This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think the problems you brought up in your initial comments have been addressed. Whenever you have time, it'd be great if you could take another look at the article. Thanks. JimmyBlackwing ( talk) 04:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Could we possibly use this (not sure on reliability) for a 1981 DOB? Connormah ( talk) 20:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi David, you have initiated a broad and unlimited ban against me. You did this because supposedly I have "improperly used sources to support his views on the use of Kendrick units." I do not think that I ever did this. Since you did not show a single example to back up your claim, it is difficult for me to defend myself against what I think is a unfounded accusation. Therefore I would like to get into a discussion with you so I can find out why you got this strange idea that I improperly used sources. I am sorry to waste your and my time in this way, but your ban, which is much to broad and indefinite even if the accusations were true, does not leave me with another choice. Kehrli ( talk) 13:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, sorry to bother :) I've just noticed that you are marked as the reviewer for the Dominion War GA review, and it's been waiting for quite a while. Think you could pass through there again just to get the review over with? Thanks, MacMed talk stalk 20:16, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey. I just noticed that Halo 3 was put up for FAR, which is too bad. Are you planning to fix the issues Jinnai raised, or are you going to let the review take its course? I know you're super-busy these days, so I was wondering. JimmyBlackwing ( talk) 19:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey :) I have a question regarding Rachel Garret on the review page. Thx. Rcej (Robert) – talk 06:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
"It is widely known that the film will suck ass but Soulja Boy and Waka Flocka still pursue the making of the film."
Alright this is the 5th time i have seen something like that on this page i realy belive we need to put a lock up can you please do this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awsometilthegrave ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi David. Your name and previous comments have come up in a recent discussion at Spock. If you would like to contribute, your opinion would be helpful. Thanks. Erikeltic ( Talk) 03:38, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:St08-post-first-contact.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 04:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Dud I am 74.163.16.27,it just that I restarted my computer and my number 74.163.16.213. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.213 ( talk) 15:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Damn it dude yes I am,I am Tailsman67 of the Sonic News Network, Halo Wiki, Fusion Fall wiki, and the Dragonball Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.213 ( talk) 15:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 01:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey mate i added halo 4 to the halo series wiki heres my sourse http://i.imgur.com/RHND3.png Awsometilthegrave ( talk) 14:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Does the ten-year gap legitimise the game having its own article? I am asking this because the Resident Evil remake having its own was turned-down in a discussion due to the gap between original and remake (1996-2002) being considered too small.-- OsirisV ( talk) 18:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Setting up a protected redirect right now is a bad idea. News of this title will likely spur much discussion and coverage over the next few days. Brushing aside rumor mongering and fan speculation, there is still a substantial amount of information being released to the press. Certainly enough for a well-referenced stub. And though opinions may vary on whether there's enough material currently out there to justify an entry, that plurality requires at least an incubation period and AfD discussion to allow for consensus-building. Please reconsider your decision. ˉˉ
anetode
╦╩ 00:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Please assist You participated in the peer review for this article and I would like to know if you're willing to look at it again. I have a little left to do, but I'm more than 95% done with the article and I want to submit it to FA again (third time's a charm!) Please respond on my talk or that page. Thanks. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 04:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests#Myst. Dabomb87 ( talk) 15:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I am writing this message as a third party monitoring an ongoing arbitration case. I have been voicing concerns about a proposed finding of fact since 6 June, but no arbitrator has chosen to respond to those concerns. If you have a moment, I would appreciate your input on Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Racepacket/Proposed_decision#Proposed_finding_9. I apologize for contacting you on your personal talk page, but despite posting notes daily on the proposed decision talk page requesting arbitrator input, no one has responded. Thank you. — Bill Price ( nyb) 22:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey David. Are you still working on a draft for the FT/GT feature for the Newsletter? GamerPro64 04:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on June 16, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 16, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! ۞ Tbhotch ™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 02:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Myst is a graphic adventure video game designed and directed by the brothers Robyn and Rand Miller. It was developed by Cyan (now Cyan Worlds), a studio based in Spokane, Washington, and was published by Brøderbund. The Millers began working on Myst in 1991, Cyan's largest project to date, and released it for the Macintosh computer in 1993. Myst puts the player in the role of the "Stranger", who uses a special book to travel to the island of Myst. There, the player uses other special books written by an artisan and explorer named Atrus to travel to worlds known as "Ages". Clues found in each Age helps to reveal the back-story of the game's characters. The game has several endings, depending on the player's course of action. On release, Myst was a surprise hit, with critics lauding its ability to immerse the player in a fictional world. The game was the best-selling PC game of all time—until The Sims exceeded its sales in 2002—and helped to drive the adoption of the then-nascent CD-ROM format. Myst's success spawned four direct video-game sequels and several spin-off games and novels. ( more...)
(3) A concern regarding this review, posted May 20, remains unaddressed. Please respond ASAP. Thx Rcej (Robert) – talk 06:36, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
I agree with deleting this, but for different reasons. Bearian ( talk) 21:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Oh boy, that's embarrassing...unfortunately I can't fix that for a couple if weeks, but thanks for the heads up... *facepalm* Connormah ( talk) 23:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
David, further to the recent Political activism request for arbitration and various arbitrators' comments at that request to the effect that there had not been to date an RfC/U on Cirt, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cirt. Best, -- J N 466 13:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I have proposed that ArbCom extend the editing restrictions which it placed on Communicat ( talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Motion to extend editing restrictions on Communicat/Communikat and would appreciate your views on this. Thank you Nick-D ( talk) 11:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
David- I expanded it a bit. Not sure what else to discuss though. Maybe my edits can get your creative juices flowing. What we have is probably fine, but I have a nagging feeling that we left something out. :-\ ( Guyinblack25 talk 18:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC))
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opened last weekend (6/24): Opening this weekend (7/1):
Opening next weekend (7/8): Other July releases:
If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 7 – July 2011). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We couldn't do it without you! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 04:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think the problems you brought up in your initial comments have been addressed. Whenever you have time, it'd be great if you could take another look at the article. Thanks. JimmyBlackwing ( talk) 04:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Could we possibly use this (not sure on reliability) for a 1981 DOB? Connormah ( talk) 20:27, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi David, you have initiated a broad and unlimited ban against me. You did this because supposedly I have "improperly used sources to support his views on the use of Kendrick units." I do not think that I ever did this. Since you did not show a single example to back up your claim, it is difficult for me to defend myself against what I think is a unfounded accusation. Therefore I would like to get into a discussion with you so I can find out why you got this strange idea that I improperly used sources. I am sorry to waste your and my time in this way, but your ban, which is much to broad and indefinite even if the accusations were true, does not leave me with another choice. Kehrli ( talk) 13:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, sorry to bother :) I've just noticed that you are marked as the reviewer for the Dominion War GA review, and it's been waiting for quite a while. Think you could pass through there again just to get the review over with? Thanks, MacMed talk stalk 20:16, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey. I just noticed that Halo 3 was put up for FAR, which is too bad. Are you planning to fix the issues Jinnai raised, or are you going to let the review take its course? I know you're super-busy these days, so I was wondering. JimmyBlackwing ( talk) 19:53, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Hey :) I have a question regarding Rachel Garret on the review page. Thx. Rcej (Robert) – talk 06:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
"It is widely known that the film will suck ass but Soulja Boy and Waka Flocka still pursue the making of the film."
Alright this is the 5th time i have seen something like that on this page i realy belive we need to put a lock up can you please do this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Awsometilthegrave ( talk • contribs) 19:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi David. Your name and previous comments have come up in a recent discussion at Spock. If you would like to contribute, your opinion would be helpful. Thanks. Erikeltic ( Talk) 03:38, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:St08-post-first-contact.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 04:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Dud I am 74.163.16.27,it just that I restarted my computer and my number 74.163.16.213. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.213 ( talk) 15:43, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Damn it dude yes I am,I am Tailsman67 of the Sonic News Network, Halo Wiki, Fusion Fall wiki, and the Dragonball Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.163.17.213 ( talk) 15:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opened last weekend (5/27): Opening this weekend (6/3):
Opening next weekend (6/10): Other June releases:
If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 6 – June 2011). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We couldn't do it without you! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 01:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey mate i added halo 4 to the halo series wiki heres my sourse http://i.imgur.com/RHND3.png Awsometilthegrave ( talk) 14:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Does the ten-year gap legitimise the game having its own article? I am asking this because the Resident Evil remake having its own was turned-down in a discussion due to the gap between original and remake (1996-2002) being considered too small.-- OsirisV ( talk) 18:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Setting up a protected redirect right now is a bad idea. News of this title will likely spur much discussion and coverage over the next few days. Brushing aside rumor mongering and fan speculation, there is still a substantial amount of information being released to the press. Certainly enough for a well-referenced stub. And though opinions may vary on whether there's enough material currently out there to justify an entry, that plurality requires at least an incubation period and AfD discussion to allow for consensus-building. Please reconsider your decision. ˉˉ
anetode
╦╩ 00:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Please assist You participated in the peer review for this article and I would like to know if you're willing to look at it again. I have a little left to do, but I'm more than 95% done with the article and I want to submit it to FA again (third time's a charm!) Please respond on my talk or that page. Thanks. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 04:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests#Myst. Dabomb87 ( talk) 15:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I am writing this message as a third party monitoring an ongoing arbitration case. I have been voicing concerns about a proposed finding of fact since 6 June, but no arbitrator has chosen to respond to those concerns. If you have a moment, I would appreciate your input on Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Racepacket/Proposed_decision#Proposed_finding_9. I apologize for contacting you on your personal talk page, but despite posting notes daily on the proposed decision talk page requesting arbitrator input, no one has responded. Thank you. — Bill Price ( nyb) 22:11, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey David. Are you still working on a draft for the FT/GT feature for the Newsletter? GamerPro64 04:49, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on June 16, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 16, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! ۞ Tbhotch ™ & (ↄ), Problems with my English? 02:04, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Myst is a graphic adventure video game designed and directed by the brothers Robyn and Rand Miller. It was developed by Cyan (now Cyan Worlds), a studio based in Spokane, Washington, and was published by Brøderbund. The Millers began working on Myst in 1991, Cyan's largest project to date, and released it for the Macintosh computer in 1993. Myst puts the player in the role of the "Stranger", who uses a special book to travel to the island of Myst. There, the player uses other special books written by an artisan and explorer named Atrus to travel to worlds known as "Ages". Clues found in each Age helps to reveal the back-story of the game's characters. The game has several endings, depending on the player's course of action. On release, Myst was a surprise hit, with critics lauding its ability to immerse the player in a fictional world. The game was the best-selling PC game of all time—until The Sims exceeded its sales in 2002—and helped to drive the adoption of the then-nascent CD-ROM format. Myst's success spawned four direct video-game sequels and several spin-off games and novels. ( more...)
(3) A concern regarding this review, posted May 20, remains unaddressed. Please respond ASAP. Thx Rcej (Robert) – talk 06:36, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
I agree with deleting this, but for different reasons. Bearian ( talk) 21:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Oh boy, that's embarrassing...unfortunately I can't fix that for a couple if weeks, but thanks for the heads up... *facepalm* Connormah ( talk) 23:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
David, further to the recent Political activism request for arbitration and various arbitrators' comments at that request to the effect that there had not been to date an RfC/U on Cirt, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Cirt. Best, -- J N 466 13:22, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I have proposed that ArbCom extend the editing restrictions which it placed on Communicat ( talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Motion to extend editing restrictions on Communicat/Communikat and would appreciate your views on this. Thank you Nick-D ( talk) 11:50, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
David- I expanded it a bit. Not sure what else to discuss though. Maybe my edits can get your creative juices flowing. What we have is probably fine, but I have a nagging feeling that we left something out. :-\ ( Guyinblack25 talk 18:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC))
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Opened last weekend (6/24): Opening this weekend (7/1):
Opening next weekend (7/8): Other July releases:
If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject Film. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy! Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 7 – July 2011). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We couldn't do it without you! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 04:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC)