The result was delete and convert to a redirect page. TerriersFan 04:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
It is only significant in the fact that it is a cover of Bohemian Rhapsody. It was never released as a single, and therefore probably isn't very famous, it should be deleted. MalwareSmarts 23:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Giant in-universe list of cruft. No verifiable sources to assert its notability. Delete or merge into Franky (One Piece). Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 23:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable clothing manufacturer. A Google test for "'Beija-Flor Jeans' -wikipedia" yields 227 results, which include two hits for their home page and a number of directory listings. These are reflected in the sources listed in the article. The sun article is about "jeans parties," mentioning Beija Flor in passing. The next three are directory listings from different sources, the fifth is an internal press release. The sixth is a directory listing. The only other claim to notability mentioned in the article is their sparking the "jeans party" movement. A Google test for "jeans party" fails to demonstrate that such a thing even exists, let alone that this company was responsible for setting them lose on the world. Consequentially 23:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Indiscriminate information and loosely associated topics. Arnold Schwarzenegger is an actor and also Governor of California... Arthur Conan Doyle was a writer and also a medical doctor. Where's the connection between those two people? They've had other jobs, so what? Original research needed here as only people with another "notable" profession are included, but it isn't clear which professions are notable and which aren't. Saikokira 23:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Centrx→ talk • 02:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Doesn't pass
WP:PORNBIO.
Epbr123 23:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Keep per
Corpx. Just about passes
WP:PORNBIO criteria 1.
Epbr123
12:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. GrooveDog ( talk) ( Review) 01:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Non-admin closure reply
Delete - directory of loosely associated topics. "Oh look, the Eiffel Tower is on my TV!" is not reason for an article listing off every time the tower shows up anywhere. Do not merge any of it into the tower's article. Otto4711 22:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong keep this article should be kept because its intresting and shows diffrent popular culture of the eiffel tower, besides people want to delete articles all the time that are perfectly good, we should keep this article, wikipedia does not have to be perfect in every way, and removing this article would lose a usefull article, just because there are not much sources does not mean its not worth including, so keep it.
Epbr123 08:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
nn college football blog, main claim of notability is that is was mentioned in passing by a San Jose newspaper, which isn't enough for notability. Biggspowd 22:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Aside from the obvious WP:V challenge of proving all of these people actually served in the unit, there is little reason to chronicle people who don't meet WP:N on their own. Also, take into account the maintenance issue. Formerly prodded, prod tag removed by 70.91.192.37. Consequentially 22:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Kurykh 23:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
nn sports blog, alexa is around 3,000,000 and never in top 100,000. A few references, but are indirect and not related to site. Most webpages do not need WP entries. Biggspowd 22:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — TKD:: Talk 22:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
nn internet magazine, alexa is around 6,000,000 and was never in top 100,000. Borderline spam and no showing of notability. Biggspowd 21:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. For something lacking any semblance of reliable sources or notability, merging is not the best option. — TKD:: Talk 22:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable drinking game; see also WP:NFT. Oli Filth 21:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Major problems with WP:BLP and WP:OR: no references or citations is the primary problem. A user on the Talk page admits that the entire article was constructed from personal knowledge and therefore cannot be properly referenced and cited. Google search turns up some passing references to his existence, but nothing like the detail contained in the article. Might not even be notable enough to justify an article. This is somewhat confirmed by the limited number of links to the article from other articles and the nature of those links. SESmith 21:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
nn wrestling event, was not on PPV or television, many other cards of similar attributes have been deleted. Had prod removed by wrestling fanboi. Biggspowd 21:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Page is non-notable as it relies on a website and self-referential books. Page also seems to not follow Wikipedia guidelines in WP:SPAM. I am also answering a challenge made without civility and in bad faith by User:IPSOS found here: [1] Kephera975 21:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Probable hoax - no references, and Google brings up nothing. Oli Filth 20:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
A non notable variation on tag. Wikipedia is not for stuff made up in school. The content shouldn't be merged anywhere unless there are reliable sources detailing this game, which is doubtful Darksun 20:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Completely unreferenced, unwikied vanity page advert for DJ Rossstar. Edits are primarily done by editors which are probably sock-puppets for the DJ with little other interest than in DJ Rossstar (occasionally making edits to other articles to reference DJ Rossstar [2]), and also by the DJ himself [3] (it was necessary for him to create a "DJ Rossstar" account so that he could legally upload his own picture on March 17, the same day Dansaysno put it on the DJ Rossstar bio). ~ JohnnyMrNinja 20:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band (see criteria at WP:MUSIC). Apparently split up in 2003, so no chance it will get any more notable. One band member used to have a bio and that has already been deleted. Savidan 20:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — TKD:: Talk 22:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-Notable athlete - does not meet WP:BIO for athletes having not played in a fully professional league. Contested PROD - no reason for contesting given Mattinbgn/ talk 20:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Sufficient reliable sources have been presented. JoshuaZ 20:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
relies on a website and a newspaper article for notability. There is only one secondary source and it is trivial or incidental at best. Kephera975 19:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
*Keep As the article and references seem fine. Nom seems petty and relies on subjective analysis on the sources, pushing
WP:Good faith to the limit.
Pharmboy
21:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
*delete - no demonstration of notability from independent third-party sources, no verifiability outside of their own writings. I hate bad-faith AfDs and people creating them to make a
WP:POINT, but to tell you the truth, if some witchy person goes and writes a bunch of books, that doesn't make them notable. What makes them notable is independent third-party coverage. If these witchy people are unknown outside of their own friends and readers, they don't go into Wikipedia. I can accept
WP:POINT if it helps identify self-congratulatory spam that needs to be removed from Wikipedia.
AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
14:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Fails to establish notability, and appears to have been created as a coatrack for Ayoub's anti-vaccination views. Sideshow Bob Roberts 19:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as per WP:SNOW. Capitalistroadster 17:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Fairly certain that this is a hoax. Couldn't find any references. Chris 19:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Navou banter 04:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-noteable Polish guy, fails WP:BIO, WP:N blah blah blah. Next! Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Unlikely Angel and add any sourced content there. JoshuaZ 20:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete. Non-noteable TV show which, after some vigirous searching, I can find no sources for. Dolly Parton fan site-possibly. Wikipedia-no. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Completing malformed nom by User:Kephera975 (nomination already existed; moved to proper "2nd nomination"). Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 19:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep for now While Wikipedia is not news and most reality show contestants are not inherently notable, this contestant was a finalist who seems to have created a large amount of press. This is essentially a tentative keep. If her album and other results do not result in any later coverage, this close should not be considered a strong precedent against future AfDs. JoshuaZ 20:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete. Another failed Reality TV contestant. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N etc. Was one of the first to be evicted from the most recent American Idol, he has done nothing noteable before or after her few appearences on the show. The article claims she released an album on iTunes, this is NOT the case. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep. Why should we delete this entry? She was a top 12 Finalist on a show viewed by hundreds of millions, and toured the country with many of the finalists. Even if she is mostly forgotten a year from now, why should we delete it? Should we delete wikipedia entries about silent movies that most people alive have never seen before? No, we should keep this entry.
this should be kept. As of right now they are noteable. andre1010
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Hemlock Martinis 22:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Wang C-H 19:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Withdraw nomination. Admins, please close. -- Wang C-H 15:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, nomination withdrawn. Kusma ( talk) 06:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This article is a definition of a Chinese term; WP:NOT a dictionary. Wang C-H 19:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I withdraw the nomination. Admins, please close. -- Wang C-H 06:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep for now Look people, this isn't very complicated. There's no reason to delete these articles now when they are likely to be much more notable in the future. WP:NOTNEWS may apply later, but it is too early to tell. We aren't talking about someone who made the news because they taught a dog to stand on its hind legs and belch the national anthems of a dozen different countries. Nor are we talking about a reality televsion shown on channel 345.678 at 2 AM. We're talking about a finalist in the most popular reality show in the United States. If in 6 months or a year Glocksen has produced nothing else of note then we should re-examine the matter. I do however note that there are many google news hits and that the article is not very well sourced as it currently stands. I strongly suggest that those who support keeping the article source it to the best of their abilities. JoshuaZ 20:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete. Another failed Reality TV contestant. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N etc. Was the first to be evicted from the most recent American Idol, she has done nothing noteable before or after his few appearences on the show. I checked all of the trustworthy, reliable sites, and none of them say a word about her, or the EP she supposedly released. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedied. android 79 19:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
No references establishing notability. Wang C-H 19:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, All votes were keep and nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. -- JForget 01:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This is the Chinese equivalent of "Main Street" or "Broadway" and so does not deserve an article of its own. Wang C-H 19:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Admins, nomination withdrawn, please close. -- Wang C-H 23:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep for now. Closing logic is the same as that for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Glocksen and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Scarnato. JoshuaZ 20:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
DELETE - This person has done nothing really worth noting in grand scheme of things. he is a moderately good singer but so are thousands of others. That's my opinion anyway. Delete. Another failed Reality TV contestant. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N etc. Was the third to be evicted from the most recent American Idol, he has done nothing noteable before or after his few appearences on the show. Is now a member of a band-however, this band is NOT noteable. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Appears to be spam. Almost solely the work of Hroðgar æ Beocwealm, whose only other major contributions seem to be to George Tinker, the author of the book that is the subject of this article. Hroðgar æ Beocwealm also inserted a link to George Tinker into List of writers from peoples indigenous to the Americas, and hyperlinked a suspiciously prominent mention of the book (added by an anon) in Panentheism to this article. (I suspect that Hroðgar æ Beocwealm may actually be George Tinker himself, but can't prove it.) Finally, the article was prodded back in February but Hroðgar æ Beocwealm de-prodded it. — Hex (❝?!❞) 19:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep for now. Closing logic is the same as that for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Glocksen and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Scarnato. I also suggest that google news hits be used to better source this. JoshuaZ 20:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete. Another failed Reality TV contestant. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N etc. Was the second to be evicted from the most recent American Idol, she has done nothing noteable before or after his few appearences on the show. Hasn't, and isn't planning to, release any music so can't be classed as a singer or musician. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 18:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Stephanie was seen by tens of millions of people, and many recognize the name. Simply because you do not know if she is planning to release an album does not mean that she won't. She is more of a celebrity than many other persons on here. I feel that being a contestant on one of the biggest televisions shows in history justifies her having an article. User:Jameseyx
The result was keep for now. Closing logic is the same as that for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Glocksen and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Scarnato. I also suggest that google news hits be used to better source this. JoshuaZ 21:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete. Another failed Reality TV contestant. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N etc. Was the first to be evicted from the most recent American Idol, he has done nothing noteable before or after his few appearences on the show. Hasn't, and isn't planning to, release any music so can't be classed as a singer or musician. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 18:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by User:The undertow. Non-admin closure. Iain99 08:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not enough context provided to prove notability or even explain the concept. Csphdmoney 18:51, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
It is impossible to understand what this is about without any prior knowledge of the subject. DELETE! Jameseyx 19:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 02:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Csphdmoney 18:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT a dictionary. Csphdmoney 18:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
refers to terms associated with computers. Calgary 19:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was Keep Unanimous keep vote. Even the nom didn't cast the delete vote. non-admin closure.-- JForget 01:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This article is about a group of people ( Boston Red Sox fans) that have absolutely no notability. Ksy92003 (talk) 18:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was transwiki and delete. -- Core desat 07:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Speedy, snowball delete. Where do I start? Fails WP:TRIVIA in the title alone. Fails WP:N also. It's so bad, failing so many guidlines, I don't know what to say. Transwiki to WikiQuote? Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 18:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus (default to keep). Ignoring a couple of "keep" recommendations that don't address relevant policies or guidelines, it seems that there might be enough reliable sources to make this article pass standards; no one contradicted QuagmireDog's find of sources, but, at the same time, there wasn't a strong affirmation that they would be enough. In any event, please expand and source the article appropriately. — TKD:: Talk 22:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Open-source free game based on Tron, makes absolutely no assertions of notability ~ JohnnyMrNinja 17:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 02:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
A nonnotable neologism with limited use, per WP:NEO. Tewfik Talk 17:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This is a stub with notability completely unestablished by what appears to be only self reference to the organization's website. There are no secondary sources here at all. Kephera975 17:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Dying Fetus. No individual notability has been shown, but users are correct that these cases are best handled by merge/redirect to the group. In this case, I didn't see anything substantial that wasn't already in the target article, so just a redirect will suffice. — TKD:: Talk 22:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This is a factoid, not notable enough for article. Had it tagged to merge with Dying Fetus, original author removed tags and then deleted discussion on talk page after just one week. Article wasn't improved or refed in the while. Felt it was better to be here to hash out. Pharmboy 17:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep, cuz, uh, I dunno... IT'S A MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT FROM A SEMINAL DEATH-METAL BAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS ARTICLE IS JUST AS IMPORTANT AS JOHN GALLAGHER'S OR SEAN BEASLEY'S!!!!!!!! Dark Executioner 23:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner reply
68.218.44.10 23:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Festering Rat Corpse 23:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Festering Rat Corpse reply
Cowboy From Hell 666 23:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Cowboy From Hell 666 reply
Death Metal Is The Best Subgenre 23:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Death Metal Is The Best Subgenre reply
Redirect to the main article and merge the content.-- JForget 02:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Oh, okay, let's just delete ALL info about death-metal personell and leave the world without any easily-accessable info whatsoever. Yeah, that makes PERFECT sense. At least I'm trying to enlighten the world, cuz SOME of us might actually want to KNOW ABOUT THEM. Dark Executioner 15:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner reply
You know what, just delete the damn article and get it over with. Forgive me for trying to make Wikipedia's coverage of death-metal personell bigger and more diverse. I completely forgot that it was against the rules. Now, let's just move on with our lives. Dark Executioner 15:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner reply
I'm frustrated cuz I can't find any info on this guy whatsoever. I tried Googling him, it just pulled up stuff about an athelete by the same name. On Dying Fetus' website, it just tells about the circumstances on how he joined the band. I think it said that he's from Boston, but I'd have to double-check. Pharmboy, I'm just sick and tired of all the articles I create being nominated for deletion. It's happened before, but believe me, if I had any acess to info, I'd be glad to put it. I just wanted you to wait a while. Now that we're stuck with this, yeah, I'd have to say that my mind is changed and we should delete the article. If we mention it in the main page, then I guess that's enough. It just seems too dry, if you know what I mean. Oh yeah, if you were born before 1989, then that makes you older than me, but in NO WAY makes you a better metalhead. :-) Dark Executioner 20:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner reply
So, have we reached a verdict, anybody? Dark Executioner 21:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
At best this is a non-notable neologism; Google brings up nothing relevant. At worst, this is a hoax article. Oli Filth 17:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
No external sources, no verifiability, doubtful this would pass WP:BAND, and it probably wouldn't pass WP:N. Creator wasn't a single-purpose account - he/she did also contribute to two other articles on Wikipedia. However, this was the person's first article, thus suggesting WP:VSCA. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Tagged for notability since March 2007. Article says they released 2 CDs, each with a 200-copy run. Unverified article, no sources whatsoever, reads like a bio, band probably even fails WP:BAND, certainly fails WP:LIVING as there are no sources. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep—users have shown that there is source coverage out there. — Deckill er 00:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
1.3 million square foot super-regional mall, not notable otherwise. Super-regionals should be notable, but this one fails WP:RS and WP:V. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 16:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This is odd enough that I wanted to get consensus from the community. There are three separate things discussed here, non of which I think are notable. The first is surfing down a ice or snow covered hill with a tray (lunchroom, what have you). While there is no doubt this goes on, there isn't any indication this is any more notable then using any other object not designed explicitly for sledding. The second item discussed is placing the trays under the wheels of a car to execute an accelerated doughnut. There are no reliable sources that indicate the popularity of this, or if it is indeed tied to the Ghost ride the whip practice as stated in the article. The third thing discussed is surfing behind a car with the tray. This may be the most notable of the three, but again, kids have tied ropes to damn near anything and towed themselves behind cars. There are no sources that indicate this is any more notable then using a sled or a skateboard in a similar manner. I tried to see if there were good places where I could merge this information, but nothing seemed to fit into existing articles and this article is unsourced anyway, so merging would probably be a waste of time. Perhaps the community can find a proper solution, but if not, I wouldn't mind seeing this article go away. CosmicPenguin ( Talk) 16:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Ruddy Hell! It's Harry and Paul. John254 02:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Prod on May 5th, removed same day by page creator. Minor sketch by a character in Ruddy Hell! It's Harry and Paul. No assertion of notability other than a link to YouTube. Propose a redirect to Ruddy Hell! It's Harry and Paul. SilkTork 15:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus for deletion. There appears to be consensus to keep at least the Business First and Washington Business Journal, but the others are not so clear. There seems to be a growing thought that they should be all merged/redirected to American City Business Journals, and if this is the case, please take merge/redirect discussion to the appropriate talk pages. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Local business journal. An nominating all the journals linked off American City Business Journals Improbcat 15:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to be a notable event, written like an advertisement, no external news sources (despite the many refs, they either are for the CSSreboot.com site, or other sites participating in the event: NOT 3rd party news sources). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 15:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete—fails to establish true notability outside of a loose list of appearances. — Deckill er 14:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - random collection of unassociated items which share nothing in common past a mention of greater or lesser triviality to NYU. A list of fictional characters who attemded NYU and a list of TV episodes that mention it or was partially shot there does not constitute an encyclopedia article. Otto4711 14:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. -- Core desat 03:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - a seemingly random collection of fiction set at or near Yale, trivial mentions of Yale, fictional characters who go or want to go to Yale and fiction set at schools which supposedly resemble Yale. A directory of unassociated topics of no encyclopedic value. Otto4711 13:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, reasons for keeping are quite weak and are not from a policy or guideline basis. -- Core desat 07:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - mish-mash collection of times a Coast Guard vehicle or person has appeared in a film combined with times the words "Coast Guard" happens to be mentioned on TV equals directory of loosely associated topics. Tells us nothing about the Coast Guard or the fiction from which the trivial references are drawn. Otto4711 13:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This is absolute bollocks. Nothing has been announced, ridiculously crystal ball. By the same editor who bought us Call of Duty 5. What next? The Passion of the Christ 2: Rapture? Quake 5? - hahnch e n 12:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 02:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
There is nothing special about this natural nubmer. There is an infinite number of numbers with such properties. Liransh 11:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
":Weak Delete Cyclic number is encyclopedic but every cyclic number is not. It might be better to handle this number on the cyclic number page and redirect from 142857 (number) to that article. Shabda 14:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
points > 0. The property in relation to the number is interesting. points = 0. It's your call. points < 0. The property in relation to the number is NOT interesting.
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
WWE tours Japan, UK and Europe twice a year, we do not need individual pages for what are nothing more than fancy house shows. Darrenhusted 10:51, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Includes:
and its redirect
The result was keep ( WP:SNOW to an extent). 1 delete argument (weak delete) outnumbered and outargued by lots of keep arguments. Giggy Talk | Review 04:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC) reply
A beautifully written and thoroughly comprehensive advertisement for a televangelism programme of no obvious distinction, occupying the coveted 1am slot on a local TV station (but available of course via the Interwebs). If Wikipedia were a directory of televangelists, or an advertisement site,this would be a perfect article. But Wikipedia is neither of those things. Subject was already nuked once at Live Prayer with Bill Keller ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) due to OTRS complaints. Guy ( Help!) 10:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Core desat 03:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
vanity piece-this reads halfway between advert and religious tract Chris 10:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
DVD cruft, a list of matches and nothing else. The same applies to all the following articles. Darrenhusted 10:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This will lead to the CfD of Category:Total Nonstop Action Wrestling DVDs, as it will be empty after this AfD (assuming there is a vote to delete all).
The result was delete. -- Core desat 08:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable, These peoples refences are Not independent of the subject. They have not received significant recognised awards or honors. So they don't pass WP:BIO & WP:PROF. ExtraDry 08:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment Please look closely at this call for deletion by ExtraDry - it is difficult to assume good faith with this editor's current record of disruption. Tallum 09:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 08:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Pure spam for some estate agent. -- RHaworth 09:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus I took a few extra steps in closing this AfD, including doing a google news search which showed many possible sources. If people in the discussion had added any sources I would have closed this as a straight keep. It is unhelpful for people to call for keeping based on the existence of sourcing and not attempt to dig up the sources at all. Furthermore, I think that this may make more sense as a subsection of Papal conclave, 2005 and so a merge may be in order. JoshuaZ 17:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I think the title says it all really. The total lack of references is a violation of Verifiability policy Tim! 09:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic list. The information isn't of particular note in itself, largely unsourced and begins from the unreferenced premise that "most people" assume musicians aren't smart. Marwood 09:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Footballer who has never played first-team professional football. His sole claim to notability is his involvement in an altercation with Joey Barton during his time as a youth player at Manchester City. Oldelpaso 09:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 08:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
A Google search does not give any results for this person apart from the Wikipedia links. Mkeranat 09:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep - references provided assert notability and are clearly independent of the subject. NON-admin closure :: maelgwn - talk 06:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable, These peoples refences are Not independent of the subject. They have not received significant recognised awards or honors. So they don't pass WP:BIO & WP:PROF
I am also nominating the following related pages
* Keep Howe taught on three continents in the mid-19th century, was Headmaster of one of the most historic schools in Canada and then Headmaster of a
GPS School in Australia. At a time when most teachers were lucky to leave their village he looks pretty notable to me. Can somone fill in the blanks and tell us why he left Jarvis? That might make Howe really notable. This one needs considerable work - lets give it a chance.
Tallum 09:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
**Comment Please look at
WP:BIO for what is notable. Your more than welcome to copy it over to your userspace and work on it over there.
ExtraDry 09:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Comment Please look closely at this call for deletion by ExtraDry - it is difficult to assume good faith with this editor's current record of disruption.
Tallum 09:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
:Please do not make false accusations.
ExtraDry
09:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC) (moved to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Howe (headmaster))
reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
"one of the youngest, smallest, and least notorious gangs in the United States." Nothing comes up on google. Reasons to delete: non-notable, hoax, joke, blp. Take your pick. Calliopejen1 08:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Small, non-notable band, possibly vanity article PEAR ( talk) 07:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was KEEP (redirecting or copyediting is at the discretion of any editor) Nabla 02:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
All but one of these entries has an article of its own, and content here repeats content on those individual character articles. Each of the section headers -- Maximals, Predacons, Vehicons -- has its own category, each of which has many more entries than are on this List of..., suggesting this list is both incomplete and would become unwieldy if it were exhaustive. Recommend axing the list and replacing it with Category:Beast Machines characters. -- EEMeltonIV 07:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per consensus of established editors. Flood of apparent single-purpose accounts do not address policy/guideline-based reasons for deletion. -- Core desat 08:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Contested prod; rationale was "Organization with no referenced assertion of notability; delete per WP:CORP." I can't find any reliable independent sources to establish this organization's notability. -- Muchness 06:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I have a question. If there are two individuals in the same location, why can there only be one vote? I think that if there are two people either living together or living a mile away from one another, their opinion should still count. I'm unsure of how democracy works in this tribunal.
Who do we appeal to?
Any and all help is appreciated. Thank you. Anastasia the Innocent 04:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
If a person working for the Department of Tourism in Paris France, writes an article about the Eiffel Tower, is that self-promoting? The same goes for the person living in Toronto, proud of his or her city and writes about the CN Tower, Casa Loma or Centre Island. People write about what they know! Landmarks, lifestyles, organizations. They go hand-in-hand.
What I see here is alot of rhetoric and contradiction and very little discussion with regards to questions. This is more like a dirvish dance floor than a round table discussion.
I appreciate positive, reasonable feedback from some of you others, and I thank you very much for some of the help you posted. It is my belief that we are all here for the same purpose, to make the wikipedia pages more reliable as an information source.
Have a nice evening everyone, and thankyou again, Anastasia the Innocent 00:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus keep. Cool Hand Luke 00:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This article was created specifically to spin-off the referenced content one side in the content dispute did not like to see in the main Polish-Soviet War article. There is no reason the Wikipedia should have such an obvious fork. The atrocities are a part of the war and should be mentioned in the war article as they are mentioned in the sources. If there is too much detail, the solution is obvious. All important controversies should have their own encyclopedic articles. But this not really an article but an obvious backburner created to be a dump for an information rather than the source of the information only harms the Wikipedia's integrity. Since the article contains some material and references, I propose to preserve this in history and have it instead blanked by a redirect to a war article. -- Irpen 06:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus for deletion.. Navou banter 04:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
There are no third-party references here, only self-reference and websites. This is a non-notable page and looks like an attempt for advertisment and bias for an organization's president. Kephera975 06:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep per the information found by DanMS; no one has disputed its relevance or sufficiency. Please incorporate into the article. — TKD:: Talk 07:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
It is not notable appears to be a story. Pharaoh of the Wizards 05:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Kurykh 23:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Possible WP:COI the only entry of the Person who created this article.It is there only edit.It is unreferenced and lacks notabilty Pharaoh of the Wizards 05:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep as redirect to Deadsy - Nabla 14:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Does not meet notablity and not referenced at all .Article created in March 2007. Pharaoh of the Wizards 05:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Apparently about a 16th century book publisher. Google yields nothing for either the book, the publisher, and not much about the author. No assertion of notability. i said 05:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Some critics, me included consider that, without the contribution of this publisher the Giovanni Giacomo Penni “poemetto” would never been edited and the impact of the Lisbon Rhinoceros on Europe, and on the Court of Pope Leon X (the Medici pope) would not been as great. Perhaps even the interest of Dürer on drawing this beast at the time could be enhanced by these poems. This was a very important that changed the course of the art from the 16th century and until nowadays. The author of the poems and it’s publisher should be considered on the wikipedia. Besides, this information, as scarce as it may be, is the only available information to historians worldwide on the present day. - Dr. Nuno Carvalho de Sousa - Author of the brief resumé on Stephano Guilireti---- Ncsresearch 20:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The term itself is spurious. Numan only ever referred to the "Numan/Machine section" of his career, not a "machine trilogy", nor is the term widely used by his biographers or the music press in general. IntheNews.co.uk is one reference using the phrase 'machine' trilogy but even if the article were renamed to this it doesn't justify the same weight being given to it as say Bowie's "Berlin Trilogy". Google shows only a couple of non-WP (or derivative) hits on the phrase, employed by fans. In terms of content, the main facts already appear in the Gary Numan article and the relevant album pages. Ian Rose 04:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 08:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
A "festival" that has only one source of information, as well as very few (if any) links or sources to be found elsewhere. Jmlk 1 7 04:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy rdirect to Heroes (Beavis and Butt-head episode), fairly logical move seeing as articles were duplicates (both had exactly the same content). Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 03:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Article already exists at Heroes (Beavis and Butt-head episode). Oli Filth 03:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Please defer merge related discussion to article talk. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable ship (and no assertion of notability). Oli Filth 03:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, nomination made in error. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 03:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable per
WP:MUSIC.
Videmus Omnia
Talk 03:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)This was an erroneous nomination, could someone please close it?
Videmus Omnia
Talk
03:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This term is not in common usage, and the only links provided are to nn blog and internet sites. Seems to be a violation of WP:NOR. CJCurrie 03:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Nonnotable candidate for elective office; only 150 Google hits. The article does not contain third-party sources. Shalom Hello 02:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE (small organisation w/o any sourced achievements) - blanket "keep-everything" votes by and per Frijole were ignored. Nabla 14:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable summer camp. The only mention I could find is an evacuation due to a wildfire. Clarityfiend 02:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge. Navou banter 23:28, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability. Oli Filth 02:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable organization. Was nominated for PROD, speedied under A7, and contested, thus listed for AFD. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 02:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment It would be worth looking at Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference before forming an opinion on the Australian Conference. An article on the Association of Heads of Independent Schools of Australia [53], which replaced the Australian Conference, is also required to make sense of all this and to bring it into line with the English article. Archifile 04:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment I think this is just part of the ongoing attack on anyone who has contributed or commented on Newington College. Tallum, who created this page, must have fallen foul of a ExtraDry. Is it time for a snow job? Archifile 06:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment I notice that that ExtraDry is now calling for the deletion of all articles on Headmasters of Newington. Where will this end. Tallum 08:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable mall, fails WP:RS and WP:V. Only non-trivial reference found was a blog. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 02:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable mall, fails WP:RS and WP:V. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 02:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination. Expired {{ prod}} but comment on talk page contests the deletion. I abstain. Pascal.Tesson 02:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The article says it all; she basically appeared on the cover of two magazines and didn't do much else. Fails WP:BIO. Furthermore, this is completely unsourced. Crystallina 02:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Crystallina 02:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Compassion International. Pascal.Tesson 02:37, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Basically a copy of the main article Compassion International which itself is 90% spam. CitiCat ♫ 02:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy deleted (A7, db-bio, db-band). ELIMINATORJR 02:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Completely unreferenced article about a rapper, no proof of notability. Nyttend 01:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, given strong arguments for deletion and the way in which this article was created. -- Core desat 08:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The similar List of hotels in Singapore recently failed AfD after I had nominated it. My rationale there was Spam magnet. 90% redlinks and most of these articles, if created, would be deleted as non-notable or spam. Also, Wikipedia is not the Lonely Planet. Wikipedia is not a directory and such listings without context are useless. See hotels in London for an article that has some value. I believe that the same holds true of this article except for the redlinks part of it which is probably due mainly to the article being 24 hours old. Moreover, the creation of the list itself is somewhat disruptive: it was created by Kappa who strongly opposed the deletion of the Singaporean list. Pascal.Tesson 01:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Pascal.Tesson 01:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. RFerreira 18:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable elementary school. Elementary schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Wizardman 22:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable elementary school. Elementary schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Was tagged speedy as blatant advertising. Doesn't seem to meet that criteria (at least not blatantly) but when trying to make it less spamish I wasn't able to find much, so I'm going to go with not notable. CitiCat ♫ 01:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was trainwreck. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Also nominating the following schools (others in the district have already been nominated separately):
Short stubs (except for the apparently copyvio Sunset Elementary, from here) of schools in the Miami-Dade county schools. Elementary schools don't inherently have notability, and these ones are average schools, not notable ones. Nyttend 01:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I am a little reluctant to say it, but I think it may be just as easy scanning a group of these as going through the same number of individual ones as for the middle schools below. The difficulty is mainly if many of them need discussions, for it's hard to keep that straight. DGG ( talk) 04:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was merge/redirect to List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County. MastCell Talk 05:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The keep arguments were more convincing than the merge ones. Wizardman 22:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). Also completely unsourced ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Merge into *school district.
List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County a new article for elementary schools in Coral Gables, Florida. See my Update/Comment below No, you can't merge into the school district. A look at the school district article reveals a list of 195 elementary schools in the school district and they can't all have descriptions in the article. Possibly new articles could be created for the district's schools in certain areas (this one's in Coral Gables, Fla., for instance, and that only has a population of about 40,000 people, so it can't have too many elementary schools). An alternative would be to merge these elementary schools into an article -- essentially a list -- of all Miami-Dade School District elementary schools and later calve it off into regional articles as more information is added (I think there are about 20 articles for elementary schools in the district now). In fact, unless I get some strong objections to it, I'll do it myself.
Noroton 22:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC) (amended
Noroton
23:01, 8 August 2007 (UTC))
reply
The result was merge/redirect to List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County. MastCell Talk 06:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). Also completely unsourced ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was merge/redirect to List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County. MastCell Talk 06:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County. Pascal.Tesson 09:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
*Merge into school district per established precedent.
TerriersFan
21:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep. I'll note the discussion seems to lean toward a need for sourcing. I don't see a consensus to delete here, but more rather, the discussion seems to lean toward a consensus to keep and source.. Navou banter 17:02, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable elementary school/k-8 center. Elementary schools and middle schools (what this would be considered) do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). This one is not sourced at all, and is highly pov. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:50, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable elementary school. Elementary schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable elementary school. Elementary schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable file manager. No reputable third party sources to establish notability. -- Hdt83 Chat 01:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Absolutely no sources to verify that all these celebrities have passed through their doors. Search reveals a Tramps nightclub but no tramp nightclub. -- Hdt83 Chat 00:58, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 02:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This article has been speedy deleted several times as CSD A7. DRV determined that the FAME Award constituted an assertion of notability, so this matter is submitted to AfD for full consideration. I say weak delete until better sources arise, pending other opinions. Xoloz 00:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Redundant, information covered in Celine Dion. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band. No external sources, not verifiable. Article does assert that they played a regional tour, but provides no sources. Article created by single purpose account. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Merged into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screaming Mechanical Brain. Didn't realize nom was making separate AfD's for the albums, which are already listed in the main band article. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 00:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable album by a non-notable band, no external sources, non-verifiable. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all for want of WP:N. Cool Hand Luke 00:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Also listing the albums just in case. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 00:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band, except that they used to be called Screaming Monkey Boner. No independent sources outside of things like a Myspace page; No verifiability. I assume it must even fail WP:BAND. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
There almost as big as Psychostick, if not bigger. The only difference is that Psychostick has had one song on the radio and you can find their album in stores, but that's only because they're on a slightly bigger label. FallenWings47 21:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC) reply
They're one of the most well known bands in Minnesota. And they fucking rock! Tragedy_Bound_to_Happen 12:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
They've toured with national acts such as Psychostick, Dog Fashion Disco and (həd) p.e.. Bobthegreat47 12:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
No I'm not entirely sure they've had a song on the radio, but they have been mentioned on it. Their CDs can't be found in stores, but that's only because they're not on a very big label. The notability factor really depends on where you come from. Like the bands, Slow Motion Reign or Kittens for Christian aren't very famous and I don't believe they've had any songs on the radio either. But in the area they're from they're probably pretty famous. But the most likely reason they are most well known is because they are signed to System of a Down frontman Serj Tankian's record label, Serjical Strike Records. I'm just trying to make the point that SMB (Screaming Mechanical Brain) is a pretty famous band throughout the United States, but most of all in Minnesota. FallenWings47 12:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Do you have any particular suggestions on how I should do that? FallenWings47 21:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
All I can really say is use the band's official site or myspace for anything possible, otherwise I don't know what to tell you other than possibly going up to them and getting an interview or something like that. I mean I know most, if not all, that's on the main article is true. But that probably doesn't account for much without sources. And I made the articles for the albums (excluding There Is No God in Space) being I have a copy of each (including There Is No God in Space). I expect these articles are to be deleted, I hope however that you change your mind and leave it be. I mean, if someone went to all the trouble creating the article (yes, there may be no sources but at least it's all very possible information), that's at least got to mean something. FallenWings47 9:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Alright, I guess I understand. I copied them all already so yeah... FallenWings47 18:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC
The result wasDelete - POV and BLP concerns reinforce the strong consensus. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 08:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The article was created in March 2005 to remove content from the main article: Álvaro Uribe. Although it is not entirely a "quotefarm", about half of the article consists of quotes, which goes against the spirit of the "Wikipedia is not a directory" provision of WP:NOT. In addition, I feel that the article places undue weight on one particular aspect of Uribe's presidency, in violation of the NPOV and biographies of living persons policies. These allegations (of involvement in the Colombian drug trade) are already mentioned in the main article in the section titled " "Early political controversy". Thus, I do not feel that a merge is necessary or warranted. Black Falcon ( Talk) 00:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete, done by myself a minute ago. Daniel Case 00:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non notable band, unreferenced and original research, fails WP:MUSIC (and slightly spammy to boot). Eliz81 (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Neologism to jokingly refer to your colorful life accomplishments, purportedly in wide usage among select groups. Lack of verifiable sources indicates this is a non notable term. Eliz81 (talk) (contribs) 00:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
There's so little information available about the album. If the band has worked with anyone else, they haven't said so. It's unlikely considering Stefani's still touring. No song names have been released. There's minimal coverage from third-party sources; most of it just states that they're in the studio again, and the information is already covered in the No Doubt article. 17Drew 00:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep Sourcing is given so the argument that it is OR seems to have been handled. A merger may be advisable. JoshuaZ 17:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Tagged for speedy as an essay, which is not a valid criterion. Can this be made into an encyclopedic article? Or should it go to data heaven? YOU decide on tonight's episode of the top-rated hit "WIKIPEDIA ... Articles For Deletion". Daniel Case 00:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
![]() | This is an archive of a closed deletion discussion for the article Cheryl Lindsey Seelhoff. Please do not modify it. The result of this discussion was delete. The actual discussion is hidden from view for privacy reasons. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. |
The result was delete, even when disregarding all SPA arguments. -- Core desat 08:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. I'll also note, that even though the article was created by a sockpuppet of a banned user, it has also been contributed too by editors in good standing. This may be a strech of speedy deletion criteria. In addition, the article may require some sourcing. There is no consensus here for deletion.. Navou banter 16:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
List of X by Y article that we do not need. Completely unsourced. Created by sockpuppet of banned user as a place to get in edit fights. SchmuckyTheCat
The result was speedy delete as contribution of Qaka, sockpuppet of banned user Instantnood. — TKD:: Talk 21:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
(1), creation by sockpuppet of banned user (2), entirely unsourced (someone added a non-reliable source to the external links, that is not a source) (3) sockpuppet created it as a battleground to engage old foes. (4) it's non-notable trivia, list of X by criteria Y. there are good X by Y articles, this isn't ever going to be one. SchmuckyTheCat
The result was delete and convert to a redirect page. TerriersFan 04:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
It is only significant in the fact that it is a cover of Bohemian Rhapsody. It was never released as a single, and therefore probably isn't very famous, it should be deleted. MalwareSmarts 23:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Giant in-universe list of cruft. No verifiable sources to assert its notability. Delete or merge into Franky (One Piece). Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 23:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable clothing manufacturer. A Google test for "'Beija-Flor Jeans' -wikipedia" yields 227 results, which include two hits for their home page and a number of directory listings. These are reflected in the sources listed in the article. The sun article is about "jeans parties," mentioning Beija Flor in passing. The next three are directory listings from different sources, the fifth is an internal press release. The sixth is a directory listing. The only other claim to notability mentioned in the article is their sparking the "jeans party" movement. A Google test for "jeans party" fails to demonstrate that such a thing even exists, let alone that this company was responsible for setting them lose on the world. Consequentially 23:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Indiscriminate information and loosely associated topics. Arnold Schwarzenegger is an actor and also Governor of California... Arthur Conan Doyle was a writer and also a medical doctor. Where's the connection between those two people? They've had other jobs, so what? Original research needed here as only people with another "notable" profession are included, but it isn't clear which professions are notable and which aren't. Saikokira 23:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Centrx→ talk • 02:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Doesn't pass
WP:PORNBIO.
Epbr123 23:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Keep per
Corpx. Just about passes
WP:PORNBIO criteria 1.
Epbr123
12:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. GrooveDog ( talk) ( Review) 01:43, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Non-admin closure reply
Delete - directory of loosely associated topics. "Oh look, the Eiffel Tower is on my TV!" is not reason for an article listing off every time the tower shows up anywhere. Do not merge any of it into the tower's article. Otto4711 22:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong keep this article should be kept because its intresting and shows diffrent popular culture of the eiffel tower, besides people want to delete articles all the time that are perfectly good, we should keep this article, wikipedia does not have to be perfect in every way, and removing this article would lose a usefull article, just because there are not much sources does not mean its not worth including, so keep it.
Epbr123 08:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
nn college football blog, main claim of notability is that is was mentioned in passing by a San Jose newspaper, which isn't enough for notability. Biggspowd 22:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Aside from the obvious WP:V challenge of proving all of these people actually served in the unit, there is little reason to chronicle people who don't meet WP:N on their own. Also, take into account the maintenance issue. Formerly prodded, prod tag removed by 70.91.192.37. Consequentially 22:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Kurykh 23:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
nn sports blog, alexa is around 3,000,000 and never in top 100,000. A few references, but are indirect and not related to site. Most webpages do not need WP entries. Biggspowd 22:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — TKD:: Talk 22:04, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
nn internet magazine, alexa is around 6,000,000 and was never in top 100,000. Borderline spam and no showing of notability. Biggspowd 21:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. For something lacking any semblance of reliable sources or notability, merging is not the best option. — TKD:: Talk 22:15, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable drinking game; see also WP:NFT. Oli Filth 21:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Major problems with WP:BLP and WP:OR: no references or citations is the primary problem. A user on the Talk page admits that the entire article was constructed from personal knowledge and therefore cannot be properly referenced and cited. Google search turns up some passing references to his existence, but nothing like the detail contained in the article. Might not even be notable enough to justify an article. This is somewhat confirmed by the limited number of links to the article from other articles and the nature of those links. SESmith 21:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
nn wrestling event, was not on PPV or television, many other cards of similar attributes have been deleted. Had prod removed by wrestling fanboi. Biggspowd 21:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Page is non-notable as it relies on a website and self-referential books. Page also seems to not follow Wikipedia guidelines in WP:SPAM. I am also answering a challenge made without civility and in bad faith by User:IPSOS found here: [1] Kephera975 21:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Probable hoax - no references, and Google brings up nothing. Oli Filth 20:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
A non notable variation on tag. Wikipedia is not for stuff made up in school. The content shouldn't be merged anywhere unless there are reliable sources detailing this game, which is doubtful Darksun 20:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:29, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Completely unreferenced, unwikied vanity page advert for DJ Rossstar. Edits are primarily done by editors which are probably sock-puppets for the DJ with little other interest than in DJ Rossstar (occasionally making edits to other articles to reference DJ Rossstar [2]), and also by the DJ himself [3] (it was necessary for him to create a "DJ Rossstar" account so that he could legally upload his own picture on March 17, the same day Dansaysno put it on the DJ Rossstar bio). ~ JohnnyMrNinja 20:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band (see criteria at WP:MUSIC). Apparently split up in 2003, so no chance it will get any more notable. One band member used to have a bio and that has already been deleted. Savidan 20:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — TKD:: Talk 22:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-Notable athlete - does not meet WP:BIO for athletes having not played in a fully professional league. Contested PROD - no reason for contesting given Mattinbgn/ talk 20:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Sufficient reliable sources have been presented. JoshuaZ 20:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
relies on a website and a newspaper article for notability. There is only one secondary source and it is trivial or incidental at best. Kephera975 19:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
*Keep As the article and references seem fine. Nom seems petty and relies on subjective analysis on the sources, pushing
WP:Good faith to the limit.
Pharmboy
21:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
*delete - no demonstration of notability from independent third-party sources, no verifiability outside of their own writings. I hate bad-faith AfDs and people creating them to make a
WP:POINT, but to tell you the truth, if some witchy person goes and writes a bunch of books, that doesn't make them notable. What makes them notable is independent third-party coverage. If these witchy people are unknown outside of their own friends and readers, they don't go into Wikipedia. I can accept
WP:POINT if it helps identify self-congratulatory spam that needs to be removed from Wikipedia.
AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
14:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Fails to establish notability, and appears to have been created as a coatrack for Ayoub's anti-vaccination views. Sideshow Bob Roberts 19:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as per WP:SNOW. Capitalistroadster 17:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Fairly certain that this is a hoax. Couldn't find any references. Chris 19:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Navou banter 04:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-noteable Polish guy, fails WP:BIO, WP:N blah blah blah. Next! Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Unlikely Angel and add any sourced content there. JoshuaZ 20:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete. Non-noteable TV show which, after some vigirous searching, I can find no sources for. Dolly Parton fan site-possibly. Wikipedia-no. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Completing malformed nom by User:Kephera975 (nomination already existed; moved to proper "2nd nomination"). Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 19:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep for now While Wikipedia is not news and most reality show contestants are not inherently notable, this contestant was a finalist who seems to have created a large amount of press. This is essentially a tentative keep. If her album and other results do not result in any later coverage, this close should not be considered a strong precedent against future AfDs. JoshuaZ 20:34, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete. Another failed Reality TV contestant. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N etc. Was one of the first to be evicted from the most recent American Idol, he has done nothing noteable before or after her few appearences on the show. The article claims she released an album on iTunes, this is NOT the case. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep. Why should we delete this entry? She was a top 12 Finalist on a show viewed by hundreds of millions, and toured the country with many of the finalists. Even if she is mostly forgotten a year from now, why should we delete it? Should we delete wikipedia entries about silent movies that most people alive have never seen before? No, we should keep this entry.
this should be kept. As of right now they are noteable. andre1010
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Hemlock Martinis 22:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Wang C-H 19:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Withdraw nomination. Admins, please close. -- Wang C-H 15:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep, nomination withdrawn. Kusma ( talk) 06:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This article is a definition of a Chinese term; WP:NOT a dictionary. Wang C-H 19:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I withdraw the nomination. Admins, please close. -- Wang C-H 06:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep for now Look people, this isn't very complicated. There's no reason to delete these articles now when they are likely to be much more notable in the future. WP:NOTNEWS may apply later, but it is too early to tell. We aren't talking about someone who made the news because they taught a dog to stand on its hind legs and belch the national anthems of a dozen different countries. Nor are we talking about a reality televsion shown on channel 345.678 at 2 AM. We're talking about a finalist in the most popular reality show in the United States. If in 6 months or a year Glocksen has produced nothing else of note then we should re-examine the matter. I do however note that there are many google news hits and that the article is not very well sourced as it currently stands. I strongly suggest that those who support keeping the article source it to the best of their abilities. JoshuaZ 20:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete. Another failed Reality TV contestant. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N etc. Was the first to be evicted from the most recent American Idol, she has done nothing noteable before or after his few appearences on the show. I checked all of the trustworthy, reliable sites, and none of them say a word about her, or the EP she supposedly released. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedied. android 79 19:42, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
No references establishing notability. Wang C-H 19:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, All votes were keep and nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. -- JForget 01:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This is the Chinese equivalent of "Main Street" or "Broadway" and so does not deserve an article of its own. Wang C-H 19:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Admins, nomination withdrawn, please close. -- Wang C-H 23:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep for now. Closing logic is the same as that for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Glocksen and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Scarnato. JoshuaZ 20:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
DELETE - This person has done nothing really worth noting in grand scheme of things. he is a moderately good singer but so are thousands of others. That's my opinion anyway. Delete. Another failed Reality TV contestant. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N etc. Was the third to be evicted from the most recent American Idol, he has done nothing noteable before or after his few appearences on the show. Is now a member of a band-however, this band is NOT noteable. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 19:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Appears to be spam. Almost solely the work of Hroðgar æ Beocwealm, whose only other major contributions seem to be to George Tinker, the author of the book that is the subject of this article. Hroðgar æ Beocwealm also inserted a link to George Tinker into List of writers from peoples indigenous to the Americas, and hyperlinked a suspiciously prominent mention of the book (added by an anon) in Panentheism to this article. (I suspect that Hroðgar æ Beocwealm may actually be George Tinker himself, but can't prove it.) Finally, the article was prodded back in February but Hroðgar æ Beocwealm de-prodded it. — Hex (❝?!❞) 19:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep for now. Closing logic is the same as that for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Glocksen and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Scarnato. I also suggest that google news hits be used to better source this. JoshuaZ 20:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete. Another failed Reality TV contestant. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N etc. Was the second to be evicted from the most recent American Idol, she has done nothing noteable before or after his few appearences on the show. Hasn't, and isn't planning to, release any music so can't be classed as a singer or musician. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 18:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Stephanie was seen by tens of millions of people, and many recognize the name. Simply because you do not know if she is planning to release an album does not mean that she won't. She is more of a celebrity than many other persons on here. I feel that being a contestant on one of the biggest televisions shows in history justifies her having an article. User:Jameseyx
The result was keep for now. Closing logic is the same as that for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Glocksen and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haley Scarnato. I also suggest that google news hits be used to better source this. JoshuaZ 21:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete. Another failed Reality TV contestant. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N etc. Was the first to be evicted from the most recent American Idol, he has done nothing noteable before or after his few appearences on the show. Hasn't, and isn't planning to, release any music so can't be classed as a singer or musician. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 18:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by User:The undertow. Non-admin closure. Iain99 08:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not enough context provided to prove notability or even explain the concept. Csphdmoney 18:51, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
It is impossible to understand what this is about without any prior knowledge of the subject. DELETE! Jameseyx 19:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 02:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Csphdmoney 18:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT a dictionary. Csphdmoney 18:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
refers to terms associated with computers. Calgary 19:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was Keep Unanimous keep vote. Even the nom didn't cast the delete vote. non-admin closure.-- JForget 01:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This article is about a group of people ( Boston Red Sox fans) that have absolutely no notability. Ksy92003 (talk) 18:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was transwiki and delete. -- Core desat 07:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Speedy, snowball delete. Where do I start? Fails WP:TRIVIA in the title alone. Fails WP:N also. It's so bad, failing so many guidlines, I don't know what to say. Transwiki to WikiQuote? Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK)'s FA plea-please have your say! 18:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus (default to keep). Ignoring a couple of "keep" recommendations that don't address relevant policies or guidelines, it seems that there might be enough reliable sources to make this article pass standards; no one contradicted QuagmireDog's find of sources, but, at the same time, there wasn't a strong affirmation that they would be enough. In any event, please expand and source the article appropriately. — TKD:: Talk 22:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Open-source free game based on Tron, makes absolutely no assertions of notability ~ JohnnyMrNinja 17:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 02:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
A nonnotable neologism with limited use, per WP:NEO. Tewfik Talk 17:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This is a stub with notability completely unestablished by what appears to be only self reference to the organization's website. There are no secondary sources here at all. Kephera975 17:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Dying Fetus. No individual notability has been shown, but users are correct that these cases are best handled by merge/redirect to the group. In this case, I didn't see anything substantial that wasn't already in the target article, so just a redirect will suffice. — TKD:: Talk 22:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This is a factoid, not notable enough for article. Had it tagged to merge with Dying Fetus, original author removed tags and then deleted discussion on talk page after just one week. Article wasn't improved or refed in the while. Felt it was better to be here to hash out. Pharmboy 17:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep, cuz, uh, I dunno... IT'S A MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT FROM A SEMINAL DEATH-METAL BAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS ARTICLE IS JUST AS IMPORTANT AS JOHN GALLAGHER'S OR SEAN BEASLEY'S!!!!!!!! Dark Executioner 23:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner reply
68.218.44.10 23:48, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Festering Rat Corpse 23:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Festering Rat Corpse reply
Cowboy From Hell 666 23:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Cowboy From Hell 666 reply
Death Metal Is The Best Subgenre 23:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Death Metal Is The Best Subgenre reply
Redirect to the main article and merge the content.-- JForget 02:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Oh, okay, let's just delete ALL info about death-metal personell and leave the world without any easily-accessable info whatsoever. Yeah, that makes PERFECT sense. At least I'm trying to enlighten the world, cuz SOME of us might actually want to KNOW ABOUT THEM. Dark Executioner 15:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner reply
You know what, just delete the damn article and get it over with. Forgive me for trying to make Wikipedia's coverage of death-metal personell bigger and more diverse. I completely forgot that it was against the rules. Now, let's just move on with our lives. Dark Executioner 15:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner reply
I'm frustrated cuz I can't find any info on this guy whatsoever. I tried Googling him, it just pulled up stuff about an athelete by the same name. On Dying Fetus' website, it just tells about the circumstances on how he joined the band. I think it said that he's from Boston, but I'd have to double-check. Pharmboy, I'm just sick and tired of all the articles I create being nominated for deletion. It's happened before, but believe me, if I had any acess to info, I'd be glad to put it. I just wanted you to wait a while. Now that we're stuck with this, yeah, I'd have to say that my mind is changed and we should delete the article. If we mention it in the main page, then I guess that's enough. It just seems too dry, if you know what I mean. Oh yeah, if you were born before 1989, then that makes you older than me, but in NO WAY makes you a better metalhead. :-) Dark Executioner 20:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner reply
So, have we reached a verdict, anybody? Dark Executioner 21:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
At best this is a non-notable neologism; Google brings up nothing relevant. At worst, this is a hoax article. Oli Filth 17:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
No external sources, no verifiability, doubtful this would pass WP:BAND, and it probably wouldn't pass WP:N. Creator wasn't a single-purpose account - he/she did also contribute to two other articles on Wikipedia. However, this was the person's first article, thus suggesting WP:VSCA. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Tagged for notability since March 2007. Article says they released 2 CDs, each with a 200-copy run. Unverified article, no sources whatsoever, reads like a bio, band probably even fails WP:BAND, certainly fails WP:LIVING as there are no sources. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep—users have shown that there is source coverage out there. — Deckill er 00:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
1.3 million square foot super-regional mall, not notable otherwise. Super-regionals should be notable, but this one fails WP:RS and WP:V. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 16:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This is odd enough that I wanted to get consensus from the community. There are three separate things discussed here, non of which I think are notable. The first is surfing down a ice or snow covered hill with a tray (lunchroom, what have you). While there is no doubt this goes on, there isn't any indication this is any more notable then using any other object not designed explicitly for sledding. The second item discussed is placing the trays under the wheels of a car to execute an accelerated doughnut. There are no reliable sources that indicate the popularity of this, or if it is indeed tied to the Ghost ride the whip practice as stated in the article. The third thing discussed is surfing behind a car with the tray. This may be the most notable of the three, but again, kids have tied ropes to damn near anything and towed themselves behind cars. There are no sources that indicate this is any more notable then using a sled or a skateboard in a similar manner. I tried to see if there were good places where I could merge this information, but nothing seemed to fit into existing articles and this article is unsourced anyway, so merging would probably be a waste of time. Perhaps the community can find a proper solution, but if not, I wouldn't mind seeing this article go away. CosmicPenguin ( Talk) 16:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Ruddy Hell! It's Harry and Paul. John254 02:36, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Prod on May 5th, removed same day by page creator. Minor sketch by a character in Ruddy Hell! It's Harry and Paul. No assertion of notability other than a link to YouTube. Propose a redirect to Ruddy Hell! It's Harry and Paul. SilkTork 15:57, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus for deletion. There appears to be consensus to keep at least the Business First and Washington Business Journal, but the others are not so clear. There seems to be a growing thought that they should be all merged/redirected to American City Business Journals, and if this is the case, please take merge/redirect discussion to the appropriate talk pages. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Local business journal. An nominating all the journals linked off American City Business Journals Improbcat 15:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:51, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to be a notable event, written like an advertisement, no external news sources (despite the many refs, they either are for the CSSreboot.com site, or other sites participating in the event: NOT 3rd party news sources). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 15:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete—fails to establish true notability outside of a loose list of appearances. — Deckill er 14:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - random collection of unassociated items which share nothing in common past a mention of greater or lesser triviality to NYU. A list of fictional characters who attemded NYU and a list of TV episodes that mention it or was partially shot there does not constitute an encyclopedia article. Otto4711 14:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. -- Core desat 03:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - a seemingly random collection of fiction set at or near Yale, trivial mentions of Yale, fictional characters who go or want to go to Yale and fiction set at schools which supposedly resemble Yale. A directory of unassociated topics of no encyclopedic value. Otto4711 13:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, reasons for keeping are quite weak and are not from a policy or guideline basis. -- Core desat 07:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - mish-mash collection of times a Coast Guard vehicle or person has appeared in a film combined with times the words "Coast Guard" happens to be mentioned on TV equals directory of loosely associated topics. Tells us nothing about the Coast Guard or the fiction from which the trivial references are drawn. Otto4711 13:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This is absolute bollocks. Nothing has been announced, ridiculously crystal ball. By the same editor who bought us Call of Duty 5. What next? The Passion of the Christ 2: Rapture? Quake 5? - hahnch e n 12:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 02:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
There is nothing special about this natural nubmer. There is an infinite number of numbers with such properties. Liransh 11:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
":Weak Delete Cyclic number is encyclopedic but every cyclic number is not. It might be better to handle this number on the cyclic number page and redirect from 142857 (number) to that article. Shabda 14:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
points > 0. The property in relation to the number is interesting. points = 0. It's your call. points < 0. The property in relation to the number is NOT interesting.
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:55, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
WWE tours Japan, UK and Europe twice a year, we do not need individual pages for what are nothing more than fancy house shows. Darrenhusted 10:51, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Includes:
and its redirect
The result was keep ( WP:SNOW to an extent). 1 delete argument (weak delete) outnumbered and outargued by lots of keep arguments. Giggy Talk | Review 04:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC) reply
A beautifully written and thoroughly comprehensive advertisement for a televangelism programme of no obvious distinction, occupying the coveted 1am slot on a local TV station (but available of course via the Interwebs). If Wikipedia were a directory of televangelists, or an advertisement site,this would be a perfect article. But Wikipedia is neither of those things. Subject was already nuked once at Live Prayer with Bill Keller ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) due to OTRS complaints. Guy ( Help!) 10:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Core desat 03:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
vanity piece-this reads halfway between advert and religious tract Chris 10:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 07:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
DVD cruft, a list of matches and nothing else. The same applies to all the following articles. Darrenhusted 10:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This will lead to the CfD of Category:Total Nonstop Action Wrestling DVDs, as it will be empty after this AfD (assuming there is a vote to delete all).
The result was delete. -- Core desat 08:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable, These peoples refences are Not independent of the subject. They have not received significant recognised awards or honors. So they don't pass WP:BIO & WP:PROF. ExtraDry 08:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment Please look closely at this call for deletion by ExtraDry - it is difficult to assume good faith with this editor's current record of disruption. Tallum 09:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 08:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Pure spam for some estate agent. -- RHaworth 09:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus I took a few extra steps in closing this AfD, including doing a google news search which showed many possible sources. If people in the discussion had added any sources I would have closed this as a straight keep. It is unhelpful for people to call for keeping based on the existence of sourcing and not attempt to dig up the sources at all. Furthermore, I think that this may make more sense as a subsection of Papal conclave, 2005 and so a merge may be in order. JoshuaZ 17:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I think the title says it all really. The total lack of references is a violation of Verifiability policy Tim! 09:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Unencyclopedic list. The information isn't of particular note in itself, largely unsourced and begins from the unreferenced premise that "most people" assume musicians aren't smart. Marwood 09:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Footballer who has never played first-team professional football. His sole claim to notability is his involvement in an altercation with Joey Barton during his time as a youth player at Manchester City. Oldelpaso 09:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 08:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
A Google search does not give any results for this person apart from the Wikipedia links. Mkeranat 09:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep - references provided assert notability and are clearly independent of the subject. NON-admin closure :: maelgwn - talk 06:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable, These peoples refences are Not independent of the subject. They have not received significant recognised awards or honors. So they don't pass WP:BIO & WP:PROF
I am also nominating the following related pages
* Keep Howe taught on three continents in the mid-19th century, was Headmaster of one of the most historic schools in Canada and then Headmaster of a
GPS School in Australia. At a time when most teachers were lucky to leave their village he looks pretty notable to me. Can somone fill in the blanks and tell us why he left Jarvis? That might make Howe really notable. This one needs considerable work - lets give it a chance.
Tallum 09:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
**Comment Please look at
WP:BIO for what is notable. Your more than welcome to copy it over to your userspace and work on it over there.
ExtraDry 09:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Comment Please look closely at this call for deletion by ExtraDry - it is difficult to assume good faith with this editor's current record of disruption.
Tallum 09:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
:Please do not make false accusations.
ExtraDry
09:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC) (moved to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Howe (headmaster))
reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
"one of the youngest, smallest, and least notorious gangs in the United States." Nothing comes up on google. Reasons to delete: non-notable, hoax, joke, blp. Take your pick. Calliopejen1 08:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Small, non-notable band, possibly vanity article PEAR ( talk) 07:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was KEEP (redirecting or copyediting is at the discretion of any editor) Nabla 02:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
All but one of these entries has an article of its own, and content here repeats content on those individual character articles. Each of the section headers -- Maximals, Predacons, Vehicons -- has its own category, each of which has many more entries than are on this List of..., suggesting this list is both incomplete and would become unwieldy if it were exhaustive. Recommend axing the list and replacing it with Category:Beast Machines characters. -- EEMeltonIV 07:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per consensus of established editors. Flood of apparent single-purpose accounts do not address policy/guideline-based reasons for deletion. -- Core desat 08:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Contested prod; rationale was "Organization with no referenced assertion of notability; delete per WP:CORP." I can't find any reliable independent sources to establish this organization's notability. -- Muchness 06:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I have a question. If there are two individuals in the same location, why can there only be one vote? I think that if there are two people either living together or living a mile away from one another, their opinion should still count. I'm unsure of how democracy works in this tribunal.
Who do we appeal to?
Any and all help is appreciated. Thank you. Anastasia the Innocent 04:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
If a person working for the Department of Tourism in Paris France, writes an article about the Eiffel Tower, is that self-promoting? The same goes for the person living in Toronto, proud of his or her city and writes about the CN Tower, Casa Loma or Centre Island. People write about what they know! Landmarks, lifestyles, organizations. They go hand-in-hand.
What I see here is alot of rhetoric and contradiction and very little discussion with regards to questions. This is more like a dirvish dance floor than a round table discussion.
I appreciate positive, reasonable feedback from some of you others, and I thank you very much for some of the help you posted. It is my belief that we are all here for the same purpose, to make the wikipedia pages more reliable as an information source.
Have a nice evening everyone, and thankyou again, Anastasia the Innocent 00:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus keep. Cool Hand Luke 00:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This article was created specifically to spin-off the referenced content one side in the content dispute did not like to see in the main Polish-Soviet War article. There is no reason the Wikipedia should have such an obvious fork. The atrocities are a part of the war and should be mentioned in the war article as they are mentioned in the sources. If there is too much detail, the solution is obvious. All important controversies should have their own encyclopedic articles. But this not really an article but an obvious backburner created to be a dump for an information rather than the source of the information only harms the Wikipedia's integrity. Since the article contains some material and references, I propose to preserve this in history and have it instead blanked by a redirect to a war article. -- Irpen 06:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus for deletion.. Navou banter 04:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
There are no third-party references here, only self-reference and websites. This is a non-notable page and looks like an attempt for advertisment and bias for an organization's president. Kephera975 06:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep per the information found by DanMS; no one has disputed its relevance or sufficiency. Please incorporate into the article. — TKD:: Talk 07:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
It is not notable appears to be a story. Pharaoh of the Wizards 05:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Kurykh 23:22, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Possible WP:COI the only entry of the Person who created this article.It is there only edit.It is unreferenced and lacks notabilty Pharaoh of the Wizards 05:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep as redirect to Deadsy - Nabla 14:26, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Does not meet notablity and not referenced at all .Article created in March 2007. Pharaoh of the Wizards 05:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Apparently about a 16th century book publisher. Google yields nothing for either the book, the publisher, and not much about the author. No assertion of notability. i said 05:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Some critics, me included consider that, without the contribution of this publisher the Giovanni Giacomo Penni “poemetto” would never been edited and the impact of the Lisbon Rhinoceros on Europe, and on the Court of Pope Leon X (the Medici pope) would not been as great. Perhaps even the interest of Dürer on drawing this beast at the time could be enhanced by these poems. This was a very important that changed the course of the art from the 16th century and until nowadays. The author of the poems and it’s publisher should be considered on the wikipedia. Besides, this information, as scarce as it may be, is the only available information to historians worldwide on the present day. - Dr. Nuno Carvalho de Sousa - Author of the brief resumé on Stephano Guilireti---- Ncsresearch 20:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The term itself is spurious. Numan only ever referred to the "Numan/Machine section" of his career, not a "machine trilogy", nor is the term widely used by his biographers or the music press in general. IntheNews.co.uk is one reference using the phrase 'machine' trilogy but even if the article were renamed to this it doesn't justify the same weight being given to it as say Bowie's "Berlin Trilogy". Google shows only a couple of non-WP (or derivative) hits on the phrase, employed by fans. In terms of content, the main facts already appear in the Gary Numan article and the relevant album pages. Ian Rose 04:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 08:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
A "festival" that has only one source of information, as well as very few (if any) links or sources to be found elsewhere. Jmlk 1 7 04:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy rdirect to Heroes (Beavis and Butt-head episode), fairly logical move seeing as articles were duplicates (both had exactly the same content). Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 03:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Article already exists at Heroes (Beavis and Butt-head episode). Oli Filth 03:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Please defer merge related discussion to article talk. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable ship (and no assertion of notability). Oli Filth 03:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep, nomination made in error. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 03:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable per
WP:MUSIC.
Videmus Omnia
Talk 03:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)This was an erroneous nomination, could someone please close it?
Videmus Omnia
Talk
03:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This term is not in common usage, and the only links provided are to nn blog and internet sites. Seems to be a violation of WP:NOR. CJCurrie 03:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Nonnotable candidate for elective office; only 150 Google hits. The article does not contain third-party sources. Shalom Hello 02:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was DELETE (small organisation w/o any sourced achievements) - blanket "keep-everything" votes by and per Frijole were ignored. Nabla 14:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable summer camp. The only mention I could find is an evacuation due to a wildfire. Clarityfiend 02:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge. Navou banter 23:28, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability. Oli Filth 02:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable organization. Was nominated for PROD, speedied under A7, and contested, thus listed for AFD. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 02:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment It would be worth looking at Headmasters' and Headmistresses' Conference before forming an opinion on the Australian Conference. An article on the Association of Heads of Independent Schools of Australia [53], which replaced the Australian Conference, is also required to make sense of all this and to bring it into line with the English article. Archifile 04:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment I think this is just part of the ongoing attack on anyone who has contributed or commented on Newington College. Tallum, who created this page, must have fallen foul of a ExtraDry. Is it time for a snow job? Archifile 06:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment I notice that that ExtraDry is now calling for the deletion of all articles on Headmasters of Newington. Where will this end. Tallum 08:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable mall, fails WP:RS and WP:V. Only non-trivial reference found was a blog. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 02:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable mall, fails WP:RS and WP:V. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 02:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination. Expired {{ prod}} but comment on talk page contests the deletion. I abstain. Pascal.Tesson 02:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The article says it all; she basically appeared on the cover of two magazines and didn't do much else. Fails WP:BIO. Furthermore, this is completely unsourced. Crystallina 02:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Crystallina 02:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Compassion International. Pascal.Tesson 02:37, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Basically a copy of the main article Compassion International which itself is 90% spam. CitiCat ♫ 02:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy deleted (A7, db-bio, db-band). ELIMINATORJR 02:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Completely unreferenced article about a rapper, no proof of notability. Nyttend 01:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, given strong arguments for deletion and the way in which this article was created. -- Core desat 08:11, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The similar List of hotels in Singapore recently failed AfD after I had nominated it. My rationale there was Spam magnet. 90% redlinks and most of these articles, if created, would be deleted as non-notable or spam. Also, Wikipedia is not the Lonely Planet. Wikipedia is not a directory and such listings without context are useless. See hotels in London for an article that has some value. I believe that the same holds true of this article except for the redlinks part of it which is probably due mainly to the article being 24 hours old. Moreover, the creation of the list itself is somewhat disruptive: it was created by Kappa who strongly opposed the deletion of the Singaporean list. Pascal.Tesson 01:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Pascal.Tesson 01:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. RFerreira 18:57, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable elementary school. Elementary schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Wizardman 22:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable elementary school. Elementary schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:40, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Was tagged speedy as blatant advertising. Doesn't seem to meet that criteria (at least not blatantly) but when trying to make it less spamish I wasn't able to find much, so I'm going to go with not notable. CitiCat ♫ 01:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was trainwreck. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Also nominating the following schools (others in the district have already been nominated separately):
Short stubs (except for the apparently copyvio Sunset Elementary, from here) of schools in the Miami-Dade county schools. Elementary schools don't inherently have notability, and these ones are average schools, not notable ones. Nyttend 01:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
I am a little reluctant to say it, but I think it may be just as easy scanning a group of these as going through the same number of individual ones as for the middle schools below. The difficulty is mainly if many of them need discussions, for it's hard to keep that straight. DGG ( talk) 04:00, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was merge/redirect to List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County. MastCell Talk 05:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The keep arguments were more convincing than the merge ones. Wizardman 22:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). Also completely unsourced ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Merge into *school district.
List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County a new article for elementary schools in Coral Gables, Florida. See my Update/Comment below No, you can't merge into the school district. A look at the school district article reveals a list of 195 elementary schools in the school district and they can't all have descriptions in the article. Possibly new articles could be created for the district's schools in certain areas (this one's in Coral Gables, Fla., for instance, and that only has a population of about 40,000 people, so it can't have too many elementary schools). An alternative would be to merge these elementary schools into an article -- essentially a list -- of all Miami-Dade School District elementary schools and later calve it off into regional articles as more information is added (I think there are about 20 articles for elementary schools in the district now). In fact, unless I get some strong objections to it, I'll do it myself.
Noroton 22:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC) (amended
Noroton
23:01, 8 August 2007 (UTC))
reply
The result was merge/redirect to List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County. MastCell Talk 06:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). Also completely unsourced ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:29, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was merge/redirect to List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County. MastCell Talk 06:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County. Pascal.Tesson 09:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable middle school. middle schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:26, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
*Merge into school district per established precedent.
TerriersFan
21:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep. I'll note the discussion seems to lean toward a need for sourcing. I don't see a consensus to delete here, but more rather, the discussion seems to lean toward a consensus to keep and source.. Navou banter 17:02, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable elementary school/k-8 center. Elementary schools and middle schools (what this would be considered) do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). This one is not sourced at all, and is highly pov. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Miami-Dade County Public Schools. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:50, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable elementary school. Elementary schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
non notable elementary school. Elementary schools do not generally have inherent notability, and this one only has light assertions of notability (otherwise it would be speedied). ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable file manager. No reputable third party sources to establish notability. -- Hdt83 Chat 01:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Absolutely no sources to verify that all these celebrities have passed through their doors. Search reveals a Tramps nightclub but no tramp nightclub. -- Hdt83 Chat 00:58, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 02:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
This article has been speedy deleted several times as CSD A7. DRV determined that the FAME Award constituted an assertion of notability, so this matter is submitted to AfD for full consideration. I say weak delete until better sources arise, pending other opinions. Xoloz 00:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Redundant, information covered in Celine Dion. Videmus Omnia Talk 00:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band. No external sources, not verifiable. Article does assert that they played a regional tour, but provides no sources. Article created by single purpose account. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Merged into Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screaming Mechanical Brain. Didn't realize nom was making separate AfD's for the albums, which are already listed in the main band article. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 00:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable album by a non-notable band, no external sources, non-verifiable. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all for want of WP:N. Cool Hand Luke 00:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Also listing the albums just in case. Ten Pound Hammer • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps• Review?) 00:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band, except that they used to be called Screaming Monkey Boner. No independent sources outside of things like a Myspace page; No verifiability. I assume it must even fail WP:BAND. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
There almost as big as Psychostick, if not bigger. The only difference is that Psychostick has had one song on the radio and you can find their album in stores, but that's only because they're on a slightly bigger label. FallenWings47 21:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC) reply
They're one of the most well known bands in Minnesota. And they fucking rock! Tragedy_Bound_to_Happen 12:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
They've toured with national acts such as Psychostick, Dog Fashion Disco and (həd) p.e.. Bobthegreat47 12:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
No I'm not entirely sure they've had a song on the radio, but they have been mentioned on it. Their CDs can't be found in stores, but that's only because they're not on a very big label. The notability factor really depends on where you come from. Like the bands, Slow Motion Reign or Kittens for Christian aren't very famous and I don't believe they've had any songs on the radio either. But in the area they're from they're probably pretty famous. But the most likely reason they are most well known is because they are signed to System of a Down frontman Serj Tankian's record label, Serjical Strike Records. I'm just trying to make the point that SMB (Screaming Mechanical Brain) is a pretty famous band throughout the United States, but most of all in Minnesota. FallenWings47 12:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Do you have any particular suggestions on how I should do that? FallenWings47 21:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
All I can really say is use the band's official site or myspace for anything possible, otherwise I don't know what to tell you other than possibly going up to them and getting an interview or something like that. I mean I know most, if not all, that's on the main article is true. But that probably doesn't account for much without sources. And I made the articles for the albums (excluding There Is No God in Space) being I have a copy of each (including There Is No God in Space). I expect these articles are to be deleted, I hope however that you change your mind and leave it be. I mean, if someone went to all the trouble creating the article (yes, there may be no sources but at least it's all very possible information), that's at least got to mean something. FallenWings47 9:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Alright, I guess I understand. I copied them all already so yeah... FallenWings47 18:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC
The result wasDelete - POV and BLP concerns reinforce the strong consensus. Blnguyen ( bananabucket) 08:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The article was created in March 2005 to remove content from the main article: Álvaro Uribe. Although it is not entirely a "quotefarm", about half of the article consists of quotes, which goes against the spirit of the "Wikipedia is not a directory" provision of WP:NOT. In addition, I feel that the article places undue weight on one particular aspect of Uribe's presidency, in violation of the NPOV and biographies of living persons policies. These allegations (of involvement in the Colombian drug trade) are already mentioned in the main article in the section titled " "Early political controversy". Thus, I do not feel that a merge is necessary or warranted. Black Falcon ( Talk) 00:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete, done by myself a minute ago. Daniel Case 00:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Non notable band, unreferenced and original research, fails WP:MUSIC (and slightly spammy to boot). Eliz81 (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Neologism to jokingly refer to your colorful life accomplishments, purportedly in wide usage among select groups. Lack of verifiable sources indicates this is a non notable term. Eliz81 (talk) (contribs) 00:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
There's so little information available about the album. If the band has worked with anyone else, they haven't said so. It's unlikely considering Stefani's still touring. No song names have been released. There's minimal coverage from third-party sources; most of it just states that they're in the studio again, and the information is already covered in the No Doubt article. 17Drew 00:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep Sourcing is given so the argument that it is OR seems to have been handled. A merger may be advisable. JoshuaZ 17:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
Tagged for speedy as an essay, which is not a valid criterion. Can this be made into an encyclopedic article? Or should it go to data heaven? YOU decide on tonight's episode of the top-rated hit "WIKIPEDIA ... Articles For Deletion". Daniel Case 00:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC) reply
![]() | This is an archive of a closed deletion discussion for the article Cheryl Lindsey Seelhoff. Please do not modify it. The result of this discussion was delete. The actual discussion is hidden from view for privacy reasons. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. |
The result was delete, even when disregarding all SPA arguments. -- Core desat 08:15, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. I'll also note, that even though the article was created by a sockpuppet of a banned user, it has also been contributed too by editors in good standing. This may be a strech of speedy deletion criteria. In addition, the article may require some sourcing. There is no consensus here for deletion.. Navou banter 16:47, 11 August 2007 (UTC) reply
List of X by Y article that we do not need. Completely unsourced. Created by sockpuppet of banned user as a place to get in edit fights. SchmuckyTheCat
The result was speedy delete as contribution of Qaka, sockpuppet of banned user Instantnood. — TKD:: Talk 21:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC) reply
(1), creation by sockpuppet of banned user (2), entirely unsourced (someone added a non-reliable source to the external links, that is not a source) (3) sockpuppet created it as a battleground to engage old foes. (4) it's non-notable trivia, list of X by criteria Y. there are good X by Y articles, this isn't ever going to be one. SchmuckyTheCat