This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | → | Archive 45 |
Earlier this month
John Carter (
talk ·
contribs) was blocked by
BU Rob13 (
talk ·
contribs) for explicitly violating my interaction ban with him (which you implemented
here). Following the block,
Curly Turkey (
talk ·
contribs) and
Softlavender (
talk ·
contribs)
commented that he should receive a final warning for skirt[ing] the IBAN—including commenting in ANI threads directly below Hijiri while not actually mentioning Hijiri's name
and repeatedly stealth-violating the IBan while ostensibly appearing not to technically (in the very strictest sense)
, and
Kudpung (
talk ·
contribs) closed the thread and
didn't quite issue the exact final warning that was requested (as he didn't mention the stealth violations). Kudpung referred to "consensus", but everyone who commented specifically mentioned the stealth violations, which is why I think the post-block final warning probably should have mentioned these, but... Anyway, this is why I didn't seek any enforcement when he showed up on
WT:BIBLE shortly after me, and has been opening alternating threads with me for the last few weeks, having previously not edited there in almost a year (in one of the hounding incidents that led to the IBAN; he hadn't otherwise edited the page since May 2016 - see the timeline
here).
Just now, he posted this right below my saying something to the same effect (he pointed out that there are Orthodox bibles, I that there's a Jewish bible, both making the basic point that the OP's "Catholic vs. Protestant" dichotomy is flawed), in the first thread this year opened by someone other than me and him.
(And for what it's worth, I should probably disclose publicly that I did notice him commenting on the title of a page when I had just changed said title less than one day earlier, when he had not otherwise edited the page in nine years. [1])
Since he still didn't mention me by name, and the exact wording of Kudpung's earlier final warning didn't tell him that that still wasn't cool, I'll leave it up to you what the upper limit on action taken here should be, but I'd like to request that at the very least you issue another final warning that explicitly tells him that showing up to noticeboard discussions right after me is not cool.
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 21:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Simply noting that I received the ping of my name here and that the Iban was a mutual one which prohibits discussion anywhere in Wikipedia. Also, although I will leave it to others whether to ping him, Doug Weller might have some relevant information to convey. And, in an off topic comment to him, which will almost certainly make no sense to anyone else, I have been told someone mentioned in an email I received moved to somewhere I don't know and is presumably out of the picture, and I get tired of being unduly influenced by anonymous emails anyway. John Carter ( talk) 23:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
I call your obvious, unsupportable explicit refusal to read the statements I read bullshit.You can call it that, if you want I guess. You can call your grandmother a kumquat. You can call the sky Larry. None of those make any more sense than the other.
I really am sorry that you are still so obviously carrying a grudge about my saying some time ago that I did not want you to preach to me on my talk page,LOL I literally have no idea what you're talking about. If you ever said any such thing to me, I've long forgotten it.
...[the rest of your comment]...Yeah, I'm starting to suspect that there may actually be a grudge here, just not on my part. Which would make sense, given this. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, I just wanted to let you know that the Rationalobserver block appeal was already closed (as declined) at the time of your comment. Speaking with my clerk hat on, would you consider self-reverting your comment? Thanks! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Reporting user turns out to be a sock and probable undisclosed paid editor. Shocker.
Beeblebrox (
talk) 00:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
|
---|
Hello Beeeblebrox, You deleted a page I wrote for a company called The Next Web, I wrote an unbiased history of a notable media company that gets as much traffic as Tech Crunch and included legitimate citation sources to sites such as Bloomberg, Forbes, Entrepreneur, IBM, Techcrunch, Digiday etc. I see that page had been created and deleted before but the page i wrote was completely different and sourced. I even added controversial content to criticism's they received it. Burton37 ( talk)
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).
I’ve started an RFC on the inclusion of lists of transportation service destinations. See WP:VPP#transportation lists BillHPike ( talk, contribs) 00:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox,
Thanks,
Artscanada ( talk) 18:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebox,
Thanks,
Artscanada ( talk) 20:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Alright, I will have to make a few more edits before its completely done, so the 10 edit requirement shouldn't be an issue, thank you so much for help, I really appreciate it!
Artscanada (
talk) 21:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebox,
Thanks, Artscanada ( talk) 17:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of 2018 Gulf of Alaska Earthquake at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 20:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.Hi Beeblebrox. Just a quick note to let you know I’ve closed this RFC. Cheers, Fish+ Karate 13:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox... thanks for your assistance. I only check on the Wayne Caparas page from time to time, and I don't personally have the time (or expertise) to rebuild the new page, so can you, or maybe others in the Wiki community get it restored to some degree? As a writer who wrote for two of the magazines he helped create back in the 90's, I (or colleagues) have several of old hard copy references that were used in the deleted article, so I could possibly come back to make relevant additions with those if necessary, but I'm hoping the community can put something live in short order without my assistance, aside from the five articles I sent in the help desk discussion... which, I believe, is more than enough to get the page live again. Can you send me a link to where you are setting up this new draft you mentioned? Thank you KaySorin ( talk) 23:16, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
sir i am new here, today i creat my new artical about of my youtube channel but it not show , maybe its not approve to publish by admin. Gujarati Pipudi ( talk) 09:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
On 14 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2018 Gulf of Alaska earthquake, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:32, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I replied at my talk page. Best wishes, 144.35.45.46 ( talk) 00:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, as you commented previously, the user Prince of Thieves seems to be issuing blanket deletion requests for topics on his page /info/en/?search=User:Prince_of_Thieves/sandbox/Bitcoins according to some notability criteria that he does not explain. For instance, pages such as NEO_(cryptocurrency) being flagged as non-notable while abandoned projects such as Coinye are considered notable. Are these sorts of edits typical Wikipedia policy? Thanks 66.135.187.169 ( talk) 01:15, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I was heading to work a few weeks ago when I saw, out of the dark, this silhouette of a moose crossing my street. It was a good 100 feet away, and I was only doing 10 mph, but it was 34 degrees and water on top of ice. I hit the brakes but just kept sliding and sliding, slowly inching ever closer to this moose with a deer-in-the-headlights look on its face. I came to a stop about 2 inches long, knocked his legs out from under him. He toppled over onto the hood of my car and rolled off the side headfirst onto the road. Not thinking, I jumped out and said (no kidding) "Dude! Are you alright?" He got up and gave me this look like I was crazy, took two steps, looked back at me again, and walked away. Brutal how these vicious moose can be.
I still agree with your sentiments. Others don't seem to have much of an opinion, but if no one responds I'll support a merge. Zaereth ( talk) 01:46, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I cannot create this article as it's protected from recreation. Noticing that there are pretty decent articles on this in French, Chinese and Catalan. Personally I work in digital and TNW is one of the major news sources. I am willing to find good sources which indicate this. I have no ulterior motive other than this clearly is an important publisher and should be documented in Wikipedia. Keizers ( talk) 19:10, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Could you block me for about a month? I'd like to be offline for a few reasons, such as the fact that Wikipedia takes up too much of my time and provides very little reward (which I suppose is to be expected). Centibyte (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).
A new user created Wikipedia:BAMBI and added it to the LTA page. Please clean up! That LTA page needs to be deleted. Any chance of an MfD? I picked you for this request because you edited the page in March. Johnuniq ( talk) 23:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
What was wrong with my AFG post on their talk page ? This is the second time you've done that. The first one I just let be, but this is their second contribution, and AFG is considered a guideline unless they prove to not want to listen , then , it's on them. ►К Ф Ƽ Ħ◄ 18:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
This is the latest in an interminable series of disposable socks created by our fanatic Filipino radio station buff, who persists in creating articles with the brand names currently used by stations, rather than the call letters of the stations themselves as our MOS dictates. Fortunately, it makes him easy to spot. Other symptoms? He is real big on the exact location of the station's office and broadcast facilities. I've been playing whack-a-mole with the guy for so long that I don't even remember the original sockmaster's username. -- Orange Mike | Talk 01:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, You are invited here for feedback. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 </Talk> 16:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
The List of YouTubers is being nominated for deletion again. I don't know why. It's been nominated so many damn times. Take a look here. Mr. C.C. Hey yo! I didn't do it! 00:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Beeblebrox. Would you have the time and be so kind as to review the draft RFC at Wikipedia:Request for comment on tone in medical writing? Thanks, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).
equals_to_any
function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to
see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to
Logstash.Hi, Beeblebrox,
Greetings, in what appears to be ours' crossing the path for the first time:)
Are you certain about your re-granting of rollback privilege to Harshrathod50, in light of the multiple cases of edit-warring-notices at his t/p (he was cautious enough to not breach 3RRN, though...) and hostile-communication patterns, as pointed out by Spiff.Also, please check his t/p history, for he now routinely removes any conversations and warnings about his edits as useless discussions.Best, ~ Winged Blades Godric 08:35, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
May I be granted Rollback and Pending Reviewer privileges? I see that you granted RickyCourtney Pending Reviewer privileges a few days ago. I pledge to use such privileges in a responsible manner. I also pledge to use them no more than once a week for the first month as well as to carefully consider each and every use during that period, using them only for the most ironclad reasons. Evidence of my good Wikipedia citizenship includes having a good article and featured article to my credit. I do not claim ownership of articles but the FA was a result of expansion from a 9 line stub-like article to FA predominately single handedly and being credit by some of the edit counter tools as contributing more than half of the text of the FA. Thank you for your kind consideration of my request. Vanguard10 20:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thank you for the welcome... and the cookies! (it looks pretty). I hope to make good editions here. And there. Regards Διεγο Απόλλων Άρης (Alejandro) ( talk) 01:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC) |
I don't know the circumstances behind DePieps current block or even any of DePiep's past blocks; however, given that DePiep has actively edited Template:Infobox drug, which transcludes to slightly over 7000 articles, and played a pivotal role in improving and greatly expanding its functionality over that time period, I think that indefinitely hard-blocking him is a very bad idea unless his infractions have been particularly egregious. The benefit of his editing to Wikipedia should ideally be weighed against the cost of his behavioral infractions.
In any event, I didn't come here to advocate for his unblocking because I don't know what he did. I'm just asking you to take both the costs and the benefits of his continued editing into consideration for your decision on his current block duration. Seppi333 ( Insert 2¢) 18:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Yep. The basic idea is to force them to discuss the issues that have been brought up with their editing. Their pattern suggests that their usual tactic is to just lay low and wait for things to blow over, as they have during previous blocks which had expiration dates, the last one being a full three months. Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
I saw you mention a library in Homer Alaska being nearby. I mostly work on NRHP and other historic site articles, and wonder if you are alert to opportunities to grab pix of NRHP-listed places in Kenai Peninsula Borough. For example Cooper Landing Historic District is just 120 miles away. :) And Hirshey Mine is just 180, and Victor Holm Cabin is practically next door. :) -- Doncram ( talk) 22:44, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) I spent all of last month in Anchorage, mostly for medical reasons. May be going back if things don't improve anytime soon. Anyway, the only NRHP-related item I went out of my way to photograph was The Wireless Station, seeing as how far it is off the normal tourist path. I think we put too much emphasis on NRHP stuff as it is, to the point where we've seen tourists who have gone around Juneau and Ketchikan to photograph NRHP sites and have gone directly past other places of historical interest and not bothered to take any photographs. What's especially ridiculous is that we really don't need more current photos of Mayflower School while we currently have zero of the historic block of Front Street right across the street, which is special because the 1937 fire left precious little of that pioneer architecture remaining in the townsite (I no longer have the photos I took in 1996 and 1997, which were my last trips to Juneau). Oh yeah, also, I finally got around to visiting the pile of rubble that used to be the Masonic Temple the other day to take a photograph. Dunno when I will have the time to upload any of those photos or the many hundreds of others I have in the queue, however.
Also, here's a fun fact. One of Bill Walker's deputy campaign treasurers is named Sarah Heath and resides in the Mat-Su Valley. Hopefully it should be a little obvious that we're not talking about that Sarah Heath. Cheers. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 00:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
I could have sworn that you wrote an essay with this title, and I was trying to find it but can't. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your note, I respectfully won't be resigning. Participating in a discussion is completely different from closing a discussion. My actions as an editor, on a certain topic which I feel strongly about, are in no way a reflection of my ability to close a discussion I am dispassionate toward, such as an RFA. For what it's worth, I promoted a user to administrator in 2017 [6] so per the inactivity guidelines, I am not close to relinquishing my bureaucrat tools due to inactivity. I don't wish to argue with you. Andrevan @ 19:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Asked and answered, show a little patience.
Beeblebrox (
talk) 02:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
|
---|
In my humble opinion and with all due respect, you should withdraw your case, with no hard feelings held from my end. It is misfiled, and you haven't met the burden to show there is need for a case to be opened for my advanced permissions. I understand you are trying to help Wikipedia, but you didn't show evidence of a pattern of misuse of admin tools in your filing, and I don't believe you will find evidence of this in my history. If there are any issues or concerns from the past that you'd like to discuss, I am happy to. I'm not perfect and I've been involved in some disputes over the years, but I urge you to consider withdrawing this. Andrevan @ 23:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
|
Heard you had a bit off a fall. I am sure that you don't need me to tell you to apply ice to your ankle if there is swelling or it feels hot and to keep your weight off of it, but I do want to wish you a speedy recovery. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 02:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
This is just a friendly question, please don't take it the wrong way. You and other users originally asked me to resign my bureaucrat flag (not my admin flag), then brought the case we're now gearing up toward. I understand the offer may not still stand for me to resign that flag and you to withdraw the case, since it's already been accepted, and that's fine. However, you are still listed as the party, and I'm not sure what's going on with it, but I do know I probably don't have a lot of time in the coming months to deal with the case, especially if it is going to take a lot of time and energy and sounds stressful. Anyway, just wanted to ask if the offer to resign the bureaucrat flag in exchange for dropping the case is still even possible, mainly in the interest of not having to slog through the case if that's the likely outcome. I also would like to know if "double jeopardy" exists in the land of ArbCom - if you drop the case, can anyone else bring the same case again in the future? Obviously, a moot point if the offer doesn't stand anymore or is invalid, but I'm guessing neither of us really wants to do all the work for a case. Again, simply a friendly query, you can answer either way or not at all if you prefer. Andrevan @ 21:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
—SerialNumber54129 paranoia / cheap sh*t room 21:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Andrevan. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Andrevan/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 23, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Andrevan/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Amortias ( T)( C) 19:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is considering a motion to dismiss the Andrevan arbitration case. Comments are welcome at the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 04:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
So you come to AN and express a very strong opinion on one matter, then you come along to the other thread where the matter is discussed and you immediately close it, with a similar strong opinion as the closing rationale. I just don't get it. – Uanfala (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
As it's that time of year, I dunno how much time I'll have for anything around here for a matter of weeks or months. Anyway, quite a number of BITEy edits to Fairbanks, Alaska have shown up on my watchlist today. I walked away from that previous discussion at Butte, Alaska when he attempted to construe my observations about his editing behavior as a "personal attack" or some such thing. Looks to me like AnaSoc is an enthusiastic new contributor. Is the same thing going to happen which happened with the new editor over at the Butte article, namely that they just gave up on contributing after a while? I'm getting to the point of questioning my own continued participation even more than I already have. Basically, this dude and his predictable pattern of "I like it/I don't like it"-based editing are begging to be exposed, and he should be lucky that I don't have that kind of time right now. This behavior appears to be excused away mainly because he's adept at script editing and gaming various Wikipedian processes. Otherwise, someone would be calling it long-term abuse. What I've seen of his efforts of behalf of WP Schools is far worse. The whole Satch Carlson thing at the Bartlett High School article is a prime example, but there are far too many examples of him showing up at these articles solely to judge the contributions of others while contributing little or nothing himself. Well, two can play that game. I have a bunch of photos of and related to schools that I WILL NOT be uploading so long as this sort of nonsense continues to be tolerated by the community. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 23:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is great, but it shouldn’t be one’s whole life, and getting into some controversy or whatever here shouldn’t rile you up all that much. It’s all just words on a page.
With that in mind, it’s June in Alaska, it’s warm and green and pleasant and the bugs aren’t too bad so I’m gonna go out in the woods and have campfires and go fishing for a couple days, maybe longer if I can manage it. If anyone needs anything before then, look elsewhere. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Because Andrevan ( talk · contribs) has resigned as an administrator and a bureaucrat, this case is dismissed. Andrevan may not regain either the administrator or bureaucrat permission without passing a new request for adminship and/or bureaucratship.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).
You are invited to join the discussion at User:Kudpung/What do admins do?. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Can you take a look at your RAN close? You actually didn't archive the whole discussion (most of the !voting took place at the top), and there was a section in-between in which deleting RAN's userspace articles was being discussed, which got derailed when TonyB re-opened his initial close. I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to take the article-deletion discussion out from where it is, move it to the bottom, and extend the archiving to the top of the thread, leaving the article-deletion discussion unarchived. I don't want to mess around with what could be a controversial close, but I think it would be useful to see if the article-deletion discussion (which was a post-close add-on) gets any traction. Thanks, Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
On 1 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stormy Lake (Alaska), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alaska's Stormy Lake had to be poisoned to remove invasive species not once but twice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stormy Lake (Alaska). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Stormy Lake (Alaska)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I am trying to add the above notice to the bottom of my list of DYKs and barnstars on my user page. For some reason it keeps showing up wrapped inside the previous barnstar. I’ve previewed it with various coding added to fix it and none of it has worked, I seem to the at the end of my limited expertise in this area. Thanks for your attention to this matter. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).
Hi, I knocked up a rough code to see if this was fesible (fesible for me that is! - I'm not a python expert, more "intermediate" - the main questions is can I find the correct Api calls and process the answers.). I've taken the 4 subpages of the main page and managed to analyse them. So far I've managed to:
That all works (surprised myself), however as is always the case, manipulating the data does have a few (thankfully minor) issues. If we are going forward then we need to resolve these first.
The debug output of the initial code can be found at http://www.ronjones.org.uk/misc/16402.txt:
Hope that makes some sense. I've yet to look at the archive pages, I'm assuming they are similar. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:53, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
That all looks good to me. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Hhkohh ( talk · contribs) is asking me to sort pages into their category, which I feel is not in the spirit of the 6-month topic ban. What do you think? @ Doomsdayer520, Davey2010, and Beyond My Ken: Pinging associated users involved at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Issue_with_deletion_sorting -- Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:00, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Dweller's admiration | |
Congratulations. Just by considering coming and helping out again at
WP:ERRORS, you have earned Dweller's admiration.
Just think how much admiration will follow when you wade in up to your knees in a weirdly uninteresting DYK that has dodgy sourcing and inappropriate piped links! Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 20:47, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
I block those as "username: impersonation of a famous person" on the grounds that the manager/flack/PR intern, by creating an article, is explicitly asserting that the subject is famous (and thus should not be impersonated). -- Orange Mike | Talk 00:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Five years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:15, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. So the page does not actually need improvement (it was kinda new even though it was deleted). Do I have to move it into user space or is that a special process; how does this work (sory, new to this thing)? All the best. Katz191 ( talk) 20:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
That is actually a very good idea. Again thanks for the help. Katz191 ( talk) 21:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I was just wondering, if this method is okay to archive. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:31, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wood-Tikchik State Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KDLG ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
On 26 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Captain Cook State Recreation Area, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alaska's Captain Cook State Recreation Area was a traditional salmon fishing spot for the Dena'ina people, before being used for commercial fishing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Captain Cook State Recreation Area. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Captain Cook State Recreation Area), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Wood-Tikchik State Park at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 05:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
If we're not more careful in the future people will start figuring out we're the same person.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:00, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. You recently closed my " restrict Wikinews links in articles proposal as approved. What is the protocol now? Should I make the changes to WP:SISTER myself or is this a matter for an uninvolved editor/admin? Also, would it be appropriate to explicitly add "Wikinews linking templates should not be placed within the main body of articles" into WP:SISTER? This wasn't explicitly in the text of the proposal, but it is what all the support !votes were in favour of. Thanks, -- LukeSurl t c 11:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).
On 12 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wood-Tikchik State Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wood-Tikchik State Park, the largest state park in the United States, is sometimes staffed by a single ranger? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wood-Tikchik State Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Wood-Tikchik State Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
this thread is in response to this edit, which the user removed and chose to respond to here rather than where the conversation was begun. Beeblebrox ( talk) 02:07, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
To Beeblebrox:
The PIPE Here - as there is no larger "protected area" at the U.S. state level to my knowledge than New York State's Adirondack Park, of 24,281 km2 in area, how would you suggest it be termed? The so-named "Wood-Tikchik State Park" seems to be directly under some sort of "state park"-designated authority in the Alaska state government; but at its 6,500 km2 area, it is NOT the largest "U.S. state-level protected area" of any recognized designation, to my knowledge, within any state's borders in the United States...until someone clearly tells me about one that's larger than 24,281 km2 in area, "the largest state-level protected area in the United States" IS the status of Adirondack Park.
Thank you, The PIPE ( talk) 01:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
21:08, 16 August 2018 Beeblebrox (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Cangshan Cutlery Company (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank)
I went over the article that I originally posted for Cangshan Cutlery and understand now why it was deleted. Some of the wording in the article was coming across as marketing or advertising. I went over the article and tried to take a neutral approach. I also, did a new user so if I do any future edits it will not be associated with the name of the company, I know that was somewhat of an issue.
I am new to Wiki, so I would like to request my new article to be reviewed by you. Please let me know how to request that from you. SocialMediaQ ( talk) 17:12, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. I have looked over the links that you suggested and went over the article. Full draft including links and images included below. SocialMediaQ ( talk) 17:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
From WP:RPP: {[ If it doesn’t, re-report here or contact me on my talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)}} - I've been reporting this page several times. You cannot rangeblock the whole ignorant Russia. The page contained nonsense a whole month again. I cannot babysit it daily. And Russian wikipedians obviously don't care. Pkeas softprotect it. Staszek Lem ( talk) 22:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
The Hard Worker's Barnstar | |
Thanks for taking the time to process and close that long discussion at WP:AN. I'm sure it was not an enjoyable experience. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 22:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC) |
Hi Beeblebrox, I was wondering if I could request a minor amendment to your close here so that it may sound slightly less condescending; regardless of the nature of the request, I think a "NOPE" caption is probably not really needed at a very minimum. Feel free to ignore if you think this is inconsequential. Thanks for the consideration. Alex Shih ( talk) 23:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
NadirAli is now abusing his talk page. His email and talk page access had to be revoked upon the initial block for siteban per Wikipedia:Banning_policy#User_pages. Consider doing this needful process. Accesscrawl ( talk) 02:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking RHawortth ( talk · contribs). Could you do RHowarthh ( talk · contribs) as well please? — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi. You were the last admin to deal with this editor. (The blocking admin, Moreschi, hasn't edited since 2014.) I believe that Ludvikus is currently editing as 108.34.206.74. Compare the argument by Ludvikus here and that by the IP here.
Their mainspace overlaps are here. (Despite what the tool says, the IP has 514 edits)
I could file an SPI, but CUs won't connect an account (even an indef blocked one, which I find a bit odd) and an IP.
Would you take a look and see what you think? Maybe the evidence is too thin to block for evasion. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 05:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Deprecated. Use ... instead
. An example is article_text
which is now page_title
.page_age
.Signature failure detected. [8] -- DBig Xrayᗙ 20:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Was for your edit summary. I've adored that little turn of the tongue since I was a kid. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 18:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
So you caught a big mistake I made on Quartz Lake (Alaska) that has bigger consequences. There are a number of lake pages that I broke. I'm working on fixing it now. Sorry about that... And thank you for catching it! -- Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:00, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox. On AN, you had closed the thread as "Close is fine, warnings stand." On that thread, I had mentioned that "these warnings without any basis needs to be overturned". I asked for overturning because they were logged on WP:ER/UC, a page which I later learned is only for sanctions like conditional unblock.
I thought that "final warning" is just as understandable as a sanction like "Topic ban", "Interaction ban", since they were logged on WP:EDR. Swarm himself said that he wrote the warnings for logging on EDR. [9]
However, it was hours later of your AN closure that I learned that there is no sanction like "final warning" and only Swarm has been the admin so far who has written "final warnings" to several editors and then log them as sanctions on EDR. This was never clarified by anyone on AN. I started a discussion on talk page of Wikipedia talk:Editing restrictions#WP:ER/UC where everyone including you has said that warnings are not logged on EDR and should be removed.
Some including current arbitrator Callanecc said on warnings that there is "no requirement that the user abide by it, it can't bind other admins and has no community support (in policy)". [10]
It is clear that there were misunderstandings regarding final warning and EDR process since the beginning, but it has been now clarified by enough editors. Swarm has also assumed that this is a "community sanction" because of your closure, [11] but I think that is another misunderstanding that can be avoided if you change the closure.
I request you to change the AN closure to reflect these events so that there would be no further misunderstanding. Thanks. Accesscrawl ( talk) 16:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Early fall can be a truly glorious time of year in Alaska, it’s still kinda warm, the bugs and the tourists are mostly gone, and it’s just pretty. So, I’m out for the next week or so catching fish and having campfires. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't think a hard block is justified for WikiModLA. I don't think the user quite realized that the username was unacceptable (it implied a position of authority), and he should be able to create a new account with a different username. Or is there something else wrong with the name that I'm missing? funplussmart ( talk) 23:45, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
You declined my UAA report, please see this declaration and maybe you'll recosider. thank you, - FlightTime Phone ( open channel) 23:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Your amendment request has been archived at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Michael Hardy. For the Arbitration Committee, Mini apolis 19:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WP:Administrator's noticeboard/IncidentsI#User:Eaterjolly. Kirbanzo ( talk) 22:36, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 35 | ← | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 | Archive 41 | → | Archive 45 |
Earlier this month
John Carter (
talk ·
contribs) was blocked by
BU Rob13 (
talk ·
contribs) for explicitly violating my interaction ban with him (which you implemented
here). Following the block,
Curly Turkey (
talk ·
contribs) and
Softlavender (
talk ·
contribs)
commented that he should receive a final warning for skirt[ing] the IBAN—including commenting in ANI threads directly below Hijiri while not actually mentioning Hijiri's name
and repeatedly stealth-violating the IBan while ostensibly appearing not to technically (in the very strictest sense)
, and
Kudpung (
talk ·
contribs) closed the thread and
didn't quite issue the exact final warning that was requested (as he didn't mention the stealth violations). Kudpung referred to "consensus", but everyone who commented specifically mentioned the stealth violations, which is why I think the post-block final warning probably should have mentioned these, but... Anyway, this is why I didn't seek any enforcement when he showed up on
WT:BIBLE shortly after me, and has been opening alternating threads with me for the last few weeks, having previously not edited there in almost a year (in one of the hounding incidents that led to the IBAN; he hadn't otherwise edited the page since May 2016 - see the timeline
here).
Just now, he posted this right below my saying something to the same effect (he pointed out that there are Orthodox bibles, I that there's a Jewish bible, both making the basic point that the OP's "Catholic vs. Protestant" dichotomy is flawed), in the first thread this year opened by someone other than me and him.
(And for what it's worth, I should probably disclose publicly that I did notice him commenting on the title of a page when I had just changed said title less than one day earlier, when he had not otherwise edited the page in nine years. [1])
Since he still didn't mention me by name, and the exact wording of Kudpung's earlier final warning didn't tell him that that still wasn't cool, I'll leave it up to you what the upper limit on action taken here should be, but I'd like to request that at the very least you issue another final warning that explicitly tells him that showing up to noticeboard discussions right after me is not cool.
Hijiri 88 ( 聖 やや) 21:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Simply noting that I received the ping of my name here and that the Iban was a mutual one which prohibits discussion anywhere in Wikipedia. Also, although I will leave it to others whether to ping him, Doug Weller might have some relevant information to convey. And, in an off topic comment to him, which will almost certainly make no sense to anyone else, I have been told someone mentioned in an email I received moved to somewhere I don't know and is presumably out of the picture, and I get tired of being unduly influenced by anonymous emails anyway. John Carter ( talk) 23:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
I call your obvious, unsupportable explicit refusal to read the statements I read bullshit.You can call it that, if you want I guess. You can call your grandmother a kumquat. You can call the sky Larry. None of those make any more sense than the other.
I really am sorry that you are still so obviously carrying a grudge about my saying some time ago that I did not want you to preach to me on my talk page,LOL I literally have no idea what you're talking about. If you ever said any such thing to me, I've long forgotten it.
...[the rest of your comment]...Yeah, I'm starting to suspect that there may actually be a grudge here, just not on my part. Which would make sense, given this. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, I just wanted to let you know that the Rationalobserver block appeal was already closed (as declined) at the time of your comment. Speaking with my clerk hat on, would you consider self-reverting your comment? Thanks! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 00:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Reporting user turns out to be a sock and probable undisclosed paid editor. Shocker.
Beeblebrox (
talk) 00:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
|
---|
Hello Beeeblebrox, You deleted a page I wrote for a company called The Next Web, I wrote an unbiased history of a notable media company that gets as much traffic as Tech Crunch and included legitimate citation sources to sites such as Bloomberg, Forbes, Entrepreneur, IBM, Techcrunch, Digiday etc. I see that page had been created and deleted before but the page i wrote was completely different and sourced. I even added controversial content to criticism's they received it. Burton37 ( talk)
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).
I’ve started an RFC on the inclusion of lists of transportation service destinations. See WP:VPP#transportation lists BillHPike ( talk, contribs) 00:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox,
Thanks,
Artscanada ( talk) 18:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebox,
Thanks,
Artscanada ( talk) 20:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Alright, I will have to make a few more edits before its completely done, so the 10 edit requirement shouldn't be an issue, thank you so much for help, I really appreciate it!
Artscanada (
talk) 21:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebox,
Thanks, Artscanada ( talk) 17:53, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of 2018 Gulf of Alaska Earthquake at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 20:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.Hi Beeblebrox. Just a quick note to let you know I’ve closed this RFC. Cheers, Fish+ Karate 13:28, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox... thanks for your assistance. I only check on the Wayne Caparas page from time to time, and I don't personally have the time (or expertise) to rebuild the new page, so can you, or maybe others in the Wiki community get it restored to some degree? As a writer who wrote for two of the magazines he helped create back in the 90's, I (or colleagues) have several of old hard copy references that were used in the deleted article, so I could possibly come back to make relevant additions with those if necessary, but I'm hoping the community can put something live in short order without my assistance, aside from the five articles I sent in the help desk discussion... which, I believe, is more than enough to get the page live again. Can you send me a link to where you are setting up this new draft you mentioned? Thank you KaySorin ( talk) 23:16, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
sir i am new here, today i creat my new artical about of my youtube channel but it not show , maybe its not approve to publish by admin. Gujarati Pipudi ( talk) 09:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
On 14 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2018 Gulf of Alaska earthquake, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:32, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I replied at my talk page. Best wishes, 144.35.45.46 ( talk) 00:51, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, as you commented previously, the user Prince of Thieves seems to be issuing blanket deletion requests for topics on his page /info/en/?search=User:Prince_of_Thieves/sandbox/Bitcoins according to some notability criteria that he does not explain. For instance, pages such as NEO_(cryptocurrency) being flagged as non-notable while abandoned projects such as Coinye are considered notable. Are these sorts of edits typical Wikipedia policy? Thanks 66.135.187.169 ( talk) 01:15, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I was heading to work a few weeks ago when I saw, out of the dark, this silhouette of a moose crossing my street. It was a good 100 feet away, and I was only doing 10 mph, but it was 34 degrees and water on top of ice. I hit the brakes but just kept sliding and sliding, slowly inching ever closer to this moose with a deer-in-the-headlights look on its face. I came to a stop about 2 inches long, knocked his legs out from under him. He toppled over onto the hood of my car and rolled off the side headfirst onto the road. Not thinking, I jumped out and said (no kidding) "Dude! Are you alright?" He got up and gave me this look like I was crazy, took two steps, looked back at me again, and walked away. Brutal how these vicious moose can be.
I still agree with your sentiments. Others don't seem to have much of an opinion, but if no one responds I'll support a merge. Zaereth ( talk) 01:46, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I cannot create this article as it's protected from recreation. Noticing that there are pretty decent articles on this in French, Chinese and Catalan. Personally I work in digital and TNW is one of the major news sources. I am willing to find good sources which indicate this. I have no ulterior motive other than this clearly is an important publisher and should be documented in Wikipedia. Keizers ( talk) 19:10, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
Could you block me for about a month? I'd like to be offline for a few reasons, such as the fact that Wikipedia takes up too much of my time and provides very little reward (which I suppose is to be expected). Centibyte (talk) 20:58, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).
A new user created Wikipedia:BAMBI and added it to the LTA page. Please clean up! That LTA page needs to be deleted. Any chance of an MfD? I picked you for this request because you edited the page in March. Johnuniq ( talk) 23:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
What was wrong with my AFG post on their talk page ? This is the second time you've done that. The first one I just let be, but this is their second contribution, and AFG is considered a guideline unless they prove to not want to listen , then , it's on them. ►К Ф Ƽ Ħ◄ 18:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
This is the latest in an interminable series of disposable socks created by our fanatic Filipino radio station buff, who persists in creating articles with the brand names currently used by stations, rather than the call letters of the stations themselves as our MOS dictates. Fortunately, it makes him easy to spot. Other symptoms? He is real big on the exact location of the station's office and broadcast facilities. I've been playing whack-a-mole with the guy for so long that I don't even remember the original sockmaster's username. -- Orange Mike | Talk 01:54, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox, You are invited here for feedback. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 </Talk> 16:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
The List of YouTubers is being nominated for deletion again. I don't know why. It's been nominated so many damn times. Take a look here. Mr. C.C. Hey yo! I didn't do it! 00:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Beeblebrox. Would you have the time and be so kind as to review the draft RFC at Wikipedia:Request for comment on tone in medical writing? Thanks, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 18:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).
equals_to_any
function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to
see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to
Logstash.Hi, Beeblebrox,
Greetings, in what appears to be ours' crossing the path for the first time:)
Are you certain about your re-granting of rollback privilege to Harshrathod50, in light of the multiple cases of edit-warring-notices at his t/p (he was cautious enough to not breach 3RRN, though...) and hostile-communication patterns, as pointed out by Spiff.Also, please check his t/p history, for he now routinely removes any conversations and warnings about his edits as useless discussions.Best, ~ Winged Blades Godric 08:35, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
May I be granted Rollback and Pending Reviewer privileges? I see that you granted RickyCourtney Pending Reviewer privileges a few days ago. I pledge to use such privileges in a responsible manner. I also pledge to use them no more than once a week for the first month as well as to carefully consider each and every use during that period, using them only for the most ironclad reasons. Evidence of my good Wikipedia citizenship includes having a good article and featured article to my credit. I do not claim ownership of articles but the FA was a result of expansion from a 9 line stub-like article to FA predominately single handedly and being credit by some of the edit counter tools as contributing more than half of the text of the FA. Thank you for your kind consideration of my request. Vanguard10 20:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thank you for the welcome... and the cookies! (it looks pretty). I hope to make good editions here. And there. Regards Διεγο Απόλλων Άρης (Alejandro) ( talk) 01:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC) |
I don't know the circumstances behind DePieps current block or even any of DePiep's past blocks; however, given that DePiep has actively edited Template:Infobox drug, which transcludes to slightly over 7000 articles, and played a pivotal role in improving and greatly expanding its functionality over that time period, I think that indefinitely hard-blocking him is a very bad idea unless his infractions have been particularly egregious. The benefit of his editing to Wikipedia should ideally be weighed against the cost of his behavioral infractions.
In any event, I didn't come here to advocate for his unblocking because I don't know what he did. I'm just asking you to take both the costs and the benefits of his continued editing into consideration for your decision on his current block duration. Seppi333 ( Insert 2¢) 18:51, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Yep. The basic idea is to force them to discuss the issues that have been brought up with their editing. Their pattern suggests that their usual tactic is to just lay low and wait for things to blow over, as they have during previous blocks which had expiration dates, the last one being a full three months. Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
I saw you mention a library in Homer Alaska being nearby. I mostly work on NRHP and other historic site articles, and wonder if you are alert to opportunities to grab pix of NRHP-listed places in Kenai Peninsula Borough. For example Cooper Landing Historic District is just 120 miles away. :) And Hirshey Mine is just 180, and Victor Holm Cabin is practically next door. :) -- Doncram ( talk) 22:44, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) I spent all of last month in Anchorage, mostly for medical reasons. May be going back if things don't improve anytime soon. Anyway, the only NRHP-related item I went out of my way to photograph was The Wireless Station, seeing as how far it is off the normal tourist path. I think we put too much emphasis on NRHP stuff as it is, to the point where we've seen tourists who have gone around Juneau and Ketchikan to photograph NRHP sites and have gone directly past other places of historical interest and not bothered to take any photographs. What's especially ridiculous is that we really don't need more current photos of Mayflower School while we currently have zero of the historic block of Front Street right across the street, which is special because the 1937 fire left precious little of that pioneer architecture remaining in the townsite (I no longer have the photos I took in 1996 and 1997, which were my last trips to Juneau). Oh yeah, also, I finally got around to visiting the pile of rubble that used to be the Masonic Temple the other day to take a photograph. Dunno when I will have the time to upload any of those photos or the many hundreds of others I have in the queue, however.
Also, here's a fun fact. One of Bill Walker's deputy campaign treasurers is named Sarah Heath and resides in the Mat-Su Valley. Hopefully it should be a little obvious that we're not talking about that Sarah Heath. Cheers. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 00:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
I could have sworn that you wrote an essay with this title, and I was trying to find it but can't. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your note, I respectfully won't be resigning. Participating in a discussion is completely different from closing a discussion. My actions as an editor, on a certain topic which I feel strongly about, are in no way a reflection of my ability to close a discussion I am dispassionate toward, such as an RFA. For what it's worth, I promoted a user to administrator in 2017 [6] so per the inactivity guidelines, I am not close to relinquishing my bureaucrat tools due to inactivity. I don't wish to argue with you. Andrevan @ 19:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Asked and answered, show a little patience.
Beeblebrox (
talk) 02:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
|
---|
In my humble opinion and with all due respect, you should withdraw your case, with no hard feelings held from my end. It is misfiled, and you haven't met the burden to show there is need for a case to be opened for my advanced permissions. I understand you are trying to help Wikipedia, but you didn't show evidence of a pattern of misuse of admin tools in your filing, and I don't believe you will find evidence of this in my history. If there are any issues or concerns from the past that you'd like to discuss, I am happy to. I'm not perfect and I've been involved in some disputes over the years, but I urge you to consider withdrawing this. Andrevan @ 23:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
|
Heard you had a bit off a fall. I am sure that you don't need me to tell you to apply ice to your ankle if there is swelling or it feels hot and to keep your weight off of it, but I do want to wish you a speedy recovery. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 02:50, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
This is just a friendly question, please don't take it the wrong way. You and other users originally asked me to resign my bureaucrat flag (not my admin flag), then brought the case we're now gearing up toward. I understand the offer may not still stand for me to resign that flag and you to withdraw the case, since it's already been accepted, and that's fine. However, you are still listed as the party, and I'm not sure what's going on with it, but I do know I probably don't have a lot of time in the coming months to deal with the case, especially if it is going to take a lot of time and energy and sounds stressful. Anyway, just wanted to ask if the offer to resign the bureaucrat flag in exchange for dropping the case is still even possible, mainly in the interest of not having to slog through the case if that's the likely outcome. I also would like to know if "double jeopardy" exists in the land of ArbCom - if you drop the case, can anyone else bring the same case again in the future? Obviously, a moot point if the offer doesn't stand anymore or is invalid, but I'm guessing neither of us really wants to do all the work for a case. Again, simply a friendly query, you can answer either way or not at all if you prefer. Andrevan @ 21:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
—SerialNumber54129 paranoia / cheap sh*t room 21:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Andrevan. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Andrevan/Evidence. Please add your evidence by June 23, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Andrevan/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Amortias ( T)( C) 19:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is considering a motion to dismiss the Andrevan arbitration case. Comments are welcome at the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 04:10, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
So you come to AN and express a very strong opinion on one matter, then you come along to the other thread where the matter is discussed and you immediately close it, with a similar strong opinion as the closing rationale. I just don't get it. – Uanfala (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
As it's that time of year, I dunno how much time I'll have for anything around here for a matter of weeks or months. Anyway, quite a number of BITEy edits to Fairbanks, Alaska have shown up on my watchlist today. I walked away from that previous discussion at Butte, Alaska when he attempted to construe my observations about his editing behavior as a "personal attack" or some such thing. Looks to me like AnaSoc is an enthusiastic new contributor. Is the same thing going to happen which happened with the new editor over at the Butte article, namely that they just gave up on contributing after a while? I'm getting to the point of questioning my own continued participation even more than I already have. Basically, this dude and his predictable pattern of "I like it/I don't like it"-based editing are begging to be exposed, and he should be lucky that I don't have that kind of time right now. This behavior appears to be excused away mainly because he's adept at script editing and gaming various Wikipedian processes. Otherwise, someone would be calling it long-term abuse. What I've seen of his efforts of behalf of WP Schools is far worse. The whole Satch Carlson thing at the Bartlett High School article is a prime example, but there are far too many examples of him showing up at these articles solely to judge the contributions of others while contributing little or nothing himself. Well, two can play that game. I have a bunch of photos of and related to schools that I WILL NOT be uploading so long as this sort of nonsense continues to be tolerated by the community. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 23:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is great, but it shouldn’t be one’s whole life, and getting into some controversy or whatever here shouldn’t rile you up all that much. It’s all just words on a page.
With that in mind, it’s June in Alaska, it’s warm and green and pleasant and the bugs aren’t too bad so I’m gonna go out in the woods and have campfires and go fishing for a couple days, maybe longer if I can manage it. If anyone needs anything before then, look elsewhere. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Because Andrevan ( talk · contribs) has resigned as an administrator and a bureaucrat, this case is dismissed. Andrevan may not regain either the administrator or bureaucrat permission without passing a new request for adminship and/or bureaucratship.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).
You are invited to join the discussion at User:Kudpung/What do admins do?. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Can you take a look at your RAN close? You actually didn't archive the whole discussion (most of the !voting took place at the top), and there was a section in-between in which deleting RAN's userspace articles was being discussed, which got derailed when TonyB re-opened his initial close. I'm wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to take the article-deletion discussion out from where it is, move it to the bottom, and extend the archiving to the top of the thread, leaving the article-deletion discussion unarchived. I don't want to mess around with what could be a controversial close, but I think it would be useful to see if the article-deletion discussion (which was a post-close add-on) gets any traction. Thanks, Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
On 1 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stormy Lake (Alaska), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alaska's Stormy Lake had to be poisoned to remove invasive species not once but twice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stormy Lake (Alaska). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Stormy Lake (Alaska)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I am trying to add the above notice to the bottom of my list of DYKs and barnstars on my user page. For some reason it keeps showing up wrapped inside the previous barnstar. I’ve previewed it with various coding added to fix it and none of it has worked, I seem to the at the end of my limited expertise in this area. Thanks for your attention to this matter. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).
Hi, I knocked up a rough code to see if this was fesible (fesible for me that is! - I'm not a python expert, more "intermediate" - the main questions is can I find the correct Api calls and process the answers.). I've taken the 4 subpages of the main page and managed to analyse them. So far I've managed to:
That all works (surprised myself), however as is always the case, manipulating the data does have a few (thankfully minor) issues. If we are going forward then we need to resolve these first.
The debug output of the initial code can be found at http://www.ronjones.org.uk/misc/16402.txt:
Hope that makes some sense. I've yet to look at the archive pages, I'm assuming they are similar. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:53, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
That all looks good to me. Beeblebrox ( talk) 19:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Hhkohh ( talk · contribs) is asking me to sort pages into their category, which I feel is not in the spirit of the 6-month topic ban. What do you think? @ Doomsdayer520, Davey2010, and Beyond My Ken: Pinging associated users involved at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Issue_with_deletion_sorting -- Tyw7 ( 🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 14:00, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Dweller's admiration | |
Congratulations. Just by considering coming and helping out again at
WP:ERRORS, you have earned Dweller's admiration.
Just think how much admiration will follow when you wade in up to your knees in a weirdly uninteresting DYK that has dodgy sourcing and inappropriate piped links! Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 20:47, 19 July 2018 (UTC) |
I block those as "username: impersonation of a famous person" on the grounds that the manager/flack/PR intern, by creating an article, is explicitly asserting that the subject is famous (and thus should not be impersonated). -- Orange Mike | Talk 00:39, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Five years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:15, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. So the page does not actually need improvement (it was kinda new even though it was deleted). Do I have to move it into user space or is that a special process; how does this work (sory, new to this thing)? All the best. Katz191 ( talk) 20:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
That is actually a very good idea. Again thanks for the help. Katz191 ( talk) 21:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I was just wondering, if this method is okay to archive. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:31, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wood-Tikchik State Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KDLG ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
On 26 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Captain Cook State Recreation Area, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alaska's Captain Cook State Recreation Area was a traditional salmon fishing spot for the Dena'ina people, before being used for commercial fishing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Captain Cook State Recreation Area. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Captain Cook State Recreation Area), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Wood-Tikchik State Park at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 05:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
If we're not more careful in the future people will start figuring out we're the same person.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:00, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello. You recently closed my " restrict Wikinews links in articles proposal as approved. What is the protocol now? Should I make the changes to WP:SISTER myself or is this a matter for an uninvolved editor/admin? Also, would it be appropriate to explicitly add "Wikinews linking templates should not be placed within the main body of articles" into WP:SISTER? This wasn't explicitly in the text of the proposal, but it is what all the support !votes were in favour of. Thanks, -- LukeSurl t c 11:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).
On 12 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wood-Tikchik State Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wood-Tikchik State Park, the largest state park in the United States, is sometimes staffed by a single ranger? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wood-Tikchik State Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Wood-Tikchik State Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
this thread is in response to this edit, which the user removed and chose to respond to here rather than where the conversation was begun. Beeblebrox ( talk) 02:07, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
To Beeblebrox:
The PIPE Here - as there is no larger "protected area" at the U.S. state level to my knowledge than New York State's Adirondack Park, of 24,281 km2 in area, how would you suggest it be termed? The so-named "Wood-Tikchik State Park" seems to be directly under some sort of "state park"-designated authority in the Alaska state government; but at its 6,500 km2 area, it is NOT the largest "U.S. state-level protected area" of any recognized designation, to my knowledge, within any state's borders in the United States...until someone clearly tells me about one that's larger than 24,281 km2 in area, "the largest state-level protected area in the United States" IS the status of Adirondack Park.
Thank you, The PIPE ( talk) 01:49, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
21:08, 16 August 2018 Beeblebrox (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Cangshan Cutlery Company (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) (thank)
I went over the article that I originally posted for Cangshan Cutlery and understand now why it was deleted. Some of the wording in the article was coming across as marketing or advertising. I went over the article and tried to take a neutral approach. I also, did a new user so if I do any future edits it will not be associated with the name of the company, I know that was somewhat of an issue.
I am new to Wiki, so I would like to request my new article to be reviewed by you. Please let me know how to request that from you. SocialMediaQ ( talk) 17:12, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. I have looked over the links that you suggested and went over the article. Full draft including links and images included below. SocialMediaQ ( talk) 17:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
From WP:RPP: {[ If it doesn’t, re-report here or contact me on my talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)}} - I've been reporting this page several times. You cannot rangeblock the whole ignorant Russia. The page contained nonsense a whole month again. I cannot babysit it daily. And Russian wikipedians obviously don't care. Pkeas softprotect it. Staszek Lem ( talk) 22:19, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
The Hard Worker's Barnstar | |
Thanks for taking the time to process and close that long discussion at WP:AN. I'm sure it was not an enjoyable experience. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 22:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC) |
Hi Beeblebrox, I was wondering if I could request a minor amendment to your close here so that it may sound slightly less condescending; regardless of the nature of the request, I think a "NOPE" caption is probably not really needed at a very minimum. Feel free to ignore if you think this is inconsequential. Thanks for the consideration. Alex Shih ( talk) 23:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
NadirAli is now abusing his talk page. His email and talk page access had to be revoked upon the initial block for siteban per Wikipedia:Banning_policy#User_pages. Consider doing this needful process. Accesscrawl ( talk) 02:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking RHawortth ( talk · contribs). Could you do RHowarthh ( talk · contribs) as well please? — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 13:18, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi. You were the last admin to deal with this editor. (The blocking admin, Moreschi, hasn't edited since 2014.) I believe that Ludvikus is currently editing as 108.34.206.74. Compare the argument by Ludvikus here and that by the IP here.
Their mainspace overlaps are here. (Despite what the tool says, the IP has 514 edits)
I could file an SPI, but CUs won't connect an account (even an indef blocked one, which I find a bit odd) and an IP.
Would you take a look and see what you think? Maybe the evidence is too thin to block for evasion. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 05:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Deprecated. Use ... instead
. An example is article_text
which is now page_title
.page_age
.Signature failure detected. [8] -- DBig Xrayᗙ 20:56, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Was for your edit summary. I've adored that little turn of the tongue since I was a kid. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 18:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
So you caught a big mistake I made on Quartz Lake (Alaska) that has bigger consequences. There are a number of lake pages that I broke. I'm working on fixing it now. Sorry about that... And thank you for catching it! -- Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 20:00, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Beeblebrox. On AN, you had closed the thread as "Close is fine, warnings stand." On that thread, I had mentioned that "these warnings without any basis needs to be overturned". I asked for overturning because they were logged on WP:ER/UC, a page which I later learned is only for sanctions like conditional unblock.
I thought that "final warning" is just as understandable as a sanction like "Topic ban", "Interaction ban", since they were logged on WP:EDR. Swarm himself said that he wrote the warnings for logging on EDR. [9]
However, it was hours later of your AN closure that I learned that there is no sanction like "final warning" and only Swarm has been the admin so far who has written "final warnings" to several editors and then log them as sanctions on EDR. This was never clarified by anyone on AN. I started a discussion on talk page of Wikipedia talk:Editing restrictions#WP:ER/UC where everyone including you has said that warnings are not logged on EDR and should be removed.
Some including current arbitrator Callanecc said on warnings that there is "no requirement that the user abide by it, it can't bind other admins and has no community support (in policy)". [10]
It is clear that there were misunderstandings regarding final warning and EDR process since the beginning, but it has been now clarified by enough editors. Swarm has also assumed that this is a "community sanction" because of your closure, [11] but I think that is another misunderstanding that can be avoided if you change the closure.
I request you to change the AN closure to reflect these events so that there would be no further misunderstanding. Thanks. Accesscrawl ( talk) 16:32, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Early fall can be a truly glorious time of year in Alaska, it’s still kinda warm, the bugs and the tourists are mostly gone, and it’s just pretty. So, I’m out for the next week or so catching fish and having campfires. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:38, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't think a hard block is justified for WikiModLA. I don't think the user quite realized that the username was unacceptable (it implied a position of authority), and he should be able to create a new account with a different username. Or is there something else wrong with the name that I'm missing? funplussmart ( talk) 23:45, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
You declined my UAA report, please see this declaration and maybe you'll recosider. thank you, - FlightTime Phone ( open channel) 23:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Your amendment request has been archived at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Michael Hardy. For the Arbitration Committee, Mini apolis 19:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WP:Administrator's noticeboard/IncidentsI#User:Eaterjolly. Kirbanzo ( talk) 22:36, 28 September 2018 (UTC)