This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to an
Arbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in 2017 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in 2017.
The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable).
“
All sanctions and page restrictions must be logged by the administrator who applied the sanction or page restriction at
Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log. Whenever a sanction or page restriction is appealed or modified, the administrator amending it must append a note recording the amendment to the original log entry.
To be valid, sanctions must be clearly and unambiguously labelled as an arbitration enforcement action (such as with "arbitration enforcement", "arb enforcement", "AE" or "WP:AE" in the
Wikipedia log entry or the edit summary). If a sanction has been logged as an arbitration enforcement action but has not been clearly labelled as an arbitration enforcement action any uninvolved administrator may amend the sanction (for example, a null edit or reblocking with the same settings) on behalf of the original administrator. Labelling a sanction which has been logged does not make the administrator who added the label the "enforcing administrator" unless there is confusion as to who intended the sanction be arbitration enforcement.
A central log of all page restrictions and sanctions (including blocks, bans, page protections or other restrictions) placed as arbitration enforcement (including contentious topic restrictions) is to be maintained by the Committee and its clerks at
Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log.
Snooganssnoogans is banned from mass editing in the area of American Politics post-1932 for an indefinite period of time. This means adding (more or less) the same material to more than two articles. He is free to use the talk page of any article to request edits if he feels more articles should have the material. He may appeal at WP:AE after one year and every six months after that if the first appeal is unsuccessful. Per
[17].
Dennis Brown -
2¢23:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Holanthony (
talk·contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from editing in the BLP topic area, specifically "any edit in any article with biographical content relating to living or recently deceased people, or any edit relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles of any page in any namespace".
[22]BethNaught (
talk)
14:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Das osmnezz is subject to the following edit restrictions for one year... they may not create any BLP articles w/o first submitting them as a WP:DRAFT to WP:AFC for review and approval. Further any edits to BLPs about soccer/football players must be reviewed and approved by another extended confirmed editor before said edit can be added to the article.
Full text of the Edit Restrictions Notice. -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
01:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)reply
An appeal of the block was submitted by Ranze to the AE noticeboard and was
declined. Furthermore, Ranze was indefinitely banned from making any edit about, and from editing any page relating to, (a) Gamergate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
11:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Samm19 (
talk·contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from pages related to India, Pakistan or Afghanistan.
[35] Strictly uncontroversial articles related to those countries are allowed, see note
here. If they edit other topics constructively for six months, I'll view an appeal favorably.
Bishonen |
talk21:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC).reply
Jangg8962 (
talk·contribs) is
blocked blocked one week for
lame name order changes specifically warned against - "All edits that consist merely of changing around the order of mentioning the two countries ("Japanese-Korean" vs. "Korean-Japanese", etc.), or edits that mess with the naming of "Japan Sea"/"East Sea", "Liancourt Rocks"/"Dokdo", etc., are strictly forbidden, unless they have been discussed and reached consensus in advance." --
NeilNtalk to me11:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Marlo Jonesa (
talk·contribs) is topic banned from the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area for one year under discretionary sanctions due to repeatedly editing within the Israeli–Palestinian conflict topic area despite the previous consensus at
this AE thread to require 500 substantial edits before the editor returns to editing I–P conflict articles. Despite repeated warnings that editing pages within the topic area violates the spirit (if not the word) of
WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, their editing patterns remained unchanged. ~
Rob13Talk01:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The Committee should probably be made aware that I have taken it upon myself to 500/30 tens of articles—more so than it would be practical to log on here. From every significant settlement to every Palestinian refugee camp, to operations, battles, biographies, and more. My aim has largely been preventative (with "reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict" as my guiding principle). For most of these, please refer to my
May protection log.El_C02:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)reply
This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to an
Arbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in 2017 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in 2017.
The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable).
“
All sanctions and page restrictions must be logged by the administrator who applied the sanction or page restriction at
Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log. Whenever a sanction or page restriction is appealed or modified, the administrator amending it must append a note recording the amendment to the original log entry.
To be valid, sanctions must be clearly and unambiguously labelled as an arbitration enforcement action (such as with "arbitration enforcement", "arb enforcement", "AE" or "WP:AE" in the
Wikipedia log entry or the edit summary). If a sanction has been logged as an arbitration enforcement action but has not been clearly labelled as an arbitration enforcement action any uninvolved administrator may amend the sanction (for example, a null edit or reblocking with the same settings) on behalf of the original administrator. Labelling a sanction which has been logged does not make the administrator who added the label the "enforcing administrator" unless there is confusion as to who intended the sanction be arbitration enforcement.
A central log of all page restrictions and sanctions (including blocks, bans, page protections or other restrictions) placed as arbitration enforcement (including contentious topic restrictions) is to be maintained by the Committee and its clerks at
Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log.
Snooganssnoogans is banned from mass editing in the area of American Politics post-1932 for an indefinite period of time. This means adding (more or less) the same material to more than two articles. He is free to use the talk page of any article to request edits if he feels more articles should have the material. He may appeal at WP:AE after one year and every six months after that if the first appeal is unsuccessful. Per
[17].
Dennis Brown -
2¢23:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Holanthony (
talk·contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from editing in the BLP topic area, specifically "any edit in any article with biographical content relating to living or recently deceased people, or any edit relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles of any page in any namespace".
[22]BethNaught (
talk)
14:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Das osmnezz is subject to the following edit restrictions for one year... they may not create any BLP articles w/o first submitting them as a WP:DRAFT to WP:AFC for review and approval. Further any edits to BLPs about soccer/football players must be reviewed and approved by another extended confirmed editor before said edit can be added to the article.
Full text of the Edit Restrictions Notice. -
Ad Orientem (
talk)
01:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)reply
An appeal of the block was submitted by Ranze to the AE noticeboard and was
declined. Furthermore, Ranze was indefinitely banned from making any edit about, and from editing any page relating to, (a) Gamergate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans //
11:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)reply
Samm19 (
talk·contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from pages related to India, Pakistan or Afghanistan.
[35] Strictly uncontroversial articles related to those countries are allowed, see note
here. If they edit other topics constructively for six months, I'll view an appeal favorably.
Bishonen |
talk21:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC).reply
Jangg8962 (
talk·contribs) is
blocked blocked one week for
lame name order changes specifically warned against - "All edits that consist merely of changing around the order of mentioning the two countries ("Japanese-Korean" vs. "Korean-Japanese", etc.), or edits that mess with the naming of "Japan Sea"/"East Sea", "Liancourt Rocks"/"Dokdo", etc., are strictly forbidden, unless they have been discussed and reached consensus in advance." --
NeilNtalk to me11:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Marlo Jonesa (
talk·contribs) is topic banned from the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area for one year under discretionary sanctions due to repeatedly editing within the Israeli–Palestinian conflict topic area despite the previous consensus at
this AE thread to require 500 substantial edits before the editor returns to editing I–P conflict articles. Despite repeated warnings that editing pages within the topic area violates the spirit (if not the word) of
WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, their editing patterns remained unchanged. ~
Rob13Talk01:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)reply
The Committee should probably be made aware that I have taken it upon myself to 500/30 tens of articles—more so than it would be practical to log on here. From every significant settlement to every Palestinian refugee camp, to operations, battles, biographies, and more. My aim has largely been preventative (with "reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict" as my guiding principle). For most of these, please refer to my
May protection log.El_C02:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)reply