This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The URL listed under website in the infobox leads to a parked domain page. It probably should not be listed here, at least until it is filled with a proper website.-- UKcrow93 ( talk) 23:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
I would like to know if you said the following? “. If I had to bite my tongue and vote for Hilary Clinton I would “ I take it that your willing to bow down to the communist Regime and go along with their agendas and help destroy our beloved country and turn it over to the communist party of China? I would greatly appreciate a trust and sincere answer not a political runaround response. Thank you Mark Harper Columbus Ohio — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.27.79.175 ( talk) 17:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Is this accurate? At this point, isn't he more well known for running for Senate?
"senate" 5,330,000 results for "jd vance 'senate'"
"hillbilly+elegy" 598,000 results for "jd vance 'hillbilly elegy'"
TortillaDePapas ( talk) 16:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
J.D. Vance name is spelled wrong in the title of the page and has a space between the two first initials and is probably spelled wrong in other sections of this page as well Ptero60 ( talk) 09:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
::: An initial is capitalized and is followed by a full point (period) and a space (e.g. J. R. R. Tolkien), unless:
- the person demonstrably has a different, consistently preferred style for their own name; and
- an overwhelming majority of reliable sources use that variant style for that person.
demonstrablyand
consistentlyprefer "J.D." over "J. D."?
demonstrablyand
consistentlyprefer? -- Pemilligan ( talk) 15:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
demonstrablyand
consistentlyprefer?" see now thats where it gets complicated because Vance doesn't use any periods or spaces at all. See [1] "JD will bring Ohio values to Washington" "JD grew up in Middletown, Ohio" "That outsider is JD Vance." etc Horse Eye's Back ( talk) 16:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Davefelmer recently removed all mention of Vance's socially conservative policies in the lead, stating it violated the principles of WP: NPOV and WP: Activism. This seems strange to me, as I'm not sure how it's activism or a violation of NPOV to recount positions that he publicly expouses, is well known for, or has on his campaign site.
Vance is widely known for expousing socially conservative views and his previous support of the Never Trump movement. It's perplexing to say this is not notable.
In the edit, he stated:
Policy positions are NOT typically described in a politician's body because of exactly this kind of WP:ACTVIST cherrypicking. this kind of WP:ACTVIST cherrypicking. And these are yet again WP:UNDUE per their prominence in the article body. Abortion doesn't even cover two full lines of the entire article, same sex marriage doesn't even touch half a line! That's not even remotely close to prominent enough. And then you again put sources in the lead that aren't even in the body. This is simply not WP:NPOV.
"Vance was a critic of Donald Trump during the 2016 election, describing himself as a " Never Trump guy". However, he changed his rhetoric after announcing his Senate candidacy, and apologized for his past critiques. He was endorsed by Trump in April 2022."
The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a SUMMARY OF ITS MOST IMPORTANT CONTENTSWhich being part of the Never Trump movement, opposition to abortion, and support for repealing Obergefell v. Hodges all fit into. Multiple RS have stated that these things are core to his campaign.
At the moment, you just want to include that he was part of a never Trump 'movement' when he just said that once and then emphasize a hypocritical look by going right into him changing his views ahead of his senate race.Vance didn't say that just once. He repeatedly criticized his policies and personality throughout much of his tenure. (2017-2021) There's also been extensive questions about how sincere his endorsement of Vance truly is. Regardless, endorsements aren't usually placed in the lead.
And re gay marriage, as the other user notes, his opposition to a bill doesn't mean he opposes same sex marriage in generalVance has repeatedly stated that he is opposed same-sex marriage and Obergefell v. Hodges, mentioning it in the campaign. Like abortion, multiple news sources have labeled it an important part of his platform.
It's the definition of WP:OR.If multiple reliable sources state that it's one of important parts of his platform: it's not a violation of the policy.
But the socially conservative stuff is not prominent enough in the article body to have WP:DUE weight in the leadThen that's an argument for expanding the body. Not deleting clearly notable parts of his biography. To say that he's not primarily running on a social conservative platform is ridiculous and goes against a multitude of sources.
I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman, but I don't think the gay marriage issue is alive right now," Vance said. "I'm not one of these guys who's looking to try to take people's families and rip them apart."If KlayCax had been using that source to say Mr Vance as a political position would not oppose same-sex marriage, I'd have said okay. Peter Gulutzan ( talk) 15:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Vance is known for his socially conservative views on abortion, same-sex marriage, and transgender issues, representing a brand of conservative nationalism shared with candidates...but I got the links mixed up. But, honestly, thinking more about it: that claim is debatable at best. His stance on abortion and previous opposition to Trump has received significantly more attention in reliable sources. And I (myself) don't think it's that important to include.
If multiple reliable sources state that it's one of important parts of his platform: it's not a violation of the policy, but that's the thing, it IS a violation of the policy if you can't cite those sources, they aren't directly to do with the topic at hand (J.D. Vance) AND they're not in the article.
endorsements aren't usually placed in the lead.As Traftra8 notes, this is strange to point to considering all the things not normally placed in the lead that you've insisted for. Political positions are not normally placed in the lead, see Raphael Warnock, Jon Ossoff, Chuck Schumer, Maggie Hassan and Catherine Cortez Masto as just some examples. Claimed association with broader 'movements' are not normally placed in the lead. Citing information not prominently featured in the article body is not placed in the lead. Yet you seem to be fine with all of those, and it's quite convenient that you want to use one section of the body to cite Vance as part of a Never Trump 'movement' before making it look hypocritical by saying he changed positions when he ran for the Senate, while ignoring that Vance apologized for his past criticisms AND that Trump personally endorsed him from the very same section. At the end of the day, you don't get to pick and choose what to include in the lead to match your views. That's not what the project is about. Davefelmer ( talk) 06:32, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Yet you seem to be fine with all of those, and it's quite convenient that you want to use one section of the body to cite Vance as part of a Never Trump 'movement' before making it look hypocritical by saying he changed positions when he ran for the Senate, while ignoring that Vance apologized for his past criticisms AND that Trump personally endorsed him from the very same section.If there's notable pieces of legislation/positions that they have. Yes, it should be added. See Marjorie Taylor Greene (which is a "good article"). It's remarkably typical to have political positions in the lead. I'm not sure why Vance is an exception. And I have nothing to do with the current articles on Raphael Warnock, Jon Ossoff, Chuck Schumer, Maggie Hassan, or any of the rest.
before making it look hypocritical by saying he changed positions when he ran for the SenateI fail to see how that makes him look hypocritical.
You then say "multiple news sources have labeled" abortion restrictions and opposition to gay marriage as an "important part of his platform", but as ever cannot cite any and none are in the article expressly stating so.Lots of news organizations and commentators have stated it is.
I disagree with putting political positions in the leadThen half of the pages on this site surrounding politicians need rewritten.
At the end of the day, you don't get to pick and choose what to include in the lead to match your views.That's an uncalled for accusation. I've criticized many of the pages currently on this site — including those that relate to the United States (see here) — for left-wing bias that I've seen. Wikipedia articles aren't to make one candidate look "good" or "bad".
You then say "multiple news sources have labeled" abortion restrictions and opposition to gay marriage as an "important part of his platform", but as ever cannot cite any and none are in the article expressly stating so.Here. This isn't to include abortion: which has already been repeatedly addressed. KlayCax ( talk) 14:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Should J.D. Vance's opposition to abortion and previous criticism of Trump be included in the lead of the article?
Version #1:
Vance was a critic of Donald Trump during the 2016 election, becoming a member of the Never Trump movement, but changed his rhetoric after announcing his candidacy. Considered a national conservative and right-wing populist, he supports increased restrictions on abortion, including in cases that involve rape and incest.
Version #2:
Statement above not included.
Arguments can be found above. Thanks! KlayCax ( talk) 15:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
References
Wakelamp d[@-@]b ( talk) 15:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
@hUser:Muboshgu Reasons why.
Is it David or Donald? The article mentions that he changed his last name, but theres no explanation for the differing middle names. -- jonas ( talk) 19:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Recommend omitting "falsely" from the phrase about his claim that President Joe Biden was flooding Ohio with illegal drugs. The first references was an opinion about what he said, and the second made assertions that the information was not true and gave it '4 Pinocchios' but did not conclusively disprove Vance's opinion. Later reports show increases to fentanyl seizures, which counters the Post's article, weakening it's rationale. THEREFORE, the NPOV response would be to remove the value judgement and let the claim lay by itself, without commentary. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdca/pr/fentanyl-seizures-border-continue-spike-making-san-diego-national-epicenter-fentanyl DeknMike ( talk) 03:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Can't fix this myself, so consider this someplace between an edit-semi-protected request and a pointing out the following issues. First, it's uncited. Second, the phrasing is clumsy and silly. I'm pretty sure his local bish didn't ceremoniously tell him, "Augustine of Hippo, be sealed with the gift of the Holy Spirit." I suggest either "Choose Augustine as..." or possibly better, "Choose Augustine of Hippo as his patron saint", since this seems to be directly sourceable. (The American Conservative interview.) 109.255.211.6 ( talk) 10:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello,
I'd like to suggest an edit to JD Vance's Wikipedia Page: /info/en/?search=J._D._Vance.
Under "personal details" on the right-hand side panel, I would like to add in his campaign website: https://jdvance.com/ in addition to his Senate website which is currently linked. I believe that it would be beneficial knowledge to include in the panel information. Please let me know if I'm able to make this edit to include the link, which already currently appears at the bottom in external sources.
Best, Kelley Kelleybab ( talk) 18:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done Wikipedia isn’t an Avenue for politicians to promote their campaigns. I think this request was in good faith, but I will not accept it. Any other thoughts? Illusion Flame ( talk) 21:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
{{
Edit semi-protected}}
template. Per above discussion change is not uncontroversial. Marking answered.
GiovanniSidwell (
talk) 23:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)While I find Easterly's criticism of the book relevant, is it relevant to state that he is a West Virginia native? Vance represents Ohio in the Senate, where his book is also set. While Ohio and West Virginia may share cultural similarities, it seems like a bad precedent to give background for everyone who has a comment or give credibility based on being from West Virginia. We don't write, for example, "Joe Biden, a Pennsylvania native." IAmAaron2 ( talk) 14:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
It is important information to know that Senator JD Vance does not respond to his own constituents' email via his congressional web page and his congressional website appears to be unmonitored, which would lead one to believe that he is not interested in his own state's views, beliefs or positions, which would make it difficult for him to actually uphold his oath as a senator, not to mention earn his taxpayer-funded paychecks. I have written to him time and time and time again. Might as well be hollering into a Holler. Deb Genetin Dgenetin (talk) 16:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply Dgenetin ( talk) 17:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves.Cullen328 ( talk) 19:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Could we get rid of the included sentence, please? Besides, for me, as a non-American, this sentence is beyond comprehensible. I have no idea, what “The New Yorker” stands for in this sentence.
Ceplm ( talk) 14:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The URL listed under website in the infobox leads to a parked domain page. It probably should not be listed here, at least until it is filled with a proper website.-- UKcrow93 ( talk) 23:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
I would like to know if you said the following? “. If I had to bite my tongue and vote for Hilary Clinton I would “ I take it that your willing to bow down to the communist Regime and go along with their agendas and help destroy our beloved country and turn it over to the communist party of China? I would greatly appreciate a trust and sincere answer not a political runaround response. Thank you Mark Harper Columbus Ohio — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.27.79.175 ( talk) 17:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Is this accurate? At this point, isn't he more well known for running for Senate?
"senate" 5,330,000 results for "jd vance 'senate'"
"hillbilly+elegy" 598,000 results for "jd vance 'hillbilly elegy'"
TortillaDePapas ( talk) 16:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
J.D. Vance name is spelled wrong in the title of the page and has a space between the two first initials and is probably spelled wrong in other sections of this page as well Ptero60 ( talk) 09:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
::: An initial is capitalized and is followed by a full point (period) and a space (e.g. J. R. R. Tolkien), unless:
- the person demonstrably has a different, consistently preferred style for their own name; and
- an overwhelming majority of reliable sources use that variant style for that person.
demonstrablyand
consistentlyprefer "J.D." over "J. D."?
demonstrablyand
consistentlyprefer? -- Pemilligan ( talk) 15:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
demonstrablyand
consistentlyprefer?" see now thats where it gets complicated because Vance doesn't use any periods or spaces at all. See [1] "JD will bring Ohio values to Washington" "JD grew up in Middletown, Ohio" "That outsider is JD Vance." etc Horse Eye's Back ( talk) 16:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Davefelmer recently removed all mention of Vance's socially conservative policies in the lead, stating it violated the principles of WP: NPOV and WP: Activism. This seems strange to me, as I'm not sure how it's activism or a violation of NPOV to recount positions that he publicly expouses, is well known for, or has on his campaign site.
Vance is widely known for expousing socially conservative views and his previous support of the Never Trump movement. It's perplexing to say this is not notable.
In the edit, he stated:
Policy positions are NOT typically described in a politician's body because of exactly this kind of WP:ACTVIST cherrypicking. this kind of WP:ACTVIST cherrypicking. And these are yet again WP:UNDUE per their prominence in the article body. Abortion doesn't even cover two full lines of the entire article, same sex marriage doesn't even touch half a line! That's not even remotely close to prominent enough. And then you again put sources in the lead that aren't even in the body. This is simply not WP:NPOV.
"Vance was a critic of Donald Trump during the 2016 election, describing himself as a " Never Trump guy". However, he changed his rhetoric after announcing his Senate candidacy, and apologized for his past critiques. He was endorsed by Trump in April 2022."
The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a SUMMARY OF ITS MOST IMPORTANT CONTENTSWhich being part of the Never Trump movement, opposition to abortion, and support for repealing Obergefell v. Hodges all fit into. Multiple RS have stated that these things are core to his campaign.
At the moment, you just want to include that he was part of a never Trump 'movement' when he just said that once and then emphasize a hypocritical look by going right into him changing his views ahead of his senate race.Vance didn't say that just once. He repeatedly criticized his policies and personality throughout much of his tenure. (2017-2021) There's also been extensive questions about how sincere his endorsement of Vance truly is. Regardless, endorsements aren't usually placed in the lead.
And re gay marriage, as the other user notes, his opposition to a bill doesn't mean he opposes same sex marriage in generalVance has repeatedly stated that he is opposed same-sex marriage and Obergefell v. Hodges, mentioning it in the campaign. Like abortion, multiple news sources have labeled it an important part of his platform.
It's the definition of WP:OR.If multiple reliable sources state that it's one of important parts of his platform: it's not a violation of the policy.
But the socially conservative stuff is not prominent enough in the article body to have WP:DUE weight in the leadThen that's an argument for expanding the body. Not deleting clearly notable parts of his biography. To say that he's not primarily running on a social conservative platform is ridiculous and goes against a multitude of sources.
I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman, but I don't think the gay marriage issue is alive right now," Vance said. "I'm not one of these guys who's looking to try to take people's families and rip them apart."If KlayCax had been using that source to say Mr Vance as a political position would not oppose same-sex marriage, I'd have said okay. Peter Gulutzan ( talk) 15:15, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Vance is known for his socially conservative views on abortion, same-sex marriage, and transgender issues, representing a brand of conservative nationalism shared with candidates...but I got the links mixed up. But, honestly, thinking more about it: that claim is debatable at best. His stance on abortion and previous opposition to Trump has received significantly more attention in reliable sources. And I (myself) don't think it's that important to include.
If multiple reliable sources state that it's one of important parts of his platform: it's not a violation of the policy, but that's the thing, it IS a violation of the policy if you can't cite those sources, they aren't directly to do with the topic at hand (J.D. Vance) AND they're not in the article.
endorsements aren't usually placed in the lead.As Traftra8 notes, this is strange to point to considering all the things not normally placed in the lead that you've insisted for. Political positions are not normally placed in the lead, see Raphael Warnock, Jon Ossoff, Chuck Schumer, Maggie Hassan and Catherine Cortez Masto as just some examples. Claimed association with broader 'movements' are not normally placed in the lead. Citing information not prominently featured in the article body is not placed in the lead. Yet you seem to be fine with all of those, and it's quite convenient that you want to use one section of the body to cite Vance as part of a Never Trump 'movement' before making it look hypocritical by saying he changed positions when he ran for the Senate, while ignoring that Vance apologized for his past criticisms AND that Trump personally endorsed him from the very same section. At the end of the day, you don't get to pick and choose what to include in the lead to match your views. That's not what the project is about. Davefelmer ( talk) 06:32, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Yet you seem to be fine with all of those, and it's quite convenient that you want to use one section of the body to cite Vance as part of a Never Trump 'movement' before making it look hypocritical by saying he changed positions when he ran for the Senate, while ignoring that Vance apologized for his past criticisms AND that Trump personally endorsed him from the very same section.If there's notable pieces of legislation/positions that they have. Yes, it should be added. See Marjorie Taylor Greene (which is a "good article"). It's remarkably typical to have political positions in the lead. I'm not sure why Vance is an exception. And I have nothing to do with the current articles on Raphael Warnock, Jon Ossoff, Chuck Schumer, Maggie Hassan, or any of the rest.
before making it look hypocritical by saying he changed positions when he ran for the SenateI fail to see how that makes him look hypocritical.
You then say "multiple news sources have labeled" abortion restrictions and opposition to gay marriage as an "important part of his platform", but as ever cannot cite any and none are in the article expressly stating so.Lots of news organizations and commentators have stated it is.
I disagree with putting political positions in the leadThen half of the pages on this site surrounding politicians need rewritten.
At the end of the day, you don't get to pick and choose what to include in the lead to match your views.That's an uncalled for accusation. I've criticized many of the pages currently on this site — including those that relate to the United States (see here) — for left-wing bias that I've seen. Wikipedia articles aren't to make one candidate look "good" or "bad".
You then say "multiple news sources have labeled" abortion restrictions and opposition to gay marriage as an "important part of his platform", but as ever cannot cite any and none are in the article expressly stating so.Here. This isn't to include abortion: which has already been repeatedly addressed. KlayCax ( talk) 14:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Should J.D. Vance's opposition to abortion and previous criticism of Trump be included in the lead of the article?
Version #1:
Vance was a critic of Donald Trump during the 2016 election, becoming a member of the Never Trump movement, but changed his rhetoric after announcing his candidacy. Considered a national conservative and right-wing populist, he supports increased restrictions on abortion, including in cases that involve rape and incest.
Version #2:
Statement above not included.
Arguments can be found above. Thanks! KlayCax ( talk) 15:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
References
Wakelamp d[@-@]b ( talk) 15:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
@hUser:Muboshgu Reasons why.
Is it David or Donald? The article mentions that he changed his last name, but theres no explanation for the differing middle names. -- jonas ( talk) 19:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Recommend omitting "falsely" from the phrase about his claim that President Joe Biden was flooding Ohio with illegal drugs. The first references was an opinion about what he said, and the second made assertions that the information was not true and gave it '4 Pinocchios' but did not conclusively disprove Vance's opinion. Later reports show increases to fentanyl seizures, which counters the Post's article, weakening it's rationale. THEREFORE, the NPOV response would be to remove the value judgement and let the claim lay by itself, without commentary. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdca/pr/fentanyl-seizures-border-continue-spike-making-san-diego-national-epicenter-fentanyl DeknMike ( talk) 03:01, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
Can't fix this myself, so consider this someplace between an edit-semi-protected request and a pointing out the following issues. First, it's uncited. Second, the phrasing is clumsy and silly. I'm pretty sure his local bish didn't ceremoniously tell him, "Augustine of Hippo, be sealed with the gift of the Holy Spirit." I suggest either "Choose Augustine as..." or possibly better, "Choose Augustine of Hippo as his patron saint", since this seems to be directly sourceable. (The American Conservative interview.) 109.255.211.6 ( talk) 10:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello,
I'd like to suggest an edit to JD Vance's Wikipedia Page: /info/en/?search=J._D._Vance.
Under "personal details" on the right-hand side panel, I would like to add in his campaign website: https://jdvance.com/ in addition to his Senate website which is currently linked. I believe that it would be beneficial knowledge to include in the panel information. Please let me know if I'm able to make this edit to include the link, which already currently appears at the bottom in external sources.
Best, Kelley Kelleybab ( talk) 18:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Not done Wikipedia isn’t an Avenue for politicians to promote their campaigns. I think this request was in good faith, but I will not accept it. Any other thoughts? Illusion Flame ( talk) 21:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
{{
Edit semi-protected}}
template. Per above discussion change is not uncontroversial. Marking answered.
GiovanniSidwell (
talk) 23:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)While I find Easterly's criticism of the book relevant, is it relevant to state that he is a West Virginia native? Vance represents Ohio in the Senate, where his book is also set. While Ohio and West Virginia may share cultural similarities, it seems like a bad precedent to give background for everyone who has a comment or give credibility based on being from West Virginia. We don't write, for example, "Joe Biden, a Pennsylvania native." IAmAaron2 ( talk) 14:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
It is important information to know that Senator JD Vance does not respond to his own constituents' email via his congressional web page and his congressional website appears to be unmonitored, which would lead one to believe that he is not interested in his own state's views, beliefs or positions, which would make it difficult for him to actually uphold his oath as a senator, not to mention earn his taxpayer-funded paychecks. I have written to him time and time and time again. Might as well be hollering into a Holler. Deb Genetin Dgenetin (talk) 16:51, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply Dgenetin ( talk) 17:05, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves.Cullen328 ( talk) 19:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Could we get rid of the included sentence, please? Besides, for me, as a non-American, this sentence is beyond comprehensible. I have no idea, what “The New Yorker” stands for in this sentence.
Ceplm ( talk) 14:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)