Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Hi, the deletion review closed with "Non delete closure endorsed. The discussion below doesn't show a clear consensus for or against the merge, but that can be hashed out editorially" which I would think means that a merger should be discussed before doing so. That's why I removed the redirect. Thoughts? Hobit ( talk) 01:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to butt in, but I can't find a deletion review, or any indication that there was one. (Had I known, I would have contributed.) Can you just point me to it so I can read it? Thanks! -- Karen | Talk | contribs 03:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello! Just FYI, I've been working with the author to fix the article. S/he is brand new to WP, so go easy on him/her! Cheers!-- Sallicio 04:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Just curious at the several screen cap images that are being deleted per your request? Is there a reason to G7 them? Thanks! -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 05:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Daleks in Manhattan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Hiya; just to let you know, take a peep at my new thread at WT:WHO... — TreasuryTag— t— c 13:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I should have merged them myself, it's much appreciated George The Dragon ( talk) 23:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
I've archived the AN thread for trolling. I just wish I could do something more about it, but people hate me for not being cheery enough... create another thread about him if he continues. Sceptre ( talk) 20:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
The user in question has 364 edits and has been editing since November 9. Blocking the user for a user name policy, imo, would not serve to help the 'pedia. If someone feels that the user name should be changed, then I think going and asking the user would be better than blocking him/her. I hope this explains my opinion. Cheers. « Gonzo fan2007 ( talk ♦ contribs) 03:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you did this. I was the one that changed the title to Screw/Bolt because the article is about screws and bolts and not the other uses of the term screw. It might have started as a general article about all the various meanings of screw but it is not that now. There are several other articles that deal with the term screw in a more general sense. Your comment made it seem like you preferred Screw/bolt because of capitalization. Is that correct? Perhaps you would have preferred Screws and Bolts as the title to the article?
Davefoc ( talk) 07:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Sceptre...Thank you for agreeing to be part of the Assessment Committee of WikiProject Doctor Who. Please stop by the talk page to discuss how the articles will be assessed. To denote your participation in this committee on the main project page, you can use the following image next to your user name. Image:Gnome-searchtool blue.svg
Thank you for taking the time to assess these articles. - LA @ 22:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, do you think I could ask what this was about? — TreasuryTag— t— c 15:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I just received your note about reverting the edits I made to this page. In fact I did use the edit summary box, and would like to ask that you undo your revision as I do feel it was constructive from a critical and scholarly point of view. The content goes DIRECTLY to territorial integrity, and furthermore it was an official and public statement by a government official relating a critical an crucial aspect of the history of the region, providing the essence for understanding the depth of the difficulty, and which is historically verifyable and correct. Thanks for the input, but I kindly ask you revert your edit to the addition I made. Please respond. Regards, 207.112.23.122 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I am new here and don't know if I am even talking to you correctly, so forgive me if I am wrong.
I believe my switchfoot page edit was constructive. I filled in the edit summary to try to explain that. I own and run the website www.Learning2Breathe.com, which is where the lyrics and song-stories are linked up to (on the main Switchfoot page, and other related pages). I would simply like others to know that there is more to my website than just the lyrics. I thought my edit was a solution. Please let me know if I am violating some rule with this. -- Concretegirl2 ( talk) 04:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the information, I wasn't aware of that. However, I did not choose to put my lyrics and song-stories on the page in the first place. I am happy to be of help, just thought I would direct others to the rest of my site in the process.
On a similar note, I was wondering why there are NO fansites in the External Links. Is it possible to add a sub-category in the External Links for fansites? I know of a couple that update regularly and are nice quality. -- Concretegirl2 ( talk) 04:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand why you instant on characterizing the CBC protests as "minimal" when more than 10000 people have signed an online protest. There is a live protest happening in Vancouver. If you insist on "minimal", provide your source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.184.185 ( talk) 05:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Not meaning to sound nosy or anything, but I take it that this is an April Fools joke? Fusion Mix 22:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Semi-serious? Delete rickroll? I'll have no part in that. :P Also, I could've sworn The Game was passed through AFD as a delete consensus... humph. Oh, and instead of having the image I made you be tiny, how about I make it into a banner? The disadvantage is it wouldn't necessarily always be the width of the page (as different viewers have different resolutions), but you could probably center it or something... Anyway, I could just crop out a wider, shorter piece. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 02:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I was also wondering the same thing. Was this AfD supposed to be serious? If so, I'll move it back to its proper location. -- Ixfd64 ( talk) 06:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Mate, I just rickrolled your AfD. :D dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 11:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
There is a reason for nominating articles for deletion. When you nominated the article for deletion, you did not point out any reason. Articles have a reason to be deleted. If you have reason for the nomination, explain it. Mythdon ( talk) 10:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
There is a new discussion regarding the cabals which were brought up at MfD last week. I've started an informal consensus survey which I hope will help us come to a conclusion on whether the cabals should remain deleted. You can express your opinion at this page (link). Thank you. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 12:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
Aprils fools day was a blast. Loads of users lightened up to have good old fashion fun. I want to thank you for taking part in editing this page in particular and even though I may not know you, embrace the same talk pages, or even edit with you in the near future, I'd like to award you this Barnstar for making Wikipedia a fun environment in which to contribute. Until next year. :) SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 13:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
Here's a
Sakotis for you! This cake promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving this cake to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing!
Fernando Buceta (
talk) 10:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
Thanks so much for helping me out with my template. You saved the day. нмŵוτн τ 19:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
The
Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 12 - March 2008 | |
|
NewMarqueeDayMoonRising, Thundermaster, and SuperNeek joined the alternative music fold during March.
|
If you missed last the previous newsletter, you can find it at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music/Newsletter/February 2008.
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for
WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section
here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated
Giggabot (
talk) 09:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
See [1] - not vandalism by WierdEars at all, though he did add the title badly! Stephenb (Talk) 18:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The Space-Time Telegraph | ||||||
The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter | ||||||
Issue 1 | March 2008 | |||||
For the Doctor Who project,
Sceptre (
talk) 19:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
Sceptre, thanks for doing this. I haven't been very active in the project lately, and it's great to have this to keep up-to-date with developments. (I assume you're the one behind this, since you signed the newsletter delivery?) Anyway, it's a great idea. — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 19:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thanks very much for sending me the Dr. Who newsletter. i really appreciate it. however, one small note; my user name happens to be Sm8900, not SM9800. Just wanted to mention that. it's not really a big deal though. thanks very much for all your work and efforts. thanks. see you. -- Steve, Sm8900 ( talk) 22:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Tim! has redirected the article to the List of Doctor Who serials, calling it "redundant". Just thought I'd mention it. — Edokter • Talk • 10:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Will, thanks for the welcome back. I hear that you're under the weather. I hope you feel better soon. -- Kyok o 16:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Well done. A much improved summary of tonight's episode. -- Brian R Hunter ( talk) 23:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Star_Wars#GA_review all done Gary King ( talk) 04:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Whats "NTWW nom" mean? Google says "NOT THE WEST WING". Is it my nom of him, or some nom of his on an article? MBisanz talk 06:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Your change to remove speculation over the 1/2 dalek on the Series Four page was correct. The justification should have been POV speculation. Davros clearly fits the description. He was of course a Kaled that evolved into The Emperor. This supposed fact of his return should not appear in wikipedia until a reliable source can be quoted. -- Brian R Hunter ( talk) 18:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
— $PЯINGεrαgђ 03:54 8 April, 2008 (UTC)
Please remember that rollback should only be used to revert obvious vandalism. Using it to revert edits that are the subject of a content dispute, like this revert, isn't appropriate. Thanks! Stifle ( talk) 11:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Have you ever being involved in Doctor Who episodes? The only way to get the point across is to R(B)I anyone who puts in these inane rumours, as it gets beyond a joke. Hell, I've violated 3RR many times on List of Doctor Who serials ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) just to keep it at featured list quality (I don't know how the hell I hoodwinked everyone into getting it promoted). Sceptre ( talk) 11:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Best take this up with you instead of the mostly unwatched Template talk:FreeContentMeta - there's really no reason for the boxes to be that shade of green. It's immediately eye-grabbing against the faint blues, greys, and whites of normal backgrounds. I know the need to disambiguate sister projects and free wikis, but this is the wrong way to do it: we should be advertising our wikis first. I've edited the DW wikia box as a bold test to make it look different but not too different: see Template:TardisIndexFile. Thanks, Sceptre ( talk) 18:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
You were involved in this discussion, so I thought you might be interested in Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#Criterion 8 objection. howcheng { chat} 21:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Again, we'll have to get in touch with Guinness, but kudos to you! — 97198 talk 06:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Nishidani has a history of disrupting conversation with
19,000 char off topic comments that usually use anti-Zionist sources and anti-Israel soapbox to boot (sometimes accompanied by
bigoted comments also). Since he is not a party to discussions and his commentary was completely off topic, I believe it would be best to remove this offtopic commentary. To clarify, non relevant information is a
common disruption. Regardless, I consider you to have final descision on this subject, now that I've clarified it.
With respect,
Jaakobou
Chalk Talk 12:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Good substantive close but bad technical ;-). You need to add {{ subst:mfd bottom}} to the bottom of the discussion page, the purple background now goes all the way to the bottom of the MfD page! Also, you really should put "(non-admin closing)" right before your signature. Also, don't forget to remove the MfD tag and place an old mfd tag on the talk page. I'll give you a few minutes to fix them and if I don't see anything I'll take care of it. Cheers.-- Doug.( talk • contribs) 14:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
— Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Hi, the deletion review closed with "Non delete closure endorsed. The discussion below doesn't show a clear consensus for or against the merge, but that can be hashed out editorially" which I would think means that a merger should be discussed before doing so. That's why I removed the redirect. Thoughts? Hobit ( talk) 01:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, sorry to butt in, but I can't find a deletion review, or any indication that there was one. (Had I known, I would have contributed.) Can you just point me to it so I can read it? Thanks! -- Karen | Talk | contribs 03:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello! Just FYI, I've been working with the author to fix the article. S/he is brand new to WP, so go easy on him/her! Cheers!-- Sallicio 04:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Just curious at the several screen cap images that are being deleted per your request? Is there a reason to G7 them? Thanks! -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 05:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Daleks in Manhattan.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Hiya; just to let you know, take a peep at my new thread at WT:WHO... — TreasuryTag— t— c 13:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I should have merged them myself, it's much appreciated George The Dragon ( talk) 23:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
I've archived the AN thread for trolling. I just wish I could do something more about it, but people hate me for not being cheery enough... create another thread about him if he continues. Sceptre ( talk) 20:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
The user in question has 364 edits and has been editing since November 9. Blocking the user for a user name policy, imo, would not serve to help the 'pedia. If someone feels that the user name should be changed, then I think going and asking the user would be better than blocking him/her. I hope this explains my opinion. Cheers. « Gonzo fan2007 ( talk ♦ contribs) 03:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you did this. I was the one that changed the title to Screw/Bolt because the article is about screws and bolts and not the other uses of the term screw. It might have started as a general article about all the various meanings of screw but it is not that now. There are several other articles that deal with the term screw in a more general sense. Your comment made it seem like you preferred Screw/bolt because of capitalization. Is that correct? Perhaps you would have preferred Screws and Bolts as the title to the article?
Davefoc ( talk) 07:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Sceptre...Thank you for agreeing to be part of the Assessment Committee of WikiProject Doctor Who. Please stop by the talk page to discuss how the articles will be assessed. To denote your participation in this committee on the main project page, you can use the following image next to your user name. Image:Gnome-searchtool blue.svg
Thank you for taking the time to assess these articles. - LA @ 22:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, do you think I could ask what this was about? — TreasuryTag— t— c 15:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I just received your note about reverting the edits I made to this page. In fact I did use the edit summary box, and would like to ask that you undo your revision as I do feel it was constructive from a critical and scholarly point of view. The content goes DIRECTLY to territorial integrity, and furthermore it was an official and public statement by a government official relating a critical an crucial aspect of the history of the region, providing the essence for understanding the depth of the difficulty, and which is historically verifyable and correct. Thanks for the input, but I kindly ask you revert your edit to the addition I made. Please respond. Regards, 207.112.23.122 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I am new here and don't know if I am even talking to you correctly, so forgive me if I am wrong.
I believe my switchfoot page edit was constructive. I filled in the edit summary to try to explain that. I own and run the website www.Learning2Breathe.com, which is where the lyrics and song-stories are linked up to (on the main Switchfoot page, and other related pages). I would simply like others to know that there is more to my website than just the lyrics. I thought my edit was a solution. Please let me know if I am violating some rule with this. -- Concretegirl2 ( talk) 04:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the information, I wasn't aware of that. However, I did not choose to put my lyrics and song-stories on the page in the first place. I am happy to be of help, just thought I would direct others to the rest of my site in the process.
On a similar note, I was wondering why there are NO fansites in the External Links. Is it possible to add a sub-category in the External Links for fansites? I know of a couple that update regularly and are nice quality. -- Concretegirl2 ( talk) 04:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand why you instant on characterizing the CBC protests as "minimal" when more than 10000 people have signed an online protest. There is a live protest happening in Vancouver. If you insist on "minimal", provide your source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.184.185 ( talk) 05:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Not meaning to sound nosy or anything, but I take it that this is an April Fools joke? Fusion Mix 22:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Semi-serious? Delete rickroll? I'll have no part in that. :P Also, I could've sworn The Game was passed through AFD as a delete consensus... humph. Oh, and instead of having the image I made you be tiny, how about I make it into a banner? The disadvantage is it wouldn't necessarily always be the width of the page (as different viewers have different resolutions), but you could probably center it or something... Anyway, I could just crop out a wider, shorter piece. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 02:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I was also wondering the same thing. Was this AfD supposed to be serious? If so, I'll move it back to its proper location. -- Ixfd64 ( talk) 06:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Mate, I just rickrolled your AfD. :D dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 11:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
There is a reason for nominating articles for deletion. When you nominated the article for deletion, you did not point out any reason. Articles have a reason to be deleted. If you have reason for the nomination, explain it. Mythdon ( talk) 10:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
There is a new discussion regarding the cabals which were brought up at MfD last week. I've started an informal consensus survey which I hope will help us come to a conclusion on whether the cabals should remain deleted. You can express your opinion at this page (link). Thank you. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 12:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
Aprils fools day was a blast. Loads of users lightened up to have good old fashion fun. I want to thank you for taking part in editing this page in particular and even though I may not know you, embrace the same talk pages, or even edit with you in the near future, I'd like to award you this Barnstar for making Wikipedia a fun environment in which to contribute. Until next year. :) SynergeticMaggot ( talk) 13:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
Here's a
Sakotis for you! This cake promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving this cake to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing!
Fernando Buceta (
talk) 10:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
Thanks so much for helping me out with my template. You saved the day. нмŵוτн τ 19:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
The
Alternative music WikiProject Newsletter Issue 12 - March 2008 | |
|
NewMarqueeDayMoonRising, Thundermaster, and SuperNeek joined the alternative music fold during March.
|
If you missed last the previous newsletter, you can find it at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music/Newsletter/February 2008.
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for
WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section
here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated
Giggabot (
talk) 09:51, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
See [1] - not vandalism by WierdEars at all, though he did add the title badly! Stephenb (Talk) 18:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
The Space-Time Telegraph | ||||||
The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter | ||||||
Issue 1 | March 2008 | |||||
For the Doctor Who project,
Sceptre (
talk) 19:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC) |
Sceptre, thanks for doing this. I haven't been very active in the project lately, and it's great to have this to keep up-to-date with developments. (I assume you're the one behind this, since you signed the newsletter delivery?) Anyway, it's a great idea. — Josiah Rowe ( talk • contribs) 19:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thanks very much for sending me the Dr. Who newsletter. i really appreciate it. however, one small note; my user name happens to be Sm8900, not SM9800. Just wanted to mention that. it's not really a big deal though. thanks very much for all your work and efforts. thanks. see you. -- Steve, Sm8900 ( talk) 22:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Tim! has redirected the article to the List of Doctor Who serials, calling it "redundant". Just thought I'd mention it. — Edokter • Talk • 10:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Will, thanks for the welcome back. I hear that you're under the weather. I hope you feel better soon. -- Kyok o 16:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Well done. A much improved summary of tonight's episode. -- Brian R Hunter ( talk) 23:03, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Star_Wars#GA_review all done Gary King ( talk) 04:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Whats "NTWW nom" mean? Google says "NOT THE WEST WING". Is it my nom of him, or some nom of his on an article? MBisanz talk 06:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Your change to remove speculation over the 1/2 dalek on the Series Four page was correct. The justification should have been POV speculation. Davros clearly fits the description. He was of course a Kaled that evolved into The Emperor. This supposed fact of his return should not appear in wikipedia until a reliable source can be quoted. -- Brian R Hunter ( talk) 18:41, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
— $PЯINGεrαgђ 03:54 8 April, 2008 (UTC)
Please remember that rollback should only be used to revert obvious vandalism. Using it to revert edits that are the subject of a content dispute, like this revert, isn't appropriate. Thanks! Stifle ( talk) 11:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Have you ever being involved in Doctor Who episodes? The only way to get the point across is to R(B)I anyone who puts in these inane rumours, as it gets beyond a joke. Hell, I've violated 3RR many times on List of Doctor Who serials ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) just to keep it at featured list quality (I don't know how the hell I hoodwinked everyone into getting it promoted). Sceptre ( talk) 11:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Best take this up with you instead of the mostly unwatched Template talk:FreeContentMeta - there's really no reason for the boxes to be that shade of green. It's immediately eye-grabbing against the faint blues, greys, and whites of normal backgrounds. I know the need to disambiguate sister projects and free wikis, but this is the wrong way to do it: we should be advertising our wikis first. I've edited the DW wikia box as a bold test to make it look different but not too different: see Template:TardisIndexFile. Thanks, Sceptre ( talk) 18:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
You were involved in this discussion, so I thought you might be interested in Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#Criterion 8 objection. howcheng { chat} 21:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Again, we'll have to get in touch with Guinness, but kudos to you! — 97198 talk 06:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Nishidani has a history of disrupting conversation with
19,000 char off topic comments that usually use anti-Zionist sources and anti-Israel soapbox to boot (sometimes accompanied by
bigoted comments also). Since he is not a party to discussions and his commentary was completely off topic, I believe it would be best to remove this offtopic commentary. To clarify, non relevant information is a
common disruption. Regardless, I consider you to have final descision on this subject, now that I've clarified it.
With respect,
Jaakobou
Chalk Talk 12:26, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Good substantive close but bad technical ;-). You need to add {{ subst:mfd bottom}} to the bottom of the discussion page, the purple background now goes all the way to the bottom of the MfD page! Also, you really should put "(non-admin closing)" right before your signature. Also, don't forget to remove the MfD tag and place an old mfd tag on the talk page. I'll give you a few minutes to fix them and if I don't see anything I'll take care of it. Cheers.-- Doug.( talk • contribs) 14:05, 11 April 2008 (UTC)