Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Ahem *cough* wrong lyrics *cough* :P Seraphim♥ Whipp 15:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Template:Fakecn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Chirps• Clams• Chowder) 19:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
... some mƒ from ED needs some fresh air? — $PЯINGεrαgђ 01:35 18 July, 2008 (UTC)
Oh nice—I didn't even realise it was Grawp. We'll just wait for him to settle down like WoW did. ;) — $PЯINGεrαgђ 01:38 18 July, 2008 (UTC)
Don't you think you should take one step further and delete external links section of this article. Wiki isn't a directory of extremist websites after all. Cheers. M0RD00R ( talk) 15:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
As the articles created from WP:AfC are not written by you, you must explicitly credit the actual author in the edit summary, otherwise you break the GFDL.
I've fixed some of your recent AfC article submissions so that they're GFDL compliant (I'll do a few more). I've used a tweaked version of the edit summary AfC suggests; I'll leave the rest to you!
*Whack* :). Seraphim♥ Whipp 16:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Could you clarify what you are trying to convey here? Rudget ( logs) 16:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Sceptre, cummon buddy. There's no way WP can help with issues on WR. I've resolved the thread. Move on .... please. Pedro : Chat 22:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Could you please guide me in the
secret art of the floating smiley? (lower right corner)
Cheers,
Jaakobou
Chalk Talk 23:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC) clarify 23:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Further to the Fleur Beale AfD, I have noted there that being unsourced is not a reason for deletion and in this case the article was sourced but not with inline citations. I have converted the references and footnotes to inline citations. Many "unsourced" articles contain implicit references in a variety of formats and I have occasional bouts of makng those explicit. Please consider adding this to the many useful cleanup tasks that you do. — Theo (Talk) 06:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough - I didn't actually edit in that article, as far back as I can recall. Stubbing is probably for the best, though I honestly cannot see how the usual crowd of Rom-bashers can be kept away from the page without more drastic measures. And, yes, the "references" provided were mostly unilateral and taken out of context (an article about a whole people written as a synthesis of some journalists' opinions is just wrong). Cheers, Dahn ( talk) 09:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I tend to agree with blanking of this article, it was obviously crapish. But... no matter how bad it was it was way better than extremist version with all that "Jewish lies" crap, that stayed in the main space for weeks. So where do we go from here from now on?. Attempts to make it PR article, from the members of this organization, will never stop. We've seen one today, I'm sure we'll see more of those soon. Criticism from US Dept. of State, European Commission, etc etc is notable enough to be included - anti-Semitic and xenophobic nature of this org is reliably sourced, and this topic can not be avoided in sake of "neutrality". Proponents of this group so far presented no reliable source, no academic article, no nothing in favour of this group, because there is no such thing. This is what I guess makes them mad. The more uninvolved editors like you will contribute to this article, the better. And I mean real contributing, like taking part in discussion on talk page, adding refernces etc, and not simple reverting without making any input into discussion. Cheers. M0RD00R ( talk) 12:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Sarah 00:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
lol :) I do agree about "feminist" and I don't think of myself as a feminist - I just believe everyone should be treated the same regardless of sex, race, religion, etc. And that's especially so on the internet where you can't even be sure if people are women or not! I mean, look at Tony Sidaway editing as "Jenny". I'm not sure about arbitration but I strongly believe he should be desysopped one way or the other. I just don't see how you can have an admin of a top ten website openly making such bigoted and offensive comments about 50% of the population. It's a news headline waiting to happen! It might be worth waiting and seeing if more people comment - I'm hoping some guys might comment as it seems like he will only listen to men. :/ Sarah 02:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Why did you remove the AfD tag from an article under active discussion at AfD, without a clear summary, and with the edit marked as as minor? [1] ·:· Will Beback ·:· 03:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
For your efforts on behalf of Wikipedia, helping to protect WP from harmful elements. KillerChihuahua ?!? 21:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC) |
People just assume that if one person asks a question about someone else's question, it's 'cause the first person is ready to argue for some reason. But no :-) I was just really intrigued by your question. Why would it matter what media file one had listened to, and how would one contribute to the encyclopedia about it? Thanks Ling. Nut (WP:3IAR) 04:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my RFA, which passed with 140 supporting, 11 opposing, and 4 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have given to me. If I can ever assist you with anything, just ask.
Cheers!
J.delanoy gabs adds 19:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank-you for your support of me at my recent RFA, which was successful. I have appreciated everyone's comments and encouragement there. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |
I've deleted the RfC you filed against yourself as trolling. We don't need to waste everyone's time because of a misguided comment from Bedford. If you have problems that he was referring to you as an admin, ask him to change his words, or make a statement at RfArb. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
Thanks for blocking the IP (87.115.8.232) that has been annoying me. Bearian ( talk) 21:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC) |
The
Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 16 - July 2008 | |
|
Arbocalaviv, Samushi101, Carbonrodney, Red157, and dmodlin71 joined the alternative music fold during July.
|
SoxBot II ( talk) 03:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, you appear to have listed yourself as a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision. A discussion is currently ongoing on the talk page on reform of this projects goals and organisation. Proposals have been made on the future covering and scope of WikiProjects relating to the Eurovision Dance Contest, Eurovision Song Contest, and the Junior Eurovision Song Contest. These proposals include possibly re-naming WikiProject Eurovision to WikiProject Eurovision Song Contest and starting a new project called WikiProject Eurovision Dance Contest. As a member of this project, you may wish to give your input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision. Thank you. Camaron | Chris (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Please do not keep removing the discourangement of the cool down blocks provision from the blockig policy until and unless a consensus for such a change is established. I have left a message at Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy explaining my objections. You are welcome to discuss your view there. Thank you, Nsk92 ( talk) 12:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your recent anti-vandalism efforts «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC) |
I remember you as one of the few good editors on Wikipedia and seemed to be able to get things done.
Could you take a look at the article Rastafari movement? It might make you chuckle. It's really that horrible, filled with a variety of fringe theories: cannabis is derived from the Hebrew qaneh bosom, the claim that there were ancient Hindu mystics who smoked weed and had dreadlocks, the claim that ancient Israelites had dreadlocks, and there's a variety of incoherently interpreted Biblical passages. The whole thing is just crap. Complete and total crap.
Anyway, there's someone guarding the article right now who is being a bit ridiculous. Take a look at this. [3] I removed that sentence because it was absurd and he restores it with a Google search for "rasta way of life" as a citation! Hahaha!
Also, see the talkpage. ☯ Zenwhat ( talk) 19:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Félix Houphouët-Boigny needs to be copyedited and peer reviewed. We would appreciate any and all help from the crack members of the FA-Team! Sign up here. Merci! Awadewit ( talk) 12:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
You sited that I did an act vandalism to the Smack Noir page that I was editing. As the creator of the Smack Noir page, I do not understand what my infraction was. I cannot view the page to see what my error was or to correct it. Please explain what was done that constitutes vandalsim under Wikipedia's guidelines. RunnerX13 23:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
This is pointy and ridiculous. If you're so emotionally involved here that you can't be reasonable, just log off and do something else for a while. Friday (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Please review the extensive discussion at Talk:John Edwards. The material you removed was supported by a strong consensus. Ronnotel ( talk) 17:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you...
...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazi moff 22:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC) |
Will, I've always felt we've enjoyed positive communications and interactions. Your crusade regarding the civility policy ( most recent example) is becoming more disruptive than the actions of others you accuse of disruption. I'm saddened that you can't see that you're simply fanning flames, striring pots and creating drama. I'd suggest you pause, take a breath, and consider wether your actions in this regard are actually helping Wikipedia. Pedro : Chat 12:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've reverted your blankings of List of fascist movements by country A-F and associated articles. The articles have survived the AfD for which you nominated them. If you disagree with the outcome, please refer to this guide. Thanks, -- Stlemur ( talk) 18:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, I've gotten about halfway through cleaning this one up. If you would like to pitch in and check the remaining ones that I did not leave a <!--comment--> by you may do so. —— nix eagle 20:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Seriously? Why do RfAs get used as opinion platforms? Could you imagine if someone did that to you? I'm really disappointed. Seraphim♥ Whipp 22:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
You could have more success with suggesting moves rather than deletions.-- Kozuch ( talk) 14:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
In the sequence of reverts you made to [4] you abused the rollback function to revert non-vandal edits. I have removed your rollback capability for a period of 30 days as a result. Please re-apply at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions or ask an administrator in 30 days to have it re-granted. MBisanz talk 14:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Will, I'm sure you know that what you're doing is pointy and disruptive; the WP:CIVIL thing the other day, now this mass-tagging of any and all "Criticism of ..." articles. Deliberately doing things to get a reaction is trolling, and I can't think of any more apposite term for what you've been doing. I don't know if you'll listen to me or not, but please consider not trolling any more, or you risk being blocked. Neıl ☄ 15:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Sceptre, please do not leave any more messages on Bedford's talk page that will be read as taunting him. Provoking him further is not going to help the project in any way that I can see. And civility is expected of everyone. Jonathunder ( talk) 17:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Will - given the events of the last few days, and the various problems you have encountered, perhaps you should consider taking a true break. If you're unable to tear yourself away, even though you are clearly unhappy with Wikipedia, there is always Wikibreak Enforcer. Avruch T 21:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
SingWale (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Here's some curry for you, since I know you like it. :) — $PЯINGεrαgђ 00:09 7 August, 2008 (UTC)
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Ahem *cough* wrong lyrics *cough* :P Seraphim♥ Whipp 15:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Template:Fakecn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Chirps• Clams• Chowder) 19:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
... some mƒ from ED needs some fresh air? — $PЯINGεrαgђ 01:35 18 July, 2008 (UTC)
Oh nice—I didn't even realise it was Grawp. We'll just wait for him to settle down like WoW did. ;) — $PЯINGεrαgђ 01:38 18 July, 2008 (UTC)
Don't you think you should take one step further and delete external links section of this article. Wiki isn't a directory of extremist websites after all. Cheers. M0RD00R ( talk) 15:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
As the articles created from WP:AfC are not written by you, you must explicitly credit the actual author in the edit summary, otherwise you break the GFDL.
I've fixed some of your recent AfC article submissions so that they're GFDL compliant (I'll do a few more). I've used a tweaked version of the edit summary AfC suggests; I'll leave the rest to you!
*Whack* :). Seraphim♥ Whipp 16:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Could you clarify what you are trying to convey here? Rudget ( logs) 16:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Sceptre, cummon buddy. There's no way WP can help with issues on WR. I've resolved the thread. Move on .... please. Pedro : Chat 22:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Could you please guide me in the
secret art of the floating smiley? (lower right corner)
Cheers,
Jaakobou
Chalk Talk 23:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC) clarify 23:06, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Further to the Fleur Beale AfD, I have noted there that being unsourced is not a reason for deletion and in this case the article was sourced but not with inline citations. I have converted the references and footnotes to inline citations. Many "unsourced" articles contain implicit references in a variety of formats and I have occasional bouts of makng those explicit. Please consider adding this to the many useful cleanup tasks that you do. — Theo (Talk) 06:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Fair enough - I didn't actually edit in that article, as far back as I can recall. Stubbing is probably for the best, though I honestly cannot see how the usual crowd of Rom-bashers can be kept away from the page without more drastic measures. And, yes, the "references" provided were mostly unilateral and taken out of context (an article about a whole people written as a synthesis of some journalists' opinions is just wrong). Cheers, Dahn ( talk) 09:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I tend to agree with blanking of this article, it was obviously crapish. But... no matter how bad it was it was way better than extremist version with all that "Jewish lies" crap, that stayed in the main space for weeks. So where do we go from here from now on?. Attempts to make it PR article, from the members of this organization, will never stop. We've seen one today, I'm sure we'll see more of those soon. Criticism from US Dept. of State, European Commission, etc etc is notable enough to be included - anti-Semitic and xenophobic nature of this org is reliably sourced, and this topic can not be avoided in sake of "neutrality". Proponents of this group so far presented no reliable source, no academic article, no nothing in favour of this group, because there is no such thing. This is what I guess makes them mad. The more uninvolved editors like you will contribute to this article, the better. And I mean real contributing, like taking part in discussion on talk page, adding refernces etc, and not simple reverting without making any input into discussion. Cheers. M0RD00R ( talk) 12:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. Sarah 00:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
lol :) I do agree about "feminist" and I don't think of myself as a feminist - I just believe everyone should be treated the same regardless of sex, race, religion, etc. And that's especially so on the internet where you can't even be sure if people are women or not! I mean, look at Tony Sidaway editing as "Jenny". I'm not sure about arbitration but I strongly believe he should be desysopped one way or the other. I just don't see how you can have an admin of a top ten website openly making such bigoted and offensive comments about 50% of the population. It's a news headline waiting to happen! It might be worth waiting and seeing if more people comment - I'm hoping some guys might comment as it seems like he will only listen to men. :/ Sarah 02:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Why did you remove the AfD tag from an article under active discussion at AfD, without a clear summary, and with the edit marked as as minor? [1] ·:· Will Beback ·:· 03:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar | ||
For your efforts on behalf of Wikipedia, helping to protect WP from harmful elements. KillerChihuahua ?!? 21:46, 26 July 2008 (UTC) |
People just assume that if one person asks a question about someone else's question, it's 'cause the first person is ready to argue for some reason. But no :-) I was just really intrigued by your question. Why would it matter what media file one had listened to, and how would one contribute to the encyclopedia about it? Thanks Ling. Nut (WP:3IAR) 04:39, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support in my RFA, which passed with 140 supporting, 11 opposing, and 4 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have given to me. If I can ever assist you with anything, just ask.
Cheers!
J.delanoy gabs adds 19:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank-you for your support of me at my recent RFA, which was successful. I have appreciated everyone's comments and encouragement there. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |
I've deleted the RfC you filed against yourself as trolling. We don't need to waste everyone's time because of a misguided comment from Bedford. If you have problems that he was referring to you as an admin, ask him to change his words, or make a statement at RfArb. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
Thanks for blocking the IP (87.115.8.232) that has been annoying me. Bearian ( talk) 21:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC) |
The
Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 16 - July 2008 | |
|
Arbocalaviv, Samushi101, Carbonrodney, Red157, and dmodlin71 joined the alternative music fold during July.
|
SoxBot II ( talk) 03:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, you appear to have listed yourself as a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision. A discussion is currently ongoing on the talk page on reform of this projects goals and organisation. Proposals have been made on the future covering and scope of WikiProjects relating to the Eurovision Dance Contest, Eurovision Song Contest, and the Junior Eurovision Song Contest. These proposals include possibly re-naming WikiProject Eurovision to WikiProject Eurovision Song Contest and starting a new project called WikiProject Eurovision Dance Contest. As a member of this project, you may wish to give your input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision. Thank you. Camaron | Chris (talk) 08:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Please do not keep removing the discourangement of the cool down blocks provision from the blockig policy until and unless a consensus for such a change is established. I have left a message at Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy explaining my objections. You are welcome to discuss your view there. Thank you, Nsk92 ( talk) 12:26, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your recent anti-vandalism efforts «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC) |
I remember you as one of the few good editors on Wikipedia and seemed to be able to get things done.
Could you take a look at the article Rastafari movement? It might make you chuckle. It's really that horrible, filled with a variety of fringe theories: cannabis is derived from the Hebrew qaneh bosom, the claim that there were ancient Hindu mystics who smoked weed and had dreadlocks, the claim that ancient Israelites had dreadlocks, and there's a variety of incoherently interpreted Biblical passages. The whole thing is just crap. Complete and total crap.
Anyway, there's someone guarding the article right now who is being a bit ridiculous. Take a look at this. [3] I removed that sentence because it was absurd and he restores it with a Google search for "rasta way of life" as a citation! Hahaha!
Also, see the talkpage. ☯ Zenwhat ( talk) 19:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Félix Houphouët-Boigny needs to be copyedited and peer reviewed. We would appreciate any and all help from the crack members of the FA-Team! Sign up here. Merci! Awadewit ( talk) 12:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
You sited that I did an act vandalism to the Smack Noir page that I was editing. As the creator of the Smack Noir page, I do not understand what my infraction was. I cannot view the page to see what my error was or to correct it. Please explain what was done that constitutes vandalsim under Wikipedia's guidelines. RunnerX13 23:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
This is pointy and ridiculous. If you're so emotionally involved here that you can't be reasonable, just log off and do something else for a while. Friday (talk) 14:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Please review the extensive discussion at Talk:John Edwards. The material you removed was supported by a strong consensus. Ronnotel ( talk) 17:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you...
...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazi moff 22:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC) |
Will, I've always felt we've enjoyed positive communications and interactions. Your crusade regarding the civility policy ( most recent example) is becoming more disruptive than the actions of others you accuse of disruption. I'm saddened that you can't see that you're simply fanning flames, striring pots and creating drama. I'd suggest you pause, take a breath, and consider wether your actions in this regard are actually helping Wikipedia. Pedro : Chat 12:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I've reverted your blankings of List of fascist movements by country A-F and associated articles. The articles have survived the AfD for which you nominated them. If you disagree with the outcome, please refer to this guide. Thanks, -- Stlemur ( talk) 18:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, I've gotten about halfway through cleaning this one up. If you would like to pitch in and check the remaining ones that I did not leave a <!--comment--> by you may do so. —— nix eagle 20:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Seriously? Why do RfAs get used as opinion platforms? Could you imagine if someone did that to you? I'm really disappointed. Seraphim♥ Whipp 22:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
You could have more success with suggesting moves rather than deletions.-- Kozuch ( talk) 14:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
In the sequence of reverts you made to [4] you abused the rollback function to revert non-vandal edits. I have removed your rollback capability for a period of 30 days as a result. Please re-apply at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions or ask an administrator in 30 days to have it re-granted. MBisanz talk 14:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Will, I'm sure you know that what you're doing is pointy and disruptive; the WP:CIVIL thing the other day, now this mass-tagging of any and all "Criticism of ..." articles. Deliberately doing things to get a reaction is trolling, and I can't think of any more apposite term for what you've been doing. I don't know if you'll listen to me or not, but please consider not trolling any more, or you risk being blocked. Neıl ☄ 15:07, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Sceptre, please do not leave any more messages on Bedford's talk page that will be read as taunting him. Provoking him further is not going to help the project in any way that I can see. And civility is expected of everyone. Jonathunder ( talk) 17:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Will - given the events of the last few days, and the various problems you have encountered, perhaps you should consider taking a true break. If you're unable to tear yourself away, even though you are clearly unhappy with Wikipedia, there is always Wikibreak Enforcer. Avruch T 21:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
SingWale (
talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Here's some curry for you, since I know you like it. :) — $PЯINGεrαgђ 00:09 7 August, 2008 (UTC)