
Boeng Tonle Chhmar (a smaller lake next to the Tonle Sap Lake). So to sum up, if we say "Tonle Sap" (without adding "Boeng") to the Khmer-speaking people, theoretically we are referring to the river (according to the meaning of the words). But then since the lake is too well-known, the term "Tonle Sap" will become ambiguous. However, as a matter of fact, they should be able to tell which one you are referring to, based on the context of the conversation. My suggestion is to rename this article to
Tonlé Sap Lake, and have a separate article about the river. Two options for this separate article's name is: #
Tonlé Sap (as per its literal meaning in Khmer) or, #
Tonlé Sap (river) and
Tonlé Sap becomes the disambiguation page. The reason for having a separate article for the river is simply because not everything about the river can be merged into the lake's article. For example,
Phnom Penh, the state's capital, is located at the mouth of the river and there's probably something about the river related to Phnom Penh's urban planning that's worth writing about. And merging these into the lake's article would be inappropriate.
ទន្លេតូច (
talk) 23:27, 10 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk)
22:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Main Development Region → Main development region –
Using sentence case was suggested by at least two people in the recently closed RM, and three more people used sentence case in their comments. No one explicitly objected to using sentence case, but that question was not discussed very extensively. This new RM is to explicitly consider the capitalization. The Google scholar results above and
Ngrams show mixed case usage. When usage is mixed, Wikipedia prefers lowercase. —
BarrelProof (
talk)
13:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Nushki District →
Noshki District – There seem to be conflicting sources on the name of the district; some sources will use Noshki, renamed from Noshkay, while others will use Nushki. Noshki, from what I can find, seems to be both the more common among reliable sources, and also the correct name. If consensus can be found to move this page, I'll also be renaming related pages
Nushki and
Nushki shooting, as they'd be renamed for the same reason.
SmittenGalaxy|talk! 06:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Quadrantal (
talk)
07:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – The Sun → The Sun (disambiguation) – I know, I know, the last discussion on this exact topic closed with consensus against. But the policy on the matter is clear, and the last discussion barely touched that policy at all.
WP:PTOPIC says, first, that A topic is primary for a term with respect to usage if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term. With
the wikinav entry showing that 2/3rds of people who visit the page are looking for
Sun, that criterion seems to be met. You can argue that 2/3rds isn't high enough, but it's twice as likely than every other candidate combined. PTOPIC also says that A topic is primary for a term with respect to long-term significance if it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term. With all due respect to the newspapers, the
Sun meets that criteria with flying colors. I don't see how it could be argued that the thing that sustains all known life doesn't have substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than a couple of moderate-to-large companies. This seems like a pretty clear-cut case to me.
theleekycauldron (
talk • she/her)
02:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)reply
July 17, 2024
(
Discuss) – Covanta →
Reworld – Covanta was renamed to Reworld
back in April. Since then, most people have been using the new name. This is not a controversial move, but I'm using this tool to request a move on account of my COI - I work for the article-subject. I'd also like to suggest a redirect from Covanta to the new Reworld title, replacing "Covanta" with "Reworld" throughout, and adding a "(previously known as Covanta)" at the beginning.
NKR2009 (
talk) 16:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!23:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Vespina (aircraft) →
Airbus Voyager ZZ336 – I am a close watcher of aviation generally and military aviation specifically, and I had no idea what this article title referred to.
WP:AT states that when article titles have multiple possibilities, "editors choose among them by considering several principles: the ideal article title precisely identifies the subject; it is short, natural, distinguishable and recognizable; and resembles titles for similar articles." None of those are true to "Vespina (aircraft). Being strictly factual and naming it as <Aircraft (i.e. general type name)> <Registration (denoting specific aircraft> is much clearer. The current name is vague in the extreme.
Mark83 (
talk) 08:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Quadrantal (
talk)
16:04, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Sněžka → Śnieżka – The mountain, located on the border between Poland and the Czech Republic, is widely recognized by its Polish name, "Śnieżka", in international contexts. The usage of this name aligns with global recognition and common usage in various languages, including English. Śnieżka is the highest peak in the Karkonosze Mountains and a prominent feature in both Poland and the Czech Republic. Given its location and significance, using the Polish name honors its geographical and cultural importance within Poland. Wikipedia’s naming conventions emphasize using the most common name in English, and "Śnieżka" is frequently used in English-language texts and references. This change would thus enhance consistency and recognizability for English-speaking users. Other geographical features with dual names often default to the version that holds the most international recognition. Renaming the article to "Śnieżka" follows this precedent and ensures coherence across Wikipedia entries.
Paradygmaty (
talk)
09:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – British support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war → United Kingdom and the Israel–Hamas war – Not only match two other articles, Qatar and the United States about their role in this war, but a word like "support" isn't neutral even if the UK policy is to support Israel in this conflict. The article does make mention of opposition to the government support for Israel, therefore this isn't solely about support for Israel. The title should be reflected in a more precise manner than an outright position of support or opposition in the title.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 22:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.Adumbrativus (
talk)
08:02, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Chinese people → ? – I think this article should be moved to another title, possibly something like 'Chinese people (national)', and then the current title redirected to the '
Chinese' disambiguation page, because 'Chinese people' could equally refer to this article and to the '
Han Chinese' ethnic group.
PK2 (
talk;
contributions)
06:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Nusantara → Nusantara (disambiguation) – When this move was nominated a year ago, the primary reason against such move was that it was too soon with the city then only in its planning stages along with doubts whether or not the city would even be completed. Now, in about a month the city would become the new capital of Indonesia, which I argue would make it the primary topic. The city also gets significantly more views than other topics with such name.
Zinderboff(
talk)
16:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Eights Week → Summer Eights – While referred to as Eights Week in the past, the event is far more commonly known as Summer Eights today. All University, College, and town publication, including all material from the actual organisers refers to the event as 'Summer Eights', not 'Eights Week'. Additionally, as referred to by the last move request back in 2016, there are far more common results for Summer Eights than Eights Week in search engines. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.
OxfordRowing (
talk)
20:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – CONMEBOL–UEFA Cup of Champions → Finalissima – I do not understand how the December move request was opposed. Per
Wikipedia:Article titles, the title should be recognizable, concise, natural, precise, and consistent. The majority of the sources in the article uses Finalissima or Artemio Franchi Cup (which I hope we can agree is an outdated name), and very little refer to it as the "CONMEBOL–UEFA Cup of Champions". In fact source 1 of the article states that the "Cup of Champions" refers to the trophy and "Finalissima" is the tournament. Even a Google search of "CONMEBOL–UEFA Cup of Champions" gives you results on the
UEFA Cup Winners' Cup and
European Rugby Champions Cup with ESPN the only major site that (outside of Wikipedia) that returns this tournament. Google "Finalissima" on the otherhand and it returns results for this tournament from sites such as Sky Sports, BBC, The Guardian, and most importantly UEFA. The women's and fustal version of the tournament have been named "Finalissima". So why isn't the men's if article naming is supposed to be consistent?
Mn1548 (
talk)
08:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Francis, Duke of Guise → François, Duke of Guise – This is my second attempt at this move request. The first was closed to no-consensus with a 3 support 2 oppose back in March. I am going to attempt to address some of the criticisms of the move raised in that move request and just more fully flesh out the reason this article should be moved. As before the grounds for the move are
WP:COMMONNAME. In this ngram you will see a comparison of the relative popularities of Henri de Guise, Henry de Guise, François de Lorraine and Francis de Lorraine
[19] Ngrams are not my favourite method of determining popularity as they tend to be crowded by noise, therefore I will primarily be using google scholar results, restricted to results in English publications since 2000 for a better understanding of the modern usage. Francis of Guise = 53 results Francis of Lorraine = 199 results Francis de Guise = 7 results Francis de Lorraine = 6 results Francis, Duke of Guise = 98 results Francis, Duke de Guise = 1 result Francis, duc of Guise = 0 results Francis, duc de Guise = 4 results Francis of Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 9 results Francis of Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results Francis of Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Francis of Lorraine, duc de Guise = 0 results Francis de Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 1 result Francis de Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 1 result Francis de Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Francis de Lorraine, duc de Guise = 0 results Total for Francis = 379 (give or take, there will be some noise in Francis of Lorraine/Henry of Lorraine and François de Lorraine/Henri de Lorraine due to other people of the same name) François of Guise = 11 results François of Lorraine = 20 results François de Guise = 230 results François de Lorraine = 210 results François, Duke of Guise = 76 results François, Duke de Guise = 5 results François, duc of Guise = 0 results François, duc de Guise = 83 results François of Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 1 results François of Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results François of Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results François of Lorraine, duc de Guise = 3 results François de Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 18 results François de Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results François de Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results François de Lorraine, duc de Guise = 59 results Total for François = 716 (same disclaimed as above for Francis). 716 vs 379: a decisive majority of scholarly usage for the name François. Henry of Guise = 105 results Henry of Lorraine = 52 results Henry de Guise = 31 results Henry de Lorraine = 24 results Henry, Duke of Guise = 115 results Henry, Duke de Guise = 6 results Henry, duc of Guise = 0 results Henry, duc de Guise = 13 results Henry of Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 11 results Henry of Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 1 result Henry of Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Henry of Lorraine, duc de Guise = 0 results Henry de Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 2 results Henry de Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results Henry de Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Henry de Lorraine, duc de Guise = 3 results Total for Henry = 363. Henri of Guise = 23 results Henri of Lorraine = 21 results Henri de Guise = 225 results Henri de Lorraine = 129 results Henri, Duke of Guise = 64 results Henri, Duke de Guise = 2 results Henri, duc of Guise = 0 results Henri, duc de Guise = 87 results Henri of Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 2 results Henri of Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results Henri of Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Henri of Lorraine, duc de Guise = 1 result Henri de Lorraine, Duke of Guise = 7 results Henri de Lorraine, Duke de Guise = 0 results Henri de Lorraine, duc of Guise = 0 results Henri de Lorraine, duc de Guise = 27 results Total for Henri = 588. 588 vs 363 another decisive margin. The google scholar searches for Henri function as evidence for both Henry/Henri I, and Henry/Henri II, as using the numerals would massively depreciate the numbers returned. In addressing the point raised by Srnec in the prior move, we have a majority in English scholarship for the names François and Henri, we do not have a majority for duc de Guise over duke of Guise for the article title (131 duc vs 209 duke for Henri and 149 duc vs 205 duke for François). Beyond the statistical evidence in support of its common usage, I would like to also draw on particular scholarship as I did for my first move request. This will be based on English language scholarship covering the periods of the Italian Wars and the French Wars of Religion covering the life span of François and Henri I, I have less specific scholarship examples for Henri II, however he is covered in a couple of these and the statistical evidence. The first and most important work is the recent (2011) biography of the Guise family 'Martyrs and Murderers: the Guise family and the making of Europe' written by the historian Stuart Carroll. This biography refers to the dukes as follows: François, Henri, Henri. There is also the recent work by the historian Mark Konnert in which they are a title feature (Local Politics in the French Wars of Religion: The Towns of Champagne, the duc de Guise and the Catholic League (1560-1595)) which likewise uses François and Henri. I will include the survey of academic English literature I included in my first move request, with slight additions for academics I have since become aware of. Gould [history of the French Wars of Religion in the south of the kingdom] (2006) = François; Roelker [biography of Jeanne d'Albret] (1968) = François, Henri; Knecht [biography of Catherine de' Medici] (2014) = François, Henri; Diefendorf [history of Paris in the prelude to the St Bartholomew's Day Massacre] (1991) = François, Henri; Roberts [history of the peace making efforts during the wars] (2013) = François, Henri; Sutherland [history of the secretaries of state in the era of Catherine] (1962) = François, Henri; Tullchin (2012) = François, Henri;; Baumgartner (1986) = Henri; Harding (1978) = François, Henri; Heller (2003) = Henri; Potter (1997) = François, Henri; Carroll (2005) = François, Henri; Bernstein (2004) = Henri; Konnert (1997) = François, Henri; Benedict (2003) = François, Henri; Salmon [introduction to French sixteenth century history] (1979) = François, Henri; Shaw (2019) [only English language survey of the Italian Wars] = François; Pitts [biography of Henri IV of France] (2012) = François, Henri; Neuschel (1989) = François; Kingdon (1967) = François, Henri; Greengrass (1988) = François; Conner (2000) = François; Spangler [chief historian of the Guise family in the 17th century, i.e. Henri II] (2016) = Henri, Heap (2019) = François, Henri. Tingle [history of Nantes during the French Wars of Religion] (2006) is a little unusual, refers to François, and Henry; likewise Shimizu [dissertation on Gaspard de Coligny] (1970) refers to Francis, and Henri Holt [biography of the duc d'Anjou] (2002) = Francis, Henry, he is the only French Wars of Religion era academic I am aware of who throughout all his works consistently calls them this way. Wood [military history of the early French Wars of Religion] (2002) never refers to either duke by their first name In some of the above I have detailed the nature of the book in square brackets to indicate the mixture of popular biographies, introductory surveys and more focused studies of various institutions and regions that build this picture. In addition to my common move argument, it is also of note that the article for the seventh duke of Guise is at
François Joseph, Duke of Guise so the present state of affairs in addition to violating common usage, also creates a weird discordance in the line of dukes.
sovietblobfish (
talk)
15:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Lady Henry Somerset → Lady Isabella Somerset – As mentioned in the article, this person "won the court case in 1878 and resumed the style of Lady Isabella Somerset", and after 1878 she used "Lady Isabella Somerset" as her official style. Because of this name change,
the article title of this person in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography is "Somerset [née Somers-Cocks], Lady Isabella Caroline [Lady Henry Somerset]", and the ODNB calls her "Lady Isabella" in the article. The British Museum also registers her as "
Lady Isabella Somerset". There is also an academic article which calls her "
Lady Isabella Somerset". According to
Wikipedia:Article_titles#Name_changes, "When this [a change of name] occurs, we give extra weight to independent, reliable, English-language sources ("reliable sources" for short) written after the name change". Since this person is called "Lady Isabella Somerset" in recent reliable sources, the name of the article should be "Lady Isabella Somerset". The move was already proposed in 2017, but it was not performed.
saebou (
talk)
08:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.
Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.
(
Discuss) – 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel → 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel – I believe that enough time has passed since the last RM (which proposed the simpler "7 October attacks" name and closed with consensus to retain the current title) to re-propose a title change for this article. I believe that "7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel" is the
WP:COMMONNAME for this event, as seen in sources such as: *
Al Jazeera: "... counter the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which saw ..." *
Bloomberg: "... trapped in Gaza since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which prompted ..." *
CBC: "... around the world since the Hamas-led attacks on Israel of Oct. 7 but are now ..." *
CNN: "... from the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel being held ..." *
Euracitiv: "... triggered by the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel in which ..." *
France24: "Before the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that triggered ..." *
ISW: "... spokesperson claimed that the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel was retaliation ..." *
Middle East Eye: "Following the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel and subsequent ..." *
NPR: "... Palestinian armed groups since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that set off the war ..." *
NYTimes: "... including some who participated in the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, and that ..." *
Reuters: "... were involved in the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel that precipitated ..." *
Times of Israel: "... during and after the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel." *
The Conversation: "... participated in the October 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, which resulted ... " *
WaPo: "Since the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attack on Israel, restrictions have ..." Many sources simply say "7 October" or "October 7 attacks" instead of spelling out the full name, but I believe that while "7 October attacks" could be a more COMMON name, I think that it fails
WP:AT#Precision in favor of "7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel."
DecafPotato (
talk) 00:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. —
Amakuru (
talk)
14:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – De La Salle Green Spikers volleyball →
De La Salle Green Archers volleyball – The above existing pages have titles that do emulate the placement of a disambiguating sports descriptor after the team name, per
WP:QUALIFIER. This style of adding descriptors has been prescribed by example by, among other similar college-sports WikiProjects,
this page under
WP:CBBALL and
this page under
WP:CFB for titles of pages about United States college teams. Clearly, these descriptors were prescribed in order to naturally disambiguate (by
WP:NATURAL) a page about a team playing a certain sport from pages about namesake teams that are playing in other sports. In each of the team pages above being requested for moving, however, 1) the team name used is not that of its institution's team's uniform or collective name but the special nickname or unique moniker given to that specific team playing in its sport, so much so that the need for disambiguation disappears. 2) what is produced by the addition of a disambiguating sport descriptor after the team's special nickname is a redundancy. For example, there are no other De La Salle Green Spikers other than the De La Salle Green Archers team playing men's volleyball. For having a redundant title, the page's title then creates
WP:OVERPRECISION and breaches the
WP:CONCISE rule. That, however, can be salvaged by replacing the special moniker with the institution's team's uniform or collective name, a replacement which is what would have the need for disambiguation and erase the redundancy.
Bagoto (
talk) 09:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk)
18:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – Sexual and gender-based violence in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel → Sexual violence in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel – Gender-based violence is defined as "any type of harm that is perpetrated against a person or group of people because of their factual or perceived sex, gender, sexual orientation and/or gender identity".[1] It is not currently clear that this article deals with any such violence other than that of a sexual nature, and even then, the lede states that male Israelis were also subjected to sexual violence (which if true suggests that it was not gender-based). A previous discussion on this topic has also shown that many people do not understand what the term "gender-based violence" actually means, so whether including it in the title is usefully descriptive is quite questionable.
(
Discuss) – Srebrenica massacre → Srebrenica genocide – I suggest that we rename this article to "Srebrenica genocide" now that the UN has issued its resolution on the matter today, designating July 11 as the International Day of Reflection and Commemoration of the 1995 Genocide in Srebrenica Please also check the discussion above.
Njamu (
talk) 06:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (
talk)
09:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)reply
(
Discuss) – 2024 Nuseirat rescue operation →
Nuseirat raid and rescue – Most sources are dual referencing this as a raid, attack or assault rather than just as a rescue.
Guardian "Israeli attacks in central Gaza killed scores of Palestinians, many of them civilians, on Saturday amid a special forces operation to free four hostages held there, with the death toll sparking international outrage."
NYT "Israeli soldiers and special operations police rescued four hostages from Gaza on Saturday amid a heavy air and ground assault",
CNN "Israel’s operation to rescue four hostages took weeks of preparation and involved hundreds of personnel, its military said. But the mission began with a trail of destruction in central Gaza and ended in carnage, according to local authorities."
Selfstudier (
talk)
15:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply