The result was delete. Shimeru ( talk) 20:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Article about a non-notable company, created by an account associated with the company. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. RL0919 ( talk) 23:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. There seem to be a number of possible outcomes here, especially as there are two possible communities referred to. Best to close this as NC for the time being to allow further discussion to continue without precluding a further AfD in the future. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
No references, a population of 100? And is considered part of another community Whenaxis ( talk) 22:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
No references, no significant and notable areas within community Whenaxis ( talk) 22:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The first book is borderline, but this one clearly fails WP:BK as pointed out. Debatable how notable the author is? Black Kite (t) (c) 00:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (books). Author is not notable. WP:CRYSTAL. Re-create it if it sells enough. Triwbe ( talk) 22:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
quite simply, it doesn't exist. There's no such thing as a "Dictionary of Bangladeshi Poetry"; this is simply an advocacy page for the creation of such a document. Ironholds ( talk) 21:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete - A3 ("Article has no meaningful, substantive content"). Non admin closure ( pure housekeeping) -- sk8er5000 yeah? 21:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable musician. Speedily deleted 3 times, recreated in substantially the same form for the 4th time, recommend delete and salt. GregJackP ( talk) 21:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Shimeru ( talk) 20:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The first AfD ended with no consensus simply because only one editor contributed to the discussion after two relistings. I outlined the history of the article in more detail on the last nomination, but in hopes that a shorter explanation will entice more editors to contribute to this discussion, I will simply state the key issue: Wykked Wytch fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musical ensembles. Neelix ( talk) 21:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep The article is not very good, and seems to be "making the case" rather than providing interesting or informative content, or providing references to support wp:GNG or wp:music criteria #1compliance. However, unless the statements contained are brazen lies (which I doubt)they indicate high likelyhood of the band meeting wp:GNG and wp:music #1. Given this high likelyhood of compliance, give the editors a few months to get this article in better shape with respect to the above... it could be given an AFD test at that time. North8000 ( talk) 00:59, 12 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Non-notable album (not charted) from non-notable band (no entry on the actual band, though some of the members formed a later band). GregJackP ( talk) 20:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Shimeru ( talk) 20:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Armorial_of_the_Communes_of_Nord-1_(A-C) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD • AfD statistics)
Also nominated:
The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 16:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The only secondary source provided is a forum post, which is not a reliable source. A Google Books search does show it mentioned in "Archipelagoes: Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases", but be aware that this cites Wikipedia as a source, so again not usable. Web search shows the usual directory entries and self-published works. Marasmusine ( talk) 19:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There is no such thing as "partial" notability or partial compliance to both meeting retention. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 16:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete - Article whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline, see especially WP:BIO and Wikipedia:Notability_(academics).
The result was speedy delete (done by R'n'B) as G3 (Blatant hoax) - Non admin closure ( Pure househeeping) -- sk8er5000 yeah? 22:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
I brought this because an IP removed the prod. The reason is ..notability.., I would have to say notability is premature in this case and utterly unverifiable. No links on google. 20th century fox shows no listing under future releases (which lists movies up to november). this article should be deleted. If its real.. someone else will re-add it with sourced accurate info as the production moves forward. I do want to point out that IMDB does show a 3D Alvin and the Chipmunks in development for release in 2011 and that all. there is almost no other info even on IMDB (and the movie is supposed to be released in a matter of days) and not even the name of the article cannot be verified. Also the original poster has been blocked indefinatly for making fake articles like "Reasons why Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia Sucks". Tracer9999 ( talk) 18:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. No argument for deletion presented, article has been redirected per WP:BAND.
I recommend a redirect to Buckcherry, his current band. This musician has been associated with several notable people (though not the actor Robert Wagner, as indicated by an incorrect blue link), but there are few verifiable sources to indicate notability on his own. DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 18:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Morris
The result was early close due to blanking. Bearian ( talk) 00:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC) reply
See WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a manual or textbook. &dorno rocks. ( talk) 15:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Football player who has not played at a fully professional level and therefore fails the WP:ATHLETE guideline; also fails WP:N. He appears to play for a French amateur club at present. The prod notice was removed without explanation. I suspect this article (like others) is an advert by an agency. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 15:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
I can only find five hits total for "Kandar Chappargram" on Gogole, two of which are Wikipedia. I can't even verify the existence of this. Guy ( Help!) 14:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Repeatedly recreated article at Chappargramies ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and with repeatedly recreated articles on some of the listed families, by a sockpuppet-using block-evading user. This is a village so nto technically eligible for A7 but there are only 43 Google hits for this place and Google Maps knoweth it not. I don't know if it's a hoax, a local name for somewhere usually known as something else, or just seriously obscure, and the sources in the article don't help. Because there aren't any. See also Kandar Chappargram, whose existence I can't verify. Guy ( Help!) 14:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
No reason to think that this paper published in what seems to be a non-peer-reviewed journal is of any notability -- possibly qualifies as original research Accounting4Taste: talk 14:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I've userfied the article for the requesting author Black Kite (t) (c) 00:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopaedic article about one budget of hundreds of a district council. Reads like a political propaganda piece and doesn't actually give due balance to the overall budget itself. Coatrack article, etc. GTD 14:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Per WP:SALAT, this is an inappropriate topic for a stand-alone list. The list is too broad in scope and, assuming it continues to expand, will become too long to have any value. Moreover, the criteria for films' inclusion in the list are completely subjective; the word "famous" is too vague and open to interpretation. Besides that, this appears to be one user's opinion of which movies are famous enough to be included on this list; this is clearly not encyclopedic and violates WP:OR and WP:NPOV. Finally, please note that (a) this list has been moved by its creator from its original title, List of movies and tv shows on Internet Movie Database, and (b) this article's proposed deletion was contested by its creator. A Stop at Willoughby ( talk) 14:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Schools are always notable, and I do not know much about Indian dialects, but I doubt this string of letters with a number in it corresponds with the foreign name of any school. Blue Rasberry 13:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) A Stop at Willoughby ( talk) 14:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:POLITICIAN, un-notable politician Dlabtot ( talk) 13:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Shimeru ( talk) 21:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Currently hopeless WP:OR and no sources at all but does not meet speedy deletion criteria. Guy ( Help!) 13:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete: Unsourced bio, mostly impossible to read gibberish . Appears to be some sort of machine translation. Marokwitz ( talk) 12:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The only keep that actually adressed this article, instead of all bus route articles, changed to "redirect" on closer examination of the sources available. So among the people discussing this article, and not some general principle, the consensus is clear that it should either be deleted or redirected. Anyone wanting to create redirects after the deletion is free to do so of course. Fram ( talk) 14:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Another non-notable London bus route. This one had been tagged with {{ notability}} and {{ unreferenced}} since May 2009, and a few hours ago both tags were removed in this edit which added some refs but nothing approaching evidence of notability.
Per WP:GNG, notability is established through substantial coverage in reliable sources, and there is no evidence of that for this route.
There is already a List of bus routes in London, so after deletion this title could be re-created as a redirect to the list. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 21:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The assessments there seem pretty shoddy. For example, this comment praises London Buses route 187, but I see no evidence there of notability. Meanwhile, Jeni contested a series of PRODs for West Midlands bus routes for which there was no evidence of notability. If WikiProjects don't follow accepted standards of notability, then editors really do not have valid grounds for complaint that community-wide forums are used to remove non-notable material. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 23:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Ref | Significant coverage? |
Reliable source? |
Independent of the subject? |
---|---|---|---|
http://www.eplates.info/230s.html | Yes | No | Maybe |
TfL Bus tender results | No | Yes | No |
First Group timetable | Maybe | Yes | No |
The result was speedy delete. It has become wholly obvious that this article has no basis in truth. Criterion G3 therefore applies. ~ mazca talk 22:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
A football autobiography. It seems that this person once played for Blackburn Rovers' Under 18s,( [37]) which as far as I can tell, doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE. I can't find anything that verifies that he plays for Leeds United. There are a few casual mentions but I can't see any significant coverage that shows that he meets general notability guidelines. Perhaps someone that knows more about football will find something. Beloved Freak 12:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Shimeru ( talk) 21:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Amalthea 13:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested CSD-A7. IP repeatedly removes CSD tags. Not notable person, reads like a resume. GregJackP ( talk) 12:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn with no calls for deletion. Non-admin closure. Warrah ( talk) 13:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable author. There are sources in the article, but they're either not independent, not in reliable sources (Youtube, a Perth GLBT community newspaper...), or they're minor (a short radio interview on an obscure programme five years ago). I just don't see the sort of independent reliable sources that we'd need to have an article on this fellow. It's not open and shut though, hence bringing it here for further discussion.
Lankiveil (
speak to me) 11:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Withdrawn, somehow The Age link didn't come up when I googled for him, but I agree that that does put him over the line. My original rationale no longer holds so I am withdrawing this nomination (but I will allow someone else to close it for the sake of propriety).
Lankiveil (
speak to me)
12:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC).
reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Whatever this is supposed to be, it has no place here. If this is a real person, then it's an unsourced WP:BLP failing WP:BIO. Quite possibly simply a hoax that's been here for three years. None of the sources pan out, the article initially claimed that "Damien Roberts played the role of Matt Doran in Home and Away", while actually Matt Doran portrayed a character Damien Roberts in that show.
The image that used to be in the article is File:DamianRoberts portrait 20030425.jpg, now transferred to commons, which is actually a woman from uglypeople.com with a beard painted on, and was uploaded and placed in the article by the original creator.
PROD declined three years ago by the uploader, and wasn't followed up. Let's delete it already. Amalthea 10:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This is supposedly a disambiguation page, but not even one of the articles it points to is entitled arbre. The rest of the content is a dictionary definition, and of a non-English word at that. I don't see any reason for the page to exist; without it, typing arbre into "Go" gets you search results, which is probably more useful. Trovatore ( talk) 09:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Someone added the comment "The above is a prank article with no connection to any known ceremony in any known religion or ethnicity." on March 26 at the bottom, and then today blanked the article and replaced it with "I have deleted what was clearly a prank article with no connection to any known ceremony in any known religion or ethnicity". Clearly an editor who doesn't know about AfD, so I've brought it here for them instead. I'm currently neutral myself, because I haven't done any checking yet. -- Boing! said Zebedee 09:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete A7 - Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject, by JzG. Non-admin close. Beloved Freak 12:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
I doubt that publication in a single magazine in a single state is enough to meet WP:BAND Wintonian ( talk) 08:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
? just looks like Artists trying to get their name out, what do you care? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adw151515 ( talk • contribs) 08:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC) — Adw151515 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
The result was nomination withdrawn. The only editor who commented in favour of deletion has changed his !vote to "weak keep", and the nominator has stated that he wishes to withdraw. ( non-admin closure) Intelligent sium 02:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. An attempt it made on the talk page to address the criteria of WP:PROF, but they fail to pass muster. Previous deletion discussions have suggested that Principals of theological colleges are not inherently notable. StAnselm ( talk) 08:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 21:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
If you came here because this was mentioned on
BBC Radio 1, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Contested prod. Reason given for the proposed deletion was "No independent third party sources provided to establish notability". I would agree that there are significant problems. WP:NOTE says "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." This subject doesn't seem to meet that criteria. Of the three referenced web sites, only one is unconnected to the subject and that only includes the subject in a list, it doesn't provide significant coverage. To conclude, I don't think this subject meets the notability criteria and so I think it should be deleted.
I would note that this article, and its proposed deletion has been mentioned on BBC Radio 1 (Hello Scott Mills). Listeners were encouraged to try to campaign against the deletion. For the assistance of anyone unfamiliar with how deletion discussions work on Wikipedia, it is important to realise that they are not simply votes. Ideally anyone participating here should explain their opinion with reference to what the relevant Wikipedia policies say. The admin who closes this discussion won't simply count the votes but will instead make an assessment of the arguments made for and against with reference to Wikipedia policies. Adambro ( talk) 08:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List_of_names_for_the_Biblical_nameless. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This is a blatant POV fork of List of names for the Biblical nameless, after no consensus was reached at Talk:List of names for the Biblical nameless#The Martyrdom of the seven brothers and their mother. StAnselm ( talk) 08:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
OK.. So that we may move forward.. Bernard already said this is acceptable, now does anyone at all object to having a section titled "Catholic books" within the List of names for the Biblical nameless article? If not then we can merge the relevant information into that section and close this as a merge/delete. -- œ ™ 11:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Not a notable person, plus likely a case of WP:AUTO. bender235 ( talk) 07:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
FLOXCOM is a commercial software product. A Google search indicates it is lacking notability. Dolphin51 ( talk) 07:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete as copyright violation. Jafeluv ( talk) 08:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Duplication of existing page, which name is spelled correctly as "NorVal White", unoriginal text apparantly copied from linked NYTimes article Gordito666 ( talk) 06:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 16:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Shimeru ( talk) 21:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:ORG. 1 gnews hit [39]. those wanting to keep must provide evidence of actual indepth coverage not say it's notable. LibStar ( talk) 05:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 JohnCD ( talk) 08:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
PROD removed by author, non-notable author. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 05:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Artwork (album). Black Kite (t) (c) 23:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Per WP:SONG. The song isn't even a single, and doesn't seem notable in the least. The fact that it has a video doesn't make it notable. — Dæ dαlus Contribs 05:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. I would however suggest that Amerique's idea may be the best way forward here. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails the general notability guideline, no significant coverage found. Only one source provided in the article actually mentions the name "Southern Border". TorriTorri( Talk to me!) 03:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
WP:BLP1E, anyone? Ironholds ( talk) 03:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Stuckism in America#herndon. Tone 21:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
After a few days nothing has come to this article and, it must be said, expectedly so: this is the Google search. We are dealing with a non-notable author who has generated no press but has written two books--both of which published by an on-demand press, CreateSpace. Delete. Drmies ( talk) 03:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Doesn't fulfill WP:AUTHOR. Non-notable author with no significant output. Simon-in-sagamihara ( talk) 03:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to 13 Engines. Originally closed by User:Fishhead2100 on 9 April 2010. Reclosing to fix formatting. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources, fails WP:BIO. Contested prod RadioFan ( talk) 03:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Does not meet the general notability guideline. I found no significant coverage of the station. TorriTorri( Talk to me!) 03:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was obvious keep per long-standing precedent of keeping all settlements. Renata ( talk) 14:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Other than the fact that that this village is very old (over 700), I see no reason for it to have it's own page. No sources, no notability, no credibility. Renaissancee (talk) 02:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was SNOW delete see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 California earthquake. Jclemens ( talk) 06:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
WP:CRYSTAL that uses a science-fiction movie as its academic referencing. Warrah ( talk) 02:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Merge This article is supposed to deal with a movie scene from the movie 2012. If it cannot be a standalone article, it should be merged with the main movie title. The same goes with 2012 California earthquake. GVnayR ( talk) 03:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was subject already exists at a more plausible title and the misspelling makes this unsuitable as a redirect
Contested prod. An incomplete and unnecessary list of some Greek deities. Burpelson AFB ( talk) 02:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was SNOW delete Jclemens ( talk) 06:35, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
A shiny example of WP:CRYSTAL that speculates on the possibility of an earthquake in two years. The references cited here do not meet WP:RS requirements. Warrah ( talk) 02:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Merge This article is supposed to deal with a movie scene from the movie 2012. If it cannot be a standalone article, it should be merged with the main movie title. The same goes with 2012 Las Vegas earthquake. GVnayR ( talk) 03:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Since this is an AfD debate, we decide whether to delete or not. A consensus is not to delete. Whether to merge or not, this can be discussed on the talkpage. Tone 21:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:ONEVENT. While the event may be notable, there is no evidence that Chmagh is notable outside this, or that there is enough coverage of him as an individual to justify an article. Ironholds ( talk) 02:29, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted as previously speedied vandalism
Not notable a quick google didn't seem to come up with anything reliable as a source. Wintonian ( talk) 01:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to The Runaways#Laurie McAllister. Shimeru ( talk) 21:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Individual does not appear to be notable outside of a band. Ghits do not produce sources that establish notability. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Article is purely speculative at this point. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 00:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge and redirect per previous consensus. I added an entry for Servicelive.com at Sears Holdings Corporation, using a more recent source. This article will then be redirected to preserve the history. If consensus emerges at Talk:Sears Holdings Corporation that this site doesn't merit inclusion, that works too - but it is operated by Sears and should still redirect there. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Tagged for merge BACK IN MARCH FREAKING 2009 and nobody could be arsed. Use it or lose it. Sources seem too thin to even warrant a merge. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:12, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to The Brittas Empire. Merge can be performed if desired. Shimeru ( talk) 21:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Known for starring in The Brittas Empire, but that's about it, so fails WP:ENT No.1 : significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Appears to have left acting altogether after this one role. MickMacNee ( talk) 14:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Tír na nÓg (band). Redirecting as a personal editorial decision. consider this a no consensus close. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC and this one was only released by a (two?) redlink labels. Only four sources, two of which are Amazon links. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 14:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Zoophilia. Tone 21:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Dicdef, no reliable sources found. Best I could find was this, but even then I doubt it could be more than a dicdef. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Insufficiently notable subject. City council member who does not meet the notability requirements of the WP:GNG. Also see WP:BIO#Politicians, which states, "A politician who has received 'significant press coverage' has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists." [50] This is not the case here. PROD contested, so comes here for deletion. — Satori Son 14:37, 24 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply
I'm not a chess expert but I'd say that a sportsperson of this type would at least have to compete internationally to be notable, for instance in the Chess Olympiad which started during his career. I don't see that this person has. Geschichte ( talk) 11:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Unfinished AFD started by someone else. Simply working with another notable musician != notability. No sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Tone 21:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. No sources found to establish the notability of this film, fails WP:NOTFILM and WP:GNG. — Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 02:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ged UK 07:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
A street busker and church composer that fails WP:MUSIC and general notability guidelines. According to his own self published biography, his highest honors are winning church composition contests, which drew no secondary source coverage that I can find.
Note: Prominent obstetrician with the same name, don't confuse them. Gigs ( talk) 00:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List_of_The_Brittas_Empire_Characters#Linda_Perkin. This appears to be what she is mainly known for; redirect keeps the history so the article can be resurrected if notability is asserted Black Kite (t) (c) 23:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Known for starring in The Brittas Empire, but that's about it, so fails WP:ENT No.1 : significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Other stage and television appearances appear to be minor. MickMacNee ( talk) 14:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List_of_The_Mummy_characters#Alexander_'Alex'_O'Connell (effectively redirect as information is already in target article). I have also moved the redirect and dabbed. Black Kite (t) (c) 22:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This The Mummy character fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters. Neelix ( talk) 23:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List_of_Fair_City_characters. As nothing is sourced, a merge isn't indicated. Any material merged would need to be referenced Black Kite (t) (c) 22:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
No references, no real world info. I can't confirm that the plot is accurate. Magioladitis ( talk) 09:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Merge as usual. An afd for a similar character that ended in deletion only shows the high error rate; it's always worth at least a redirect. DGG ( talk ) 01:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC). reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply
No references, no real world info. I can't confirm that the plot is accurate. Magioladitis ( talk) 09:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Shimeru ( talk) 20:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Article about a non-notable company, created by an account associated with the company. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. RL0919 ( talk) 23:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. There seem to be a number of possible outcomes here, especially as there are two possible communities referred to. Best to close this as NC for the time being to allow further discussion to continue without precluding a further AfD in the future. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
No references, a population of 100? And is considered part of another community Whenaxis ( talk) 22:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
No references, no significant and notable areas within community Whenaxis ( talk) 22:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The first book is borderline, but this one clearly fails WP:BK as pointed out. Debatable how notable the author is? Black Kite (t) (c) 00:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (books). Author is not notable. WP:CRYSTAL. Re-create it if it sells enough. Triwbe ( talk) 22:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
quite simply, it doesn't exist. There's no such thing as a "Dictionary of Bangladeshi Poetry"; this is simply an advocacy page for the creation of such a document. Ironholds ( talk) 21:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete - A3 ("Article has no meaningful, substantive content"). Non admin closure ( pure housekeeping) -- sk8er5000 yeah? 21:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable musician. Speedily deleted 3 times, recreated in substantially the same form for the 4th time, recommend delete and salt. GregJackP ( talk) 21:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Shimeru ( talk) 20:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The first AfD ended with no consensus simply because only one editor contributed to the discussion after two relistings. I outlined the history of the article in more detail on the last nomination, but in hopes that a shorter explanation will entice more editors to contribute to this discussion, I will simply state the key issue: Wykked Wytch fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musical ensembles. Neelix ( talk) 21:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep The article is not very good, and seems to be "making the case" rather than providing interesting or informative content, or providing references to support wp:GNG or wp:music criteria #1compliance. However, unless the statements contained are brazen lies (which I doubt)they indicate high likelyhood of the band meeting wp:GNG and wp:music #1. Given this high likelyhood of compliance, give the editors a few months to get this article in better shape with respect to the above... it could be given an AFD test at that time. North8000 ( talk) 00:59, 12 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Non-notable album (not charted) from non-notable band (no entry on the actual band, though some of the members formed a later band). GregJackP ( talk) 20:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Shimeru ( talk) 20:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Armorial_of_the_Communes_of_Nord-1_(A-C) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View AfD • AfD statistics)
Also nominated:
The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 16:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The only secondary source provided is a forum post, which is not a reliable source. A Google Books search does show it mentioned in "Archipelagoes: Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases", but be aware that this cites Wikipedia as a source, so again not usable. Web search shows the usual directory entries and self-published works. Marasmusine ( talk) 19:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There is no such thing as "partial" notability or partial compliance to both meeting retention. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 16:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete - Article whose subject fails to meet the relevant notability guideline, see especially WP:BIO and Wikipedia:Notability_(academics).
The result was speedy delete (done by R'n'B) as G3 (Blatant hoax) - Non admin closure ( Pure househeeping) -- sk8er5000 yeah? 22:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
I brought this because an IP removed the prod. The reason is ..notability.., I would have to say notability is premature in this case and utterly unverifiable. No links on google. 20th century fox shows no listing under future releases (which lists movies up to november). this article should be deleted. If its real.. someone else will re-add it with sourced accurate info as the production moves forward. I do want to point out that IMDB does show a 3D Alvin and the Chipmunks in development for release in 2011 and that all. there is almost no other info even on IMDB (and the movie is supposed to be released in a matter of days) and not even the name of the article cannot be verified. Also the original poster has been blocked indefinatly for making fake articles like "Reasons why Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia Sucks". Tracer9999 ( talk) 18:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. No argument for deletion presented, article has been redirected per WP:BAND.
I recommend a redirect to Buckcherry, his current band. This musician has been associated with several notable people (though not the actor Robert Wagner, as indicated by an incorrect blue link), but there are few verifiable sources to indicate notability on his own. DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 18:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Morris
The result was early close due to blanking. Bearian ( talk) 00:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC) reply
See WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a manual or textbook. &dorno rocks. ( talk) 15:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Football player who has not played at a fully professional level and therefore fails the WP:ATHLETE guideline; also fails WP:N. He appears to play for a French amateur club at present. The prod notice was removed without explanation. I suspect this article (like others) is an advert by an agency. Jmorrison230582 ( talk) 15:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
I can only find five hits total for "Kandar Chappargram" on Gogole, two of which are Wikipedia. I can't even verify the existence of this. Guy ( Help!) 14:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Repeatedly recreated article at Chappargramies ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and with repeatedly recreated articles on some of the listed families, by a sockpuppet-using block-evading user. This is a village so nto technically eligible for A7 but there are only 43 Google hits for this place and Google Maps knoweth it not. I don't know if it's a hoax, a local name for somewhere usually known as something else, or just seriously obscure, and the sources in the article don't help. Because there aren't any. See also Kandar Chappargram, whose existence I can't verify. Guy ( Help!) 14:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
No reason to think that this paper published in what seems to be a non-peer-reviewed journal is of any notability -- possibly qualifies as original research Accounting4Taste: talk 14:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I've userfied the article for the requesting author Black Kite (t) (c) 00:54, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopaedic article about one budget of hundreds of a district council. Reads like a political propaganda piece and doesn't actually give due balance to the overall budget itself. Coatrack article, etc. GTD 14:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Per WP:SALAT, this is an inappropriate topic for a stand-alone list. The list is too broad in scope and, assuming it continues to expand, will become too long to have any value. Moreover, the criteria for films' inclusion in the list are completely subjective; the word "famous" is too vague and open to interpretation. Besides that, this appears to be one user's opinion of which movies are famous enough to be included on this list; this is clearly not encyclopedic and violates WP:OR and WP:NPOV. Finally, please note that (a) this list has been moved by its creator from its original title, List of movies and tv shows on Internet Movie Database, and (b) this article's proposed deletion was contested by its creator. A Stop at Willoughby ( talk) 14:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:56, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Schools are always notable, and I do not know much about Indian dialects, but I doubt this string of letters with a number in it corresponds with the foreign name of any school. Blue Rasberry 13:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) A Stop at Willoughby ( talk) 14:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:POLITICIAN, un-notable politician Dlabtot ( talk) 13:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Shimeru ( talk) 21:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Currently hopeless WP:OR and no sources at all but does not meet speedy deletion criteria. Guy ( Help!) 13:10, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete: Unsourced bio, mostly impossible to read gibberish . Appears to be some sort of machine translation. Marokwitz ( talk) 12:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. The only keep that actually adressed this article, instead of all bus route articles, changed to "redirect" on closer examination of the sources available. So among the people discussing this article, and not some general principle, the consensus is clear that it should either be deleted or redirected. Anyone wanting to create redirects after the deletion is free to do so of course. Fram ( talk) 14:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Another non-notable London bus route. This one had been tagged with {{ notability}} and {{ unreferenced}} since May 2009, and a few hours ago both tags were removed in this edit which added some refs but nothing approaching evidence of notability.
Per WP:GNG, notability is established through substantial coverage in reliable sources, and there is no evidence of that for this route.
There is already a List of bus routes in London, so after deletion this title could be re-created as a redirect to the list. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 21:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The assessments there seem pretty shoddy. For example, this comment praises London Buses route 187, but I see no evidence there of notability. Meanwhile, Jeni contested a series of PRODs for West Midlands bus routes for which there was no evidence of notability. If WikiProjects don't follow accepted standards of notability, then editors really do not have valid grounds for complaint that community-wide forums are used to remove non-notable material. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 23:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Ref | Significant coverage? |
Reliable source? |
Independent of the subject? |
---|---|---|---|
http://www.eplates.info/230s.html | Yes | No | Maybe |
TfL Bus tender results | No | Yes | No |
First Group timetable | Maybe | Yes | No |
The result was speedy delete. It has become wholly obvious that this article has no basis in truth. Criterion G3 therefore applies. ~ mazca talk 22:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
A football autobiography. It seems that this person once played for Blackburn Rovers' Under 18s,( [37]) which as far as I can tell, doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE. I can't find anything that verifies that he plays for Leeds United. There are a few casual mentions but I can't see any significant coverage that shows that he meets general notability guidelines. Perhaps someone that knows more about football will find something. Beloved Freak 12:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Shimeru ( talk) 21:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete CSD A7. Amalthea 13:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested CSD-A7. IP repeatedly removes CSD tags. Not notable person, reads like a resume. GregJackP ( talk) 12:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn with no calls for deletion. Non-admin closure. Warrah ( talk) 13:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable author. There are sources in the article, but they're either not independent, not in reliable sources (Youtube, a Perth GLBT community newspaper...), or they're minor (a short radio interview on an obscure programme five years ago). I just don't see the sort of independent reliable sources that we'd need to have an article on this fellow. It's not open and shut though, hence bringing it here for further discussion.
Lankiveil (
speak to me) 11:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Withdrawn, somehow The Age link didn't come up when I googled for him, but I agree that that does put him over the line. My original rationale no longer holds so I am withdrawing this nomination (but I will allow someone else to close it for the sake of propriety).
Lankiveil (
speak to me)
12:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC).
reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Whatever this is supposed to be, it has no place here. If this is a real person, then it's an unsourced WP:BLP failing WP:BIO. Quite possibly simply a hoax that's been here for three years. None of the sources pan out, the article initially claimed that "Damien Roberts played the role of Matt Doran in Home and Away", while actually Matt Doran portrayed a character Damien Roberts in that show.
The image that used to be in the article is File:DamianRoberts portrait 20030425.jpg, now transferred to commons, which is actually a woman from uglypeople.com with a beard painted on, and was uploaded and placed in the article by the original creator.
PROD declined three years ago by the uploader, and wasn't followed up. Let's delete it already. Amalthea 10:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This is supposedly a disambiguation page, but not even one of the articles it points to is entitled arbre. The rest of the content is a dictionary definition, and of a non-English word at that. I don't see any reason for the page to exist; without it, typing arbre into "Go" gets you search results, which is probably more useful. Trovatore ( talk) 09:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Someone added the comment "The above is a prank article with no connection to any known ceremony in any known religion or ethnicity." on March 26 at the bottom, and then today blanked the article and replaced it with "I have deleted what was clearly a prank article with no connection to any known ceremony in any known religion or ethnicity". Clearly an editor who doesn't know about AfD, so I've brought it here for them instead. I'm currently neutral myself, because I haven't done any checking yet. -- Boing! said Zebedee 09:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete A7 - Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject, by JzG. Non-admin close. Beloved Freak 12:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
I doubt that publication in a single magazine in a single state is enough to meet WP:BAND Wintonian ( talk) 08:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
? just looks like Artists trying to get their name out, what do you care? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adw151515 ( talk • contribs) 08:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC) — Adw151515 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
The result was nomination withdrawn. The only editor who commented in favour of deletion has changed his !vote to "weak keep", and the nominator has stated that he wishes to withdraw. ( non-admin closure) Intelligent sium 02:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. An attempt it made on the talk page to address the criteria of WP:PROF, but they fail to pass muster. Previous deletion discussions have suggested that Principals of theological colleges are not inherently notable. StAnselm ( talk) 08:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 21:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
If you came here because this was mentioned on
BBC Radio 1, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Contested prod. Reason given for the proposed deletion was "No independent third party sources provided to establish notability". I would agree that there are significant problems. WP:NOTE says "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." This subject doesn't seem to meet that criteria. Of the three referenced web sites, only one is unconnected to the subject and that only includes the subject in a list, it doesn't provide significant coverage. To conclude, I don't think this subject meets the notability criteria and so I think it should be deleted.
I would note that this article, and its proposed deletion has been mentioned on BBC Radio 1 (Hello Scott Mills). Listeners were encouraged to try to campaign against the deletion. For the assistance of anyone unfamiliar with how deletion discussions work on Wikipedia, it is important to realise that they are not simply votes. Ideally anyone participating here should explain their opinion with reference to what the relevant Wikipedia policies say. The admin who closes this discussion won't simply count the votes but will instead make an assessment of the arguments made for and against with reference to Wikipedia policies. Adambro ( talk) 08:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List_of_names_for_the_Biblical_nameless. Black Kite (t) (c) 00:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This is a blatant POV fork of List of names for the Biblical nameless, after no consensus was reached at Talk:List of names for the Biblical nameless#The Martyrdom of the seven brothers and their mother. StAnselm ( talk) 08:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
OK.. So that we may move forward.. Bernard already said this is acceptable, now does anyone at all object to having a section titled "Catholic books" within the List of names for the Biblical nameless article? If not then we can merge the relevant information into that section and close this as a merge/delete. -- œ ™ 11:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Not a notable person, plus likely a case of WP:AUTO. bender235 ( talk) 07:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
FLOXCOM is a commercial software product. A Google search indicates it is lacking notability. Dolphin51 ( talk) 07:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete as copyright violation. Jafeluv ( talk) 08:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Duplication of existing page, which name is spelled correctly as "NorVal White", unoriginal text apparantly copied from linked NYTimes article Gordito666 ( talk) 06:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs( talk) 16:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Shimeru ( talk) 21:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:ORG. 1 gnews hit [39]. those wanting to keep must provide evidence of actual indepth coverage not say it's notable. LibStar ( talk) 05:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 JohnCD ( talk) 08:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
PROD removed by author, non-notable author. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 05:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Artwork (album). Black Kite (t) (c) 23:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Per WP:SONG. The song isn't even a single, and doesn't seem notable in the least. The fact that it has a video doesn't make it notable. — Dæ dαlus Contribs 05:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. I would however suggest that Amerique's idea may be the best way forward here. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails the general notability guideline, no significant coverage found. Only one source provided in the article actually mentions the name "Southern Border". TorriTorri( Talk to me!) 03:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
WP:BLP1E, anyone? Ironholds ( talk) 03:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Stuckism in America#herndon. Tone 21:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
After a few days nothing has come to this article and, it must be said, expectedly so: this is the Google search. We are dealing with a non-notable author who has generated no press but has written two books--both of which published by an on-demand press, CreateSpace. Delete. Drmies ( talk) 03:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Doesn't fulfill WP:AUTHOR. Non-notable author with no significant output. Simon-in-sagamihara ( talk) 03:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to 13 Engines. Originally closed by User:Fishhead2100 on 9 April 2010. Reclosing to fix formatting. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources, fails WP:BIO. Contested prod RadioFan ( talk) 03:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Does not meet the general notability guideline. I found no significant coverage of the station. TorriTorri( Talk to me!) 03:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was obvious keep per long-standing precedent of keeping all settlements. Renata ( talk) 14:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Other than the fact that that this village is very old (over 700), I see no reason for it to have it's own page. No sources, no notability, no credibility. Renaissancee (talk) 02:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was SNOW delete see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 California earthquake. Jclemens ( talk) 06:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
WP:CRYSTAL that uses a science-fiction movie as its academic referencing. Warrah ( talk) 02:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Merge This article is supposed to deal with a movie scene from the movie 2012. If it cannot be a standalone article, it should be merged with the main movie title. The same goes with 2012 California earthquake. GVnayR ( talk) 03:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was subject already exists at a more plausible title and the misspelling makes this unsuitable as a redirect
Contested prod. An incomplete and unnecessary list of some Greek deities. Burpelson AFB ( talk) 02:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was SNOW delete Jclemens ( talk) 06:35, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
A shiny example of WP:CRYSTAL that speculates on the possibility of an earthquake in two years. The references cited here do not meet WP:RS requirements. Warrah ( talk) 02:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Merge This article is supposed to deal with a movie scene from the movie 2012. If it cannot be a standalone article, it should be merged with the main movie title. The same goes with 2012 Las Vegas earthquake. GVnayR ( talk) 03:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Since this is an AfD debate, we decide whether to delete or not. A consensus is not to delete. Whether to merge or not, this can be discussed on the talkpage. Tone 21:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:NOT#NEWS and WP:ONEVENT. While the event may be notable, there is no evidence that Chmagh is notable outside this, or that there is enough coverage of him as an individual to justify an article. Ironholds ( talk) 02:29, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted as previously speedied vandalism
Not notable a quick google didn't seem to come up with anything reliable as a source. Wintonian ( talk) 01:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to The Runaways#Laurie McAllister. Shimeru ( talk) 21:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Individual does not appear to be notable outside of a band. Ghits do not produce sources that establish notability. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Article is purely speculative at this point. ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 00:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge and redirect per previous consensus. I added an entry for Servicelive.com at Sears Holdings Corporation, using a more recent source. This article will then be redirected to preserve the history. If consensus emerges at Talk:Sears Holdings Corporation that this site doesn't merit inclusion, that works too - but it is operated by Sears and should still redirect there. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Tagged for merge BACK IN MARCH FREAKING 2009 and nobody could be arsed. Use it or lose it. Sources seem too thin to even warrant a merge. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:12, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to The Brittas Empire. Merge can be performed if desired. Shimeru ( talk) 21:16, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Known for starring in The Brittas Empire, but that's about it, so fails WP:ENT No.1 : significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Appears to have left acting altogether after this one role. MickMacNee ( talk) 14:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Tír na nÓg (band). Redirecting as a personal editorial decision. consider this a no consensus close. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC and this one was only released by a (two?) redlink labels. Only four sources, two of which are Amazon links. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 14:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Zoophilia. Tone 21:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Dicdef, no reliable sources found. Best I could find was this, but even then I doubt it could be more than a dicdef. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Insufficiently notable subject. City council member who does not meet the notability requirements of the WP:GNG. Also see WP:BIO#Politicians, which states, "A politician who has received 'significant press coverage' has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists." [50] This is not the case here. PROD contested, so comes here for deletion. — Satori Son 14:37, 24 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply
I'm not a chess expert but I'd say that a sportsperson of this type would at least have to compete internationally to be notable, for instance in the Chess Olympiad which started during his career. I don't see that this person has. Geschichte ( talk) 11:00, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Unfinished AFD started by someone else. Simply working with another notable musician != notability. No sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Tone 21:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. No sources found to establish the notability of this film, fails WP:NOTFILM and WP:GNG. — Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 02:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ged UK 07:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
A street busker and church composer that fails WP:MUSIC and general notability guidelines. According to his own self published biography, his highest honors are winning church composition contests, which drew no secondary source coverage that I can find.
Note: Prominent obstetrician with the same name, don't confuse them. Gigs ( talk) 00:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List_of_The_Brittas_Empire_Characters#Linda_Perkin. This appears to be what she is mainly known for; redirect keeps the history so the article can be resurrected if notability is asserted Black Kite (t) (c) 23:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Known for starring in The Brittas Empire, but that's about it, so fails WP:ENT No.1 : significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Other stage and television appearances appear to be minor. MickMacNee ( talk) 14:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List_of_The_Mummy_characters#Alexander_'Alex'_O'Connell (effectively redirect as information is already in target article). I have also moved the redirect and dabbed. Black Kite (t) (c) 22:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This The Mummy character fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters. Neelix ( talk) 23:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List_of_Fair_City_characters. As nothing is sourced, a merge isn't indicated. Any material merged would need to be referenced Black Kite (t) (c) 22:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply
No references, no real world info. I can't confirm that the plot is accurate. Magioladitis ( talk) 09:37, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Merge as usual. An afd for a similar character that ended in deletion only shows the high error rate; it's always worth at least a redirect. DGG ( talk ) 01:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC). reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply
No references, no real world info. I can't confirm that the plot is accurate. Magioladitis ( talk) 09:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply