FACs needing feedback view • | |
---|---|
1914 FA Cup final | Review it now |
Iron Man | Review it now |
Empire of the Sultans | Review it now |
Hello Amerique. Thank you for the welcome, and the references you provided. I'll probably have some questions from time to time, but am limited on how much time I can spend on wikipedia. Feel free to run any ideas past me. Some things I think I am good at are organizing and categorizing information and rewording things to just the essentials. MissionInn.Jim ( talk) 04:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
So since you are intrested in the Inland Empire (California) area, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Inland Empire and join if you like. It is a newly formed wikiproject that I just created. House1090 ( talk) 05:39, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments at Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Wikipedia stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. We appreciate your commitment to "mind the shop" while other Wikipedians are busy working on article content. The non-article areas of Wikipedia are vital for the good of the community, and the work you do there is much appreciated, especially during this campaign while other Wikipedians are busy abstaining from them to work on articles. -- Jayron32. talk. say no to drama 22:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Your even-handed approach and contributions at UCSD are appreciated. Thanks! -- Born2cycle ( talk) 21:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Born2cycle has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Hi Amerique thanks for your contributions to the Greater San Bernardino Area article, but riverside is not in the SB Valley. I tend to believe that Riverside is in the Perris Valley, I just asked User:MissionInn.Jim since he is an expert, if I may say, in the Riverside Area to verify that for me or to see if I am wrong, which I could be. I think Riverside is in the Perris Valley because I read in a Press Enterprise newspaper article stating that the Perris Valley was going to get a new metrolink line, being called the Perris Valley Line, which included Riverside. So I thought I let you know that I am working on a Perris Valley Article for wikipedia, which includeds the cities of Rubidoux, Moreno Valley, Riverside, Perris, and Corona (I may be missing some cities). House1090 ( talk) 22:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
No I was going to add a refrence/source but wikipedia did not let me it told me something about a block or something about the site or something like that. I will try again see what happens if try it for your self so that way you know iI am not makeing it up. House1090 ( talk) 22:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for being a member of
WP:CHICAGO. If you continue to be actively associated with
WP:CHICAGO, please change the date at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members to August 2009, otherwise mark yourself inactive or semi-active. Thank you. Make sure anyone you think is active in the project has signed up on the project page.--
TonyTheTiger (
t/
c/
bio/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:LOTM) 04:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC) |
For the rest of this month we are looking for more candidates to be promoted to Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. We are hoping to bring the list of category members to a total of 50. Either you have participated in past votes and discussions or you have recently signed up to be a part of WP:CHICAGO. In either case, please come visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment where we are determining who to add to the September 1st ballot. Some candidate debates have lingered, but there are many new ones from the project's top 50 according to the Wikipedia:Release Version 0.7. Help us determine which pages to add to the ballot.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 04:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Feel free to come vote at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates for our next Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 01:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:UCLA Bruins Alternate Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 04:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
The Photographer's Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your pictures of the Inland Empire, we needed them. House1090 ( talk) 02:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC) |
Please see my comments at that thread. If you would like help or advice on procedural matters, please do not hesitate to contact me. - 2/0 ( cont.) 20:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
I protected the page and left a note on the talk page, as I'm sure you saw. Please drop me a line if I can be of assistance- unprotecting, warning, blocking, commenting on the WT:CAL or Talk:Inland Empire threads. tedder ( talk) 07:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
I've refactored the header to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California#Handling House1090 and moved the User5 template just below so the section link will work. I'm trying to come up with a solution where the content is improved, and you aren't stuck policing articles for quality. I'm assuming you'd rather be developing articles than arguing with strangers on the internet. I'll try to chime in with my two cents on the IE article's talk in a bit. - Optigan13 ( talk) 10:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh, and [[wikt:Suffer fools gladly|Suffer fools gladly]] will produce a wiktionary interwiki Suffer fools gladly if you didn't know that trick already ( Help:Interwiki linking#Project titles and shortcuts). - Optigan13 ( talk) 10:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
I've posted some more formal wording to this whole arrangement on WT:CAL. Also, I know I said I would try and weigh in on the content, but I've decided it's best if I stay out of the content side of things on IE articles to remain relatively neutral on this in case it requires any escalation. - Optigan13 ( talk) 08:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial The Great Wikipedia Dramaout, you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! JCbot ( talk) 04:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi - if I had the time I would do it...would you be willing to report 68.5.101.139 for 3RR? Enough is enough with the edit war, don't you think? -- SkagitRiverQueen ( talk) 21:44, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
I never thanked for your condolence note last year, but I appreciate it more than I can possibly express. All the best, in friendship. Guettarda ( talk) 16:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cyclops,_1947,_William_Baziotes.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse ( talk) 13:49, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The current
University Collaborations of the Month are Ohio State University & Princess Nora bint Abdul Rahman University |
||
Every month two B-, C- or Start-Class
higher education-related articles are chosen for you to improve.
Be bold! |
Hello Amerique! I'm humbly requesting you help in order to get raise Cal Poly Pomona's main article to good article-status. Thank you. -- Marco Guzman, Jr ( talk) 01:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Could you take a look at Talk:Los Angeles#CSA. House wants a 3rd opinion, it would be great if you could comment. SoCal L.A. ( talk) 03:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm not going to war with you, but I was just wondering why you were removing content from the pages of the articles? You were just reported to AN/I. The thread is here. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 02:39, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:University of California, Santa Cruz/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
I will use the talk page before I add a major comment, if you agree to do the same. Arguing wont get us no where. And I will add a reliable source in the future. House1090 ( talk) 01:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
FYI: In response to your comments I went ahead and created a straw man proposal for the metro area guidelines here. Feel free to peruse and criticize.
-- Mcorazao ( talk) 14:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. Some questions and comments:
BTW, thanks again for taking the time to review so thoroughly. -- Mcorazao ( talk) 00:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: RFC, you haven't structured it in terms of a proposition to support or oppose, etc. I would put it in project space and request comments on whether it should be a guideline. It could still be effective as an essay if it does not gain consensus as a guideline. Amerique dialectics 20:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
FYI: I don't know if you noticed but I went ahead and created Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Conurbation guidelines at the request of one of the other editors. It is for now tagged as simply an essay. -- Mcorazao ( talk) 18:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Csusblogosmall.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to somewhere on your talk page.Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Amerique have to respectfully disagreed with you about the lawsuit. Not quite sure what you mean by "unsubstantiated" but if you mean verifiable, it was cited at an independent legal journal. I also don't think there's any NPOV violation. If you think, non-noteworthy, why don't we open it open for community discussion since that opinions can vary on that. I'm going to check the discussion forum to see what's posted there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donselma ( talk • contribs) 03:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Donselma ( talk) 03:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
hey, i think you're right. just got your message. very good point about plaintiff losing. i thought maybe because of the initial settlement, which suggests he did have a case, but you're messaged has changed my thinking . . . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donselma ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Last fall you indicated that you continue to be active with WP:CHICAGO. If you continue to be active please update your active date at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, we are planning a Chicago Meetup. If you will be able to attend the meetup from 10:30-11:45 a.m. on Saturday May 1, 2010 at the UIC Student Center West, please sign as an indication of your intent.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 04:30, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Amerique, thanks for cleaning up the vandalism from my user page. I really appreciate it. Alanraywiki ( talk) 16:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
The California Star | ||
For your work on Inland Empire-related articles, I award you this star. Thanks for your contributions! TorriTorri( Talk to me!) 03:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC) |
Hello, I am trying to bring WP:WikiProject Theoretical Linguistics back to semi-active status. Toward that end, I have moved all members who have not posted to the project page in the past six months to a section, "Inactive members." If you wish to be active in the project, I hope you will move your name back to the section, "Members." You may also remove your name if you are no longer interested in the project. Thanks, and happy editing, Cnilep ( talk) 17:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
I haven't seen you around Wikipedia much lately, glad to see your edits popping up again! Alanraywiki ( talk) 20:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
I saw you help in California cities. I could use help in Chula Vista article. I want to try to get it to FA before its centennial next year. I know you work mostly in Inland Empire articles but both are kinda close to each other, both are in Southern California. if your not interested its ok. Spongie555 ( talk) 02:21, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 02:09, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
I know the Chula Vista article is a huge mess but the book on Chula Vista's history is coming out soon. But i thought you would be interested in getting Southwestern College (California) to GA? I know its not a University but its the only college in Chula Vista(Unless they agree to make the University of Chula Vista they always talk about) and i saw you work with university articles. Spongie555 ( talk) 05:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
The article California Preparatory College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TorriTorri(
talk/
contribs) 02:40, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The Children's Museum Backstage Pass! - You are invited! | |
---|---|
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis is hosting its second Backstage Pass and its first Edit-a-Thon on Saturday, August 20. The museum is opening its doors to Wikipedians interested in learning about the museum's collection, taking them on a tour of the vast collection before spending the afternoon working with curators to improve articles relating to the Caplan Collection of folk toys and Creative Playthings objects. Please sign up on the event page if you can attend, and if you'd like to participate virtually you can sign up on the Edit-a-Thon page. --- LoriLee ( talk) 15:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |
Great American Wikinic at Pan-Pacific Park | ||
You are invited to the second Great American Wikinic taking place in Pan-Pacific Park, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 23, 2012! Last year's was a blast (see the LA Weekly blog post on it) and we hope we can do better this year. We would love to have you there! — howcheng { chat} 19:45, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite. |
Template:Associated New American Colleges has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. GrapedApe ( talk) 03:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
The article California Preparatory College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TorriTorri(
talk/
contribs) 22:29, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article California Preparatory College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Preparatory College until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TorriTorri( talk/ contribs) 05:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article List of fraternities and sororities at University of California, Santa Barbara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Regards,
James(
talk/
contribs) 08:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
The article Diversity at the University of California, Riverside has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Regards,
James(
talk/
contribs) 02:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fraternities and sororities at University of California, Santa Barbara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fraternities and sororities at University of California, Santa Barbara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, James( talk/ contribs) 17:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:CSUSBCoyotes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 04:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:CSUSB seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Hiello. I ran across an article which is 'not quite there' and fighting for its life at AfD, that I think is notable and salvageable, just needing some insight. The article, Melissa B., is what I refer to. I'm not much of a music article editor, and not sure which sources are considered reliable or not. I noticed you worked in the past on the article of a colleague of hers: Spencer Battiest, and brought it to a presentable status, so I was wondering, if you had the time, if you could give the MB article a run-through and see what improvements could possibly save it. Also, there may be COI involved, so, there's that. Thanks either way. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Zachary Battiest, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me 13:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Amerique. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zachary Battiest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 14:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
I have nominated University of California, Riverside for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ~ HAL 333 21:06, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
The article University of California, Irvine academics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Apparent lack of "academics" pages for other universities. Much of the information would fit fine in the main article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Aramantha (
talk) 18:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Amerique! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:Editors willing to make difficult edits, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 2 years.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:Editors willing to make difficult edits.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oct 31, 1973 (Today Series, "Tuesday") On Kawara.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yann ( talk) 15:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
FACs needing feedback view • | |
---|---|
1914 FA Cup final | Review it now |
Iron Man | Review it now |
Empire of the Sultans | Review it now |
Hello Amerique. Thank you for the welcome, and the references you provided. I'll probably have some questions from time to time, but am limited on how much time I can spend on wikipedia. Feel free to run any ideas past me. Some things I think I am good at are organizing and categorizing information and rewording things to just the essentials. MissionInn.Jim ( talk) 04:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
So since you are intrested in the Inland Empire (California) area, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Inland Empire and join if you like. It is a newly formed wikiproject that I just created. House1090 ( talk) 05:39, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments at Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Wikipedia stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. We appreciate your commitment to "mind the shop" while other Wikipedians are busy working on article content. The non-article areas of Wikipedia are vital for the good of the community, and the work you do there is much appreciated, especially during this campaign while other Wikipedians are busy abstaining from them to work on articles. -- Jayron32. talk. say no to drama 22:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Your even-handed approach and contributions at UCSD are appreciated. Thanks! -- Born2cycle ( talk) 21:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Born2cycle has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Hi Amerique thanks for your contributions to the Greater San Bernardino Area article, but riverside is not in the SB Valley. I tend to believe that Riverside is in the Perris Valley, I just asked User:MissionInn.Jim since he is an expert, if I may say, in the Riverside Area to verify that for me or to see if I am wrong, which I could be. I think Riverside is in the Perris Valley because I read in a Press Enterprise newspaper article stating that the Perris Valley was going to get a new metrolink line, being called the Perris Valley Line, which included Riverside. So I thought I let you know that I am working on a Perris Valley Article for wikipedia, which includeds the cities of Rubidoux, Moreno Valley, Riverside, Perris, and Corona (I may be missing some cities). House1090 ( talk) 22:17, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
No I was going to add a refrence/source but wikipedia did not let me it told me something about a block or something about the site or something like that. I will try again see what happens if try it for your self so that way you know iI am not makeing it up. House1090 ( talk) 22:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for being a member of
WP:CHICAGO. If you continue to be actively associated with
WP:CHICAGO, please change the date at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members to August 2009, otherwise mark yourself inactive or semi-active. Thank you. Make sure anyone you think is active in the project has signed up on the project page.--
TonyTheTiger (
t/
c/
bio/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:LOTM) 04:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC) |
For the rest of this month we are looking for more candidates to be promoted to Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. We are hoping to bring the list of category members to a total of 50. Either you have participated in past votes and discussions or you have recently signed up to be a part of WP:CHICAGO. In either case, please come visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment where we are determining who to add to the September 1st ballot. Some candidate debates have lingered, but there are many new ones from the project's top 50 according to the Wikipedia:Release Version 0.7. Help us determine which pages to add to the ballot.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 04:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Feel free to come vote at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates for our next Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 01:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:UCLA Bruins Alternate Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 04:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
The Photographer's Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your pictures of the Inland Empire, we needed them. House1090 ( talk) 02:35, 6 December 2009 (UTC) |
Please see my comments at that thread. If you would like help or advice on procedural matters, please do not hesitate to contact me. - 2/0 ( cont.) 20:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
I protected the page and left a note on the talk page, as I'm sure you saw. Please drop me a line if I can be of assistance- unprotecting, warning, blocking, commenting on the WT:CAL or Talk:Inland Empire threads. tedder ( talk) 07:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
I've refactored the header to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California#Handling House1090 and moved the User5 template just below so the section link will work. I'm trying to come up with a solution where the content is improved, and you aren't stuck policing articles for quality. I'm assuming you'd rather be developing articles than arguing with strangers on the internet. I'll try to chime in with my two cents on the IE article's talk in a bit. - Optigan13 ( talk) 10:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh, and [[wikt:Suffer fools gladly|Suffer fools gladly]] will produce a wiktionary interwiki Suffer fools gladly if you didn't know that trick already ( Help:Interwiki linking#Project titles and shortcuts). - Optigan13 ( talk) 10:56, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
I've posted some more formal wording to this whole arrangement on WT:CAL. Also, I know I said I would try and weigh in on the content, but I've decided it's best if I stay out of the content side of things on IE articles to remain relatively neutral on this in case it requires any escalation. - Optigan13 ( talk) 08:54, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial The Great Wikipedia Dramaout, you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! JCbot ( talk) 04:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi - if I had the time I would do it...would you be willing to report 68.5.101.139 for 3RR? Enough is enough with the edit war, don't you think? -- SkagitRiverQueen ( talk) 21:44, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
I never thanked for your condolence note last year, but I appreciate it more than I can possibly express. All the best, in friendship. Guettarda ( talk) 16:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cyclops,_1947,_William_Baziotes.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse ( talk) 13:49, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The current
University Collaborations of the Month are Ohio State University & Princess Nora bint Abdul Rahman University |
||
Every month two B-, C- or Start-Class
higher education-related articles are chosen for you to improve.
Be bold! |
Hello Amerique! I'm humbly requesting you help in order to get raise Cal Poly Pomona's main article to good article-status. Thank you. -- Marco Guzman, Jr ( talk) 01:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Could you take a look at Talk:Los Angeles#CSA. House wants a 3rd opinion, it would be great if you could comment. SoCal L.A. ( talk) 03:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm not going to war with you, but I was just wondering why you were removing content from the pages of the articles? You were just reported to AN/I. The thread is here. Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 02:39, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:University of California, Santa Cruz/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 15:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
I will use the talk page before I add a major comment, if you agree to do the same. Arguing wont get us no where. And I will add a reliable source in the future. House1090 ( talk) 01:04, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
FYI: In response to your comments I went ahead and created a straw man proposal for the metro area guidelines here. Feel free to peruse and criticize.
-- Mcorazao ( talk) 14:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. Some questions and comments:
BTW, thanks again for taking the time to review so thoroughly. -- Mcorazao ( talk) 00:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: RFC, you haven't structured it in terms of a proposition to support or oppose, etc. I would put it in project space and request comments on whether it should be a guideline. It could still be effective as an essay if it does not gain consensus as a guideline. Amerique dialectics 20:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
FYI: I don't know if you noticed but I went ahead and created Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Conurbation guidelines at the request of one of the other editors. It is for now tagged as simply an essay. -- Mcorazao ( talk) 18:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Csusblogosmall.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to somewhere on your talk page.Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Amerique have to respectfully disagreed with you about the lawsuit. Not quite sure what you mean by "unsubstantiated" but if you mean verifiable, it was cited at an independent legal journal. I also don't think there's any NPOV violation. If you think, non-noteworthy, why don't we open it open for community discussion since that opinions can vary on that. I'm going to check the discussion forum to see what's posted there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donselma ( talk • contribs) 03:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Donselma ( talk) 03:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
hey, i think you're right. just got your message. very good point about plaintiff losing. i thought maybe because of the initial settlement, which suggests he did have a case, but you're messaged has changed my thinking . . . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donselma ( talk • contribs) 22:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Last fall you indicated that you continue to be active with WP:CHICAGO. If you continue to be active please update your active date at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, we are planning a Chicago Meetup. If you will be able to attend the meetup from 10:30-11:45 a.m. on Saturday May 1, 2010 at the UIC Student Center West, please sign as an indication of your intent.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 04:30, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Amerique, thanks for cleaning up the vandalism from my user page. I really appreciate it. Alanraywiki ( talk) 16:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
The California Star | ||
For your work on Inland Empire-related articles, I award you this star. Thanks for your contributions! TorriTorri( Talk to me!) 03:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC) |
Hello, I am trying to bring WP:WikiProject Theoretical Linguistics back to semi-active status. Toward that end, I have moved all members who have not posted to the project page in the past six months to a section, "Inactive members." If you wish to be active in the project, I hope you will move your name back to the section, "Members." You may also remove your name if you are no longer interested in the project. Thanks, and happy editing, Cnilep ( talk) 17:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
I haven't seen you around Wikipedia much lately, glad to see your edits popping up again! Alanraywiki ( talk) 20:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
I saw you help in California cities. I could use help in Chula Vista article. I want to try to get it to FA before its centennial next year. I know you work mostly in Inland Empire articles but both are kinda close to each other, both are in Southern California. if your not interested its ok. Spongie555 ( talk) 02:21, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
-- Kumioko ( talk) 02:09, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
I know the Chula Vista article is a huge mess but the book on Chula Vista's history is coming out soon. But i thought you would be interested in getting Southwestern College (California) to GA? I know its not a University but its the only college in Chula Vista(Unless they agree to make the University of Chula Vista they always talk about) and i saw you work with university articles. Spongie555 ( talk) 05:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
The article California Preparatory College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TorriTorri(
talk/
contribs) 02:40, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
The Children's Museum Backstage Pass! - You are invited! | |
---|---|
The Children's Museum of Indianapolis is hosting its second Backstage Pass and its first Edit-a-Thon on Saturday, August 20. The museum is opening its doors to Wikipedians interested in learning about the museum's collection, taking them on a tour of the vast collection before spending the afternoon working with curators to improve articles relating to the Caplan Collection of folk toys and Creative Playthings objects. Please sign up on the event page if you can attend, and if you'd like to participate virtually you can sign up on the Edit-a-Thon page. --- LoriLee ( talk) 15:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC) |
Great American Wikinic at Pan-Pacific Park | ||
You are invited to the second Great American Wikinic taking place in Pan-Pacific Park, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 23, 2012! Last year's was a blast (see the LA Weekly blog post on it) and we hope we can do better this year. We would love to have you there! — howcheng { chat} 19:45, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Meetup/LA/Invite. |
Template:Associated New American Colleges has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. GrapedApe ( talk) 03:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
The article California Preparatory College has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TorriTorri(
talk/
contribs) 22:29, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article California Preparatory College is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Preparatory College until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TorriTorri( talk/ contribs) 05:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article List of fraternities and sororities at University of California, Santa Barbara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Regards,
James(
talk/
contribs) 08:11, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
The article Diversity at the University of California, Riverside has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Regards,
James(
talk/
contribs) 02:51, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fraternities and sororities at University of California, Santa Barbara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fraternities and sororities at University of California, Santa Barbara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, James( talk/ contribs) 17:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:CSUSBCoyotes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythe hornetfan (ping me) 04:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:CSUSB seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Hiello. I ran across an article which is 'not quite there' and fighting for its life at AfD, that I think is notable and salvageable, just needing some insight. The article, Melissa B., is what I refer to. I'm not much of a music article editor, and not sure which sources are considered reliable or not. I noticed you worked in the past on the article of a colleague of hers: Spencer Battiest, and brought it to a presentable status, so I was wondering, if you had the time, if you could give the MB article a run-through and see what improvements could possibly save it. Also, there may be COI involved, so, there's that. Thanks either way. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 16:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Zachary Battiest, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me 13:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Amerique. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zachary Battiest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 14:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
I have nominated University of California, Riverside for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ~ HAL 333 21:06, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
The article University of California, Irvine academics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Apparent lack of "academics" pages for other universities. Much of the information would fit fine in the main article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Aramantha (
talk) 18:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Amerique! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:Editors willing to make difficult edits, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 2 years.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:Editors willing to make difficult edits.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oct 31, 1973 (Today Series, "Tuesday") On Kawara.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yann ( talk) 15:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)