![]() |
The result was delete. v/r - T P 02:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Completely unreferenced article, poorly written, about a non notable individual. Previous afd led to a merge but he is no longer with the Giants. Spanneraol ( talk) 22:49, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Keep and clean up. Has played in the Dominican Professional Baseball League, the highest-level league in the Dominican Republic, therefore he passes WP:BASEBALL/N. Alex ( talk) 12:32, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete a11, story that article author made up. NawlinWiki ( talk) 22:37, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Obviously non-notable. Also, article is poorly written. m'encarta ( t) 22:13, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 02:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:NGRIDIRON. Can't find any trace of him playing pro ball. ...William 21:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
*New information appears to pass
WP:NGRIDIRON having played professionally in the CFL.--
Paul McDonald (
talk) 19:06, 10 November 2013 (UTC) I stand corrected.--
Paul McDonald (
talk)
13:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter with no top tier fights. Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA artist with only two top tier fights both losses. Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter with only single top tier fight Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
On notability grounds - MMA fighter with only one top tier fight. Peter Rehse ( talk) 19:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Retired minor league ballplayer who never played a game in the majors; no multiple exceptional third-party sources out there that would pass GNG. Wizardman 20:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Enthiran. v/r - T P 02:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
There do not appear to be independent reliable sources that are substantively about this character that establish its notability separate from the film in which it appears. The sources that are out there appear to be primarily about the film (plot summaries and the like) and discuss the character only within the context of the film and not from the out-of-universe perspective required when writing about fiction. Fails WP:GNG, WP:PLOT and WP:FICT. Jerry Pepsi ( talk) 20:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Crystal Palace National Sports Centre. ( non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 03:26, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Information is out of date, the plans were shelved and will not ever happen. This should be a footnote on the Crystal Palace National Sports Centre page. Few reliable sources. Claims it will be built by date X which is not true. SheffGruff ( talk) 19:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 02:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Fleischbutter is completely unknown in Germany. Most of the References refer to other products. Fleischbutter is as German as the Christmas Pickle. Rôtkæppchen68 19:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
unknown in germany, does only appear on very few websites and is obscure even on those. 212.90.151.90 ( talk) 11:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Lox. v/r - T P 02:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Record label fails WP:GNG, the notability is not inherited from the founders. The label has not released any albums by artists outside of the founders ( The LOX). Not to mention the entire article is unsourced. STATic message me! 18:39, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
The article lacks self consistency regarding the company, something indicating that it is bizarre already. The references are not all they are suggested to be either. One leads to a Q Mobile phones for sale site. Delete as disguised advertising and salt as repeatedly recreated. With the current paid editing scandal, is this an article that falls under that category? Fiddle Faddle 18:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
On notability grounds - no top tier fights or championships Peter Rehse ( talk) 16:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
On notability grounds - no top their fights Peter Rehse ( talk) 16:30, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 02:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
On notability grounds - no top their fights Peter Rehse ( talk) 16:28, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
On notability grounds - no top their fights purely a local fighter. Peter Rehse ( talk) 16:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was that the nomination was withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Gobōnobō + c 23:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
not even a stub of a biography - just a mention of one thing she wrote 25 years ago Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. Only ever had one role. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 15:50, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Apparent lack of notability despite the claims about being the world's largest single-brand travel franchise company. I find no substantive information in reliable sources via Google, which provides fewer than 80 hits for "Odyssey Tours and Travels". The one reference given in the article is from a post-your-own press release website. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 15:36, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Heckler & Koch G3. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Lacking in content and notablity Zackmann08 ( talk) 16:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Timbre. v/r - T P 02:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Questionable mathematics that do not show notability, usage or relevancy to a broader usage as to harmonics. It lacks context and if it can be used, should be merged to the harmonics page - but its stand alone or credibility is shaky. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 02:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 21:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Lack of independent citations to prove notability. Cannot find history on official site - likely unverifiable. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 02:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. Redirection can be discussed on the article talk page. v/r - T P 21:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Minor recurring character from the 1980s incarnation of the BBC serial Doctor Who. Fails the WP:GNG. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 03:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 00:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Award is not major. Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. One of a glut of of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:48, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Online journal, not indexed in any selective dayabases. Article creator de-PRODded and added several "independent sources". None of these is actually about the journal, these are simply articles, blogs, and a dissertation, which have cited an article published in this journal. Does not pass WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 17:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Non-notable compilation album. PROD was denied. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Angry Video Game Nerd. v/r - T P 21:48, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Per WP:NFF: " films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines". AVGN is notable, some other names in the film are notable, but literally 100% of the sourcing is WP:PRIMARY. I could find absolutely zero secondary sourcing, or evidence that the film has yet achieved notability on its own. Maybe once things are actually wrapped up and it gets closer to release, but so far, I'm finding nothing reliable about it.
ETA: Last AFD closed in 2011 with consensus to redirect to the AVGN's main article. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 12:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't think there is enough evidence of WP:Notability for this single station to warrant its inclusion as a stand-alone article. I previously redirected individual BTS station articles to the articles for their respective lines, but they were restored by Mr.BuriramCN. (I haven't been able to engage in discussion with him.) I'm testing the water with this AfD, and may nominate the other related articles later. Paul_012 ( talk) 11:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Will userfy on request v/r - T P 21:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
This article is about a women's footballer that hasn't represented the national team, which means it fails WP:NFOOTY. There are some members of the women's football task force who believe that representing their country at youth international level or appearing in the UEFA Women's Champions League also confer notability, but this individual has not done any of those. The most important, however, is that the subject hasn't received significant coverage in reliable sources, which means it fails WP:GNG. Mentoz86 ( talk) 11:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete and salt as unambiguous advertising. (To be explicit: I'm marking this as closed because it's already been speedy-deleted; the deletion was performed by Jimfbleak.) — me_ and 17:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails the general notability guideline after good-faith search for sources. — me_ and 11:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
This is article about a software. There is nothing about the company.
"Note that a specific product or service may be notable on its own, without the company providing it being notable in its own right. In this case, an article on the product may be appropriate, and notability of the company itself is not inherited as a result." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvkozyrev ( talk • contribs) 11:56, 8 November 2013 (UTC) Mvkozyrev ( talk) 12:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I do not understand why this artist has his own Wikipedia page. I'm from the same town he is from, and I have never heard of him (except for a search of Asian-American hip hop artists on Wikipedia). Other than that, he's not notable at all and there's only a few videos of his music on YouTube that have very few views. No disrespect to him, but he is not notable at all. Cyanidethistles ( talk) 09:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete per consensus at this recent AfD, which established that season articles should follow the same notability guidelines as the players, i.e. fully professional leagues only. C 679 09:39, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages under the same criteria:
C 679 09:46, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by TorresChelsea96 ( talk • contribs) 10:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Secret account 18:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
A seven-employee firm. I don;t see how it can possibly be notable. , and the article provides no evidence to show otherwise. DGG ( talk ) 09:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 21:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
DePRODed by creator without addressing the issues. Concern was: recreation of a previously deleted article. Although this makes claims to importance, no independent 3rd party sources have been suppled that assert notability per WP:ORG. Notability is not inherited from notable customers. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment I didn't notice any qualifying sources on my first run-through when the article was created, but now I found two, in the New Zealand Herald and the Melville Times. Is two a sufficient number? Yes, having famous people among your customers doesn't confer notability. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
How many more references are needed for it to be considered notable? Lucy4962 ( talk) 03:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC) — Lucy4962 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Analysis of sources:
This looks like the typical result of scouring the internet for anything that contains the word Gascoigne and pasting it to the article. I'll leave it to the community to decide if these sources add to notability. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
What about if i add photos from the company's relationship with Lady Diana and John Howard? I tried to upload when the article was created but was told the account wasn't old enough etc? Lucy4962 ( talk) 06:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Lucy4962, do you have a connection to the company? LibStar ( talk) 10:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Promotional article that fails WP:GNG. Logical Cowboy ( talk) 05:16, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:ORG. It is a clearly promotional written by Paid Editor socking across accounts Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 00:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by User:Menchi per CSD G7, "The author/creator has blanked own page." (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:12, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
WP:NOTABILITY. The closest to a supportable claim of notability in this WP:AUTOBIO is the NAIA All-American Athlete, but it turns out that was an award for the entire relay team of which he was a member, and that doesn't seem to meet WP:NCOLLATH standards. Nat Gertler ( talk) 05:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
No notability separate from the work of fiction this hails from. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 03:51, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Notability is not established. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 03:17, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Utterly fails WP:GNG. Not a hugely important character, sources that exist are just plot recaps. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Child's Play (film series). v/r - T P 21:41, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Unremarkable fictional character, fails WP:GNG. Suggest that List of Child's Play characters be created. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Wifione Message 04:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
May not meet WP:NSOFT.
Note, article was contributed by someone whose username is the same as the company's name, but has been rewritten by me. — rybec 02:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
I disagree, It does follow WP:NSOFT, it is being tried as an alternative to passports. JDgeek1729 ( talk) 03:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 21:41, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
WP:NOT Information is by definition constantly out of date. Not an encyclopedic topic. Gaijin42 ( talk) 01:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Keep. Kind of withdrawn by nominator. Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 10:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Elementary schools are rarely notable, and the districts which they are a part of are actually less notable, as they are just an office for coordination of the various schools. not every govt org gets an article. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 01:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Note: Somebody please close this now as speedy keep. Thanks.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk)
10:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Secret account 18:27, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
advertising through the backdoor The Banner talk 01:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
This article should not be deleted. This article does not violate any Wikipedia Policy and Guidelines. Since this article has very recently been approved, Perhaps it needs more time to develop. Juiceentertainment ( talk) 02:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC) — Juiceentertainment ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
http://popdust.com/2012/03/14/yasha-swag-go-go-go-viral-video/ http://www.dailydot.com/news/pickles-yasha-swag-cheating-youtube-views/ http://now.msn.com/will-yasha-swag-become-this-year%E2%80%99s-rebecca-black http://www.thefrisky.com/2012-12-07/okay-what-is-this-yasha-swag-pickles-video-all-about/ http://newmediarockstars.com/2012/12/internet-nonsense-yasha-swags-pickles-is-the-best-and-also-the-worst/ http://news.softpedia.com/news/Viral-of-the-Day-Yasha-Swag-Pickles-313398.shtml http://planet1051.com/yasha-swags-pickles-video-has-over-8-million-views-in-7-days-why-video/ http://entertainment.ie/wtf/Forget-Ultan-Sherry-say-hello-to-Yasha-Swag/155488.htm http://worldofwonder.net/terrible-viral-video-of-the-day-yasha-swags-pickles/ http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/music/beta-digital-column-29698038.html
It looks like he botted on his old videos but this time around he hoaxed the nasa website to get viral attention once again. I don't know if you guys think this is significant enough to add as an article? Or link it somehow with Remember The 13th?
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Essentially unreferenced, no real notability ES &L 01:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. v/r - T P 02:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Completely unreferenced article, poorly written, about a non notable individual. Previous afd led to a merge but he is no longer with the Giants. Spanneraol ( talk) 22:49, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Keep and clean up. Has played in the Dominican Professional Baseball League, the highest-level league in the Dominican Republic, therefore he passes WP:BASEBALL/N. Alex ( talk) 12:32, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete a11, story that article author made up. NawlinWiki ( talk) 22:37, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Obviously non-notable. Also, article is poorly written. m'encarta ( t) 22:13, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 02:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:NGRIDIRON. Can't find any trace of him playing pro ball. ...William 21:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
*New information appears to pass
WP:NGRIDIRON having played professionally in the CFL.--
Paul McDonald (
talk) 19:06, 10 November 2013 (UTC) I stand corrected.--
Paul McDonald (
talk)
13:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter with no top tier fights. Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:06, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA artist with only two top tier fights both losses. Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
MMA fighter with only single top tier fight Peter Rehse ( talk) 20:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
On notability grounds - MMA fighter with only one top tier fight. Peter Rehse ( talk) 19:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 21:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Retired minor league ballplayer who never played a game in the majors; no multiple exceptional third-party sources out there that would pass GNG. Wizardman 20:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Enthiran. v/r - T P 02:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
There do not appear to be independent reliable sources that are substantively about this character that establish its notability separate from the film in which it appears. The sources that are out there appear to be primarily about the film (plot summaries and the like) and discuss the character only within the context of the film and not from the out-of-universe perspective required when writing about fiction. Fails WP:GNG, WP:PLOT and WP:FICT. Jerry Pepsi ( talk) 20:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Crystal Palace National Sports Centre. ( non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 03:26, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Information is out of date, the plans were shelved and will not ever happen. This should be a footnote on the Crystal Palace National Sports Centre page. Few reliable sources. Claims it will be built by date X which is not true. SheffGruff ( talk) 19:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 02:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Fleischbutter is completely unknown in Germany. Most of the References refer to other products. Fleischbutter is as German as the Christmas Pickle. Rôtkæppchen68 19:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
unknown in germany, does only appear on very few websites and is obscure even on those. 212.90.151.90 ( talk) 11:37, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Lox. v/r - T P 02:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Record label fails WP:GNG, the notability is not inherited from the founders. The label has not released any albums by artists outside of the founders ( The LOX). Not to mention the entire article is unsourced. STATic message me! 18:39, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
The article lacks self consistency regarding the company, something indicating that it is bizarre already. The references are not all they are suggested to be either. One leads to a Q Mobile phones for sale site. Delete as disguised advertising and salt as repeatedly recreated. With the current paid editing scandal, is this an article that falls under that category? Fiddle Faddle 18:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
On notability grounds - no top tier fights or championships Peter Rehse ( talk) 16:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
On notability grounds - no top their fights Peter Rehse ( talk) 16:30, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 02:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
On notability grounds - no top their fights Peter Rehse ( talk) 16:28, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
On notability grounds - no top their fights purely a local fighter. Peter Rehse ( talk) 16:25, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was that the nomination was withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Gobōnobō + c 23:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
not even a stub of a biography - just a mention of one thing she wrote 25 years ago Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. Only ever had one role. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 15:50, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Apparent lack of notability despite the claims about being the world's largest single-brand travel franchise company. I find no substantive information in reliable sources via Google, which provides fewer than 80 hits for "Odyssey Tours and Travels". The one reference given in the article is from a post-your-own press release website. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 15:36, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Heckler & Koch G3. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:39, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Lacking in content and notablity Zackmann08 ( talk) 16:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was merge to Timbre. v/r - T P 02:34, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Questionable mathematics that do not show notability, usage or relevancy to a broader usage as to harmonics. It lacks context and if it can be used, should be merged to the harmonics page - but its stand alone or credibility is shaky. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 02:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 21:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Lack of independent citations to prove notability. Cannot find history on official site - likely unverifiable. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 02:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. Redirection can be discussed on the article talk page. v/r - T P 21:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Minor recurring character from the 1980s incarnation of the BBC serial Doctor Who. Fails the WP:GNG. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 03:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 00:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Not notable. Award is not major. Lacks coverage about him in independent reliable sources. One of a glut of of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme ( talk) 07:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:48, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Online journal, not indexed in any selective dayabases. Article creator de-PRODded and added several "independent sources". None of these is actually about the journal, these are simply articles, blogs, and a dissertation, which have cited an article published in this journal. Does not pass WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 17:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Non-notable compilation album. PROD was denied. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Angry Video Game Nerd. v/r - T P 21:48, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Per WP:NFF: " films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines". AVGN is notable, some other names in the film are notable, but literally 100% of the sourcing is WP:PRIMARY. I could find absolutely zero secondary sourcing, or evidence that the film has yet achieved notability on its own. Maybe once things are actually wrapped up and it gets closer to release, but so far, I'm finding nothing reliable about it.
ETA: Last AFD closed in 2011 with consensus to redirect to the AVGN's main article. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 12:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:20, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I don't think there is enough evidence of WP:Notability for this single station to warrant its inclusion as a stand-alone article. I previously redirected individual BTS station articles to the articles for their respective lines, but they were restored by Mr.BuriramCN. (I haven't been able to engage in discussion with him.) I'm testing the water with this AfD, and may nominate the other related articles later. Paul_012 ( talk) 11:26, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Will userfy on request v/r - T P 21:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
This article is about a women's footballer that hasn't represented the national team, which means it fails WP:NFOOTY. There are some members of the women's football task force who believe that representing their country at youth international level or appearing in the UEFA Women's Champions League also confer notability, but this individual has not done any of those. The most important, however, is that the subject hasn't received significant coverage in reliable sources, which means it fails WP:GNG. Mentoz86 ( talk) 11:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete and salt as unambiguous advertising. (To be explicit: I'm marking this as closed because it's already been speedy-deleted; the deletion was performed by Jimfbleak.) — me_ and 17:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Fails the general notability guideline after good-faith search for sources. — me_ and 11:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
This is article about a software. There is nothing about the company.
"Note that a specific product or service may be notable on its own, without the company providing it being notable in its own right. In this case, an article on the product may be appropriate, and notability of the company itself is not inherited as a result." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvkozyrev ( talk • contribs) 11:56, 8 November 2013 (UTC) Mvkozyrev ( talk) 12:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I do not understand why this artist has his own Wikipedia page. I'm from the same town he is from, and I have never heard of him (except for a search of Asian-American hip hop artists on Wikipedia). Other than that, he's not notable at all and there's only a few videos of his music on YouTube that have very few views. No disrespect to him, but he is not notable at all. Cyanidethistles ( talk) 09:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete per consensus at this recent AfD, which established that season articles should follow the same notability guidelines as the players, i.e. fully professional leagues only. C 679 09:39, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages under the same criteria:
C 679 09:46, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by TorresChelsea96 ( talk • contribs) 10:18, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Secret account 18:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
A seven-employee firm. I don;t see how it can possibly be notable. , and the article provides no evidence to show otherwise. DGG ( talk ) 09:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. v/r - T P 21:47, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
DePRODed by creator without addressing the issues. Concern was: recreation of a previously deleted article. Although this makes claims to importance, no independent 3rd party sources have been suppled that assert notability per WP:ORG. Notability is not inherited from notable customers. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 08:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment I didn't notice any qualifying sources on my first run-through when the article was created, but now I found two, in the New Zealand Herald and the Melville Times. Is two a sufficient number? Yes, having famous people among your customers doesn't confer notability. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
How many more references are needed for it to be considered notable? Lucy4962 ( talk) 03:40, 11 November 2013 (UTC) — Lucy4962 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Analysis of sources:
This looks like the typical result of scouring the internet for anything that contains the word Gascoigne and pasting it to the article. I'll leave it to the community to decide if these sources add to notability. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:29, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
What about if i add photos from the company's relationship with Lady Diana and John Howard? I tried to upload when the article was created but was told the account wasn't old enough etc? Lucy4962 ( talk) 06:48, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Lucy4962, do you have a connection to the company? LibStar ( talk) 10:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Promotional article that fails WP:GNG. Logical Cowboy ( talk) 05:16, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:ORG. It is a clearly promotional written by Paid Editor socking across accounts Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 00:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by User:Menchi per CSD G7, "The author/creator has blanked own page." (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000 (talk) 11:12, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
WP:NOTABILITY. The closest to a supportable claim of notability in this WP:AUTOBIO is the NAIA All-American Athlete, but it turns out that was an award for the entire relay team of which he was a member, and that doesn't seem to meet WP:NCOLLATH standards. Nat Gertler ( talk) 05:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
No notability separate from the work of fiction this hails from. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 03:51, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Notability is not established. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 03:17, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Utterly fails WP:GNG. Not a hugely important character, sources that exist are just plot recaps. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:29, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Child's Play (film series). v/r - T P 21:41, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Unremarkable fictional character, fails WP:GNG. Suggest that List of Child's Play characters be created. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 02:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Wifione Message 04:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
May not meet WP:NSOFT.
Note, article was contributed by someone whose username is the same as the company's name, but has been rewritten by me. — rybec 02:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
I disagree, It does follow WP:NSOFT, it is being tried as an alternative to passports. JDgeek1729 ( talk) 03:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was keep. v/r - T P 21:41, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
WP:NOT Information is by definition constantly out of date. Not an encyclopedic topic. Gaijin42 ( talk) 01:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Keep. Kind of withdrawn by nominator. Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 10:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Elementary schools are rarely notable, and the districts which they are a part of are actually less notable, as they are just an office for coordination of the various schools. not every govt org gets an article. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 01:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Note: Somebody please close this now as speedy keep. Thanks.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk)
10:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
The result was delete. Secret account 18:27, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
advertising through the backdoor The Banner talk 01:09, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
This article should not be deleted. This article does not violate any Wikipedia Policy and Guidelines. Since this article has very recently been approved, Perhaps it needs more time to develop. Juiceentertainment ( talk) 02:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC) — Juiceentertainment ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
http://popdust.com/2012/03/14/yasha-swag-go-go-go-viral-video/ http://www.dailydot.com/news/pickles-yasha-swag-cheating-youtube-views/ http://now.msn.com/will-yasha-swag-become-this-year%E2%80%99s-rebecca-black http://www.thefrisky.com/2012-12-07/okay-what-is-this-yasha-swag-pickles-video-all-about/ http://newmediarockstars.com/2012/12/internet-nonsense-yasha-swags-pickles-is-the-best-and-also-the-worst/ http://news.softpedia.com/news/Viral-of-the-Day-Yasha-Swag-Pickles-313398.shtml http://planet1051.com/yasha-swags-pickles-video-has-over-8-million-views-in-7-days-why-video/ http://entertainment.ie/wtf/Forget-Ultan-Sherry-say-hello-to-Yasha-Swag/155488.htm http://worldofwonder.net/terrible-viral-video-of-the-day-yasha-swags-pickles/ http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/music/beta-digital-column-29698038.html
It looks like he botted on his old videos but this time around he hoaxed the nasa website to get viral attention once again. I don't know if you guys think this is significant enough to add as an article? Or link it somehow with Remember The 13th?
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Essentially unreferenced, no real notability ES &L 01:08, 8 November 2013 (UTC)