![]() |
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Extensive unsourced claims of notability (first, popular), tagged for a long time without resolution of concerns about tone and lack of citations. DMacks ( talk) 23:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I cannot find any significant coverage of this person in secondary sources, as required to meet WP:BIO. SmartSE ( talk) 21:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Extended content
|
---|
PUBLICATIONS AIGA American Institute of Graphic Arts, 1999 Page 276: New Urbanity: The Entertainment District in Singapore (Fifty Books and Fifty Covers) Bone Show 2003, Best of New England Design Page 051: Hong Kong: Defining the Edge ART DIRECTORS CLUB OF BOSTON: The Design Show 1985 Page 445: Peabody Museum of Archeology and Ethnology Plant Migration Communications Art Award of Excellence 2002 Page Hong Kong: Defining the Edge DAVID CARTER PUBLISHER American Corporate Identity, 18; David Carter, 2003 Page 113: Freed Arnold Architecture Letterhead Page 114: The Stubbins Associates, Letterhead Page 115: Arz Travel Letterhead Page 116: Nassar Design Letterhead Page 116: Lotus Shipping Company Letterhead Page 118: AAA Letterhead Page 119: Coastal Leasing Letterhead Page 119: Quest Partners Letterhead Page 166: Jeffry Pond Letterhead Page 204: Gresham Palace Building Wrapping HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS American Corporate Identity 19, 2004 Page 99: Rocio Urrquijo Letterhead Page 117: Marcoz Letterhead Page 191: University of Utah Signage Page 211: Leers Weinzapfel Light and Measure Catalogue Page 225: The Stubbins Associates Hospitality Brochure HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS American Corporate Identity 20, 2005 Page 123: Ginsburg Hallowell Stationary Page 163: French Offsett Partners Stationary Page 169: TSA Nevada Stationary HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS American Corporate Identity 21, 2006 Page 253: NOK Foundation, Inc. Logo Page 202: Weidlinger Associates Capabilities Brochure HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Creativity 32, 2003 Page 238: Nassar Design Ribbon Holiday Card Page 298: Nassar Design Stationary Gold Medal HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Creativity 33 David Carter, 2004 Page 149: Mireille Honein Catalogue Page 207: The Stubbins Associates Award Series HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Creativity 34 David Carter, 2005 Page 177: Beirut City Center Book Jacket HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Creativity 35 David Carter, 2006 Page 65: Oh Ah World Day Design Poster Page 70: Unesco Literacy Poster Page 166: Japan Transfer Page 222: Act of Generosity Page 255: Nasar Holiday Card Star HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Creativity 36 David Carter, 2007 Page 164: Baalbeck International Festival Poster Page 214: Extending Modernism in the Monumental City HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Global Corporate Identity 2, 2005 Page 24: Lotus Shipping Company Logo Page 76: Fevzi gandur Denizcilik A.C Logo Page 115: AAA Atelier des Architectes Associés Stationary Page 200: Lotus Shipping Company Stationary Page 230: Nassar Design Stationary Page 239: Gresham Palace Page 304: Genoa: Making the Space of the City Booklet HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS The Big Book of Business Cards, 2005 Page 268: Nassar Design, Marcoz antiques • decorations, Archives for historical Documentation, Westgate Biological Ltd., Page 269: Brave Heart Fund, NOK Foundation, Thomson French Matsumoto Page 270: Fevzi Gandur Denizcilik, The Stubbins Associates, N2 Consulting HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS The Book of Color, 2003 Page 15: Louise Wegmann Catalogue Page 338: Boston Public Library Mural HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS The Little Book of Layouts, Good Design and Why They Work, 2003 Pages 177, 178, 179: Weidlinger Associates, Inc. Capabilities Brochure old HEARST BOOK INTERNATIONAL The Big Book of Logos, 1999 Page 72 #7: Coastal Leasing Logo Page 73 #14: Elizabeth Gibb Logo HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS The Big Book New Design Ideas, 2003 Page 169: Harvard Pusey Library Page 249: Ginsburg Hallowell Stationary Page 283: Index GRAPHIC DESIGN: usa AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 1998 Page 223: Projecting Beirut: Harvard Design School (Poster) AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 1999 Page 91: Weidlinger Associates, Inc. (Announcements) Page 104: Singapore Entertainment (Book Covers) Page 150: AAA Stationary (Corporate Identity Program) Page 218: Cosentini (Packaging) AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 2000 Page 87: Sea-Dar (Cards) Page 107: Norman Foster and Partners (Books) Page 170: Lotus Shipping Company (Letterhead Stationary Page 236: Nassar Design Millennium Card (Self-Promotion) AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 2002 Page 84: Leers Weinzapfel Announcement 1st Page 139: Hong Kong Book (Editorial Book Design) Page 146: Louise Wegmann Catalogue (Editorial Design Publications) Page 164: Nassar Design Stationary (Identity Design) Page 165: Elizabeth Gibb (Identity Design) Page 165: Jeffry Pond (Identity Design) AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 2004 Page 180: Theatre at the Pudding Page 225: Weidlinger Associates, Logo Page 301: Genoa Waterfront AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 2005 Page 80: Leers Weinzapfel Recent University Work Page 147: Japan Transfer Page 180: Freed Arnold Stationary) Page 0: Leers Weinzapfel Recent Courthouse Work Page 147: SOLIDERE Page 0: Nassar Design Holiday Card 2005 Page 252: AIGA: World Day of Design Page 270: Nassar Design: Generosity Circles the World AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 2006 1. Nabil Nahas Opium and Candy 2. OBEO Design Logo 3. Washington Modernism 4. NOK Foundation Corporate ID 5. SE FOR INTERIORS Logo 6. Nassar Design Holiday Card GRAPHIS POSTER ANNUAL 2004 Page 20, 21: Genoa Waterfront Posters GRAPHIS LOGO DESIGN 6 2004 Page 140 Coastal Leasing
PRINT Print Regional Design Annual, 2001 Page 287: Ecce Homo Print Regional Design Annual, 2002 Page 288 (187): Louise Wegmann Catalogue Page 288 (187): Hong Kong Book Print Regional Design Annual, 2003 Page 288: Mireille Honeïn Catalogue Print Regional Design Annual, 2006 Page 257: Nabil Nahas Opium and Candy
Letterhead and Logo Design 7, 2001 Sayles Graphic Design Page 83: Nassar Design Stationary Letterhead and Logo Design, 2003 Top Design Studio Page 19: Hybrid Letterhead Page 58: Leers Weinzapfel Letterhead Mastering Materials, Bindings, & Finishes Art of Creative Production by Catharine Fishel 2007 Page 56: Nabil Nahas Catalogue Page 143: Louise Wegmann Fundraising Brochure One-Color Graphics, The Power of Contrast, 2002 Chen Design Associates Page 18: Arnold Freed Architecture (Origins The Core Identity) Page 21: Jorge Silvetti Stationary Page 84: Harvard School of Government Card (Scion Collateral Offspring) Page 140: Nassar Design Millennium Card (Micro An Intimate Impression) Page 155: Hong Kong Book (the Third Dimension). 1000 Graphic Elements Details for Distinctive Design 2004 Wilson Harvey: London Page 69 # 0195: Louise Wegmann Fund-raising brochure Page 149 #0437: Weidlinger Associates, Inc 50th promotional package Page 187 #0573: Nassar Design Peace Ribbon 1000 Greetings Creative Correspondence Designed for all Occasions 2004 Peter King & Company Page 32: Nassar Design Peace Ribbon Page 41: Nassar Design Stationary Page 63: Hybrid Moving Card Page 73: Weidlinger Holiday Card (Structure) Page 76: Sea Dar Holiday Card Page 94: Nassar Design: The Edge of New Beginning Page 115: The Stubbins Associates Holiday Card Page 136: The Stubbins Associates Moving Announcement Page 175: Moustapha Khalidy Exhibition Announcement Page 193: Women in Practice: Landscape in Architecture Announcement Page 245: Contemporary European Landscape Design Announcement Page 260: Hart-Weidlinger Announcement Page 265: L’Habitation au Liban Postcard Page 270: Baalbeck Bookmark Page 276: Leers Weinzapfel College Awards Announcement 1000 Bags, Tags & Labels by Kiki Eldridge 2006 Page 171 entry 0602: Leers Weinzpfel Associates Label Page 251 entry 0859 TSA label Page 251 entry 0860 The Stubbins Associates, Inc. Label Page 259 entry 0889 Nassar Design Label Page 311 Index 1000 Retail Graphics by JGA 2006 Page 123 entry 0404: SE Merchandising Tag Page 203 entry 0690: The Chinese Porcelain Company Bag Page 268: entry 0911: Gresham Palace Construction Banner The Art of Promotion: Creating Distinction Through Innovative Production Techniques 2005 By Lisa L. Cyr Pages 176, 177: Genoa: Posters series The Art of Promotion: Creating Distinction Through Innovative Production Techniques 2003 Lisa L. Cyr Page 76-77: Weidlinger 50th promotional (Unique Construction, Folds, and Die-Cuts) Page 44-45: Hong Kong (Unconventional Surfaces and Printing Techniques) The Best of Brochure Design, 2008 Perry Chua Page 129: Louise Wegmann Brochure The Best of Brochure Design, 2005 Willoughby Design Group Page 42: Louise Wegmann Brochure The Best of Brochure Design 10, 2009 Perry Chua Page: Harvard Graduate School of Design The Best of Business Cards Design 5, 2002 Cheryl Dangel Cullen Page 122: Nassar Design Business card Vellum Page 144: Marcoz The Best of Business Cards Design 6, 2004 Blackcoffee Page 118: Nassar Design Page 130: N-2 Consulting Page 137: Thirty Things Page 165: Joumana Ghandour Page 201: Freed Arnold Architecture The Best of Business Cards Design 6, 2006 Loewy-London Page 156 #283: Nassar Design Business Card Page 162 #295: Rania Matar Photography The Best of Business Cards Design 8, 2008 Sibley Peteet Page 119 #3: Nassar Design Business Card The Little Book of Big Promotions, 2007 By Cheryl Dangel Cullen, Lisa L. Cyr and Lisa Hickey Page 44/45: Defining The Edge Hong Kong Book Page76/77: Weidlinger Origami |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Usman Masood ( talk • contribs) 22:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that Wikipedia isn't for countries made up one day. Sandstein 09:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Completing an incomplete nomination Reaper Eternal ( talk) 21:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
-- Leodescal ( talk) 01:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Bristol Grammar School. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unsourced school song article, should be merged into Bristol Grammar School Bob Re-born ( talk) 20:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
While this comedy duo does exist, I cannot find sufficient rs coverage to confer notability per wp standards. Tagged for notability and lack of refs for nearly 2 years. Epeefleche ( talk) 19:29, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Can be userfied on request. Sandstein 09:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
no indication of WP:notability. New linux distribution still in early development. No independent sources. Disputed prod. noq ( talk) 17:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Even though there is no indication of WP:notability and even though Cinux is a new linux distribution still in early development, there is no reason why this article should be deleted. There are several entries around the internet, in different forums from people asking what Cinux is. It would be better if there was an article on Wikipedia than answeres around the internet without any liability. If you think this is a poor article, check out Bodhi's Linux article. This one has more information in it. conmarapgr ( conmarapgr) 20:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
That is what I said. Forums are not reliable. That's why I chose Wikipedia to publish an article. The codeplex page you found is not affiliated with the project, the launchpad is and states that clearly. OSArena.net on the other hand has it's own section ( OSArena->OSArena Projects->Cinux). There is a list of several articles that state the affiliation of the project. Google News does not contain news about Cinux but, the project was published on a Greek Magazine called Linux Inside and the owner has written an article twice for the magazine, check it out. conmarapgr ( conmarapgr) 20:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Sundering of the Elves. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Article does not indicate how it meets notability. Only one primary reference is used. GimliDotNet ( talk) 17:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Snow keep. Deletion concerns have been addressed. ( non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Totally unreferenced subject. Written not like an encyclopedia article but like a directory. Stedrick ( talk) 16:35, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NMUSIC. Band put out one album, on a label which appears to have put out just three albums before disappearing. Nat Gertler ( talk) 16:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per WP:G3. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Biography of a minor, originally created by a WP:SPA. Only claim to notability is "is known for the youngest journalist working in ABS-CBN" which is insufficient. Prod removed by a similarly-named new account, so bringing to AfD. Various "references" are basically to versions of the same "interview" published on non- reliable sites. Falls far short of meeting WP:CREATIVE; at best WP:TOOSOON. AllyD ( talk) 15:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Although he plays for fully pro club his only appearance for the club was last season when they were in the Scottish Second Division & therefore fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Topic fails to meet WP:GNG and is filled with WP:OR. Article is almost entirely unreferenced, the only footnote pointing to an anecdote about a television scheduling change not related to either two main topics of the article (WWF/GCW). Google search of "black saturday wrestling" and "black saturday wwf" provides no related coverage of the article subject. Sottolacqua ( talk) 15:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This is a small $25000 ITF tournament, so doesn't meet the tournament notability guidelines used by Wikiproject tennis, see:
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tennis/Article_guidelines
MakeSense64 (
talk)
08:18, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because [content forks of the main article]:
I am listing this AfD to see how it goes. There are over 400 similar articles for small ITF tournaments, which can be found on this category page: 2011 ITF Women's Circuit. MakeSense64 ( talk) 08:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Delete due to lack of notability established through significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Possible hoax. All sources limited to Facebook and talent recruiting sites. Company website is nonexistent. Best regards, Cind. amuse (Cindy) 14:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep Nomination withdrawn based on improvement, no outstanding delete !votes. Jclemens ( talk) 03:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC) reply
A relatively unnoteable actor with no references to pages other than IMDB, an offical website and a Twitter feed. Also there appears to be edit warring, persistent vandalism, page ownership, and a conflict of interest (see edit summary
[1]).
Cocoaguy
ここがいい
05:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
reply
*Delete Zero sources, no indication of wp:notability. Most variants of the article have looked like self-blogging. North8000 (
talk)
15:00, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:49, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
no notability, created himself with sockpuppets Gracioso ( talk) 13:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Userfied to author. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
WP:BALL, also the official website, IMDb and blog entries are not WP:RS. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Many thanks, I have added further references in the hope that this is not removed. The film is currently being filmed and is registered with the british film council ( http://film.britishcouncil.org/shaniqua) and the Internet Movie Database ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2112262/). If I can add anything else to help the article please let me know. I've also added a link (this is available on various sites) which shows the distribution agreement which was announced in september 2011, ( http://www.metalonrock.tv/frozenecho/pressrelease-25sep2011.pdf). Kind regards Danielle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielle Kidman ( talk • contribs) 13:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I'm suprised that IMDB isn't recognised as a reputable source when it comes to films? I've also attached various interviews and news reports with cast and crew if that assists in keeping the page?
http://www.hertsad.co.uk/news/st_albans_actress_in_starring_film_role_1_1160673 http://fameonline.co.uk/2011/12/local-girl-emma-louise-cargill-makes-it-to-the-big-screen/ http://www.movievine.com/interviews/interview-with-mark-noyce/ http://mattjhorn.wordpress.com/2011/08/22/mark-noyce-on-the-ropes-2011/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielle Kidman ( talk • contribs) 14:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I totally agree that many films 'say' they are being made and never see the light of day so understand your concerns, but this is being talked about in various interviews, news pages and I've also linked to the official press release from cornerstone media international who are the distributors. None of these are the efforts of people 'responsible' for promotion but I understand if you don't feel this enough to qualify for a Wikipedia entry at this time. If this is the case I appreciate your time in looking at this and I will submit it again when the film is released. Thank you. Danielle Kidman ( talk) 16:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielle Kidman ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
OK, many thanks and I truly appreciate your comments. I will attempt to submit this again when more articles and interviews have been done solely on this film. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielle Kidman ( talk • contribs) 19:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. per WP:SNOW œ ™ 22:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Procedural. Disputed prod by original author (and subject of article). Fails to meet adequate notability. The Rambling Man ( talk) 12:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that this does not meet the requirements for a standalone article. I imagine that a redirect to People's Republic of China–South Africa relations would be useful, but that's an editorial decision. The deleted content (which is about two instances in which the Dalai Lama did not get a visa for South Africa) can be restored if somebody really thinks it's important enough to incorporate it into other articles. Sandstein 09:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Article describes a non-occurent relationship. Relations between the dalai lama (a private individual) and South Africa do not equate to relations between Tibet and South Africa. And as the article makes clear, South Africa hasn't even had relations with the dalai lama. Claret Ash 12:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I'm listing this here on behalf of A Sniper who PRODed the article, unaware that an AFD had been started (but incorrectly formed) before. Their concern about the article is that "self-released demo band, non-important, no notoriety (other than two members were hired as musicians for Cynic (band) until one year ago)". SmartSE ( talk) 11:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Not notable enough. » nafSadh did say 09:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Minor shopping centre; no assertion of significance; lack of reliable sources available. [5] Till I Go Home ( talk) 09:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Contested ProD. A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS. MakeSense64 ( talk) 07:31, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Contested ProD. A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS. MakeSense64 ( talk) 07:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No one, except the nominator, advocates deletion of the article. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:47, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to be notable; does not appear to feature on any major charts or the subject of articles from major websites. LF ( talk) 06:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
As tragic as all of this is, this is just routine coverage of a crime and does not meet the relevant inclusion guidelines Mt king (edits) 05:29, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per WP:G3. Eagles 24/7 (C) 06:32, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No references , External Links is provided Buddha Putra - Rahul (Talk) 05:28, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
When considering to close this discussion, it was important to determine the arguments that were completely unsupported by policy, arguments along the lines of I like it and other stuff exists. Petitions and mass keep voting are similarly ineffective, as Wikipedia is not a democracy.
The person's death and the circumstances surrounding that have garned widespread news coverage, and the individual has reached a degree of notoriety for his story. Granted, arguments that his notability is due to one event do gel, and while notability is not temporary it may be worth reevaluating this in the future. However, presently there does not appear to be consensus here to delete the article.
This discussion has been closed as no consensus. L Faraone 08:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Article fails to show notability, mostly focuses on his final pair of videos and his death, and should be deleted per WP:NTEMP ("[I]f reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual.") also see WP:MEMORIAL - TinGrin 04:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Note: we don't keep or delete pages based on people's personal views; to actually contribute to this deletion discusssion, please cite relevant Wikipedia policies. — Jeraphine Gryphon ( talk) 18:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
*"Keep" - why wouldn't this page be kept? There's a wikipage about Bubbles the chimpanzee, but people have an issue with Ben's page. Really? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foghrnleghrn ( talk • contribs) 02:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC) — Foghrnleghrn ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
It was my Mum, who lives in Germany (she doesn't speak much English, doesn't know how to use any of Facebook, Twitter, or other internet things than doing some research and emailing) who told me about an article about a young man who just died (tragically) and who's YouTube video was the most viewed these days...I don't know about you but for me that sounds like an international/worldwide coverage, doesn't it?! And even if that seemingly isn't enough to become 'notable' in the Wikipedia terms for 'Non-Wikipedian' humans, and even if seemingly Ben's large internet followership from all his YouTube subscribers and other internet networks / communities isn't a big enough argument for some here that this young man contributed quite a lot to this world in a positive way...where is the respect and caring humanity towards his family, his peers and all the people who where close to him and for whom these days are already challenging enough - without having to witness a public discussion if Ben is 'worth' an article on Wikipedia or not (as that's what this burns down to at the moment)... Some of you are concerned about 'making Wikipedia a better online Encyclopedia' - yet are not really bothered to make this world a better place, otherwise there wouldn't be such a discussion about if this article should be kept or not! Is it really so difficult instead of going through guidelines (which certainly have their place) looking for negative points which could maybe enable a deletion of an article, to make the shift to a positive attitude and taking a valid piece of contribution and turn it into what it really can be and should be: a reference point for people like me who are doing research on the internet on topics of interest... I don't know who initiated the article originally but I am convinced that given time more and more people who really knew Ben and care about him will be in a position to contribute and turn this article into a valid source of information about someone special and notable. Don't expect family and close friends to be able to write this kind of content so shortly after the event! Give them space, time and the due respect - is that really so difficult?!? There is already a former journalist and parent at Ben's school who would like to contribute to the article and I am sure there will be more valuable resources coming up - they deserve a chance to proof that the guidelines are/will be met. Speaking of which due to this whole incident I had a closer look at the guidelines today as apparently that's what you are going to take more in consideration than any common sense, authentic and from the bottom of their hearts votes: In my opinion WP:BASIC, WP:CREATIVE, WP:ENT (and in the future maybe even WP:ANYBIO) apply to this article. Give the ones who care about Ben and his life/work a chance to create and find reliable content on Wikipedia! Scarlet O'Mara ( talk) 11:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC) — Scarlet O'Mara ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Or how can it be otherwise that there is such an ongoing debate with so many 'keeps' based on the Wikipedia guidelines?!? PS: Thank you for your (weak) keep 'nevertheless' :-) Scarlet O'Mara ( talk) 16:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC) reply
As far as Policy, I wish I knew how to use approved shorthand links to prove the worthiness of Ben's page, as I have come across many statements in policy that support it. When I cick on the links that some have listed for support against keeping this page, I am not convinced that they are proof. Possibly, the Policies are conflicting in this case and need to be reviewed? Also, as I have said before...the community members who have the strongest feelings that Ben's page should be deleted certainly have not taken to heart the other policies about discussion concerning mutual respect and border on bullying. I have also put forth that the deletion process needs to be reviewed. If there is as much confusion as there clearly is on this matter...I believe the Policies need to be looked at, reviewed. Do you think that is fair? An argument for deletion stating that one's Grandmother shoudn't have a page is weak. If Ritchie's Grandmother had 1,700,000 plus results from a "yahoo" search, I imagine he would be on the frontline to keep a page for her. Other arguments for deletion that are extremely troubling compare Ben's story to "puppies" and people who vote Keep to "shrieking meatpuppets." I challenge you to actually research this story, his impact, The mainstream media stories from araound the world...I challenge you to spend some TIME on this before shouting Delete. If you are all about the purity of Policy, then I publicly challenge you to put an open-minded, open-eyed look towards the Policies that this page fall under and actually click the links that people are using as proof. Now, on a personal level: Thousands of Teenagers are risking peer pressure and peer judgement (remember that?) to leave messages to Ben of how he changed their lives and will continue to change their lives in the FUTURE. That they will remember him for years to come and especially on Christmas. You have no right to conclude that they are lying or are exaggerating. thousands of people that fall into other age groups are saying the same things from around the world...that he will be thought of and remembered into the future. Are you the person who decides that they are just full of it? Are you the one to decide that this does not hold a place in Cultural History or does not become "noteworthy"? The mere fact of the numbers on this deletion discussion page is probably proof enough that it means something--that there is something here that is worthy of a place on Wikipedia. If there are ways to measure how many are viewing his page, it would be fair to use that and abide by what the numbers say. That can only happen if this page remains for them to see. Again, on a personal level: Sometimes "Miracles" are not just events that defy medical knowledge as in a movie. Maybe they are not parting of Seas or Burning bushes as heard in the Bible. Maybe, Miracles are smaller and still extremely valuable events where a person takes a different course in their life due to an inspiration. If this happens for tens of thousands of people, possibly millions, that is indeed Noteworthy. It should not matter if you agree, believe, or were there, if you are trying to determine the legitimacy of an event. If it didn't happen to you, it doesn't mean that it didn't happen. I am asking that you clear your head of your own beliefs and look at this situation from that point of view: Is the event, the reaction to the event world-wide, the lasting affect...Is this worthy or not worthy of a page on Wikipedia. If you want numbers, I will post numbers every day. I will post again and again my interpretation of the Policies as they are written. I will remind you over and over of the purpose, as I saw it, explained of Wikipedia. Many others have offered up other pages that hold less importance than Ben's, yet have their permanent place on wikipedia. What troubles me the most is the tenacity in which a very few are trying to have this page deleted...for the sake of some kind of purity of Policy that isn't actually holding any water. These same few are picking apart sentences of others to the point of microscopic attacks on words that aren't even a part of the debate or ANY Policy. Man up, and at least admit that if both sides of the issue can cite Policy that supports their argument...then maybe the Policies are not clear or need to be retooled. In the meantime, there is International support for the importance of this young man named Ben Breedlove. If you would just take a step back and honestly check this out, you will see it is true. It's not right or fair to proclaim "Bleeding heart syndrome" when there is a real event happening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.235.150 ( talk) 17:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC) — 76.235.235.150 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Obviously too soon to make any kind of judgement about this person's impact, and too soon to request that the page be deleted. Time is needed to determine whether Ben Breedlove will be of ongoing interest to other people. So silly to see this debate at this stage. Let's leave the page on Wikipedia for a while -- can't the history of views on this page be logged daily or weekly? Let the numbers speak for themselves after a 6 month period. A Daddd ( talk) 03:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC) — A Daddd ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
How dare someone try to take his wikipedia off. How dare you. His story was so inspiring and eye opening to so many people, he deserves to have a page simply for the fact that he truely did change peoples lives, and that there is significant information to put on his wikipedia, including links to his heart condition that can further educate people in our dumb society. Ive seen stupider wikipedia pages before in my life, this is not one them. --3:03 PM January 2, 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.45.35 ( talk) 20:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC) — 98.209.45.35 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
I will say this post should be kept because on the basis that wikipedia is an encyclopedia site and this is basic bio about Ben — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insaneinnixa ( talk • contribs) 03:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC) — Insaneinnixa ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Teenager makes You Tube videos then dies. Delete. I feel sorry for his family but this is ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.106.54 ( talk) 21:39, 4 January 2012 (UTC) — 92.235.106.54 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
The result was merge to IdeaPad. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. This article is just advertising of an un-notable notebook computer. Not every consumer product is notable enough to get a Wikipedia article.No hits on Google Books for this model, and even the S10 only gets the usual product placements. Wtshymanski ( talk) 04:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This is an unsourced article about a chain of karate schools that gives no reason why that chain is notable. Much of the article is about the history of karate in the U.S. (and name dropping), but no reason is given why the school is notable. Jakejr ( talk) 04:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This article about a martial arts style/organization has no independent sources and my search found no reliable independent sources to support any claims of notability. It may well be there are some in Japanese, but that is beyond my current skills. Jakejr ( talk) 04:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
There's no support for any claims of notability. The sole link, there are no references, is to a short article from a local paper that reads much like an ad. Even that article gives no reason that he's notable. Jakejr ( talk) 04:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This is an unsourced article about a topic of questionable notability. Even the title seems wrong--naadam can refer to any number of Mongolian festivals and the biggest naadam is more like a Mongolian Olympics with lots of events, not just wrestling. I think the article needs reliable sources and a suitable title to remain in WP. Jakejr ( talk) 03:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was SNOW Delete. Lenticel ( talk) 05:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
notability Steinhöfer ( talk) 03:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete under G11. Blatant self-promotion. — Dark 07:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The subject is not notable enough for inclusion. Thekillerpenguin ( talk) 03:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Malformed nomination. SmartSE ( talk) 11:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
unsourced article about a now defunct Myspace band with one "album" of 1000 copies. Also nominated is their eponymous album. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 10:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Mid-level officer notable only for his involvement with Elvis Presley's stint in the army. Clarityfiend ( talk) 02:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
No sources, no verification of notability, references section is bewildering text that doesn't appear to reference anything. ΣΑΠΦ (Sapph) Talk 20:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Non notable software company. The few references this article has do not establish notability, and the text is a mess of blatant advertising speak: "BPC Banking Technologies is a provider of Open System e-payment solutions for the global financial industry. As the developer and distributor of SmartVista—a comprehensive suite of solutions covering every aspect of electronic payments processing — BPC has designed an innovative platform featuring a flexible, scalable, high performance solution." OSborn arf contribs. 02:01, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Notability established ( non-admin closure) Bryce ( talk | contribs) 06:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable hobbyist publication. Not enough sources to substantiate the article beyond their official site. Blurpeace 04:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help) (subscription required) Quote (from Google search summary): "Tyskewicz will defend his record In New York at a national model plane meet to be held June 25 under the auspices of the Universal Model Airplane News."{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help) (subscription required){{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)The result was keep. the consensus is that there are sufficient sources; I make no judgement of my own. But I will say that a full length autobiography or biography is not required for notability DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC) reply
While this person certainly exists, I am unable to find sufficient indicia of notability per wp standards. Others are welcome to try. Created by a 1-article-only SPA. Tagged for notability for two years now. Epeefleche ( talk) 22:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:37, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This software package appears to lack substantial RS coverage. Article lacks refs as well. Epeefleche ( talk) 17:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This lacrosse club lacks significant RS coverage. Note -- there was one by the same name 100 years earlier. Article also has zero refs. Tagged for notability for well over 3 years. Epeefleche ( talk) 17:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
non notable unreleased album, fails WP:NALBUM Gaijin42 ( talk) 17:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I'm sorry Emeraude but "they exist" and "they make a lot of money" is not going to cut it. There needs to be independent coverage. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:47, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable. Zero gnews hits. Tagged for notability for over a year. Epeefleche ( talk) 17:25, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
*Comment Turnover ≠ revenue.
Tigerboy1966 (
talk)
12:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Content of this list is not encyclopedic and the information is already present in OEIS, which is a more appropriate place for this information. Toshio Yamaguchi ( talk) 01:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Kate Gosselin. And delete. Sandstein 11:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I request that this article Twist of Kate be merged. The show has only been mentioned a few times since October 2010 and Kate Plus 8 was cancelled in September of this year. The article itself didn't have much in it either and it had only one source. With this information, I conclude that this article can be merged with Kate Gosselin or Kate Plus 8. Thebirdlover ( talk) 00:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, I see consensus that coverage in local newspapers in not enough. Max Semenik ( talk) 10:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Player who fails WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NCOLLATH. At best, the sources I could find would be considered WP:ROUTINE. Jrcla2 ( talk) 00:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete was a solid player with minimal news coverage apart from game reports. Does not appear to be playing anymore, though, three years after his last game action at Maine. Not notable as a college player IMO and now he's done. Rikster2 ( talk) 18:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC) reply
{{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help)The result was delete. Max Semenik ( talk) 10:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Un-referenced stub article appears to be non-notable OR. Epeefleche ( talk) 17:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Somebody wants to create a St. Patrick's Day for Greeks. A couple brief mentions in a Greek-American newspaper, but I still think this is basically WP:MADEUP.— Chowbok ☠ 17:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. causa sui ( talk) 00:07, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Not finding much to indicate this person is notable; charitable intentions don't obviate the need to demonstrate notability The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 05:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply
{{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help)The result was No consensus. Feel free to renominate this page if it does not qualify Wikipedia standards. Whenaxis about talk contribs 23:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC) Non-admin closure. reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Update - There is an issue with the name of the individual. According to the author the correct spelling is Mark Petersen-Perez, not Mark Peterson-Perez. Rather than complicate the AfD I have moved the article Mark Peterson-Perez to Mark Petersen-Perez. reddogsix ( talk) 16:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Minor activist lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:BIO. The article references appear to be passing mentions of the individual. reddogsix ( talk) 16:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Striken comment and discussion of it
|
---|
|
Collapse Soapboxing by anonymous editor unrelated to AFD discussion
|
---|
|
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I cannot find sufficient rs-supported indicia of notability, per wp standards, for this trumpet player. Others are welcome to try. Tagged for notability for well over three years. Epeefleche ( talk) 22:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Or, at any rate, no consensus for deletion. Consensus is that the problems with the article can be addressed through cleanup. Sandstein 11:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Completely unsourced, rambling, irrelevant list of trivia. Last AFD closed as no consensus due to nobody agreeing on anything in two weeks. Totally fails WP:SALAT, WP:RS. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
While I believe this person exists, and has limited mention in the media, I don't believe it rises to the level required to meet our notability standards. Others are welcome to try to find sufficient RS coverage. Tagged for notability since 2009. Epeefleche ( talk) 22:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply
![]() |
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Extensive unsourced claims of notability (first, popular), tagged for a long time without resolution of concerns about tone and lack of citations. DMacks ( talk) 23:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I cannot find any significant coverage of this person in secondary sources, as required to meet WP:BIO. SmartSE ( talk) 21:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Extended content
|
---|
PUBLICATIONS AIGA American Institute of Graphic Arts, 1999 Page 276: New Urbanity: The Entertainment District in Singapore (Fifty Books and Fifty Covers) Bone Show 2003, Best of New England Design Page 051: Hong Kong: Defining the Edge ART DIRECTORS CLUB OF BOSTON: The Design Show 1985 Page 445: Peabody Museum of Archeology and Ethnology Plant Migration Communications Art Award of Excellence 2002 Page Hong Kong: Defining the Edge DAVID CARTER PUBLISHER American Corporate Identity, 18; David Carter, 2003 Page 113: Freed Arnold Architecture Letterhead Page 114: The Stubbins Associates, Letterhead Page 115: Arz Travel Letterhead Page 116: Nassar Design Letterhead Page 116: Lotus Shipping Company Letterhead Page 118: AAA Letterhead Page 119: Coastal Leasing Letterhead Page 119: Quest Partners Letterhead Page 166: Jeffry Pond Letterhead Page 204: Gresham Palace Building Wrapping HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS American Corporate Identity 19, 2004 Page 99: Rocio Urrquijo Letterhead Page 117: Marcoz Letterhead Page 191: University of Utah Signage Page 211: Leers Weinzapfel Light and Measure Catalogue Page 225: The Stubbins Associates Hospitality Brochure HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS American Corporate Identity 20, 2005 Page 123: Ginsburg Hallowell Stationary Page 163: French Offsett Partners Stationary Page 169: TSA Nevada Stationary HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS American Corporate Identity 21, 2006 Page 253: NOK Foundation, Inc. Logo Page 202: Weidlinger Associates Capabilities Brochure HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Creativity 32, 2003 Page 238: Nassar Design Ribbon Holiday Card Page 298: Nassar Design Stationary Gold Medal HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Creativity 33 David Carter, 2004 Page 149: Mireille Honein Catalogue Page 207: The Stubbins Associates Award Series HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Creativity 34 David Carter, 2005 Page 177: Beirut City Center Book Jacket HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Creativity 35 David Carter, 2006 Page 65: Oh Ah World Day Design Poster Page 70: Unesco Literacy Poster Page 166: Japan Transfer Page 222: Act of Generosity Page 255: Nasar Holiday Card Star HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Creativity 36 David Carter, 2007 Page 164: Baalbeck International Festival Poster Page 214: Extending Modernism in the Monumental City HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS Global Corporate Identity 2, 2005 Page 24: Lotus Shipping Company Logo Page 76: Fevzi gandur Denizcilik A.C Logo Page 115: AAA Atelier des Architectes Associés Stationary Page 200: Lotus Shipping Company Stationary Page 230: Nassar Design Stationary Page 239: Gresham Palace Page 304: Genoa: Making the Space of the City Booklet HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS The Big Book of Business Cards, 2005 Page 268: Nassar Design, Marcoz antiques • decorations, Archives for historical Documentation, Westgate Biological Ltd., Page 269: Brave Heart Fund, NOK Foundation, Thomson French Matsumoto Page 270: Fevzi Gandur Denizcilik, The Stubbins Associates, N2 Consulting HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS The Book of Color, 2003 Page 15: Louise Wegmann Catalogue Page 338: Boston Public Library Mural HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS The Little Book of Layouts, Good Design and Why They Work, 2003 Pages 177, 178, 179: Weidlinger Associates, Inc. Capabilities Brochure old HEARST BOOK INTERNATIONAL The Big Book of Logos, 1999 Page 72 #7: Coastal Leasing Logo Page 73 #14: Elizabeth Gibb Logo HARPER DESIGN AND IMPRINT OF HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS The Big Book New Design Ideas, 2003 Page 169: Harvard Pusey Library Page 249: Ginsburg Hallowell Stationary Page 283: Index GRAPHIC DESIGN: usa AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 1998 Page 223: Projecting Beirut: Harvard Design School (Poster) AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 1999 Page 91: Weidlinger Associates, Inc. (Announcements) Page 104: Singapore Entertainment (Book Covers) Page 150: AAA Stationary (Corporate Identity Program) Page 218: Cosentini (Packaging) AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 2000 Page 87: Sea-Dar (Cards) Page 107: Norman Foster and Partners (Books) Page 170: Lotus Shipping Company (Letterhead Stationary Page 236: Nassar Design Millennium Card (Self-Promotion) AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 2002 Page 84: Leers Weinzapfel Announcement 1st Page 139: Hong Kong Book (Editorial Book Design) Page 146: Louise Wegmann Catalogue (Editorial Design Publications) Page 164: Nassar Design Stationary (Identity Design) Page 165: Elizabeth Gibb (Identity Design) Page 165: Jeffry Pond (Identity Design) AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 2004 Page 180: Theatre at the Pudding Page 225: Weidlinger Associates, Logo Page 301: Genoa Waterfront AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 2005 Page 80: Leers Weinzapfel Recent University Work Page 147: Japan Transfer Page 180: Freed Arnold Stationary) Page 0: Leers Weinzapfel Recent Courthouse Work Page 147: SOLIDERE Page 0: Nassar Design Holiday Card 2005 Page 252: AIGA: World Day of Design Page 270: Nassar Design: Generosity Circles the World AMERICAN GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARDS 2006 1. Nabil Nahas Opium and Candy 2. OBEO Design Logo 3. Washington Modernism 4. NOK Foundation Corporate ID 5. SE FOR INTERIORS Logo 6. Nassar Design Holiday Card GRAPHIS POSTER ANNUAL 2004 Page 20, 21: Genoa Waterfront Posters GRAPHIS LOGO DESIGN 6 2004 Page 140 Coastal Leasing
PRINT Print Regional Design Annual, 2001 Page 287: Ecce Homo Print Regional Design Annual, 2002 Page 288 (187): Louise Wegmann Catalogue Page 288 (187): Hong Kong Book Print Regional Design Annual, 2003 Page 288: Mireille Honeïn Catalogue Print Regional Design Annual, 2006 Page 257: Nabil Nahas Opium and Candy
Letterhead and Logo Design 7, 2001 Sayles Graphic Design Page 83: Nassar Design Stationary Letterhead and Logo Design, 2003 Top Design Studio Page 19: Hybrid Letterhead Page 58: Leers Weinzapfel Letterhead Mastering Materials, Bindings, & Finishes Art of Creative Production by Catharine Fishel 2007 Page 56: Nabil Nahas Catalogue Page 143: Louise Wegmann Fundraising Brochure One-Color Graphics, The Power of Contrast, 2002 Chen Design Associates Page 18: Arnold Freed Architecture (Origins The Core Identity) Page 21: Jorge Silvetti Stationary Page 84: Harvard School of Government Card (Scion Collateral Offspring) Page 140: Nassar Design Millennium Card (Micro An Intimate Impression) Page 155: Hong Kong Book (the Third Dimension). 1000 Graphic Elements Details for Distinctive Design 2004 Wilson Harvey: London Page 69 # 0195: Louise Wegmann Fund-raising brochure Page 149 #0437: Weidlinger Associates, Inc 50th promotional package Page 187 #0573: Nassar Design Peace Ribbon 1000 Greetings Creative Correspondence Designed for all Occasions 2004 Peter King & Company Page 32: Nassar Design Peace Ribbon Page 41: Nassar Design Stationary Page 63: Hybrid Moving Card Page 73: Weidlinger Holiday Card (Structure) Page 76: Sea Dar Holiday Card Page 94: Nassar Design: The Edge of New Beginning Page 115: The Stubbins Associates Holiday Card Page 136: The Stubbins Associates Moving Announcement Page 175: Moustapha Khalidy Exhibition Announcement Page 193: Women in Practice: Landscape in Architecture Announcement Page 245: Contemporary European Landscape Design Announcement Page 260: Hart-Weidlinger Announcement Page 265: L’Habitation au Liban Postcard Page 270: Baalbeck Bookmark Page 276: Leers Weinzapfel College Awards Announcement 1000 Bags, Tags & Labels by Kiki Eldridge 2006 Page 171 entry 0602: Leers Weinzpfel Associates Label Page 251 entry 0859 TSA label Page 251 entry 0860 The Stubbins Associates, Inc. Label Page 259 entry 0889 Nassar Design Label Page 311 Index 1000 Retail Graphics by JGA 2006 Page 123 entry 0404: SE Merchandising Tag Page 203 entry 0690: The Chinese Porcelain Company Bag Page 268: entry 0911: Gresham Palace Construction Banner The Art of Promotion: Creating Distinction Through Innovative Production Techniques 2005 By Lisa L. Cyr Pages 176, 177: Genoa: Posters series The Art of Promotion: Creating Distinction Through Innovative Production Techniques 2003 Lisa L. Cyr Page 76-77: Weidlinger 50th promotional (Unique Construction, Folds, and Die-Cuts) Page 44-45: Hong Kong (Unconventional Surfaces and Printing Techniques) The Best of Brochure Design, 2008 Perry Chua Page 129: Louise Wegmann Brochure The Best of Brochure Design, 2005 Willoughby Design Group Page 42: Louise Wegmann Brochure The Best of Brochure Design 10, 2009 Perry Chua Page: Harvard Graduate School of Design The Best of Business Cards Design 5, 2002 Cheryl Dangel Cullen Page 122: Nassar Design Business card Vellum Page 144: Marcoz The Best of Business Cards Design 6, 2004 Blackcoffee Page 118: Nassar Design Page 130: N-2 Consulting Page 137: Thirty Things Page 165: Joumana Ghandour Page 201: Freed Arnold Architecture The Best of Business Cards Design 6, 2006 Loewy-London Page 156 #283: Nassar Design Business Card Page 162 #295: Rania Matar Photography The Best of Business Cards Design 8, 2008 Sibley Peteet Page 119 #3: Nassar Design Business Card The Little Book of Big Promotions, 2007 By Cheryl Dangel Cullen, Lisa L. Cyr and Lisa Hickey Page 44/45: Defining The Edge Hong Kong Book Page76/77: Weidlinger Origami |
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Usman Masood ( talk • contribs) 22:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that Wikipedia isn't for countries made up one day. Sandstein 09:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Completing an incomplete nomination Reaper Eternal ( talk) 21:14, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
-- Leodescal ( talk) 01:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Bristol Grammar School. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Unsourced school song article, should be merged into Bristol Grammar School Bob Re-born ( talk) 20:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
While this comedy duo does exist, I cannot find sufficient rs coverage to confer notability per wp standards. Tagged for notability and lack of refs for nearly 2 years. Epeefleche ( talk) 19:29, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Can be userfied on request. Sandstein 09:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
no indication of WP:notability. New linux distribution still in early development. No independent sources. Disputed prod. noq ( talk) 17:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Even though there is no indication of WP:notability and even though Cinux is a new linux distribution still in early development, there is no reason why this article should be deleted. There are several entries around the internet, in different forums from people asking what Cinux is. It would be better if there was an article on Wikipedia than answeres around the internet without any liability. If you think this is a poor article, check out Bodhi's Linux article. This one has more information in it. conmarapgr ( conmarapgr) 20:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
That is what I said. Forums are not reliable. That's why I chose Wikipedia to publish an article. The codeplex page you found is not affiliated with the project, the launchpad is and states that clearly. OSArena.net on the other hand has it's own section ( OSArena->OSArena Projects->Cinux). There is a list of several articles that state the affiliation of the project. Google News does not contain news about Cinux but, the project was published on a Greek Magazine called Linux Inside and the owner has written an article twice for the magazine, check it out. conmarapgr ( conmarapgr) 20:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Sundering of the Elves. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Article does not indicate how it meets notability. Only one primary reference is used. GimliDotNet ( talk) 17:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Snow keep. Deletion concerns have been addressed. ( non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Totally unreferenced subject. Written not like an encyclopedia article but like a directory. Stedrick ( talk) 16:35, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NMUSIC. Band put out one album, on a label which appears to have put out just three albums before disappearing. Nat Gertler ( talk) 16:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per WP:G3. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Biography of a minor, originally created by a WP:SPA. Only claim to notability is "is known for the youngest journalist working in ABS-CBN" which is insufficient. Prod removed by a similarly-named new account, so bringing to AfD. Various "references" are basically to versions of the same "interview" published on non- reliable sites. Falls far short of meeting WP:CREATIVE; at best WP:TOOSOON. AllyD ( talk) 15:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Although he plays for fully pro club his only appearance for the club was last season when they were in the Scottish Second Division & therefore fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Topic fails to meet WP:GNG and is filled with WP:OR. Article is almost entirely unreferenced, the only footnote pointing to an anecdote about a television scheduling change not related to either two main topics of the article (WWF/GCW). Google search of "black saturday wrestling" and "black saturday wwf" provides no related coverage of the article subject. Sottolacqua ( talk) 15:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This is a small $25000 ITF tournament, so doesn't meet the tournament notability guidelines used by Wikiproject tennis, see:
Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tennis/Article_guidelines
MakeSense64 (
talk)
08:18, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because [content forks of the main article]:
I am listing this AfD to see how it goes. There are over 400 similar articles for small ITF tournaments, which can be found on this category page: 2011 ITF Women's Circuit. MakeSense64 ( talk) 08:38, 7 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Delete due to lack of notability established through significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Possible hoax. All sources limited to Facebook and talent recruiting sites. Company website is nonexistent. Best regards, Cind. amuse (Cindy) 14:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep Nomination withdrawn based on improvement, no outstanding delete !votes. Jclemens ( talk) 03:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC) reply
A relatively unnoteable actor with no references to pages other than IMDB, an offical website and a Twitter feed. Also there appears to be edit warring, persistent vandalism, page ownership, and a conflict of interest (see edit summary
[1]).
Cocoaguy
ここがいい
05:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
reply
*Delete Zero sources, no indication of wp:notability. Most variants of the article have looked like self-blogging. North8000 (
talk)
15:00, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:49, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
no notability, created himself with sockpuppets Gracioso ( talk) 13:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Userfied to author. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
WP:BALL, also the official website, IMDb and blog entries are not WP:RS. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 13:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Many thanks, I have added further references in the hope that this is not removed. The film is currently being filmed and is registered with the british film council ( http://film.britishcouncil.org/shaniqua) and the Internet Movie Database ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2112262/). If I can add anything else to help the article please let me know. I've also added a link (this is available on various sites) which shows the distribution agreement which was announced in september 2011, ( http://www.metalonrock.tv/frozenecho/pressrelease-25sep2011.pdf). Kind regards Danielle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielle Kidman ( talk • contribs) 13:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I'm suprised that IMDB isn't recognised as a reputable source when it comes to films? I've also attached various interviews and news reports with cast and crew if that assists in keeping the page?
http://www.hertsad.co.uk/news/st_albans_actress_in_starring_film_role_1_1160673 http://fameonline.co.uk/2011/12/local-girl-emma-louise-cargill-makes-it-to-the-big-screen/ http://www.movievine.com/interviews/interview-with-mark-noyce/ http://mattjhorn.wordpress.com/2011/08/22/mark-noyce-on-the-ropes-2011/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielle Kidman ( talk • contribs) 14:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
I totally agree that many films 'say' they are being made and never see the light of day so understand your concerns, but this is being talked about in various interviews, news pages and I've also linked to the official press release from cornerstone media international who are the distributors. None of these are the efforts of people 'responsible' for promotion but I understand if you don't feel this enough to qualify for a Wikipedia entry at this time. If this is the case I appreciate your time in looking at this and I will submit it again when the film is released. Thank you. Danielle Kidman ( talk) 16:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielle Kidman ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
OK, many thanks and I truly appreciate your comments. I will attempt to submit this again when more articles and interviews have been done solely on this film. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielle Kidman ( talk • contribs) 19:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. per WP:SNOW œ ™ 22:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Procedural. Disputed prod by original author (and subject of article). Fails to meet adequate notability. The Rambling Man ( talk) 12:50, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that this does not meet the requirements for a standalone article. I imagine that a redirect to People's Republic of China–South Africa relations would be useful, but that's an editorial decision. The deleted content (which is about two instances in which the Dalai Lama did not get a visa for South Africa) can be restored if somebody really thinks it's important enough to incorporate it into other articles. Sandstein 09:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Article describes a non-occurent relationship. Relations between the dalai lama (a private individual) and South Africa do not equate to relations between Tibet and South Africa. And as the article makes clear, South Africa hasn't even had relations with the dalai lama. Claret Ash 12:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:07, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I'm listing this here on behalf of A Sniper who PRODed the article, unaware that an AFD had been started (but incorrectly formed) before. Their concern about the article is that "self-released demo band, non-important, no notoriety (other than two members were hired as musicians for Cynic (band) until one year ago)". SmartSE ( talk) 11:59, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Not notable enough. » nafSadh did say 09:58, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Minor shopping centre; no assertion of significance; lack of reliable sources available. [5] Till I Go Home ( talk) 09:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Contested ProD. A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS. MakeSense64 ( talk) 07:31, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Contested ProD. A non notable $25k ITF tournament, below the $35k required by WP:NTENNIS. MakeSense64 ( talk) 07:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No one, except the nominator, advocates deletion of the article. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:47, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to be notable; does not appear to feature on any major charts or the subject of articles from major websites. LF ( talk) 06:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
As tragic as all of this is, this is just routine coverage of a crime and does not meet the relevant inclusion guidelines Mt king (edits) 05:29, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per WP:G3. Eagles 24/7 (C) 06:32, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
No references , External Links is provided Buddha Putra - Rahul (Talk) 05:28, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
When considering to close this discussion, it was important to determine the arguments that were completely unsupported by policy, arguments along the lines of I like it and other stuff exists. Petitions and mass keep voting are similarly ineffective, as Wikipedia is not a democracy.
The person's death and the circumstances surrounding that have garned widespread news coverage, and the individual has reached a degree of notoriety for his story. Granted, arguments that his notability is due to one event do gel, and while notability is not temporary it may be worth reevaluating this in the future. However, presently there does not appear to be consensus here to delete the article.
This discussion has been closed as no consensus. L Faraone 08:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Article fails to show notability, mostly focuses on his final pair of videos and his death, and should be deleted per WP:NTEMP ("[I]f reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual.") also see WP:MEMORIAL - TinGrin 04:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Note: we don't keep or delete pages based on people's personal views; to actually contribute to this deletion discusssion, please cite relevant Wikipedia policies. — Jeraphine Gryphon ( talk) 18:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
*"Keep" - why wouldn't this page be kept? There's a wikipage about Bubbles the chimpanzee, but people have an issue with Ben's page. Really? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Foghrnleghrn ( talk • contribs) 02:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC) — Foghrnleghrn ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
It was my Mum, who lives in Germany (she doesn't speak much English, doesn't know how to use any of Facebook, Twitter, or other internet things than doing some research and emailing) who told me about an article about a young man who just died (tragically) and who's YouTube video was the most viewed these days...I don't know about you but for me that sounds like an international/worldwide coverage, doesn't it?! And even if that seemingly isn't enough to become 'notable' in the Wikipedia terms for 'Non-Wikipedian' humans, and even if seemingly Ben's large internet followership from all his YouTube subscribers and other internet networks / communities isn't a big enough argument for some here that this young man contributed quite a lot to this world in a positive way...where is the respect and caring humanity towards his family, his peers and all the people who where close to him and for whom these days are already challenging enough - without having to witness a public discussion if Ben is 'worth' an article on Wikipedia or not (as that's what this burns down to at the moment)... Some of you are concerned about 'making Wikipedia a better online Encyclopedia' - yet are not really bothered to make this world a better place, otherwise there wouldn't be such a discussion about if this article should be kept or not! Is it really so difficult instead of going through guidelines (which certainly have their place) looking for negative points which could maybe enable a deletion of an article, to make the shift to a positive attitude and taking a valid piece of contribution and turn it into what it really can be and should be: a reference point for people like me who are doing research on the internet on topics of interest... I don't know who initiated the article originally but I am convinced that given time more and more people who really knew Ben and care about him will be in a position to contribute and turn this article into a valid source of information about someone special and notable. Don't expect family and close friends to be able to write this kind of content so shortly after the event! Give them space, time and the due respect - is that really so difficult?!? There is already a former journalist and parent at Ben's school who would like to contribute to the article and I am sure there will be more valuable resources coming up - they deserve a chance to proof that the guidelines are/will be met. Speaking of which due to this whole incident I had a closer look at the guidelines today as apparently that's what you are going to take more in consideration than any common sense, authentic and from the bottom of their hearts votes: In my opinion WP:BASIC, WP:CREATIVE, WP:ENT (and in the future maybe even WP:ANYBIO) apply to this article. Give the ones who care about Ben and his life/work a chance to create and find reliable content on Wikipedia! Scarlet O'Mara ( talk) 11:47, 1 January 2012 (UTC) — Scarlet O'Mara ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Or how can it be otherwise that there is such an ongoing debate with so many 'keeps' based on the Wikipedia guidelines?!? PS: Thank you for your (weak) keep 'nevertheless' :-) Scarlet O'Mara ( talk) 16:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC) reply
As far as Policy, I wish I knew how to use approved shorthand links to prove the worthiness of Ben's page, as I have come across many statements in policy that support it. When I cick on the links that some have listed for support against keeping this page, I am not convinced that they are proof. Possibly, the Policies are conflicting in this case and need to be reviewed? Also, as I have said before...the community members who have the strongest feelings that Ben's page should be deleted certainly have not taken to heart the other policies about discussion concerning mutual respect and border on bullying. I have also put forth that the deletion process needs to be reviewed. If there is as much confusion as there clearly is on this matter...I believe the Policies need to be looked at, reviewed. Do you think that is fair? An argument for deletion stating that one's Grandmother shoudn't have a page is weak. If Ritchie's Grandmother had 1,700,000 plus results from a "yahoo" search, I imagine he would be on the frontline to keep a page for her. Other arguments for deletion that are extremely troubling compare Ben's story to "puppies" and people who vote Keep to "shrieking meatpuppets." I challenge you to actually research this story, his impact, The mainstream media stories from araound the world...I challenge you to spend some TIME on this before shouting Delete. If you are all about the purity of Policy, then I publicly challenge you to put an open-minded, open-eyed look towards the Policies that this page fall under and actually click the links that people are using as proof. Now, on a personal level: Thousands of Teenagers are risking peer pressure and peer judgement (remember that?) to leave messages to Ben of how he changed their lives and will continue to change their lives in the FUTURE. That they will remember him for years to come and especially on Christmas. You have no right to conclude that they are lying or are exaggerating. thousands of people that fall into other age groups are saying the same things from around the world...that he will be thought of and remembered into the future. Are you the person who decides that they are just full of it? Are you the one to decide that this does not hold a place in Cultural History or does not become "noteworthy"? The mere fact of the numbers on this deletion discussion page is probably proof enough that it means something--that there is something here that is worthy of a place on Wikipedia. If there are ways to measure how many are viewing his page, it would be fair to use that and abide by what the numbers say. That can only happen if this page remains for them to see. Again, on a personal level: Sometimes "Miracles" are not just events that defy medical knowledge as in a movie. Maybe they are not parting of Seas or Burning bushes as heard in the Bible. Maybe, Miracles are smaller and still extremely valuable events where a person takes a different course in their life due to an inspiration. If this happens for tens of thousands of people, possibly millions, that is indeed Noteworthy. It should not matter if you agree, believe, or were there, if you are trying to determine the legitimacy of an event. If it didn't happen to you, it doesn't mean that it didn't happen. I am asking that you clear your head of your own beliefs and look at this situation from that point of view: Is the event, the reaction to the event world-wide, the lasting affect...Is this worthy or not worthy of a page on Wikipedia. If you want numbers, I will post numbers every day. I will post again and again my interpretation of the Policies as they are written. I will remind you over and over of the purpose, as I saw it, explained of Wikipedia. Many others have offered up other pages that hold less importance than Ben's, yet have their permanent place on wikipedia. What troubles me the most is the tenacity in which a very few are trying to have this page deleted...for the sake of some kind of purity of Policy that isn't actually holding any water. These same few are picking apart sentences of others to the point of microscopic attacks on words that aren't even a part of the debate or ANY Policy. Man up, and at least admit that if both sides of the issue can cite Policy that supports their argument...then maybe the Policies are not clear or need to be retooled. In the meantime, there is International support for the importance of this young man named Ben Breedlove. If you would just take a step back and honestly check this out, you will see it is true. It's not right or fair to proclaim "Bleeding heart syndrome" when there is a real event happening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.235.150 ( talk) 17:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC) — 76.235.235.150 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Obviously too soon to make any kind of judgement about this person's impact, and too soon to request that the page be deleted. Time is needed to determine whether Ben Breedlove will be of ongoing interest to other people. So silly to see this debate at this stage. Let's leave the page on Wikipedia for a while -- can't the history of views on this page be logged daily or weekly? Let the numbers speak for themselves after a 6 month period. A Daddd ( talk) 03:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC) — A Daddd ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
How dare someone try to take his wikipedia off. How dare you. His story was so inspiring and eye opening to so many people, he deserves to have a page simply for the fact that he truely did change peoples lives, and that there is significant information to put on his wikipedia, including links to his heart condition that can further educate people in our dumb society. Ive seen stupider wikipedia pages before in my life, this is not one them. --3:03 PM January 2, 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.45.35 ( talk) 20:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC) — 98.209.45.35 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
I will say this post should be kept because on the basis that wikipedia is an encyclopedia site and this is basic bio about Ben — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insaneinnixa ( talk • contribs) 03:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC) — Insaneinnixa ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Teenager makes You Tube videos then dies. Delete. I feel sorry for his family but this is ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.106.54 ( talk) 21:39, 4 January 2012 (UTC) — 92.235.106.54 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
The result was merge to IdeaPad. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. This article is just advertising of an un-notable notebook computer. Not every consumer product is notable enough to get a Wikipedia article.No hits on Google Books for this model, and even the S10 only gets the usual product placements. Wtshymanski ( talk) 04:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This is an unsourced article about a chain of karate schools that gives no reason why that chain is notable. Much of the article is about the history of karate in the U.S. (and name dropping), but no reason is given why the school is notable. Jakejr ( talk) 04:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This article about a martial arts style/organization has no independent sources and my search found no reliable independent sources to support any claims of notability. It may well be there are some in Japanese, but that is beyond my current skills. Jakejr ( talk) 04:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per consensus and as an unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
There's no support for any claims of notability. The sole link, there are no references, is to a short article from a local paper that reads much like an ad. Even that article gives no reason that he's notable. Jakejr ( talk) 04:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This is an unsourced article about a topic of questionable notability. Even the title seems wrong--naadam can refer to any number of Mongolian festivals and the biggest naadam is more like a Mongolian Olympics with lots of events, not just wrestling. I think the article needs reliable sources and a suitable title to remain in WP. Jakejr ( talk) 03:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was SNOW Delete. Lenticel ( talk) 05:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
notability Steinhöfer ( talk) 03:42, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete under G11. Blatant self-promotion. — Dark 07:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The subject is not notable enough for inclusion. Thekillerpenguin ( talk) 03:38, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Malformed nomination. SmartSE ( talk) 11:52, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
unsourced article about a now defunct Myspace band with one "album" of 1000 copies. Also nominated is their eponymous album. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 10:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Mid-level officer notable only for his involvement with Elvis Presley's stint in the army. Clarityfiend ( talk) 02:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:30, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
No sources, no verification of notability, references section is bewildering text that doesn't appear to reference anything. ΣΑΠΦ (Sapph) Talk 20:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Non notable software company. The few references this article has do not establish notability, and the text is a mess of blatant advertising speak: "BPC Banking Technologies is a provider of Open System e-payment solutions for the global financial industry. As the developer and distributor of SmartVista—a comprehensive suite of solutions covering every aspect of electronic payments processing — BPC has designed an innovative platform featuring a flexible, scalable, high performance solution." OSborn arf contribs. 02:01, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Notability established ( non-admin closure) Bryce ( talk | contribs) 06:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable hobbyist publication. Not enough sources to substantiate the article beyond their official site. Blurpeace 04:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC) reply
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help) (subscription required) Quote (from Google search summary): "Tyskewicz will defend his record In New York at a national model plane meet to be held June 25 under the auspices of the Universal Model Airplane News."{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help) (subscription required){{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)The result was keep. the consensus is that there are sufficient sources; I make no judgement of my own. But I will say that a full length autobiography or biography is not required for notability DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC) reply
While this person certainly exists, I am unable to find sufficient indicia of notability per wp standards. Others are welcome to try. Created by a 1-article-only SPA. Tagged for notability for two years now. Epeefleche ( talk) 22:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:37, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This software package appears to lack substantial RS coverage. Article lacks refs as well. Epeefleche ( talk) 17:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
This lacrosse club lacks significant RS coverage. Note -- there was one by the same name 100 years earlier. Article also has zero refs. Tagged for notability for well over 3 years. Epeefleche ( talk) 17:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:39, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
non notable unreleased album, fails WP:NALBUM Gaijin42 ( talk) 17:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I'm sorry Emeraude but "they exist" and "they make a lot of money" is not going to cut it. There needs to be independent coverage. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:47, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable. Zero gnews hits. Tagged for notability for over a year. Epeefleche ( talk) 17:25, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
*Comment Turnover ≠ revenue.
Tigerboy1966 (
talk)
12:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Content of this list is not encyclopedic and the information is already present in OEIS, which is a more appropriate place for this information. Toshio Yamaguchi ( talk) 01:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Kate Gosselin. And delete. Sandstein 11:39, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I request that this article Twist of Kate be merged. The show has only been mentioned a few times since October 2010 and Kate Plus 8 was cancelled in September of this year. The article itself didn't have much in it either and it had only one source. With this information, I conclude that this article can be merged with Kate Gosselin or Kate Plus 8. Thebirdlover ( talk) 00:49, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, I see consensus that coverage in local newspapers in not enough. Max Semenik ( talk) 10:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Player who fails WP:NBASKETBALL and WP:NCOLLATH. At best, the sources I could find would be considered WP:ROUTINE. Jrcla2 ( talk) 00:30, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Delete was a solid player with minimal news coverage apart from game reports. Does not appear to be playing anymore, though, three years after his last game action at Maine. Not notable as a college player IMO and now he's done. Rikster2 ( talk) 18:06, 1 January 2012 (UTC) reply
{{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help)The result was delete. Max Semenik ( talk) 10:13, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Un-referenced stub article appears to be non-notable OR. Epeefleche ( talk) 17:22, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Somebody wants to create a St. Patrick's Day for Greeks. A couple brief mentions in a Greek-American newspaper, but I still think this is basically WP:MADEUP.— Chowbok ☠ 17:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. causa sui ( talk) 00:07, 31 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Not finding much to indicate this person is notable; charitable intentions don't obviate the need to demonstrate notability The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 05:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply
{{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help){{
cite web}}
: External link in |publisher=
(
help)The result was No consensus. Feel free to renominate this page if it does not qualify Wikipedia standards. Whenaxis about talk contribs 23:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC) Non-admin closure. reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Update - There is an issue with the name of the individual. According to the author the correct spelling is Mark Petersen-Perez, not Mark Peterson-Perez. Rather than complicate the AfD I have moved the article Mark Peterson-Perez to Mark Petersen-Perez. reddogsix ( talk) 16:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Minor activist lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:BIO. The article references appear to be passing mentions of the individual. reddogsix ( talk) 16:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Striken comment and discussion of it
|
---|
|
Collapse Soapboxing by anonymous editor unrelated to AFD discussion
|
---|
|
The result was delete. L Faraone 00:09, 9 January 2012 (UTC) reply
I cannot find sufficient rs-supported indicia of notability, per wp standards, for this trumpet player. Others are welcome to try. Tagged for notability for well over three years. Epeefleche ( talk) 22:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Or, at any rate, no consensus for deletion. Consensus is that the problems with the article can be addressed through cleanup. Sandstein 11:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC) reply
Completely unsourced, rambling, irrelevant list of trivia. Last AFD closed as no consensus due to nobody agreeing on anything in two weeks. Totally fails WP:SALAT, WP:RS. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 03:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:59, 6 January 2012 (UTC) reply
While I believe this person exists, and has limited mention in the media, I don't believe it rises to the level required to meet our notability standards. Others are welcome to try to find sufficient RS coverage. Tagged for notability since 2009. Epeefleche ( talk) 22:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC) reply