This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
On 15 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lithuania–Poland border, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Lithuania–Poland border is the only land border that the Baltic States share with a country that is not a member of the Russian-aligned Commonwealth of Independent States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lithuania–Poland border. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 08:42, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Greetings! For this month's issue...
We have demos!
After a lengthy research and design process, we decided for WikiProject X to focus on two things:
We have a live demonstration of the new WikiProject workflow at WikiProject Women in Technology, a brand new WikiProject that was set up as an adjunct to a related edit-a-thon in Washington, DC. The goal is to surface action items for editors, and we intend on doing that through automatically updated working lists. We are looking into using SuggestBot to generate lists of outstanding tasks, and we are looking into additional options for automatic worklist generation. This takes the burden off of WikiProject editors to generate these worklists, though there is also a "requests" section for Wikipedians to make individual requests. (As of writing, these automated lists are not yet live, so you will see a blank space under "edit articles" on the demo WikiProject. Sorry about that!) I invite you to check out the WikiProject and leave feedback on WikiProject X's talk page.
Once the demo is sufficiently developed, we will be working on a limited deployment on our pilot WikiProjects. We have selected five for the first round of testing based on the highest potential for impact and will scale up from there.
While a re-designed WikiProject experience is much needed, that alone isn't enough. A WikiProject isn't any good if people have no way of discovering it. This is why we are also developing an automatically updated WikiProject directory. This directory will surface project-related metrics, including a count of active WikiProject participants and of active editors in that project's subject area. The purpose of these metrics is to highlight how active the WikiProject is at the given point of time, but also to highlight that project's potential for success. The directory is not yet live but there is a demonstration featuring a sampling of WikiProjects.
Each directory entry will link to a WikiProject description page which automatically list the active WikiProject participants and subject-area article editors. This allows Wikipedians to find each other based on the areas they are interested in, and this information can be used to revive a WikiProject, start a new one, or even for some other purpose. These description pages are not online yet, but they will use this template, if you want to get a feel of what they will look like.
We need volunteers!
WikiProject X is a huge undertaking, and we need volunteers to support our efforts, including testers and coders. Check out our volunteer portal and see what you can do to help us!
As an aside...
Wouldn't it be cool if lists of requested articles could not only be integrated directly with WikiProjects, but also shared between WikiProjects? Well, we got the crazy idea of having experimental software feature Flow deployed (on a totally experimental basis) on the new Article Request Workshop, which seeks to be a place where editors can "workshop" article ideas before they get created. It uses Flow because Flow allows, essentially, section-level categorization, and in the future will allow "sections" (known as "topics" within Flow) to be included across different pages. What this means is that you have a recommendation for a new article tagged by multiple WikiProjects, allowing for the recommendation to appear on lists for each WikiProject. This will facilitate inter-WikiProject collaboration and will help to reduce duplicated work. The Article Request Workshop is not entirely ready yet due to some bugs with Flow, but we hope to integrate it into our pilot WikiProjects at some point.
Harej ( talk) 00:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Elena Elk ( talk) 05:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Hi, Piotrus!
You proposed this article ( Alexander Telalim) for deletion because of the following concern:
"The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back..."
I'm sorry, this is my first article in the English Wikipedia, I may have missed some of the factors. The main mistake is absence links from non-English language.
At this point it is corrected. To the list of external sources added two TV shows with artists (including one devoted entirely to him) with national Bulgarian TV, two broadcast with National Bulgarian Radio, several interviews given to various publications and publishing houses in Bulgaria. If that's not enough, I can find other links.
In addition, fixed other minor bugs (internal links to other pages, etc.)
Moreover, this section requires adding a subsection "Bulgarian watercolor painters" to "Bulgarian painters." What do you think? (I plan to write a few articles about the Bulgarian watercolorist)
Thanks, Elena
(P.S. "Элена Элк" is my nickname at Russian and Bulgarian Wiki. Here I am "Elena Elk") — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elena Elk ( talk • contribs) 05:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Элена Элк (
talk) 08:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Еhe necessary changes are made and it seems that this is enough.
Thanks to all the participants in the discussion for the help
Elena Elk ( talk) 12:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Hi, Piotrus!
I agree with principle "one nick is one account", but in the rules says:
Editors who want to use more than one account for some valid reason should provide links between them on the respective user pages (see below), with an explanation of the purpose of each account or of the relationship between them.
I have the same nickname with different writing - in English (Elena Elk) and in Cyrillic (Элена Элк) because I am the editor of the English Wikipedia, and the editor of Russian and Bulgarian Wikipedia sections, where articles are writed in the Cyrillic alphabet.
As soon as we started the discussion, I immediately pointed to you my second nickname, that is, it seemed to me I act correctly.
If this is not so, I would like to understand whether can join the two accounts into one with preservation of the contributions of both and the date of occurrence of the oldest account of them? And if possible, who can do that?
Thanks you in advance, Elena Elk
Hi, This edit for gender and childhood is for an academic assignment. Our class is not listed, but it is for a Humanities class at Vanderbilt University. Our instructor is Dr. Leslie Kirby. Thanks.
Dunlapel ( talk) 05:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Palmiry massacre at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 21:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Re: Webster, Sheffield, Fleischman, Hitchcock & Chrystie
Hi you proposed this page for deletion on 7 April. I only noticed the PROD now, and the page is already deleted. I was the author of the page. Unfortunately I can't see what I wrote so that I can justify its existence.
I believe the page should continue to exist for the following reasons:
1. There is a detailed Wikipedia biography page for the law firm's founder, Bethuel M. Webster. 2. A link from Bethuel Webster's page to his law firm's page seemed helpful. 3. The former mayor of New York, John Lindsay, another prominent person with a Wikipedia biography, was also a partner of the Webster Sheffield law firm 4. It received regular coverage in the New York Times, a prominent newspaper. 5. Numerous defunct law firms are covered by Wikipedia articles, and defunct law firms of the United States is a recognized category. 6. Numerous defunct New York City establishments are covered by Wikipedia articles.
Can you please tell me what I can do to reinstate the page (beside writing it again), or appealing the PROD?
Best regards, Cbmccarthy ( talk) 19:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Piotrus As a member of the WikiProject Poland, I would like to inform you about the constant vandalism of an unregistered user in the article called Rosa Raisa. Without sources, references or bibliography the user is changing the nationality and name of the character that the article is based on. Additionally the user also deleted all the categories at the bottom relating to Poland. I simply asked if he/she could include sources that support the argument, but this did not happen. I personally do not know the answer (the argument is about the nationality of Rosa Raisa; whether she declared herself Russian-Jewish or Polish-Jewish), but the user also threatened to report me simply for asking about a source.
I really ask for your help! THANKS Oliszydlowski (TALK) 22:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Oliszydlowski is flagrantly misrepresenting what happens. I DID provide the full reference, citing the authoritative book published by the US academic press. Even after I provided the reference on his talk page (which can also be found in the Wikipedia article on Rosa Raisa'se), Oliszydlowski again refused to respect the fact about this soprano. I used my IP address because I didn't have the Wikipedia account at that time. Now I have created it to report his abuse of Rosa Raisa's page. Oliszydlowski needs to provide his documented sources for his claims. I have already provided mine on his talk page. Resorting to misleading words such as "vandalism" is unethical, especially when lying that I didn't provide any source. See Oliszydlowski's talk page and the full citation of the book about Raisa I provided earlier today. Shameful! I will report this unethical and untruthful accusation as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiuserthea ( talk • contribs) 02:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
After the administrator Ed Johnston suggested Simon Segal as an example (or similar) for someone born in Bialystok in the 1890s, you went to Segal's page to insert "Polish-Jewish" for his identity. You referenced it to a general book (not his detailed biography). Note that other general books identify him as "Russian-Jewish". For example, Maren Tova Linett, "Modernism, Feminism, and Jewishness" (Cambridge University Press 2007, pg. 8): "Simon Segal, a compassionate Russian-Jewish painter." Another example-- Lilian PizzichiniI, "The Blue Hour: A Portrait of Jean Rhys" (Bloomsbury Lives of Women, 2010): "His name was Simon Segal. He was a melancholic Russian Jew" I have not removed your edit but assume that you would do it in the light of these alternative designations of his ethnicity. Wikiuserthea ( talk) 22:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, could you restore the article about Benedykt Morykoni? [1] This is very strange situation for me. Best regards Kmicic ( talk) 20:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for comments.
Ted Sidpickle ( talk) 06:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello
I have contested the speedy deletion nomination
Could you please help me with recovering this article?
Best wishes,
NeviRom (
talk) 13:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
? Thanks a lot!
NeviRom (
talk) 08:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Hi Piotrus, I have recently finished going through unassessed child lit project articles and have commenced going through their stubby low importance articles (starting with the last ones of course:)). I have just placed a notability tag on the above article which you created in Nov 2007. It has had a ref tag since April 2008. I went to the polish wikipedia to find some useable references but their article doesn't have any references either. Are you able to find some references, I have started a google search but as most of the pages found are in the Polish language which I don't know it is pretty slow going, or would it be okay to put it up for afd? thanks. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Headlines · Highlights · Single page · Newsroom · Archives · Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, here is another one you created in June 2007. Again, nothing has really been added since then, I have added notability and ref tags. Again, I have checked with the Polish Wikipedia, where the article has a reference tag. It does have a reference but is unverifiable as its not online. Similarly, can it be improved or should it just be put up for afd? ps. sorry but the wikilab list of stubby/low Child Lit articles has at the end of the list articles with non-English so not sure if there are more Polish ones. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 16:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Cas Liber ( submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.
Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa ( talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email) 16:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
On 6 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gellner's theory of nationalism, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Gellner's theory has been called "the best-known modernist explanatory theory of nationalism"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gellner's theory of nationalism. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 09:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, can you expand?♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Document Number Nine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circular. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Created but incomplete (for now) List of controversial killings of African Americans in the 2010s. Oh, and that girl is kawaii. starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 02:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus,
Thanks for putting in the word secret. I do think that makes it better, although the page seems to have been reverted.
Probably it has to be worded very carefully, to the effect the Congress and its staffers have not been given access to the wording, while corporate lawyers have.
I appreciate your work in trying to make the article more illuminating within the constraints imposed by the system.
Son of eugene ( talk) 07:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't mean that I have a pile of time to sit and edit, but I'm back to keep my eye on Podlaskie and related articles. Ajh1492 ( talk) 15:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Per your request, I will be creating an updated version of File:Enwp_retention_vs_active_editors.png. I'll probably have it ready during this coming week. Dragons flight ( talk) 17:28, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
Sadly, I'm useless when it comes to inline references - I only manage the English-only ones reasonably because of the Make Reference Tool https://tools.wmflabs.org/makeref/ and because I can read English (and sadly not Polish). When I'm translating (c/- enthusiasm and Google Translate) I'm often lost and can't read what the text is referring to. Fortunately, the people who did the original amazing Polish version of Tchorek Plaques, came back and added the references back in. So they might be more help to you than me - sorry!
Escottf ( talk) 06:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey Piotr, would it be possible to access (and read) your findings under your research (papers) Why editors reduce activity and Arbitration Committee and decision-making on Wikipedia? Feel free to email me directly, or ping me on my talk page. Thank you in advance! Kalliope (WMF) ( talk) 06:59, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
On 23 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Szeptycki family, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that six members of the Polish- Ruthenian noble Szeptycki family were bishops, some Eastern Catholic and one Roman Catholic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Szeptycki family. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 07:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you...I love cats. I'll save that on my user page! WQUlrich ( talk) 18:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Piotr. Back in October of last year, you put a PROD on EWise, and I deleted the article. An editor by the name of SalineBrain has now posted a message to my talk page, expressing disagreement with the deletion, so I have restored the article. You may like to take it to Articles for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus, I must say im really new to wikipedia and i dont understand all the usual fluff around, and dont understand why to delete [Peace race U23]. The race is new and separate race, which is hoping to follow history of [Peace race] but is not the same as world of cycling has evolved since end of era od "amateur" category and so on. In just three years it moved to Ncup category (same as Avenir) and as such it needs separate page where community will be definitely working on this article in future. Adding more and more resources takes time and i wish someone would help me with that. But not delete. JanBrychtaSC ( talk) 09:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Cześć. Zupełnie nie rozumiem Twojej polityki. Przetłumaczone hasła z polskiej Wikipedii oznaczasz do usunięcia itp. W pl wiki możesz od razu sprawdzić, czy dane hasło może być encyklopedyczne. W tym wypadku powinieneś ewentualnie coś zasugerować bądź dodać jakieś źródło... Takich przypadków zauważyłem wiele. Przykładem jest SARP Honorary Award - najbardziej prestiżowa nagroda przyznawana polskim architektom. Anonim WX ( talk) 10:19, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Please explain in specific detail how I can improve June Julian page. Thank you. Lincoln spencer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lincolnspencer ( talk • contribs) 14:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Headlines · Highlights · Single page · Newsroom · Archives · Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
On 2 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Guryong Village, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Seoul slum of Guryong lies across the street from the luxurious Dogok-dong district? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Guryong Village. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 22:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John III Sobieski may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 09:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi!
Hope all is well. I recently saw that you made an edit on No Gun Ri Massacre. Since we're in the midst of a dispute resolution and edit process, we'd all really appreciate if some uninvolved editors (including yourself) would consider lending a hand by providing a third opinion and generally helping to moderate. This would be very valuable.
Thanks,
GeneralizationsAreBad ( talk) 00:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Viktar Kopack
@Tatiana Matlina: Please explain how those sources help to meet the requirements of WP:ARTIST. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Viktar_Kopach&action=edit§ion=1# They help fulfill these criteria, particularly (d)Pustelnik (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC) "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.fillment of this criterion: "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums" Pustelnik ( talk) 16:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Viktar Kopack
@Tatiana Matlina: Please explain how those sources help to meet the requirements of WP:ARTIST. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Viktar_Kopach&action=edit§ion=1# They help fulfill these criteria, particularly (d)Pustelnik (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC) "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.fillment of this criterion: "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums" Pustelnik ( talk) 16:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has created new interfaces for the link and citation tools, as well as fixing many bugs and changing some elements of the design. Some of these bugs affected users of VisualEditor on mobile devices. Status reports are posted on Mediawiki.org. The worklist for April through June is available in Phabricator.
A test of VisualEditor's effect on new editors at the English Wikipedia has just completed the first phase. During this test, half of newly registered editors had VisualEditor automatically enabled, and half did not. The main goal of the study is to learn which group was more likely to save an edit and to make productive, unreverted edits. Initial results will be posted at Meta later this month.
Auto-fill features for citations are available at a few Wikipedias through the citoid service. Citoid takes a URL or DOI for a reliable source, and returns a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. If Citoid is enabled on your wiki, then the design of the citation workflow changed during May. All citations are now created inside a single tool. Inside that tool, choose the tab you want (⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-auto⧽, ⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-manual⧽, or ⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-reuse⧽). The cite button is now labeled with the word "⧼visualeditor-toolbar-cite-label⧽" rather than a book icon, and the autofill citation dialog now has a more meaningful label, "⧼Citoid-citeFromIDDialog-lookup-button⧽", for the submit button.
The link tool has been redesigned based on feedback from Wikipedia editors and user testing. It now has two separate sections: one for links to articles and one for external links. When you select a link, its pop-up context menu shows the name of the linked page, a thumbnail image from the linked page, Wikidata's description, and/or appropriate icons for disambiguation pages, redirect pages and empty pages. Search results have been reduced to the first five pages. Several bugs were fixed, including a dark highlight that appeared over the first match in the link inspector ( T98085).
The special character inserter in VisualEditor now uses the same special character list as the wikitext editor. Admins at each wiki can also create a custom section for frequently used characters at the top of the list. Please read the instructions for customizing the list at mediawiki.org. Also, there is now a tooltip to describing each character in the special character inserter ( T70425).
Several improvements have been made to templates. When you search for a template to insert, the list of results now contains descriptions of the templates. The parameter list inside the template dialog now remains open after inserting a parameter from the list, so that users don’t need to click on "⧼visualeditor-dialog-transclusion-add-param⧽" each time they want to add another parameter ( T95696). The team added a new property for TemplateData, "Example", for template parameters. This optional, translatable property will show up when there is text describing how to use that parameter ( T53049).
The design of the main toolbar and several other elements have changed slightly, to be consistent with the MediaWiki theme. In the Vector skin, individual items in the menu are separated visually by pale gray bars. Buttons and menus on the toolbar can now contain both an icon and a text label, rather than just one or the other. This new design feature is being used for the cite button on wikis where the Citoid service is enabled.
The team has released a long-desired improvement to the handling of non-existent images. If a non-existent image is linked in an article, then it is now visible in VisualEditor and can be selected, edited, replaced, or removed.
Subscribe, unsubscribe or change the page where this newsletter is delivered at Meta. If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 17:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Piotr Skarga you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dudley Miles -- Dudley Miles ( talk) 22:41, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I'd like to confront your opinion - why do you think it is an event not notable enough for saving? There are plenty of private webpages referring to awards gained during many editions of this event (just a few:)
http://www.annakrenz.net/krenz_bio.html http://sard.lau.edu.lb/departments-institutes/aid/faculty-staff/maroun-el-daccache.php http://www.amphibianarc.com/projects/monument-to-copernicus/
Could you explain me how to improve this article?
User0253 ( talk) 22:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
You prodded Merì Grigoryan, a reasonable step to take. Since the PROD was challenged by Spinosa76 ( talk · contribs), you might want to go the WP:AFD route. 67.101.6.3 ( talk) 23:50, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Dear Piotrus, im trying to improve this article to meet the notability criteria, and i think i found a source who will help a lot in the same web site you found a weak source, [2]. Pointing that i understand nothing of polish language what i read in this source is the indepth coverage of the final match of the tournament and links to coverage of the other matches as well, so i would like your help to make this article meet all the criteria before the end of the discussion. thanks in advance, with the best regards, Argemiro1975 ( talk) 13:55, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:
Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotruś
I'd be grateful for your advice about the following....
Since I first saw the Gęsiówka article on English Wikipedia last year it has been greatly improved by myself and others. Is it OK to remove the following now?
This article needs additional citations for
verification. (April 2014) |
You can help expand this article with text translated from
the corresponding article in Polish. (March 2012) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
Citations have been added and I also included the key points from the Polish article and other information....
Cheers, Ivanevian ( talk) 15:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Another user rejected the DYK as per the article needing more sources to better-verify content in the hook. I added several more sources verifying the content, so requesting for you to revisit the discussion page. North America 1000 20:53, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Long time no see! How's your semester? Now I'm started to writing my Ph.D thesis. And KWA also makes efforts for make promote wikimedia projects in Korea. Recently, In the May 30, KWA made a meeting in Gangnam-gu office - and in this meeting, we made of speeches for make Wikipedia(and Wikimedia Projects) clubs in Universities in Korea. And now I want to recommend for make contact into ko:User:Motoko C. K., using the [[:m:위키미디어_대한민국#연락 방법 | Contact Us|official contacts in our Association]]. She is a secretary general in our 'usergroup', And speaks more good english than me. And I also recommend to make participate into ko:위키백과:오프라인 모임/2015년 6월 27일. This meeting will be done in Korean, but You can meet our members, and I think you can make important points for make your dream into real thing. - Ellif ( Talk) 19:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Cześć Piotrek, mam pytanie. Czemu nie mogę zastosować transkluzji do podstron dla stopni instruktorskich w ZHP? Na Wikidata wymagają by linkować do osobnych stron (opcjonalnie podstron). To dlatego zrobiłem strony drugiego poziomu (po ukośniku). Te "artykuły" (podstrony) są takie same pod względem encyklopedyczności jak odpowiedniki na polskiej Wikipedii. Superjurek ( talk) 11:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus. Could you please explain to me which problems do you see in this article according to WP:N. As you can see, the article has a lot of references, which show the notability of the subject. Additionaly, Elena Nekrasova was a finalist of the prestigious Russian literary prize Russian Booker, so I have to disagree with your template. PS I am experienced ru-wiki user, so I am familiar with the wikipedian guidelines ;) GEKGTS ( talk) 18:44, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello friends! We have been hard at work these past two months. For this report:
For the first time, we are happy to bring you an exhaustive, comprehensive WikiProject Directory. This directory endeavors to list every single WikiProject on the English Wikipedia, including those that don't participate in article assessment. In constructing the broadest possible definition, we have come up with a list of approximately 2,600 WikiProjects. The directory tracks activity statistics on the WikiProject's pages, and, for where it's available, statistics on the number of articles tracked by the WikiProject and the number of editors active on those articles. Complementing the directory are description pages for each project, listing usernames of people active on the WikiProject pages and the articles in the WikiProject's scope. This will help Wikipedians interested in a subject find each other, whether to seek feedback on an article or to revive an old project. (There is an opt-out option.) We have also come up with listings of related WikiProjects, listing the ten most relevant WikiProjects based on what articles they have in common. We would like to promote WikiProjects as interconnected systems, rather than isolated silos.
A tremendous amount of work went into preparing this directory. WikiProjects do not consistently categorize their pages, meaning we had to develop our own index to match WikiProjects with the articles in their scope. We also had to make some adjustments to how WikiProjects were categorized; indeed, I personally have racked up a few hundred edits re-categorizing WikiProjects. There remains more work to be done to make the WikiProject directory truly useful. In the meantime, take a look and feel free to leave feedback at the WikiProject X talk page.
What have we been working on?
Want us to work on any other tools? Interested in volunteering? Leave a note on our talk page.
The database report which lists WikiProjects according to the number of watchers (i.e., people that have the project on their watchlist), is back! The report stopped being updated a year ago, following the deactivation of the Toolserver, but a replacement report has been generated.
Zobacze co sie da zrobic w weekend.-- MyMoloboaccount ( talk) 19:13, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
On 22 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article André Langrand-Dumonceau, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that André Langrand-Dumonceau, a mid-19th-century Belgian financier, was convicted of financial fraud, tried in absentia, and died in exile? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/André Langrand-Dumonceau. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 15:46, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring the talk page and adding associations with relevant Australian projects! CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 12:00, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Headlines · Highlights · Single page · Newsroom · Archives · Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
On 1 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article P (symbol), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the "P"-badge (pictured) for Polish forced laborers was the first official, public badge introduced by Nazi Germany, preceding the " Jewish yellow star" by over a year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/P (symbol). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear @ Piotrus: thank you for your attention given to the new article about Israel Beck. Article's talk page Talk:Israel_Beck now explains why I disagree with your proposed deletion. Waiting for your feedback and hopefully removal of the proposed deletion. Diamantexpert ( talk) 09:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Internet intermediary at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Daniel Case ( talk) 17:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Smart Sheriff at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 00:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, I would like to recreate the article which was deleted - Mercator Medical S.A. I think that it meets criteria and it is notable because Mercator Medical is the first polish company which has done industrial investment in Thailand, have plans for investing more money in Thailand's area. It has 1% of sales of medical gloves globally with an appetite for more. Mercator delivers gloves to 45 countries across the world. Mercator expands on the US/Africa market in near future. It is noted on GPW. Please reconsider your thoughts about MM article and let me know, how can I improve it to pass the verification. Wubes123 ( talk) 11:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Category:BattleTech technology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Izno ( talk) 13:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Could you add info from this book to the article? Particularly on interest payments? That section is particularly spotty. I found brief mentions that at some point 10% of the loan was repaid, but nothing reliable. I tried google translate, but it is too long and thick for me. Thanks! Renata ( talk) 04:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed your edit of 23 March 2015 on Islamic State of Iraq, mentioning a "C-Class" qualification. Can you explain to me where and when and how such decisions are reached or decided, especially also in this case? As long as I don't know the answers to that, I of course can't yet say whether or not I agree with this quality sign. But, considering I've already done some (hard) work on the article to improve it (Feb 2015), it might help me to hear and learn what sort of criticism exactly is still being felt and expressed, in regard to that article. -- Corriebertus ( talk) 12:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
Could you be more specific as to the deletion of Janek Ambros? I made the page for him and he's had more than one event, having directed the upcoming documentary "Imminent Threat" with Academy Award nominee James Cromwell that will be in theatres September 4th and produced "Ten Thousand Saints" a film staring 4 time Oscar nominee Ethan Hawke, Oscar nominee Hailee Steinfeld, and Asa Butterfield. This is among the more than twenty independent/art house films he's made for nearly half a decade.
Paulrifkin ( talk) 17:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)paul rifkin
Hey,
Thanks for the help. You can check out the page of "Janek Ambros" now, it's much more detailed and referenced.
How do I paste my argument into "Articles Talk"? And what do you mean by "remove the prod?"
Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulrifkin ( talk • contribs) 17:29, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear Piotr, perhaps you remember me…yet we don’t are in contact for a long time. In short, I got an e-mail from the French Wikipedia asking me to translate this article from English to French. Even my French is pretty rusty nowadays I did it as better as I could in order to help. My poor French is not the issue here. The title is.
French Wikipedia administrators disagree with it too.
Reading the Talk page I saw you disagree with the title too. Unfortunately this article is not in Polish Wikipedia. Also, it was already translated to Spanish, Russian, Ukrainian and Iranian… always with the same title (unfortunately).
In Polish History books…what is the usual name? I believe it was just a civil war concerning succession rather a “war of succession” properly. You suggested another name but nobody renamed the article. Take care, -- Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin ( talk) 01:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
The article Piotr Skarga you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Piotr Skarga for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dudley Miles -- Dudley Miles ( talk) 14:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Krzyzac3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:31, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Headlines · Highlights · Single page · Newsroom · Archives · Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Janusz Zajdel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes ( talk) 03:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
The article Janusz Zajdel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Janusz Zajdel for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes ( talk) 03:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
I need your advice.
Some fool—probably a middle-school pupil in Italy—keeps dumping random Italian scientists into the " List of multiple discoveries".
He obviously doesn't understand the concept of " multiple discovery", described by various sociologists, including Robert K. Merton.
I'm tired of trying to enlighten him and constantly reverting his idiocies.
How does one get this article protected?
Thanks.
Nihil novi ( talk) 10:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
You're canvassing. Assume good faith and respect Wikipedia:Civility. Don't call other people PUPIL and don't say that my edits are idiocies.-- Libesruinssineced ( talk) 21:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
The article Janusz Zajdel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Janusz Zajdel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes ( talk) 15:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Local subscription list • Subscribe to the multilingual edition
Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team have been working on mobile phone support. They have fixed many bugs and improved language support. They post weekly status reports on mediawiki.org. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving language support and functionality on mobile devices.
The team attended Wikimania 2015 in Mexico City. There they participated in the Hackathon and met with individuals and groups of users. They also made several presentations about VisualEditor and the future of editing.
Following Wikimania, we announced winners for the VisualEditor 2015 Translathon. Our thanks and congratulations to users Halan-tul, Renessaince, जनक राज भट्ट (Janak Bhatta), Vahe Gharakhanyan, Warrakkk, and Eduardogobi.
For interface messages (translated at translatewiki.net), we saw the initiative affecting 42 languages. The average progress in translations across all languages was 56.5% before the translathon, and 78.2% after (+21.7%). In particular, Sakha improved from 12.2% to 94.2%; Brazilian Portuguese went from 50.6% to 100%; Taraškievica went from 44.9% to 85.3%; Doteli went from 1.3% to 41.2%. Also, while 1.7% of the messages were outdated across all languages before the translathon, the percentage dropped to 0.8% afterwards (-0.9%).
For documentation messages (on mediawiki.org), we saw the initiative affecting 24 languages. The average progress in translations across all languages was 26.6% before translathon, and 46.9% after (+20.3%). There were particularly notable achievements for three languages. Armenian improved from 1% to 99%; Swedish, from 21% to 99%, and Brazilian Portuguese, from 34% to 83%. Outdated translations across all languages were reduced from 8.4% before translathon to 4.8% afterwards (-3.6%).
We published some graphs showing the effect of the event on the Translathon page. Thank you to the translators for participating and the translatewiki.net staff for facilitating this initiative.
Auto-fill features for citations can be enabled on each Wikipedia. The tool uses the citoid service to convert a URL or DOI into a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. You can see an animated GIF of the quick, simple process at mediawiki.org. So far, about a dozen Wikipedias have enabled the auto-citation tool. To enable it for your wiki, follow the instructions at mediawiki.org.
Your wiki can customize the first section of the special character inserter in VisualEditor. Please follow the instructions at mediawiki.org to put the characters you want at the top.
In other changes, if you need to fill in a CAPTCHA and get it wrong, then you can click to get a new one to complete. VisualEditor can now display and edit Vega-based graphs. If you use the Monobook skin, VisualEditor's appearance is now more consistent with other software.
The team will be changing the appearance of selected links inside VisualEditor. The purpose is to make it easy to see whether your cursor is inside or outside the link. When you select a link, the link label (the words shown on the page) will be enclosed in a faint box. If you place your cursor inside the box, then your changes to the link label will be part of the link. If you place your cursor outside the box, then it will not. This will make it easy to know when new characters will be added to the link and when they will not.
On the English Wikipedia, 10% of newly created accounts are now offered both the visual and the wikitext editors. A recent controlled trial showed no significant difference in survival or productivity for new users in the short term. New users with access to VisualEditor were very slightly less likely to produce results that needed reverting. You can learn more about this by watching a video of the July 2015 Wikimedia Research Showcase. The proportion of new accounts with access to both editing environments will be gradually increased over time. Eventually all new users have the choice between the two editing environments.
If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact Elitre directly, so that she can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 00:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
On 8 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Smart Sheriff, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that South Korea has introduced Smart Sheriff, the world's first government-mandated parental monitoring app, which has raised concerns over spyware and Internet privacy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Smart Sheriff. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 05:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm pursuing a One Piece Wiki link in the article One Piece, and require your continued input in this discussion. Speeditor ( talk) 20:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Given that you did not further respond to the sources provided, should one understand that you are now convinced this article should exist? Samsara 00:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, do you know how delete a category with typo? [3] Regards, Kmicic ( talk) 13:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jarosław Lipszyc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free culture. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! I'm glad you liked the article. Sorry to say, the last time one of my articles was featured, it got the attention of several...um...inexperienced editors whose contributions would have been better left uncontributed, so I'm a bit hesitant to do it again. Happy editing! WQUlrich ( talk) 17:46, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Headlines · Highlights · Single page · Newsroom · Archives · Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.
In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far Casliber ( submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was Coemgenus ( submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.
The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:
The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.
Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!
Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs), Miyagawa ( talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear Piotrus,
Michael Gericke is worthy of a Wikipedia page. He is a senior partner of Pentagram, widely considered to be one of the most important design firms in the world. Many if not most of our other partners have biographies on Wikipedia. He is a member of the Alliance Graphique Internationale, the world's organization of distinguished graphic designers. He has designed many iconic symbols, logos and graphic systems.
We have been adding additional information and citations and working to expand the biography.
I work for Michael and I understand the conflict of interest, but it is our hope that others will build on and expand the bio.
I appreciate your help and ask that you not delete the biography.
Kurtck ( talk) 17:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from Marek Sikora (astronomer), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
Also, please note that the article in question was used as an example on Jimbo's talk page, so deleting it tomorrow would likely be disruptive to that conversation. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 21:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
got your message, i don't really understand how to respond, but, thanks? Jm3 ( talk) 05:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the time you took to help improve Antoni Koper, and your generous message. Your interest is encouraging, especially considering your extensive contributions on Polish topics. I'm especially eager to follow up on your suggestion to submit the article to DYK. I'm expecting an image of the subject to be uploaded to the commons within the next week. Should I perhaps wait until I've added the image to the infobox? I'd be grateful for your advice on that point. Malcom Gregory Scott ( talk) 07:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus! Thank you for looking at the CaratLane page. I am writing in response to your message and proposed deletion of the article. The reason you put forward was because it did not meet the general notability guidelines. The second time I submitted the article in question for creation, it was accepted in terms of notability i.e. it met the requirements of significant coverage, reliable secondary sources (all newspaper and independent third-party sources.) This was supported by members of the help group from where I had asked for guidance at that time and the wiki editor who rejected the article previously, in addition to the next wiki editor who approved its creation. With feedback from the help group and the first wiki editor, references are links from various independent, third party sources including VCCircle, The Hindu and Business Standard
The recent edit to the already published CaratLane page was with regard to a 3D Application which is a new feature in the jewellery buying market in India. This is a change from the traditional method of going to a store to buy jewellery. This news was sourced from International Business Times and the Business Standard. If this edit is a problem do let me know how to improve it. CaratLane has been in the news more since this article was created and I am working on adding the new information to the page - I hope this will contribute to bettering this page. I will be happy if you can take another look at it once I am done with the edits and provide any suggestions.
With the support of the above links, I have removed the Proposed deletion tag on this page. And have posted these supporting reasons on the article's talk page. Do let me know if you have any further suggestions to make this page better. As a new member of Wikipedia, I am eager to learn. Thank you ([[User:Kiranbramakrishna|Kiranbramakrishna]]|[[User talk:Kiranbramakrishna|t]] )([[User:Kiranbramakrishna|COI]]) ( talk) 10:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I could accept the quote without a reference to a peer-reviewed publication. However, during a FA nomination I was several times reminded that no primary source can be cited without a connected reference to a secondary source (either by the quote or in the text). I think we should search a secondary source which explicitly writes of or refers to Wipo's quoted text. Borsoka ( talk) 17:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your attention and help. Please note that the article was accepted by WordSeventeen in May 2015. Can it become unaccepted after that? I am a new Wikipedia contributor and would very much appreciated detailed directions on getting this article published Dr Julian is an internationally recognized art educator & artist. Thank you 18:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Lincolnspencer ( talk)
Thank you for the lively debate in Articles for Deletion discussion. Can I add remarks there? Can you explain why it was accepted once and now rejected? Could I possibly request more time to establish notability? As noted already, she has previously published articles in ERIC & ARTSTOR (see links), and a chapter in a newNAEA book, Exploration of Virtual Worlds: New Digital Multi-Media Literacy Investigations for Art Education among others. Dr. Julian represents a particular hybrid as a Polish/Italian American artist & art educator. Should she be in a different category than the present one? Please do not delete this article-I definitely want to put in the work to make it acceptable. Thank you for all of your suggestions. LS Lincolnspencer ( talk) 15:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Piotrus, Thank you and everyone for the comments on the Articles for Deletion Page. Can you tell me how to add my reply there? I am a new Wikipedia contributor. However, I will work diligently to verify the sources I have used in the article by contacting them and getting the correct citation, How much time do I have? Lincolnspencer ( talk) 22:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Saw the proposed deletion on Fiksu and wanted to respond. I thought the extensive list of secondary sources cited -- including what should be reliable secondary sources such as Inc. (magazine)., The Boston Globe, The Boston Business Journal, and VentureBeat -- would establish notability? Many of the linked references are substantial pieces of coverage of the company. Please let me know where you feel notability is falling short - thanks. Snackwell ( talk) 19:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm Cydevil38. The linked source is an online version of Encyclopedia of Korean Culture by Academy of Korean Studies. There are paper and digital versions available, but I don't have the page number for it. A more detailed online version is here [4], but from there, a specific article cannot be linked. From that version, the author is 신형식(Hyungsik Sin). It has three references, which are Samguk Yusa and two secondary sources. I've looked over some secondary sources, there are some linking it to Hongshan Culture. 121.161.79.248 ( talk) 22:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the delayed response. Here are some contents that can be added. One is a content removed by Ogress due to lack of citation [6]. In the Korean version, it is cited from "신종원, 단군신화에 보이는 樹木信仰, 韓國史學史學報 8, 5-22 (2003)". It should be noted that she also removed Hangul name of the article, and then specified that it is within the Korean peninsula. Specification of a location of Shinshi is, to say the least, not cited.
To go further, it is part of a section called "Meaning". Korean contents are as follows:
The bold part is the content that Ogress removed. Additional Korean contents are a bit complex, and I don't think I have knowledge in field to properly translate it. You can find a lot of English sources in these searches [7] [8].
As for my linked source, I can't find the page because it's online. It can be cited as an online source, with a bit more information like the article's author and publication date of the Encyclopedia.
"신시(Shinshi)", Encyclopedia of Korean Culture, Academy of Korean Studies, retrieved August 13, 2015
신, 형식 (2009), "신시", Encyclopedia of Korean Culture, Academy of Korean Studies, retrieved August 13, 2015
Another nicely referenced tertiary source in Korean is this article: [9]. It has much more information than the one I have cited.
121.161.79.216 ( talk) 04:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Surprised to see that my article, June Julian, has been deleted. I never had a chance to make the suggested corrections, nor vote or add my comments to the articles for deletion discussion. Can you please reinstate it so I can make those corrections. Besides having a recent exhibition sponsored by the US Embassy in Italy with supporting press links, and now having her work currently being considered by curatorial review in several major museums, I was attempting to get additional verifiable citations for her published work.Additionally it was in the process for review by WP: Women Artists. Would you please help me to continue to work on this article. Thank you for your attention. Lincolnspencer ( talk) 15:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 19:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus,
What is the best way to contact you on email? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Matt6007 (
talk •
contribs) 23:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
I recently noticed your WP:PROD tag on this article: [10]. Although I have not made contributions to the article directly nor am affiliated with the coin in any way, it should be noted that DASH is currently a leading X11 algorithm cryptocurrency in the cryptocurrency market right now. Please be cautious before putting WP:PROD templates on articles related to subject areas you might not be very familiar with. If you reply to my message, please leave a talkback on my talk page or ping me in your reply, so that I know when you have responded and can reply to the conversation accordingly. -- JustBerry ( talk) 16:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear Piotrus, I have recently started working for the European University Foundation - Campus Europae and I am now taking care of the wiki page. I have seen that you gave the page a notability flag in march. A range of sources have been added since. I would appreciate if you could check whether the added resources are sufficient for removing the flag.
Kind Greetings, StefanJahnke ( talk) 08:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey Piotrus, I tried to improve the article a little bit. As I have tried to look for the Fintech companies in Baltic region I realized a number of them have a page on Wiki. Please let me know how to improve the article. Thank you. Viktorijagor ( talk) 11:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
how can I get this article in Polish? Is there a comparable one already? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pola.mola ( talk • contribs) 11:04, April 16, 2015 (UTC)
hi Piotrus, he meets following criteria: 1 sources - articles about him and reviews of his pieces appear on major austrian websites for music, german newspapers and austrian state tv website. his work was subject of radio broadcasts in different countries. 2 was commissioned to write major orchestral works for theatres and concert halls run by german, swiss or austrian state (f.i. only other polish composer who received commission by the viennese concert hall was - as far as i know - penderecki) 3 has won several competitions not established for newcomers
it is also in my opinion notable, that his work is regularly performed worldwide. his music has been performed in more then 20 countries on all continents (except of the antarctica), which is exceptional under polish musicians born in the 80s (but also earlier). by the way, you can find a number of articles of polish musicians on wiki, which - imo - don't meet the criteria and/or have no references from reliable sources. and there is no {notable?} entry or discussion about this topic. greetings, ute73 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ute73 ( talk • contribs) 07:12, April 17, 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I am a graphic designer and I create various Barnstars for Wikipedia which are not yet made by any one else (some are here below)-
But the problem is that these are 2.0 version thus they are not listed on Barnstars list. I mean I am not saying that mine is the best and should be listed, just asking if they should be added to the list or something other than the 2.0 version guidelines should be followed and then it could be added to the list?
By that I mean the
{{subst:The X Barnstar|message}}
I do not know how to create this and should I or not?
Thank You!
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
On 15 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lithuania–Poland border, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Lithuania–Poland border is the only land border that the Baltic States share with a country that is not a member of the Russian-aligned Commonwealth of Independent States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lithuania–Poland border. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 08:42, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Greetings! For this month's issue...
We have demos!
After a lengthy research and design process, we decided for WikiProject X to focus on two things:
We have a live demonstration of the new WikiProject workflow at WikiProject Women in Technology, a brand new WikiProject that was set up as an adjunct to a related edit-a-thon in Washington, DC. The goal is to surface action items for editors, and we intend on doing that through automatically updated working lists. We are looking into using SuggestBot to generate lists of outstanding tasks, and we are looking into additional options for automatic worklist generation. This takes the burden off of WikiProject editors to generate these worklists, though there is also a "requests" section for Wikipedians to make individual requests. (As of writing, these automated lists are not yet live, so you will see a blank space under "edit articles" on the demo WikiProject. Sorry about that!) I invite you to check out the WikiProject and leave feedback on WikiProject X's talk page.
Once the demo is sufficiently developed, we will be working on a limited deployment on our pilot WikiProjects. We have selected five for the first round of testing based on the highest potential for impact and will scale up from there.
While a re-designed WikiProject experience is much needed, that alone isn't enough. A WikiProject isn't any good if people have no way of discovering it. This is why we are also developing an automatically updated WikiProject directory. This directory will surface project-related metrics, including a count of active WikiProject participants and of active editors in that project's subject area. The purpose of these metrics is to highlight how active the WikiProject is at the given point of time, but also to highlight that project's potential for success. The directory is not yet live but there is a demonstration featuring a sampling of WikiProjects.
Each directory entry will link to a WikiProject description page which automatically list the active WikiProject participants and subject-area article editors. This allows Wikipedians to find each other based on the areas they are interested in, and this information can be used to revive a WikiProject, start a new one, or even for some other purpose. These description pages are not online yet, but they will use this template, if you want to get a feel of what they will look like.
We need volunteers!
WikiProject X is a huge undertaking, and we need volunteers to support our efforts, including testers and coders. Check out our volunteer portal and see what you can do to help us!
As an aside...
Wouldn't it be cool if lists of requested articles could not only be integrated directly with WikiProjects, but also shared between WikiProjects? Well, we got the crazy idea of having experimental software feature Flow deployed (on a totally experimental basis) on the new Article Request Workshop, which seeks to be a place where editors can "workshop" article ideas before they get created. It uses Flow because Flow allows, essentially, section-level categorization, and in the future will allow "sections" (known as "topics" within Flow) to be included across different pages. What this means is that you have a recommendation for a new article tagged by multiple WikiProjects, allowing for the recommendation to appear on lists for each WikiProject. This will facilitate inter-WikiProject collaboration and will help to reduce duplicated work. The Article Request Workshop is not entirely ready yet due to some bugs with Flow, but we hope to integrate it into our pilot WikiProjects at some point.
Harej ( talk) 00:57, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Elena Elk ( talk) 05:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Hi, Piotrus!
You proposed this article ( Alexander Telalim) for deletion because of the following concern:
"The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back..."
I'm sorry, this is my first article in the English Wikipedia, I may have missed some of the factors. The main mistake is absence links from non-English language.
At this point it is corrected. To the list of external sources added two TV shows with artists (including one devoted entirely to him) with national Bulgarian TV, two broadcast with National Bulgarian Radio, several interviews given to various publications and publishing houses in Bulgaria. If that's not enough, I can find other links.
In addition, fixed other minor bugs (internal links to other pages, etc.)
Moreover, this section requires adding a subsection "Bulgarian watercolor painters" to "Bulgarian painters." What do you think? (I plan to write a few articles about the Bulgarian watercolorist)
Thanks, Elena
(P.S. "Элена Элк" is my nickname at Russian and Bulgarian Wiki. Here I am "Elena Elk") — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elena Elk ( talk • contribs) 05:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Элена Элк (
talk) 08:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Еhe necessary changes are made and it seems that this is enough.
Thanks to all the participants in the discussion for the help
Elena Elk ( talk) 12:19, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Hi, Piotrus!
I agree with principle "one nick is one account", but in the rules says:
Editors who want to use more than one account for some valid reason should provide links between them on the respective user pages (see below), with an explanation of the purpose of each account or of the relationship between them.
I have the same nickname with different writing - in English (Elena Elk) and in Cyrillic (Элена Элк) because I am the editor of the English Wikipedia, and the editor of Russian and Bulgarian Wikipedia sections, where articles are writed in the Cyrillic alphabet.
As soon as we started the discussion, I immediately pointed to you my second nickname, that is, it seemed to me I act correctly.
If this is not so, I would like to understand whether can join the two accounts into one with preservation of the contributions of both and the date of occurrence of the oldest account of them? And if possible, who can do that?
Thanks you in advance, Elena Elk
Hi, This edit for gender and childhood is for an academic assignment. Our class is not listed, but it is for a Humanities class at Vanderbilt University. Our instructor is Dr. Leslie Kirby. Thanks.
Dunlapel ( talk) 05:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Palmiry massacre at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 21:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Re: Webster, Sheffield, Fleischman, Hitchcock & Chrystie
Hi you proposed this page for deletion on 7 April. I only noticed the PROD now, and the page is already deleted. I was the author of the page. Unfortunately I can't see what I wrote so that I can justify its existence.
I believe the page should continue to exist for the following reasons:
1. There is a detailed Wikipedia biography page for the law firm's founder, Bethuel M. Webster. 2. A link from Bethuel Webster's page to his law firm's page seemed helpful. 3. The former mayor of New York, John Lindsay, another prominent person with a Wikipedia biography, was also a partner of the Webster Sheffield law firm 4. It received regular coverage in the New York Times, a prominent newspaper. 5. Numerous defunct law firms are covered by Wikipedia articles, and defunct law firms of the United States is a recognized category. 6. Numerous defunct New York City establishments are covered by Wikipedia articles.
Can you please tell me what I can do to reinstate the page (beside writing it again), or appealing the PROD?
Best regards, Cbmccarthy ( talk) 19:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Dear Piotrus As a member of the WikiProject Poland, I would like to inform you about the constant vandalism of an unregistered user in the article called Rosa Raisa. Without sources, references or bibliography the user is changing the nationality and name of the character that the article is based on. Additionally the user also deleted all the categories at the bottom relating to Poland. I simply asked if he/she could include sources that support the argument, but this did not happen. I personally do not know the answer (the argument is about the nationality of Rosa Raisa; whether she declared herself Russian-Jewish or Polish-Jewish), but the user also threatened to report me simply for asking about a source.
I really ask for your help! THANKS Oliszydlowski (TALK) 22:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Oliszydlowski is flagrantly misrepresenting what happens. I DID provide the full reference, citing the authoritative book published by the US academic press. Even after I provided the reference on his talk page (which can also be found in the Wikipedia article on Rosa Raisa'se), Oliszydlowski again refused to respect the fact about this soprano. I used my IP address because I didn't have the Wikipedia account at that time. Now I have created it to report his abuse of Rosa Raisa's page. Oliszydlowski needs to provide his documented sources for his claims. I have already provided mine on his talk page. Resorting to misleading words such as "vandalism" is unethical, especially when lying that I didn't provide any source. See Oliszydlowski's talk page and the full citation of the book about Raisa I provided earlier today. Shameful! I will report this unethical and untruthful accusation as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiuserthea ( talk • contribs) 02:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
After the administrator Ed Johnston suggested Simon Segal as an example (or similar) for someone born in Bialystok in the 1890s, you went to Segal's page to insert "Polish-Jewish" for his identity. You referenced it to a general book (not his detailed biography). Note that other general books identify him as "Russian-Jewish". For example, Maren Tova Linett, "Modernism, Feminism, and Jewishness" (Cambridge University Press 2007, pg. 8): "Simon Segal, a compassionate Russian-Jewish painter." Another example-- Lilian PizzichiniI, "The Blue Hour: A Portrait of Jean Rhys" (Bloomsbury Lives of Women, 2010): "His name was Simon Segal. He was a melancholic Russian Jew" I have not removed your edit but assume that you would do it in the light of these alternative designations of his ethnicity. Wikiuserthea ( talk) 22:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, could you restore the article about Benedykt Morykoni? [1] This is very strange situation for me. Best regards Kmicic ( talk) 20:27, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for comments.
Ted Sidpickle ( talk) 06:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello
I have contested the speedy deletion nomination
Could you please help me with recovering this article?
Best wishes,
NeviRom (
talk) 13:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
? Thanks a lot!
NeviRom (
talk) 08:14, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Hi Piotrus, I have recently finished going through unassessed child lit project articles and have commenced going through their stubby low importance articles (starting with the last ones of course:)). I have just placed a notability tag on the above article which you created in Nov 2007. It has had a ref tag since April 2008. I went to the polish wikipedia to find some useable references but their article doesn't have any references either. Are you able to find some references, I have started a google search but as most of the pages found are in the Polish language which I don't know it is pretty slow going, or would it be okay to put it up for afd? thanks. Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Headlines · Highlights · Single page · Newsroom · Archives · Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, here is another one you created in June 2007. Again, nothing has really been added since then, I have added notability and ref tags. Again, I have checked with the Polish Wikipedia, where the article has a reference tag. It does have a reference but is unverifiable as its not online. Similarly, can it be improved or should it just be put up for afd? ps. sorry but the wikilab list of stubby/low Child Lit articles has at the end of the list articles with non-English so not sure if there are more Polish ones. Coolabahapple ( talk) 08:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 16:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was Cas Liber ( submissions) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on Corona Borealis and Microscopium - both of which received the maximum bonus.
Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.
The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round! Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa ( talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs · email) 16:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
On 6 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gellner's theory of nationalism, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Gellner's theory has been called "the best-known modernist explanatory theory of nationalism"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gellner's theory of nationalism. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 ( talk) 09:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, can you expand?♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Document Number Nine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circular. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Created but incomplete (for now) List of controversial killings of African Americans in the 2010s. Oh, and that girl is kawaii. starship .paint ~ ¡Olé! 02:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus,
Thanks for putting in the word secret. I do think that makes it better, although the page seems to have been reverted.
Probably it has to be worded very carefully, to the effect the Congress and its staffers have not been given access to the wording, while corporate lawyers have.
I appreciate your work in trying to make the article more illuminating within the constraints imposed by the system.
Son of eugene ( talk) 07:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't mean that I have a pile of time to sit and edit, but I'm back to keep my eye on Podlaskie and related articles. Ajh1492 ( talk) 15:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Per your request, I will be creating an updated version of File:Enwp_retention_vs_active_editors.png. I'll probably have it ready during this coming week. Dragons flight ( talk) 17:28, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi there,
Sadly, I'm useless when it comes to inline references - I only manage the English-only ones reasonably because of the Make Reference Tool https://tools.wmflabs.org/makeref/ and because I can read English (and sadly not Polish). When I'm translating (c/- enthusiasm and Google Translate) I'm often lost and can't read what the text is referring to. Fortunately, the people who did the original amazing Polish version of Tchorek Plaques, came back and added the references back in. So they might be more help to you than me - sorry!
Escottf ( talk) 06:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey Piotr, would it be possible to access (and read) your findings under your research (papers) Why editors reduce activity and Arbitration Committee and decision-making on Wikipedia? Feel free to email me directly, or ping me on my talk page. Thank you in advance! Kalliope (WMF) ( talk) 06:59, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
On 23 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Szeptycki family, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that six members of the Polish- Ruthenian noble Szeptycki family were bishops, some Eastern Catholic and one Roman Catholic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Szeptycki family. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Harrias talk 07:31, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you...I love cats. I'll save that on my user page! WQUlrich ( talk) 18:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Piotr. Back in October of last year, you put a PROD on EWise, and I deleted the article. An editor by the name of SalineBrain has now posted a message to my talk page, expressing disagreement with the deletion, so I have restored the article. You may like to take it to Articles for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:34, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Piotrus, I must say im really new to wikipedia and i dont understand all the usual fluff around, and dont understand why to delete [Peace race U23]. The race is new and separate race, which is hoping to follow history of [Peace race] but is not the same as world of cycling has evolved since end of era od "amateur" category and so on. In just three years it moved to Ncup category (same as Avenir) and as such it needs separate page where community will be definitely working on this article in future. Adding more and more resources takes time and i wish someone would help me with that. But not delete. JanBrychtaSC ( talk) 09:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Cześć. Zupełnie nie rozumiem Twojej polityki. Przetłumaczone hasła z polskiej Wikipedii oznaczasz do usunięcia itp. W pl wiki możesz od razu sprawdzić, czy dane hasło może być encyklopedyczne. W tym wypadku powinieneś ewentualnie coś zasugerować bądź dodać jakieś źródło... Takich przypadków zauważyłem wiele. Przykładem jest SARP Honorary Award - najbardziej prestiżowa nagroda przyznawana polskim architektom. Anonim WX ( talk) 10:19, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Please explain in specific detail how I can improve June Julian page. Thank you. Lincoln spencer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lincolnspencer ( talk • contribs) 14:04, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Headlines · Highlights · Single page · Newsroom · Archives · Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
On 2 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Guryong Village, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Seoul slum of Guryong lies across the street from the luxurious Dogok-dong district? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Guryong Village. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 22:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John III Sobieski may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 09:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi!
Hope all is well. I recently saw that you made an edit on No Gun Ri Massacre. Since we're in the midst of a dispute resolution and edit process, we'd all really appreciate if some uninvolved editors (including yourself) would consider lending a hand by providing a third opinion and generally helping to moderate. This would be very valuable.
Thanks,
GeneralizationsAreBad ( talk) 00:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Viktar Kopack
@Tatiana Matlina: Please explain how those sources help to meet the requirements of WP:ARTIST. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Viktar_Kopach&action=edit§ion=1# They help fulfill these criteria, particularly (d)Pustelnik (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC) "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.fillment of this criterion: "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums" Pustelnik ( talk) 16:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Viktar Kopack
@Tatiana Matlina: Please explain how those sources help to meet the requirements of WP:ARTIST. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Viktar_Kopach&action=edit§ion=1# They help fulfill these criteria, particularly (d)Pustelnik (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC) "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.fillment of this criterion: "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums" Pustelnik ( talk) 16:52, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has created new interfaces for the link and citation tools, as well as fixing many bugs and changing some elements of the design. Some of these bugs affected users of VisualEditor on mobile devices. Status reports are posted on Mediawiki.org. The worklist for April through June is available in Phabricator.
A test of VisualEditor's effect on new editors at the English Wikipedia has just completed the first phase. During this test, half of newly registered editors had VisualEditor automatically enabled, and half did not. The main goal of the study is to learn which group was more likely to save an edit and to make productive, unreverted edits. Initial results will be posted at Meta later this month.
Auto-fill features for citations are available at a few Wikipedias through the citoid service. Citoid takes a URL or DOI for a reliable source, and returns a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. If Citoid is enabled on your wiki, then the design of the citation workflow changed during May. All citations are now created inside a single tool. Inside that tool, choose the tab you want (⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-auto⧽, ⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-manual⧽, or ⧼citoid-citeFromIDDialog-mode-reuse⧽). The cite button is now labeled with the word "⧼visualeditor-toolbar-cite-label⧽" rather than a book icon, and the autofill citation dialog now has a more meaningful label, "⧼Citoid-citeFromIDDialog-lookup-button⧽", for the submit button.
The link tool has been redesigned based on feedback from Wikipedia editors and user testing. It now has two separate sections: one for links to articles and one for external links. When you select a link, its pop-up context menu shows the name of the linked page, a thumbnail image from the linked page, Wikidata's description, and/or appropriate icons for disambiguation pages, redirect pages and empty pages. Search results have been reduced to the first five pages. Several bugs were fixed, including a dark highlight that appeared over the first match in the link inspector ( T98085).
The special character inserter in VisualEditor now uses the same special character list as the wikitext editor. Admins at each wiki can also create a custom section for frequently used characters at the top of the list. Please read the instructions for customizing the list at mediawiki.org. Also, there is now a tooltip to describing each character in the special character inserter ( T70425).
Several improvements have been made to templates. When you search for a template to insert, the list of results now contains descriptions of the templates. The parameter list inside the template dialog now remains open after inserting a parameter from the list, so that users don’t need to click on "⧼visualeditor-dialog-transclusion-add-param⧽" each time they want to add another parameter ( T95696). The team added a new property for TemplateData, "Example", for template parameters. This optional, translatable property will show up when there is text describing how to use that parameter ( T53049).
The design of the main toolbar and several other elements have changed slightly, to be consistent with the MediaWiki theme. In the Vector skin, individual items in the menu are separated visually by pale gray bars. Buttons and menus on the toolbar can now contain both an icon and a text label, rather than just one or the other. This new design feature is being used for the cite button on wikis where the Citoid service is enabled.
The team has released a long-desired improvement to the handling of non-existent images. If a non-existent image is linked in an article, then it is now visible in VisualEditor and can be selected, edited, replaced, or removed.
Subscribe, unsubscribe or change the page where this newsletter is delivered at Meta. If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 17:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Piotr Skarga you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dudley Miles -- Dudley Miles ( talk) 22:41, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I'd like to confront your opinion - why do you think it is an event not notable enough for saving? There are plenty of private webpages referring to awards gained during many editions of this event (just a few:)
http://www.annakrenz.net/krenz_bio.html http://sard.lau.edu.lb/departments-institutes/aid/faculty-staff/maroun-el-daccache.php http://www.amphibianarc.com/projects/monument-to-copernicus/
Could you explain me how to improve this article?
User0253 ( talk) 22:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
You prodded Merì Grigoryan, a reasonable step to take. Since the PROD was challenged by Spinosa76 ( talk · contribs), you might want to go the WP:AFD route. 67.101.6.3 ( talk) 23:50, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Dear Piotrus, im trying to improve this article to meet the notability criteria, and i think i found a source who will help a lot in the same web site you found a weak source, [2]. Pointing that i understand nothing of polish language what i read in this source is the indepth coverage of the final match of the tournament and links to coverage of the other matches as well, so i would like your help to make this article meet all the criteria before the end of the discussion. thanks in advance, with the best regards, Argemiro1975 ( talk) 13:55, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:
Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotruś
I'd be grateful for your advice about the following....
Since I first saw the Gęsiówka article on English Wikipedia last year it has been greatly improved by myself and others. Is it OK to remove the following now?
This article needs additional citations for
verification. (April 2014) |
You can help expand this article with text translated from
the corresponding article in Polish. (March 2012) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
Citations have been added and I also included the key points from the Polish article and other information....
Cheers, Ivanevian ( talk) 15:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Another user rejected the DYK as per the article needing more sources to better-verify content in the hook. I added several more sources verifying the content, so requesting for you to revisit the discussion page. North America 1000 20:53, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Long time no see! How's your semester? Now I'm started to writing my Ph.D thesis. And KWA also makes efforts for make promote wikimedia projects in Korea. Recently, In the May 30, KWA made a meeting in Gangnam-gu office - and in this meeting, we made of speeches for make Wikipedia(and Wikimedia Projects) clubs in Universities in Korea. And now I want to recommend for make contact into ko:User:Motoko C. K., using the [[:m:위키미디어_대한민국#연락 방법 | Contact Us|official contacts in our Association]]. She is a secretary general in our 'usergroup', And speaks more good english than me. And I also recommend to make participate into ko:위키백과:오프라인 모임/2015년 6월 27일. This meeting will be done in Korean, but You can meet our members, and I think you can make important points for make your dream into real thing. - Ellif ( Talk) 19:37, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Cześć Piotrek, mam pytanie. Czemu nie mogę zastosować transkluzji do podstron dla stopni instruktorskich w ZHP? Na Wikidata wymagają by linkować do osobnych stron (opcjonalnie podstron). To dlatego zrobiłem strony drugiego poziomu (po ukośniku). Te "artykuły" (podstrony) są takie same pod względem encyklopedyczności jak odpowiedniki na polskiej Wikipedii. Superjurek ( talk) 11:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus. Could you please explain to me which problems do you see in this article according to WP:N. As you can see, the article has a lot of references, which show the notability of the subject. Additionaly, Elena Nekrasova was a finalist of the prestigious Russian literary prize Russian Booker, so I have to disagree with your template. PS I am experienced ru-wiki user, so I am familiar with the wikipedian guidelines ;) GEKGTS ( talk) 18:44, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello friends! We have been hard at work these past two months. For this report:
For the first time, we are happy to bring you an exhaustive, comprehensive WikiProject Directory. This directory endeavors to list every single WikiProject on the English Wikipedia, including those that don't participate in article assessment. In constructing the broadest possible definition, we have come up with a list of approximately 2,600 WikiProjects. The directory tracks activity statistics on the WikiProject's pages, and, for where it's available, statistics on the number of articles tracked by the WikiProject and the number of editors active on those articles. Complementing the directory are description pages for each project, listing usernames of people active on the WikiProject pages and the articles in the WikiProject's scope. This will help Wikipedians interested in a subject find each other, whether to seek feedback on an article or to revive an old project. (There is an opt-out option.) We have also come up with listings of related WikiProjects, listing the ten most relevant WikiProjects based on what articles they have in common. We would like to promote WikiProjects as interconnected systems, rather than isolated silos.
A tremendous amount of work went into preparing this directory. WikiProjects do not consistently categorize their pages, meaning we had to develop our own index to match WikiProjects with the articles in their scope. We also had to make some adjustments to how WikiProjects were categorized; indeed, I personally have racked up a few hundred edits re-categorizing WikiProjects. There remains more work to be done to make the WikiProject directory truly useful. In the meantime, take a look and feel free to leave feedback at the WikiProject X talk page.
What have we been working on?
Want us to work on any other tools? Interested in volunteering? Leave a note on our talk page.
The database report which lists WikiProjects according to the number of watchers (i.e., people that have the project on their watchlist), is back! The report stopped being updated a year ago, following the deactivation of the Toolserver, but a replacement report has been generated.
Zobacze co sie da zrobic w weekend.-- MyMoloboaccount ( talk) 19:13, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
On 22 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article André Langrand-Dumonceau, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that André Langrand-Dumonceau, a mid-19th-century Belgian financier, was convicted of financial fraud, tried in absentia, and died in exile? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/André Langrand-Dumonceau. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 15:46, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring the talk page and adding associations with relevant Australian projects! CtrlXctrlV ( talk) 12:00, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Headlines · Highlights · Single page · Newsroom · Archives · Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 20:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
On 1 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article P (symbol), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the "P"-badge (pictured) for Polish forced laborers was the first official, public badge introduced by Nazi Germany, preceding the " Jewish yellow star" by over a year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/P (symbol). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 13:05, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear @ Piotrus: thank you for your attention given to the new article about Israel Beck. Article's talk page Talk:Israel_Beck now explains why I disagree with your proposed deletion. Waiting for your feedback and hopefully removal of the proposed deletion. Diamantexpert ( talk) 09:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Internet intermediary at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Daniel Case ( talk) 17:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Smart Sheriff at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 00:55, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus, I would like to recreate the article which was deleted - Mercator Medical S.A. I think that it meets criteria and it is notable because Mercator Medical is the first polish company which has done industrial investment in Thailand, have plans for investing more money in Thailand's area. It has 1% of sales of medical gloves globally with an appetite for more. Mercator delivers gloves to 45 countries across the world. Mercator expands on the US/Africa market in near future. It is noted on GPW. Please reconsider your thoughts about MM article and let me know, how can I improve it to pass the verification. Wubes123 ( talk) 11:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Category:BattleTech technology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Izno ( talk) 13:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Could you add info from this book to the article? Particularly on interest payments? That section is particularly spotty. I found brief mentions that at some point 10% of the loan was repaid, but nothing reliable. I tried google translate, but it is too long and thick for me. Thanks! Renata ( talk) 04:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by
The Interior (
talk ·
contribs),
Ocaasi (
talk ·
contribs),
Sadads (
talk ·
contribs),
Nikkimaria (
talk ·
contribs)
The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed your edit of 23 March 2015 on Islamic State of Iraq, mentioning a "C-Class" qualification. Can you explain to me where and when and how such decisions are reached or decided, especially also in this case? As long as I don't know the answers to that, I of course can't yet say whether or not I agree with this quality sign. But, considering I've already done some (hard) work on the article to improve it (Feb 2015), it might help me to hear and learn what sort of criticism exactly is still being felt and expressed, in regard to that article. -- Corriebertus ( talk) 12:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
Could you be more specific as to the deletion of Janek Ambros? I made the page for him and he's had more than one event, having directed the upcoming documentary "Imminent Threat" with Academy Award nominee James Cromwell that will be in theatres September 4th and produced "Ten Thousand Saints" a film staring 4 time Oscar nominee Ethan Hawke, Oscar nominee Hailee Steinfeld, and Asa Butterfield. This is among the more than twenty independent/art house films he's made for nearly half a decade.
Paulrifkin ( talk) 17:06, 21 July 2015 (UTC)paul rifkin
Hey,
Thanks for the help. You can check out the page of "Janek Ambros" now, it's much more detailed and referenced.
How do I paste my argument into "Articles Talk"? And what do you mean by "remove the prod?"
Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulrifkin ( talk • contribs) 17:29, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear Piotr, perhaps you remember me…yet we don’t are in contact for a long time. In short, I got an e-mail from the French Wikipedia asking me to translate this article from English to French. Even my French is pretty rusty nowadays I did it as better as I could in order to help. My poor French is not the issue here. The title is.
French Wikipedia administrators disagree with it too.
Reading the Talk page I saw you disagree with the title too. Unfortunately this article is not in Polish Wikipedia. Also, it was already translated to Spanish, Russian, Ukrainian and Iranian… always with the same title (unfortunately).
In Polish History books…what is the usual name? I believe it was just a civil war concerning succession rather a “war of succession” properly. You suggested another name but nobody renamed the article. Take care, -- Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin ( talk) 01:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
The article Piotr Skarga you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Piotr Skarga for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dudley Miles -- Dudley Miles ( talk) 14:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Krzyzac3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:31, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Headlines · Highlights · Single page · Newsroom · Archives · Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:02, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Janusz Zajdel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes ( talk) 03:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
The article Janusz Zajdel you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Janusz Zajdel for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes ( talk) 03:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
I need your advice.
Some fool—probably a middle-school pupil in Italy—keeps dumping random Italian scientists into the " List of multiple discoveries".
He obviously doesn't understand the concept of " multiple discovery", described by various sociologists, including Robert K. Merton.
I'm tired of trying to enlighten him and constantly reverting his idiocies.
How does one get this article protected?
Thanks.
Nihil novi ( talk) 10:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
You're canvassing. Assume good faith and respect Wikipedia:Civility. Don't call other people PUPIL and don't say that my edits are idiocies.-- Libesruinssineced ( talk) 21:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
The article Janusz Zajdel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Janusz Zajdel for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes ( talk) 15:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Read this in another language • Local subscription list • Subscribe to the multilingual edition
Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team have been working on mobile phone support. They have fixed many bugs and improved language support. They post weekly status reports on mediawiki.org. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving language support and functionality on mobile devices.
The team attended Wikimania 2015 in Mexico City. There they participated in the Hackathon and met with individuals and groups of users. They also made several presentations about VisualEditor and the future of editing.
Following Wikimania, we announced winners for the VisualEditor 2015 Translathon. Our thanks and congratulations to users Halan-tul, Renessaince, जनक राज भट्ट (Janak Bhatta), Vahe Gharakhanyan, Warrakkk, and Eduardogobi.
For interface messages (translated at translatewiki.net), we saw the initiative affecting 42 languages. The average progress in translations across all languages was 56.5% before the translathon, and 78.2% after (+21.7%). In particular, Sakha improved from 12.2% to 94.2%; Brazilian Portuguese went from 50.6% to 100%; Taraškievica went from 44.9% to 85.3%; Doteli went from 1.3% to 41.2%. Also, while 1.7% of the messages were outdated across all languages before the translathon, the percentage dropped to 0.8% afterwards (-0.9%).
For documentation messages (on mediawiki.org), we saw the initiative affecting 24 languages. The average progress in translations across all languages was 26.6% before translathon, and 46.9% after (+20.3%). There were particularly notable achievements for three languages. Armenian improved from 1% to 99%; Swedish, from 21% to 99%, and Brazilian Portuguese, from 34% to 83%. Outdated translations across all languages were reduced from 8.4% before translathon to 4.8% afterwards (-3.6%).
We published some graphs showing the effect of the event on the Translathon page. Thank you to the translators for participating and the translatewiki.net staff for facilitating this initiative.
Auto-fill features for citations can be enabled on each Wikipedia. The tool uses the citoid service to convert a URL or DOI into a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. You can see an animated GIF of the quick, simple process at mediawiki.org. So far, about a dozen Wikipedias have enabled the auto-citation tool. To enable it for your wiki, follow the instructions at mediawiki.org.
Your wiki can customize the first section of the special character inserter in VisualEditor. Please follow the instructions at mediawiki.org to put the characters you want at the top.
In other changes, if you need to fill in a CAPTCHA and get it wrong, then you can click to get a new one to complete. VisualEditor can now display and edit Vega-based graphs. If you use the Monobook skin, VisualEditor's appearance is now more consistent with other software.
The team will be changing the appearance of selected links inside VisualEditor. The purpose is to make it easy to see whether your cursor is inside or outside the link. When you select a link, the link label (the words shown on the page) will be enclosed in a faint box. If you place your cursor inside the box, then your changes to the link label will be part of the link. If you place your cursor outside the box, then it will not. This will make it easy to know when new characters will be added to the link and when they will not.
On the English Wikipedia, 10% of newly created accounts are now offered both the visual and the wikitext editors. A recent controlled trial showed no significant difference in survival or productivity for new users in the short term. New users with access to VisualEditor were very slightly less likely to produce results that needed reverting. You can learn more about this by watching a video of the July 2015 Wikimedia Research Showcase. The proportion of new accounts with access to both editing environments will be gradually increased over time. Eventually all new users have the choice between the two editing environments.
If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact Elitre directly, so that she can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk) 00:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
On 8 August 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Smart Sheriff, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that South Korea has introduced Smart Sheriff, the world's first government-mandated parental monitoring app, which has raised concerns over spyware and Internet privacy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Smart Sheriff. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 05:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm pursuing a One Piece Wiki link in the article One Piece, and require your continued input in this discussion. Speeditor ( talk) 20:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Given that you did not further respond to the sources provided, should one understand that you are now convinced this article should exist? Samsara 00:44, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi, do you know how delete a category with typo? [3] Regards, Kmicic ( talk) 13:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jarosław Lipszyc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free culture. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! I'm glad you liked the article. Sorry to say, the last time one of my articles was featured, it got the attention of several...um...inexperienced editors whose contributions would have been better left uncontributed, so I'm a bit hesitant to do it again. Happy editing! WQUlrich ( talk) 17:46, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Headlines · Highlights · Single page · Newsroom · Archives · Unsubscribe
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 14:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.
In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far Casliber ( submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was Coemgenus ( submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.
The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:
The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.
Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!
Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs), Miyagawa ( talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 ( talk · contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear Piotrus,
Michael Gericke is worthy of a Wikipedia page. He is a senior partner of Pentagram, widely considered to be one of the most important design firms in the world. Many if not most of our other partners have biographies on Wikipedia. He is a member of the Alliance Graphique Internationale, the world's organization of distinguished graphic designers. He has designed many iconic symbols, logos and graphic systems.
We have been adding additional information and citations and working to expand the biography.
I work for Michael and I understand the conflict of interest, but it is our hope that others will build on and expand the bio.
I appreciate your help and ask that you not delete the biography.
Kurtck ( talk) 17:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from Marek Sikora (astronomer), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!
Also, please note that the article in question was used as an example on Jimbo's talk page, so deleting it tomorrow would likely be disruptive to that conversation. Etamni | ✉ | ✓ 21:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
got your message, i don't really understand how to respond, but, thanks? Jm3 ( talk) 05:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the time you took to help improve Antoni Koper, and your generous message. Your interest is encouraging, especially considering your extensive contributions on Polish topics. I'm especially eager to follow up on your suggestion to submit the article to DYK. I'm expecting an image of the subject to be uploaded to the commons within the next week. Should I perhaps wait until I've added the image to the infobox? I'd be grateful for your advice on that point. Malcom Gregory Scott ( talk) 07:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus! Thank you for looking at the CaratLane page. I am writing in response to your message and proposed deletion of the article. The reason you put forward was because it did not meet the general notability guidelines. The second time I submitted the article in question for creation, it was accepted in terms of notability i.e. it met the requirements of significant coverage, reliable secondary sources (all newspaper and independent third-party sources.) This was supported by members of the help group from where I had asked for guidance at that time and the wiki editor who rejected the article previously, in addition to the next wiki editor who approved its creation. With feedback from the help group and the first wiki editor, references are links from various independent, third party sources including VCCircle, The Hindu and Business Standard
The recent edit to the already published CaratLane page was with regard to a 3D Application which is a new feature in the jewellery buying market in India. This is a change from the traditional method of going to a store to buy jewellery. This news was sourced from International Business Times and the Business Standard. If this edit is a problem do let me know how to improve it. CaratLane has been in the news more since this article was created and I am working on adding the new information to the page - I hope this will contribute to bettering this page. I will be happy if you can take another look at it once I am done with the edits and provide any suggestions.
With the support of the above links, I have removed the Proposed deletion tag on this page. And have posted these supporting reasons on the article's talk page. Do let me know if you have any further suggestions to make this page better. As a new member of Wikipedia, I am eager to learn. Thank you ([[User:Kiranbramakrishna|Kiranbramakrishna]]|[[User talk:Kiranbramakrishna|t]] )([[User:Kiranbramakrishna|COI]]) ( talk) 10:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I could accept the quote without a reference to a peer-reviewed publication. However, during a FA nomination I was several times reminded that no primary source can be cited without a connected reference to a secondary source (either by the quote or in the text). I think we should search a secondary source which explicitly writes of or refers to Wipo's quoted text. Borsoka ( talk) 17:45, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your attention and help. Please note that the article was accepted by WordSeventeen in May 2015. Can it become unaccepted after that? I am a new Wikipedia contributor and would very much appreciated detailed directions on getting this article published Dr Julian is an internationally recognized art educator & artist. Thank you 18:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Lincolnspencer ( talk)
Thank you for the lively debate in Articles for Deletion discussion. Can I add remarks there? Can you explain why it was accepted once and now rejected? Could I possibly request more time to establish notability? As noted already, she has previously published articles in ERIC & ARTSTOR (see links), and a chapter in a newNAEA book, Exploration of Virtual Worlds: New Digital Multi-Media Literacy Investigations for Art Education among others. Dr. Julian represents a particular hybrid as a Polish/Italian American artist & art educator. Should she be in a different category than the present one? Please do not delete this article-I definitely want to put in the work to make it acceptable. Thank you for all of your suggestions. LS Lincolnspencer ( talk) 15:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Piotrus, Thank you and everyone for the comments on the Articles for Deletion Page. Can you tell me how to add my reply there? I am a new Wikipedia contributor. However, I will work diligently to verify the sources I have used in the article by contacting them and getting the correct citation, How much time do I have? Lincolnspencer ( talk) 22:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Saw the proposed deletion on Fiksu and wanted to respond. I thought the extensive list of secondary sources cited -- including what should be reliable secondary sources such as Inc. (magazine)., The Boston Globe, The Boston Business Journal, and VentureBeat -- would establish notability? Many of the linked references are substantial pieces of coverage of the company. Please let me know where you feel notability is falling short - thanks. Snackwell ( talk) 19:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm Cydevil38. The linked source is an online version of Encyclopedia of Korean Culture by Academy of Korean Studies. There are paper and digital versions available, but I don't have the page number for it. A more detailed online version is here [4], but from there, a specific article cannot be linked. From that version, the author is 신형식(Hyungsik Sin). It has three references, which are Samguk Yusa and two secondary sources. I've looked over some secondary sources, there are some linking it to Hongshan Culture. 121.161.79.248 ( talk) 22:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm sorry for the delayed response. Here are some contents that can be added. One is a content removed by Ogress due to lack of citation [6]. In the Korean version, it is cited from "신종원, 단군신화에 보이는 樹木信仰, 韓國史學史學報 8, 5-22 (2003)". It should be noted that she also removed Hangul name of the article, and then specified that it is within the Korean peninsula. Specification of a location of Shinshi is, to say the least, not cited.
To go further, it is part of a section called "Meaning". Korean contents are as follows:
The bold part is the content that Ogress removed. Additional Korean contents are a bit complex, and I don't think I have knowledge in field to properly translate it. You can find a lot of English sources in these searches [7] [8].
As for my linked source, I can't find the page because it's online. It can be cited as an online source, with a bit more information like the article's author and publication date of the Encyclopedia.
"신시(Shinshi)", Encyclopedia of Korean Culture, Academy of Korean Studies, retrieved August 13, 2015
신, 형식 (2009), "신시", Encyclopedia of Korean Culture, Academy of Korean Studies, retrieved August 13, 2015
Another nicely referenced tertiary source in Korean is this article: [9]. It has much more information than the one I have cited.
121.161.79.216 ( talk) 04:23, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Surprised to see that my article, June Julian, has been deleted. I never had a chance to make the suggested corrections, nor vote or add my comments to the articles for deletion discussion. Can you please reinstate it so I can make those corrections. Besides having a recent exhibition sponsored by the US Embassy in Italy with supporting press links, and now having her work currently being considered by curatorial review in several major museums, I was attempting to get additional verifiable citations for her published work.Additionally it was in the process for review by WP: Women Artists. Would you please help me to continue to work on this article. Thank you for your attention. Lincolnspencer ( talk) 15:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 19:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Piotrus,
What is the best way to contact you on email? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Matt6007 (
talk •
contribs) 23:10, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
I recently noticed your WP:PROD tag on this article: [10]. Although I have not made contributions to the article directly nor am affiliated with the coin in any way, it should be noted that DASH is currently a leading X11 algorithm cryptocurrency in the cryptocurrency market right now. Please be cautious before putting WP:PROD templates on articles related to subject areas you might not be very familiar with. If you reply to my message, please leave a talkback on my talk page or ping me in your reply, so that I know when you have responded and can reply to the conversation accordingly. -- JustBerry ( talk) 16:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear Piotrus, I have recently started working for the European University Foundation - Campus Europae and I am now taking care of the wiki page. I have seen that you gave the page a notability flag in march. A range of sources have been added since. I would appreciate if you could check whether the added resources are sufficient for removing the flag.
Kind Greetings, StefanJahnke ( talk) 08:53, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Hey Piotrus, I tried to improve the article a little bit. As I have tried to look for the Fintech companies in Baltic region I realized a number of them have a page on Wiki. Please let me know how to improve the article. Thank you. Viktorijagor ( talk) 11:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
how can I get this article in Polish? Is there a comparable one already? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pola.mola ( talk • contribs) 11:04, April 16, 2015 (UTC)
hi Piotrus, he meets following criteria: 1 sources - articles about him and reviews of his pieces appear on major austrian websites for music, german newspapers and austrian state tv website. his work was subject of radio broadcasts in different countries. 2 was commissioned to write major orchestral works for theatres and concert halls run by german, swiss or austrian state (f.i. only other polish composer who received commission by the viennese concert hall was - as far as i know - penderecki) 3 has won several competitions not established for newcomers
it is also in my opinion notable, that his work is regularly performed worldwide. his music has been performed in more then 20 countries on all continents (except of the antarctica), which is exceptional under polish musicians born in the 80s (but also earlier). by the way, you can find a number of articles of polish musicians on wiki, which - imo - don't meet the criteria and/or have no references from reliable sources. and there is no {notable?} entry or discussion about this topic. greetings, ute73 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ute73 ( talk • contribs) 07:12, April 17, 2015 (UTC)
Hello,
I am a graphic designer and I create various Barnstars for Wikipedia which are not yet made by any one else (some are here below)-
But the problem is that these are 2.0 version thus they are not listed on Barnstars list. I mean I am not saying that mine is the best and should be listed, just asking if they should be added to the list or something other than the 2.0 version guidelines should be followed and then it could be added to the list?
By that I mean the
{{subst:The X Barnstar|message}}
I do not know how to create this and should I or not?
Thank You!
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!