Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Hi, I noticed that you posted a bot request at WP:BOTREQ for a bot to clear all of the subcategories of Category:Terrorists, which has been deleted. I'd be happy to complete this— it's really simple— but I checked the subcats involved and they appear to be empty. Please read what I wrote on that request. Regards, The Earwig ( Talk | Contributions) 03:15, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
congrats for winning the uphill battle in CAT:TERRORIST. I gave you a snowball's chance in hell, but apparently, hell froze over. I suppose we will be entitled to a second serving at DRV, but still, it is a very good first step. Thanks for your unflinching stance and stamina on this one. Jasy jatere ( talk) 07:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Sceptre, I removed your comment just for now because all I/we am/are currently looking for it suggestions. We will get into the voting later - hope you dont mind. regards-- Vintagekits ( talk) 13:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
What on earth has been going on on my page? I haven't even been DOING anything lately....why am I the target all of a sudden? Gee, really makes me want to dive back into the wikiworld. :P K. Lásztocska talk 17:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Goodness, I think I see what you mean. Great welcome back, Wiki.... K. Lásztocska talk 23:07, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, rather than constantly subverting them, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. Right now many if not most users who have been banned are still active here, but they are here as socks or anonymous IPs who may or may not be constructive. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. -- Brangifer ( talk) 04:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
This user is a participant of the WikiProject User Rehab |
Feel free to put this anywhere on your user page. To edit this box for improvement
click here
I Seek To Help & Repair! ( talk) 07:56, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered for the WikiCup by ROBOTIC GARDEN at 09:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.
Pfeh - teach me for giving the benefit of a doubt at WP:WikiProject User Rehab. Undoubted troll sock whatever of someone. I sent it to AIV, but if you get there first, enjoy. - 2/0 ( cont.) 23:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes. It's a serious proposal. Stop reverting my proposal to merge this with House (TV Series). This amounts to vandalism on your part. George Pelltier ( talk) 17:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I should've known better than to Pokemon Wikiproject? ;> – xeno talk 18:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Disruptive warning template removed
C.U.T.K.D
T |
C 12:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey, you and User:George Pelltier seem to be in a content dispute over the moveproposal tag on Thirteen (House) While I do not think the proposal is a good idea myself, could you please leave the tag up until the discussion on the talk page is closed? Oldlaptop321 ( talk) 15:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. C.U.T.K.D T | C 17:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure what to make of it, but you are mentioned at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2009_May_21#Autistic_spectre. Regards, Skomorokh 21:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 20:07, 23 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.
The following motion was carried 9 to 0 (with 2 recusals and 1 abstention) further to this request to amend the Fringe science arbitration case:
The remedy has been entered onto the arbitration case page, at #Further motion following Request for Amendment (May 2009).
For the Arbitration Committee,
AGK 14:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
This is just a quick reminder that the round ends this Friday, May 29, 2009. I wanted to let you guys know the current standings. If you are very close, but not close enough, work as hard as possible these next two days. Pool leaders are listed as usual, and under the 10 wildcards, are competitors that are still fighting for a spot. Also, if you currently have any un-reviewed GAN's up and you'd like them to be reviewed and counted for this round, you must place them on the appropriate thread of the WikiCup talk page.
GARDEN , iMatthew : Chat , and The Helpful One The Helpful Bot 00:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Torchwood Institute for a community review of its GA status, which can be found here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in weighing in on the discussion. Please comment there for ways of improving the article and helping it to maintain its GA status. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Regarding this revert: just because it was described as being violation of a ArbCom sanction (technically, it wasn't), doesn't mean it should be reverted on sight. Do you have any evidence suggesting this gentleman had this title you reverted to? Because the three obits I found do not mention it. [1] [2] [3]. Rockpocke t 07:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 14:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.
Hi there, I was wondering if you have had the chance to review the FAC article as per your comment on the talk page. Don't mean to rush you or anything but it's been filibustering for a while now with few editorial reviews and I would like to see a conclusion or some more editing advice. Thanks. Rafablu88 ( talk) 18:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I see that you speedily kept Karen Gillan on the grounds of WP:SNOW using a non-admin closure. I am uncertain whether this was an appropriate application of non-admin closure. WP:NAC explicitly says that WP:SNOW should not be used for non-admin closures, and generally favours leaving discussions open for at least 5 days, whereas you closed this AfD down in a mere 23 minutes. I think you were probably right in that this article was never going to get deleted, but I thought it might be useful to discuss the approach taken in this case. Bondegezou ( talk) 10:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello Sceptre, just so you know, I've removed your IP Block Exemption as it appears that the block that was originally affecting you when I placed it has expired. If you are having any further difficulty editing, please let us know. Thanks! Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 16:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm suggesting we ask for mediation to help build teh guidance at Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). What I propose is that a mediator be the only person to edit the project page itself and be the one to guide discussion and discern consensus. I've proposed it at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Mediation. As a past participant in the lengthy debates, I'd appreciate your input and hopefully your agreement. Hiding T 10:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know I've begun GA reviews on both Matt Smith (actor) and Planet of the Dead. Cheers! Vicenarian ( T · C) 20:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
The
Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 26 - May 2009 | |
|
|
SoxBot ( talk) 10:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Royal broil 15:50, 6 June 2009 (UTC)It's possible, which is why I chose not to warn the user or anything of the like. Andrea ( talk) 21:57, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
You're going to have to explain how those aren't peacock terms before just removing them and claiming they aren't. They clearly are. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_peacock_terms —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rustydangerfield ( talk • contribs) 20:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter (last week) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The WikiCup Newsletter (this week) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.
I have noticed you have previously shown interest in the naming of the Macedonia-related articles. I want to inform you about the opening of Wikipedia:Centralized_discussion/Macedonia discussion. I'd like to ask you if you will be interested to add your proposals found in Talk:Macedonia#My_two_cents in the discussion pages or contribute in other ways with your input there? Thank you. Shadowmorph ^"^ 17:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to bother you but the FAC people are being really anal and want supporting users to additionally state whether they believe the sources to be reliable because Ealdgyth left them to the editors' discretion (no idea why especially as I fulfilled his criteria). Could you pop back and add your thoughts about them to your support? Thanks. Rafablu88 ( talk) 15:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Chuck Norris Messiah Juice ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. gordonrox24 ( talk) 19:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I just made then reverted the following comment at AN/I. I'm posting it here because this is mostly a suggestion for you...
Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 09:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above.
Non-compliance to the above are grounds for blocking for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling.
The probation on articles relating to Barack Obama will be reviewed by a group of involved and non-involved editors and administrators to see how effective it has been. The process will last two weeks. After the two weeks elapse, the working group will provide their findings to us and the community, and will outline how the article probation will run in the future.
- For the Arbitration Committee, Mailer Diablo 15:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.
Talk:List_of_Wii_games#Merge_proposal. Please partake in the merge proposal. Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 01:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
We're holding a preferential vote to decide what proposals should go forward to the community and narrow down the vast selection that we currently have. Since you've commented at the above discussion, I thought you would appreciate the opportunity to participate Fritzpoll ( talk) 08:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Since you have in the past taken part in related discussions, this comes as a notification that the Centralized discussion page set up to decide on a comprehensive naming convention about Macedonia-related naming practices is now inviting comments on a number of competing proposals from the community. Please register your opinions on the RfC subpages 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Shadowmorph ^"^ 21:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't consider precedence an argument on WP. To what extend does WP consider precedence an argument? Thanks. - Pecoc ( talk) 17:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered for the WikiCup by ROBOTIC GARDEN at 21:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.
The
Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 27 - June 2009 | |
|
|
SoxBot ( talk) 22:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by – Juliancolton | Talk 16:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC).
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I have conducted a GA reassessment of this article and have found a few minor referencing concerns which may be viewed at Talk:Flying the Flag (for You)/GA1. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 23:03, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
I see you didn't have an easy life on WP either during the time I was gone. No, I don't think that was the problem, since there are dozens of editors at least as "invested in [their] political views" still pretty active in EE topics (and probably in other topics). The problem was my big mouth and the fact I called a spade a spade a bit to often for WP admin's taste. I also hoped WP had changed, but in the short time since I've been back I've already seen gross assumptions of bad faith, tendentious commentaries about fellow editors and even editors opposing a suggestion just because it came from me. WP is still too myspace-like, were sentiments between editors are more important that the content itself (I a short incursion in a topic that isn't part of my main editing interests I've seen otherwise correct editors supporting articles that go against all the "what Wikipedia is not" for reasons that had little to do with the actual content), so that even the most neutral editors have to chose a "side" to continue their productive editing. I think we'll just have to wait until en.WP becomes mainstream in EE. Anonimu ( talk) 11:57, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey there. If you have the time, could you have a look at my new FAC Silent Alarm like you did for Fantasy Black Channel and if possible give a verdict? It's been there for a while now and we're trying to get a consensus or obtain further advice. Thanks. Rafablu88 20:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Cool, thanks for that. And we may or may not end up with things like "X (Skins series 3 episode)" after series 4. I'll try and dig up some references for Cassie and get back to you later! :) — 97198 ( talk) 04:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Hi, I noticed that you posted a bot request at WP:BOTREQ for a bot to clear all of the subcategories of Category:Terrorists, which has been deleted. I'd be happy to complete this— it's really simple— but I checked the subcats involved and they appear to be empty. Please read what I wrote on that request. Regards, The Earwig ( Talk | Contributions) 03:15, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
congrats for winning the uphill battle in CAT:TERRORIST. I gave you a snowball's chance in hell, but apparently, hell froze over. I suppose we will be entitled to a second serving at DRV, but still, it is a very good first step. Thanks for your unflinching stance and stamina on this one. Jasy jatere ( talk) 07:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi Sceptre, I removed your comment just for now because all I/we am/are currently looking for it suggestions. We will get into the voting later - hope you dont mind. regards-- Vintagekits ( talk) 13:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
What on earth has been going on on my page? I haven't even been DOING anything lately....why am I the target all of a sudden? Gee, really makes me want to dive back into the wikiworld. :P K. Lásztocska talk 17:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Goodness, I think I see what you mean. Great welcome back, Wiki.... K. Lásztocska talk 23:07, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Would you be interested in joining this project? We need more editors who share a burden for rescuing promising editors who have gotten into serious trouble because of behavioral issues. IF (a fundamental condition!) they are interested in reforming and adapting to our standards of conduct, and are also willing to abide by our policies and guidelines, rather than constantly subverting them, we can offer to help them return to Wikipedia as constructive editors. Right now many if not most users who have been banned are still active here, but they are here as socks or anonymous IPs who may or may not be constructive. We should offer them a proper way to return. If you think this is a good idea, please join us. -- Brangifer ( talk) 04:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
This user is a participant of the WikiProject User Rehab |
Feel free to put this anywhere on your user page. To edit this box for improvement
click here
I Seek To Help & Repair! ( talk) 07:56, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered for the WikiCup by ROBOTIC GARDEN at 09:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.
Pfeh - teach me for giving the benefit of a doubt at WP:WikiProject User Rehab. Undoubted troll sock whatever of someone. I sent it to AIV, but if you get there first, enjoy. - 2/0 ( cont.) 23:15, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes. It's a serious proposal. Stop reverting my proposal to merge this with House (TV Series). This amounts to vandalism on your part. George Pelltier ( talk) 17:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
I should've known better than to Pokemon Wikiproject? ;> – xeno talk 18:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Disruptive warning template removed
C.U.T.K.D
T |
C 12:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey, you and User:George Pelltier seem to be in a content dispute over the moveproposal tag on Thirteen (House) While I do not think the proposal is a good idea myself, could you please leave the tag up until the discussion on the talk page is closed? Oldlaptop321 ( talk) 15:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. C.U.T.K.D T | C 17:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure what to make of it, but you are mentioned at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2009_May_21#Autistic_spectre. Regards, Skomorokh 21:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 20:07, 23 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.
The following motion was carried 9 to 0 (with 2 recusals and 1 abstention) further to this request to amend the Fringe science arbitration case:
The remedy has been entered onto the arbitration case page, at #Further motion following Request for Amendment (May 2009).
For the Arbitration Committee,
AGK 14:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
This is just a quick reminder that the round ends this Friday, May 29, 2009. I wanted to let you guys know the current standings. If you are very close, but not close enough, work as hard as possible these next two days. Pool leaders are listed as usual, and under the 10 wildcards, are competitors that are still fighting for a spot. Also, if you currently have any un-reviewed GAN's up and you'd like them to be reviewed and counted for this round, you must place them on the appropriate thread of the WikiCup talk page.
GARDEN , iMatthew : Chat , and The Helpful One The Helpful Bot 00:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Torchwood Institute for a community review of its GA status, which can be found here. Since you are a main contributor of the article (determined based on this tool), I figured you would be interested in weighing in on the discussion. Please comment there for ways of improving the article and helping it to maintain its GA status. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:41, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Regarding this revert: just because it was described as being violation of a ArbCom sanction (technically, it wasn't), doesn't mean it should be reverted on sight. Do you have any evidence suggesting this gentleman had this title you reverted to? Because the three obits I found do not mention it. [1] [2] [3]. Rockpocke t 07:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered for the WikiCup by The Helpful Bot at 14:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors leave at message here.
Hi there, I was wondering if you have had the chance to review the FAC article as per your comment on the talk page. Don't mean to rush you or anything but it's been filibustering for a while now with few editorial reviews and I would like to see a conclusion or some more editing advice. Thanks. Rafablu88 ( talk) 18:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I see that you speedily kept Karen Gillan on the grounds of WP:SNOW using a non-admin closure. I am uncertain whether this was an appropriate application of non-admin closure. WP:NAC explicitly says that WP:SNOW should not be used for non-admin closures, and generally favours leaving discussions open for at least 5 days, whereas you closed this AfD down in a mere 23 minutes. I think you were probably right in that this article was never going to get deleted, but I thought it might be useful to discuss the approach taken in this case. Bondegezou ( talk) 10:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello Sceptre, just so you know, I've removed your IP Block Exemption as it appears that the block that was originally affecting you when I placed it has expired. If you are having any further difficulty editing, please let us know. Thanks! Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 16:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm suggesting we ask for mediation to help build teh guidance at Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). What I propose is that a mediator be the only person to edit the project page itself and be the one to guide discussion and discern consensus. I've proposed it at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Mediation. As a past participant in the lengthy debates, I'd appreciate your input and hopefully your agreement. Hiding T 10:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know I've begun GA reviews on both Matt Smith (actor) and Planet of the Dead. Cheers! Vicenarian ( T · C) 20:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
The
Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 26 - May 2009 | |
|
|
SoxBot ( talk) 10:54, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Royal broil 15:50, 6 June 2009 (UTC)It's possible, which is why I chose not to warn the user or anything of the like. Andrea ( talk) 21:57, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
You're going to have to explain how those aren't peacock terms before just removing them and claiming they aren't. They clearly are. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_peacock_terms —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rustydangerfield ( talk • contribs) 20:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter (last week) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The WikiCup Newsletter (this week) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.
I have noticed you have previously shown interest in the naming of the Macedonia-related articles. I want to inform you about the opening of Wikipedia:Centralized_discussion/Macedonia discussion. I'd like to ask you if you will be interested to add your proposals found in Talk:Macedonia#My_two_cents in the discussion pages or contribute in other ways with your input there? Thank you. Shadowmorph ^"^ 17:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to bother you but the FAC people are being really anal and want supporting users to additionally state whether they believe the sources to be reliable because Ealdgyth left them to the editors' discretion (no idea why especially as I fulfilled his criteria). Could you pop back and add your thoughts about them to your support? Thanks. Rafablu88 ( talk) 15:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Chuck Norris Messiah Juice ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. gordonrox24 ( talk) 19:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I just made then reverted the following comment at AN/I. I'm posting it here because this is mostly a suggestion for you...
Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 09:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above.
Non-compliance to the above are grounds for blocking for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling.
The probation on articles relating to Barack Obama will be reviewed by a group of involved and non-involved editors and administrators to see how effective it has been. The process will last two weeks. After the two weeks elapse, the working group will provide their findings to us and the community, and will outline how the article probation will run in the future.
- For the Arbitration Committee, Mailer Diablo 15:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by The Helpful Bot at 22:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.
Talk:List_of_Wii_games#Merge_proposal. Please partake in the merge proposal. Thegreyanomaly ( talk) 01:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
We're holding a preferential vote to decide what proposals should go forward to the community and narrow down the vast selection that we currently have. Since you've commented at the above discussion, I thought you would appreciate the opportunity to participate Fritzpoll ( talk) 08:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Since you have in the past taken part in related discussions, this comes as a notification that the Centralized discussion page set up to decide on a comprehensive naming convention about Macedonia-related naming practices is now inviting comments on a number of competing proposals from the community. Please register your opinions on the RfC subpages 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Shadowmorph ^"^ 21:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't consider precedence an argument on WP. To what extend does WP consider precedence an argument? Thanks. - Pecoc ( talk) 17:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered for the WikiCup by ROBOTIC GARDEN at 21:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.
The
Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 27 - June 2009 | |
|
|
SoxBot ( talk) 22:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered by – Juliancolton | Talk 16:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC).
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I have conducted a GA reassessment of this article and have found a few minor referencing concerns which may be viewed at Talk:Flying the Flag (for You)/GA1. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 23:03, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
I see you didn't have an easy life on WP either during the time I was gone. No, I don't think that was the problem, since there are dozens of editors at least as "invested in [their] political views" still pretty active in EE topics (and probably in other topics). The problem was my big mouth and the fact I called a spade a spade a bit to often for WP admin's taste. I also hoped WP had changed, but in the short time since I've been back I've already seen gross assumptions of bad faith, tendentious commentaries about fellow editors and even editors opposing a suggestion just because it came from me. WP is still too myspace-like, were sentiments between editors are more important that the content itself (I a short incursion in a topic that isn't part of my main editing interests I've seen otherwise correct editors supporting articles that go against all the "what Wikipedia is not" for reasons that had little to do with the actual content), so that even the most neutral editors have to chose a "side" to continue their productive editing. I think we'll just have to wait until en.WP becomes mainstream in EE. Anonimu ( talk) 11:57, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey there. If you have the time, could you have a look at my new FAC Silent Alarm like you did for Fantasy Black Channel and if possible give a verdict? It's been there for a while now and we're trying to get a consensus or obtain further advice. Thanks. Rafablu88 20:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Cool, thanks for that. And we may or may not end up with things like "X (Skins series 3 episode)" after series 4. I'll try and dig up some references for Cassie and get back to you later! :) — 97198 ( talk) 04:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)