This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 |
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ― Buster7 ☎
Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Spicy ( talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Did you know that according to this, you're my biggest fan? I don't use the thanks button that often but I assure you the feeling is mutual. Best wishes for the holiday season.
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks @ Spicy:. I so appreciate all your help at SPI. Happy holidays to you and your loved ones. All the best for 2024. Star Mississippi 19:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Holiday greetings and wishes for a new year filled with light and magic! | |
Hi Star Mississippi, Best wishes during this holiday season for peace, prosperity, health, happiness, and of course fun and good food. Oh and cute animals, like raccoons and glow-in-the-dark foxes. I have really enjoyed working together on various projects here, and am grateful to have you as a friendly fellow editor. Thank you for everything you do for the encyclopedia and this community. |
Onel5969 TT me 02:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Star, and happy new year. I just noticed that CT55555 has not edited since September. I'm sorry to see that they are taking an extended leave, and hope they come back. Any idea why they may have left? I miss seeing them around! Netherzone ( talk) 00:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, hope you doing well. I wanted to ask you about the said draft article. I have further worked on it, updated the article and added more citations. I wanted you to have a look into it and give your opinion whether it's ready for mainspace or not. Thanks, Happy New Year! IBuNeriPK ( talk) 18:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
I am not sure I understand the deletion, or the delete arguments, you had citations in the article, a mix of, the addition of the previous AfD had Article 1, Article 2, Article 3, Article 4, Article 5, USAID Press Release, Article 6. Posted by PiccklePiclePikel ... So I was under the impression there should be more than enough for GNG. So is the AfD down to just a numbers voting game again? Because there certainly wasn't any in-depth discussion from one delete argument to me. So you'd have to forgive me, but I can't see how it deserves to be a SALT option. The guy is very wealthy and one of the top elites of the country, who contributes in somewhat political circles. I am against SALTing. Govvy ( talk) 09:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
the guy is very wealthy and one of the top elites of the country, who contributes in somewhat political circles.and
I've seen far worse off articles on American representation get kept for less.are not arguments that are going to hold up as a keep or convince someone to review their decision. Something he mentioned (that's literally it and the same here and here, a quote) aren't enough to pass notability and they're definitely not independent. Even ones like this which you didn't call a press release are exactly that. If you believe my close is wrong, I support a DRV, but the sourcing isn't there to support an article on Mammadov. The article has been deleted three times (Not counting G13) with no indication factors have changed is the reason I SALTed. Happy to discuss that, but this cycle of a new article without factors having changed isn't productive. Star Mississippi 13:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
Happy New Year! I would like to request the use of the deleted article, Cure Alzheimer's Fund to use as a basis for a much improved version with more citations and notable content. Regretfully, we had not updated the page with this content as part of the deletion discussion. We have more than 1,000 research papers in reputable publications like Neuroscience, Alzheimer's and Dementia, Alzheimer's Research and Therapy, and Science Advances. Our organization has funded nearly $200 million in scientific research since our inception nearly 20 years ago. We fund basic proof of concept research, the kind of research that is the basis of all scientific discovery. Many of our researchers are able to take their ideas after our funding and submit for National Institute of Health (NIH) grants. For example, from 2018-2020 $47 million of our funded projects received $350m in follow on funding from the NIH.
We understand the value of a Wikipedia presence and would like the opportunity to add the necessary information and follow the Wikipedia guidelines.
I would be happy to discuss this topic and appreciate your reading and considering the request.
Have a great day! CureAlzUser ( talk) 17:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
I understand that you have closed the above AfD as redirect, but as of the current moment, it has not been redirected. Was this intentional (which I can understand as the discussion kind of was closed in a stalemate)? - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 11:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey Star Mississippi. Apologies for not creating that Idaho season merger article in time. Do you think you could restore the 1903 season to draftspace to assist me in creating the merger? Thanks. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 03:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Journal of Commercial Biotechnology. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Mach61 ( talk) 03:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for normalizing mention of alternatives to deletion in your AfD closures. Jclemens ( talk) 05:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, first I want to say thank you for closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdulieh Janneh.
Per the decision, "While a redirect would be a viable ATD, there are several places where he's mentioned, there's no clear redirect target. If one is subsequently created, happy to provide the history thereunder.
" -- As the 1992 Olympics was Janneh's most notable competition, I have created a redirect from
Abdulieh Janneh to
The Gambia at the 1992 Summer Olympics. Can you please provide/merge the history of the original page and the corresponding talk page? It would be helpful because there was an unresolved discussion thread on the talk page that I think would be useful to remain on-wiki.
Thank you, -- Habst ( talk) 00:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 37.99.44.129 ( talk) 07:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the discussion at the current AfD. I didn't want to put this into the AfD and muddy the water for new participants, but that was simply a failure of an AfD. It was nominated by an editor who was active for a very short time and whose main business seems to have been nominating articles for deletion; all but this one failed. This AfD should have failed as well. We had only one single reasoned !d vote, accompanied by two garbage !d votes, (one garbage !d vote by an editor who has been banned from AfD for their garbage !d votes, and one more by a sock.) Shame on me for not doing a better job defending the article, it should have been easy based on WP:BUSINESSPERSONOUTCOME. There were so many things going on, and this one seemed so obviously notable to me I let it slide, much to my regret. So anyway, I agree that it's not what has happened since the original AfD that makes the subject notable, the problem is that the original AfD got it wrong. It's one of my worst regrets in the history of my participation in the process. In any case, keep up the good work, I appreciate what you do at AfD, even though I rarely participate any more, I feel I have had a positive effect over the years. If you feel this would be more appropriately discussed in the deletion discussion, I have no objection to it being moved there. Thanks again! — Jacona ( talk) 13:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey, looks like you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attanthangal while I was trying to relist it. I'm of the opinion that pretty much all the keep !votes in that discussion are invalid, as they either make reference to sources not present anywhere in the discussion or article, or else incorrectly assert that WP:POPULATED has been met when the sourcing does not conform to that guideline. I'd recommend relisting it. signed, Rosguill talk 14:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
I added government sources clearly showing Caddebostan is a neighborhood and the population is sourced too????? Youprayteas ( talk) 14:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Just wanted to share with you how crazy this situation got. For all I know, ever since begining when we erased articles we would just remove the links so they dont stay redlinked, and that is it. Removing their mention altogether may leave to such missleading information that is beyond my comprension how others dont understand it. FkpCascais ( talk) 18:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my 2007 Swiss Invasion of Liechtenstein. I will delete it from my sandbox page as it does not meat Wikipedia's guidelines on notability. Cheers! Seisachtheia ( talk) 12:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I did it wrong but I meant to bundle the article List of countries by electricity imports in the nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by electricity exports. Wizmut ( talk) 02:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I have no opinion on the subject but can I ask why you closed this as "soft" delete when there was a Keep !vote? "a nomination has received few or no comments from any editor, and no one has opposed deletion" does not seem to be the case here. Best, - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, this Afd, I find, would at least have deserved a Relist, don't you think? Allmusic and TrouserPress are reliable and those were reviews not just lists of artists.....Anyway, just letting you know I completely disagree with the outcome and even with the idea that there was any consensus at all, and that I'll redirect the page then. Best, - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Greetings Star! Hope all is going very well in your world! I'm wanting to update some of the articles I've created that have outdated links in the references. There seems to be a script, bot or tool that exists that can update the refs so that the original URL remains, and a new url is added that (I think) goes to either the Wayback Machine or to Internet Archive. Would you happen to know what that is? And if not, do you know of an editor I might ask who would be knowledgeable in this sort of thing? Or maybe the HelpDesk? All the best to you, Netherzone ( talk) 15:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
<ref>{{cite web|title=...}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
, would cause the bot to skip that reference. I do not think any special permissions are required to use the bot, but you do have to log in first and allow the tool to make edits on your behalf. –
Epicgenius (
talk) 14:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I understand that there were previous instances where the ‘Franco Lino’ article was created before the player had made a professional appearance, thus being ineligible for an article, and so it has since been locked from being able to be created.
The player has now however made the required professional appearances, and his new article has been created unnecessarily including his middle name in the article title (Franco Osuru Lino), going against the naming convention of footballers.
As I believe you are the one who locked the original article, may I please request that the current article be moved to the more succinct naming title.
Thanks! Olyroo ( talk) 11:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey @ Star Mississippi, I came across an old edit of yours here. Now that EI is depreciated, I’m not sure if the requirement for notability is still met. Could you weigh in on that? Alternatively, if you have other RS, that would also alleviate the issue.
Thank you :) FortunateSons ( talk) 00:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
I noticed that you closed List of NASCAR drivers' AfD yet you failed to delete the article. Was that a mistake or intentional? NW1223< Howl at me• My hunts> 01:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of current National Football League staffs. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ==
BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Star, can you undo/relist the AfD. The ATD redirect would not be an acceptable outcome per the RfD that brought the article to AfD (I was the RfD closer). If the article cannot be improved, merged or redirected to a different target, it would need to be deleted. I didn't really expect the close as redirect, or I would have made my comment at the AfD. Jay 💬 05:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for support and appreciation on my talk. As you know, I have a DYK on the Main page, but my story would be different, about Figaro, - this Figaro. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
story · music · places |
---|
Could you please undel the original Bambino cat and put it at User:SMcCandlish/Incubator/Bambino cat? It seems likely to me that there was some more salvageable material in there that can be merged to List of experimental cat breeds#Bambino (where the very little material we have was moved to. It had originally been shoehorned into Munchkin cat as a subsection, but this was basically a WP:CFORK, since we're keeping the experimental crossbreeds info in the list article, not in articles on foundation-stock breeds (except as cross-references to the list article). If what's in the deleted version seems like utter trash, don't bother, but I'm hoping for some bits that can be extracted, even if it requires a little more sourcing work. The list entry at present is really skeletal. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Star Mississippi, hope your well, i could be missing something but i thought the consensus was to keep the page from deletion on the discussion page? There had been an incident on X (Twitter) since the artist started gaining more popularity online, where a few X accounts that took issue with the artist's song lyrics had made threats about deleting his wikipedia page due to personal dislike for the act, then a day later a deletion page was created. There isn't really much to disagree with in terms of him being a known act in Scandinavia, the issue was the sources on the page being outdated or not of use, but that just required updating. NorHux ( talk) 14:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
S0091 ( talk) 14:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Hello, Star Mississippi,
I'm here because of a strange little glitch. When I see your signature or you listed in a page history, the link to your User talk page is a pink link, not a blue link. Typically pink links mean a page is part of some deletion processes so I come to your User talk page to see if it is mistakenly tagged but I don't see a problem. I also looked at your signature on this page and you don't have a link to your User talk page. So, I'm not sure what is up. See the Move log and search for your name to see what I mean. Of course, I use scripts that use colors to identify different statuses and you might not have them installed. But I thought I'd mention it in case there is something wrong.
I hope you have a pleasant weekend. Was expecting rain but it never arrived here. Liz Read! Talk! 03:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Is this a G12 or RD1 action? The decline is RD1, but no range of edits were indicated. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Dear Mississippi, I fail to see why this article was deleted. Several credible independent sources were offered that have made this person subject of their deep coverage. Drako ( talk) 02:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jahanshah Javid. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Drako ( talk) 02:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
TheRajeshJoshi( talk) 06:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Just a quick heads up that I sent you a brief email. Netherzone ( talk) 23:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Happy with your closure, but did you notice the replies were from socks? Doug Weller talk 12:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
I have eliminated all citations coming from FamilySearch as requested, I would like to resubmit for review my article. Thank you in advance for your consideration to this matter. Fjnovoa ( talk) 16:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
I have added this paragraph, so the subject can pass WP:NPOL
"Dr. Novoa Meléndez legacy belongs to a family that has earned local political notoriety in public service in El Salvador in the 19th and 20th centuries: his father Adolfo Novoa Méndez was Trustee of the City Counsil (Síndico in Spanish) of Sensuntepeque Municipality in 1880, his son Fidel Antonio Novoa Fuentes was a congressman in 1929, both his grandsons Fidel Antonio Novoa Arciniegas was the Mayor of San Salvador in 1964 and Ricardo Armando Novoa Arciniegas was a Judge of the Supreme Court of Justice of El Salvador in 1989."
I have added secondary citation too.
Kindly, could you please reinstate my article. I have put long hours into my project. Fjnovoa ( talk) 20:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Star Mississippi,
On my article referenced above, I got rid of all the citations from FamilySearch. I have deleted paragraphs to make more summarized and shorter. I am using citation 1, 10 and 12 as secondary sources. Would you kindly review it and advise any changes for improvement and gaining approval?
Thank you in advance,
@ Fjnovoa Fjnovoa ( talk) 01:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Star Mississippi, For the above referenced article I have added secondary sources, [8] which is another Wikipedia article. Your review, advise and corrections would be highly appreciated.
@ Fjnovoa Fjnovoa ( talk) 17:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Hellow StarMississippi,
I am seeking some advice and help please. The articles I have written and submitted for review and approval in English, I was simultaneously translating to Spanish and submitting them too. In the Spanish Wikipedia they were all deleted. As I have learned today, there was an old accusation regarding my user ID from 2013, which I will explain below, in the Spanish language Wikipedia. A comment has been written as if I was attempting to do something with nefarious intent, plagiarizing from another article in the web. But the main issue is that user Taichi has blocked my account, and user Ontzak goes and deletes my requests for review of my blocked account. The later will not give me an explanation why he/she is doing that, and I do not want this blocking to affect my articles nor my user ID in the English language Wikipedia.
Here is my explanation of the misunderstanding, which has been deleted with no explanation an my US ID has a flag that my account is "Special purpose account" (In spanish: Cuenta de propósito particular):
{{unblock|reason you should be unblocked}}
I started my articles on www.geocities.com and tried unsuccessfully to copy them to Wikipedia in Spanish back in 2013, since www.geocities.com was closed. I was accused of plagiarism, which makes no sense when I was the author of said proposed articles.
Recently, I restarted my new initiative of submitting my articles for approval. It is not correct that for 10 years I have tried to insert my ancestors. Duly, and in compliance with Wikipedia's policy, I have declared my conflict of interest on my user page. The fact that this contributor may be personally related to the topic or subject of an article does not prevent him from originally writing a neutral professional point of view on a political historical article on the topic or article. More importantly, the contributor, because he may be personally related, has provided a wealth of firsthand data, knows through oral tradition and provides supporting citations, is an authority on research and research for many years on the subject.
Therefore, it can be argued that it is a biographical article (not autobiographical, since the contributor does not contribute about himself), which has a political historical significance; or, on the other hand, a biography of historical political importance that turns out to be contributed by a personal and well-versed person. My articles have been reviewed by academic historians (third parties) who are not personally or professionally related to the contributor or to the topic or subject, analyzing the sources and citations. And in his opinion, although there may be a conflict of interest or a moral hazard, it is a neutral point of view, and duly disclosed on the contributor's user page, as is Wikipedia's policy.
Being blocked and derogatory information about me affects me a lot. My ancestors are remarkable people, and my initiative is only that the truth be published.
Explanatory note: www.geocities.com was part of www.yahoo.com at the beginning of the internet, and when the multinational AT&T bought www.yahoo.com; AT&T was not interested in the web hosting business, and let the website shut down and lose us customers or contributors. My articles existed in the space of www.geocities.com under the web hosting www.novoa.org. Now all my created pages are in the "dark web", and they have malware and viruses when you try to access them. If I wish to migrate my work to Wikipedia in Spanish, it is precisely to avoid losing my investigative work of more than 45 years Fjnovoa ( talk) 22:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello @ Star Mississippi Thank you for your comment.
I am basing on the Meridian-Webster definition #2: denotes the deputy appointed officer at an embassy. I quote next from such reference
noun con·sul ˈkän(t)-səl Definition
Synonyms of consul
Definition of consul
Fjnovoa ( talk) 03:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hi @ Star Mississippi Kindly, could you please remove the message/comment left for me in the maintenance section, that is in the article page, that reads "Unlike those who held political office, I'm not sure about Tavera's notability as ambassadors are not inherently notable. This one will be a challenge due to age of sourcing, but I'm not going to decline as I think it's borderline". I believe that I have remediated this, by changing the inforbox in html from office holder to writer, and the office no longer reflects that the subject was a diplomat in the infobox. Moreover, the sentence that used to be in the Achievements sections stating the subject was a consul general has been moved to the Early Life section, with the intent that the focus is not an ambassador, but rather a historian and writer, as well as Pre-Columbian art collector, and a collector of manuscripts and renown paintings of Colombia. Your consideration is much appreciated. Fjnovoa ( talk) 15:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
|
@ Rosguill, Daniel, Deepfriedokra, Netherzone, and Theroadislong: my apologies for that headache you had to deal with. Especially the baseless harassment allegations. I really did believe they were editing in good faith. Le sigh. Thanks again. Star Mississippi 15:07, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
I started spot-checking the content against what the sources actually say in this article Fidel Novoa Meléndez by FJN. I've removed some of the content that definitely was not backed up by some of the sources. A lot of the article seems to be word-of-mouth, family-based oral history, or other original research. Other parts check out, and while I'm not disputing his notability, I think this editor's creations that were deleted from es-wiki need to be checked against what the sources actually say (which are primarily in Spanish). Netherzone ( talk) 17:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Your signature and {{ drv top}} really don't seem to get on too well. No idea why. I tried troubleshooting for like 5mins and couldn't work it out - the only way I fixed it at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 February 17 was to close it myself and then copy-paste your sig in. More as an FYI as I don't know why it's happening! Daniel ( talk) 22:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 |
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, people's rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ― Buster7 ☎
Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Spicy ( talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Did you know that according to this, you're my biggest fan? I don't use the thanks button that often but I assure you the feeling is mutual. Best wishes for the holiday season.
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks @ Spicy:. I so appreciate all your help at SPI. Happy holidays to you and your loved ones. All the best for 2024. Star Mississippi 19:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Holiday greetings and wishes for a new year filled with light and magic! | |
Hi Star Mississippi, Best wishes during this holiday season for peace, prosperity, health, happiness, and of course fun and good food. Oh and cute animals, like raccoons and glow-in-the-dark foxes. I have really enjoyed working together on various projects here, and am grateful to have you as a friendly fellow editor. Thank you for everything you do for the encyclopedia and this community. |
Onel5969 TT me 02:37, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Star, and happy new year. I just noticed that CT55555 has not edited since September. I'm sorry to see that they are taking an extended leave, and hope they come back. Any idea why they may have left? I miss seeing them around! Netherzone ( talk) 00:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, hope you doing well. I wanted to ask you about the said draft article. I have further worked on it, updated the article and added more citations. I wanted you to have a look into it and give your opinion whether it's ready for mainspace or not. Thanks, Happy New Year! IBuNeriPK ( talk) 18:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
I am not sure I understand the deletion, or the delete arguments, you had citations in the article, a mix of, the addition of the previous AfD had Article 1, Article 2, Article 3, Article 4, Article 5, USAID Press Release, Article 6. Posted by PiccklePiclePikel ... So I was under the impression there should be more than enough for GNG. So is the AfD down to just a numbers voting game again? Because there certainly wasn't any in-depth discussion from one delete argument to me. So you'd have to forgive me, but I can't see how it deserves to be a SALT option. The guy is very wealthy and one of the top elites of the country, who contributes in somewhat political circles. I am against SALTing. Govvy ( talk) 09:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
the guy is very wealthy and one of the top elites of the country, who contributes in somewhat political circles.and
I've seen far worse off articles on American representation get kept for less.are not arguments that are going to hold up as a keep or convince someone to review their decision. Something he mentioned (that's literally it and the same here and here, a quote) aren't enough to pass notability and they're definitely not independent. Even ones like this which you didn't call a press release are exactly that. If you believe my close is wrong, I support a DRV, but the sourcing isn't there to support an article on Mammadov. The article has been deleted three times (Not counting G13) with no indication factors have changed is the reason I SALTed. Happy to discuss that, but this cycle of a new article without factors having changed isn't productive. Star Mississippi 13:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
Happy New Year! I would like to request the use of the deleted article, Cure Alzheimer's Fund to use as a basis for a much improved version with more citations and notable content. Regretfully, we had not updated the page with this content as part of the deletion discussion. We have more than 1,000 research papers in reputable publications like Neuroscience, Alzheimer's and Dementia, Alzheimer's Research and Therapy, and Science Advances. Our organization has funded nearly $200 million in scientific research since our inception nearly 20 years ago. We fund basic proof of concept research, the kind of research that is the basis of all scientific discovery. Many of our researchers are able to take their ideas after our funding and submit for National Institute of Health (NIH) grants. For example, from 2018-2020 $47 million of our funded projects received $350m in follow on funding from the NIH.
We understand the value of a Wikipedia presence and would like the opportunity to add the necessary information and follow the Wikipedia guidelines.
I would be happy to discuss this topic and appreciate your reading and considering the request.
Have a great day! CureAlzUser ( talk) 17:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
I understand that you have closed the above AfD as redirect, but as of the current moment, it has not been redirected. Was this intentional (which I can understand as the discussion kind of was closed in a stalemate)? - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 11:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey Star Mississippi. Apologies for not creating that Idaho season merger article in time. Do you think you could restore the 1903 season to draftspace to assist me in creating the merger? Thanks. BeanieFan11 ( talk) 03:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Journal of Commercial Biotechnology. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Mach61 ( talk) 03:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for normalizing mention of alternatives to deletion in your AfD closures. Jclemens ( talk) 05:19, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, first I want to say thank you for closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdulieh Janneh.
Per the decision, "While a redirect would be a viable ATD, there are several places where he's mentioned, there's no clear redirect target. If one is subsequently created, happy to provide the history thereunder.
" -- As the 1992 Olympics was Janneh's most notable competition, I have created a redirect from
Abdulieh Janneh to
The Gambia at the 1992 Summer Olympics. Can you please provide/merge the history of the original page and the corresponding talk page? It would be helpful because there was an unresolved discussion thread on the talk page that I think would be useful to remain on-wiki.
Thank you, -- Habst ( talk) 00:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 37.99.44.129 ( talk) 07:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the discussion at the current AfD. I didn't want to put this into the AfD and muddy the water for new participants, but that was simply a failure of an AfD. It was nominated by an editor who was active for a very short time and whose main business seems to have been nominating articles for deletion; all but this one failed. This AfD should have failed as well. We had only one single reasoned !d vote, accompanied by two garbage !d votes, (one garbage !d vote by an editor who has been banned from AfD for their garbage !d votes, and one more by a sock.) Shame on me for not doing a better job defending the article, it should have been easy based on WP:BUSINESSPERSONOUTCOME. There were so many things going on, and this one seemed so obviously notable to me I let it slide, much to my regret. So anyway, I agree that it's not what has happened since the original AfD that makes the subject notable, the problem is that the original AfD got it wrong. It's one of my worst regrets in the history of my participation in the process. In any case, keep up the good work, I appreciate what you do at AfD, even though I rarely participate any more, I feel I have had a positive effect over the years. If you feel this would be more appropriately discussed in the deletion discussion, I have no objection to it being moved there. Thanks again! — Jacona ( talk) 13:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey, looks like you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attanthangal while I was trying to relist it. I'm of the opinion that pretty much all the keep !votes in that discussion are invalid, as they either make reference to sources not present anywhere in the discussion or article, or else incorrectly assert that WP:POPULATED has been met when the sourcing does not conform to that guideline. I'd recommend relisting it. signed, Rosguill talk 14:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
I added government sources clearly showing Caddebostan is a neighborhood and the population is sourced too????? Youprayteas ( talk) 14:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Just wanted to share with you how crazy this situation got. For all I know, ever since begining when we erased articles we would just remove the links so they dont stay redlinked, and that is it. Removing their mention altogether may leave to such missleading information that is beyond my comprension how others dont understand it. FkpCascais ( talk) 18:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my 2007 Swiss Invasion of Liechtenstein. I will delete it from my sandbox page as it does not meat Wikipedia's guidelines on notability. Cheers! Seisachtheia ( talk) 12:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I did it wrong but I meant to bundle the article List of countries by electricity imports in the nomination Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries by electricity exports. Wizmut ( talk) 02:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I have no opinion on the subject but can I ask why you closed this as "soft" delete when there was a Keep !vote? "a nomination has received few or no comments from any editor, and no one has opposed deletion" does not seem to be the case here. Best, - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, this Afd, I find, would at least have deserved a Relist, don't you think? Allmusic and TrouserPress are reliable and those were reviews not just lists of artists.....Anyway, just letting you know I completely disagree with the outcome and even with the idea that there was any consensus at all, and that I'll redirect the page then. Best, - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Greetings Star! Hope all is going very well in your world! I'm wanting to update some of the articles I've created that have outdated links in the references. There seems to be a script, bot or tool that exists that can update the refs so that the original URL remains, and a new url is added that (I think) goes to either the Wayback Machine or to Internet Archive. Would you happen to know what that is? And if not, do you know of an editor I might ask who would be knowledgeable in this sort of thing? Or maybe the HelpDesk? All the best to you, Netherzone ( talk) 15:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
<ref>{{cite web|title=...}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
, would cause the bot to skip that reference. I do not think any special permissions are required to use the bot, but you do have to log in first and allow the tool to make edits on your behalf. –
Epicgenius (
talk) 14:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello,
I understand that there were previous instances where the ‘Franco Lino’ article was created before the player had made a professional appearance, thus being ineligible for an article, and so it has since been locked from being able to be created.
The player has now however made the required professional appearances, and his new article has been created unnecessarily including his middle name in the article title (Franco Osuru Lino), going against the naming convention of footballers.
As I believe you are the one who locked the original article, may I please request that the current article be moved to the more succinct naming title.
Thanks! Olyroo ( talk) 11:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey @ Star Mississippi, I came across an old edit of yours here. Now that EI is depreciated, I’m not sure if the requirement for notability is still met. Could you weigh in on that? Alternatively, if you have other RS, that would also alleviate the issue.
Thank you :) FortunateSons ( talk) 00:04, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
I noticed that you closed List of NASCAR drivers' AfD yet you failed to delete the article. Was that a mistake or intentional? NW1223< Howl at me• My hunts> 01:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of current National Football League staffs. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ==
BeanieFan11 ( talk) 20:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Star, can you undo/relist the AfD. The ATD redirect would not be an acceptable outcome per the RfD that brought the article to AfD (I was the RfD closer). If the article cannot be improved, merged or redirected to a different target, it would need to be deleted. I didn't really expect the close as redirect, or I would have made my comment at the AfD. Jay 💬 05:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for support and appreciation on my talk. As you know, I have a DYK on the Main page, but my story would be different, about Figaro, - this Figaro. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:31, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
story · music · places |
---|
Could you please undel the original Bambino cat and put it at User:SMcCandlish/Incubator/Bambino cat? It seems likely to me that there was some more salvageable material in there that can be merged to List of experimental cat breeds#Bambino (where the very little material we have was moved to. It had originally been shoehorned into Munchkin cat as a subsection, but this was basically a WP:CFORK, since we're keeping the experimental crossbreeds info in the list article, not in articles on foundation-stock breeds (except as cross-references to the list article). If what's in the deleted version seems like utter trash, don't bother, but I'm hoping for some bits that can be extracted, even if it requires a little more sourcing work. The list entry at present is really skeletal. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi Star Mississippi, hope your well, i could be missing something but i thought the consensus was to keep the page from deletion on the discussion page? There had been an incident on X (Twitter) since the artist started gaining more popularity online, where a few X accounts that took issue with the artist's song lyrics had made threats about deleting his wikipedia page due to personal dislike for the act, then a day later a deletion page was created. There isn't really much to disagree with in terms of him being a known act in Scandinavia, the issue was the sources on the page being outdated or not of use, but that just required updating. NorHux ( talk) 14:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
S0091 ( talk) 14:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Hello, Star Mississippi,
I'm here because of a strange little glitch. When I see your signature or you listed in a page history, the link to your User talk page is a pink link, not a blue link. Typically pink links mean a page is part of some deletion processes so I come to your User talk page to see if it is mistakenly tagged but I don't see a problem. I also looked at your signature on this page and you don't have a link to your User talk page. So, I'm not sure what is up. See the Move log and search for your name to see what I mean. Of course, I use scripts that use colors to identify different statuses and you might not have them installed. But I thought I'd mention it in case there is something wrong.
I hope you have a pleasant weekend. Was expecting rain but it never arrived here. Liz Read! Talk! 03:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Is this a G12 or RD1 action? The decline is RD1, but no range of edits were indicated. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Dear Mississippi, I fail to see why this article was deleted. Several credible independent sources were offered that have made this person subject of their deep coverage. Drako ( talk) 02:10, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jahanshah Javid. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Drako ( talk) 02:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
TheRajeshJoshi( talk) 06:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello! Just a quick heads up that I sent you a brief email. Netherzone ( talk) 23:54, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Happy with your closure, but did you notice the replies were from socks? Doug Weller talk 12:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
I have eliminated all citations coming from FamilySearch as requested, I would like to resubmit for review my article. Thank you in advance for your consideration to this matter. Fjnovoa ( talk) 16:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
I have added this paragraph, so the subject can pass WP:NPOL
"Dr. Novoa Meléndez legacy belongs to a family that has earned local political notoriety in public service in El Salvador in the 19th and 20th centuries: his father Adolfo Novoa Méndez was Trustee of the City Counsil (Síndico in Spanish) of Sensuntepeque Municipality in 1880, his son Fidel Antonio Novoa Fuentes was a congressman in 1929, both his grandsons Fidel Antonio Novoa Arciniegas was the Mayor of San Salvador in 1964 and Ricardo Armando Novoa Arciniegas was a Judge of the Supreme Court of Justice of El Salvador in 1989."
I have added secondary citation too.
Kindly, could you please reinstate my article. I have put long hours into my project. Fjnovoa ( talk) 20:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello Star Mississippi,
On my article referenced above, I got rid of all the citations from FamilySearch. I have deleted paragraphs to make more summarized and shorter. I am using citation 1, 10 and 12 as secondary sources. Would you kindly review it and advise any changes for improvement and gaining approval?
Thank you in advance,
@ Fjnovoa Fjnovoa ( talk) 01:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Star Mississippi, For the above referenced article I have added secondary sources, [8] which is another Wikipedia article. Your review, advise and corrections would be highly appreciated.
@ Fjnovoa Fjnovoa ( talk) 17:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Hellow StarMississippi,
I am seeking some advice and help please. The articles I have written and submitted for review and approval in English, I was simultaneously translating to Spanish and submitting them too. In the Spanish Wikipedia they were all deleted. As I have learned today, there was an old accusation regarding my user ID from 2013, which I will explain below, in the Spanish language Wikipedia. A comment has been written as if I was attempting to do something with nefarious intent, plagiarizing from another article in the web. But the main issue is that user Taichi has blocked my account, and user Ontzak goes and deletes my requests for review of my blocked account. The later will not give me an explanation why he/she is doing that, and I do not want this blocking to affect my articles nor my user ID in the English language Wikipedia.
Here is my explanation of the misunderstanding, which has been deleted with no explanation an my US ID has a flag that my account is "Special purpose account" (In spanish: Cuenta de propósito particular):
{{unblock|reason you should be unblocked}}
I started my articles on www.geocities.com and tried unsuccessfully to copy them to Wikipedia in Spanish back in 2013, since www.geocities.com was closed. I was accused of plagiarism, which makes no sense when I was the author of said proposed articles.
Recently, I restarted my new initiative of submitting my articles for approval. It is not correct that for 10 years I have tried to insert my ancestors. Duly, and in compliance with Wikipedia's policy, I have declared my conflict of interest on my user page. The fact that this contributor may be personally related to the topic or subject of an article does not prevent him from originally writing a neutral professional point of view on a political historical article on the topic or article. More importantly, the contributor, because he may be personally related, has provided a wealth of firsthand data, knows through oral tradition and provides supporting citations, is an authority on research and research for many years on the subject.
Therefore, it can be argued that it is a biographical article (not autobiographical, since the contributor does not contribute about himself), which has a political historical significance; or, on the other hand, a biography of historical political importance that turns out to be contributed by a personal and well-versed person. My articles have been reviewed by academic historians (third parties) who are not personally or professionally related to the contributor or to the topic or subject, analyzing the sources and citations. And in his opinion, although there may be a conflict of interest or a moral hazard, it is a neutral point of view, and duly disclosed on the contributor's user page, as is Wikipedia's policy.
Being blocked and derogatory information about me affects me a lot. My ancestors are remarkable people, and my initiative is only that the truth be published.
Explanatory note: www.geocities.com was part of www.yahoo.com at the beginning of the internet, and when the multinational AT&T bought www.yahoo.com; AT&T was not interested in the web hosting business, and let the website shut down and lose us customers or contributors. My articles existed in the space of www.geocities.com under the web hosting www.novoa.org. Now all my created pages are in the "dark web", and they have malware and viruses when you try to access them. If I wish to migrate my work to Wikipedia in Spanish, it is precisely to avoid losing my investigative work of more than 45 years Fjnovoa ( talk) 22:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hello @ Star Mississippi Thank you for your comment.
I am basing on the Meridian-Webster definition #2: denotes the deputy appointed officer at an embassy. I quote next from such reference
noun con·sul ˈkän(t)-səl Definition
Synonyms of consul
Definition of consul
Fjnovoa ( talk) 03:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
|
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hi @ Star Mississippi Kindly, could you please remove the message/comment left for me in the maintenance section, that is in the article page, that reads "Unlike those who held political office, I'm not sure about Tavera's notability as ambassadors are not inherently notable. This one will be a challenge due to age of sourcing, but I'm not going to decline as I think it's borderline". I believe that I have remediated this, by changing the inforbox in html from office holder to writer, and the office no longer reflects that the subject was a diplomat in the infobox. Moreover, the sentence that used to be in the Achievements sections stating the subject was a consul general has been moved to the Early Life section, with the intent that the focus is not an ambassador, but rather a historian and writer, as well as Pre-Columbian art collector, and a collector of manuscripts and renown paintings of Colombia. Your consideration is much appreciated. Fjnovoa ( talk) 15:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
|
@ Rosguill, Daniel, Deepfriedokra, Netherzone, and Theroadislong: my apologies for that headache you had to deal with. Especially the baseless harassment allegations. I really did believe they were editing in good faith. Le sigh. Thanks again. Star Mississippi 15:07, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
I started spot-checking the content against what the sources actually say in this article Fidel Novoa Meléndez by FJN. I've removed some of the content that definitely was not backed up by some of the sources. A lot of the article seems to be word-of-mouth, family-based oral history, or other original research. Other parts check out, and while I'm not disputing his notability, I think this editor's creations that were deleted from es-wiki need to be checked against what the sources actually say (which are primarily in Spanish). Netherzone ( talk) 17:58, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Your signature and {{ drv top}} really don't seem to get on too well. No idea why. I tried troubleshooting for like 5mins and couldn't work it out - the only way I fixed it at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 February 17 was to close it myself and then copy-paste your sig in. More as an FYI as I don't know why it's happening! Daniel ( talk) 22:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)